1742 English cricket season

Last updated

1742 English cricket season
1741
1743

The highlights of the 1742 English cricket season were the two famous London versus Slindon matches in September. There was another match involving a team called England, and the word "cricketer" was used for the first time.

Contents

Details of ten matches are known. [note 1]

London v Slindon

In September, London and Slindon played two matches on the Artillery Ground. [5] There has been confusion about the dates, and the margin of London's victory in the second match, due to one source’s misinterpretation of ambiguous reports in the London Evening Post dated 9 to 11 September. [6] [7] Elsewhere, the references to the second match confirm that 6th and 10th are the correct dates for the two matches. The Daily Advertiser of Saturday, 11 September 1742, reports the margin in the second match as 184 notches and says it was played yesterday. [8] According to Maun's source, the game was due to commence on Wednesday, 8 September, "but was postponed (to the 10th) on account of rain". [9]

Ashley-Cooper said of the first game on the 6th that "London won with great difficulty". A contemporary report said Slindon came into the match having "played forty-three games and lost but one". Several wagers were laid that one Slindon batteralmost certainly Richard Newland would obtain forty runs off his own bat, a feat he failed to achieve. [10] [11]

On the 10th, London won the postponed return match by 184 runs. Slindon offered to play a third match against London, either at Guildford or on the South Downs for £100, but the challenge wasn't accepted. [10] [12]

Surrey v England

Surrey met and defeated a multi-county team, 23 August on Moulsey Hurst. Although later sources have called Surrey's opponents England, the original notice described them as "London, Westminster, Middlesex, Southwark and Part of Kent". Ashley-Cooper mentioned that the Moulsey Hurst ground was in 1900 held by the Hurst Park Racing Club. [5] [10]

London v Bromley

Following the tied match between London and Surrey in 1741, there was another when London met Bromley, 14 June 1742, on the Artillery Ground. Waghorn's source remarked that the game "gave so much satisfaction to the spectators". [5] [13] [14] The teams arranged a rematch on 9 August, also on the Artillery Ground. This was to be "played for a considerable sum", but the result is unknown. [5] [14] [13]

Matches with unknown results

In addition to the August match against Bromley, London arranged five others which were pre-announced but have no known outcomes. The first was scheduled for 7 July, against Richmond on the Artillery Ground. A "considerable sum" was at stake. [5] [14] The same situation applied to a match against Croydon on 26 July. [5] [14] [13]

On 2 August, London were due to play a combined Kent & Surrey team at Duppas Hill, Croydon. The pre-match notice describes the counties team as "the Gentlemen of Kent and Surry and the Sussex Man from Slending (Slindon)". It is possible, but by no means certain, that Richard Newland was the given man. A large sum of money was at stake, and the announcement says "the booths (retail) are to be set back and the ground to be roped round (i.e., forming a boundary)". [11]

Croydon were due to play London a second time, 16 August, again on the Artillery Ground. It is known that two Kent players and "the noted bowler from Slendon (sic)" were to assist Croydon; while two Surrey players were given men to London. The "noted Slindon bowler" may have been Edward Aburrow Sr. [5] [14] [13] [11]

The last of these matches was London v Surrey, due 2 September on the Artillery Ground. A Kent player from Bromley (possibly Robert Colchin) was to be a given man for London. This match was originally scheduled for 6 September. It was rearranged because of the visit of Slindon to London on the 6th. [5] [10] [13]

Other events

A schoolteacher in New Romney made the earliest known use of the word "cricketer" when completing a diary entry. He bestowed the accolade upon one William Pullen of Cranbrook but it was in connection with Pullen's death. He had just been hanged on Penenden Heath near Maidstone for stealing a sheep and five bushels of wheat. [15]

On Thursday, 27 May, the poet Thomas Gray (1716–1771) wrote a letter to a Mr Richard West and said: "There is my Lords ** and ***, they are Statesmen; Do not you remember them dirty boys playing at cricket"? The two "noble lords" are believed to have been John Russell, 4th Duke of Bedford and John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich. [16]

Notes

  1. Some eleven-a-side matches played from 1772 to 1863 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources. [1] However, the term only came into common use around 1864, when overarm bowling was legalised. It was formally defined as a standard by a meeting at Lord's, in May 1894, of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective. [2] Matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have an unofficial first-class status. [3] Pre-1864 matches which are included in the ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as top-class or, at least, historically significant. [4] For further information, see First-class cricket.

References

  1. "First-Class matches in England in 1772" . CricketArchive. Retrieved 29 November 2025.
  2. Wisden (1948). Preston, Hubert (ed.). Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (85th ed.). London: Sporting Handbooks Ltd. p. 813. OCLC   851705816.
  3. ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
  4. ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ACS 1981, p. 21.
  6. Waghorn 1899, pp. 28–29.
  7. Wilson 2005, p. 45.
  8. McCann 2004, p. 24.
  9. Maun 2009, p. 114.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Ashley-Cooper, F. S. (25 January 1900). "At the Sign of the Wicket". Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game. XIX (530). Cricket Magazine: 6 via ACS.
  11. 1 2 3 McCann 2004, p. 22.
  12. McCann 2004, pp. 23–24.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Waghorn 2005, p. 12.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Ashley-Cooper, F. S. (25 January 1900). "At the Sign of the Wicket". Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game. XIX (530). Cricket Magazine: 5 via ACS.
  15. Maun 2009, p. 115.
  16. Maun 2009, p. 110.

Bibliography

Further reading