1771 English cricket season

Last updated

1771 English cricket season
1770
1772

The 1771 English cricket season is notable for the wide bat incident resulting in an amendment to the Laws of Cricket which limited the maximum width of the bat to four and a quarter inches. Details of 14 matches are known, including the historically significant Nottingham v Sheffield match in August. [note 1]

Contents

Nottingham v Sheffield

Played 26/27 August on the Forest Racecourse in Nottingham, [5] the match between the two northern town clubs of Nottingham and Sheffield was historically significant for the development of cricket in the North of England. It was an unusual match because the teams were to play three innings each. Sheffield had scored 81, 62 and 105 for a total of 248. In reply, Nottingham had scored 76 and 112 for a total of 188 with another innings in hand. However, the game ended prematurely, and was "not determined on account of a dispute having arisen by one of the Sheffield players being jostled". [6]

Newspaper reports mention a Sheffield batsman called Osguthorpe who "kept in batting for several hours together". [6]

The match is the earliest known reference to cricket in Nottinghamshire. Both town clubs were the forerunners of their eventual county clubs: Nottinghamshire County Cricket Club, founded in 1841; [7] and Yorkshire County Cricket Club, founded in 1863. [8]

England v Hambledon

England played Hambledon on 12/13 August at Guildford Bason. [5] Hambledon scored 65 and 90; England took a sizeable first innings lead with 146, and needed only 10-0 to win the game convincingly by 10 wickets. The game was reported in the London Gazetteer on Friday, 16 August. [6]

Chertsey v Hambledon

Chertsey hosted Hambledon, 23 and 24 September, on Laleham Burway. [5] Hambledon won by 1 run after totalling 218 in their two innings combined; Chertsey's total was 217. The stake was £50 a side, and the articles decreed that it must be played out, so it became a two-day match. [9] [10]

Although there is no certainty about it, this match could have been the one in which Thomas White, playing for Chertsey, used his extra wide bat, causing the Hambledon players to object. Whenever it happened, the incident brought about a change in the 1774 version of the Laws of Cricket wherein the maximum width of the bat was set at four and one quarter inches. [11] [12] [13]

A return match took place 30 September and 1 October on Broadhalfpenny Down. [5] Chertsey scored 117 and 126. Hambledon replied with 230 and 14 for 0 to win convincingly by 10 wickets. [14]

Duke of Dorset v Sir Horatio Mann

There is some confusion about nomenclature, but two matches were played between teams raised by the Duke of Dorset and Sir Horatio Mann. [5] The first was played 28 and 29 August at Bishopsbourne Paddock and was titled Bourne v Middlesex & Surrey (alternatively, Mann's XI v Dorset's XI). Middlesex & Surrey scored 66 and 25, to which Bourne replied with 53 and 37, so the counties team won by one run. [15]

The return match took place 4 and 5 September on the Artillery Ground. One source calls this match Dorset's XI v Mann's XI, [16] while another says Middlesex & Surrey v Bourne. [17] In another very close finish, Dorset's XI needed 27 to win when their penultimate wicket fell, but the last pair held on to score the runs, and gain a one wicket victory. [17] [16]

Other events

Chertsey played two matches against a combined Richmond, Hampton & Brentford team in July, but no post-match reports were found. [18]

A team called Gentlemen of Sussex was active in July and August, playing three matches against Gentlemen of Kent and two against Gentlemen of Hampshire. [5] Kent won the first match of their three, but the other two are result unknown. [19] Sussex won both their matches against Hampshire, one by 8 wickets, the other by an innings and 74 runs. [20]

In August, there were two minor games at Cobham Tilt in which one of the teams was led by Charles Bennet, 4th Earl of Tankerville, a patron of Surrey teams in the 1770s and the employer of Lumpy Stevens, who was a gardener at Tankerville's Walton-on-Thames estate. Tankerville succeeded to his title on the death of his father on 27 October 1767. This is probably the earliest mention of him in a cricketing connection. [16]

On 8 August, the St James Chronicle reported that a combined Middlesex, Kent and Surrey team had defeated Coulsdon by 45 runs. [16]

On Saturday, 16 November, a general meeting "of the subscribers to the Broadhalfpenny Cricket Club will be held at the George Inn, at Hambledon, in order to appoint stewards and settle the plan for the ensuing year". [21]

Notes

  1. Some eleven-a-side matches played from 1772 to 1863 have been rated "first-class" by certain sources. [1] However, the term only came into common use around 1864, when overarm bowling was legalised. It was formally defined as a standard by a meeting at Lord's, in May 1894, of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) and the county clubs which were then competing in the County Championship. The ruling was effective from the beginning of the 1895 season, but pre-1895 matches of the same standard have no official definition of status because the ruling is not retrospective. [2] Matches of a similar standard since the beginning of the 1864 season are generally considered to have an unofficial first-class status. [3] Pre-1864 matches which are included in the ACS' "Important Match Guide" may generally be regarded as top-class or, at least, historically significant. [4] For further information, see First-class cricket.

References

  1. "First-Class matches in England in 1772" . CricketArchive. Retrieved 29 November 2025.
  2. Wisden (1948). Preston, Hubert (ed.). Wisden Cricketers' Almanack (85th ed.). London: Sporting Handbooks Ltd. p. 813. OCLC   851705816.
  3. ACS 1982, pp. 4–5.
  4. ACS 1981, pp. 1–40.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 ACS 1981, p. 24.
  6. 1 2 3 Buckley 1937, pp. 6–7.
  7. Playfair 2025, p. 157.
  8. Playfair 2025, p. 198.
  9. Waghorn 1899, p. 76.
  10. Buckley 1935, p. 56.
  11. Goulstone, John (1 June 2001). Hambledon: The Men and the Myths. ISBN   978-19-00592-34-5.
  12. Hignell, Andrew, ed. (Autumn 2006). "The Monster Bat Incident, 1771". The Journal of the Cricket Society. 23 (1). Leighton Buzzard: The Cricket Society.
  13. Hotten, Jon (2021). "250 years of cricket bats". Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. Retrieved 9 October 2024 via ESPNcricinfo.
  14. Waghorn 1899, pp. 76–77.
  15. Waghorn 1899, pp. 74–75.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Buckley 1935, p. 55.
  17. 1 2 Waghorn 1899, p. 75.
  18. Buckley 1935, p. 54.
  19. McCann 2004, pp. 74–75.
  20. McCann 2004, pp. 76–78.
  21. Waghorn 2005, p. 34.

Bibliography

Further reading