2001 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

Full caption:	Richard L. Mathias, et al. v. Worldcom Technologies, Inc., et al.
Citations:	535 U.S. 682
	----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion · Justia

Full caption:	Sao Paulo State of the Federative Republic of Brazil v. American Tobacco Co., Inc., et al.
Citations:	535 U.S. 229
Prior history:	Motion for disqualification denied, Minute Entry in Civ. Action Nos. 00–0922, 98–3279 (E.D. La., May 26, 2000); rev'd, sub nom. Republic of Panama v. American Tobacco Co., 250 F. 3d 315 (5th Cir. 2001) (per curiam); rehearing en banc denied, 265 F. 3d 299 (5th Cir. 2001)
	----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion

Full caption:	Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Norman Y. Mineta, Secretary of Transportation, et al.
Citations:	534 U.S. 103
Prior history:	Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Peña , 515 U.S. 200 (1995) (Adarand I); on remand, 965 F. Supp. 1556 (D. Colo. 1997); vacated, sub nom. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Slater, 169 F. 3d 1292 (10th Cir. 1999); rev'd, 528 U.S. 216 (2000); aff'd in part, 228 F. 3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000); cert. granted, 532 U.S. 941 (2001)
	----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion

Last updated May 28, 2023

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2001 term, which began October 1, 2001, and concluded October 6, 2002.^[1]

Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on the Court at the time the decision was handed down are assumed to have participated and concurred unless otherwise noted.

Court membership

Chief Justice: William Rehnquist

Associate Justices: John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, David Souter, Clarence Thomas, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer

Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Mineta

534 U.S. 103
Argued October 31, 2001.
Decided November 27, 2001.
The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

Sao Paulo State of Federative Republic of Brazil v. American Tobacco Co.

535 U.S. 229
Decided April 1, 2002.
Fifth Circuit reversed and remanded.

In a tobacco-products liability suit brought by a foreign state against an American cigarette manufacturer, the Fifth Circuit held that 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)^[2] required the disqualification of the trial court judge because his name had appeared, albeit erroneously, prior to his appointment to the bench, on a motion to file an amicus curiae brief in a similar suit against some of the same defendants. The motion was submitted by an organization of which the judge had been president, but from which he had retired six months prior to its filing. The judge accordingly refused to disqualify himself because his name appeared in error on the motion to file the amicus brief and because he took no part in preparation or approval of the brief. The Fifth Circuit, however, ruled that his explanation would not "dissipate the doubts that a reasonable person would probably have about the court’s impartiality."

The Supreme Court reversed, finding the Fifth Circuit's decision inconsistent with Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp. , 486 U.S. 847 (1988), which stated that §455(a) requires judicial recusal "if a reasonable person, knowing all the circumstances, would expect that the judge would have actual knowledge" of his interest or bias in the case. The Court characterized the Fifth Circuit's decision as based on what "a reasonable person would believe without knowing (or giving due weight to the fact) that the judge’s name was added mistakenly and without his knowledge to a pro forma motion to file an amicus brief in a separate controversy."

Mathias v. WorldCom Technologies, Inc.

535 U.S. 682
Argued December 5, 2001.
Decided May 20, 2002.
The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

The Court dismissed the writ of certiorari following full briefing and oral argument, determining that the petitioners were the prevailing parties below, and sought review of findings that were not essential to the judgment and not binding upon them in future litigation. The Court stated that "[a]s a general rule, a party may not appeal from a favorable judgment simply to obtain review of findings it deems erroneous." The Court noted that it had since granted certiorari in another case that arose in the same factual context to review the same issues.

O'Connor did not participate.

Horn v. Banks

Full caption:	Martin Horn, Commissioner, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al. v. George E. Banks
Citations:	536 U.S. 266
Prior history:	Petition denied, 63 F. Supp. 2d 525 (M.D. Penn. 1999); rev'd in part, 271 F. 3d 527 (3d Cir. 2001).
----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion

536 U.S. 266
Decided June 17, 2002.
Third Circuit reversed and remanded.

Kirk v. Louisiana

Full caption:	Kennedy D. Kirk v. Louisiana
Citations:	536 U.S. 635
Prior history:	Motion to suppress evidence denied; defendant convicted and sentenced; aff'd, 773 So. 2d 259 (La. Ct. App. 2000); review denied, La.
----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion

536 U.S. 635
Decided June 24, 2002.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit, reversed and remanded.

Stewart v. Smith

Full caption:	Terry L. Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. Robert Douglas Smith
Citations:	536 U.S. 856
Prior history:	Petition denied, D. Ariz.; rev'd, 241 F. 3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2001); cert. granted, question certified, 534 U.S. 157 (2001); reply to certified question, 46 P. 3d 1067 (Ariz. 2002)
----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion

536 U.S. 856
Decided June 28, 2002.
Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded.

United States v. Bass

Full caption:	United States v. John Bass
Citations:	536 U.S. 862
Prior history:	Motion for discovery granted, E.D. Mich.; aff'd, 266 F. 3d 532 (6th Cir. 2001)
----
Full text of the opinion:	official slip opinion

536 U.S. 862
Decided June 28, 2002.
Sixth Circuit reversed.

Notes

↑
The descriptions of two opinions have been omitted:
- In Stewart v. Smith, 534 U.S. 157 (2001), the Court granted certiorari and certified a question to the Supreme Court of Arizona; see later opinion at 536 U.S. 856 (2002).
- In Adams v. Florida Power Corp., 535 U.S. 228 (2002), the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.
↑ 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). "Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

Related Research Articles

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2005 term, which lasted from October 3, 2005, until October 1, 2006.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down six per curiam opinions during its 2004 term, which began October 4, 2004 and concluded October 3, 2005.

The 2002 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 7, 2002, and concluded October 5, 2003. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.

The 2001 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 1, 2001, and concluded October 6, 2002. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down seven per curiam opinions during its 2003 term, which began October 6, 2003 and concluded October 3, 2004.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down twelve per curiam opinions during its 2002 term, which began October 7, 2002 and concluded October 5, 2003.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eight per curiam opinions during its 2006 term, which began October 2, 2006 and concluded September 30, 2007.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2008 term, which began on October 6, 2008 and concluded October 4, 2009.

The 2009 term of the Supreme Court of the United States began October 5, 2009, and concluded October 3, 2010. The table illustrates which opinion was filed by each justice in each case and which justices joined each opinion.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nineteen per curiam opinions during its 2009 term, which began on October 5, 2009, and concluded October 3, 2010.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2000 term, which began October 2, 2000 and concluded September 30, 2001.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down ten per curiam opinions during its 2010 term, which began October 4, 2010 and concluded October 1, 2011.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down fourteen per curiam opinions during its 2011 term, which began October 3, 2011 and concluded September 30, 2012.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down six per curiam opinions during its 2012 term, which began October 1, 2012 and concluded October 6, 2013.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eight per curiam opinions during its 2013 term, which began October 7, 2013 and concluded October 5, 2014.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down seven per curiam opinions during its 2018 term, which began October 1, 2018, and concluded October 6, 2019.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down fourteen per curiam opinions during its 2020 term, which began October 5, 2020 and concluded October 3, 2021.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down eight per curiam opinions during its 2021 term, which began October 4, 2021 and concluded October 2, 2022.

The Supreme Court of the United States handed down three per curiam opinions during its 2022 term, which began October 3, 2022 and will conclude October 1, 2023.

References

"2001 Term Opinions of the Court". Supreme Court of the United States. Archived from the original on February 11, 2003. Retrieved July 6, 2010.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.

[1] The descriptions of two opinions have been omitted:
In Stewart v. Smith, 534 U.S. 157 (2001), the Court granted certiorari and certified a question to the Supreme Court of Arizona; see later opinion at 536 U.S. 856 (2002).
In Adams v. Florida Power Corp., 535 U.S. 228 (2002), the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

[mwTw] In Stewart v. Smith, 534 U.S. 157 (2001), the Court granted certiorari and certified a question to the Supreme Court of Arizona; see later opinion at 536 U.S. 856 (2002).

[mwUQ] In Adams v. Florida Power Corp., 535 U.S. 228 (2002), the Court dismissed the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

[2] 28 U.S.C. § 455(a). "Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned."

[1]

[2]

v t e Lists of United States Supreme Court cases
List of cases by Court	Jay, Rutledge, and Ellsworth Courts (1789–1800) Marshall Court (1801–1835) Taney Court (1836–1864) Chase Court (1864–1873) Waite Court (1874–1888) Fuller Court (1888–1910) White Court (1910–1921) Taft Court (1921–1930) Hughes Court (1930–1941) Stone Court (1941–1946) Vinson Court (1946–1953) Warren Court (1953–1969) Burger Court (1969–1986) Rehnquist Court (1986–2005) Roberts Court (2005–present)	Seal of the United States Supreme Court
Complete list	List of cases by volume ( United States Reports )
By recent term	1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
By subject matter	Abortion Arbitration Capital punishment First Amendment Immigration Indian tribes Intellectual property Copyright Patents Trademarks Legal standing LGBTQ rights Mental health Taxation
Other lists	Landmark decisions Pending cases In-chambers opinions Certiorari before judgment Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted