Arumberia

Last updated

Arumberia
Temporal range: Late Ediacaran
Arumberiabottom.jpg
Holotype specimen of Arumberia banksi, a convex hyporelief on the base of a sandstone bed from the Ediacaran Arumbera Sandstone near Alice Springs, Australia
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Kingdom: incertae sedis
Genus:† Arumberia
Glaessner et Walter, 1975
Type species
Arumberia banksi
Glaessner et Walter, 1975
Species
    • A. banksi
    • A. vindhyanensis
    • A. usvaensis
    • A. multykensis
    • A. beckeri
    • A. ollii

Arumberia is an enigmatic fossil from the Ediacaran period [1] originally described from the Arumbera Sandstone, Northern Territory, Australia [2] but also found in the Urals, [3] East Siberia, [4] England and Wales, [5] Northern France, [5] the Avalon Peninsula [5] and India. [6] Several morphologically distinct species are recognized. [3] [7]

Contents

Description

Initially discovered by Glaessner and Walter (1975), Arumberia was described as a problematic cupped-body fossil of an Ediacaran soft-bodied organism characterized by hollow compressible ribbed bodies composed of flexible tissue. Brasier (1979) deemed it a pseudofossil arising from turbid water flow in shallow marine or deltaic environments, due in part to physical and morphological similarities to flume-induced structures previously observed by Dzulynski and Walton (1965). Arumberia appears as a poorly-delimited series of fine parallel grooves arising from a single region or point. Arumberia banksii consists of an array of straight to gently curved parallel to subparallel ridges (rugae) about 1 – 3 mm wide and separated by flat to gently concave furrows of 1 – 7 mm in width. Relief from ridge top to furrow bottom is less than 1 mm. Ridge ranges in length from 1.5 cm to 14.5 cm. Generally the ridges are parallel, but they also bifurcate. Ridges are developed on plane and rippled surfaces. [6]

List of species

There are four species of Arumberia that have been formally recognized. Arumberia banksi has thin siliciclastic biolaminites known as rugose structures [3] including those with subparallel or fanning-out series of rugae (Arumberia banksi s.str.) and sub-parallel series of branching rugae (Arumberia vindhyanensis). [3] The Arumberia multykensis variety is found in greenish gray siltstones as series of near-parallel ridges with positive hyporelief up to 1 mm wide and 0.5 mm high, with 10 mm spacing between the ridges [3] while A. usavaensis occurs as a series of near parallel ridges on the wavy surfaces on linguoid ripple marks which stretch along the paleoflow direction and flatten out as microterraces on the leeward side of the ripples. [3] Arumberia usavensis is found on both upper and lower surfaces of sandstone beds as well as inside sandstones and siltstones. [3] Arumberia beckeri and Arumberia ollii are morphologically distinct from A. banksi [3] and are filamentous and ribbon-shaped compressed macrofossils which host authigenic clay minerals and are most likely unrelated to Arumberia. [7]

Arumberiaanother.jpg
Another specimen of Arumberia banksi, a convex hyporelief on the base of a sandstone bed from the Ediacaran Arumbera Sandstone near Alice Springs, Australia
Arumberiaside.jpg
Side view of holotype specimen of Arumberia banksi, a convex hyporelief on the base of the sandstone bed from the Ediacaran Arumbera Sandstone near Alice Springs, Australia

Locations

Arumberia was first described in Neoproterozoic red sandstones of the lower Arumbera sandstone formation of the Amadeus Basin in Northern Territory, Australia. [2] It has since been found in Argentina, Newfoundland, England, Wales, northeastern Europe, the eastern Sayan Mountains in Russia, Central India, and Rajasthan. [5] [6] [3] [7] [8] [9] In addition, Arumberia has been reported from lower Palaeozoic strata in Brittany, France [5] [9] and from the Upper Ediacaran Cerro Negro Formation in Argentina. [8]

Identity

The identity of Arumberia is controversial. Arumberia has been originally interpreted as a 5–20 cm high cup-like organism, apparently composed of flexible tissue, attached to the sea bottom by a blunt apex [2] or, later, as a colonial organism made of flexible, thin-walled tubes tightly joined through their length. [5] Affinities with Ernietta , Conostichus , Pteridinium , Palaeoplatoda, Phyllozoon and Bergaueria and Chuaria have been conjectured. [5] Spheroidal objects found along with Arumberia have also been interpreted as "dispersable stage" of Arumberia itself. [5] Arumberia has been interpreted as a microbial mat morphotype developed in response to environmental perturbations in terminal Ediacaran shallow marine basins [7]

Conversely, a non biological interpretation has been put forward [1] [10] Past experiments reproduced Arumberia-like traces from flume experiments [11] and from the flux of water around small objects. [12] The absence of Arumberia-like structures after the Ediacaran period could be due to the unique properties of the microbial mat that covered the sea floor at the period. [1] However, there is still debate, with recent analysis of Urals' Arumberia-like structures leaning towards a biological interpretation as an organism adapted to shallow water environments. [3] The rugae of Arumberia are considered to form from exclusively biological processes as observed in modern microbial mats [7] and not from sediment desiccation, cracking or other abiotic processes. Fine wisps of organic material have been observed in thin section of Arumberia cut perpendicular to bedding planes, [9] further suggesting that Arumberia was a living organism.

Recent work describes Arumberia as the fossilized remains of highly organized shallow marine microbial colonies; [3] [7] [13] a microbially-induced sedimentary structure (MISS),; [9] [14] [15] [6] [16] a series of slide marks underneath tough biomats that were exposed to tractional currents carrying sediment, [17] or a biopolymer-bearing lichenized fungi. [18] [19] [20] [21] As such, Arumberia structures remain an enigmatic Ediacaran fossil.

Taphonomy

Facies

The Ediacaran facies where Arumberia has been found are interpreted as terrigenous sedimentary rocks in shallow marine [22] [23] [24] or fluviolacustrine (intertidal or delta plain) settings [7] that may have been affected by desiccation and salinity. [25] However, an alternative interpretation of the Ediacaran facies where Arumberia is found is that they were coastal gypsiferous paleosols of intertidal to supratidal settings. [19] [20] [21] Terminal Ediacaran (560 Ma) facies in Baltica dominantly contain biomarkers (hopane and sterane ratios) characteristic of bacterially-dominated communities in shallow marine oligotrophic settings. [24] These values reflect a high ratio of bacterial to eukaryotic biomass and suggest these ecosystems were nutrient-limited and dominated by bacterial communities, which may have imposed growth constraints and evolutionary modifications to Ediacaran organisms like Arumberia.

Burial compaction and diagenesis

The original interpretation of Arumberia as a conical or cup-shaped depression structure is contrary to modern interpretations of Arumberia as a bulge or impression. [26] Extensive burial from overburden typical in areas where Arumberia is found would greatly compact any bulge or depression of a typical soft-bodied marine metazoan; however, it has been suggested that diagenic silicification, ferrugination or pyritization can provide critical fossil rigidity during burial [8] [27] [26] which supports the soft-body marine metazoan description of Arumberia. The presence of pyrite may impart significant resistance to burial compaction [14] [26] [28] [29] in Arumberia, but to date no study has demonstrated a thick pyritic film of sufficient strength to withstand burial compaction above an unpyritized Ediacaran fossil, [29] which is thought to be a requirement for the preservational models that involve the pyritization of soft-body metazoans like Arumberia.

Analysis of thin sections of Arumberia show remarkable resistance to compaction, which may have been due to the presence of a pyrite sole-veneer. [26] The diagenetic oxidation of pyrite to hematite can remove all traces of the pyrite sole-veneer, [26] so it is difficult to determine the true influence of pyritization on burial compaction in Arumberia. Alternatively, the remarkable resistance to burial compaction may be due to the presence of a resistant biopolymer like chitin which is typical in marine and terrestrial lichens alike [18] [21] Exactly how the fossils are preserved remains controversial, and more research into the taphonomy of Arumberia and other Ediacarans is needed. [27]

See also

Related Research Articles

The cloudinids, an early metazoan family containing the genera Acuticocloudina, Cloudina and Conotubus, lived in the late Ediacaran period about 550 million years ago. and became extinct at the base of the Cambrian. They formed millimetre-scale conical fossils consisting of calcareous cones nested within one another; the appearance of the organism itself remains unknown. The name Cloudina honors the 20th-century geologist and paleontologist Preston Cloud.

<i>Dickinsonia</i> Extinct genus of early animals

Dickinsonia is a genus of extinct organism, most likely an animal, that lived during the late Ediacaran period in what is now Australia, China, Russia, and Ukraine. It is one of the best known members of the Ediacaran biota. The individual Dickinsonia typically resembles a bilaterally symmetrical ribbed oval. Its affinities are presently unknown; its mode of growth has been considered consistent with a stem-group bilaterian affinity, though various other affinities have been proposed. It lived during the late Ediacaran. The discovery of cholesterol molecules in fossils of Dickinsonia lends support to the idea that Dickinsonia was an animal, though these results have been questioned.

<i>Kimberella</i> Primitive Mollusc-like organism

Kimberella is an extinct genus of bilaterian known only from rocks of the Ediacaran period. The slug-like organism fed by scratching the microbial surface on which it dwelt in a manner similar to the gastropods, although its affinity with this group is contentious.

<i>Tribrachidium</i> Extinct genus of invertebrates

Tribrachidium heraldicum is a tri-radially symmetric fossil animal that lived in the late Ediacaran (Vendian) seas. In life, it was hemispherical in form. T. heraldicum is the best known member of the extinct group Trilobozoa.

<i>Spriggina</i> Extinct genus of annelid worms

Spriggina is a genus of early animals whose relationship to living animals is unclear. Fossils of Spriggina are known from the late Ediacaran period in what is now South Australia. Spriggina floundersi is the official fossil emblem of South Australia; it has been found nowhere else.

<i>Yorgia</i> Extinct proarticulate animal

Yorgia waggoneri is a discoid Ediacaran organism. It has a low, segmented body consisting of a short wide "head", no appendages, and a long body region, reaching a maximum length of 25 cm (9.8 in). It is classified within the extinct animal phylum Proarticulata.

<i>Cephalonega</i> Extinct genus of invertebrates

Cephalonega stepanovi is a fossil organism from Ediacaran deposits of the Arkhangelsk Region, Russia. It was described by Mikhail A. Fedonkin in 1976

<i>Rangea</i> Fossil taxon

Rangea is a frond-like Ediacaran fossil with six-fold radial symmetry. It is the type genus of the rangeomorphs.

<i>Parvancorina</i> Genus of fossil arnimal

Parvancorina is a genus of shield-shaped bilaterally symmetrical fossil animal that lived in the late Ediacaran seafloor. It has some superficial similarities with the Cambrian trilobite-like arthropods.

<i>Ovatoscutum</i> Extinct species of enigmatic organism

Ovatoscutum concentricum is one of many enigmatic organisms known from the Ediacaran deposits of the Flinders Ranges, Australia, and the White Sea area in Russia, dating around 555 Ma.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ediacaran biota</span> Life of the Ediacaran period

The Ediacaranbiota is a taxonomic period classification that consists of all life forms that were present on Earth during the Ediacaran Period. These were enigmatic tubular and frond-shaped, mostly sessile, organisms. Trace fossils of these organisms have been found worldwide, and represent the earliest known complex multicellular organisms. The term "Ediacara biota" has received criticism from some scientists due to its alleged inconsistency, arbitrary exclusion of certain fossils, and inability to be precisely defined.

<i>Ernietta</i> Extinct genus of invertebrates

Ernietta is an extinct genus of Ediacaran organisms with an infaunal lifestyle. Fossil preservations and modeling indicate this organism was sessile and “sack”-shaped. It survived partly buried in substrate, with an upturned bell-shaped frill exposed above the sediment-water interface. Ernietta have been recovered from present-day Namibia, and are a part of the Ediacaran biota, a late Proterozoic radiation of multicellular organisms. They are among the earliest complex multicellular organisms and are known from the late Ediacaran. Ernietta plateauensis remains the sole species of the genus.

The end-Ediacaran extinction is a mass extinction believed to have occurred near the end of the Ediacaran period, the final period of the Proterozoic eon. Evidence suggesting that such a mass extinction occurred includes a massive reduction in diversity of acritarchs, the sudden disappearance of the Ediacara biota and calcifying organisms, and the time gap before Cambrian organisms "replaced" them. Some lines of evidence suggests that there may have been two distinct pulses of the extinction event, one occurring 550 million years ago and the other 539 million years ago.

Ediacaran type preservation relates to the dominant preservational mode in the Ediacaran period, where Ediacaran organisms were preserved as casts on the surface of microbial mats.

<i>Medusinites</i> Extinct genus of cnidarians

Medusinites is a genus of disc shaped fossilised organisms associated with the Ediacaran biota. They have been found in rocks dated to be 580 to 541 million years old.

<i>Hallidaya</i> Extinct species of simple animal

The Ediacaran fossil Hallidaya, a close relative of Skinnera lived in Belomorian of the Late Ediacaran period prior to the Cambrian explosion and thrived in the marine strata on the ocean floor of what is now considered Australia. These fossils were disk-shaped organisms that were slightly dome shaped with tri-radial symmetry. These Ediacaran organisms thrived by living in low-energy inner shelf, in the wave- and current-agitated shoreface, and in the high-energy distributary systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Petalonamae</span> Proposed extinct group of animals

The petalonamids (Petalonamae) are an extinct group of archaic animals typical of the Ediacaran biota, also called frondomorphs, dating from approximately 635 million years ago to 516 million years ago. They are benthic and motionless animals, that have the shape of leaves, fronds (frondomorphic), feathers or spindles and were initially considered algae, octocorals or sea pens. It is now believed that there are no living descendants of the group, which shares a probable relation to the Ediacaran animals known as Vendozoans.

Archaeichnium is a member of the Ediacaran biota first described by Martin Glaessner in 1963. It is characterized as a tubular fossil found in the Nama group of South West Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nora Noffke</span> American geobiologist

Nora Noffke is an American geologist who is a professor in the Department of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, USA. Noffke's research focuses on the sedimentology of biofilm forming sedimentary structures in modern aquatic environments, where clastic deposits dominate. Such structures occur in the fossil record as well. Her studies are interdisciplinary combining sedimentology with microbiology, geochemistry, and mineralogy.

References

  1. 1 2 3 McIlroy, D.; Walter, M. (1997). "A reconsideration of the biogenicity of Arumberia banksi Glaessner & Walter". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 21 (1): 79–80. Bibcode:1997Alch...21...79M. doi:10.1080/03115519708619187.
  2. 1 2 3 Glaessner, M. F.; Walter, M. R. (1975). "New Precambrian fossils from the Arumbera Sandstone, Northern Territory, Australia". Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology. 1 (1): 59–69. Bibcode:1975Alch....1...59G. doi:10.1080/03115517508619480.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Kolesnikov, A. V.; Grazhdankin, D. V.; Maslov, A. V. (2012). "Arumberia-type structures in the Upper Vendian of the Urals". Doklady Earth Sciences. 447 (1): 1233–1239. Bibcode:2012DokES.447.1233K. doi:10.1134/S1028334X12110013. S2CID   140695807 . Retrieved 27 January 2013.
  4. ↑ Bogolepova, O. K.; Gubanov, A. P.; Howard, J. P.; Gómez-Pérez, M. (2010). "Arumberia and other microbial mats from the Neoproterozoic-Cambrian strata of East Siberia". Geophysical Research Abstracts. 12: 3143. Bibcode:2010EGUGA..12.3143B.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Bland, B. H. (1984). "Arumberia Glaessner & Walter, a review of its potential for correlation in the region of the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary". Geological Magazine. 121 (6): 625–633. Bibcode:1984GeoM..121..625B. doi:10.1017/S0016756800030776. S2CID   128492261.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Kumar, S.; Pandey, S. K. (December 2009). "Note on the occurrence of Arumberia Banksi and associated fossils from the Jodhpur Sandstone, Marwar Supergroup, western Rajasthan" (PDF). Journal of the Paleontological Society of India. 54 (2): 171–178.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Kolesnikov, A. V.; Danelian, T.; Gommeaux, M.; Maslov, A. V.; Grazhdankin, D. V. (2017). "Arumberiamorph structure in modern microbial mats: Implications for Ediacaran palaeobiology". Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France. 188 (1–2): 5. doi:10.1051/bsgf/2017006.
  8. 1 2 3 Arrouy, M. J.; Warren, L. V.; Quaglio, F.; Poiré, D. G.; Simões, M. G.; Rosa, M. B.; Peral, L. E. G. (2016). "Ediacaran discs from South America: Probable soft-bodied macrofossils unlock the paleogeography of the Clymene Ocean". Scientific Reports. 6: 30590. Bibcode:2016NatSR...630590A. doi:10.1038/srep30590. PMC   4962044 . PMID   27460966.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Davies, N. S.; Liu, A. G.; Gibling, M. R.; Miller, R. F. (2016). "Resolving MISS conceptions and misconceptions: A geological approach to sedimentary surface textures generated by microbial and abiotic processes". Earth-Science Reviews. 154: 210–246. Bibcode:2016ESRv..154..210D. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.01.005. hdl: 1983/bd67cb45-b022-4db0-be3d-b2977d2b81ab . S2CID   56345018.
  10. ↑ Brasier, M. D. (1979). "The Cambrian radiation event". The origin of major invertebrate groups. London, New York: Academic Press. pp. 103–159.
  11. ↑ Dzulynski, S.; Walton, E. K. (1965). Sedimentary Features of Flysch and Greywackes. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 282. ISBN   9780080869179.
  12. ↑ Allen, J. R. L. (1982). Sedimentary structures, their character and physical basis. Part II. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 1–676.
  13. ↑ Kolesnikov, A. V.; Marusin, V. V.; Nagovitsin, K. E.; Maslov, A. V.; Grazhdankin, D. V. (2015). "Ediacaran biota in the aftermath of the Kotlinian Crisis: Asha Group of the South Urals". Precambrian Research. 263: 59–78. Bibcode:2015PreR..263...59K. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2015.03.011.
  14. 1 2 Gehling, J. G. (1999). "Microbial Mats in Terminal Proterozoic Siliciclastics: Ediacaran Death Masks". PALAIOS. 14 (1): 40–57. Bibcode:1999Palai..14...40G. doi:10.2307/3515360. JSTOR   3515360.
  15. ↑ Kumar, S.; Pandey, S. K. (2008). "Arumberia banksi and associated fossils from the Neoproterozoic Maihar Sandstone, Vindhyan Supergroup, Central India". Journal of the Palaeontological Society of India. 53 (1): 83–97.
  16. ↑ Kumar, S.; Ahmad, S. (2014). "Microbially induced sedimentary structures (MISS) from the Ediacaran Jodhpur Sandstone, Marwar Supergroup, western Rajasthan". Journal of Asian Earth Sciences. 91: 352–361. Bibcode:2014JAESc..91..352K. doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2014.01.009.
  17. ↑ Seilacher, A. (2007). – Trace fossil analysis. – Springer-Verlag (Berlin).
  18. 1 2 Retallack, G. J. (1994). "Were the Ediacaran Fossils Lichens?" (PDF). Paleobiology. 20 (4): 523–544. Bibcode:1994Pbio...20..523R. doi:10.1017/S0094837300012975. JSTOR   2401233. S2CID   129180481.
  19. 1 2 Retallack, G. J. (2012). "Criteria for Distinguishing Microbial Mats and Earths". In Nora Noffke; Henry Chafetz (eds.). Microbial Mats in Silicilastic Depositional Systems Through Time. SEPM Special Publication. Vol. 101. pp. 139–152. doi:10.2110/sepmsp.101.139. ISBN   978-1-56576-314-2.
  20. 1 2 Retallack, G. J. (2012). "Were Ediacaran siliciclastics of South Australia coastal or deep marine?". Sedimentology. 59 (4): 1208–1236. Bibcode:2012Sedim..59.1208R. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3091.2011.01302.x. S2CID   129547681.
  21. 1 2 3 Retallack, G. J. (2013). "Ediacaran life on land". Nature. 493 (7430): 89–92. Bibcode:2013Natur.493...89R. doi:10.1038/nature11777. PMID   23235827. S2CID   205232092.
  22. ↑ Gehling, J. G. (2000). "Environmental interpretation and a sequence stratigraphic framework for the terminal Proterozoic Ediacara Member within the Rawnsley Quartzite, South Australia". Precambrian Research. 100 (1–3): 65–95. Bibcode:2000PreR..100...65G. doi:10.1016/S0301-9268(99)00069-8.
  23. ↑ Gehling, J. G.; Droser, M. L. (2012). "Ediacaran stratigraphy and the biota of the Adelaide Geosyncline, South Australia". Episodes. 35: 236–246. doi: 10.18814/epiiugs/2012/v35i1/023 . S2CID   129497585.
  24. 1 2 Pehr, K.; Love, G. D.; Kuznetsov, A.; Podkovyrov, V.; Junium, C. K.; Shumlyanskyy, L.; Sokur, T.; Bekker, A. (2018). "Ediacara biota flourished in oligotrophic and bacterially dominated marine environments across Baltica". Nature Communications. 9 (1): 1807. Bibcode:2018NatCo...9.1807P. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04195-8. PMC   5935690 . PMID   29728614.
  25. ↑ Danelian, T.; Jolivet, M.; Ionov, D. (2017). "An introduction to the special issue of the BSGF". Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France. 188 (1–2): E1. doi: 10.1051/bsgf/2017001 .
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 Mapstone, N. B.; McIlroy, D. (2006). "Ediacaran fossil preservation: Taphonomy and diagenesis of a discoid biota from the Amadeus Basin, central Australia". Precambrian Research. 149 (3–4): 126–148. Bibcode:2006PreR..149..126M. doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2006.05.007.
  27. 1 2 Tarhan, L. G.; Hood, A. V. S.; Droser, M. L.; Gehling, J. G.; Briggs, D. E. G. (2016). "Exceptional preservation of soft-bodied Ediacara Biota promoted by silica-rich oceans". Geology. 44 (11): 951–954. Bibcode:2016Geo....44..951T. doi:10.1130/G38542.1.
  28. ↑ Dzik, J.; Ivantsov, A. Yu. (2002). "Internal anatomy of a new Precambrian dickinsoniid dipleurozoan from northern Russia" (PDF). Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Monatshefte. 2002 (7): 385–396. doi:10.1127/njgpm/2002/2002/385.
  29. 1 2 Liu, A. G. (2016). "Framboidal Pyrite Shroud Confirms the 'Death Mask' Model for Moldic Preservation of Ediacaran Soft-Bodied Organisms". PALAIOS. 31 (5): 259–274. Bibcode:2016Palai..31..259L. doi:10.2110/palo.2015.095. hdl: 1983/535d288a-68ee-4481-8553-6b7d2e45dacb . S2CID   132601490.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.