Bridge management system

Last updated
Drone view of a bridge during a visual inspection for structural health assessment. Drone view of a bridge during an inspection.jpg
Drone view of a bridge during a visual inspection for structural health assessment.

A bridge management system (BMS) is a set of methodologies and procedures for managing information about bridges. Such system is capable of document and process data along the entire life cycle of the structure steps: project design, construction, monitoring, maintenance and end of operation. [1] [2]

Contents

First used in literature in 1987, the acronym BMS is commonly used in structural engineering to refer to a single or a combination of digital tools and software that support the documentation of every practice related to the single structure. [3] Such software architecture has to meet the needs of road asset managers interested on tracking the serviceability status of bridges through a workflow mainly based on 4 components: data inventory, cost and construction management, structural analysis and assessment and maintenance planning. [1] The implementation of BMS usually is built on top of relational databases, geographic information systems (GIS) and building information modeling platform (BIM) also named bridge information modeling (BrIM) [4] with photogrammetric and laser scanning processing software used for the management of data collected during targeted inspections. The output of the whole procedure, as stated also in some national guidelines of different countries, usually consists of a prioritization of intervention on bridges classified in different risk level according to information collected and processed. [5] [4]

History

Since the late 1980s the structural health assessment and monitoring of bridges represented a critical topic in the field of civil infrastructure management. [6] In the 1990s, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) of the United States promoted and sponsored PONTIS and BRIDGEIT, two computerized platforms for viaduct inventory and monitoring named BMSs. [2] [6] In the following years, also outside the U.S., the growing need of an organized and digitized road asset management has led responsible national agencies to adopt increasingly complex solutions able to meet their objectives, such as building inventories and inspection databases, planning for maintenance, repair and rehabilitation interventions in a systematic way, optimizing the allocation of financial resources, and increasing the safety of bridge users. [1] Moreover, as of 2020s, the occurrence of some significant bridge collapse events and an increased sensitivity to the environmental impact of large structure management operations has led some national authorities such as France and Italy to the designation of national guidelines with detailed guidance for the development and adoption of multilevel BMS to optimize bridge management. [7] [8] [5]

System components

Researchers in the field of structural engineering have identified 4 main components for the implementation of a functional BMS: [1]

Data inventory

Data and information referring to each life cycle step of bridges need to be collected and archived through a flexible approach, making possible to efficiently update and access them. In commonly used BMS, such goal is achieved adopting database solutions that allows the documentation of data in different formats such as texts, images, three-dimensional models and more. [1] Indeed, the inventory usually includes technical drawings of the original project design, written reports from periodical in-situ inspections, numerical observation series of measurements recorded by installed sensors but also geo-referenced data about the structure site as well as 3D scaled model that document the actual state of the bridge. [9]

While the collection of historical documentation and project design of the structure is represented by analogical and digital archives managed by road asset managers, the geometric data input implies the application of topographic techniques through dedicated surveys on the field. In particular, bridge inspections for the 3D reconstruction of a digital twin of the structure usually consists of survey campaigns using global navigation satellite system measurements, ground and drone-based photogrammetry and laser scanning. Data management in this phase implies the use of geographic information systems, BIM and computer-aided design software, manipulating both 2D and 3D geo-referenced data. Resulting products include point clouds and meshes that serves as the basis for building information modeling processes. Bridge surveys can be repeated in different steps of the structure life cycle and their frequency depends on decision making and prioritization of maintenance operation and national guidelines. [1]

In addition to visual geomatic inspections, other nondestructive evaluation techniques are commonly adopted, allowing to collect data not limited to the accurate geometric reconstruction of the structure but also to the material conditions. In this case, the adoption of ground penetrating radar for detection of deterioration of the reinforcement in decks and infrared thermography for identification of delamination and degradation of bridge components is well documented in academic research and considered a complementary step to traditional visual inspection approaches. [10]

Cost and construction management

An accurate implementation of a virtual digital twin or a BIM model of a structure is considered the starting point for budget management and optimization since the early stage studies on BMS. For example, it provides the opportunity to calculate the total cost materials and specialized operator needed in the construction step, quantifying in advance the expenses and consequently adopting better economic strategies. [11] Moreover, a multi-temporal management of information referenced to specific portions of the bridge enables the possibility to define efficient time tables for material delivery planning, project progress monitoring and documentation, construction schedule improvement and workers and experts coordination. [12] In recent BMS applications, sustainability also plays a crucial role in the definition of procedures for cost optimization adopting dedicated approaches such as Life Cycle Assessment, calculation of carbon-footprint and energy consumption along the different phase of the bridge life cycle. [8]

Structural analysis and assessment

Example of a structural analysis of a bridge in a FEM environment. Puente atirantado CivilFEM.png
Example of a structural analysis of a bridge in a FEM environment.

Visual inspection often result in large amounts of data stored in the BMS inventory that serve as input for image-based processes for defect and damage detection. While traditional method for simply relied on human evaluation, Computer Vision techniques taking advantage of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning semi-automatize the extraction of meaningful information from pictures taken during inspections. [13] For example, recent applications of semantic segmentation allows the identification of elements affected by corrosion or other degradation phenomena, [14] enabling experts to assign a grade of severity for the damage. [1] Additional insights on the structure conditions are given by numerical simulations on fatigue behavior with finite element method modeling. This case is particularly valuable when data from in-depth detailed inspections or load tests are available, providing a rich information inventory also for computing simulations on stress behaviors and mechanics. [15] [1]

At a larger territorial scale, a similar grading approach is also applied to the evaluation of the whole road network context in which the single structure analyzed is located. Such quantitative analysis are usually connected to the evaluation of road surface deformations with InSAR technologies or to calculation and prediction of the average daily traffic flow in GIS environments. [16] [17]

All the results coming from analysis, simulations and severity level classifications serve as input for the execution of the intervention prioritization, the core part of the maintenance planning component in a BMS framework. [4] [1]

Maintenance planning

Targeted special inspection of a bridge deck. Bridge Inspection - geograph.org.uk - 1602903.jpg
Targeted special inspection of a bridge deck.

The definition of operation schedule and more detailed inspection is a key function in the decision making process of a BMS. Based on quantitative and qualitative data acquired during routine inspections and along the processing of information in the structural analyze phase, BMS users need to identify priority interventions through a dedicated maintenance plan. This goal is achieved with the implementation of platforms and tools that enable stakeholders to explore data, results and observations and link them to detailed fact sheets reporting the health conditions of each structural elements of the bridge. [4]

Prioritization of intervention on single elements or on the whole structure is determined through a multi-criteria approach that consider the risk of defect or collapse. In particular, the process usually implies the computation of indexes for quantifying hazard, vulnerability and value exposure and derives from them a warning class. [7] Warning classes then serve as parameters for prioritizing the allocation of funds and operators for further detailed and more frequent monitoring approaches for structures at risk. As a result, bridges whose structural integrity and serviceability are more affected are classified in higher warning classes, requiring targeted interventions. This operation is essential to determine if special inspections with expert operators and specific tests (e.g. load tests) are required and if any new or additional sensors (e.g. extensometer, accelerometer) for continuous monitoring need to be installed on the structures for targeted monitoring. [7]

National guidelines

In order to assess and quantify the health condition of the bridges located in their national territory, many countries have formulated a series of general indications and guidelines for the implementation of dedicated bridge management systems.

France

In 2019, the French Centre for Studies on Risks, the Environment, Mobility and Urban Planning (CEREMA) in collaboration with the French Institute of Science and Technology for Transport, Development and Networks issued the national guidelines, proposing a multilevel methodology for the assessment and management of the risk of failure due to scour for bridges with foundations in water. The current version of the French guidelines only refers to bridge scour and hydraulic risk.The proposed methodology runs on 4 levels: [5]

  1. Summary analysis: qualitative risk analysis on a large scale and classification of the structure into three risk classes: low, medium, and high;
  2. Simplified analysis: semi-quantitative analysis on bridges previously classified in the medium and high level of risk;
  3. Detailed analysis: in-depth studies on high-risk structures with numerical modeling approaches
  4. Risk management: identification of actions to improve the conditions and/or reduce the sensitivity of critical bridges.

Italy

Collapsed Morandi Bridge in August 2018 in Genova (Italy). Il Ponte Morandi dopo il crollo, visto da Est, panoramica (cropped).jpg
Collapsed Morandi Bridge in August 2018 in Genova (Italy).

Ensuring the safety and well-being of these road infrastructures has become an urgent matter in Italy, especially after the evidence of bridge collapses occurred in the last decade. [18] In response to the need for reliable and up-to-date information regarding bridge conditions, in 2020 the Italian Superior Council of Public Works has developed the Guidelines on Risk Classification and Management. [19] These guidelines establish a multi-level approach for documenting bridge characteristics, assessing their health through visual inspection and damage identification, and determining their risk classification based on hazard, exposure and vulnerability derived from the previous steps. [5] Subsequently, depending on the assigned class, the number of investigation levels required to evaluate the structure's safety is determined. Road asset managers are then asked to establish and maintain a management system able to track in time interventions, documenting defects assessed on different portion of the bridge as well as environmental site conditions (hydraulics, geology, seismology). The guidelines identifies six levels: [7]

1. Collection of available data about bridge construction, accessing existing archives;
2. Visual inspection reports about structure geometry and bridge elements conditions;
3. Risk classification of the structure in one of the five attention classes, i.e., low, medium-low, medium, medium-high, and high;
4. Simplified safety assessment for bridges in medium or medium-high attention class;
5. Accurate safety assessment for bridges in the high attention class;
6. Resilience analysis at the network level. (Only drafted in the current version of the guidelines). [5]

Examples

The below are examples of commonly used bridge management software:

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Risk management</span> Identification, evaluation and control of risks

Risk management is the identification, evaluation, and prioritization of risks, followed by the minimization, monitoring, and control of the impact or probability of those risks occurring.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seismic risk</span> Likelihood of damage to a building or system from an earthquake

Seismic risk or earthquake risk is the potential impact on the built environment and on people's well-being due to future earthquakes. Seismic risk has been defined, for most management purposes, as the potential economic, social and environmental consequences of hazardous events that may occur in a specified period of time. A building located in a region of high seismic hazard is at lower risk if it is built to sound seismic engineering principles. On the other hand, a building located in a region with a history of minor seismicity, in a brick building located on fill subject to liquefaction can be as high or higher risk.

In the field of science and engineering, root cause analysis (RCA) is a method of problem solving used for identifying the root causes of faults or problems. It is widely used in IT operations, manufacturing, telecommunications, industrial process control, accident analysis, medicine, healthcare industry, etc. Root cause analysis is a form of inductive and deductive inference.

Pontis is a software application developed to assist in managing highway bridges and other structures. Known as AASHTOWare Bridge Management since version 5.2, Pontis stores bridge inspection and inventory data based on the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) National Bridge Inventory system coding guidelines. In addition, the system stores condition data for each of a bridge's structural elements.

Reliability engineering is a sub-discipline of systems engineering that emphasizes the ability of equipment to function without failure. Reliability is defined as the probability that a product, system, or service will perform its intended function adequately for a specified period of time, OR will operate in a defined environment without failure. Reliability is closely related to availability, which is typically described as the ability of a component or system to function at a specified moment or interval of time.

The National Bridge Inventory (NBI) is a database, compiled by the Federal Highway Administration, with information on all bridges and tunnels in the United States that have roads passing above or below them. That is similar to the grade-crossing identifier number database, compiled by the Federal Railroad Administration, which identifies all railroad crossings. The bridge information includes the design of the bridge and the dimensions of the usable portion. The data is often used to analyze bridges and to judge their condition. The inventory is developed for the purpose of having a unified database for bridges to ensure the safety of the traveling public, as required by the Federal Aid Highway Act of 1968. It includes identification information, bridge types and specifications, operational conditions, bridge data including geometric data and functional description, and inspection data. Any bridge more than 20 ft long used for vehicular traffic is included.

Earthquake engineering is an interdisciplinary branch of engineering that designs and analyzes structures, such as buildings and bridges, with earthquakes in mind. Its overall goal is to make such structures more resistant to earthquakes. An earthquake engineer aims to construct structures that will not be damaged in minor shaking and will avoid serious damage or collapse in a major earthquake. A properly engineered structure does not necessarily have to be extremely strong or expensive. It has to be properly designed to withstand the seismic effects while sustaining an acceptable level of damage.

Structural health monitoring (SHM) involves the observation and analysis of a system over time using periodically sampled response measurements to monitor changes to the material and geometric properties of engineering structures such as bridges and buildings.

A hazard analysis is one of many methods that may be used to assess risk. At its core, the process entails describing a system object that intends to conduct some activity. During the performance of that activity, an adverse event may be encountered that could cause or contribute to an occurrence. Finally, that occurrence will result in some outcome that may be measured in terms of the degree of loss or harm. This outcome may be measured on a continuous scale, such as an amount of monetary loss, or the outcomes may be categorized into various levels of severity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Building information modeling</span> Process used to design and document building and infrastructure designs

Building information modeling (BIM) is a process involving the generation and management of digital representations of the physical and functional characteristics of buildings and other physical assets. BIM is supported by various tools, technologies and contracts. Building information models (BIMs) are computer files which can be extracted, exchanged or networked to support decision-making regarding a built asset. BIM software is used by individuals, businesses and government agencies who plan, design, construct, operate and maintain buildings and diverse physical infrastructures, such as water, refuse, electricity, gas, communication utilities, roads, railways, bridges, ports and tunnels.

Asset management is a systematic approach to the governance and realization of all value for which a group or entity is responsible. It may apply both to tangible assets and to intangible assets. Asset management is a systematic process of developing, operating, maintaining, upgrading, and disposing of assets in the most cost-effective manner.

Medical equipment management is a term for the professionals who manage operations, analyze and improve utilization and safety, and support servicing healthcare technology. These healthcare technology managers are, much like other healthcare professionals referred to by various specialty or organizational hierarchy names.

Pavement management is the process of planning the maintenance and repair of a network of roadways or other paved facilities in order to optimize pavement conditions over the entire network.

Technical Integrity Engineering, also known as Asset Integrity, involves various engineering disciplines that focus on ensuring a product, process, or system meets its intended requirements when used. Applying these disciplines to reduce costs, maintain schedules, manage technical risks, and handle legal concerns during a project's entire life cycle ensures operational safety and efficiency in e.g., Oil and Gas, Power Generation, and Nuclear Power industries.

Software diagnosis refers to concepts, techniques, and tools that allow for obtaining findings, conclusions, and evaluations about software systems and their implementation, composition, behaviour, and evolution. It serves as means to monitor, steer, observe and optimize software development, software maintenance, and software re-engineering in the sense of a business intelligence approach specific to software systems. It is generally based on the automatic extraction, analysis, and visualization of corresponding information sources of the software system. It can also be manually done and not automatic.

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a set of voluntary guidelines designed to help organizations assess and improve their ability to prevent, detect, and respond to cybersecurity risks. Developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the framework was initially published in 2014 for critical infrastructure sectors but has since been widely adopted across various industries, including government and private enterprises globally. The framework integrates existing standards, guidelines, and best practices to provide a structured approach to cybersecurity risk management.

The industrial internet of things (IIoT) refers to interconnected sensors, instruments, and other devices networked together with computers' industrial applications, including manufacturing and energy management. This connectivity allows for data collection, exchange, and analysis, potentially facilitating improvements in productivity and efficiency as well as other economic benefits. The IIoT is an evolution of a distributed control system (DCS) that allows for a higher degree of automation by using cloud computing to refine and optimize the process controls.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ahsan Kareem</span>

Ahsan Kareem is the Robert M. Moran Professor of Engineering in the Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering and Earth Sciences (CEEES) at the University of Notre Dame. He is Director of the Nathaz Modeling Laboratory and served as the past Chair at the Department of CEEES at the University of Notre Dame.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deterioration modeling</span> Engineering formula

Deterioration modeling is the process of modeling and predicting the physical conditions of equipment, structures, infrastructure or any other physical assets. The condition of infrastructure is represented either using a deterministic index or the probability of failure. Examples of such performance measures are pavement condition index for roads or bridge condition index for bridges. For probabilistic measures, which are the focus of reliability theory, probability of failure or reliability index are used. Deterioration models are instrumental to infrastructure asset management and are the basis for maintenance and rehabilitation decision-making. The condition of all physical infrastructure degrade over time. A deterioration model can help decision-makers to understand how fast the condition drops or violates a certain threshold.

thumb

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Dayan, Vandad; Chileshe, Nicholas; Hassanli, Reza (2022). "A Scoping Review of Information-Modeling Development in Bridge Management Systems". Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 148 (9). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002340. ISSN   0733-9364. S2CID   250152261.
  2. 1 2 Hawk, Hugh; Small, Edgar P. (1998). "The BRIDGIT Bridge Management System". Structural Engineering International. 8 (4): 309–314. doi:10.2749/101686698780488712. ISSN   1016-8664.
  3. ↑ Hudson, S. W.; Carmichael III, R. F.; Moser, L. O.; Hudson, W. R.; Wilkes, W. J. (1987). "BRIDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS". NCHRP Report (300). ISSN   0077-5614.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Mohammadi, Masoud; Rashidi, Maria; Mousavi, Vahid; Yu, Yang; Samali, Bijan (2022). "Application of TLS Method in Digitization of Bridge Infrastructures: A Path to BrIM Development". Remote Sensing. 14 (5): 1148. doi: 10.3390/rs14051148 . ISSN   2072-4292.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Giordano, P.F.; Turksezer, Z.I.; Limongelli, M.P. (2022-06-27), "Risk-based scour assessment of bridges: Italian VS French guidelines", Bridge Safety, Maintenance, Management, Life-Cycle, Resilience and Sustainability (1 ed.), London: CRC Press, pp. 1393–1399, doi:10.1201/9781003322641-169, ISBN   978-1-003-32264-1 , retrieved 2023-07-05
  6. 1 2 Thompson, Paul D.; Small, Edgar P.; Johnson, Michael; Marshall, Allen R. (1998). "The Pontis Bridge Management System". Structural Engineering International. 8 (4): 303–308. doi:10.2749/101686698780488758. ISSN   1016-8664.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Natali, Agnese; Cosentino, Antonella; Morelli, Francesco; Salvatore, Walter (2023). "Multilevel Approach for Management of Existing Bridges: Critical Analysis and Application of the Italian Guidelines with the New Operating Instructions". Infrastructures. 8 (4): 70. doi: 10.3390/infrastructures8040070 . ISSN   2412-3811.
  8. 1 2 Kaewunruen, Sakdirat; Sresakoolchai, Jessada; Zhou, Zhihao (2020). "Sustainability-Based Lifecycle Management for Bridge Infrastructure Using 6D BIM". Sustainability. 12 (6): 2436. doi: 10.3390/su12062436 . ISSN   2071-1050.
  9. ↑ Shim, Chang-Su; Dang, Ngoc-Son; Lon, Sokanya; Jeon, Chi-Ho (2019). "Development of a bridge maintenance system for prestressed concrete bridges using 3D digital twin model". Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 15 (10): 1319–1332. doi:10.1080/15732479.2019.1620789. ISSN   1573-2479. S2CID   191152354.
  10. ↑ Abdallah, Abdelrahman M.; Atadero, Rebecca A.; Ozbek, Mehmet E. (2022). "A State-of-the-Art Review of Bridge Inspection Planning: Current Situation and Future Needs". Journal of Bridge Engineering. 27 (2). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001812. ISSN   1084-0702. S2CID   244515687.
  11. ↑ Orcesi, André D.; Frangopol, Dan M. (2010). "Optimization of Bridge Management under Budget Constraints: Role of Structural Health Monitoring". Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2202 (1): 148–158. doi:10.3141/2202-18. ISSN   0361-1981. S2CID   109515237.
  12. ↑ Zou, Yang; Kiviniemi, Arto; Jones, Stephen W.; Walsh, James (2019-02-01). "Risk Information Management for Bridges by Integrating Risk Breakdown Structure into 3D/4D BIM". KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 23 (2): 467–480. doi:10.1007/s12205-018-1924-3. ISSN   1976-3808. S2CID   255540775.
  13. ↑ Chen, Jieh-Haur; Su, Mu-Chun; Cao, Ruijun; Hsu, Shu-Chien; Lu, Jin-Chun (2017-01-01). "A self organizing map optimization based image recognition and processing model for bridge crack inspection". Automation in Construction. 73: 58–66. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2016.08.033. hdl: 10397/101282 . ISSN   0926-5805.
  14. ↑ Ahuja, Sanjay Kumar; Shukla, Manoj Kumar (2018). "A Survey of Computer Vision Based Corrosion Detection Approaches". In Satapathy, Suresh Chandra; Joshi, Amit (eds.). Information and Communication Technology for Intelligent Systems (ICTIS 2017) - Volume 2. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. Vol. 84. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 55–63. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63645-0_6. ISBN   978-3-319-63645-0.
  15. ↑ Zhu, Zhiwen; Xiang, Ze; Li, Jianpeng; Huang, Yan; Ruan, Shipeng (2020-04-15). "Fatigue behavior of orthotropic bridge decks with two types of cutout geometry based on field monitoring and FEM analysis". Engineering Structures. 209: 109926. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109926. ISSN   0141-0296. S2CID   214390583.
  16. ↑ Macchiarulo, Valentina; Milillo, Pietro; Blenkinsopp, Chris; Giardina, Giorgia (2022). "Monitoring deformations of infrastructure networks: A fully automated GIS integration and analysis of InSAR time-series". Structural Health Monitoring. 21 (4): 1849–1878. doi:10.1177/14759217211045912. ISSN   1475-9217. S2CID   245807673.
  17. ↑ Jiang, B.; Liu, C. (2009). "Street-based topological representations and analyses for predicting traffic flow in GIS". International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 23 (9): 1119–1137. arXiv: 0709.1981 . doi:10.1080/13658810701690448. ISSN   1365-8816. S2CID   32772999.
  18. ↑ Calvi, Gian Michele; Moratti, Matteo; O'Reilly, Gerard J.; Scattarreggia, Nicola; Monteiro, Ricardo; Malomo, Daniele; Calvi, Paolo Martino; Pinho, Rui (2019-04-03). "Once upon a Time in Italy: The Tale of the Morandi Bridge". Structural Engineering International. 29 (2): 198–217. doi:10.1080/10168664.2018.1558033. ISSN   1016-8664. S2CID   116753139.
  19. ↑ Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici (2020). "Linee Guida per la classificazione e gestione del rischio, la valutazione della sicurezza ed il monitoraggio dei ponti esistenti". Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti. Retrieved 2023-07-05.
  20. 1 2 "AASHTOWare Bridge" . Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  21. ↑ Paulo J. da Sousa Cruz; Dan M. Frangopol; Luis C. Canhoto Neves, eds. (2015-03-11). Advances in Bridge Maintenance, Safety Management, and Life-Cycle Performance. Third International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, 16-19 July 2006, Porto, Portugal - IABMAS '06. London: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/b18175. ISBN   978-0-429-15809-4.
  22. ↑ "SwissInspect - Create Digital Twins of Infrastructure". www.swissinspect.io. Retrieved 2023-07-06.
  23. ↑ "INBEE". Inbee (in Italian). Retrieved 2023-07-06.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.