Carlyle circle

Last updated

In mathematics, a Carlyle circle (named for Thomas Carlyle) is a certain circle in a coordinate plane associated with a quadratic equation. The circle has the property that the solutions of the quadratic equation are the horizontal coordinates of the intersections of the circle with the horizontal axis. Carlyle circles have been used to develop ruler-and-compass constructions of regular polygons.

Contents

Definition

Carlyle circle of the quadratic equation x - sx + p = 0. CarlyleCircle.svg
Carlyle circle of the quadratic equation x  sx + p = 0.

Given the quadratic equation

x2  sx + p = 0

the circle in the coordinate plane having the line segment joining the points A(0,1) and B(s, p) as a diameter is called the Carlyle circle of the quadratic equation. [1] [2] [3]

Defining property

The defining property of the Carlyle circle can be established thus: the equation of the circle having the line segment AB as diameter is

x(x  s) + (y  1)(y  p) = 0.

The abscissas of the points where the circle intersects the x-axis are the roots of the equation (obtained by setting y = 0 in the equation of the circle)

x2  sx + p = 0.

Construction of regular polygons

Construction of regular pentagon using Carlyle circles Regular Pentagon Using Carlyle Circle.gif
Construction of regular pentagon using Carlyle circles
Construction of a regular heptadecagon using Carlyle circles Regular Heptadecagon Using Carlyle Circle.gif
Construction of a regular heptadecagon using Carlyle circles
Construction of a regular 257-gon using Carlyle circles Regular 257-gon Using Carlyle Circle.gif
Construction of a regular 257-gon using Carlyle circles

Regular pentagon

The problem of constructing a regular pentagon is equivalent to the problem of constructing the roots of the equation

z5  1 = 0.

One root of this equation is z0 = 1 which corresponds to the point P0(1, 0). Removing the factor corresponding to this root, the other roots turn out to be roots of the equation

z4 + z3 + z2 + z + 1 = 0.

These roots can be represented in the form ω, ω2, ω3, ω4 where ω = exp (2iπ/5). Let these correspond to the points P1, P2, P3, P4. Letting

p1 = ω + ω4, p2 = ω2 + ω3

we have

p1 + p2 = 1, p1p2 = −1. (These can be quickly shown to be true by direct substitution into the quartic above and noting that ω6 = ω, and ω7 = ω2.)

So p1 and p2 are the roots of the quadratic equation

x2 + x  1 = 0.

The Carlyle circle associated with this quadratic has a diameter with endpoints at (0, 1) and (−1, −1) and center at (−1/2, 0). Carlyle circles are used to construct p1 and p2. From the definitions of p1 and p2 it also follows that

p1 = 2cos(2π/5), p2 = 2cos(4π/5).

These are then used to construct the points P1, P2, P3, P4.

This detailed procedure involving Carlyle circles for the construction of regular pentagons is given below. [3]

  1. Draw a circle in which to inscribe the pentagon and mark the center point O.
  2. Draw a horizontal line through the center of the circle. Mark one intersection with the circle as point B.
  3. Construct a vertical line through the center. Mark one intersection with the circle as point A.
  4. Construct the point M as the midpoint of O and B.
  5. Draw a circle centered at M through the point A. This is the Carlyle circle for x2 + x  1 = 0. Mark its intersection with the horizontal line (inside the original circle) as the point W and its intersection outside the circle as the point V. These are the points p1 and p2 mentioned above.
  6. Draw a circle of radius OA and center W. It intersects the original circle at two of the vertices of the pentagon.
  7. Draw a circle of radius OA and center V. It intersects the original circle at two of the vertices of the pentagon.
  8. The fifth vertex is the intersection of the horizontal axis with the original circle.

Regular heptadecagon

There is a similar method involving Carlyle circles to construct regular heptadecagons. [3] The figure to the right illustrates the procedure.

Regular 257-gon

To construct a regular 257-gon using Carlyle circles, as many as 24 Carlyle circles are to be constructed. One of these is the circle to solve the quadratic equation x2 + x  64 = 0. [3]

Regular 65537-gon

There is a procedure involving Carlyle circles for the construction of a regular 65537-gon. However there are practical problems for the implementation of the procedure; for example, it requires the construction of the Carlyle circle for the solution of the quadratic equation x2 + x  214 = 0. [3]

History

Carlyle's solution to Leslie's problem. The black line segment is divided in two segments in such a way that the two segments form a rectangle (green) being of equal area to another given rectangle (red). Carlyle circle original problem.svg
Carlyle's solution to Leslie's problem. The black line segment is divided in two segments in such a way that the two segments form a rectangle (green) being of equal area to another given rectangle (red).

According to Howard Eves (1911–2004), the mathematician John Leslie (1766–1832) described the geometric construction of roots of a quadratic equation with a circle in his book Elements of Geometry and noted that this idea was provided by his former student Thomas Carlyle (1795–1881). [4] However while the description in Leslie's book contains an analogous circle construction, it was presented solely in elementary geometric terms without the notion of a Cartesian coordinate system or a quadratic function and its roots: [5]

To divide a straight line, whether internally or externally, so that the rectangle under its segments shall be equivalent to a given rectangle.

John Leslie, Elements of Geometry, prop. XVII, p. 176 [5]

In 1867 the Austrian engineer Eduard Lill published a graphical method to determine the roots of a polynomial (Lill's method). If it is applied on a quadratic function, then it yields the trapezoid figure from Carlyle's solution to Leslie's problem (see graphic) with one of its sides being the diameter of the Carlyle circle. In an article from 1925 G. A. Miller pointed out that a slight modification of Lill's method applied to a normed quadratic function yields a circle that allows the geometric construction of the roots of that function and gave the explicit modern definition of what was later to be called Carlyle circle. [6]

Eves used the circle in the modern sense in one of the exercises of his book Introduction to the History of Mathematics (1953) and pointed out the connection to Leslie and Carlyle. [4] Later publications started to adopt the names Carlyle circle, Carlyle method or Carlyle algorithm, though in German speaking countries the term Lill circle (Lill-Kreis) is used as well. [7] DeTemple used in 1989 and 1991 Carlyle circles to devise compass-and-straightedge constructions for regular polygons, in particular the pentagon, the heptadecagon, the 257-gon and the 65537-gon. Ladislav Beran described in 1999 how the Carlyle circle can be used to construct the complex roots of a normed quadratic function. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Analytic geometry</span> Study of geometry using a coordinate system

In mathematics, analytic geometry, also known as coordinate geometry or Cartesian geometry, is the study of geometry using a coordinate system. This contrasts with synthetic geometry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constructible number</span> Number constructible via compass and straightedge

In geometry and algebra, a real number is constructible if and only if, given a line segment of unit length, a line segment of length can be constructed with compass and straightedge in a finite number of steps. Equivalently, is constructible if and only if there is a closed-form expression for using only integers and the operations for addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, and square roots.

In algebra, a quadratic equation is any equation that can be rearranged in standard form as

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Straightedge and compass construction</span> Method of drawing geometric objects

In geometry, straightedge-and-compass construction – also known as ruler-and-compass construction, Euclidean construction, or classical construction – is the construction of lengths, angles, and other geometric figures using only an idealized ruler and a pair of compasses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doubling the cube</span> Ancient geometric construction problem

Doubling the cube, also known as the Delian problem, is an ancient geometric problem. Given the edge of a cube, the problem requires the construction of the edge of a second cube whose volume is double that of the first. As with the related problems of squaring the circle and trisecting the angle, doubling the cube is now known to be impossible to construct by using only a compass and straightedge, but even in ancient times solutions were known that employed other tools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cubic equation</span> Polynomial equation of degree 3

In algebra, a cubic equation in one variable is an equation of the form

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heptadecagon</span> Polygon with 17 edges

In geometry, a heptadecagon, septadecagon or 17-gon is a seventeen-sided polygon.

The Huzita–Justin axioms or Huzita–Hatori axioms are a set of rules related to the mathematical principles of origami, describing the operations that can be made when folding a piece of paper. The axioms assume that the operations are completed on a plane, and that all folds are linear. These are not a minimal set of axioms but rather the complete set of possible single folds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Decagon</span> Shape with ten sides

In geometry, a decagon is a ten-sided polygon or 10-gon. The total sum of the interior angles of a simple decagon is 1440°.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constructible polygon</span> Regular polygon that can be constructed with compass and straightedge

In mathematics, a constructible polygon is a regular polygon that can be constructed with compass and straightedge. For example, a regular pentagon is constructible with compass and straightedge while a regular heptagon is not. There are infinitely many constructible polygons, but only 31 with an odd number of sides are known.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Problem of Apollonius</span> Construct circles that are tangent to three given circles in a plane

In Euclidean plane geometry, Apollonius's problem is to construct circles that are tangent to three given circles in a plane (Figure 1). Apollonius of Perga posed and solved this famous problem in his work Ἐπαφαί ; this work has been lost, but a 4th-century AD report of his results by Pappus of Alexandria has survived. Three given circles generically have eight different circles that are tangent to them (Figure 2), a pair of solutions for each way to divide the three given circles in two subsets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">257-gon</span>

In geometry, a 257-gon is a polygon with 257 sides. The sum of the interior angles of any non-self-intersecting 257-gon is 45,900°.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">65537-gon</span> Regular polygon

In geometry, a 65537-gon is a polygon with 65,537 (216 + 1) sides. The sum of the interior angles of any non–self-intersecting 65537-gon is 11796300°.

Algebra can essentially be considered as doing computations similar to those of arithmetic but with non-numerical mathematical objects. However, until the 19th century, algebra consisted essentially of the theory of equations. For example, the fundamental theorem of algebra belongs to the theory of equations and is not, nowadays, considered as belonging to algebra.

In algebra, casus irreducibilis is one of the cases that may arise in solving polynomials of degree 3 or higher with integer coefficients algebraically, i.e., by obtaining roots that are expressed with radicals. It shows that many algebraic numbers are real-valued but cannot be expressed in radicals without introducing complex numbers. The most notable occurrence of casus irreducibilis is in the case of cubic polynomials that have three real roots, which was proven by Pierre Wantzel in 1843. One can see whether a given cubic polynomial is in so-called casus irreducibilis by looking at the discriminant, via Cardano's formula.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Conic section</span> Curve from a cone intersecting a plane

A conic section, conic or a quadratic curve is a curve obtained from a cone's surface intersecting a plane. The three types of conic section are the hyperbola, the parabola, and the ellipse; the circle is a special case of the ellipse, though it was sometimes called as a fourth type. The ancient Greek mathematicians studied conic sections, culminating around 200 BC with Apollonius of Perga's systematic work on their properties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pentagon</span> Shape with five sides

In geometry, a pentagon is any five-sided polygon or 5-gon. The sum of the internal angles in a simple pentagon is 540°.

In number theory, a cyclotomic field is a number field obtained by adjoining a complex root of unity to Q, the field of rational numbers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lill's method</span> Graphical method for the real roots of a polynomial

In mathematics, Lill's method is a visual method of finding the real roots of a univariate polynomial of any degree. It was developed by Austrian engineer Eduard Lill in 1867. A later paper by Lill dealt with the problem of complex roots.

In mathematics, and especially differential geometry and mathematical physics, gauge theory is the general study of connections on vector bundles, principal bundles, and fibre bundles. Gauge theory in mathematics should not be confused with the closely related concept of a gauge theory in physics, which is a field theory which admits gauge symmetry. In mathematics theory means a mathematical theory, encapsulating the general study of a collection of concepts or phenomena, whereas in the physical sense a gauge theory is a mathematical model of some natural phenomenon.

References

  1. E. John Hornsby, Jr.: Geometrical and Graphical Solutions of Quadratic Equations. The College Mathematics Journal, Vol. 21, No. 5 (Nov., 1990), pp. 362–369 (JSTOR)
  2. Weisstein, Eric W. "Carlyle Circle". From MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource. Retrieved 21 May 2013.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 DeTemple, Duane W. (Feb 1991). "Carlyle circles and Lemoine simplicity of polygon constructions" (PDF). The American Mathematical Monthly. 98 (2): 97–208. doi:10.2307/2323939. JSTOR   2323939. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-12-21. Retrieved 6 November 2011. (JSTOR)
  4. 1 2 See for instance Hornsby, DeTemple or Howard Eves: An Introduction into the History of Mathematics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 3rd edition, 1969, p. 73
  5. 1 2 John Leslie: Elements of geometry and plane trigonometry: With an appendix, and copious notes and illustrations. Archibald Constable & Co, 3. Ausgabe, 1817, pp. 176, 340 (online copy (Google)). Note that the comment about Carlyle is not contained in earlier editions of the book (1809, 1811).
  6. G. A. Miller: Geometric Solution of the Quadratic Equation. The Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 12, No. 179 (Dec., 1925), pp. 500–501 (JSTOR)
  7. Rainer Kaenders (ed.), Reinhard Schmidt (ed.): Mit GeoGebra mehr Mathematik verstehen. Springer Spektrum, 2nd edition, 2014, ISBN   978-3-658-04222-6, pp. 68-71 (German)
  8. Ladislav Beran: The Complex Roots of a Quadratic from a Circle. The Mathematical Gazette, Vol. 83, No. 497 (Jul., 1999), pp. 287–291 (JSTOR)