Colony-forming unit

Last updated

In microbiology, colony-forming unit (CFU, cfu or Cfu) is a unit which estimates the number of microbial cells (bacteria, fungi, viruses etc.) in a sample that are viable, able to multiply via binary fission under the controlled conditions. Counting with colony-forming units requires culturing the microbes and counts only viable cells, in contrast with microscopic examination which counts all cells, living or dead. The visual appearance of a colony in a cell culture requires significant growth, and when counting colonies, it is uncertain if the colony arose from one cell or a group of cells. Expressing results as colony-forming units reflects this uncertainty.

Contents

Theory

A dilution made with bacteria and peptoned water is placed in an Agar plate (Agar plate count for food samples or Trypticase soy agar for clinic samples) and spread over the plate by tipping in the pattern shown. Mezcla homogenea UFC.PNG
A dilution made with bacteria and peptoned water is placed in an Agar plate (Agar plate count for food samples or Trypticase soy agar for clinic samples) and spread over the plate by tipping in the pattern shown.

The purpose of plate counting is to estimate the number of cells present based on their ability to give rise to colonies under specific conditions of nutrient medium, temperature and time. Theoretically, one viable cell can give rise to a colony through replication. However, solitary cells are the exception in nature, and most likely the progenitor of the colony was a mass of cells deposited together. [1] [2] In addition, many bacteria grow in chains (e.g. Streptococcus ) or clumps (e.g., Staphylococcus ). Estimation of microbial numbers by CFU will, in most cases, undercount the number of living cells present in a sample for these reasons. This is because the counting of CFU assumes that every colony is separate and founded by a single viable microbial cell. [3]

The plate count is linear for E. coli over the range of 30 to 300 CFU on a standard sized Petri dish. [4] Therefore, to ensure that a sample will yield CFU in this range requires dilution of the sample and plating of several dilutions. Typically, ten-fold dilutions are used, and the dilution series is plated in replicates of 2 or 3 over the chosen range of dilutions. Often 100µl are plated but also larger amounts up to 1ml are used. Higher plating volumes increase drying times but often don't result in higher accuracy, since additional dilution steps may be needed. [5] The CFU/plate is read from a plate in the linear range, and then the CFU/g (or CFU/mL) of the original is deduced mathematically, factoring in the amount plated and its dilution factor.

A solution of bacteria at an unknown concentration is often serially diluted in order to obtain at least one plate with a countable number of bacteria. In this figure, the "x10" plate is suitable for counting. Serial dilution and plating of bacteria.jpg
A solution of bacteria at an unknown concentration is often serially diluted in order to obtain at least one plate with a countable number of bacteria. In this figure, the "x10" plate is suitable for counting.

An advantage to this method is that different microbial species may give rise to colonies that are clearly different from each other, both microscopically and macroscopically. The colony morphology can be of great use in the identification of the microorganism present. [6]

A prior understanding of the microscopic anatomy of the organism can give a better understanding of how the observed CFU/mL relates to the number of viable cells per milliliter. Alternatively it is possible to decrease the average number of cells per CFU in some cases by vortexing the sample before conducting the dilution. However many microorganisms are delicate and would suffer a decrease in the proportion of cells that are viable when placed in a vortex. [7]

Log notation

Concentrations of colony-forming units can be expressed using logarithmic notation, where the value shown is the base 10 logarithm of the concentration. [8] [9] [10] This allows the log reduction of a decontamination process to be computed as a simple subtraction.

Uses

Colony-forming units are used to quantify results in many microbiological plating and counting methods, including:

However, with the techniques that require the use of an agar plate, no fluid solution can be used because the purity of the specimen cannot be unidentified and it is not possible to count the cells one by one in the liquid. [13]

Tools for counting colonies

The traditional way of enumerating CFUs with a "click-counter" and a pen. When the colonies are too numerous, it is common practice to count CFUs only on a fraction of the dish. Manual CFU counting.jpg
The traditional way of enumerating CFUs with a "click-counter" and a pen. When the colonies are too numerous, it is common practice to count CFUs only on a fraction of the dish.

Counting colonies is traditionally performed manually using a pen and a click-counter. This is generally a straightforward task, but can become very laborious and time-consuming when many plates have to be enumerated. Alternatively semi-automatic (software) and automatic (hardware + software) solutions can be used. [14] [15] [16]

Software for counting CFUs

Colonies can be enumerated from pictures of plates using software tools. The experimenters would generally take a picture of each plate they need to count and then analyse all the pictures (this can be done with a simple digital camera or even a webcam). Since it takes less than 10 seconds to take a single picture, as opposed to several minutes to count CFU manually, this approach generally saves a lot of time. In addition, it is more objective and allows extraction of other variables such as the size and colour of the colonies. [17]

In addition to software based on traditional desktop computers, apps for both Android and iOS devices are available for semi-automated and automated colony counting. The integrated camera is used to take pictures of the agar plate and either an internal or an external algorithm is used to process the picture data and to estimate the number of colonies. [23] [24] [25] [26]

Automated systems

Many of the automated systems are used to counteract human error as many of the research techniques done by humans counting individual cells have a high chance of error involved. Due to the fact that researchers regularly manually count the cells with the assistance of a transmitted light, this error prone technique can have a significant effect on the calculated concentration in the main liquid medium when the cells are in low numbers. [27]

An automated colony counter using image processing. Quintote colony counter.jpg
An automated colony counter using image processing.

Completely automated systems are also available from some biotechnology manufacturers. [28] [29] They are generally expensive and not as flexible as standalone software since the hardware and software are designed to work together for a specific set-up. [30] Alternatively, some automatic systems use the spiral plating paradigm. [31]

Some of the automated systems such as the systems from MATLAB allow the cells to be counted without having to stain them. This lets the colonies to be reused for other experiments without the risk of killing the microorganisms with stains. However, a disadvantage to these automated systems is that it is extremely difficult to differentiate between the microorganisms with dust or scratches on blood agar plates because both the dust and scratches can create a highly diverse combination of shapes and appearances. [32]

Alternative units

Instead of colony-forming units, the parameters Most Probable Number (MPN) and Modified Fishman Units (MFU) [33] can be used. The Most Probable Number method counts viable cells and is useful when enumerating low concentrations of cells or enumerating microbes in products where particulates make plate counting impractical. [34] Modified Fishman Units take into account bacteria which are viable, but non-culturable.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Agar plate</span> Petri dish with agar used to culture microbes

An agar plate is a Petri dish that contains a growth medium solidified with agar, used to culture microorganisms. Sometimes selective compounds are added to influence growth, such as antibiotics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Replica plating</span>

Replica plating is a microbiological technique in which one or more secondary Petri plates containing different solid (agar-based) selective growth media are inoculated with the same colonies of microorganisms from a primary plate, reproducing the original spatial pattern of colonies. The technique involves pressing a velveteen-covered disk, and then imprinting secondary plates with cells in colonies removed from the original plate by the material. Generally, large numbers of colonies are replica plated due to the difficulty in streaking each out individually onto a separate plate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbiological culture</span> Method of allowing microorganisms to multiply in a controlled medium

A microbiological culture, or microbial culture, is a method of multiplying microbial organisms by letting them reproduce in predetermined culture medium under controlled laboratory conditions. Microbial cultures are foundational and basic diagnostic methods used as research tools in molecular biology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bacteriological water analysis</span>

Bacteriological water analysis is a method of analysing water to estimate the numbers of bacteria present and, if needed, to find out what sort of bacteria they are. It represents one aspect of water quality. It is a microbiological analytical procedure which uses samples of water and from these samples determines the concentration of bacteria. It is then possible to draw inferences about the suitability of the water for use from these concentrations. This process is used, for example, to routinely confirm that water is safe for human consumption or that bathing and recreational waters are safe to use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blood culture</span> Test to detect bloodstream infections

A blood culture is a medical laboratory test used to detect bacteria or fungi in a person's blood. Under normal conditions, the blood does not contain microorganisms: their presence can indicate a bloodstream infection such as bacteremia or fungemia, which in severe cases may result in sepsis. By culturing the blood, microbes can be identified and tested for resistance to antimicrobial drugs, which allows clinicians to provide an effective treatment.

The Miles and Misra Method is a technique used in Microbiology to determine the number of colony forming units in a bacterial suspension or homogenate. The technique was first described in 1938 by Miles, Misra and Irwin who at the time were working at the LSHTM. The Miles and Misra method has been shown to be precise.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Streaking (microbiology)</span> Method for isolation of bacterial strains

In microbiology, streaking is a technique used to isolate a pure strain from a single species of microorganism, often bacteria. Samples can then be taken from the resulting colonies and a microbiological culture can be grown on a new plate so that the organism can be identified, studied, or tested.

Total viable organism is a term used in microbiology to quantify the amount of microorganisms present in a sample. Each sample is usually cultured on a variety of agar plates often containing different types of selective media. The colony-forming units (CFUs) are calculated after allowing time for growth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Petrifilm</span> Plating system developed by 3M

The 3M Petrifilm plate is an all-in-one plating system made by the Food Safety Division of the 3M Company. They are heavily used in many microbiology-related industries and fields to culture various micro-organisms and are meant to be a more efficient method for detection and enumeration compared to conventional plating techniques. A majority of its use is for the testing of foodstuffs.

The minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) is the lowest concentration of an antibacterial agent required to kill a particular bacterium. It can be determined from broth dilution minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) tests by subculturing to agar plates that do not contain the test agent. The MBC is identified by determining the lowest concentration of antibacterial agent that reduces the viability of the initial bacterial inoculum by ≥99.9%. The MBC is complementary to the MIC; whereas the MIC test demonstrates the lowest level of antimicrobial agent that inhibits growth, the MBC demonstrates the lowest level of antimicrobial agent that results in microbial death. This means that even if a particular MIC shows inhibition, plating the bacteria onto agar might still result in organism proliferation because the antimicrobial did not cause death. Antibacterial agents are usually regarded as bactericidal if the MBC is no more than four times the MIC. Because the MBC test uses colony-forming units as a proxy measure of bacterial viability, it can be confounded by antibacterial agents which cause aggregation of bacterial cells. Examples of antibacterial agents which do this include flavonoids and peptides.

Total viable count (TVC), gives a quantitative estimate of the concentration of microorganisms such as bacteria, yeast or mould spores in a sample. The count represents the number of colony forming units (cfu) per g of the sample.

Plate count agar (PCA), also called standard methods agar (SMA), is a microbiological growth medium commonly used to assess or to monitor "total" or viable bacterial growth of a sample. PCA is not a selective medium.

Transformation efficiency refers to the ability of a cell to take up and incorporate exogenous DNA, such as plasmids, during a process called transformation. The efficiency of transformation is typically measured as the number of transformants per microgram of DNA added to the cells. A higher transformation efficiency means that more cells are able to take up the DNA, and a lower efficiency means that fewer cells are able to do so.

Cell counting is any of various methods for the counting or similar quantification of cells in the life sciences, including medical diagnosis and treatment. It is an important subset of cytometry, with applications in research and clinical practice. For example, the complete blood count can help a physician to determine why a patient feels unwell and what to do to help. Cell counts within liquid media are usually expressed as a number of cells per unit of volume, thus expressing a concentration.

Virtual colony count (VCC) is a kinetic, 96-well microbiological assay originally developed to measure the activity of defensins. It has since been applied to other antimicrobial peptides including LL-37. It utilizes a method of enumerating bacteria called quantitative growth kinetics, which compares the time taken for a bacterial batch culture to reach a threshold optical density with that of a series of calibration curves. The name VCC has also been used to describe the application of quantitative growth kinetics to enumerate bacteria in cell culture infection models. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) can be done on 96-well plates by diluting the antimicrobial agent at varying concentrations in broth inoculated with bacteria and measuring the minimum inhibitory concentration that results in no growth. However, these methods cannot be used to study some membrane-active antimicrobial peptides, which are inhibited by the broth itself. The virtual colony count procedure takes advantage of this fact by first exposing bacterial cells to the active antimicrobial agent in a low-salt buffer for two hours, then simultaneously inhibiting antimicrobial activity and inducing exponential growth by adding broth. The growth kinetics of surviving cells can then be monitored using a temperature-controlled plate reader. The time taken for each growth curve to reach a threshold change in optical density is then converted into virtual survival values, which serve as a measure of antimicrobial activity.

Spot analysis, spot test analysis, or spot test is a chemical test, a simple and efficient technique where analytic assays are executed in only one, or a few drops, of a chemical solution, preferably in a great piece of filter paper, without using any sophisticated instrumentation. The development and popularization of the test is credited to Fritz Feigl.

Agar dilution is one of two methods used by researchers to determine the Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of antibiotics. It is the dilution method most frequently used to test the effectiveness of new antibiotics when a few antibiotics are tested against a large panel of different bacteria.

Impedance microbiology is a microbiological technique used to measure the microbial number density of a sample by monitoring the electrical parameters of the growth medium. The ability of microbial metabolism to change the electrical conductivity of the growth medium was discovered by Stewart and further studied by other scientists such as Oker-Blom, Parson and Allison in the first half of 20th century. However, it was only in the late 1970s that, thanks to computer-controlled systems used to monitor impedance, the technique showed its full potential, as discussed in the works of Fistenberg-Eden & Eden, Ur & Brown and Cady.

In microbiology, the term isolation refers to the separation of a strain from a natural, mixed population of living microbes, as present in the environment, for example in water or soil, or from living beings with skin flora, oral flora or gut flora, in order to identify the microbe(s) of interest. Historically, the laboratory techniques of isolation first developed in the field of bacteriology and parasitology, before those in virology during the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Colonial morphology</span> Examination of microbial colonies

In microbiology, colonial morphology refers to the visual appearance of bacterial or fungal colonies on an agar plate. Examining colonial morphology is the first step in the identification of an unknown microbe. The systematic assessment of the colonies' appearance, focusing on aspects like size, shape, colour, opacity, and consistency, provides clues to the identity of the organism, allowing microbiologists to select appropriate tests to provide a definitive identification.

References

  1. Amann, R I; Ludwig, W; Schleifer, K H (1995). "Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation". Microbiological Reviews. 59 (1): 143–169. doi:10.1128/mr.59.1.143-169.1995. ISSN   0146-0749. PMC   239358 . PMID   7535888.
  2. Staley, James T.; Konopka, Allan (1985). "Measurement of In Situ Activities of Nonphotosynthetic Microorganisms in Aquatic and Terrestrial Habitats". Annual Review of Microbiology. 39 (1): 321–346. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.39.100185.001541. ISSN   0066-4227.
  3. Goldman, Emanuel; Green, Lorrence H (24 August 2008). Practical Handbook of Microbiology, Second Edition (Google eBook) (Second ed.). USA: CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group. p. 864. ISBN   978-0-8493-9365-5 . Retrieved 2014-10-16.
  4. Breed RS, Dotterrer WD (May 1916). "The Number of Colonies Allowable on Satisfactory Agar Plates". Journal of Bacteriology. 1 (3): 321–31. doi:10.1128/JB.1.3.321-331.1916. PMC   378655 . PMID   16558698.
  5. Schug, Angela R.; Bartel, Alexander; Meurer, Marita; Scholtzek, Anissa D.; Brombach, Julian; Hensel, Vivian; Fanning, Séamus; Schwarz, Stefan; Feßler, Andrea T. (2020-12-01). "Comparison of two methods for cell count determination in the course of biocide susceptibility testing". Veterinary Microbiology. 251: 108831. doi:10.1016/j.vetmic.2020.108831. PMID   33202368. S2CID   225308316.
  6. Badieyan, Saeedesadat; Dilmaghani-Marand, Arezou; Hajipour, Mohammad Javad; Ameri, Ali; Razzaghi, Mohammad Reza; Rafii-Tabar, Hashem; Mahmoudi, Morteza; Sasanpour, Pezhman (2018-07-17). "Detection and Discrimination of Bacterial Colonies with Mueller Matrix Imaging". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 10815. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29059-5. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   6050273 . PMID   30018335.
  7. Foladori, Paola; Laura, Bruni; Gianni, Andreottola; Giuliano, Ziglio (2007). "Effects of sonication on bacteria viability in wastewater treatment plants evaluated by flow cytometry—Fecal indicators, wastewater and activated sludge". Water Research. 41 (1): 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.021.
  8. "Log10 Colony Forming Units per Gram". Titi Tudorancea Encyclopedia. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  9. Daniel Y. C. Fung (2009). "Viable Cell Counts". Bioscience International. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  10. Martin Cole (November 1, 2005). "Principles of microbiological testing: Statistical basis of sampling" (PDF). International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF). Archived from the original (PDF) on October 31, 2017. Retrieved September 25, 2016.
  11. 1 2 3 "USP 61: Microbial Enumeration Tests" (PDF). United States Pharmacopeia. Retrieved 24 March 2015.[ permanent dead link ]
  12. Whitmire, Jeannette M.; Merrell, D. Scott (2012), Houghton, JeanMarie (ed.), "Successful Culture Techniques for Helicobacter Species: General Culture Techniques for Helicobacter pylori", Helicobacter Species, Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, vol. 921, pp. 17–27, doi:10.1007/978-1-62703-005-2_4, ISBN   978-1-62703-004-5 , retrieved 2023-12-01
  13. Reynolds, Jackie. "Serial Dilution Protocols". www.microbelibrary.org. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. Retrieved 2015-11-15.
  14. Brugger, Silvio D.; Baumberger, Christian; Jost, Marcel; Jenni, Werner; Brugger, Urs; Mühlemann, Kathrin (2012-03-20). Bereswill, Stefan (ed.). "Automated Counting of Bacterial Colony Forming Units on Agar Plates". PLoS ONE. 7 (3): e33695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033695. ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3308999 . PMID   22448267.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  15. Khan, Arif ul Maula; Torelli, Angelo; Wolf, Ivo; Gretz, Norbert (2018-05-08). "AutoCellSeg: robust automatic colony forming unit (CFU)/cell analysis using adaptive image segmentation and easy-to-use post-editing techniques". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 7302. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-24916-9. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   5940850 . PMID   29739959.
  16. Zhang, Louis (2022-11-05). "Machine learning for enumeration of cell colony forming units". Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art. 5 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/s42492-022-00122-3. ISSN   2524-4442. PMC   9637067 . PMID   36334176.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  17. Zhang, Louis (2022-11-05). "Machine learning for enumeration of cell colony forming units". Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art. 5 (1): 26. doi:10.1186/s42492-022-00122-3. ISSN   2524-4442. PMC   9637067 . PMID   36334176.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  18. Geissmann Q (2013). "OpenCFU, a new free and open-source software to count cell colonies and other circular objects". PLOS ONE. 8 (2): e54072. arXiv: 1210.5502 . Bibcode:2013PLoSO...854072G. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054072 . PMC   3574151 . PMID   23457446.
  19. "NIST's Integrated colony enumerator (NICE)". Archived from the original on 2014-06-27. Retrieved 2017-07-13.[ full citation needed ]
  20. Clarke ML, Burton RL, Hill AN, Litorja M, Nahm MH, Hwang J (August 2010). "Low-cost, high-throughput, automated counting of bacterial colonies". Cytometry Part A. 77 (8): 790–7. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20864. PMC   2909336 . PMID   20140968.
  21. Cai Z, Chattopadhyay N, Liu WJ, Chan C, Pignol JP, Reilly RM (November 2011). "Optimized digital counting colonies of clonogenic assays using ImageJ software and customized macros: comparison with manual counting". International Journal of Radiation Biology. 87 (11): 1135–46. doi:10.3109/09553002.2011.622033. PMID   21913819. S2CID   25417288.
  22. Vokes MS, Carpenter AE (April 2008). "Using CellProfiler for automatic identification and measurement of biological objects in images". Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Chapter 14: Unit 14.17. doi:10.1002/0471142727.mb1417s82. ISBN   978-0471142720. PMC   4302752 . PMID   18425761.
  23. "Promega Colony Counter". App Store. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  24. "APD Colony Counter App PRO - Apps on Google Play". play.google.com. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  25. Austerjost, Jonas; Marquard, Daniel; Raddatz, Lukas; Geier, Dominik; Becker, Thomas; Scheper, Thomas; Lindner, Patrick; Beutel, Sascha (August 2017). "A smart device application for the automated determination of E. coli colonies on agar plates". Engineering in Life Sciences. 17 (8): 959–966. doi: 10.1002/elsc.201700056 . ISSN   1618-0240. PMC   6999497 . PMID   32624845.
  26. "CFU Scope". App Store. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  27. Jarvis, Basil (2016), "Errors associated with colony count procedures", Statistical Aspects of the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Elsevier, pp. 119–140, doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-803973-1.00007-3, ISBN   978-0-12-803973-1 , retrieved 2023-12-01
  28. "Colony Counters: Robotic Colony Counter - Plate Handler". www.neutecgroup.com. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  29. "Fully Automatic Colony Counter by AAA Lab Equipment Video | LabTube". www.labtube.tv. Retrieved 2018-09-28.
  30. Clarke, Matthew L.; Burton, Robert L.; Hill, A. Nayo; Litorja, Maritoni; Nahm, Moon H.; Hwang, Jeeseong (2010). "Low‐cost, high‐throughput, automated counting of bacterial colonies". Cytometry Part A. 77A (8): 790–797. doi:10.1002/cyto.a.20864. ISSN   1552-4922. PMC   2909336 . PMID   20140968.
  31. Gilchrist, J. E.; Campbell, J. E.; Donnelly, C. B.; Peeler, J. T.; Delaney, J. M. (1973). "Spiral Plate Method for Bacterial Determination". Applied Microbiology. 25 (2): 244–252. doi:10.1128/am.25.2.244-252.1973. ISSN   0003-6919. PMC   380780 . PMID   4632851.
  32. Brugger, Silvio D.; Baumberger, Christian; Jost, Marcel; Jenni, Werner; Brugger, Urs; Mühlemann, Kathrin (2012-03-20). "Automated Counting of Bacterial Colony Forming Units on Agar Plates". PLOS ONE. 7 (3): e33695. Bibcode:2012PLoSO...733695B. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033695 . ISSN   1932-6203. PMC   3308999 . PMID   22448267.
  33. Dehority, B A; Tirabasso, P A; Grifo, A P (1989). "Most-probable-number procedures for enumerating ruminal bacteria, including the simultaneous estimation of total and cellulolytic numbers in one medium". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 55 (11): 2789–2792. doi:10.1128/aem.55.11.2789-2792.1989. ISSN   0099-2240. PMC   203169 . PMID   2624460.
  34. "Bacterial Analytical Manual: Most Probable Number from Serial Dilutions". United States Food and Drug Administration. October 2010.

Further reading