Columbia Journal of Transnational Law

Last updated

Ranking and Citations

The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law is the highest-ranked and most-cited specialty journal at Columbia Law School. [3] It is listed among the Peace Palace Library's top international law journals. [4]

The journal has been cited by the Supreme Court of the United States, [5] [6] [7] [8] the First Circuit Court of Appeals, [9] the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, [10] [11] [12] the United States Court of International Trade, [13] and numerous other federal appellate and district courts. The journal has also been cited by the Permanent Court of Arbitration and the World Bank's International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, as well as by separate and dissenting opinions of the International Court of Justice and International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19]

Several States, including Canada, Costa Rica, India, Israel, Nigeria, the United States, and South Africa, have also cited to the Journal in their written submissions, memorials, and counter-memorials to the International Court of Justice in respect of several landmark contentious cases and advisory opinions, including the Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons, Wall and the South West Africa Advisory Opinions. [20] [21] [22] [23]

History

The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law was created by Wolfgang G. Friedmann and a group of Columbia law students belonging to the Columbia Society of International Law. [1] The first volume, published in 1961 under the name the Bulletin of the Columbia Society of International Law, consisted of informal discussions of international legal questions. [1] The second volume, published in 1963 under the title International Law Bulletin, adopted the tradition of the scholarly law review. [1]

During its second decade, the journal expanded publication to three issues per year, experimented with themed issues, and published some of the early proceedings of the Friedmann Conference which is held annually at Columbia Law School. [1] By the beginning of its third decade, the journal's themed issues—entire issues dedicated to the examination of current international law problems—became regular publications. [1] These topical issues have examined international taxation, international trade embargoes and boycotts, China's legal development, sovereign debt rescheduling, socialist law and international satellite communications. [1]

Organizational structure and staff

The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law is published by The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law Association, Inc., a New York corporation. The corporation is overseen by a board of directors of 18 members. [24] The journal is further assisted by a board of advisors consisting of 9 members. [25] The 2023-2024 editorial staff for Volume 62 consists of 29 student editors and 41 staff members. [26]

The Bulletin

The Columbia Journal of Transnational Law also publishes the Bulletin, an online publication featuring student notes, legal updates, and interviews with legal scholars and practitioners. [27] [28]

Wolfgang Friedmann Memorial Award

The Wolfgang Friedmann Memorial Award is presented annually to an individual who has made outstanding contributions to the field of transnational law. [29] The award is given in memory of the journal's founder, Wolfgang Friedmann. [29] The recipient of the award is honored at the annual Wolfgang Friedmann Banquet.

Recipients of the Award [30]
YearRecipient
2024 Sarah Cleveland
2023 Navi Pillay
2022 Christiana Figueres
2021 Ruth Bader Ginsburg
2020 Joan E. Donoghue
2019 David Miliband
2018 Anne-Marie Slaughter
2017 Stephen G. Breyer
2016 Martti Ahtisaari
2015 Lori Damrosch
2014 Aryeh Neier
2013 Shirin Ebadi
2012 M. Cherif Bassiouni
2011 George J. Mitchell
2010 Jerome A. Cohen
2009 James Crawford
2008 Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade
2007 Sandra Day O'Connor

Antonio Cassese

2006 Ian Brownlie
2005 Richard N. Gardner
2004 Giulano Amato
2003 Harold Hongju Koh
2002 Hans Blix
2001 Louise Arbour
2000 Gabrielle Kirk McDonald
1999 Thomas Franck
1998 Stephen M. Schwebel
1997 Conrad K. Harper
1996 James A. Baker III
1995 Boutros Boutros-Ghali
1994 Max M. Kampelman
1993 Michael H. Posner
1992 John J. Jackson
1991 Daniel Patrick Moynihan
1990 John N. Hazard
1989 Thomas Buergenthal
1988John R. Stevenson
1987Keith Highet
1986 Louis Henkin
1985 Rosalyn Higgins
1984 Tommy Koh
1983 Oscar Schachter
1982Maxwell Cohen
1981 Telford Taylor
1980 Alona E. Evans
1979 Hardy C. Dillard
1978 Willis M. Reese
1977 Arthur H. Dean
1976Oliver S. Lissitzyn
1975 Philip C. Jessup

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit</span> Federal appellate court for the western U.S.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is the U.S. federal court of appeals that has appellate jurisdiction over the U.S. district courts for the following federal judicial districts:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frank Easterbrook</span> United States federal judge

Frank Hoover Easterbrook is an American lawyer and jurist who has served as a United States circuit judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit since 1985. He was the Seventh Circuit's chief judge from 2006 to 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alien Tort Statute</span> US legislation

The Alien Tort Statute, also called the Alien Tort Claims Act (ATCA), is a section in the United States Code that gives federal courts jurisdiction over lawsuits filed by foreign nationals for torts committed in violation of international law. It was first introduced by the Judiciary Act of 1789 and is one of the oldest federal laws still in effect in the U.S.

Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrath, 341 U.S. 123 (1951), was a United States Supreme Court case that held that groups could sue to challenge their inclusion on the Attorney General's List of Subversive Organizations. The decision was fractured on its reasoning, with each of the Justices in the majority writing separate opinions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edith Jones</span> American judge (born 1949)

Edith Hollan Jones is a United States circuit judge and the former chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

A plurality decision is a court decision in which no opinion received the support of a majority of the judges.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diane S. Sykes</span> American judge (born 1957)

Diane Schwerm Sykes is an American jurist and lawyer who serves as the chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. She served as a justice of the Wisconsin Supreme Court from 1999 to 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">David S. Tatel</span> American judge (born 1942)

David Stephen Tatel is an American lawyer who served as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">José A. Cabranes</span> Puerto Rican judge (born 1940)

José Alberto Cabranes is an American lawyer who serves as a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and a former presiding judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review ("FISCR"). Formerly a practicing lawyer, government official, and law teacher, he was the first Puerto Rican appointed to a federal judgeship in the continental United States (1979).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Reinhardt</span> American judge (1931–2018)

Stephen Roy Reinhardt was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, with chambers in Los Angeles, California. He was the last federal appeals court judge in active service to have been appointed to his position by President Jimmy Carter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bruce M. Selya</span> American judge (born 1934)

Bruce Marshall Selya is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and former chief judge of the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review who is known for his distinctive writing style.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert D. Sack</span> American judge (born 1939)

Robert David Sack is a senior United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerry Edwin Smith</span> American judge

Jerry Edwin Smith is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Circuit split</span> Legal predicament

In United States federal courts, a circuit split, also known as a split of authority or split in authority, occurs when two or more different circuit courts of appeals provide conflicting rulings on the same legal issue. The existence of a circuit split is one of the factors that the Supreme Court of the United States considers when deciding whether to grant review of a case. Some scholars suggest that the Supreme Court is more likely to grant review of a case to resolve a circuit split than for any other reason.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pauline Newman</span> American federal judge (born 1927)

Pauline Newman is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a U.S. circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. She has been called "the heroine of the patent system", "the Federal Circuit's most prolific dissenter", and "the greatest ally to inventors with respect to [calling out] the ignorance of the CAFC, district courts, and at times even the Supreme Court". Chief Judge Kimberly A. Moore commented of Newman that "many of her dissents have later gone on to become the law—either the en banc law from our court or spoken on high from the Supremes".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilfred Feinberg</span> American judge

Wilfred Feinberg was a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and previously was a United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas B. Griffith</span> American judge (born 1954)

Thomas Beall Griffith is an American lawyer and jurist who served as a U.S. circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from 2005 to 2020. Currently, he is a lecturer on law at Harvard Law School, a fellow at the Wheatley Institute at Brigham Young University (BYU), and special counsel in the Washington, D.C. office of the law firm of Hunton Andrews Kurth. He is also a member of the Federalist Society.

Dubitante is used in law reports of a judge who is doubtful about a legal proposition but hesitates to declare it wrong. E.g., "Justice X acquiesces in the Court's opinion and judgment dubitante on the question of Constitutional preemption."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephanos Bibas</span> American judge (born 1969)

Stephanos Bibas is an American lawyer and jurist who serves as a circuit judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Before his appointment to the bench, Bibas was a professor of law and criminology at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, where he also served as director of its Supreme Court clinic.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "About". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Retrieved 2020-05-28.
  2. "International Law Journals". Columbia Law School. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  3. "InCites Journal Citation Reports". Clarivate Analytics. 2018. Archived from the original on 2019-04-15.
  4. "Top 200 International Law Journals". Peace Palace Library. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  5. "Morrison v. Nat'l Australia Bank Ltd., 561 U.S. 247, 260 (2010)". Leagle. Supreme Court of the United States.
  6. "Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, 554 U.S. 471, 496 (2008)" (PDF). Supreme Court of the United States.
  7. "Verlinden B.V. v. Cent. Bank of Nigeria, 461 U.S. 480 (1983)". Justia. Supreme Court of the United States.
  8. "The Dutra Group v. Batterton, 139 S.Ct. 2275, 2287 (2019)." Casetext. Supreme Court of the United States.
  9. "Quaak v. Klynveld Peat Marwick Goerdeler Bedrijfsrevisoren, 361 F.3d 11, 18 (1st Cir. 2004)". Justia. United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
  10. "NML Capital, Ltd. v. Banco Cent. de la Republica Argentina, 652 F.3d 172, 189 (2d Cir. 2011)". United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
  11. "ITT World Commc'ns, Inc. v. F.C.C., 595 F.2d 897, 900 (2d Cir. 1979)". United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. December 1978. p. 897.
  12. "United States v. Amer, 110 F.3d 873, 881 (2d Cir. 1997)". United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. 16 October 1996. p. 873.
  13. "ANDRITZ SUNDWIG GMBH, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES" (PDF). U.S. Customs & Border Protection. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  14. "Venezuela US, S.R.L. (Barbados) v. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Final Award (Quantum)". Cases - Permanent Court of Arbitration. Permanent Court of Arbitration. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  15. "Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assessmant and Control, BIVAC B.V v. Republic of Paraguay" (PDF). Bureau Veritas, Inspection, Valuation, Assesment and Control, BIVAC B.V. v. Republic of Paraguay, ICSID Case No. ARB/07/9, Further Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 9 October 2012. ICSID. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  16. "Separate Opinion of Judge ad hoc Petrig, The M/T "San Padre Pio" Case" (PDF). International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. ITLOS. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  17. "Jadhav (India v. Pakistan), Concurring Opinion, Judge Cançado Trindade" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  18. "Application of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (Georgia v. Russian Federation), Judgment, Dissenting opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  19. "The M/V "SAIGA" Case (Saint Vincent and the Grenadines v. Guinea), Judgment, Dissenting opinion of Judge Anderson" (PDF). International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea.
  20. "Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970), Written Statements of India, the United States, and Nigeria" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  21. "Written Statement of the Government of Israel, Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  22. "Counter-Memorial of Canada, Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada/United States of America)" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  23. "Legality of the Use by a State of Nuclear Weapons in Armed Conflict, Written Submission of Costa Rica" (PDF). International Court of Justice. International Court of Justice. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  24. "Volume 62 Masthead". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  25. "Volume 62 Masthead". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  26. "Volume 62 Masthead". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
  27. "Bulletin Blogposts". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Archived from the original on 2020-12-21.
  28. "Bulletin Notes". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Archived from the original on 2020-12-21.
  29. 1 2 "The Wolfgang Friedmann Memorial Award". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Retrieved 2020-05-29.
  30. "Past Recipients". Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. Retrieved 2020-05-29.