Long title | An Act to create a new offence that, in England and Wales or Northern Ireland, is to be called corporate manslaughter and, in Scotland, is to be called corporate homicide; and to make provision in connection with that offence. |
---|---|
Citation | 2007 c. 19 |
Introduced by | Home Secretary John Reid, 20 July 2006 |
Territorial extent | England and Wales; Scotland; Northern Ireland |
Dates | |
Royal assent | 26 July 2007 |
Commencement | 6 April 2008 |
Repealed | — |
Other legislation | |
Amended by | — |
Repealed by | — |
Relates to | — |
Status: Current legislation | |
History of passage through Parliament | |
Text of statute as originally enacted | |
Revised text of statute as amended |
The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (c. 19) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom that seeks to broaden the law on corporate manslaughter in the United Kingdom. The Act created a new offence respectively named corporate manslaughter in England and Wales and Northern Ireland, and corporate homicide in Scotland.
The Act received the royal assent on 26 July 2007 and came into force on 6 April 2008. [2]
In the United Kingdom, a corporation is considered a juristic person and can be capable of committing, being convicted of and sentenced for, a criminal offence. [3] However, some conceptual difficulty lies in fixing a corporation with the appropriate mens rea . [4] Before the Act, a corporation could only be convicted of manslaughter if a single employee of the company committed all the elements of the offence and was of sufficient seniority to be seen as embodying the "mind" of the corporation. [5] [6] The practical consequence of this was that such convictions were rare and there was public discontent where it was perceived that culpable corporations had escaped censure and punishment. [4]
A Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Bill was introduced to the House of Commons by Home Secretary John Reid on 20 July 2006. [7]
The Act attempts to align the offence of corporate killing north and south of the border. An indictable offence [8] is committed if the way in which an organisation's activities are managed or organised: [9]
— and the way in which its activities are managed or organised by its senior management is a substantial element in the breach. [10] Prosecution in England or Wales requires the permission of the Director of Public Prosecutions, and in Northern Ireland, the Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland [11] and no natural person can be charged with aiding and abetting the offence. [12] In Scotland, all prosecutions are initiated by the Procurator Fiscal. [2] The common law offence of gross negligence manslaughter, as it applies to corporations, is abolished. [13]
The offence applies to: [14]
A relevant duty of care is one of several duties of care owed by the organisation under the law of negligence and is a question of law for the judge. [17] Various government policy decisions; [18] policing, [19] military [20] and child protection [21] activities; and emergency responses [22] are excluded.
There are particular duties of care owed to persons in custody (s. 2(1)(d)) and, owing to the sensitivity and difficulty of such duties, implementation of this section was delayed. The Ministry of Justice published a report on progress towards implementation in July 2008. [23]
A breach of a duty of care by an organisation is a gross breach if the alleged conduct amounts to a breach of that duty that falls far below what can reasonably be expected of the organisation in the circumstances. [24] The jury must consider whether the evidence shows that the organisation failed to comply with any health and safety legislation that relates to the alleged breach, and if so: [25]
The jury may also: [25]
Senior management means the persons who play significant roles in: [26]
On conviction a corporation may be ordered to remedy any breach, [27] or to publicise its failures, [28] or be given an unlimited fine. [8] The Sentencing Guidelines Council issued a steps based definitive guideline, effective from 1 February 2016, for sentencing the offence of corporate manslaughter. The recommendations of the guideline are based on the size and turnover of the organisations with a starting fine of £300,000 and a no limit maximum. [29] If an individual is also found liable for the offence of manslaughter, it can be prosecuted under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 ruled by the same sentencing guideline. [29]
Company name | Conviction date | Victim's name | Cause of death | Fine (plus costs) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Cotswold Geotechnical Holdings [30] | 15 February 2011 | Alex Wright | Geologic trial pit collapse. | £385,000 |
2 | JMW Farm Ltd [31] | 8 May 2012 | Robert Wilson | Large metal bin fell off forklift and onto victim. | £187,500 |
3 | Lion Steel Ltd [32] | 3 July 2012 | Steven Berry | Fall through a factory roof. | £480,000 |
4 | J Murray and Sons [33] | 7 October 2013 | Norman Porter | Pulled into an animal feed mixing machine. | £100,000 |
5 | Princes Sporting Club [34] | 22 November 2013 | Mari-Simon Cronje | Eleven-year-old struck by speedboat. | £135,000 |
6 | Mobile Sweepers (Reading) Ltd [35] | 2 December 2013 | Malcolm Hinton | Crushed attempting to repair a street-sweeping truck. | £8,000 |
7 | Cavendish Masonry Ltd [36] | 22 May 2014 | David Evans | Builder crushed by a two-ton block of limestone. | £150,000 |
8 | Sterecycle (Rotherham) Ltd [37] | 7 November 2014 | Michael Whinfrey | Plant explosion. | £500,000 |
9 | A Diamond and Son (Timber) Ltd [38] | 17 December 2014 | Peter Lennon | Crushed while carrying out machinery maintenance. | £75,000 |
10 | Peter Mawson Ltd [39] | 19 December 2014 | Jason Pennington | Fell through a skylight while working on a roof. | £200,000 |
11 | Pyranha Mouldings Ltd [40] | 12 January 2015 | Alan Catterall | Accidentally locked inside industrial oven. | £200,000 |
12 | Nicole Enterprises [41] | 12 March 2015 | Thomas Houston | Crushed by a static caravan. | Not yet sentenced |
13 | Kings Scaffolding [42] | 28 April 2015 | Adrian Smith | Fell through a skylight. | £300,000 |
14 | Huntley Mount Engineering Ltd [43] | 14 July 2015 | Cameron Minshull | Sixteen-year-old apprentice became entangled on a lathe. | £150,000 |
15 | CAV Aerospace Ltd [44] | 24 July 2015 | Paul Bowers | Crushed by aircraft components. | £600,000 |
16 | Linley Development Ltd [45] | 7 September 2015 | Gareth Jones | Crushed by wall collapse while excavating. | £200,000 [46] |
17 | Cheshire Gates and Automation Ltd [47] | 7 September 2015 | Semelia Campbell | Trapped in a faulty electric gate | £50,000 |
18 | Baldwins Crane Hire Ltd [48] | 22 December 2015 | Lindsay Easton | Crane crashed into an earth bank. | £700,000 |
19 | Sherwood Rise Ltd [49] | February 2016 | Ivy Atkin | Died in a care home. | £300,000 |
20 | Monavon Construction Ltd [50] | June 2016 | Gavin Brewer and Stuart Meads | Fell through roadside hoarding | £500,000 |
21 | Bilston Skips Ltd [51] | August 2016 | Jagpal Singh | Fell from the top of a skip | £600,000 |
22 | SR and JR Brown Ltd [52] | March 2017 | Benjamin Edge | Roof fall | £300,000 |
23 | Koseoglu Metalworks Ltd [53] | May 2017 | Nikolai Valkov | Roof fall | £300,000 |
24 | Odzil Investments Ltd [53] | May 2017 | Nikolai Valkov | Roof fall | £500,000 |
25 | Martinisation London Ltd [54] | May 2017 | Tomasz Procko and Kyrol Szymanski | Lifting operations at height | £1,200,000 |
26 | Master Construction Products (Skips) Ltd | November 2017 | Safi Qais Khan | Crushed by machinery | £255,000 |
27 | Deco-Pak [55] | January 2022 | Andrew Tibbott | Crushed to death by a robotic packing arm |
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) is the principal public agency for conducting criminal prosecutions in England and Wales. It is headed by the Director of Public Prosecutions.
A prosecutor is a legal representative of the prosecution in states with either the common law adversarial system or the civil law inquisitorial system. The prosecution is the legal party responsible for presenting the case in a criminal trial against an individual accused of breaking the law. Typically, the prosecutor represents the state or the government in the case brought against the accused person.
Vehicular homicide is a crime that involves the death of a person other than the driver as a result of either criminally negligent or murderous operation of a motor vehicle.
The Communications Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The act, which came into force on 25 July 2003, superseded the Telecommunications Act 1984. The new act was the responsibility of Culture Secretary Tessa Jowell. It consolidated the telecommunication and broadcasting regulators in the UK, introducing the Office of Communications (Ofcom) as the new industry regulator. On 28 December 2003 Ofcom gained its full regulatory powers, inheriting the duties of the Office of Telecommunications (Oftel). Among other measures, the act introduced legal recognition of community radio and paved the way for full-time community radio services in the UK, as well as controversially lifting many restrictions on cross-media ownership. It also made it illegal to use other people's Wi-Fi broadband connections without their permission. In addition, the legislation also allowed for the first time non-European entities to wholly own a British television company.
Culpable homicide is a categorisation of certain offences in various jurisdictions within the Commonwealth of Nations which involves the illegal killing of a person either with or without an intention to kill depending upon how a particular jurisdiction has defined the offence. Unusually for those legal systems which have originated or been influenced during rule by the United Kingdom, the name of the offence associates with Scots law rather than English law.
Corporate manslaughter is a criminal offence in English law, being an act of homicide committed by a company or organisation. In general, in English criminal law, a juristic person is in the same position as a natural person, and may be convicted for committing many offences. The Court of Appeal confirmed in one of the cases following the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster that a company can, in principle, commit manslaughter, although all defendants in that case were acquitted.
In England and Wales, a magistrates' court is a lower court which hears matters relating to summary offences and some triable either-way matters. Some civil law issues are also decided here, notably family proceedings. In 2015, there were roughly 330 magistrates' courts in England and Wales, though the government was considering closing up to 57 of these. The jurisdiction of magistrates' courts and rules governing them are set out in the Magistrates' Courts Act 1980.
Causing death by dangerous driving is a statutory offence in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. It is an aggravated form of dangerous driving. It is currently created by section 1 of the Road Traffic Act 1988.
A police caution is a formal alternative to prosecution in minor cases, administered by the police in England and Wales. It is commonly used to resolve cases where full prosecution is not seen as the most appropriate solution. Accepting a caution requires an admission of guilt.
Murder is an offence under the common law of England and Wales. It is considered the most serious form of homicide, in which one person kills another with the intention to cause either death or serious injury unlawfully. The element of intentionality was originally termed malice aforethought, although it required neither malice nor premeditation. Baker, chapter 14 states that many killings done with a high degree of subjective recklessness were treated as murder from the 12th century right through until the 1974 decision in DPP v Hyam.
Violent disorder is a statutory offence in England and Wales. It is created by section 2(1) of the Public Order Act 1986. Sections 2(1) to (4) of that Act provide:
In the English law of homicide, manslaughter is a less serious offence than murder, the differential being between levels of fault based on the mens rea or by reason of a partial defence. In England and Wales, a common practice is to prefer a charge of murder, with the judge or defence able to introduce manslaughter as an option. The jury then decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of either murder or manslaughter. On conviction for manslaughter, sentencing is at the judge's discretion, whereas a sentence of life imprisonment is mandatory on conviction for murder. Manslaughter may be either voluntary or involuntary, depending on whether the accused has the required mens rea for murder.
Manslaughter is a common law legal term for homicide considered by law as less culpable than murder. The distinction between murder and manslaughter is sometimes said to have first been made by the ancient Athenian lawmaker Draco in the 7th century BC.
English criminal law concerns offences, their prevention and the consequences, in England and Wales. Criminal conduct is considered to be a wrong against the whole of a community, rather than just the private individuals affected. The state, in addition to certain international organisations, has responsibility for crime prevention, for bringing the culprits to justice, and for dealing with convicted offenders. The police, the criminal courts and prisons are all publicly funded services, though the main focus of criminal law concerns the role of the courts, how they apply criminal statutes and common law, and why some forms of behaviour are considered criminal. The fundamentals of a crime are a guilty act and a guilty mental state. The traditional view is that moral culpability requires that a defendant should have recognised or intended that they were acting wrongly, although in modern regulation a large number of offences relating to road traffic, environmental damage, financial services and corporations, create strict liability that can be proven simply by the guilty act.
Corporate manslaughter is a crime in several jurisdictions, including England and Wales and Hong Kong. It enables a corporation to be punished and censured for culpable conduct that leads to a person's death. This extends beyond any compensation that might be awarded in civil litigation or any criminal prosecution of an individual. The Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 came into effect in the UK on 6 April 2008.
In the United Kingdom there are several crimes that arise from failure to take care of health, safety and welfare at work.
Scots criminal law relies far more heavily on common law than in England and Wales. Scottish criminal law includes offences against the person of murder, culpable homicide, rape and assault, offences against property such as theft and malicious mischief, and public order offences including mobbing and breach of the peace. Scottish criminal law can also be found in the statutes of the UK Parliament with some areas of criminal law, such as misuse of drugs and traffic offences appearing identical on both sides of the Border. Scottish criminal law can also be found in the statute books of the Scottish Parliament such as the Sexual Offences (Scotland) Act 2009 and Prostitution (Scotland) Act 2007 which only apply to Scotland. In fact, the Scots requirement of corroboration in criminal matters changes the practical prosecution of crimes derived from the same enactment. Corroboration is not required in England or in civil cases in Scotland. Scots law is one of the few legal systems that require corroboration.
A lone worker (LW) is an employee who performs an activity that is carried out in isolation from other workers without close or direct supervision. Such staff may be exposed to risk because there is no-one to assist them and so a risk assessment may be required. Lone workers are now often supported by cloud-based automated monitoring systems and specialised monitoring call centres - often referred to as an 'Alarm Receiving Centre' or 'ARC' in the UK, or 'Emergency Dispatch Center' or 'EDC' in the US.
English law contains homicide offences – those acts involving the death of another person. For a crime to be considered homicide, it must take place after the victim's legally recognised birth, and before their legal death. There is also the usually uncontroversial requirement that the victim be under the "Queen's peace". The death must be causally linked to the actions of the defendant. Since the abolition of the year and a day rule, there is no maximum time period between any act being committed and the victim's death, so long as the former caused the latter.
R v Lee is the leading case in England and Wales concerning erroneous professional dispensing of a controlled medicine. The case was considered by foremost judges with a conviction in the Central Criminal Court of England and Wales in front of its President, the Recorder of London, and its partly successful appeal in the binding precedent-level Court of Appeal. The case confirmed that a serious error in giving a vulnerable customer a potent drug that does not match in any way the prescription, where such action is not the primary causation of any death or suffering, can result in a prosecution of the responsible pharmacist, with up to 2 years imprisonment, depending on the circumstances.