Des Moines speech

Last updated

Des Moines speech
"Lindbergh Text", Burlington Daily Hawk Eye Gazette, September 12, 1941, page 3.png
The Burlington Daily Hawk Eye Gazette reporting on the speech, September 12, 1941
DateSeptember 11, 1941 (1941-09-11)
Duration25 minutes
Venue Des Moines Coliseum
Location Des Moines, Iowa, U.S.
Participants Charles Lindbergh

The Des Moines speech, formally titled "Who Are the War Agitators?", was an isolationist and antisemitic speech that American aviator Charles Lindbergh delivered at a 1941 America First Committee rally held in Des Moines, Iowa. In the speech, Lindbergh argued that participation in World War II was not in the United States' interest, and he accused three groups of trying to push the country toward war: British people, who, he said, propagandized the United States; Jewish people, whom Lindbergh accused of exercising outsized influence and of controlling the news media; and the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who, he said, wanted to use a war to consolidate power. Called Lindbergh's "most controversial public speech", [1] his use of antisemitic tropes and his monolithic characterization of American Jews as war-agitating outsiders prompted a nationwide backlash against him and America First that the organization "never recovered from". [2]

Contents

Background

A crowd greeting Charles Lindbergh in England in 1927 Charles Lindbergh arrived at Croydon Field, Surrey, England, May 29, 1927.jpg
A crowd greeting Charles Lindbergh in England in 1927

After completing a nonstop solo flight across the Atlantic Ocean in 1927, American aviator Charles Lindbergh became an internationally famous and admired public figure. [3] He was the first ever Time Person of the Year. [4] An advocate for aviation, Lindbergh was interested in the military airpower of various European nations; he personally considered the United Kingdom deficient and Nazi Germany impressive in that regard. [5] In 1937, Lindbergh praised German aviation as being, in his words, "without parallel", and he thought Germany had a "sense of decency and value [...] far ahead of" those of America. [6] When the Embassy of the United States, Berlin, hosted a dinner with Lindbergh and Hermann Göring (head of the Nazi Luftwaffe and second most powerful man in the Nazi regime after Hitler) in attendance as guests of honor on October 8, 1938, Göring awarded Lindbergh the Service Cross of the Order of the German Eagle with the Star, which Lindbergh accepted. [7]

In the summer of 1940, Lindbergh wrote in his diary that he believed American society was deteriorating, lamenting that Americans, according to him, "lack[ed] understanding of, or interest in, fundamental problems" and that there were, in his view, too many Jewish people in the United States, for "too many create chaos", Lindbergh believed. [8] People in the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, including Roosevelt himself, privately concluded that Lindbergh was sympathetic to Nazism. [9]

A handbill for an America First Committee event America First Rally flyer April 4 1941.jpg
A handbill for an America First Committee event

Between 1939 and 1941, there was public disagreement in the United States about whether or not the country should enter the then ongoing Second World War. [10] Lindbergh strongly opposed American intervention in the war. [11] He believed the United States would lose in a European war with Germany, [12] and in June 1940 he prognosticated a German victory over the United Kingdom. [13] In 1941, Lindbergh became a member of the national committee for the America First Committee, an isolationist advocacy group that lobbied against American participation in World War II [14] and over the course of its existence increasingly adopted nativism and antisemitism. [15]

Lindbergh gave speeches at thirteen rallies held by America First. [16] Lindbergh's speeches were broadcast over radio and excited audiences, who wrote to him with praises—such as for his rhetorical appeal to reason and calming voice—and according to historian David Goodman, he was "the most popular and charismatic orator" in the public debate about intervention. [17] Beginning in 1941, Lindbergh made several public criticisms of president Franklin D. Roosevelt and his administration, accusing Roosevelt of ignoring the will of the American people, deceiving the public, and "advocat[ing] world domination". [18]

Development

By September 1941, Lindbergh thought the United States was on the brink of entering World War II, and he decided he wanted to give a speech identifying those who he believed were "responsible for pushing" the country to join the war. [19] In previous speeches, Lindbergh had referred vaguely to what he called "powerful elements" in favor of interventionism without specifically naming or identifying them. [20] Preparing for a scheduled address at an America First rally to be held in Des Moines, Iowa, Lindbergh wrote several drafts of a speech he initially titled "Who Are the Interventionists?" before retitling it "Who Are the War Agitators?". [21] Anne Morrow Lindbergh, married to Charles Lindbergh, encouraged him to put more emotion into his public speaking in general, but he dissembled from practicing, disliking rehearsal because he thought, in his words, that he "seem[ed] to lose spirit and feeling in the second reading". [22]

When Anne Lindbergh read Charles Lindbergh's "Who Are the War Agitators?", she was alarmed and warned him against delivering the speech as written, as she predicted the press would consider the speech and him antisemitic. [23] Lindbergh insisted that he intended no antisemitism and refused to revise the speech to alleviate Anne Lindbergh's concern, getting into what she called a "terrible row" with her. [24] In a conversation with poet Selden Rodman a few weeks before giving the speech, Charles Lindbergh said he believed Jewish people had "themselves to blame". [25]

Speech

Des Moines Coliseum, c. 1911 Des Moines Coliseum, ca 1911.png
Des Moines Coliseum, c.1911

Lindbergh delivered "Who Are the War Agitators?" at an America First rally held in the Des Moines Coliseum in Des Moines, Iowa, [26] on September 11, 1941. [27] Eight thousand people were in attendance in person, [26] and it was radio broadcast to a national audience. [28] When Lindbergh got on stage with others from the America First Committee, members of the crowd variously applauded and booed. [29] After a few other speakers preceded him, Lindbergh spoke, and his remarks lasted 25 minutes. He began by saying that there was an "ever-increasing effort to force the United States into" World War II and that he would identify groups who he thought were "responsible for changing our national policy" to favor participation in the war. [30]

Six minutes into the speech, Lindbergh named those he considered war agitators: [26] "the British, the Jewish, and the Roosevelt Administration", adding that he considered "capitalists, anglophiles, and intellectuals" and "[c]ommunistic groups" to also be agitators but of "lesser importance". [30] In the address, Lindbergh said Britain was propagandizing the United States to "get us into the war" because, he averred, it was impossible for Britain to win without American assistance; while it was "perfectly understandable that Great Britain wants the United States in the war on her side", according to Lindbergh "our interest is first in America". [31]

Charles Lindbergh in 1939 Lindbergh arrives at White House. Washington, D.C., April 20. Col. Charles A. Lindbergh, who was called to active duty at the War Department yesterday is pictured as he arrived at the White LCCN2016875479.jpg
Charles Lindbergh in 1939

Lindbergh's accusations of Jewish war agitation comprised three paragraphs in the speech and formed what biographer A. Scott Berg called the "core of [Lindbergh's] thesis". [32] The speech used conspiratorial antisemitic tropes about Jewish influence permeating the United States. [33] Lindbergh said that American Jews had "large ownership and influence in our motion pictures, our press, our radio and our government". [34] Accusations like those in Lindbergh's speech were recognizable in the United States at the time as antisemitic stereotypes codified by the hoax document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion . [35] In reality, only a minority of interventionist organizations' members were Jews, less than 3% of publishers of newspapers in the United States were Jewish, and there were few Jews in the foreign policy bureaucracy. [36] Many Jewish Americans, even if they hoped the United States went to war against Germany, deliberately avoided activism for war intervention out of fear of antisemitic backlash. [37]

Lindbergh said he could "understand why Jewish people would desire the overthrow of Nazi Germany" and that "[n]o person with a sense of the dignity of mankind can condone" the persecution of Jews in Germany, but he insisted that entering World War II would endanger the country. [26] In saying that "the British and the Jewish races", in his words, "for reasons which are not American, wish to involve us in the war", Lindbergh's antisemitic address characterized Jews as foreigners, outsiders, and infiltrators who were different from and dangerous to Americans. [38]

Lindbergh accused the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt of wanting America to go to war as a bid for further power, [39] consolidating control by artificial "maintenance of a wartime emergency". [40] The United States Congress, Lindbergh said, was the "last stronghold of democracy and representative government in this country". [41] According to Lindbergh's speech, only by their combined effort had British people, Jewish people, and the Roosevelt administration brought the United States so close to war, and "[i]f any one of these groups" did not "agitat[e] for war", then he was sure the country would not enter World War II. [42]

Reception

The Evening Star (September 16, 1941) reporting on criticism of the Des Moines speech "Isolationists Challenged To Condemn Anti-Judaism", Evening Star, September 16, 1941, B-4.png
The Evening Star (September 16, 1941) reporting on criticism of the Des Moines speech

Reaction

Historian David Goodman called the Des Moines speech Lindbergh's "most controversial public speech". [1] During the rally, Lindbergh received both booing and applause from the audience, and historian Susan Dunn wrote that when Lindbergh accused Jewish people of controlling the news media and government, "booing drowned out the cheers, forcing him again and again to stop" and "wait out the catcalls". [11] According to historian Lynne Olson, "applause clearly outweighed the jeering". [41]

The general public overall received the speech poorly. [43] Newspapers and politicians throughout the United States blasted Lindbergh's address as un-American. [40] Jewish, Protestant, and Catholic organizations and clergy denounced the speech for its bigotry; theologian Reinhold Niebuhr urged America First to "clean its ranks of those who would incite to racial and religious strife", [44] and the American Jewish Year Book wrote that Lindbergh had platformed an "ugly, hate-breeding lie". [45] On September 16, 1941, the Davenport Times of Iowa reported that no other "public utterance by a figure of prominence in American life in a generation [...] brought forth such unanimous protest from the press, the church and political leaders". [46]

Interventionists, noninterventionists, Democrats, Republicans, and Communists alike criticized Lindbergh, saying that the speech suggested he was antisemitic and sympathized with Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany. [47] Another isolationist organization, the Keep America Out of War Congress, had been collaborating with the America First Committee but ended that partnership after Lindbergh's Des Moines speech. [48] Public intellectual Arthur M. Schlesinger Jr. heard Lindbergh's speech over the radio and in his memoir remembered finding it "all rather scary". [49]

The America First Committee received mail both praising and condemning Lindbergh for his speech. [50] 85% of the mail that America First received in the wake of the speech expressed solidarity with Lindbergh. [51] A portion of those pro-Lindbergh letters also expressed virulent bigotry against Jews, and the speech emboldened some antisemitic Americans. [52] Charles Coughlin, Merwin K. Hart, Herbert Hoover, and Alf Landon spoke in defense of Lindbergh, though their support, according to biographer Berg, "harmed more than they helped". [53] On September 24, 1941, the America First Committee issued an official statement denying charges of antisemitism and accusing interventionists of "inject[ing] the race issue into the discussion". [54] Numerous members and leaders of America First resigned in the aftermath of Lindbergh's speech, [55] and Dunn concluded that the organization "never recovered from the calamity of Lindbergh's stop in Des Moines". [2]

Depiction

Schlesinger's memoir, which mentioned that in 1940, some Republicans had wanted Lindbergh to run for president against Roosevelt, partly inspired novelist Philip Roth's 2004 The Plot Against America , an alternate history novel in which Lindbergh runs in and wins the 1940 United States presidential election. [56] As president, the character Lindbergh institutes antisemitic policies relocating American Jews, and his real-life Des Moines speech is reprinted in a postscript. [57] In the novel's plot, Roth moves the date of the Des Moines speech from 1941 to early 1940 (and thus before the 1940 Republican National Convention). [58] When narrating the speech, Roth describes Lindbergh's voice as "high-pitched, flat, midwestern, decidedly un-Rooseveltian". [59]

Many book reviews of The Plot Against America interpreted its alternate history of the 1940s as a veiled metaphor for the presidency of George W. Bush, whom reviewers said had, like Roth's president Lindbergh, cast a pall of fear over the country, though Lindbergh's isolationism differed from George W. Bush's overseas adventurism. [60] Jewish studies professor Allan Arkush criticized The Plot Against America, as well as its HBO-produced miniseries adaptation of the same name, for implying that "an openly antisemitic candidate could have won the presidency in 1940", doubting the premise (though complimenting the execution) on the basis that in reality the Des Moines speech faced severe public backlash. [58]

Notes

  1. 1 2 Goodman (2008 , p. 351).
  2. 1 2 Dunn (2013 , p. 303).
  3. Cole (1974 , pp. 17–22); Dunn (2013 , p. 46).
  4. Hart (2018 , p. 1).
  5. Cole (1974 , pp. 22, 27, 31–34); Dunn (2013 , p. 50).
  6. Dunn (2013 , p. 50).
  7. Cole (1974 , pp. 41–42); Berg (1998 , pp. 377–378).
  8. Dunn (2013 , pp. 54–55).
  9. Dunn (2013 , p. 56).
  10. Goodman (2017 , p. 56).
  11. 1 2 Dunn (2013 , p. 301).
  12. Cole (1951 , p. 310n21).
  13. Dunn (2013 , p. 55).
  14. Cole (1974 , pp. xi, 121).
  15. Specter & Venkatasubramanian (2023 , pp. 117–118).
  16. Cole (1974 , p. 123)
  17. Goodman (2017 , pp. 56–58, 63–64).
  18. Cole (1974 , pp. 186–191).
  19. Cole (1974 , p. 159).
  20. Hart (2018 , p. 2).
  21. Cole (1974 , p. 160); Berg (1998 , p. 425).
  22. Goodman (2017 , p. 66).
  23. Berg (1998 , p. 425); Olson (2013 , p. 375).
  24. Olson (2013 , p. 379).
  25. Dunn (2013 , p. 302).
  26. 1 2 3 4 Berg (1998 , p. 426).
  27. Goodman (2017 , p. 61).
  28. Olson (2013 , p. 386).
  29. Cole (1974 , p. 161); Dunn (2013 , p. 301).
  30. 1 2 Cole (1974 , p. 161).
  31. Cole (1974 , p. 161); Dunn (2013 , p. 302).
  32. Berg (1998 , pp. 425–426).
  33. Valbousquet (2021 , p. 77).
  34. Greenwald (1942 , p. 152); Hart (2018 , p. 2).
  35. Goodman (2008 , p. 352).
  36. Berg (1998 , p. 429); Olson (2013 , p. 385).
  37. Olson (2013 , p. 385).
  38. Dunn (2013 , p. 301); Specter & Venkatasubramanian (2023 , pp. 117, 121).
  39. Berg (1998 , p. 425).
  40. 1 2 Dunn (2013 , p. 302).
  41. 1 2 Olson (2013 , p. 386).
  42. Cole (1974 , p. 162).
  43. Frankel (2013 , p. 250).
  44. Berg (1998 , p. 428).
  45. Greenwald (1942 , p. 151).
  46. Greenwald (1942 , p. 161).
  47. Cole (1974 , p. 173).
  48. Specter & Venkatasubramanian (2023 , pp. 116–117).
  49. Kalisch (2022 , p. 96n71).
  50. Cole (1974 , p. 176).
  51. Berg (1998 , p. 429); Hart (2018 , pp. 3–4).
  52. Cole (1974 , pp. 176, 185).
  53. Berg (1998 , p. 429).
  54. Cole (1951 , pp. 320, 320n78).
  55. Specter & Venkatasubramanian (2023 , p. 121).
  56. Kalisch (2022 , p. 85).
  57. Kellman (2008 , p. 115).
  58. 1 2 Arkush (2020)
  59. Kalisch (2022 , p. 84).
  60. Kellman (2008 , pp. 114–123).

Bibliography

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1940 United States presidential election</span>

The 1940 United States presidential election was the 39th quadrennial presidential election. It was held on Tuesday, November 5, 1940. Incumbent Democratic President Franklin D. Roosevelt defeated Republican businessman Wendell Willkie to be reelected for an unprecedented third term in office. Until 1988, this was the last time in which the incumbent's party won three consecutive presidential elections. It was also the fourth presidential election in which both major party candidates were registered in the same home state; the others have been in 1860, 1904, 1920, 1944, and 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Lindbergh</span> American aviator and activist (1902–1974)

Charles Augustus Lindbergh was an American aviator, author, and military officer. On May 20–21, 1927, he made the first nonstop flight from New York City to Paris, a distance of 3,600 miles (5,800 km), flying alone for 33.5 hours in the first solo transatlantic flight. His aircraft, the Spirit of St. Louis, was designed to compete for the $25,000 Orteig Prize for the first flight between the two cities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Charles Coughlin</span> American Catholic priest (1891–1979)

Charles Edward Coughlin, commonly known as Father Coughlin, was a Canadian-American Catholic priest based in the United States near Detroit. He was the founding priest of the National Shrine of the Little Flower. Dubbed "The Radio Priest " and considered a leading demagogue, he was one of the first political leaders to use radio to reach a mass audience. During the 1930s, when the U.S. population was about 120 million, an estimated 30 million listeners tuned in to his weekly broadcasts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anne Morrow Lindbergh</span> American aviatrix and author (1906–2001)

Anne Spencer Morrow Lindbergh was an American writer and aviatrix. She was the wife of decorated pioneer aviator Charles Lindbergh, with whom she made many exploratory flights.

A number of organizations and academics consider the Nation of Islam (NOI) to be antisemitic. The NOI has engaged in Holocaust denial, and exaggerates the role of Jews in the African slave trade; mainstream historians, such as Saul S. Friedman, have said Jews had a negligible role. The NOI has repeatedly rejected charges made against it as false and politically motivated.

The America First Committee (AFC) was an American isolationist pressure group against the United States' entry into World War II. Launched in September 1940, it surpassed 800,000 members in 450 chapters at its peak. The AFC principally supported isolationism for its own sake, and its varied coalition included Republicans, Democrats, farmers, industrialists, communists, anti-communists, students, and journalists – however, it was controversial for the anti-Semitic and pro-fascist views of some of its most prominent speakers, leaders, and members. The AFC was dissolved on December 11, 1941, four days after the attack on Pearl Harbor brought the United States into the war.

The history of antisemitism, defined as hostile actions or discrimination against Jews as a religious or ethnic group, goes back many centuries, being called "the longest hatred". Jerome Chanes identifies six stages in the historical development of antisemitism:

  1. Pre-Christian anti-Judaism in Ancient Greece and Rome that was primarily ethnic in nature
  2. Christian antisemitism in antiquity and the Middle Ages that was religious in nature and has extended into modern times
  3. Muslim antisemitism that was—at least in its classical form—nuanced, in that Jews were a protected class
  4. Political, social, and economic antisemitism during the Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment Europe that laid the groundwork for racial antisemitism
  5. Racial antisemitism that arose in the 19th century and culminated in Nazism
  6. Contemporary antisemitism, which has been labeled by some as the new antisemitism
<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Rosenman</span> American politician

Samuel Irving Rosenman was an American lawyer, judge, Democratic Party activist, and presidential speechwriter. He coined the term "New Deal", and helped articulate liberal policies during the heyday of the New Deal coalition. He was the first person to hold the position of White House Counsel.

<i>The Plot Against America</i> 2004 novel by Philip Roth

The Plot Against America is a novel by Philip Roth published in 2004. It is an alternative history in which Franklin D. Roosevelt is defeated in the presidential election of 1940 by Charles Lindbergh. The novel follows the fortunes of the Roth family during the Lindbergh presidency, as antisemitism becomes more acceptable in American life and Jewish-American families like the Roths are persecuted on various levels. The narrator and central character in the novel is the young Philip, and the novel follows his coming of age, as well as American politics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrew Lawrence Somers</span> American politician

Andrew Lawrence Somers was an American businessman, World War I veteran, and Democratic politician who served 13 terms as a U.S. Representative from New York from 1925 until his death in 1949.

The Jewish question was a wide-ranging debate in 19th- and 20th-century Europe that pertained to the appropriate status and treatment of Jews. The debate, which was similar to other "national questions", dealt with the civil, legal, national, and political status of Jews as a minority within society, particularly in Europe during the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries.

In the decades since the Holocaust, some national governments, international bodies and world leaders have been criticized for their failure to take appropriate action to save the millions of European Jews, Roma, and other victims of the Holocaust. Critics say that such intervention, particularly by the Allied governments, might have saved substantial numbers of people and could have been accomplished without the diversion of significant resources from the war effort.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of antisemitism in the United States</span>

Historians continue to study and debate the extent of antisemitism in American history and how American antisemitism has similarities and distinctions with its European counterpart.

Pogroms in the Russian Empire were large-scale, targeted, and repeated anti-Jewish rioting that began in the 19th century. Pogroms began to occur after Imperial Russia, which previously had very few Jews, acquired territories with large Jewish populations from the Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth and the Ottoman Empire from 1772 to 1815. These territories were designated "the Pale of Settlement" by the Imperial Russian government, within which Jews were reluctantly permitted to live. The Pale of Settlement primarily included the territories of Poland, Ukraine, Belarus, Bessarabia, Lithuania and Crimea. Jews were forbidden from moving to other parts of European Russia, unless they converted from Judaism or obtained a university diploma or first guild merchant status. Migration to the Caucasus, Siberia, the Far East or Central Asia was not restricted.

The following events occurred in August 1941:

The following events occurred in September 1941:

Ernest G. Liebold was the business representative and personal secretary of Henry Ford. A fervent antisemite, he took an active part in the antisemitic campaign conducted by the industrialist's weekly newspaper, The Dearborn Independent, from 1920 to 1927. He was also put under investigation by the United States Department of War for being a suspected German spy during the First World War.

Judaeo-Christian ethics is a supposed value system common to Jews and Christians. It was first described in print in 1941 by English writer George Orwell. The idea that Judaeo-Christian ethics underpin American politics, law and morals has been part of the "American civil religion" since the 1940s. In recent years, the phrase has been associated with American conservatism, but the concept—though not always the exact phrase—has frequently featured in the rhetoric of leaders across the political spectrum, including that of Franklin D. Roosevelt and Lyndon B. Johnson.

The foreign policy of the United States was controlled personally by Franklin D. Roosevelt during his first and second and third and fourth terms as the president of the United States from 1933 to 1945. He depended heavily on Henry Morgenthau Jr., Sumner Welles, and Harry Hopkins. Meanwhile, Secretary of State Cordell Hull handled routine matters. Roosevelt was an internationalist, while powerful members of Congress favored more isolationist solutions in order to keep the U.S. out of European wars. There was considerable tension before the Attack on Pearl Harbor in December 1941. The attack converted the isolationists or made them irrelevant. The US began aid to the Soviet Union after Germany invaded it in June 1941. After the US declared war in December 1941, key decisions were made at the highest level by Roosevelt, Britain's Winston Churchill and the Soviet Union's Joseph Stalin, along with their top aides. After 1938 Washington's policy was to help China in its war against Japan, including cutting off money and oil to Japan. While isolationism was powerful regarding Europe, American public and elite opinion strongly opposed Japan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hitler's prophecy</span> Adolf Hitlers speech on 30 January 1939

During a speech at the Reichstag on 30 January 1939, German Führer Adolf Hitler threatened "the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe" in the event of war:

If international finance Jewry inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, the result will be not the Bolshevization of the earth and thereby the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.