Drosophila montana

Last updated

Drosophila montana
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Diptera
Family: Drosophilidae
Subfamily: Drosophilinae
Genus: Drosophila
Subgenus: Drosophila
Species group: virilis
Species:
D. montana
Binomial name
Drosophila montana
Stone, Griffen and Patter, 1942

Drosophila montana, colloquially referred to as a fruit fly, [1] is a species of fly belonging to the family Drosophilidae and the genus Drosophila. [1] [2] It belongs to the montana phylad, which diverged from the D. virilis species group in South Asia before its migration into North America. [3] It is typically found in the western United States, but has been seen in Europe and Asia. [4] [3] There are two color phases of the species, having either a yellowish or a blackish brown thorax. [4] [5] It is the species of Drosophila best adapted to cold environments. [3]

Contents

Description

D. montana were first described by Patterson and Wheeler in 1942. [4] D. montana populations do not display homogeneous coloration. They have two forms of color, either light and dark. These possess a yellowish form or a blackish brown form, respectively. The light form has similar coloration to the species D. novamericana. [4] The primary physical characteristic of the dark form is a blackish brown thorax. The dark form of D. montana also possesses a slightly brownish black stripe along its back, spanning the length of its acrostichal region. They also have legs with brown coloration, and the joints at the tips of their extremities are black. [5]

Notable physical similarities exist between D. montana and D. flavomontana. [4] Early studies mistakenly collected D. flavomontana when searching for D. montana, and species identification was only possible by observing fertility. [4] While black puparia are typically attributed to D. montana and red puparia to D. flavomontana, genetic analysis has shown D. montana may produce red puparia. [4] The two species sometimes produce hybrids, suggesting their coexistence. [4]

Distribution and habitat

Populations of D. montana have been historically found throughout North America, Europe, and Asia⁠—most notably in Vancouver, Canada, Finland, and throughout the United States. [3] [6] [7] Within the US, they are primarily located at high elevations along the Rocky Mountains from northern Idaho to Arizona. They have also been found in the Sierra Nevada mountain range and at lower altitudes within the Cascade Range and Coastal Range. [4]

Drosophila montana typically reside near bodies of water within boreal forest regions, primarily in latitudes above 40 degrees North. Populations of D. montana further south will favor environments of higher elevation. [7] Among all species in the Drosophila genus, D. montana is the most cold-tolerant species, with necessary qualities to survive the conditions of high altitude environments. [3] Their exceptional capacity among the genus Drosophila for tolerating the cold enables the species to survive in high altitude and high latitude environments, which is reflected in their residences of choice. [3]

Phylogeny

The species belongs to the order of flies Diptera and the genus Drosophila. [1] [2] The genus Drosophila includes the virilis group, which diverged in the Early Miocene period, between 7 and 11 million years ago. [3] This event divided the D.virilis species group into two clusters: the virilis and montana phylads. The latter encompasses several lineages including D. montana. This divergence occurred in South Asia, prior to their dispersion into North America. [3] The populations of D. montana in North America, Asia, and Europe diverged between 450,000 and 900,000 years ago. [3]

Cold adaptation

The species D. montana has several distinctive adaptations contributing to their high tolerance of cold. These include a generally elevated resistance and an acclimation response to cold, which can be induced, as well as a photoperiodic female reproductive diapause. [3] [6]

Mating

Adult D. montana congregate in breeding areas, with multiple males pursuing a single female simultaneously. [8] These breeding sites are generally on decomposing tree phloem and areas of sap flux. [9] Mating occurs during the spring and summer months, with active reproduction prevalent up through July. [3] [10] By late August, most adults are in diapause and reproduction ceases. [10] Like many species of Drosophila in temperate regions, there may be only one generation produced per year. [11] This is likely facilitated by the ability to diapause.

Sexual conflict

Sexual conflict regarding the length of copulation is common for D. montana. [12] Females prefer much shorter mating durations, and engage in physical struggles to attempt to throw off a male partner. [12] However, males are often able to maintain sexual contact much longer than females dictate. This allows males to induce females' resistance to copulations, thus preventing the occurrence of females remating. [12] This activity functions as a means of mate guarding. [12]

Courtship songs

Similar to many species of Drosophila, D. montana emit "songs" from wing vibrations. [13] These songs are performed while courting females and are a requirement to initiate mating. [13] [8] Females will convey attraction to males by spreading their wings, to which the male will respond by initiating copulation. [8] Males' songs are subject to significant sexual selection in the species. [13] Songs with fast qualities, such as high carrier frequency, are associated with males with high reproductive success. [13] Overlapping frequencies with environmental background noise can interfere with females' ability to detect the songs, which may compromise mate selection. [8]

With respect to the frequency of males' courtship songs, average inbreeding depression is approximately 14%. [14] This differs significantly from other courtship song characteristics, which differ only by several percent due to inbreeding depression. [14] This suggests that the fitness of male D. montana is associated with the frequency of their courtship songs. [14] The frequency of males' songs is also subject to considerable outbreeding depression. [14]

Cuticular hydrocarbons

D. montana produce cuticular hydrocarbons, commonly abbreviated CHCs, which act as olfactory or gustatory cues for attraction. [13] While more effective in other species of Drosophila, CHCs are a significant factor in mate selection. [13] In particular, female D. montana CHC characteristics are correlated with rates of female rejection of songs. [13] This suggests that females' CHCs act as pheromones, attracting more males and therefore necessitating more rejections. [13]

Reproductive diapause

The typical longevity of adult D. montana in the laboratory is about 30 to 40 days, with females slightly outliving males. [15] Adult female D. montana use photoperiod to determine seasonal changes and inform their reproductive diapause for overwintering. This allows them to reduce their aging, increase their chances of survival over the winter, and increase their longevity. [6]

D. montana develop from egg to adult in about 26 to 30 days, depending on population and photoperiodic conditions. Individuals in the diapause state have arrested development and reproduction. They also become reliant on energy reserves in favor of feeding, so larger individuals typically fare better during diapause. D. montana develop quickly under shorter photoperiods, representative of autumn daylight conditions, to facilitate diapause. This development time is influenced by post-eclosion photoperiodic cues. [6]

Parental care

The desired locations of oviposition for D. montana coincide with their breeding sites. [9] Observed substrates for oviposition include phloem and sap flux yeast growths on birch trees, as well as decomposing stalks of the plant Nuphar lutea , the yellow water lily. [9] The virilis group of Drosophila, to which D. montana belongs, is generally known to oviposit in sap. [3] [9] [10] The species has overlapping preferences for oviposition with D. littoralis. However, D. montana mate slightly earlier, and their larvae are more prevalent in drier substrates. [9]

Commensalism

Beaver-chewed aspen, a popular site for oviposition Beaver-chewed aspen on McGee Pass Trail (3927604891).jpg
Beaver-chewed aspen, a popular site for oviposition

The collection of virilis group flies, including D. montana, is significantly more successful when close to known beaver residences. Beavers preferentially reside in bodies of water close to specific tree species including birch and alder, which they feed on in the winter. The beavers' feeding activity produce fallen trees and stripped bark that supply D. montana, as well as other members of the virilis group, with their preferred sites of oviposition. Alder trees are specifically cited as a favored site of D. montana oviposition. These shared resources support commensalism between the two species. For D. montana, this relationship is typically observed in North America, specifically with the beaver species Castor canadensis . [16]

Related Research Articles

<i>Drosophila</i> Genus of flies

Drosophila is a genus of flies, belonging to the family Drosophilidae, whose members are often called "small fruit flies" or pomace flies, vinegar flies, or wine flies, a reference to the characteristic of many species to linger around overripe or rotting fruit. They should not be confused with the Tephritidae, a related family, which are also called fruit flies ; tephritids feed primarily on unripe or ripe fruit, with many species being regarded as destructive agricultural pests, especially the Mediterranean fruit fly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sperm competition</span> Reproductive process

Sperm competition is the competitive process between spermatozoa of two or more different males to fertilize the same egg during sexual reproduction. Competition can occur when females have multiple potential mating partners. Greater choice and variety of mates increases a female's chance to produce more viable offspring. However, multiple mates for a female means each individual male has decreased chances of producing offspring. Sperm competition is an evolutionary pressure on males, and has led to the development of adaptations to increase male's chance of reproductive success. Sperm competition results in a sexual conflict between males and females. Males have evolved several defensive tactics including: mate-guarding, mating plugs, and releasing toxic seminal substances to reduce female re-mating tendencies to cope with sperm competition. Offensive tactics of sperm competition involve direct interference by one male on the reproductive success of another male, for instance by physically removing another male's sperm prior to mating with a female. For an example, see Gryllus bimaculatus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diapause</span> Response delay in amimal dormancy

In animal dormancy, diapause is the delay in development in response to regular and recurring periods of adverse environmental conditions. It is a physiological state with very specific initiating and inhibiting conditions. The mechanism is a means of surviving predictable, unfavorable environmental conditions, such as temperature extremes, drought, or reduced food availability. Diapause is observed in all the life stages of arthropods, especially insects.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual conflict</span> Term in evolutionary biology

Sexual conflict or sexual antagonism occurs when the two sexes have conflicting optimal fitness strategies concerning reproduction, particularly over the mode and frequency of mating, potentially leading to an evolutionary arms race between males and females. In one example, males may benefit from multiple matings, while multiple matings may harm or endanger females, due to the anatomical differences of that species. Sexual conflict underlies the evolutionary distinction between male and female.

<i>Teleogryllus oceanicus</i> Species of cricket

Teleogryllus oceanicus, commonly known as the Australian, Pacific or oceanic field cricket, is a cricket found across Oceania and in coastal Australia from Carnarvon in Western Australia and Rockhampton in north-east Queensland

<i>Chorthippus brunneus</i> Species of grasshopper

Chorthippus brunneus, also known as the common field grasshopper, is a species of grasshopper of the subfamily Gomphocerinae. The species is common and widespread in the Western Palearctic, and the IUCN lists it as Least Concern.

<i>Drosophila pseudoobscura</i> Species of fly

Drosophila pseudoobscura is a species of fruit fly, used extensively in lab studies of speciation. It is native to western North America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Variable checkerspot</span> Species of butterfly

The variable checkerspot or Chalcedon checkerspot is a butterfly in the family Nymphalidae. It is found in western North America, where its range stretches from Alaska in the north to Baja California in the south and extends east through the Rocky Mountains into Colorado, Montana, New Mexico and Wyoming. The butterfly is usually brown or black with extensive white and yellow checkering and some red coloration on the dorsal wing. Adult wingspan is 3.2–5.7 cm (1.3–2.2 in). Adult butterflies feed on nectar from flowers while larvae feed on a variety of plants including snowberry (Symphoricarpos), paintbrush (Castilleja), Buddleja, Diplacus aurantiacus and Scrophularia californica.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edith's checkerspot</span> Species of butterfly

Edith's checkerspot is a species of butterfly in the family Nymphalidae. It is a resident species of western North America and among the subspecies, entomologists have long been intrigued by their many phenotypic variations in coloration, wing length, and overall body size. Most populations are monophagous and rely on plants including Plantago erecta and Orthocarpus densiflorus as their host species in developing from eggs through to larvae, pupae, and mature butterflies. Males exhibit polygyny whereas females rarely mate more than once. Males devote most of their attention to mate acquisition, and such mate locating strategies such as hilltopping behavior have developed. Climate change and habitat destruction have impacted certain subspecies. Three subspecies in particular, Euphydryas editha quino, Euphydryas editha bayensis and Euphydryas editha taylori, are currently under protection via the Endangered Species Act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Female sperm storage</span>

Female sperm storage is a biological process and often a type of sexual selection in which sperm cells transferred to a female during mating are temporarily retained within a specific part of the reproductive tract before the oocyte, or egg, is fertilized. This process takes place in some species of animals, but not in humans. The site of storage is variable among different animal taxa and ranges from structures that appear to function solely for sperm retention, such as insect spermatheca and bird sperm storage tubules, to more general regions of the reproductive tract enriched with receptors to which sperm associate before fertilization, such as the caudal portion of the cow oviduct containing sperm-associating annexins. Female sperm storage is an integral stage in the reproductive process for many animals with internal fertilization. It has several documented biological functions including:

Ostrinia scapulalis, the adzuki bean borer or adzuki bean worm, is a species of moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Francis Walker in 1859. It is one of 20 moths in the genus Ostrinia and is of Eurasian origin. The larvae have a gray mid-dorsal line and can be light pink or beige. The adult adzuki bean borer has a yellowish-brown forewing with jagged lines and variable darker shading, with a wingspan that ranges from 20 to 32 mm. The moths of this species are nocturnal and tend to be attracted to light.

A nuptial gift is a nutritional gift given by one partner in some animals' sexual reproduction practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in birds</span>

Sexual selection in birds concerns how birds have evolved a variety of mating behaviors, with the peacock tail being perhaps the most famous example of sexual selection and the Fisherian runaway. Commonly occurring sexual dimorphisms such as size and color differences are energetically costly attributes that signal competitive breeding situations. Many types of avian sexual selection have been identified; intersexual selection, also known as female choice; and intrasexual competition, where individuals of the more abundant sex compete with each other for the privilege to mate. Sexually selected traits often evolve to become more pronounced in competitive breeding situations until the trait begins to limit the individual's fitness. Conflicts between an individual fitness and signaling adaptations ensure that sexually selected ornaments such as plumage coloration and courtship behavior are “honest” traits. Signals must be costly to ensure that only good-quality individuals can present these exaggerated sexual ornaments and behaviors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in insects</span>

Sexual selection in insects is about how sexual selection functions in insects. The males of some species have evolved exaggerated adornments and mechanisms for self-defense. These traits play a role in increasing male reproductive expectations by triggering male-male competition or influencing the female mate choice, and can be thought of as functioning on three different levels: individuals, colonies, and populations within an area.

Inbreeding avoidance, or the inbreeding avoidance hypothesis, is a concept in evolutionary biology that refers to the prevention of the deleterious effects of inbreeding. Animals only rarely exhibit inbreeding avoidance. The inbreeding avoidance hypothesis posits that certain mechanisms develop within a species, or within a given population of a species, as a result of assortative mating and natural and sexual selection, in order to prevent breeding among related individuals. Although inbreeding may impose certain evolutionary costs, inbreeding avoidance, which limits the number of potential mates for a given individual, can inflict opportunity costs. Therefore, a balance exists between inbreeding and inbreeding avoidance. This balance determines whether inbreeding mechanisms develop and the specific nature of such mechanisms.

<i>Drosophila subobscura</i> Species of insect (fruit fly)

Drosophila subobscura is a species of fruit fly in the family Drosophilidae. Originally found around the Mediterranean, it has spread to most of Europe and the Near East. It has been introduced into the west coasts of Canada, the United States, and Chile. Its closest relative is Drosophila madeirensis, found in the Madeira Islands, followed by D. guanche, found in the Canary Islands. These three species form the D. subobscura species subgroup. When they mate, males and females perform an elaborate courtship dance, in which the female can either turn away to end the mating ritual, or stick out her proboscis in response to the male's, allowing copulation to proceed. D. subobscura has been regarded as a model organism for its use in evolutionary-biological studies.

Drosophila nigrospiracula is a fly species indigenous to the Sonoran Desert, spanning Arizona, Baja California, and part of Sonora, Mexico. D. nigrospiracula share the Sonoran Desert with three other species of Drosophila: D. pachea, D. mettleri, and D. mojavensis. This fly breeds on the decomposing tissues of two species of cacti that are also endemic to the region: cardón (Pachycereus pringlei) and saguaro (Carnegiea gigantea).

Drosophila metlerri, commonly known as the Sonoran Desert fly, is a fly in the genus Drosophila. The species is found in North America and is most concentrated along the southern coast of California and in Mexico. D. mettleri are dependent on plant hosts, namely, the saguaro and cardon cacti. Thus, they are most prevalent in arid, desert conditions. It is able to detoxify chemicals found in the rotting liquid of cacti hosts, which allows it to use otherwise lethal soil as a nesting site.

<i>Drosophila silvestris</i> Species of fly

Drosophila silvestris is a large species of fly in the family Drosophilidae that are primarily black with yellow spots. As a rare species of fruit fly endemic to Hawaii, the fly often experiences reproductive isolation. Despite barriers in nature, D. silvestris is able to breed with D. heteroneura to create hybrid flies in the laboratory.

Hirtodrosophila mycetophaga is a fairly large drosophilid fly, with a mean length of 4.0–4.5 mm. It has thus far only been found in Australia. It mates on bracket fungi, preferentially those with a lighter-colored surface in order to enhance mating displays. In addition to these physical displays, flies emit specific sounds in order to attract and ultimately copulate with females.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Drosophila montana (Fruit fly)". www.uniprot.org. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  2. 1 2 "ITIS Standard Report Page: Drosophila montana". www.itis.gov. Retrieved 30 October 2019.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Parker DJ, Wiberg RA, Trivedi U, Tyukmaeva VI, Gharbi K, Butlin RK, et al. (August 2018). "Inter and Intraspecific Genomic Divergence in Drosophila montana Shows Evidence for Cold Adaptation". Genome Biology and Evolution. 10 (8): 2086–2101. doi:10.1093/gbe/evy147. PMC   6107330 . PMID   30010752.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Patterson JT (15 February 1952). Studies in the genetics of Drosophila. VII, Further articles on genetics, cytology, and taxonomy. University of Texas.
  5. 1 2 Markow TA, O'Grady P (2006). Drosophila: A Guide to Species Identification and Use. Elsevier. p. 131.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Salminen TS, Vesala L, Hoikkala A (December 2012). "Photoperiodic regulation of life-history traits before and after eclosion: egg-to-adult development time, juvenile body mass and reproductive diapause in Drosophila montana". Journal of Insect Physiology. 58 (12): 1541–7. doi:10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.09.007. PMID   23026647.
  7. 1 2 Routtu J (2007). Genetic and phenotypic divergence in Drosophila virilis and D. montana. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä. p. 13. S2CID   56168696.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Samarra FI, Klappert K, Brumm H, Miller PJ (December 2009). "Background noise constrains communication: acoustic masking of courtship song in the fruit fly Drosophila montana". Behaviour. 146 (12): 1635–48. doi:10.1163/156853909X463713. JSTOR   40599636.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Aspi J (1 January 1996). "Larval niche differences between the sibling species, Drosophila montana and D. littoralis(Diptera) in Northern Finland". Entomologica Fennica. 7: 29–38. doi: 10.33338/ef.83885 .
  10. 1 2 3 Parker DJ, Ritchie MG, Kankare M (May 2016). "Preparing for Winter: The Transcriptomic Response Associated with Different Day Lengths in Drosophila montana". G3. 6 (5): 1373–81. doi:10.1534/g3.116.027870. PMC   4856088 . PMID   26976440.
  11. Markow TA, O'grady P (2008). "Reproductive ecology of Drosophila" (PDF). Functional Ecology. British Ecological Society. 22 (5): 747–759. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01457.x .
  12. 1 2 3 4 Mazzi D, Kesäniemi J, Hoikkala A, Klappert K (June 2009). "Sexual conflict over the duration of copulation in Drosophila montana: why is longer better?". BMC Evolutionary Biology. 9 (1): 132. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-132 . PMC   2704186 . PMID   19523190.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Veltsos P, Wicker-Thomas C, Butlin RK, Hoikkala A, Ritchie MG (January 2012). "Sexual selection on song and cuticular hydrocarbons in two distinct populations of Drosophila montana". Ecology and Evolution. 2 (1): 80–94. doi:10.1002/ece3.75. PMC   3297180 . PMID   22408728.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Aspi, Jouni (March 2000). "Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana". Heredity. 84 (3): 273–282. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00655.x. ISSN   1365-2540. PMID   10762398. S2CID   16657098.
  15. Durbin EJ, Yoon JS (1987). "Longevity in the Drosophila virilis Species Group. II. The D. montana Phylad" (PDF). The Ohio Journal of Science. 87: 90–92.
  16. Spieth HT (1979). "The Virilis Group of Drosophila and the Beaver Castor". The American Naturalist. 114 (2): 312–316. doi:10.1086/283479. ISSN   0003-0147. JSTOR   2460228. S2CID   83673603.