Dry cleaning

For the British band, see Dry Cleaning (band). For the film, see Dry Cleaning (film).

A dry-cleaner in East Germany, 1975

Dry cleaning is any cleaning process for clothing and textiles using a solvent other than water. Clothes are instead soaked in a water-free liquid solvent (usually non-polar, as opposed to water which is a polar solvent). Perchloroethylene (known as "perc" for short) is the most commonly used solvent, although other solvents such as various hydrocarbon mixtures, tetrachloroethylene and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane are also used.

A dry-cleaning shop featuring a dry-cleaning machine, washer/dryers, stain removal station and hung clothes, inside a mall in Turkey, 2025.

Most natural fibers can be washed in water but some synthetics (e.g., rayon) react poorly with water and should be dry cleaned if possible. ^[1] If not, this could result in changes in texture, colour, strength, and shape. Additionally, certain specialty fabrics, including silk, acetate and rayon, may also benefit from dry cleaning to prevent damage.

History

Italian dry cleaning machine used in France in the 1960s

French dye-works operator Jean Baptiste Jolly ^{[2] [a]} developed his own method using kerosene and gasoline to clean fabrics. ^[2] He opened the first dry cleaning service in Paris in 1845. ^[4]

Flammability concerns led William Joseph Stoddard, a dry cleaner from Atlanta, to develop in 1924 Stoddard solvent (white spirit) as a slightly less flammable alternative to gasoline-based solvents. ^[5] It was the dominant dry-cleaning solvent in the US until the 1950s when perchloroethylene became the dominant solvent. ^[6]

The use of highly flammable petroleum solvents caused many fires and explosions, resulting in government regulation of dry cleaners.

Shift to chlorinated solvents

After World War I, dry cleaners began using chlorinated solvents. These solvents were much less flammable than petroleum solvents and had improved cleaning power.^{[ citation needed ]} Early solvents were carbon tetrachloride and trichloroethylene (TCE). Carbon tetrachloride was first used as a stain remover in the early 1890s in Germany. TCE was introduced in 1930, it had the downside of being incompatible with acetate dyes and it was later replaced by perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene) which was introduced in 1933. ^[7]

By the mid-1930s, the dry cleaning industry had started to adopt perchloroethylene as the main solvent. It has excellent cleaning power and is nonflammable and compatible with most garments. Because it is stable, perchloroethylene is readily recycled. ^[8]

Mechanism and process

Structure of cellulose, the main constituent of cotton. The many OH groups bind water, leading to swelling of the fabric and leading to wrinkling, which is minimized when these materials are treated with perchloroethylene or other dry cleaning solvents.

Dry cleaning solvents selectively dissolves stains on the article. The solvents are non-polar and tend to selectively extract many compounds that cause stains. Some of these stains would otherwise only dissolve in aqueous detergent mixtures at high temperatures, potentially damaging delicate fabrics. Non-polar solvents are also good for some fabrics, especially natural fibres, as the solvent does not interact with any polar groups within the fabric. Water binds to these polar groups (hydroxyls in the cellulose for example) which results in the swelling and stretching of proteins within fibers during laundering. Also, the binding of water molecules interferes with weak attractions within the fiber, resulting in the loss of the fiber's original shape. After the laundry cycle, water molecules will evaporate. However, the original shape of the fibers has already been distorted and this commonly results in shrinkage. Non-polar solvents prevent this interaction, protecting more delicate fabrics. The usage of an effective solvent coupled with mechanical friction from tumbling effectively removes stains.

A dry cleaning machine is similar to a combination of a domestic washing machine and clothes dryer. Garments are placed in the washing or extraction chamber (referred to as the "basket" or "drum"), which constitutes the core of the machine. The washing chamber contains a horizontal-axis, perforated drum that rotates within an outer shell. The shell holds the solvent while the rotating drum holds the garment load. During the wash cycle, the chamber is filled approximately one-third full of solvent and begins to rotate, agitating the clothing. The solvent temperature is maintained at 30 °C (86 °F) or lower, as a higher temperature may damage it. During the wash cycle, the solvent in the chamber (commonly known as the "cage" or "tackle box") is passed through a filtration chamber and then fed back into the "cage". This is known as the cycle, and is continued for the wash duration. The solvent is then removed and sent to a distillation unit consisting of a boiler and condenser. The condensed solvent is fed into a separator unit where any remaining water is separated from the solvent, and the refined solvent fed into the clean solvent tank. The ideal flow rate is roughly 8 liters of solvent per kilogram of garments per minute (very approximately one gallon per pound of garments), depending on the size of the machine.

Older dry cleaning machines had analogue control panels and punched cards for cycle programs.

A typical wash cycle lasts for 3–15 minutes depending on the type of garments and degree of soiling. During the first three minutes, solvent-soluble soils dissolve into the perchloroethylene and loose, insoluble soil comes off. It takes 10–12 minutes after the loose soil has come off to remove any ground-in insoluble soil from garments. Machines using hydrocarbon solvents require a wash cycle of at least 25 minutes because of the much slower rate of solvation of solvent-soluble soils. To enhance the solvent's cleaning power, small amounts of special dry-cleaning detergent (0.5–1.25%) may be added to the working solvent. These detergents emulsify hydrophobic soils and keep soil from redepositing on garments. Depending on the machine's design, either an anionic or a cationic detergent is used. ^[8]

At the end of the wash cycle, the machine starts a rinse cycle where the garment load is rinsed with freshly distilled solvent dispensed from the solvent tank. This pure solvent rinse prevents discoloration caused by soil particles being deposited back into the garment from the "dirty" working solvent. After the rinse cycle, the machine begins the extraction process, which recovers the solvent for reuse. Modern machines recover over 90% of the solvent employed. ^[6] The extraction cycle begins by draining the solvent from the washing chamber and accelerating the basket to 350–450  rpm, causing much of the solvent to spin free of the fabric. Until this time, the cleaning is done at normal temperature, as the solvent is never heated during the dry cleaning process. When no more solvent can be spun out, the machine starts the drying cycle.

During the drying cycle, the garments are tumbled in a stream of warm air (60–63 °C; 140–145 °F) that circulates throughout the basket, evaporating traces of solvent left after the spin cycle. The air temperature is controlled to prevent heat damage to the garments. The exhausted warm air from the machine then passes through a chiller unit where solvent vapors are condensed and returned to the distilled solvent tank. Modern dry cleaning machines use a closed-loop system in which the chilled air is reheated and recirculated. This results in high solvent recovery rates and reduced air pollution. In the early days of dry cleaning, large amounts of perchloroethylene were vented to the atmosphere because it was regarded as cheap and believed to be harmless. After the drying cycle is complete, a deodorizing (aeration) cycle cools the garments and removes further traces of solvent by circulating cool outside air over the garments and then through a vapor recovery filter made from activated carbon and polymer resins. After the aeration cycle, the garments are clean and ready for pressing and finishing.

Not all stains can be removed by dry cleaning. Some need to be treated with spotting solvents –sometimes by steam jet or by soaking in special stain-remover liquids –before garments are washed or dry cleaned. Also, garments which have been stored in soiled condition for a long time are difficult to bring back to their original color and texture, since irreversible chemical reactions (such as oxidation) may occur over time.

Machinery

A modern multisolvent dry cleaning machine with touchscreen and PLC control, designed for use with hydrocarbon mixtures and D5. Manufacturer: EazyClean, model EC124. Photo taken prior to installation.

Dry-cleaning machines are classified into several generations: ^{[6] [9] [10]}

• First generation machines consisted of two separate units, used until the late 1960s. One unit was solely for the washing and other one was for drying, dry-cleaned clothes would be manually taken to the dryer unit by the operator. Machines of this era were described as "vented"; their drying exhausts were expelled into the atmosphere, the same as many modern tumble-dryer exhausts. This contributed to environmental contamination, and much potentially reusable solvent was lost to the atmosphere.
• Second generation machines combined both washer and dryer functions, still vented vapours outside. Such machines are still called "dry-to-dry".
• Third generation machines (late 1970s to early 1980s) included mechanisms to reduce vapour emissions and recover the solvent.
• Fourth generation machines included internal vapour recycling by capturing solvent vapours from the air inside the machine, often having carbon filters to clean used solvent. These machines were almost fully close-circuit. In enclosed machines, solvent extracted during the drying process is recovered and purified by distillation, so it can be reused to clean further loads or safely disposed of. Most modern enclosed machines also incorporate a computer-controlled drying sensor, which automatically senses when all detectable traces of PCE have been removed. This system ensures that only small amounts of PCE fumes are released at the end of the cycle.
• Fifth generation machines added special sensors to capture higher concentrations of solvent in the air. This generation of machines have automatic locks on the lid to prevent opening unless the solvent inside the chamber has been reduced to below 300 parts per million concentration in the air inside.

Infrastructure

Many dry cleaners place cleaned clothes inside thin clear plastic garment bags.

From the customer's perspective, dry cleaning businesses are either "plants" or "drop shops". The former does on-site cleaning, while a drop shop receives garments from customers, sends them to a large plant, and then has the cleaned garments returned to the shop for pickup by the customer. The latter setup minimized the risk of fire or dangerous fumes created by the cleaning process. An older dry-cleaning setup was the "coin-op" machines which were operated by the customers themselves. Coin-op machines were mostly seen in North America and went into decline in late 20th century. ^[8]

Main solvents

It is estimated that 50% to 70% of dry cleaners in the US were using PCE as of 2012 ^[update] . ^[11] Alternative solvents are available, but these may require major changes in equipment, procedures, and operator training. Flammable solvents may require installation of expensive fire-suppression systems. Because PCE has been the longtime de facto solvent for dry cleaning, there is considerable interest in finding a "drop-in" substitute solvent which could be used with minimal changes to existing equipment and procedures. ^[11]

Perchloroethylene

Perchloroethylene (PCE or perc, tetrachloroethylene) is the main solvent in dry cleaning and it has been in use since the 1930s. PCE is the most common solvent, the standard for cleaning performance. It is a highly effective cleaning solvent with a KB-value of 90, ^[12] and it is thermally stable, nonflammable, recyclable, and has very low toxicity and a pleasant smell. PCE is recycled by distillation at its boiling point (121 °C). Unlike the related dry-cleaning solvent carbon tetrachloride, perchloroethylene is not an ozone-depleting substance. ^[13] Perchloroethylene can cause color bleeding/loss, especially at higher temperatures. In some cases it may damage special trims, buttons and beads on some garments. It is better for oil-based stains than more common water-soluble stains. It does not leave smell on dry-cleaned clothes.

P300 model dry cleaning machine with PLC control designed for use with perchloroethylene. Manufactured by BÖWE Textile Cleaning; Germany.

Inhalation of high concentrations of perchloroethylene can produce narcotic and hallucinogenic effects, thus perchloroethylene is regarded as a mild neurotoxin and these effects are completely reversible upon the cessation of exposure. The toxicity of perchloroethylene is moderate to low and reports of human injury are uncommon despite its wide usage in dry cleaning and degreasing. ^[14] Perchloroethylene is classified as "probably carcinogenic to humans" (Group 2A) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). There is a suspicion that it is carcinogenic to humans in long term, but the evidence is limited since most of the evaluated dry-cleaners had heavy smoking and drinking habits which are known carcinogens and were exposed to many other chemicals at the workplace. ^[15] A study published in 2011, investigated cancer rates among dry cleaners exposed to perchloroethylene for many years and laundry workers who did wet cleaning without using this chemical as the control group, based on a total of more than nine thousand people, found that there was no difference in the cancer rates between the two groups: there was no significant increase in the incidence of esophageal, cervical, liver, kidney and bladder cancers, which were previously suspected to be caused by perchloroethylene, between the two groups. ^[16] The exposure to perchloroethylene in a typical dry cleaner is considered far below the levels required to cause any risk. ^[17]

Hydrocarbons

Hydrocarbon mixtures have KB values between 27-45. ^[8] Hydrocarbons have been used in dry cleaning since the early years (19th century). Early hydrocarbon solvents used were kerosene and the less flammable Stoddard solvent (also called "white spirit") is a mixture of over 65% C₁₀ or higher hydrocarbons, has a relatively low flash point of 38 °C (100 °F) ^[18]

High flash hydrocarbons, characterized as having a flash point higher than 60 °C (140 °F), are considered to be safer than traditional hydrocarbon solvents. ^{[11] : 18–19} Examples include Exxon-Mobil's DF-2000 or Chevron Phillips' EcoSolv, and Pure Dry. These petroleum-based solvents are less aggressive but also less effective than PCE. Although hydrocarbons are combustible, risk of fire or explosion can be minimized when they are used properly; a fire-suppression system may also be required. Hydrocarbons are considered to be volatile organic (VOC) pollutants. ^{[11] : 18–19}

Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane

An Italian dry cleaning machine for decamethylcyclopentasiloxane used in Turkey in the 2020s. It uses various filters to clean used solvent.

Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (colloquially known as "siloxane" or "liquid silicone", trademarked Siloxane D5), ^{[11] : 25} was initially popularized by GreenEarth Cleaning in the 1990s. ^[19] It is more expensive than PCE and requires GreenEarth licence. ^[11] It is insufficient in dissolving oils and grease, compared to PCE. It has the lowest KB value (13) of all dry-cleaning solvents. ^[12] Dry cleaning machines using decamethylcyclopentasiloxane have a filtering system instead of a still like PCE machines. It is marketed as an eco-friendly product that degrades quickly in the environment, but is controlled in the European Union due to its persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic characteristics. ^[20] Its use in dry cleaning will be prohibited in the European Union after June 2026 due to its environmental effects. ^[21] It does not degrade in nature and has high bioaccumulative properties unlike perchloroethylene. It is likely to be an endocrine disruptor similar to the related siloxane D4.

Other solvents: niche and emerging

For decades, efforts have been made to replace PCE. These alternatives have not proven popular thus far:

• Glycol ethers (also called "propylene glycol ethers") are a class of organic solvents which were introduced in the 1990s as an alternative to PCE. ^{[11] : 23–24} These solvent mixes are flammable, but are considered comparable to high flash hydrocarbons in fire hazard. They are not considered to be carcinogenic, and have relatively benign persistence and environmental effects. ^{[11] : 23–24}
• Dibutoxymethane (formaldehyde dibutyl acetal, also referred to as "butylal", loosely referred to as "acetal", and trademarked as SolvonK4) ^{[11] : 21} is a bipolar solvent that removes water-based stains and oil-based stains. ^{[22] [11]} Because the solvent is relatively new in cleaning applications, there has been relatively little specific research into health and environmental effects. ^{[11] : 21–22}

A modern dry cleaning machine by Union for use with SolvonK4 (dibutoxymethane).

• Brominated solvents (such as n-propyl bromide, Fabrisolv, DrySolv) are solvents with higher KB-values than PCE (n-propyl bromide has a KB value of 129, compared to 90 of PCE) ^[23] . This allows faster cleaning, but can damage some synthetic beads and sequins if not used correctly. Machines used with n-propyl bromide were converted PCE machines. ^[24] Healthwise, there are reported risks associated with nPB such as permanent numbness of nerves. ^[25] Environmentally, it is approved by the US EPA. It is among the more expensive solvents, but it has advantages of faster cleaning, lower temperatures, and quick drying times. In 2016, the state of Massachusetts listed the solvent as a "Higher Hazard Substance" due to increased concerns about its health and environmental effects. ^[26]
• Liquid or supercritical CO₂ is a suggested alternative solvent; however, it is inferior to perchloroethylene and hydrocarbons in removing some forms of grime. ^{[27] [11]} Additive surfactants improve the efficacy of CO₂. ^[28] Machinery for use of CO₂ is expensive –up to $90,000 more than a PCE machine, making affordability difficult for small businesses. Some cleaners with these machines keep traditional machines on-site for more-heavily soiled textiles, but others find plant-derived enzymes to be equally effective and more environmentally sustainable. Carbon dioxide is almost entirely nontoxic (but is an asphyxiant risk in high concentrations). ^[11] The CO₂ dry cleaning process involves charging a sealed chamber which has been loaded with clothes, using gaseous carbon dioxide from a storage vessel to approximately 200 to 300 psi (14 to 21 bar) of pressure. This step in the process is initiated as a precaution to avoid thermal shock to the cleaning chamber. Liquid carbon dioxide is then pumped into the cleaning chamber from a separate storage vessel by a hydraulic or electrically driven pump (which preferably has dual pistons). The pump increases the pressure of the liquid carbon dioxide to approximately 900 to 1,500 psi (62 to 103 bar). A separate sub-cooler reduces the temperature of the carbon dioxide by 2 to 3 °C (3.6 to 5.4 °F) below the boiling point, in an effort to prevent cavitation which could lead to premature degradation of the pump. ^[29]

Consumer Reports rated CO₂ "superior to conventional methods", but the Drycleaning and Laundry Institute commented on its "fairly low cleaning ability" in a 2007 report. ^[30] CO₂ is a mild solvent overall, which lowers its ability to aggressively attack stains. One deficiency with CO₂ is that its electrical conductivity is low. As mentioned in the Mechanism and process section, dry cleaning utilizes both chemical and mechanical properties to remove stains. When solvent interacts with the fabric's surface, the friction dislocates dirt. At the same time, the friction also builds up an electrical charge. Fabrics are very poor conductors, but usually this build-up of static electricity is dissipated through the solvent. This discharge does not occur in liquid carbon dioxide, and the build-up of an electrical charge on the surface of the fabric attracts the dirt back on to the surface, diminishing the cleaning efficiency.^{[ citation needed ]} To compensate for the poor solubility and conductivity of supercritical carbon dioxide, research has focused on additives. For increased solubility, 2-propanol has shown increased cleaning effects for liquid carbon dioxide, as it increases the ability of the solvent to dissolve polar compounds. ^[31]

Obsolete solvents

• Trichloroethylene (TCE) is more aggressive (has a KB value of 129) ^[12] than the chemically related PCE and 1,1,1-trichloroethane but is still used as a stain remover today. With superior degreasing properties, it was often used for industrial workwear/overalls cleaning in the past. It had a tendency to dissolve acetate dyes. Trichloroethylene was introduced in 1930 but it was mostly replaced by PCE in the 1950s. ^[7] Most common health hazard of TCE is its anaesthetic effects. TCE is a human carcinogen (classified as such by International Agency for Research on Cancer and United States Environmental Protection Agency), albeit a weak one. ^[32]
• Carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄) was once widely used in dry cleaning as the first chlorinated solvent, but its use was abandoned after its high hepatotoxicity was discovered. It was one of strongest (KB value: 136) ^[12] among the many solvents used in dry-cleaning.
• 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (methylchloroform, chlorothene) was also used in dry cleaning, until its use was banned due to its harmful effects on the ozone layer.
• CFC-113 (Freon-113, Valclene, Arklone), a Chlorofluorocarbon, is now banned for being a ozone-depleting substance. It has a KB value of 30. ^[12] It was introduced to dry cleaning in 1961 by DuPont. ^[33] In 1986, 489 dry-cleaning facilities (about 2.2% of 21,787 dry-cleaning facilities) in the US were using CFC-113 as their main solvent. ^[34]

Solvent reprocessing

Solvent reprocessing machinery (Germany)

Working solvent from the washing chamber passes through several filtration steps before it is returned to the washing chamber. The first step is a button trap, which prevents small objects such as lint, fasteners, buttons, and coins from entering the solvent pump. After the lint filter, the solvent passes through an absorptive cartridge filter. This filter, which contains activated clays and activated charcoal, removes fine insoluble soil residues, non-volatile residues, and dyes from the solvent. Finally, the solvent passes through a polishing filter, which removes any contaminants not previously removed. The clean solvent is then returned to the working solvent tank.

A Firbimatic Saver Series dry cleaning machine for nonaliphatic (cyclic) solvents. This machine uses activated clay filtration instead of distillation. It uses much less energy than conventional methods.

Over time, a thin layer of filter cake (called "muck") accumulates on the lint filter. The muck is removed regularly (commonly once per day) and then processed to recover solvent trapped in the muck. Many machines use "spin disk filters", which remove the muck from the filter by centrifugal force while it is back washed with solvent. "Cooked powder residue" is the name for the waste material generated by cooking down or distilling muck. It will contain residual solvent, powdered filter material (diatomite), carbon, non-volatile residues, lint, dyes, grease, soils, and water. The waste sludge or solid residue from the still contains residual solvent, water, soils, carbon, and other non-volatile residues. Used filters are another form of waste, as is waste water, which are also subject to regulation by local environmental authorities (such as Environmental Protection Agency in the United States). ^[11]

Garment compatibility

Garments should be carefully checked for foreign objects before being placed in the machine. Items such as plastic pens may dissolve in the solvent bath, damaging the entire batch of textiles. Certain textile dyes are "loose" and will shed dye during solvent immersion.

Fragile items, such as feather bedspreads or tasseled rugs or hangings, may be protected by enclosing them in a loose mesh bag. The density of perchloroethylene is around 1.62 g/cm³ at room temperature (62% heavier than water), and the sheer weight of absorbed solvent may cause the textile to fail under typical forces during the spin extraction cycle, unless the mesh bag provides mechanical support.

Care symbols

The international GINETEX laundry symbol for dry cleaning is a circle. It may have the letter "P" inside it to indicate perchloroethylene solvent, or the letter "F" to indicate a flammable solvent (German: Feuergefährliches Schwerbenzin). A bar underneath the circle indicates that only mild cleaning processes are recommended. A crossed-out empty circle indicates that an item should not be dry cleaned at all. ^[35]

• 
  Professional cleaning symbol
• 
  Dry clean, perchloroethylene (PCE) only
• 
  Gentle cleaning with PCE
• 
  Very gentle cleaning with PCE
• 
  Dry clean, hydrocarbon solvent only (HCS)
• 
  Gentle cleaning with hydrocarbon solvents
• 
  Very gentle cleaning with hydrocarbon solvents
• 
  Do not dry clean

See also

• Fabric restoration
• List of laundry topics
• Wet cleaning

Notes

1. In some sources incorrectly ^[3] referred to as "Jolly-Belin"

References

1. Hunter, Jennifer (22 May 2019). "Dry Cleaning Your Wool Sweaters? Don't Bother". The New York Times . Archived from the original on 30 May 2019. Retrieved 30 May 2019.
2. Oladele Ogunseitan (3 May 2011). Green Health: An A-to-Z Guide. SAGE Publications. pp. 135–. ISBN   978-1-4522-6621-3.
3. Ancliffe Prince (1965). Laundering and Cleaning: Yesterday, To-day, and To-morrow. Iliffe Technical Publications. In Britain America the discovery was for long attributed to a supposed Paris tailor by name of Jolly-Belin [...] Actually the discoverer of drycleaning was not named Jolly-Belin but Jean-Baptiste Jell
4. New Scientist. Reed Business Information. 13 February 1986. pp. 33–. ISSN   0262-4079.^{[ permanent dead link ]}
5. Environmental law handbook. Sullivan, Thomas F. P., Bell, Christopher L. (21st ed.). Lanham, Md.: Government Institutes. 2011. ISBN   9781605907253. OCLC   757405855.
6. "Cleaning Up the Dry Cleaning Standard". www.nfpa.org. Archived from the original on 18 March 2019. Retrieved 2017-11-19.
7. Morrison, R. D.; Murphy, B. L. (2015). Chlorinated Solvents: A Forensic Evaluation. UK: Royal Society of Chemistry. ISBN 9781782626077.
8. Tirsell, David C. (2000). "Dry Cleaning". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. doi:10.1002/14356007.a09_049. ISBN   3527306730.
9. The History of Dry Cleaning Solvents and the Evolution of the Dry Cleaning Machine - Enviroforensics
10. Control of Health and Safety Hazards in Commercial Dry Cleaners: Chemical Exposures, Fire Hazards, and Ergonomic Risk Factors - NIOSH
11. "Assessment of Alternatives to Perchloroethylene for the Dry Cleaning Industry" (PDF). TURI: Toxics Use Reduction Institute. UMass Lowell. June 2012. Retrieved 2023-09-23.
12. Chemicals Used in Drycleaning Operations - Association of State & Territorial Solid Waste Management Officials
13. Wuebbles, D. J.; Patten, K. O.; Wang, D.; Youn, D.; Martínez-Avilés, M.; Francisco, J. S. (2011). "Three-dimensional model evaluation of the Ozone Depletion Potentials for n-propyl bromide, trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene". Atmos. Chem. Phys. Vol 11. p. 2371-2380. doi:10.5194/acp-11-2371-2011.
14. E.-L. Dreher; T. R. Torkelson; K. K. Beutel (2011). "Chlorethanes and Chloroethylenes". Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH. doi:10.1002/14356007.o06_o01. ISBN   978-3527306732.
15. "Tetrachloroethylene (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 63, 1995)". www.inchem.org. Archived from the original on 2023-03-29. Retrieved 2023-09-25.
16. Seldén, AI; Ahlborg, G (2011). "Cancer morbidity in Swedish dry-cleaners and laundry workers: historically prospective cohort study". Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 84 (4).
17. Azimi Pirsaraei, S. R.; Khavanin, A; Asilian, H; Soleimanian, A (2009). "Occupational exposure to perchloroethylene in dry-cleaning shops in Tehran, Iran". Industrial Health. 47 (2): 155–9. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.47.155 . PMID   19367044.
18. "STODDARD SOLVENT". hazard.com. Archived from the original on 2020-11-27. Retrieved 2017-11-19.
19. Tarantola, Andrew (16 September 2014). "There's a Better Way to Dry Clean Your Clothes". Gizmodo . Archived from the original on 2014-09-16. Retrieved 2016-08-29.
20. Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/35 of 10 January 2018 amending Annex XVII to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane (‘D4’) and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (‘D5’) (Text with EEA relevance. ), 2018-01-10, retrieved 2023-08-10
21. EU Commission Announces New Restrictions on D4, D5, and D6
22. Ceballos, Diana M.; Whittaker, Stephen G.; Lee, Eun Gyung; Roberts, Jennifer; Streicher, Robert; Nourian, Fariba; Gong, Wei; Broadwater, Kendra (2016). "Occupational exposures to new dry cleaning solvents: High-flashpoint hydrocarbons and butylal". Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. 13 (10): 759–769. doi:10.1080/15459624.2016.1177648. PMC   5511734 . PMID   27105306.
23. Kanegsberg, Barbara; Kanegsberg, Edward (2000-12-26). Handbook for Critical Cleaning. CRC Press. ISBN   978-1-4200-3982-5.
24. Smith, Carr J; Perfetti, Thomas A; Morford, Richard G (2020-01-01). "Use of 1-bromopropane (N-propyl bromide) in dry cleaning is rare and rapidly declining toward obsolescence". Toxicology Research and Application. 4: 2397847320966961. doi: 10.1177/2397847320966961 . ISSN   2397-8473. S2CID   228978817.
25. "HAZARD EVALUATION 1-Bromopropane" Archived 2013-11-06 at the Wayback Machine July 2003. Accessed 2014-Jan-22
26. "Massachusetts Chemical Fact Sheet: N-propyl bromide" (PDF). TURI: Toxics Use Reduction Institute. UMass Lowell. October 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2023-11-03. Retrieved 2023-09-23.
27. "Dry-cleaning with CO2 wins award [Science] Resource". Resource.wur.nl. 2010-10-12. Archived from the original on 2012-03-12. Retrieved 2013-03-14.
28. Mohamed, Azmi. "How can we use carbon dioxide as a solvent?". Contemporary topics in school science. Archived from the original on 2019-12-24. Retrieved 2016-08-29.
29. "Liquid/supercritical carbon dioxide/dry cleaning system". 1993-12-06. Archived from the original on 2022-04-09. Retrieved 2021-01-02.
30. Drycleaning and Laundry Institute. "The DLI White Paper: Key Information on Industry Solvents." The Western Cleaner & Launderer, August 2007.
31. US 5784905,Townsend, Carl W.; Chao, Sidney C.& Purer, Edna M.,"Liquid carbon dioxide cleaning system employing a static dissipating fluid",published 1998-07-28 
32. Costa, A. K.; Ivanevitch, K. M. (1984). "Chlorinated Ethylenes". Carcinogenesis. 12 (1629).
33. Coin-Op 1961-04: Vol 2 Iss 4 P. 61
34. A Chronology of Historical Developments in Drycleaning (November 2007)
35. "Professional textile care symbols". GINETEX - Swiss Association for Textile Labelling. Archived from the original on 2013-05-28. Retrieved 2013-07-18.

External links

• Hazard Summary provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
• NIOSH Safety and Health Topic: Drycleaning