Edalorhina perezi

Last updated

Edalorhina perezi
Edalorhina perezi Peru 01.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Amphibia
Order: Anura
Family: Leptodactylidae
Genus: Edalorhina
Species:
E. perezi
Binomial name
Edalorhina perezi
Jiménez de la Espada, 1871
Synonyms

Bubonias plicifronsCope, 1874
Edalorhina buckleyiBoulenger, 1882

Contents

Edalorhina perezi (Perez's snouted frog) is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is one of the only two species in the genus Edalorhina in the family Leptodactylidae. This species is diurnal and terrestrial. During mating season both female and male frogs gather around treefall pools. [2] It is found in Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru, [3] and possibly Bolivia. [1] Its natural habitats are subtropical or tropical moist lowland forests, subtropical or tropical moist montane forests, and freshwater marshes. [1] The species listed as least concern on the IUCN Red List and the population is stable.

Description

General Identification

Ventral color Ventral color - Edalorhina perezi.jpg
Ventral color
Dorsal color Dorsal color - Edalorhina perezi.jpg
Dorsal color

Adult

Similar to many other frog species, female Perez’s snouted frogs (E. perezi) are larger than males. Males are on average 28-36 mm in size and the females are 35-40 mm. The general color of this frog is very similar to leaf litter, which is a cryptic color protection in its habitat. Dorsum skin color is brown and there are usually many random dark brown markings on the back, such as tubercles and longitudinal ridges. Distinct characteristics of this frog include its eyelids, which have conical tubercles growing around the edge, a vertical ridge between the eyes, and the underdeveloped vomerine teeth. [2] The iris is bronze and has some radiating grayish-brown lines. The body is a concaved shape with the spine dips down, differentiating the species from its sister taxon. The ventral side is smooth and white, with large black dots at lateral and posterior areas. The limbs are barred and the groin has an orange color decorated with black dots. It has unwebbed toes as a terrestrial frog species, and the first and second toes are of equal length. [4] The snout of this frog is pointed, but the mouth part of the other species E. nasuta in the same genus looks sharper because of a long, fleshy proboscis. This sister species also differs from E. perezi by having smaller eyelid tubercles. [2] A similar species from another genus is Physalaemus petersi, which also has an orange groin, but this species doesn’t has eyelid tubercles and has a different black and white belly pattern. P. petersi also has a gray throat and chest that is also different from the Perez’s snouted frog. [5] [4] There are several small but marked differences between them and their closely related species. [5]

Offspring

Tadpoles in genus Edalorhina , which is the genus of the Perez’s snouted frog, are generally similar to most tadpoles of closely related taxa, but they have a distinct terminal oral discs. The existence of a dextral vent tube is a common trait for the clade consisting of Edalorhina, Engystomops, and Physalaemus. Within the clade, Edalorhina is unique for having two lingual papillae bordered around the anteroventrally directed mouth, a filiform median ridge, and a lack of buccal roof papillae. The total head-tail length ranges from 14 mm to 29.7 mm. [2] [6] The body length is around 5 mm and is wider than it is deep. [2] The tadpoles have small eyes that are widely separated at each side of the front of the body. The nostril position has been described dorsolaterally and anterolaterally. The oral disc has also been described both as terminal and ventral. These contradictory descriptions might reflect the intraspecific diversity of the tadpoles. E. perezi tadpoles have a posteriorly directed sinistral spiracle and a short anal tube. The dorsal fin only grows on the tail. The general color of the tadpole is pale brown with streaks of darker brown shades dorsally and laterally. [7] [6]

Taxonomy

Perez’s snouted frog, Edalorhina perezi, is in the genus Edalorhina and family Leptodactylidae . The only two species in this genus are E. perezi and E. nasuta. Previous studies addressing phylogeny have mostly focusing on morphological, behavioral and karyotypical differences. An earlier morphological and behavioral study considered Edalorhina to be most closely related to the families Lithodytes and Physalaemus as all of them construct foam nests. [5] In a later cytogenetics study, the analysis of all 22 chromosomes of this frog also suggested the close relationship between Edalorhina and Physalaemus, while Pleurodema is relatively less related to Edalorhina. [8] However, the precise phylogenetic relationships of Edalorhina are still under a debate. [8] [5] [9]

Geographical variation

Studies have shown that there are large variations in Perez’s snouted frog’s morphology. [2] [5] An early study conducted by Dunn in 1949 examined 52 specimens and revealed dissimilarity in vomerine teeth and dorsal skin structure. [5] The study classified this species into three morphs: perezi, plicifrons and buckleyi. The Perezi type has a dermal ridge between the eyes and vomerine teeth, but it lacks longitudinal warts on the back. Plicifrons, on the other hand, has longitudinal warts, but lacks vomerine teeth and dermal ridge. Buckleyi looks similar to Plicifrons, but it has vomerine teeth. Dunn also noticed that certain appearances are more common in distinct areas of the species' range. For example, 86.6% of the specimens from Ecuador are perezi type, while in the Peruvian specimens this type only accounts for 62.5%. There are also other obvious geographical differences, such as absence of vomerine teeth and the development of a wart on the snout tip. [4] A later study in 1990 by Duellman dug deeper into this topic by looking into dorsal skin structure and ventral color pattern. The dorsal patterns were classified into five categories based on smoothness, and each geographical area was dominated by populations of a specific type of pattern. The ventral color was also classified into five groups based on the pattern of black and white patches. The range of each group is highly correlated with the distribution of river systems, which include Rio Purus, Rio Madre de Dios, Rio Ucayali, and Rio Tapiche. One explanation for why populations of Perez’s snout frog differ so much from each other is historical climatic-ecological changes. During Pleistocene, the rivers coming down from Andes carried a greater volume of melting galcier water than today, thus isolating the frogs into different basins and causing these populations to evolve independently. The present-day pattern categories also correspond to geographical segregation in history. [2]

Habitat and distribution

Perez’s snouted frog is commonly found in the upper Amazon Basin in Ecuador and Peru. Its sister species E. nasuta has a much smaller range and is only found in Peru. Some populations of E. perezi are also documented in southern Colombia and Brazil. They range from basins that are only 200m in elevation to 1100m on the eastern slopes of the Andes Mountains. They are a diurnal and terrestrial frog species. Typical habitats are forest floors covered with leaf litter in lowland tropical rainforests. [2] They are well adapted to both primary and secondary forests. [5]

Diet

Perez's snouted frog is a "sit-and-wait" predator that relies on its cryptic coloration to hide from prey. [10] This allows the frog to prey on mobile arthropods such as cockroaches, spiders, and crickets in the leaf litter. It is thought E. perezi only feeds a few times per day.

Tadpoles primarily feed on detritus in the bottom of the pools where they hatch, although there have been reports of tadpoles cannibalizing eggs and other larvae. [11]

Mating

Perez’s snouted frogs breed opportunistically, usually right after a storm. During amplexus, females usually carry males to the edge of the pool, where they build foam nests together. Water is important for nest making so females always drink water before amplexus. The female is attracted by male's advertisement call and moves towards the calling male. During mating season, the frog is equally active during the day and night. Amplexus can last as long as six days, but the actual mating only takes place for four to six hours. The female first releases a signal for foam nest construction by arching its back. Then, the male immediately puts its feet near the female’s cloacal region and forms a collecting basket, where fertilization occurs. After this, the male raises its legs to water level and starts to beat the female’s foam secretion with the purpose of smoothing the surface. The beating lasts about 10–12 seconds with about 45 beats. After 45 seconds the female does the back-arching signal again, and the whole set of movements repeat. The construction of a foam nest usually takes 30 to 60 minutes. [7]

Calls and Vocalizations

Male Perez’s snouted frogs can produce different types of sounds, but a typical one that can be heard from long distance is considered as an advertisement call, which consists of a series of three to five short, low whistles and two pulses per note. [2]  There is also another pre-mating call that has double pulses and a constant repetition rate. The dominant frequency is 1800–2700 Hz, and harmonics are concentrated at 4500-5600 and 700–7800 Hz. [7]

Male calling site choice is slightly different from female oviposition site choice because they face different selective pressures. Although both females and males avoid high-predation risk pools and benefit from a high offspring survival rate, males are less sensitive to the potential biotic and abiotic risks offspring will face. When choosing a site, male frogs focus more on predation avoidance and reducing competition for females, but females consider more about potential offspring survival. Thus, male are more likely to use a place that is poor for offspring but has a low predation risk and low competition for mates. [12] [13]

Parental care

Female Perez’s snouted frogs breed every four weeks under laboratory conditions. [12] [13] Females lay 30-154 small unpigmented eggs, 2.1 mm in diameter, in a foam nest about 60mm. [2] The foam nest protects eggs and early tadpoles. In ideal conditions foam can protect tadpoles in dry pools for up to 13 days, with 50% survival up to 10 days. However, to complete larval development, at least two weeks in water is needed. Thus, in a neotropical forest with stable temperature but seasonal rainfall, the uncertainty of precipitation has a strong influence on the frog’s reproductive success. [12]

Perez’s snouted frog prefer treefall pools (holes at the roots of large fallen trees), either temporal or permanent, to lay their eggs. These kind of treefall holes are a common nesting site for many other tree frogs and poison-dart frogs. A three-year study done by Murphy demonstrated the risk-sensitive oviposition strategy of Perez’s snouted frogs. [12] The three major risks for Perez’s snouted frog offspring are desiccation, insect predation, and intraspecific competition. For the two external risks, desiccation and predation, there is always a trade-off because predation risk is lower in temporal pools, but the temporary pools can potentially be completely dry. A mark-recapture experiment proved that adults actively select pools that benefit their offspring most based on these three factors. Their decisions are very flexible as they vary across both temporal and spatial scales, instead of being fixed and passively triggered by seasonal changes. In the early rainy season, females normally choose persistent pools, but they switch to ephemeral pools later in the season. This trend is reflected both by change in nest placement and tadpole density in each type of pool across time. The reasoning behind this phenomenon is that rainfall in the transitional period is highly uncertain, so persistent pools provide more stable environment. Later in the season, rainfall becomes more consistent and persistent pools build up insect predators and higher densities of tadpoles, which makes temporal pools relatively better with a lower predation risk and less intense food competition. Female egg-laying position choice is not affected by male calling sites. After mating, females can carry the male to her favorite egg-laying site. [12] [13]

Reproduction and life cycle

Hatching & Tadpole development

Tadpoles start to hatch from eggs three to five days after nest construction at 26°C. The newly emerged tadpoles are white and immobile. They still contain yolk in the gut and lack external gills and adhesive organs. [2] They remain at the bottom of the nest for one day and start feeding the next day. Their color changes from white to cryptic brownish color during week three, and the froglets leave during the fourth week after hatching. [7] Once the tadpoles enter the water, lots of invertebrate predators such as the damselfly, dragonfly, predaceous beetle, and even some vertebrate predators such as the turtle Platemys platicephala can prey on Perez’s snouted frog tadpoles. The time required for a tadpole to develop before it goes through metamorphosis from tadpole to froglet is highly variable, with a range of 21–28 days. Many factors such as pool drying rate, depth, temperature, resource availability, and predator and tadpole density can have an effect. [12] [13]

Protective coloration and behavior

Tadpoles start to develop cryptic brown colorations three weeks after hatching, which persist through adulthoods. [7] An interesting predator defense display of the Perez’s snouted frog is deimatic behavior using their macroglands. Macroglands are also called inguinal or lumbar glands, which are accumulations of serous glands in the sacral region. Although not all species in the family Leiuperinae have this structure, it is commonly found in the Leiperines, Edalorhina, Engystomops, Physalaemus, and Pleurodema families. When a Perez’s snouted frog is frightened, it will face away from the predator and elevate its sacral region to suddenly expose macroglands, which display hidden flash coloration resembling a pair of huge eyes belonging to a large animal. [9]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leptodactylidae</span> Family of amphibians

The southern frogs form the Leptodactylidae, a name that comes from Greek meaning a bird or other animal having slender toes. They are a diverse family of frogs that most likely diverged from other hyloids during the Cretaceous. The family has undergone major taxonomic revisions in recent years, including the reclassification of the former subfamily Eleutherodactylinae into its own family the Eleutherodactylidae; the Leptodactylidae now number 206 species in 13 genera distributed throughout Mexico, the Caribbean, and Central and South America. The family includes terrestrial, burrowing, aquatic, and arboreal members, inhabiting a wide range of habitats.

Parent–offspring conflict (POC) is an expression coined in 1974 by Robert Trivers. It is used to describe the evolutionary conflict arising from differences in optimal parental investment (PI) in an offspring from the standpoint of the parent and the offspring. PI is any investment by the parent in an individual offspring that decreases the parent's ability to invest in other offspring, while the selected offspring's chance of surviving increases.

<i>Physalaemus nattereri</i> Species of amphibian

Physalaemus nattereri is a frog native to central and southeastern Brazil and eastern Bolivia and Paraguay.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fletcher's frog</span> Species of amphibian

Fletcher's frog, commonly known as the sandpaper frog or black-soled frog, is a species of nocturnal, terrestrial frog native to eastern Australia. It is primarily found in wet sclerophyll forests along mountain ranges and the coast.

<i>Leptodactylus labyrinthicus</i> Species of frog

Leptodactylus labyrinthicus is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. Its common names are labyrinth frog, pepper frog, South American pepper frog, and pepper foam frog. This frog is found in central and southeastern Brazil, northeast Argentina, and eastern Paraguay. Earlier reports from Bolivia refer to Leptodactylus vastus, or possibly an unnamed species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smoky jungle frog</span> Species of amphibian

The smoky jungle frog is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is found in Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Costa Rica, Panama, French Guiana, Perú and Venezuela. Its natural habitats are tropical and subtropical moist broadleaf forests, subtropical or tropical swamps, subtropical or tropical moist montane forest, rivers, freshwater marshes, intermittent freshwater marshes, and aquaculture ponds.

<i>Leptodactylus podicipinus</i> Species of amphibian

Leptodactylus podicipinus, sometimes known as the pointedbelly frog, is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is found in northern Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay, Bolivia, and Brazil.

<i>Lithodytes</i> Genus of amphibians

Lithodytes is a genus of frogs in the family of Leptodactylidae. It is monotypic, being represented by the single species, Lithodytes lineatus, also commonly known as the gold-striped frog or painted antnest frog. It is found in tropical South America where it lives in humid forests among the leaf litter. These frogs build foam nests at the edge of temporary pools, and the tadpoles develop within these. The frogs also associate with certain leafcutter ants and breed inside their nests without being attacked by the ants.

Physalaemus deimaticus is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is endemic to Brazil and only known from its type locality in Jaboticatubas, Serra do Cipó, Minas Gerais. The specific name deimaticus is derived from Greek deimos fror "fear" and refers to the defensive display of this frog, probably aimed at scaring predators. Common names Jaboticatubas dwarf frog and frightening foam froglet have been coined for it.

<i>Physalaemus ephippifer</i> Species of frog

Physalaemus ephippifer is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is found in central and eastern Brazilian Amazonia, the Guianas, and southern Venezuela. It might not occur in French Guiana.

<i>Physalaemus moreirae</i> Species of frog

Physalaemus moreirae is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is endemic to the Serra do Mar in the São Paulo state, Brazil.

Engystomops pustulatus is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is known with certainty from western Ecuador, whereas the status of Peruvian records is ambiguous as they may refer to an undescribed species or possibly Engystomops puyango. Nevertheless, given that E. pustulatus is now known from Huaquillas in southern Ecuador, near the Peruvian border, it is likely to be found in Peru too.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Túngara frog</span> Species of amphibian

The Túngara frog is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is a small nocturnal terrestrial frog found in Mexico, Central America, and the northeastern regions of South America.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grey foam-nest tree frog</span> Species of amphibian

The grey foam-nest tree frog, or southern foam-nest tree frog, is a species of frog in the family Rhacophoridae. They are found in southern Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zimmerman's poison frog</span> Species of amphibian

Ranitomeya variabilis, formerly known as Dendrodates variabilis, is a species of small poison dart frog distributed in northern Peru, along the eastern slope of Andes in the upper Rio Huallaga drainage basin. Its common name, Zimmerman's poison frog, is named after Elke Zimmermann, a German zoologist who described the morph of this species and differentiated it from D. ventrimaculatus. The species was formerly considered to be synonymous with Ranitomeya ventrimaculata.

<i>Leptodactylus fallax</i> Species of amphibian

Leptodactylus fallax, commonly known as the mountain chicken or giant ditch frog, is a critically endangered species of frog that is native to the Caribbean islands of Dominica and Montserrat. The population declined by at least 80% from 1995 to 2004, with further significant declines later. A tiny wild population remains on Dominica where there are efforts to preserve it, but few or none survive in the wild on Montserrat and its survival now relies on a captive breeding project involving several zoos. The initial decline was linked to hunting for human consumption, along with habitat loss and natural disasters, but the most serious threat now appears to be the fungal disease chytridiomycosis, which was the primary cause of the most recent rapid decline. On Montserrat it is known as the mountain chicken, while on Dominica it is known as the crapaud, which is simply the French word for "toad".

<i>Engystomops</i> Genus of amphibians

Engystomops is a genus of frogs in the family Leptodactylidae. They are known commonly as foam frogs or túngara frogs, though the latter name most commonly refers to Engystomops pustulosus. They are native to the Americas from southern Mexico south to the Amazon Basin.

<i>Rhacophorus kio</i> Species of amphibian

Rhacophorus kio is a species of flying frog in the family Rhacophoridae and is found in the rainforests of southeast Asia, in countries such as China, Laos, Thailand, and Vietnam. Its ability to glide and its adhesive toe pads make it well adapted to its habitat of the rainforest. Prior to a 2006 study by Annemarie Ohler and Magali Delorme, R. kio and R. reinwardtii were thought to be the same species. The common name black-webbed treefrog can refer to either species. Compared to other frog species in the area, R. kio not only creates a foam nest that holds their eggs, but also creates a structure with leaves that will wrap around the eggs. While the conservation status of the species is currently classified as of least concern by the IUCN Red List, R. kio faces habitat loss from deforestation to make space for agriculture and other human influences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Leiuperinae</span> Subfamily of amphibians

The Leiuperinae are a subfamily of frogs in the family Leptodactylidae. Over 90 species are in five genera. The distribution of this subfamily is from southern Mexico to the Central America and much of South America.

Pleurodema cordobae is a species of frog in the family Leptodactylidae. It is endemic to the Sierras de Córdoba of Argentina. This endemic species also resides with the highly similar species, Pleurodema kriegi. P. cordobae exhibits particular characteristics that differentiate it from other frogs in the Pleurodema genus, including the fact that the species is octoploid, as compared to the P. kriegi and Pleurodema bibroni, which are tetraploid. P. cordobae inhabits temporary and semi-permanent ponds. As this species is only found in isolated locations such as the Sierra Grande, little is known about its very limited population.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Angulo, Ariadne; Azevedo-Ramos, Claudia; Coloma, Luis A.; Ron, Santiago (2004). "Edalorhina perezi". IUCN Red List of Threatened Species . 2004: e.T56385A11458591. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2004.RLTS.T56385A11458591.en . Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Duellman, William E.; Morales, Victor R. (January 1990). "Variation, distribution, and life history of Edalorhina perezi (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae)". Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 25 (1): 19–30. doi:10.1080/01650529009360798.
  3. Frost, Darrel R. (2013). "Edalorhina perezi Jiménez de la Espada, 1870". Amphibian Species of the World 5.6, an Online Reference. American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 3 December 2013.
  4. 1 2 3 Rodríguez, Lily O.; Duellman, William E. (1994). Guide to the frogs of the Iquitos region, Amazonian Peru. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.7937. ISBN   978-0-89338-047-2.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Dunn, E. R. (1949). Notes on the South American frog genus Edalorhina. American Museum of Natural History. OCLC   31839122.[ page needed ]
  6. 1 2 Nascimento, Filipe A. C.; Sá, Rafael O.; A. Garcia, Paulo C. (January 2021). "Tadpole of the Amazonia frog Edalorhina perezi (Anura: Leptodactylidae) with description of oral internal and chondrocranial morphology". Journal of Morphology. 282 (1): 115–126. doi:10.1002/jmor.21286. PMID   33078885. S2CID   225150583.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Schlüter, Andreas (January 1990). "Reproduction and Tadpole of Edalorhina perezi (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae)". Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment. 25 (1): 49–56. doi:10.1080/01650529009360801.
  8. 1 2 Lourenço, L. B.; Cardoso, A. J.; Recco-Pimentel, S. M. (2000). "Cytogenetics of Edalorhina perezi(Anura, Leptodactylidae)". Cytologia. 65 (4): 359–363. doi: 10.1508/cytologia.65.359 . S2CID   84555806.
  9. 1 2 Faivovich, Julián; Ferraro, Daiana P.; Basso, Néstor G.; Haddad, Célio F.B.; Rodrigues, Miguel T.; Wheeler, Ward C.; Lavilla, Esteban O. (October 2012). "A phylogenetic analysis of Pleurodema (Anura: Leptodactylidae: Leiuperinae) based on mitochondrial and nuclear gene sequences, with comments on the evolution of anuran foam nests". Cladistics. 28 (5): 460–482. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00406.x. PMID   34844382. S2CID   86396201.
  10. Toft, Catherine A. (April 1980). "Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a seasonal tropical environment". Oecologia. 45 (1): 131–141. doi:10.1007/BF00346717. PMID   28310947. S2CID   25257600.
  11. Murphy, Peter J. (February 2003). "Does reproductive site choice in a neotropical frog mirror variable risks facing offspring?". Ecological Monographs. 73 (1): 45–67. doi:10.1890/0012-9615(2003)073[0045:DRSCIA]2.0.CO;2.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Murphy, Peter Julian (1999). "The interplay between uncertain juvenile recruitment and reproductive strategy in the neotropical frog Edalorhina perezi". ProQuest   304506266.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  13. 1 2 3 4 Murphy, P. J. (1 September 2003). "Context-dependent reproductive site choice in a Neotropical frog". Behavioral Ecology. 14 (5): 626–633. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arg042 .