Fairness opinion

Last updated
Example Fairness Opinions

SEC filings relating to the 2009 merger of Merck & Co., Inc. and Schering-Plough Corporation:

Contents

A fairness opinion is a professional evaluation by an investment bank or other third party as to whether the terms of a merger, acquisition, buyback, spin-off, or privatization are fair. [1] It is rendered for a fee. [2] [3] They are typically issued when a public company is being sold, merged or divested of all or a substantial division of their business. They can also be required in private transactions not involving a company that is traded on a public exchange, [4] as well as in circumstances other than mergers, such as a corporation exchanging debt for equity. [5] Some of the specific functions of a fairness opinion are to aid in decision-making, mitigate risk, and enhance communication. [6]

Controversy

Controversy in financial and management circles surrounds the question of the objectivity of fairness opinions, as one aspect of the duty of care in the fairness of a transaction. A potential exists for a conflict of interest when an entity rendering an opinion may benefit from the transaction either directly or indirectly. [7] Directors and officers of the companies also may have an interest in the outcome of the proposed transaction. [8] In response, in the United States, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (then the National Association of Securities Dealers) issued its Rule 2290 to require disclosure by its members to minimize abuses; [9] this was approved in 2007 by the Securities and Exchange Commission. [10]

Equity and fairness

In the United States, in the context of stockholder lawsuits, [11] typically relating to the sale or merger of a public company, the Delaware Court of Chancery has required sufficient disclosures be made to a board of directors and shareholders to “provide a balanced, truthful account of all matters” [12] and said “When a document ventures into certain subjects, it must do so in a manner that is materially complete and unbiased by the omission of material facts.” [13] In a Memorandum Opinion in the CheckFree/Fiserv merger Chancellor Chandler underlined that the earlier In re Pure Resources Court had established the proper frame of analysis for disclosure of financial data: “[S]tockholders are entitled to a fair summary of the substantive work performed by the investment bankers upon whose advice the recommendations of their board as to how to vote on a merger or tender rely.” [14] According to the certification hypothesis fairness opinions may also serve the interest of the shareholders by mitigating informational asymmetries in corporate transactions. [15]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mergers and acquisitions</span> Type of corporate transaction

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are business transactions in which the ownership of companies, business organizations, or their operating units are transferred to or consolidated with another company or business organization. As an aspect of strategic management, M&A can allow enterprises to grow or downsize, and change the nature of their business or competitive position.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Financial audit</span> Type of audit

A financial audit is conducted to provide an opinion whether "financial statements" are stated in accordance with specified criteria. Normally, the criteria are international accounting standards, although auditors may conduct audits of financial statements prepared using the cash basis or some other basis of accounting appropriate for the organization. In providing an opinion whether financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting standards, the auditor gathers evidence to determine whether the statements contain material errors or other misstatements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Due diligence</span> Standard of care before entering into a contract with another party

Due diligence is the investigation or exercise of care that a reasonable business or person is normally expected to take before entering into an agreement or contract with another party or an act with a certain standard of care.

A reverse takeover (RTO), reverse merger, or reverse IPO is the acquisition of a public company by a private company so that the private company can bypass the lengthy and complex process of going public. Sometimes, conversely, the public company is bought by the private company through an asset swap and share issue. The transaction typically requires reorganization of capitalization of the acquiring company.

OTC Markets Group, Inc. is an American financial market providing price and liquidity information for almost 12,400 over-the-counter (OTC) securities. The group has its headquarters in New York City. OTC-traded securities are organized into three markets to inform investors of opportunities and risks: OTCQX, OTCQB and Pink.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States securities regulation</span> Law and regulations that relate to Securities

Securities regulation in the United States is the field of U.S. law that covers transactions and other dealings with securities. The term is usually understood to include both federal and state-level regulation by governmental regulatory agencies, but sometimes may also encompass listing requirements of exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange and rules of self-regulatory organizations like the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duty of loyalty</span> Duty to act in best interests

The duty of loyalty is often called the cardinal principle of fiduciary relationships, but is particularly strict in the law of trusts. In that context, the term refers to a trustee's duty to administer the trust solely in the interest of the beneficiaries, and following the terms of the trust. It generally prohibits a trustee from engaging in transactions that might involve self-dealing or even an appearance of conflict of interest. Furthermore, it requires a fiduciary to deal with transparency regarding material facts known to them in interactions with beneficiaries.

NYSE Euronext, Inc. was a transatlantic multinational financial services corporation that operated multiple securities exchanges, including the New York Stock Exchange, Euronext and NYSE Arca. NYSE merged with Archipelago Holdings on March 7, 2006, forming NYSE Group, Inc. On April 4, 2007, NYSE Group, Inc. merged with Euronext N.V. to form the first global equities exchange, with its headquarters in Lower Manhattan. The corporation was then acquired by Intercontinental Exchange, which subsequently spun off Euronext.

A special purpose acquisition company, also known as a "blank check company", is a shell corporation listed on a stock exchange with the purpose of acquiring a private company, thus making the private company public without going through the initial public offering process, which often carries significant procedural and regulatory burdens. According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), SPACs are created specifically to pool funds to finance a future merger or acquisition opportunity within a set timeframe; these opportunities usually have yet to be identified while raising funds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">International Organization of Securities Commissions</span> International financial regulatory body

The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) is an association of organizations that regulate the world's securities and futures markets. Members are typically primary securities and/or futures regulators in a national jurisdiction or the main financial regulator from each country. Its mandate is to:

TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc., 426 U.S. 438 (1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States articulated the requirement of materiality in securities fraud cases.

<i>Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.</i>

Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., 457 A.2d 701, is a case concerning United States corporate law in the context of mergers and "squeeze outs".

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) is a private American corporation that acts as a self-regulatory organization (SRO) that regulates member brokerage firms and exchange markets. FINRA is the successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) as well as to the member regulation, enforcement, and arbitration operations of the New York Stock Exchange. The U.S. government agency that acts as the ultimate regulator of the U.S. securities industry, including FINRA, is the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

In finance, a dark pool is a private forum for trading securities, derivatives, and other financial instruments. Liquidity on these markets is called dark pool liquidity. The bulk of dark pool trades represent large trades by financial institutions that are offered away from public exchanges like the New York Stock Exchange and the NASDAQ, so that such trades remain confidential and outside the purview of the general investing public. The fragmentation of electronic trading platforms has allowed dark pools to be created, and they are normally accessed through crossing networks or directly among market participants via private contractual arrangements. Generally, dark pools are not available to the public, but in some cases, they may be accessed indirectly by retail investors and traders via retail brokers.

An alternative public offering (APO) is the combination of a reverse merger with a simultaneous private investment of public equity (PIPE). It allows companies an alternative to an initial public offering (IPO) as a means of going public while raising capital.

Houlihan Smith & Company was an investment banking firm that provided financial advisory and financing services to public and private businesses. Houlihan was founded in 1996 and reorganized as Houlihan Capital in 2011.

<i>Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.</i>

Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173, was a landmark decision of the Delaware Supreme Court on hostile takeovers.

Regulation S-K is a prescribed regulation under the US Securities Act of 1933 that lays out reporting requirements for various SEC filings used by public companies. Companies are also often called issuers, filers or registrants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadian corporate law</span>

Canadian corporate law concerns the operation of corporations in Canada, which can be established under either federal or provincial authority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">European company law</span>

European company law is the part of European Union law which concerns the formation, operation and insolvency of companies in the European Union. The EU creates minimum standards for companies throughout the EU, and has its own corporate forms. All member states continue to operate separate companies acts, which are amended from time to time to comply with EU Directives and Regulations. There is, however, also the option of businesses to incorporate as a Societas Europaea (SE), which allows a company to operate across all member states.

References

  1. ""About Fairness Opinions | JPKatz", JPKatz.com". Archived from the original on 2010-12-13. Retrieved 2009-12-02.
  2. ""Definition, Fairness Opinion", Investorwords.com". Archived from the original on 2007-12-31. Retrieved 2008-01-02.
  3. Ralph Ward, "A Briefing On Fairness Opinions", Inc.com (February 2001).
  4. ""Fairness Opinion in private transactions", Blackpartners.pl". Archived from the original on 2013-12-03. Retrieved 2013-12-02.
  5. Jill R. GoodmanNew York Times Dealbook
  6. Ferro, John; Benoit, Bryan. "Raising the Bar for Fairness Opinions". Transaction Advisors. ISSN   2329-9134.
  7. Marie Leone, "Fairness Opinion Neutrality Questioned", CFO.com (February 2, 2006).
  8. Yasuhiro Ohta and Kenton K. Yee, "The Fairness Opinion Puzzle: Board Incentives, Information Asymmetry, and Bidding Strategy," Journal Of Legal Studies 37.1, pp. 229-272 (January 2008)
  9. "FINRA Rule 2290: Required Disclosures in Fairness Opinions", Cahill Gordon & Reindel, (November 6, 2007)
  10. "Fairness Opinions: SEC Approves New NASD Rule 2290 Regarding Fairness Opinions", FINRA Regulatory Notice 07-54. Effective Date: December 8, 2007. [ permanent dead link ]
  11. Steven M. Davidoff, "Fairness Opinions", American University Law Review, v. 55, p. 1557.
  12. Malone v. Brincat, 722 A.2d 5, 12 (Del. 1998)
  13. In re Pure Resources, Inc. S’holders Litig., 808 A.2d 421 (Del. Ch. 2002), pp. 447-8.
  14. In re CheckFree Corp. S’holders Litig., C.A. No. 3193-CC (Del. Ch. Oct. 18, 2007), Memorandum Opinion, Consolidated Civil Action No. 3193-CC (November 1, 2007).
  15. Pierfrancesco LaMura, Marc Steffen Rapp, Bernhard Schwetzler, Andreas Wilms, “The Certification Hypothesis of Fairness Opinions”, 2009)