Federation Council | |
|---|---|
| Type | |
| Type | Bicameral (de jure) |
| History | |
| Founded | Not convened yet |
| Preceded by | |
| Elections | |
| Redistricting | Independent High Electoral Commission |
| Constitution | |
| Constitution of Iraq (2005), Section II, Chapter I | |
| |
|---|
|
| Constitution |
The Federation Council of Iraq [a] is the unconvened de jure upper house of the bicameral legislature of Iraq. [2]
The constitution of Iraq defines the Federation Council as the upper chamber of Iraq's legislature composed of all governorates and federal regions. It also stipulates that the Federation Council is to be formed by a law passed by the Council of Representatives, but as of December 2025, no bill with two-thirds majority approval has established the upper chamber.
According to Article 65 of the Constitution:
A legislative council shall be established named the "Federation Council", to include representatives from the regions and the governorates that are not organized in a region. A law, enacted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Council of Representatives, shall regulate the formation of the Federation Council, its membership conditions, its competencies, and all that is connected with it.
The Federation Council shall consist of elected officials from Iraq's federal regions and governorates, and its authorities is to be determined by a law enacted by the Council of Representatives.
Proponents of the Federation Council (FC) have argued that:
Successive Presidents have argued that they retain the constitutional right to return a new legislation to the Parliament without ratification, but only once. In reality, the Parliament can persist with the legislation and ignore the President, except that he/she retains the ability to prevent the enactment of the new legislation by preventing its publication in the official Gazzet, Al-Waqai Al-Iraqiya
The idea behind the Federal Council is to balance population-based representation in the lower house with territorial or region-based representation in the upper house. In practice, it is meant to protect federal regions such as the Kurdistan Region and to provide a forum for settling disputes between Baghdad, regions, and provinces.
Establishing the Federation Council has been one of the least discussed issues but a serious demand of the Kurds, now some Shiite and Sunni parties similarly back it
The failure to implement the constitution was one of the main reasons used to justify the Kurdish independence referendum.
Although the Council of Representatives has been one of the most active Iraqi institutions, it has been criticized for passing laws that have sometimes further divided these conflicting sides or for failing to pass desperately needed laws that would help the country end contradicting Baghdad-Erbil interpretations of the constitution.
The Federation Council could have checked the laws passed by the lower house, and the requirement of a two-thirds majority to pass laws would have made it impossible for any political side in the Council of Representatives to impose its will over others.
Strengthening decentralization and empowering governorates and regions is in line with the constitution. Moreover, decentralization of power is essential for stability of Iraq, as local administrations can protect their areas through local police rather than militias.
In the area of political disputes and political conflicts, federalism may be very suitable for power sharing, but democratic institutions need to be present to guarantee that the regions and governorates can protect themselves from the majority when it wants to impose its will.