Fukushima disaster cleanup

Last updated

The Fukushima disaster cleanup is an ongoing attempt to limit radioactive contamination from the three nuclear reactors involved in the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster that followed the earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011. The affected reactors were adjacent to one another and accident management was made much more difficult because of the number of simultaneous hazards concentrated in a small area. Failure of emergency power following the tsunami resulted in loss of coolant from each reactor, hydrogen explosions damaging the reactor buildings, and water draining from open-air spent fuel pools. Plant workers were put in the position of trying to cope simultaneously with core meltdowns at three reactors and exposed fuel pools at three units.

Contents

Automated cooling systems were installed within 3 months from the accident. A fabric cover was built to protect the buildings from storms and heavy rainfall. New detectors were installed at the plant to track emissions of xenon gas which can be a sign of nuclear fission. Filters were installed to reduce contaminants from escaping the area of the plant into the area or atmosphere. Cement has been laid near the seabed to control contaminants from accidentally entering the ocean.

Michio Aoyama, a scientist at Fukushima University's Institute of Environmental Radioactivity, estimated that the meltdowns and explosions released 18,000 terabecquerel (TBq) of caesium 137 (equivalent to roughly 5,600 grams (200 oz)), mostly into the Pacific Ocean. He also estimated that two years after the accident, the stricken plant was still releasing 30 gigabecquerel (30 GBq, or approximately 0.8 curie equivalent to roughly 9 milligrams (0.14 gr)) of caesium 137 and the same amount (in terms of activity, not in terms of mass – the mass of 90
Sr amounts to roughly 5.8 milligrams (0.090 gr)) of strontium 90 into the ocean daily. [1] For comparison, the LD50 of Caesium-137 in mice (through acute radiation syndrome) has been reported at 245 μg/kg body weight [2] whereas experiments in the 1970s yielded a lethal dose in dogs of 44 μg/kg body weight. [3] In a 70 kilograms (150 lb) adult human, this would imply doses of 17 milligrams (0.26 gr) and 3 milligrams (0.046 gr) respectively. In September 2013, it was reported that the level of strontium-90 detected in a drainage ditch located near a water storage tank, from which around 300 tons of water was found to have leaked, was believed to have exceeded the threshold[ which? ] set by the government. [4] Efforts to control the flow of contaminated water have included trying to isolate the plant behind a 30-meter-deep, 1.5-kilometer-long "ice wall" of frozen soil, which has had limited success. [5]

Decommissioning the plant is estimated to cost tens of billions of dollars and last 30–40 years. [6] [7] Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) is going to remove the remaining nuclear fuel material from the plants. TEPCO completed the removal of 1535 fuel assemblies from the Unit 4 spent fuel pool in December 2014 and 566 fuel assemblies from the Unit 3 spent fuel pool in February 2021. [8] TEPCO plans to remove all fuel rods from the spent fuel pools of Units 1, 2, 5, and 6 by 2031 and to remove the remaining molten fuel debris from the reactor containments of Units 1, 2, and 3 by 2040 or 2050. [9]

While radioactive particles were found to have contaminated rice harvested near Fukushima City in the autumn of 2011, [10] fears of contamination in the soil have receded as government measures to protect the food supply have appeared to be successful. Studies have shown that soil contamination in most areas of Fukushima was not serious. [11] In 2018, Dr. Aoyama of Fukushima University released a report saying that contaminated water was still flowing into the Pacific Ocean, but at a diminished rate of 2 GBq per day. [12] [note 1]

Overview

At the time of the initial event, 50 TEPCO employees remained onsite in the immediate aftermath to work to stabilize the plant and begin cleanup. [13]

Initially, TEPCO did not put forward a strategy to regain control of the situation in the reactors. Helmut Hirsch, a German physicist and nuclear expert, said "they are improvising with tools that were not intended for this type of situation". [14] On 17 April 2011, however, TEPCO appeared to put forward the broad basis of a plan that included: (1) reaching "cold shutdown in about six to nine months;" (2) "restoring stable cooling to the reactors and spent fuel pools in about three months;" (3) putting "special covers" on Units 1, 3, and 4 starting in June; (4) installing "additional storage containers for the radioactive water that has been pooling in the turbine basements and outside trenches;" [15] (5) using radio-controlled equipment to clean up the site; [15] and (6) using silt fences to limit ocean contamination. [15] Previously, TEPCO publicly committed to installing new emergency generators 20 m above sea level, twice the height of the generators destroyed by the tsunami on 11 March. [16] Toshiba and Hitachi had both proposed plans for shuttering the facility. [17]

"Cold shutdown" was accomplished on 11 December 2011. From that point active cooling was no longer needed, but water injection was still required due to large water leaks. [18] [19] Long-term plans for Units 5 and 6 have not been announced, "but they too may need to be decommissioned". [20]

On 5 May 2011, workers entered reactor buildings for the first time since the accident. [21] The workers began to install air filtration systems to clean air of radioactive materials to allow additional workers to install water cooling systems. [21]

In 2017, TEPCO announced that remote-controlled robots sent into the destroyed Unit 3 reactor buildings had found the reactor's melted uranium fuel, which had burned through the floor of the reactor vessel and settled in clumps on the concrete floor below. [22]

Scope of cleanup

Japanese reactor maker Toshiba said it could decommission the earthquake-damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant in about 10 years, a third quicker than the American Three Mile Island plant. [23] As a comparison, at Three Mile Island the vessel of the partially melted core was first opened 11 years after the accident, with cleanup activities taking several more years.

TEPCO announced it restored the automated cooling systems in the damaged reactors in about three months, and had the reactors put into cold shutdown status in six months. [24]

First estimates included costs as high as ¥1 trillion (US$13 billion), as cited by the Japanese Prime Minister at the time, Yoshihiko Noda (野田 佳彦). This estimate was made before the scope of the problem was known, however. It seems that the contamination was less than feared. No strontium is detectable in the soil, [25] and though the crops of the year of the disaster were contaminated, the crops produced by the area now are safe for human consumption. [11]

In 2016, Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry estimated the total cost of dealing with the Fukushima disaster at ¥21.5 trillion (US$187 billion), almost twice the previous estimate of ¥11 trillion (US$96 billion). A rise in compensation for victims of the disaster from ¥5.4 trillion (US$47 billion) to ¥7.9 trillion (US$69 billion) was expected, with decontamination costs estimated to rise from ¥2.5 trillion (US$22 billion) to ¥4 trillion (US$35 billion), costs for interim storage of radioactive material to increase from ¥1.1 trillion (US$10 billion) to ¥1.6 trillion (US$14 billion), and costs of decommissioning reactors to increase from ¥2 trillion (US$17 billion) to ¥8 trillion (US$69 billion). [26]

Working conditions at the plant

There has been concern that the plant would be dangerous for workers. Two workers suffered skin burns from radiation, but no serious injuries or fatalities have been documented to have been caused by radiation at Fukushima Dai-ichi.

Workers in dorms exposed to radiation

Two shelters for people working at the Fukushima site were not listed as part of the radiation management zones although radiation levels in the shelters exceeded the legal limits. The consequence was that the workers did not get paid the extra "danger allowance" that was paid to workers in these "radiation management zones". The shelters were constructed by Toshiba Corporation and the Kajima Corporation at a place some 2 kilometers west of the damaged reactors, just outside the plant compound, but near reactors 1 to 4. The shelters were built after the shelters at the plant compound became overcrowded. At 7 October 2011, radiation levels were between 2 and 16 microsieverts per hour in the Toshiba building, and 2 to 8.5 in the Kajima dorm. The Industrial Safety and Health Law on the prevention of health damage through ionizing radiation had set the limit for accumulated radiation dosage in radiation management zones at 1.3 millisieverts over three months, so the maximum level is 2.6 microsieverts/hour. In both dorms, the radiation levels were higher. These doses are, however, well below the level to affect human health. According to the law, the "business operator" is responsible for "managing radiation dosage and the prevention of contamination", Toshiba and Kajima said that TEPCO was responsible, but a TEPCO official commented, "From the perspective of protecting workers from radiation, the business operators (that constructed the shelters) are managing radiation dosage and the prevention of contamination", in this way suggesting that Toshiba and Kajima were to take the care of the zone management. [27]

Preventing hydrogen explosions

On 26 September 2011, after the discovery of hydrogen in a pipe leading to the containment vessel of reactor no.1, NISA instructed TEPCO to check whether hydrogen was building up in reactor no. 2 and 3 as well. TEPCO announced that measurements of hydrogen would be taken in reactor no. 1, before any nitrogen was injected to prevent explosions. When hydrogen would be detected at the other reactors, nitrogen injections would follow. [28]

After the discovery of hydrogen concentrations between 61 and 63 percent in pipes of the containment of reactor no. 1, nitrogen injections were started on 8 October. On 10 October, TEPCO announced that the concentrations were, at that moment, low enough to prevent explosions, and even if the concentration would rise again, it would not exceed 4 percent, the lowest level that would pose the risk of an explosion. On the evening of 9 October, two holes were drilled into a pipe to install a filter for radioactive substances inside the containment vessel; this was 2 weeks behind the schedule TEPCO had set for itself. [29]

Investigations inside the reactors

On 19 January 2012, the interior of the primary containment vessel of reactor 2 was inspected with an industrial endoscope. This device, 8.5 millimeters in diameter, was equipped with a 360 degrees-view camera and a thermometer to measure the temperature and the cooling water inside, in an attempt to calibrate the existing temperature measurements that could have an error margin of 20 degrees. The device was brought in by a hole at 2.5 meters above the floor where the vessel is located. The procedure lasted 70 minutes. [30] The photos showed parts of the walls and pipes inside the containment vessel. But they were unclear and blurred, most likely due to water vapors and the radiation inside. According to TEPCO the photos showed no serious damage. The temperature measured inside was 44.7 degrees Celsius, and did not differ much from the 42.6 degrees measured outside the vessel. [31] [32]

Inspections of the suppression chambers reactor no. 2 and 3

On 14 March 2012, for the first time after the accidents, six workers were sent into the basements of reactor no. 2 and 3, to examine the suppression chambers. Behind the door of the suppression chamber in the no. 2 reactor building, 160 millisieverts/hour was measured. The door to the suppression chamber in the no. 3 reactor building was damaged and could not be opened. In front of this door, the radiation level measurement was 75 millisieverts/hour. For reactors to be decommissioned, access to the suppression chambers is vital for conducting repairs to the containment structures. According to TEPCO, this work should be done with robots, because these places with high levels of radiation could be hostile to humans. TEPCO released some video footage of the work at the suppression chambers of the No. 2 and 3 reactors. [33] [34]

On 26 and 27 March 2012, the inside of the containment vessel of reactor 2 was inspected with a 20 meter long endoscope. With this, a dosimeter was brought into the vessel to measure the radiation levels inside. At the bottom of the primary containment structure, 60 centimeters of water was found, instead of the 3 meters expected. The radiation level measured was 72.9 sieverts per hour. Because of this, the endoscope could only function for a few hours. For reactors number 1 and 3, no endoscopic survey was planned at that time, because the actual radiation levels were too high for humans. [33] [ dead link ] [34] [35]

Management of contaminated water

Continued cooling of the melted reactor cores is required in order to remove excess heat. Due to damage to the integrity of the reactor vessels, radioactive water accumulates inside the reactor and turbine buildings. To decontaminate the contaminated water, TEPCO installed radioaction water treatment systems. [36]

The Japanese government had initially requested the assistance of the Russian floating water decontamination plant Landysh to process the radioactive water from the damaged reactors, but negotiations with the Russian government were an extremely slow process and it is unclear if the plant was ever sent to Fukushima. Landysh was built by Russia with funding from Japan to process liquid wastes produced during the decommissioning of nuclear submarines. [37]

As of early September 2011, the operating rate of the filtering system exceeded the target of 90 percent for the first time. 85,000 tons of water were decontaminated by 11 September, with over 100,000 tons of waste water remaining to be treated at the time. The nuclear waste generated by the filters had already filled almost 70 percent of the 800 cubic meters of storage space available at the time. TEPCO had to figure out how to cool the reactors with less than 15 tons of water per day in order to reduce the growth of waste water and nuclear waste to more manageable levels. [38]

Installation of circulating water cooling system

Side view of the Fukushima trenches and tunnels. 1: Reactor building, 2: Turbine generator and associated condenser (large black colored vessel). Fukushima I nuclear accident diagram 1.svg
Side view of the Fukushima trenches and tunnels. 1: Reactor building, 2: Turbine generator and associated condenser (large black colored vessel).

In order to remove decay heat of the severely damaged cores of Units 1–3, TEPCO injected cooling water into the reactors. As the reactors appear to have holes around the bottom, the water dissolved the water-soluble fission products, which then accumulated in the basement of the turbine building (see the adjacent diagram) through any leaks from the water-injected reactor buildings. Since the accumulated radioactive water was a risk, TEPCO tried to transfer it.

Assembly of hose fittings for Fukushima complex, Yokota AB Construction of internationally compatible emergency pump valves for Fukushima complex.jpg
Assembly of hose fittings for Fukushima complex, Yokota AB

As the accumulated water in the basement of the turbine building of Units 2 and 3 was radioactive, TEPCO needed to remove it. They had initially planned to pump the water to the condenser (see diagram). [39] [40] TEPCO abandoned that plan after discovering the condensers on both units were already full of water. [41] Pumps capable of processing 10–25 tons of water per hour were used to transfer condenser water into other storage tanks, freeing up condenser storage for the water in the basements. Since both the storage tanks and the condensers were nearly full, TEPCO also considered using floating tanker ships as a temporary storage location for the radioactive water. [42] [43] Regardless of the availability of offshore storage for radioactive-contaminated water, TEPCO discharged 11,500 tons of its least contaminated water (which was still approximately 100 times the legal limit for radioactivity) into the sea on 5 April in order to free up storage space. [44] [45] [46] At the same time, on 5 April, TEPCO began pumping water from the condensers of units 1–3 to their respective condensation storage tanks to free room for the trench water (see below). [46]

Route of leakage of radioactive water of the Fukushima plant through a gravel layer. 1: Reactor building, 2: Turbine building, 3: Injection of sodium silicate. Fukushima I nuclear powerplant nuclear (leak case of high-level radiation water, trenches and tunnels).PNG
Route of leakage of radioactive water of the Fukushima plant through a gravel layer.
1: Reactor building, 2: Turbine building, 3: Injection of sodium silicate.

Removal of accumulated water in seawater piping trench

The Fukushima Daiichi NPS has several seawater piping trenches that were originally designed to house pipes and cables running from the Units 2–4 turbine buildings to their seaside, which do not directly connect to the sea. Inside the trench, radioactive contaminated water has been accumulating since the accident. Due to the risk of soil or ocean contamination from these trenches, TEPCO has been trying to remove the accumulated water in the trenches by pumping it back into the turbine buildings, as well as backfilling the trenches to reduce or prevent further incursion of contaminated water. [47]

Groundwater contamination

On 5 July 2013, TEPCO found 9 kBq/L of 134Cs and 18 kBq/L of 137Cs in a sample taken from a monitoring well close to the coastline. Compared with samples taken three days earlier, the levels were 90 times higher. The cause was unknown. The monitoring well is situated close to another monitoring well that had previously leaked radioactive water into the sea in April 2011. A sample of groundwater from another well situated about 100 meters south of the first well showed that the radioactivity had risen by 18 times over the course of 4 days, with 1.7 kBq/L of strontium and other radioactive substances. [48] A day later the readings in the first well were 11 kBq/L of 134Cs and 22 kBq/L of 137Cs, 111 times and 105 times greater than the samples of 5 July. TEPCO did not know the reasons for the higher readings, but the monitoring was to be intensified. [49]

More than a month after the groundwater contamination was discovered, TEPCO started to contain the radioactive groundwater. They assumed that the radioactivity had escaped early in the beginning of the disaster in 2011, but NRA experts[ who? ] had serious doubts about their assumption. According to them, other sources could not be excluded. Numerous pipes were running everywhere on the reactor grounds to cool the reactors and decontaminate the water used, and leaks could be anywhere. TEPCO's solution resulted in redirection of the groundwater flows, which could have spread the radioactive contamination further. TEPCO also had plans for pumping groundwater.[ further explanation needed ] At that time the turbine buildings of units 2 and 3 contained 5000 and 6000 cubic meters of radioactive water respectively. With wells in contact with the turbine buildings, this could spread the radioactivity into the ground. The NRA announced that it would form a task force to find the leaks and to block the flow of the groundwater to the coastline, because the NRA suspected that the groundwater was leaking into the sea. [50] [51] [52]

Timeline of contaminated water treatment

2011
On 27 March
TEPCO announced that radioactive water had accumulated in the basement of the Unit 2 turbine building. [53]
On 28 March
The Japanese Nuclear Safety Commission advised TEPCO to take all possible measures to avoid the accumulated water in the Unit 2 turbine building leaking into the ground and the sea [54] (hereinafter called "the JNSC advice").
On 2 April
TEPCO announced the outflow of fluid containing radioactive materials to the ocean from areas near the intake channel of Unit 2. [55] The fluid source was a 20 cm crack on the concrete lateral of the pit that appeared to have been created by the earthquake. TEPCO attempted to inject fresh concrete, polymeric water absorbent, sawdust, and shredded newspapers into the crack; this approach failed to slow the leak. After an investigation of the water flow, TEPCO began to inject sodium silicate on 5 April, and the outflow was stopped on 6 April. [56] The total amount and radioactivity of the outflow from the crack was estimated to be approximately 520 m3 and approximately 4.7 PBq respectively. [57]
On 17 April
TEPCO announced the Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. [58]
On 27 April
In order to prevent the outflow of the highly radioactive water at the turbine building of Unit 2, the water was transferred to the Centralized Radiation Waste Treatment Facility since 19 April. TEPCO planned to install facilities for processing the stored water and reusing treated water to inject it into the reactors. [59]
On 11 May
TEPCO investigated possible leakage of radioactive water to the outside from around the intake canal of Unit 3 in response to employees' report of water flowing into the pit via power cable pipe lines. [60]
On 23 May
Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency began to use the term "Contaminated Water" as the water with high concentration of radioactive materials. [61]
On 17 June
TEPCO began the operation of the cesium adsorption apparatus (Kurion) and the decontamination apparatus (AREVA). [62]
On 17 August
TEPCO began the (test) operation of SARRY, which is the second cesium adsorption apparatus (TOSHIBA). [63]
On 28 August
2 TEPCO workers at the plant were exposed to radiation by mistake while they were replacing parts of the contaminated water processing system. The next Wednesday, 31 August, two other workers were sprayed with highly contaminated water when the water splashed from a container with a leaking valve that did not close. It was found that they were exposed to 0.16 and 0.14 millisieverts. The last man wore a raincoat. No immediate symptoms were found. [64]
On 21 December
TEPCO announced Mid-and-long-Term Roadmap towards the Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Units 1–4. [65]
2012
On 5 April
A leaking pipe was found at 1.00 AM. The leakage stopped an hour after the valves were closed. 12,000 liters of water with high levels of radioactive strontium were lost. According to TEPCO, much of this water escaped through a nearby sewer system into the ocean. Investigations were expected to reveal how much water was lost into the ocean, and how the joint could fail. A similar leakage at the same facility happened on 26 March 2012. [66]
On 19 September
Nuclear Regulation Authority (NRA) was established. [67]
2013
On 30 March
TEPCO began the operation of ALPS, which is the multi-nuclide removal equipment. [68]
On 22 July [69]
With announcing the situation on seawater and groundwater, [70] TEPCO admitted that contaminated groundwater had been leaking into the ocean since March 2011. [71]
On 27 July
TEPCO announced that extremely high levels of tritium and cesium were found in a pit containing about 5000 cubic meters of water on the sea side of the Unit 2 reactor building. 8.7 MBq/liter of tritium and 2.35 GBq/liter of cesium was measured. The NRA was concerned that leaks from the pit could release high tritium levels into the sea and that there was still water flowing from the reactor into the turbine building and into the pit. TEPCO believed that this pollution was there from the first days in 2011, and had stayed there. Nevertheless, TEPCO would control the site for leaks, and seal the soil around the pit. [72]
On 30 May
The Government of Japan decided on a policy to prevent the groundwater flowing in the reactor buildings. [73] A frozen soil wall (Land-side of Impermeable Wall) was scheduled for introduction to block the flow of groundwater and prevent its mixing with contaminated water. [74]
On 19 August
Contaminated water leakage from a flange type tank was found in the H4 area. [75] The incident was evaluated by the NRA as a provisional rating Level 3 on the eight-level INES. [76] In response to this incident, the NRA recommended that TEPCO should replace the flange type tank, which was prone to leak water, with a welded type tank. [77]
On 28 August
A subcontractor employee was contaminated on his face, head and chest while transferring water from the damaged tank. After decontamination, 5,000 cpm were still measured on his head; the readings from prior to decontamination were not released. The man was released, but ordered to have a whole-body radiation count later. [78] [79]
On 2 September
It was reported that radiation near another tank was measured at 1.8 Sv/h, 18 times higher than previously thought. TEPCO had initially recorded radiation at about 100 mSv/h, but later admitted that that was because the equipment they were using could only read measurements up to that level. The latest reading came from a more advanced device capable of measuring higher levels. The buildup of water at the site was reported to be close to becoming unmanageable and experts said that TEPCO will soon be left with no choice but to release the water into the ocean or evaporate it. [6]
On 3 September
The Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters published "the Government's Decision on Addressing the Contaminated Water Issue at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi NPS". [80]
On 12 September
Contaminated water leakage from storage tanks was found in the H4 area. [81]

Suggestions of dumping cooling water

In September 2019, the contaminated cooling water had almost reached storage capacity. Japan's environment minister Yoshiaki Harada suggested, that there was only one recourse: "release it into the ocean and dilute it... there are no other options." [82] A day later, Yoshiaki Harada was taken out of his function, after protests. His successor Shinjiro Koizumi apologized to the fishermen in Fukushima at a meeting in Iwaki City. The new minister promised to take a strong view of the facts, and to push for reconstruction. [83]

In 2020, the storage of contaminated water reached over a million tons, stored in large containers at the grounds of the plant. [84] It was predicted that in 2022, the storage capacity could be exceeded. Therefore, a proposal was made in spring 2020, to start discharging the cooling water into the ocean. Hiroshi Kishi, the president of JF Zengyoren, the headman of many fishermen cooperatives, strongly opposed this proposal at a meeting with Japanese government representatives. According to Kishi, any release of cooling water could prompt other countries to reinforce restrictions on imports of Japanese fishery products, reversing a recent trend toward easing.

Radioactive waste

Cooling the reactors with recirculated and decontaminated water from the basements proved successful, but as a consequence, this radioactive waste was accumulating in the temporary storage facility at the plant. TEPCO decided in the first week of October to use the "Sally" decontamination system built by Toshiba Corporation and keep the Kurion/Areva system as backup.

On 27 September, after three months operation, some 4,700 drums with radioactive waste had accumulated at the plant. The Kurion and Sally systems both used zeolites to concentrate cesium. After the zeolite was saturated, the vessels with the zeolite were designated as nuclear waste. By now, 210 Kurion-made vessels with a total of 307 cubic meters, each vessel measuring 0.9 meters in diameter and 2.3 meters in height had accumulated at the plant. The Areva-filters used sand to absorb radioactive materials and chemicals were used to reactivate the filters. In this way, 581 cubic meters of highly contaminated sludge were produced.

According to Professor Akio Koyama of the Kyoto University Research Reactor Institute, the density of high-level decontaminated water was believed to contain 10 gigabecquerel per liter, but if this is condensed to polluted sludge and zeolites, this density could increase 10,000 fold. These densities could not be dealt with using conventional systems. [85]

Spent fuel pools

On 16 August 2011, TEPCO announced the installation of desalination equipment in the spent fuel pools of reactor 2, 3, and 4. These pools had been cooled with seawater for some time, and TEPCO feared the salt would corrode the stainless steel pipes and pool wall liners. The Unit 4 spent fuel pool was the first to have the equipment installed. The spent fuel pools of reactor 2 and 3 came next. TEPCO expected to achieve removal of 96% of the salt in the spent fuel pools within two months. [86]

Unit 4 spent fuel removal

On 22 December 2014, TEPCO crews completed the removal of all fuel assemblies from the spent fuel pool of reactor 4. 1331 spent fuel assemblies were moved to the ground-level common spent fuel pool, and 204 unused fuel assemblies were moved to the spent fuel pool of reactor 6 (Unit 4 was out of service for refueling at the time of the 2011 accident, so the spent fuel pool contained a number of unused new fuel assemblies). [87]

Unit 3 spent fuel removal

On 15 April 2019, began the process of removing the fuel assemblies from the pool of Unit 3. On 28 February 2021, the removal of all spent fuel from the fuel pool of reactor 3 was completed. On the top of the roof of the reactor a fuel handling machine crane had been built, which has been used to remove 566 fuel assemblies from the pool.

Unit 2 spent fuel removal

615 fuel assemblies lay in the spent fuel pool. Removal operations have yet to begin; operations may start in the fiscal year of 2024 and end in the fiscal year 2026.

Unit 1 spent fuel removal

392 fuel assemblies lay in the spent fuel pool. Removal operations have yet to begin. The operations may start in 2027.

Debris removal

On 10 April 2011, TEPCO began using remote-controlled, unmanned heavy equipment to remove debris from around reactors 1–4. The debris and rubble, caused by hydrogen explosions at reactors 1 and 3, was impeding recovery operations both by being in the way and emitting high radioactivity. The debris will be placed into containers and kept at the plant. [88]

Proposed building protections

Because the monsoon season begins in June in Japan, it became urgent to protect the damaged reactor buildings from storms, typhoons, and heavy rainfall. As a short-term solution, TEPCO envisaged to apply a light cover on the remaining structures above the damaged reactors. As of mid-June 2011, TEPCO released its plan to use automated cranes to move structures into place over the reactor. This strategy is an attempt to keep as many people away from the reactors as possible, while still covering the damaged reactors. [89]

Proposed sarcophagus

On 18 March 2011, Reuters reported [90] that Hidehiko Nishiyama, Japan's nuclear agency spokesman when asked about burying the reactors in sand and concrete, said: "That solution is in the back of our minds, but we are focused on cooling the reactors down." Considered a last-ditch effort since it would not provide cooling, such a plan would require massive reinforcement under the floor, as in the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant sarcophagus. [91]

Scrapping reactors Daiichi 1–4

On 7 September 2011, TEPCO president Toshio Nishizawa said that the 4 damaged reactors will be scrapped. This announcement came at a session of the Fukushima Prefectural Assembly, which was investigating the accident at the plant. Whether the six other remaining reactors (Daiichi 5, 6, Daini 1, 2, 3, 4) should be abolished too would be decided based on the opinions of local municipalities. [92]

On 28 October 2011, the Japanese Atomic Energy Commission presented a timetable in a draft report, titled "how to scrap the Fukushima reactors". It stated that within 10 years, a start should be made with the retrieval of the melted fuel within the reactors. First, the containment vessels of reactors 1, 2 and 3 should be repaired to prevent radiation releases, then all should be filled with water. Decommissioning would take more than 30 years, because the pressure vessels of the reactor vessels are damaged. After the accident at Three Mile Island in 1979, some 70 percent of the fuel rods had melted. There, the retrieval of the fuel was started in 1985, and completed in 1990. The work at Fukushima was expected to take significantly longer because of the far greater damage and the fact that 4 reactors would need to be decommissioned all at the same time. [93] [94]

After discussions were started in August 2011, on 9 November 2011, a panel of experts of Japan's Atomic Energy Commission completed a schedule for scrapping the damaged reactors. The panel's conclusions were:

This scheme was partly based on the experience gained from the 1979 Three Mile Island accident. In Fukushima, however, with three meltdowns at one site, the damage was much more extensive. It could take 30 years or more to remove the nuclear fuel, dismantle the reactors, and remove all the buildings. Research institutions all over the world were asked to participate in the construction of a research site to examine the removal of fuel and other nuclear wastes. The official publication of the report was planned for the end of 2011. [95] [96]

Protection systems installed

Since the disaster, TEPCO has installed sensors, a fabric cover over the reactors and additional filters to reduce the emission of contaminants.

Sensors for xenon and temperature changes to detect critical reactions

After the detection of radioactive xenon gas in the containment vessel of the No. 2 reactor on 1 and 2 November 2011, TEPCO was not able to determine whether this was a sustained fission process or only spontaneous fission. Therefore, TEPCO installed detection devices for radioactive xenon to single out any occurrence of nuclear criticality. Next to this TEPCO installed temperature sensors to detect temperature changes in the reactors, another indicator of possible critical fission reactions. [95] [97]

New filters

On 20 September 2011, the Japanese government and TEPCO announced the installation of new filters to reduce the amount of radioactive substances released into the air. In the last week of September 2011 these filters were to be installed at reactors 1, 2 and 3. Gases out of the reactors would be decontaminated before they would be released into the air. By mid October, the construction of the polyester shield over the No.1 reactor should be completed. In the first half of September, the amount of radioactive substances released from the plant was about 200 megabecquerel per hour, according to TEPCO, that was about one four-millionths of the level of the initial stages of the accident in March 2011. [98]

Fabric cover over Unit 1

An effort has been undertaken to fit the three damaged reactor buildings with fabric covers and filters to limit radioactive contamination release. [99] On 6 April 2011, sources told Kyodo News that a major construction firm was studying the idea, and that construction wouldn't "start until June". The plan had been criticized for potentially having "limited effects in blocking the release of radioactive substances into the environment". [100] On 14 May 2011, TEPCO announced that it had begun to clear debris to create a space to install a cover over the building of reactor 1. [101] By 13 October 2011, the roof had been completed. [98] [102]

Metal cover over Unit 3

In June 2016, preparation work began to install a metal cover over the Unit 3 reactor building. In conjunction with this, a crane was to be installed to assist with the removal of the fuel rods from the storage pool. After inspection and cleaning, the removed fuel is expected to be stored in the site's communal storage facility. [103] By February 2018 the dome-shaped roof had been completed in preparation of the removal of the fuel rods. [104]

Cleanup of neighboring areas

Significant efforts are being taken to clean up radioactive material that escaped the plant. This effort combines washing down buildings and scraping away topsoil. It has been hampered by the volume of material to be removed and the lack of adequate storage facilities. [105]

There is also a concern that washing surfaces will merely move the radioactive material without eliminating it. [106]

After an earlier decontamination plan to clean all areas with radiation levels above 5 millisievert per year had raised protests, the Japanese government revealed on 10 October 2011, in a meeting with experts, a revised decontamination plan. This plan included:

On 19 December 2011, the Japanese Ministry of Environment published more details about these plans for decontamination: the work would be subsidized in 102 villages and towns. Opposition against the plan came from cattle farmers in the prefecture Iwate and the tourist industry in the city of Aizuwakamatsu, because of fears that cattle sales might drop or tourism would be hurt, when the areas would be labeled to be contaminated. Areas with lower readings complained that their decontamination would not be funded. [108]

In a Reuters story from August 2013, it was noted "[m]any have given up hope of ever returning to live in the shadow of the Fukushima nuclear plant. A survey in June showed that a third of the former residents of Iitate, a lush village famed for its fresh produce before the disaster, never want to move back. Half of those said they would prefer to be compensated enough to move elsewhere in Japan to farm." In addition, despite being allowed to return home, some residents say the lack of an economy continues to make the area de facto unlivable. [109] Compensation payments to those who have been evacuated are stopped when they are allowed to return home, but as of August 2013, decontamination of the area has progressed more slowly than expected. [110] There have also been revelations of additional leaks (see above: storage tanks leaking contaminated water).

Cementing the seabed near the water intake

On 22 February 2012, TEPCO started cementing the seabed near the plant to prevent the spread of radioactive materials into the sea. Some 70,000 square meters of seabed around the intake of cooling water would be covered with 60 centimeters thick cement. The work was expected to take 4 months time, and prevent the spread of contaminated mud and sand for at least 50 years. [111]

New definition of the no-entry zones introduced

On 18 December 2011, Fukushima Governor, Yuhei Sato and representatives of 11 other municipal governments near the plant, were notified at a meeting at the city of Fukushima that the three ministers in charge of handling the crises, Yokio Edano, minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, Goshi Hosono, nuclear disaster minister, and Tatsuo Hirano, minister in charge of reconstruction of the government planned to redesign the classification of the no-entry zones around the Fukushima nuclear plant. From 1 April 2012, a three level system would be introduced, by the Japanese government:

no-entry zones, with an annual radiation exposure of 50 millisieverts or more
at these places habitation would be prohibited
zones with annual radiation exposures between 20 and 50 millisieverts
here former residents could return, but with restrictions
zones with exposures of less than 20 millisieverts per year
in these zones the residents would be allowed to return to their houses

Decontamination efforts were planned in line with this order, to help people return to places where the radiation levels would be relatively low. [112]

Costs of the cleanup operations

In mid December 2011, the local authorities in Fukushima had spent around 1.7 billion yen ($21 million) on the costs of decontamination works in the cities of Fukushima and Date and the village of Kawauchi. The total cleanup costs were estimated to be between 50.5 and 71 trillion yen ($470 to $660 billion). [113] For the cleanup, only 184.3 billion yen was reserved in the September supplementary budget of prefecture Fukushima, and some funds in the central government's third supplementary budget of 2011. Whenever needed, the central government would be asked for extra funding. [114]

In 2016, University of Oxford researcher and author Peter Wynn Kirby wrote that the government had allocated the equivalent of US$15 billion for the regional cleanup and described the josen (decontamination) process, with "provisional storage areas (kari-kari-okiba) ... [and] more secure, though still temporary, storage depots (kari-okiba)". Kirby opined that the effort would be better called "transcontamination" because it was moving the contaminated material around without long-term safe storage planned or executed. He also saw little progress on handling the more intense radiation waste of the destroyed power plant site itself; or on handling the larger issue of the national nuclear program's waste, particularly given the earthquake-risk of Japan relative to secure long-term storage. [115]

Lessons learned to date

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster revealed the dangers of building multiple nuclear reactor units close to one another. This proximity triggered the parallel, chain-reaction accidents that led to hydrogen explosions blowing the roofs off reactor buildings and water evaporating from open-air spent fuel pools—a situation that was potentially more dangerous than the loss of reactor cooling itself. Because of the proximity of the reactors, Plant Director Masao Yoshida "was put in the position of trying to cope simultaneously with core meltdowns at three reactors and exposed fuel pools at three units". [116]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Note: this probably means two billion disintegrations per day, and is thus 23 kBq (disintegrations per second) over the whole daily effluent volume of about 200 tons per day.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tokyo Electric Power Company</span> Japanese electric utility holding company

Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Incorporated is a Japanese electric utility holding company servicing Japan's Kantō region, Yamanashi Prefecture, and the eastern portion of Shizuoka Prefecture. This area includes Tokyo. Its headquarters are located in Uchisaiwaicho, Chiyoda, Tokyo, and international branch offices exist in Washington, D.C., and London. It is a founding member of strategic consortiums related to energy innovation and research; such as JINED, INCJ and MAI.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant</span> Disabled nuclear power plant in Japan

The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant is a disabled nuclear power plant located on a 3.5-square-kilometre (860-acre) site in the towns of Ōkuma and Futaba in Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. The plant suffered major damage from the magnitude 9.1 earthquake and tsunami that hit Japan on March 11, 2011. The chain of events caused radiation leaks and permanently damaged several of its reactors, making them impossible to restart. The working reactors were not restarted after the events.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Japan

The Fukushima Daini Nuclear Power Plant Genshiryoku Hatsudensho, Fukushima II NPP, 2F) is a nuclear power plant located on a 150 ha (370-acre) site in the town of Naraha and Tomioka in the Futaba District of Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. The Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) runs the plant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Niigata Prefecture, Japan

The Kashiwazaki-Kariwa Nuclear Power Plant is a large, modern nuclear power plant on a 4.2-square-kilometer (1,000-acre) site. The campus spans the towns of Kashiwazaki and Kariwa in Niigata Prefecture, Japan, on the coast of the Sea of Japan, where it gets cooling water. The plant is owned and operated by Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), and it is the largest nuclear generating station in the world by net electrical power rating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima nuclear accident</span> 2011 nuclear disaster in Japan

The Fukushima nuclear accident was a major nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Ōkuma, Fukushima, Japan which began on March 11, 2011. The proximate cause of the accident was the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, which resulted in electrical grid failure and damaged nearly all of the power plant's backup energy sources. The subsequent inability to sufficiently cool reactors after shutdown compromised containment and resulted in the release of radioactive contaminants into the surrounding environment. The accident was rated seven on the INES by NISA, following a report by the JNES. It is regarded as the worst nuclear incident since the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, which was also rated a seven on the INES.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timeline of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster</span> Chronology of events following the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster

Fukushima Daiichi is a multi-reactor nuclear power site in the Fukushima Prefecture of Japan. A nuclear disaster occurred there after a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and subsequent tsunami on 11 March 2011. The earthquake triggered a scram shut down of the three active reactors, and the ensuing tsunami crippled the site, stopped the backup diesel generators, and caused a station blackout. The subsequent lack of cooling led to explosions and meltdowns, with problems at three of the six reactors and in one of the six spent-fuel pools.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima 50</span> Staff operating at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant during the tsunami and meltdowns

Fukushima 50 is a pseudonym given by English-language media to a group of employees at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Following the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011, a related series of nuclear accidents resulted in melting of the cores of three reactors. These 50 employees remained on-site after 750 other workers were evacuated.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster</span> Effects of radiation released from the Fukushima nuclear disaster

The radiation effects from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are the observed and predicted effects as a result of the release of radioactive isotopes from the Fukushima Daiichii Nuclear Power Plant following the 2011 Tōhoku 9.0 magnitude earthquake and tsunami. The release of radioactive isotopes from reactor containment vessels was a result of venting in order to reduce gaseous pressure, and the discharge of coolant water into the sea. This resulted in Japanese authorities implementing a 30-km exclusion zone around the power plant and the continued displacement of approximately 156,000 people as of early 2013. The number of evacuees has declined to 49,492 as of March 2018. Radioactive particles from the incident, including iodine-131 and caesium-134/137, have since been detected at atmospheric radionuclide sampling stations around the world, including in California and the Pacific Ocean.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Japanese reaction to Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster</span> Japanese reaction to the Fukushima nuclear disaster

The Japanese reaction occurred after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, following the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. A nuclear emergency was declared by the government of Japan on 11 March. Later Prime Minister Naoto Kan issued instructions that people within a 20 km (12 mi) zone around the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant must leave, and urged that those living between 20 km and 30 km from the site to stay indoors. The latter groups were also urged to evacuate on 25 March.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents</span> Comparison between the Chernobyl disaster and Fukushima nuclear disaster

To date, the nuclear accidents at the Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima Daiichi (2011) nuclear power plants, are the only INES level 7 nuclear accidents.

When the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster began on 11 March 2011, reactor unit 4, 5 and 6 were all shut down. An explosion damaged unit 4 four days after the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. Damages from the earthquake and tsunami on unit 5 and 6 are relatively minor.

From 1946 through 1993, thirteen countries used ocean disposal or ocean dumping as a method to dispose of nuclear/radioactive waste with an approximation of 200,000 tons sourcing mainly from the medical, research and nuclear industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 2 Reactor)</span> One of the reactors involved in the Fukushima nuclear accident

The Fukushima Daiichi reactor, was 1 out of 4 reactors seriously affected during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on 11 March 2011. Overall, the plant had 6 separate boiling water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE), and maintained by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). At the time of the earthquake, Reactor 4 had been de-fueled while 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 1 Reactor)</span> One of the reactors involved in the Fukushima nuclear accident

The Fukushima Daiichi reactor, was 1 out of 4 reactors seriously affected during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on 11 March 2011. Overall, the plant had 6 separate boiling water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE), and maintained by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). At the time of the earthquake, Reactor 4 had been de-fueled while 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance. Unit 1 was immediately shut down automatically after the earthquake, and emergency generators came online to control electronics and coolant systems. However, the tsunami following the earthquake quickly flooded the low-lying rooms in which the emergency generators were housed. The flooded generators failed, cutting power to the critical pumps that must continuously circulate coolant water through the reactor core. While the government tried pumping fresh water into the core, it was already too late due to overheat. In the hours and days that followed, Unit 1 experienced a full meltdown.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster (Unit 3 Reactor)</span> One of the reactors involved in the Fukushima nuclear accident

The Fukushima Daiichi reactor, was 1 out of 4 reactors seriously affected during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on 11 March 2011. Overall, the plant had 6 separate boiling water reactors originally designed by General Electric (GE), and maintained by the Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO). In the aftermath, Unit 3 experienced hydrogen gas explosions and suffered a partial meltdown, along with the other two reactors in operation at the time the tsunami struck. Reactor 4 had been de-fueled while 5 and 6 were in cold shutdown for planned maintenance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster casualties</span> Possible casualties and related deaths caused by the Fukushima nuclear disaster

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident genshiryoku hatsudensho jiko) was a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns, and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, following the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011. It was the largest nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl disaster of 1986, and the radiation released exceeded official safety guidelines. Despite this, there were no deaths caused by acute radiation syndrome. Given the uncertain health effects of low-dose radiation, cancer deaths cannot be ruled out. However, studies by the World Health Organization and Tokyo University have shown that no discernible increase in the rate of cancer deaths is expected. Predicted future cancer deaths due to accumulated radiation exposures in the population living near Fukushima have ranged in the academic literature from none to hundreds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Investigations into the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster</span>

Investigations into the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster (or Accident) began on 11 March 2011 when a series of equipment failures, core melt and down, and releases of radioactive materials occurred at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station from the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku Earthquake and tsunami on the same day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Accident rating of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster</span> INES rating of the Fukushima nuclear disaster

The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster genshiryoku hatsudensho jiko) was a series of equipment failures, nuclear meltdowns, and releases of radioactive materials at the Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant, following the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami on 11 March 2011. It is the largest nuclear disaster since the Chernobyl disaster of 1986.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear labor issues</span> Radiation workers health and labor issues

Nuclear labor issues exist within the international nuclear power industry and the nuclear weapons production sector worldwide, impacting upon the lives and health of laborers, itinerant workers and their families.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discharge of radioactive water of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant</span> Radioactive water from a 2011 nuclear accident in Japan

Radioactive water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan began being discharged into the Pacific Ocean on 11 March 2011, following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster triggered by the Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami. Three of the plant's reactors experienced meltdowns, leaving behind melted fuel debris. Water was introduced to prevent the meltdowns from progressing further. When cooling water, groundwater, and rain came into contact with the melted fuel debris, they became contaminated with radioactive nuclides, such as iodine-131, caesium-134, caesium-137, and strontium-90.

References

  1. ↑ Fackler, Martin; Tabuchi, Hiroko (24 October 2013). "With a Plant's Tainted Water Still Flowing, No End to Environmental Fears" . The New York Times . Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  2. ↑ Moskalev, Yu. I. (1961). "Biological Effects of Cesium-137". In Lebedinskiĭ, A. V.; Moskalev, Yu. I. (eds.). Distribution, Biological Effects, and Migration of Radioactive Isotopes. Translation Series. United States Atomic Energy Commission (published April 1974). p. 220. AEC-tr-7512.
  3. ↑ Redman, H. C.; et al. (1972). "Toxicity of 137-CsCl in the Beagle. Early Biological Effects". Radiation Research . 50 (3): 629–648. Bibcode:1972RadR...50..629R. doi:10.2307/3573559. JSTOR   3573559. PMID   5030090.
  4. ↑ "Toxic water may have leaked into Pacific Ocean: TEPCO". Mainichi Shimbun . 13 September 2013. Archived from the original on 12 December 2013.
  5. ↑ Fackler, Martin (29 August 2016). "Japan's $320 Million Gamble at Fukushima: An Underground Ice Wall" . The New York Times . Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  6. 1 2 McCurry, Justin (1 September 2013). "Fukushima radiation levels 18 times higher than previously thought". The Guardian .
  7. ↑ McCurry, Justin (13 July 2014). "Doubts over ice wall to keep Fukushima safe from damaged nuclear reactors". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 July 2014.
  8. ↑ "Status of Fuel Removal from Spent Fuel Pools". TEPCO. Archived from the original on 11 August 2022. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  9. ↑ 廃炉に向けたロードマップ (in Japanese). TEPCO. Archived from the original on 22 July 2022. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
  10. ↑ McCurry, Justin (18 November 2011). "Fukushima Rice Banned by Japan". The Guardian . Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  11. 1 2 Kaplan, Karen (12 July 2011). "Japanese soil still safe for planting after Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster, scientists report – Los Angeles Times". Articles.latimes.com. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
  12. ↑ "Seven Years Later, Radioactive Water at Fukushima Plant Still Flowing into Ocean, Study Finds". The Japan Times . 29 March 2018. Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  13. ↑ McNeill, David (2 March 2013). "'I am one of the Fukushima fifty': One of the men who risked their lives to prevent a catastrophe shares his story". The Independent . London, England. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  14. ↑ Hackenbroch, Veronika; Meyer, Cordula; Thielke, Thilo (5 April 2011). "A hapless Fukushima cleanup effort". Der Spiegel.
  15. 1 2 3 Boyd, John (18 April 2011). "TEPCO Announces a "Roadmap to Restoration" at Fukushima Dai-1". IEEE Spectrum .
  16. ↑ Clenfield, Jason (14 April 2011). "Tepco's Plan Said to Extend Nuclear-Leak Risk Through June" . Bloomberg.com .
  17. ↑ "Japan Plant Emits More Radiation After Cooling Lapse". Global Security Newswire. Nuclear Threat Initiative. 14 April 2011. Archived from the original on 15 June 2019.
  18. ↑ Brumfiel, Geoff (11 December 2011). "Fukushima reaches cold shutdown". Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature.2011.9674 . S2CID   128676664 . Retrieved 10 April 2013.
  19. ↑ "After Nuclear Milestone, a Long Road". Asia Times. Retrieved 10 April 2013.
  20. ↑ Tabuchi, Hiroko (14 April 2011). "Nuclear Cleanup Plans Hinge on Unknowns". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  21. 1 2 "Fukushima workers enter nuclear reactor building". BBC News. 5 May 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  22. ↑ Fackler, Martin (19 November 2017). "Six Years After Fukushima, Robots Finally Find Reactors' Melted Uranium Fuel". The New York Times . Retrieved 2 August 2019.
  23. ↑ "Japan: Minister in first tour of stricken nuclear plant". BBC News. 9 April 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  24. ↑ Kyodo News, "Reactor shutdowns nine months away", Japan Times, 18 April 2011.
  25. ↑ "Survey finds zero Fukushima plant strontium contamination in soil samples – AJW by The Asahi Shimbun". Ajw.asahi.com. Archived from the original on 12 December 2013. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
  26. ↑ "2.4 trillion yen in Fukushima crisis compensation costs to be tacked onto power bills". Mainichi Daily News. The Mainichi. 10 December 2016. Retrieved 10 March 2017. At the meeting, the ministry also revealed that the estimated cost of dealing with the disaster has hit 21.5 trillion yen – nearly double the initial projection of 11 trillion yen.

    Total compensation for people affected by the disaster is estimated to rise from 5.4 trillion yen to 7.9 trillion yen, and decontamination-associated costs are likely to grow from 2.5 trillion yen to 4 trillion yen. The bill for building interim storage facilities for radioactive materials is expected to rise from 1.1 trillion yen to 1.6 trillion yen, while that of decommissioning reactors at the crippled plant will likely surge from 2 trillion yen to 8 trillion yen.
  27. ↑ The Mainichi Daily News (31 October 2011) Workers in shelters just outside gates of nuclear complex miss out on allowance Archived 31 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine
  28. ↑ JAIF (26 September 2011). Earthquake-report 216: Hydrogen check ordered at No.2, 3 reactors Archived 28 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  29. ↑ JAIF (10 October 2011). Earthquake-report 230: Hydrogen level falls at Fukushima plant Archived 6 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  30. ↑ The Mainichi Daily news (19 January 2012). TEPCO uses endoscope to look inside crippled Fukushima reactor Archived 15 July 2012 at archive.today .
  31. ↑ JAIF (20 January 2012). Earthquake-report 323: TEPCO fails to clearly see inside damaged reactor Archived 16 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine .
  32. ↑ nu.nl (20 January 2012). TEPCO films in reactor 2 (footage comments in Dutch).
  33. 1 2 "Japan quake: Radiation rises at Fukushima nuclear plant". BBC News. 14 March 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  34. 1 2 JAIF (15 March 2012). Earthquake report 374: Radiation high near suppression chambers.
  35. ↑ The Mainichi Shimbun (28 March 2012). Fukushima No. 2 reactor radiation level up to 73 sieverts per hour.
  36. ↑ "Tech companies to begin cleaning water at Japan nuclear plants". Gigaom.com. 17 June 2011. Retrieved 13 July 2011.
  37. ↑ "Russia floating nuclear waste plant ready to depart for Japan". ITAR TASS. 8 April 2011. Retrieved 11 April 2011.[ dead link ]
  38. ↑ JAIF (11 September 2011). Earthquake-Report 201: Challenges to contain nuclear accident [ permanent dead link ].
  39. ↑ "Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident Update (27 March, 03:00 UTC)". International Atomic Energy Agency. 27 March 2011. Retrieved 27 March 2011.
  40. ↑ Staff (24 March 2007). "Official: Workers touched water with radiation 10,000 times normal". CNN Wire. Retrieved 27 March 2011., records(2011) pp. 249–250.
  41. ↑ "TEPCO halts work to remove radioactive water". NHK WORLD English. 30 March 2011. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011.
  42. ↑ "Fukushima's radioactive water to be pumped into 'Mega Float'". Gizmodo. 30 March 2011. Retrieved 2 June 2011.
  43. ↑ "TEPCO may use floating island to hold tainted water". E.nikkei.com. 2 April 2011. Archived from the original on 23 August 2011. Retrieved 7 April 2011.
  44. ↑ "Increase your water play pool, use of Mega-Float for fishing" . Retrieved 24 April 2011.
  45. ↑ Westall, Sylvia (4 April 2011). "Japan to dump 11,500 metric tons of radioactive water The wastewater facility had 11,500 tons of water stored (by 10 April 8900 tons had been pumped into the sea)". Reuters. Retrieved 24 April 2011.
  46. 1 2 asahi.com (朝日新聞社)：Radiation fallout from Fukushima plant will take "months" to stop – English. Asahi.com (4 April 2011). Retrieved on 30 April 2011.
  47. ↑ "TEPCO : Seawater Piping Trench". www.tepco.co.jp. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  48. ↑ The Mainichi Shimbun (8 July 2013). Groundwater contamination level soars at Fukushima plant.
  49. ↑ The Mainichi Shimbun (10 July 2013). Cesium readings further climb in groundwater at Fukushima plant.
  50. ↑ The Mainichi Shimbun (11 July 2013). Radioactive water at Fukushima plant 'strongly suspected' of seeping into sea: NRA Archived 14 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine .
  51. ↑ The Asahi Shimbun (12 July 2013). Strontium detected in well on seaward side of Fukushima plant Archived 16 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine .
  52. ↑ The Asahi Shimbun (13 July 2013). TEPCO's plan to halt spread of radioactive water based on shaky theory Archived 17 July 2013 at the Wayback Machine .
  53. ↑ McCurry, Justin (28 March 2011). "Japanese nuclear firm admits error on radiation reading". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  54. ↑ 福島第一発電所２号機タービン建屋地下１階の滞留水について（助言）
  55. ↑ Photo, Press Release (TEPCO: 2011.4.2).
  56. ↑ "TEPCO : Press Release | Out flow of fluid containing radioactive materials to the ocean from areas near intake channel of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 2 (continued report)". www.tepco.co.jp. 6 April 2011. pp. 253–256. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  57. ↑ "TEPCO : Press Release | Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station Unit 2:Countermeasures to stop the outflow of contaminated water and the water amount flowed out into the sea". www.tepco.co.jp. 21 April 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  58. ↑ Roadmap towards Restoration from the Accident at Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (TEPCO:2011.4.17) TEPCO revised this roadmap many times in 2011 as follows: May 17th, June 17th, July 19th, Aug.17th, Sep. 20th, Oct. 17th, Nov. 17th.
  59. ↑ "TEPCO : Installation Plan of the Water Treatment Facility". www.tepco.co.jp. 27 April 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  60. ↑ "TEPCO : Press Release | Possible leakage of water including radioactive materials to the outside from around the intake canal of Unit 3 of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station". www.tepco.co.jp. 11 May 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  61. ↑ Appendix1 (NISA: 2011.5.25).
  62. ↑ Soramoto (2014), Recovery and processing of radioactive accumulated water at Fukushima Daiichi NPS, p. 9.
  63. ↑ Appendix3.
  64. ↑ Jaif (31 August 2011). 2 workers showered with highly radioactive water. Archived 11 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  65. ↑ "TEPCO : Press Release | Mid-and-long-Term Roadmap towards the Decommissioning of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Units 1–4". www.tepco.co.jp. 21 December 2011. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  66. ↑ NHK-world (5 April 2012). Strontium at Fukushima plant flows into sea [ permanent dead link ].
  67. ↑ 原子力規制委員会の施行に伴う関係政令の閣議決定について 原子力規制委員会設置法の施行日を定める政令要綱 (2012.9.11).
  68. ↑ "TEPCO : Hot test started for the multi-nuclide removal equipment (ALPS)". www.tepco.co.jp. 30 March 2013. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  69. ↑ On the day before, Japan's Upper House election was held.
  70. ↑ Increases in the Concentration of Radioactive Materials in Seawater and Groundwater on the Ocean Side of the Site: Current Situation and Countermeasures (TEPCO reference material).
  71. ↑ 汚染水の発電所港湾内への流出に関する公表問題について (TEPCO:2013.7.26).
  72. ↑ The Asahi Shimbun (28 July 2013). Extremely high tritium level found in water in pit at Fukushima plant. Archived 1 August 2013 at the Wayback Machine .
  73. ↑ 地下水の流入抑制のための対策 in 汚染水処理対策委員会（第3回） (2013.5.30).
  74. ↑ "TEPCO : Frozen soil wall". www.tepco.co.jp. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  75. ↑ "TEPCO : Contaminated Water Leakage from the Tank in the H4 Area". www.tepco.co.jp. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  76. ↑ "Background information and Press Release on INES provisional rating on contaminated water leakage from a water tank at Fukushima Daiichi NPS". Archived from the original on 16 January 2017. Retrieved 15 January 2017.
  77. ↑ NRA committee. Archived 16 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine (2013.8.28).
  78. ↑ "Fukushima worker had contamination over head, face and chest on transferring water from the leaking tank". Fukushima Diary. 17 June 2013. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  79. ↑ TEPCO (in Japanese). Handout 130828 07.
  80. ↑ Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters. Government's Decision on Addressing the Contaminated Water Issue at TEPCO's Fukushima Daiichi NPS.
  81. ↑ "TEPCO : Contaminated Water Leakage from the Tank in the H4 Area (follow-up info)". www.tepco.co.jp. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  82. ↑ Wakatsuki, Yoko (10 September 2019). "Japan may have to dump radioactive Fukushima water into the ocean because it's out of storage space". CNN . Retrieved 10 September 2019.
  83. ↑ NHK (12 September 2019). New environment minister apologizes to fishermen.
  84. ↑ "Japanese fishermen urge government not to release Fukushima water to ocean". CNN. 8 October 2020. Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  85. ↑ The Mainichi Daily news (3 October 2011). Radioactive waste piles up at Fukushima nuclear plant as disposal method remains in limbo. Archived 5 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  86. ↑ Jaif (16 August 2011). Desalinisation of spent fuel pools . Archived 18 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  87. ↑ "FUEL REMOVAL FROM UNIT 4 REACTOR BUILDING COMPLETED AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI". www.tepco.co.jp. Retrieved 30 April 2011.
  88. ↑ NHK, "TEPCO Uses Unmanned Equipment To Remove Rubble", 10 April 2011.
  89. ↑ "TEPCO unveils plan to seal Fukushima reactors". The Guardian. London, England. 15 June 2011. Retrieved 6 August 2011.
  90. ↑ Saoshiro, Shinichi (18 March 2011). "Japan weighs need to bury nuclear plant; tries to restore power". Reuters. Retrieved 18 March 2011.
  91. ↑ Alleyne, Richard (19 March 2011). "Japan nuclear crisis: scientists consider burying Fukushima in a 'Chernobyl sarcophagus'". The Daily Telegraph. London, England.
  92. ↑ JAIF (7 September 2011). Nishizawa:TEPCO to scrap Fukushima reactors. Archived 19 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine .
  93. ↑ NHK-world (28 October 2011). Fuel retrieval at Fukushima to start in 10 years . Archived 28 October 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  94. ↑ JAIF (29 October 2011). Earthquake-report 249: Fuel retrieval at Fukushima to start in 10 years. Archived 17 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine .
  95. 1 2 JAIF (10 November 2011). Earthquake-report 261.
  96. ↑ NHK-world (9 November 2011). Commission releases report on scrapping N-plant. Archived 13 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  97. ↑ NHK-world (10 November 2011). TEPCO to monitor xenon at Fukushima plant. Archived 12 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  98. 1 2 JAIF (20 September 2011). Earthquake-report 211: A new plan set to reduce radiation emissions . Archived 19 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine .
  99. ↑ "Reactor feared in meltdown, radiation spreads". ABC News. 30 March 2011. Retrieved 30 March 2011.
  100. ↑ Radiation-shielding sheets to be installed in September at earliest, Kyodo News. English.kyodonews.jp. Retrieved on 30 April 2011.
  101. ↑ "TEPCO to cover No.1 reactor building". NHK. 14 May 2011. Archived from the original on 13 May 2011. Retrieved 2 June 2011.
  102. ↑ JAIF (20 September 2011). Steel Frame for Unit 1 Reactor Building Cover is Complete. Archived 19 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine .
  103. ↑ "Test run for Fukushima Daiichi 3 cover installation". World Nuclear News. 13 June 2016. Retrieved 14 June 2016.
  104. ↑ "Kukushima plant reactor gets new roof cover". NHK Newsline. 20 February 2018. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
  105. ↑ Hot-spot cleanups hampered by public resistance to local disposal sites – The Mainichi Daily News. Archived 27 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  106. ↑ No quick way to remove radioactive substances from soil: experts – The Mainichi Daily News. Archived 27 August 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  107. ↑ JAIF (10 October 2011). Earthquake-report 231: Decontamination-plan compiled. Archived 6 November 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  108. ↑ JAIF (20 December 2011). Earthquake report 296: Govt to designate nuclear clean-up areas. Archived 3 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine .
  109. ↑ Knight, Sophie (14 August 2013). "Japan's nuclear clean-up: costly, complex and at risk of failing | Reuters". In.reuters.com. Retrieved 24 December 2013.
  110. ↑ "Nuclear evacuation zone changes inspire hope, despondency in Fukushima town – 毎日ｊｐ(毎日新聞)". Archived from the original on 21 August 2013. Retrieved 21 August 2013.
  111. ↑ NHK-world (22 February 2012). Seabed near nuke plant to be covered with cement. Archived 27 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine .
  112. ↑ The Daily Yomiuri (18 December 2011). Govt speeds rezoning of contaminated areas.
  113. ↑ Hornyak, Tim. "Clearing the Radioactive Rubble Heap That Was Fukushima Daiichi, 7 Years On". Scientific American. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  114. ↑ The Mainichi Daily News (21 December 2011). Fukushima local decontamination costs bust estimates. Archived 21 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine .
  115. ↑ Kirby, Peter Wynn (7 March 2016). "Opinion | Playing Pass the Parcel With Fukushima". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 21 May 2024.
  116. ↑ Funabashi, Yoichi; Kitazawa, Kay (1 March 2012). "Fukushima in review: A complex disaster, a disastrous response". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Archived from the original on 2 February 2016. Retrieved 2 March 2012.

Sources

Management of contaminated water
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.