| Founded | 1999 |
|---|---|
| Founder | Gregory Stanton |
| Website | genocidewatch |
Genocide Watch is a non-governmental organization based in Washington, D.C. which campaigns against genocide, and the various stages running up towards genocide. It was founded by Gregory Stanton in 1999. [1] [2] [3] [4] Genocide Watch is known for its publicizing of Stanton's analysis tool and policy model known as the ten stages of genocide. Genocide Watch is a US registered non-profit and coordinator of the Alliance Against Genocide, which includes 125 organizations in 31 countries, including the Minority Rights Group, the International Crisis Group, the Aegis Trust, and Survival International. [5] [6]
Under the leadership of Stanton, Genocide Watch has formed alliances with dozens of human rights leaders, such as Baroness Kennedy and Ewelina Ochab from the Coalition for Genocide Response. [7]
Stanton has criticized the term "ethnic cleansing", considering it a euphemism for genocide which serves to facilitate genocide denial, whitewash atrocities, and impede genocide prevention. [8] He also rejects the "only intent" doctrine that the International Court of Justice used in Bosnia v Serbia and Croatia v Serbia to find that because Serbia's intent was "ethnic cleansing," Serbia's "sole" and "only" intent was not genocide, Serbia had not violated the Genocide Convention. [9] [ clarification needed ] According to Stanton, this ICJ precedent may complicate convicting Israel of genocide in Gaza. [10]
The organization issues three levels of alerts: watch, warning, and emergency. [11]
Genocide Watch has released numerous alerts that identify a campaign of genocide against Armenians due to Azerbaijan's 2023 military siege and offensive in Nagorno-Karabakh and the expulsion of all ethnic Armenians from the territory. [12] [13] [14]
In 2022, Genocide Watch issued a warning against Azerbaijan’s "unprovoked" military attacks on Armenia and the Republic of Artsakh. [15] Genocide Watch's earlier alerts in 2020 during the Second Nagorno-Karabakh War drew condemnation from Henry Theriault and Armen Marsoobian — both genocide scholars — for misidentifying the Armenians as perpetrators. [16] [17] Henry Theriault specifically criticizes Genocide Watch's 10-stage stage model of genocide, arguing that it distorted analysis, enabled false accusations, and aided Azerbaijan. [18]
Its board of advisers includes former commander of United Nations peacekeeping forces in Rwanda Roméo Dallaire, former Nuremberg Prosecutor Benjamin Ferencz, former US Ambassador to the United Nations and former Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Samantha Power, [19] [20] and former UN Special Advisers for the Prevention of Genocide Adama Dieng and Alice Nderitu. [21]
Genocide Watch is known for its publicizing of Stanton's analysis tool and policy model known as the ten stages of genocide. This enumerates steps whereby a society may evolve towards committing genocide, running from initially increasingly classifying people as "them" or "us", via a number of intermediate stages, including 'polarisation', to the genocidal 'extermination' (a term often used by the killers rather than 'murder', because they do not believe their victims to be fully human) and afterwards to a post-genocide phase when the perpetrators deny that they committed any crimes. [22] At an earlier stage in its development, the tool referred to eight stages of the process, [23] before adding the 'Discrimination' and 'Persecution' stages.
Genocide Watch was founded in 1999. [24] [2]
In 2010, Genocide Watch was the first organization to assert that the 1980s Gukurahundi massacres in Zimbabwe met the definition of genocide, [25] calling for the prosecution of Zimbabwean leaders including president Robert Mugabe. [26] [27]
In 2020, Genocide Watch joined other human rights groups urging the U.N. Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to investigate the actions of the Chinese government regarding Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in the Xinjiang region, and demand that China end persecution of Uyghurs that amount to acts of genocide. [28]
In the case of Bosco Ntaganda within the International Criminal Court investigation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Genocide Watch submitted amicus curiae observations [29] along with the Antiquities Coalition and Blue Shield International, on the interpretation of attacks on cultural property in the Rome Statute. [30]
In recent years, Genocide Watch have also published a number of reports and statements: the 'United States of America Report' highlighting genocidal aspects of racial tension in the US, [31] a number of statements regarding the Russia-Ukraine Genocide which conclude that Russia's Ukraine War is genocidal, [32] and statements regarding the Israel-Gaza conflict, which describe both Hamas' initial attack and some of Israel's military response as genocidal. [33] [ non-primary source needed ]
Genocide Watch has three levels of Genocide Alerts. * A Genocide Watch is declared when there are signs of the early stages of the genocidal process. See The Ten Stages of Genocide. * A Genocide Warning is called when the genocidal process has reached the stages of preparation by perpetrators and persecution of a targeted group. * A Genocide Emergency is declared when the genocidal process has reached the stage of genocidal massacres and other acts of genocide
...many Armenian officials, international genocide scholars, and international genocide prevention organizations were united in identifying Azerbaijan's actions as a mass atrocity crime, either 'ethnic cleansing' or 'genocide.' Armenian officials tended to prefer the term 'ethnic cleansing' while genocide scholars were convinced that Azerbaijan was committing genocide. The latter includes former ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno Ocampo, Genocide Watch, and the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention.
More than a dozen nongovernmental organisations, including Genocide Watch, have issued a stark warning that Azerbaijan's blockade is 'designed to, in the words of the Genocide Convention, deliberately inflict conditions of life calculated to bring about the end of a national, ethnic, racial or religious group in whole or in part. All 14 risk factors for atrocity crimes identified by the UN Secretary-General's Office on Genocide Prevention are now present.'
We are not alone in our assessment of the situation in Nagorno-Karabakh.6 The International Association of Genocide Scholars warned of the "risk of genocide", the Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention issued an active genocide alert, and Genocide Watch has declared a genocide emergency.
In September 2022, Genocide Watch also issued a Genocide Warning, noting that 'due to its unprovoked attacks and genocidal rhetoric against ethnic Armenians, Genocide Watch considers Azerbaijan's assault on Armenia and Artsakh to be at Stage 4: Dehumanization, Stage 7: Preparation, Stage 8: Persecution, and Stage 10: Denial.'
In this perverse logic, the Armenians of Artsakh have become the perpetrators. Unfortunately, even some human rights organizations have slipped down this slippery slope, evidenced by the factual errors found in the alerts initially posted during the 2020 Karabakh war by Genocide Watch.
Even after the debilitating flaws in this country report [by Genocide Watch], including dependence on illegitimate Azerbaijani nationalist sources, were pointed out to Genocide Watch, the organization refused to substantively modify its genocide warning against Armenia. That this happened during the war, as Azerbaijani drones were mass murdering Armenians across Artsakh/Nagorno-Karabakh, might have been a factor in preventing international political intervention against Azerbaijani violence; after all, if Armenians were on their way to perpetrating genocide, then Azerbaijan's attack could be misrepresented as defense. What is especially chilling in this case is that an organization supposedly committed to preventing genocide might have helped advanced a genocidal process.
...this declaration and demonization of Armenians remarkably benefited Azeri propaganda efforts and undermined Armenian attempts to call attention to the one-sided nature of the violence and extensive human rights violations and war crimes by the forces of Azerbaijan and Turkey,