Grave robbery

Last updated

Grave robbery, tomb robbing, or tomb raiding is the act of uncovering a grave, tomb or crypt to steal commodities. It is usually perpetrated to take and profit from valuable artefacts or personal property. [n 1] A related act is body snatching, a term denoting the contested or unlawful taking of a body (seldom from a grave), which can be extended to the unlawful taking of organs alone.

Contents

Hole that was dug by looters in Chan Chan, Peru Chan Chan Peru- Hole that was dug by looters.jpg
Hole that was dug by looters in Chan Chan, Peru

Grave robbing has caused great difficulty to the studies of archaeology, art history, and history. [1] [2] Countless precious grave sites and tombs have been robbed before scholars were able to examine them. In any way, the archaeological context and the historical and anthropological information are destroyed:

Looting obliterates the memory of the ancient world and turns its highest artistic creations into decorations, adornments on a shelf, divorced from historical context and ultimately from all meaning. [3]

Grave robbers who are not caught usually sell relatively modern items anonymously and artifacts on the black market. Those intercepted, in a public justice domain, are inclined to deny their guilt. Though some artifacts may make their way to museums or scholars, the majority end up in private collections. [4]

Effects on archaeology around the world

China

Grave robbing in China is a practice stretching back to antiquity; the classic Chinese text Lüshi Chunqiu , dating to the 2nd century BCE, advised readers to plan simple burials to discourage looting. [5] The presence of jade burial suits and other valuables in tombs were powerful temptations to rob graves. [6]

In modern China, grave robbing has been perpetrated by both amateurs (such as farmers and migrant laborers) and by professional thieves associated with transnational criminal networks. [5] The practice reached epidemic proportions in the 1980s, as the development and construction boom following the Chinese economic reform led to many archaeological sites being revealed. [5] Other peaks of tomb robbing occurred in the early 2000s and in the 2010s, when the plunder of graves was on the upswing due to an increase in global and domestic demand (and prices) for Chinese antiquities. [5] The provinces of Henan, Shaanxi, and Shanxi were particularly affected by tomb robbing. [5]

Egypt

Ancient Egyptian tombs are one of the most common examples of tomb or grave robbery. Most of the tombs in Egypt's Valley of the Kings were robbed within one hundred years of their sealing [7] [8] (including the tomb of the famous King Tutankhamen, which was raided at least twice before it was discovered in 1922). [9] As most of the artifacts in these ancient burial sites have been discovered, it is through the conditions of the tombs and presumed articles that are missing in which historians and archaeologists are able to determine whether the tomb has been robbed. Egyptian pharaohs often kept records of the precious items in their tombs, so an inventory check is presumed for archaeologists. [10] Oftentimes, warnings would be left by the Pharaohs in the tombs of calamities and curses that would be laid upon any who touched the treasure, or the bodies, which did little to deter grave robbers. There are many examples of grave robbing in the Ancient World outside of Egypt. [11]

Classical Antiquity

The Romans (Byzantium) also suffered decades of theft and destruction of tombs, crypts, and graves. [12]

Europe

In parts of Europe, graves are robbed on an accelerating and alarming scale. Many grave robbers work with metal detectors and some of the groups are organised criminals, feeding the black market with highly prized archaeological artifacts. [13]

Merovingian graves in France and Germany and Anglo-Saxon graves in England contain many metal grave goods, mostly of iron. Grave robbers often leave them, being only interested in gold and silver. Grave contexts, ceramics, iron weapons and skeletons are typically destroyed in the process. [14]

In Eastern Europe, including Southeast Europe and the European part of Russia, grave robbers target all kinds of historically important graves, from prehistoric tombs to World War II graves. [15] [16] [13]

North America

Modern grave robbing in North America also involves long-abandoned or forgotten private Antebellum Period to pre-Great Depression era grave sites. These sites are often desecrated by grave robbers in search of old and valuable jewellery. Affected sites are typically in rural, forested areas where once-prominent, wealthy landowners and their families were interred. The remote and often undocumented locations of defunct private cemeteries make them particularly susceptible to grave robbery. The practice may be encouraged by default upon the discovery of a previously unknown family cemetery by a new landowner.

One notable historical incident occurred during the evening of November 7, 1876, when a group of counterfeiters attempted to steal Abraham Lincoln's body from his grave in Springfield, Illinois, in an attempt to secure the release of their imprisoned leader, counterfeit engraver Benjamin Boyd. However, a Secret Service agent was present and had notified the police beforehand, so the grave robbers only succeeded in dislodging the lid of his coffin. As a consequence, when Lincoln was reburied, additional security measures were implemented to prevent further grave robbery attempts. [17] [18]

Central America

Grave robbers often sold stolen Aztec or Mayan goods on the black market for an extremely high price. The buyers (museum curators, historians, etc.) didn't often suffer the repercussions of being in possession of stolen goods; the blame (and charges) were placed upon the lower-class grave robbers. Today's antiquities trade has become a streamlined industry, the speed at which these artifacts enter the market has grown exponentially. Laws to prevent grave robbing have been enacted in these regions, but due to extreme poverty, these grave robberies continue to grow each year.

Race

African Americans

Leonard Medical School Graduating Class of 1889 Leonard Medical School graduating class of 1889.JPG
Leonard Medical School Graduating Class of 1889

Enslaved and free blacks, immigrants, and the poor were frequently the target of grave robbing.

Edward C. Halperin

African Americans would often be compelled to bury their dead in a potter's field, not having the access or money for a proper funeral. When buried in potter's fields, the dead were not normally buried very deeply. A grave robber could wait discreetly in the distance until nobody else was in sight, then quickly and easily disinter the body from its shallow resting place. [19]

Once the railroad was invented and tracks laid, the sale of the bodies of African American slaves from the South for dissection began in earnest. The bodies were robbed from graves by night doctors and shipped to medical schools in the northern part of the United States. One New England anatomy professor reported that, in the 1880s and 1890s, he entered into an arrangement in which he received, twice each semester, a shipment of 12 bodies of southern African Americans. "They came in barrels labeled [as containing] turpentine and were shipped to a local hardware store that dealt in painting materials". [20]

State laws in Mississippi and North Carolina were passed in the 19th century which allowed medical schools to use the remains of those at the bottom of society's hierarchy—the unclaimed bodies of poor persons and residents of almshouses, and those buried in potter's fields for anatomical study. [21] [22] The option to dissect Confederate soldiers was also available, as Mississippi and North Carolina legally released those bodies to the families of the deceased. The North Carolina law also provided that the bodies of whites never be sent to an African American medical college (such as the Leonard Medical School). These African American medical schools typically obtained unclaimed Black ‘‘potter’s field bodies’’. [23]

Australia

The practice of grave robbery against Aboriginal Australians can be traced back to the early days of British colonisation, when Aboriginal burial sites were viewed merely as sites of scientific curiosity and anthropological study, and sought to collect and study their remains before they disappeared altogether. [24] [25]

This belief was reflected in the work of anthropologists and scientists who travelled to Australia in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to collect Aboriginal remains for study. These remains were not only taken without the consent of Indigenous communities but were used to advance racist and pseudoscientific theories about their supposed inferiority. [26] [27] [28] [29]

It was a common practice carried out by medical students who needed corpses for dissection and research. This practice continued until the late nineteenth century when laws were introduced to regulate the supply of cadavers for medical research. [30]

This was all part of a broader pattern of colonial violence against Indigenous Australians, which included forced removal from their land, massacres, and the forced assimilation of Indigenous children into white Australian society. [31]

One of the most notorious examples of grave robbery in Australia is the case of the Tasmanian Aboriginals (see also: Black War). After the last full-blooded Tasmanian Aboriginal woman died in 1876, her body was exhumed and her skeleton sent to the Royal College of Surgeons in London for study. It was not until 1976, a century later, that her remains were finally returned to Australia for a proper burial. [32] [33] [34]

The practice continued well into the twentieth century, with some cases reported as recently as the 1970s. The theft and desecration of Aboriginal burial sites and remains has had profound and ongoing impacts on Indigenous communities in Australia. For many Indigenous Australians, the loss of their ancestors' remains has denied them the opportunity to mourn and grieve their loved ones. It has also perpetuated a legacy of trauma and dispossession that has been passed down through the generations. [35]

Efforts to repatriate stolen Indigenous remains and protect Indigenous burial sites have been ongoing in Australia for many years. In recent years, there has been a growing movement to return stolen remains to their traditional owners for proper burial and commemoration. [36] [37]

Deterrents

Geography

Examples of the terrain within Mount Auburn Cemetery Mount Auburn Cemetery terrain.jpg
Examples of the terrain within Mount Auburn Cemetery

The geography and placement of burial grounds became a deterrent within itself. This is because without the accessibility of the automobile (in the early 19th century), the transportation of bodies was difficult.

A perfect example of this is Mount Auburn Cemetery, [38] in Cambridge Massachusetts. It was the first rural cemetery inside the United States. The rural location of the cemetery created transportation issues. In addition, the terrain of and around the cemetery was formidable. Further, Henry Alexander Scammell Dearborn, the designer wanted to leave the natural terrain (including ponds and hills) within the cemetery. If someone wanted to rob a grave, they would have to maneuver around these obstacles and navigate large stretches of land in the dark. Note that Mount Auburn Cemetery is over 175 acres. [39] Other cemeteries, of the time, that were originally built away from populated areas for similar reasons, include: Mount Hope Cemetery in Bangor, Maine (1834); Laurel Hill Cemetery in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (1836); Mount Pleasant Cemetery in Taunton, Massachusetts (1836); Mount Hope Cemetery in Rochester, New York (1838); Green-Wood Cemetery in Brooklyn, New York (1838); and, Green Mount Cemetery in Baltimore, Maryland (1838).

Mortsafes

Mortsafes at Logeriat Church in Perthshire, Scotland Mortsafe at Logeriat Church1.jpg
Mortsafes at Logeriat Church in Perthshire, Scotland

A mortsafe or mort safe was an iron coffin or framework which helped to protect a grave by preventing the body from being dug up and taken away. Mortsafes were specific for the task of preventing bodies from being stolen for purposes of medical dissections. [40] Other variants included movable stone slabs capable of being hoisted over the fresh grave. All work on the principle of greatly increasing the required time for criminals to access the grave.

These deterrents, used commonly in Scotland, would be rented from the sexton until the body decomposed and were used on a circulating basis. At the passage of the Dissections Act the purpose became redundant and they were left where last used, sometimes being incorporated into the grave marker by addition of inscription.

Mort houses

Udny Mort House in Aberdeenshire, north-east Scotland Udny Mort House 02.JPG
Udny Mort House in Aberdeenshire, north-east Scotland

A mort house, ossuaries or dead house was used to store bones (usually skulls and femurs) gleaned from graves a year or two after burial. They are common throughout northern Europe. They usually predate any graverobbing periods and indeed serve no purpose in relation to graverobbing as they stored bones not bodies.

Up to 31 recorded mort houses were scattered throughout Scotland and northern England. [41] Usually these structures were built within or near cemeteries to make transportation easier. Prior to grave robbers, they were used to store dead bodies in the winter, being that the ground was too cold and in some cases impossible to dig into. An example is the Udny Mort House built in 1832, Aberdeenshire, north-east Scotland and still standing today.

Coffin collars

The coffin collar was an iron collar often fixed to a piece of wood. [42] It was fixed around the neck of a corpse and then bolted to the bottom of a coffin. Most common reports of these collars being used came from Scotland around the 1820s.

Family mausoleums

The Freeland Mausoleum at Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Massachusetts Freeland Grave.png
The Freeland Mausoleum at Mount Auburn Cemetery in Cambridge, Massachusetts

Mausolea do not play a major role in the history of graverobbing and are largely built as a display of wealth rather than security.

Historically mausoleums have been used as a sign of a family's wealth and a symbol of gentry and nobility in many countries. In the mid and late 19th century in North America, more and more families began to buy mausoleums. The belief was that it would be easier for a Resurrectionist or grave robber to dig up a grave rather than to topple down iron or steel doors guarding the mausoleum. A flaw in the design of the mausoleum was the stained glass or other windows within. Almost every family between the 18th and 19th century had a religious affiliation. As such, many of these families (usually with a Christian affiliation) would put stained glass within the mausoleums. The grave robbers would then just have to smash the glass to break in and to retrieve the body. Making it even easier, around the 1830s families began to fear burying family members. To remedy this, families would put a spare key somewhere within the mausoleum [43] and create doors with two way locks. In short, grave robbers could break a window, recover the body, find the key, and walk straight out the front door of the mausoleum.

Cemetery Vaults

Unlike mausolea, cemetery vaults did play a functional role in protection against graverobbing. These feature strongly in French and British layouts. Typically these would be a semi-enclosed stone structure with an ornamental cast iron access gate and usually plainer rails to the roof or sides.

Although the protective function of the vaults became redundant by 1840 most mid 19th century cemeteries continue to include vaults as a visual focal point in their layouts. This is often a critical point within overall composition.

Guards/guarding

One of the most simplistic and low-tech methods to prevent grave robbing were to have an individual guard over the newly buried body. This was done until decomposition of the body was brought to a point where they would no longer be desirable for medical use. If families did not have enough money to hire an individual to watch over the grave for a select number of days, the family would delegate this duty amongst them and close friends. As grave robbing became a lucrative business in the 19th century, a bribe would convince some guards to look the other way. [44]

In Scotland, construction of guard towers became common in the late 18th century, usually in a position overlooking most of the burial ground.

Deception

Within the Great Pyramid of Giza (completed around 2560 BC), [45] an Egyptian deterrent system was built to guard the tomb of Pharaoh Khufu. This system consists of blocks and grooves to protect the King's Chamber from tomb robbers. Some experts believe that Pharaoh Khufu's tomb has actually not been found because of the deterrent system; instead, what had been found by grave robbers were fake chambers. [46]

See also

Notes and references

Notes
  1. Daniel (1950), p. 11
  2. Atwood (2004), p. 9
  3. Atwood (2004), p. 10
  4. Huffer, Damien; University, Stockholm; Graham, Shawn (2017). "The Insta-Dead: The rhetoric of the human remains trade on Instagram". Internet Archaeology (45). doi: 10.11141/ia.45.5 .
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Qin, Amy (July 15, 2017). "Tomb Robbing, Perilous but Alluring, Makes Comeback in China". New York Times.
  6. Paul van Els (2018). The Wenzi: Creativity and Intertextuality in Early Chinese Philosophy. Studies in the History of Chinese Texts. Brill. p. 12.
  7. Ryan, Donald P. "Further Observations Concerning the Valley of the Kings". Pacific Lutheran University. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  8. "Tombs hidden in Valley of the Kings hold many more Egypt mummy mysteries". NBC News. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  9. Gardiner (2007), p. 147
  10. Gardiner (2007), p. 244
  11. Mueller, Tom (June 2016). "How Tomb Raiders Are Stealing Our History". National Geographic. Archived from the original on May 13, 2016.
  12. Shelton (1998), p. 95
  13. 1 2 Kraske, Marion (21 December 2007). "Bulgaria Plagued by 'Grave Robbers'". Spiegel Online. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  14. "In touch with the dead". Leiden University. Retrieved 22 May 2022.
  15. "Rise of the Nazi-Grave Robbers". Bloomberg Businessweek. 23 August 2016. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  16. "Grave robbing ghouls who trade in Nazi relics". Sunday Express. 8 September 2012. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
  17. Craughwell (2007)
  18. Keith Verinese: "The Adventures of Abraham Lincoln's Corpse:" http://io9.com/S898746/the-adventures-of-abraham-lincolns-corpse%5B%5D
  19. "History of African-American Cemeteries". www.sciway.net. Retrieved 31 July 2016.
  20. Waite, Frederick C. (1945). "Grave robbing in New England". Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. Public Library of Fort Wayne and Allen County. 33 (3): 272–294. PMC   194496 . PMID   16016694.
  21. Richardson, Ruth (2000). Death, Dissection and the Destitute (2 ed. with a new afterword. ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. ISBN   9780226712406.
  22. Humphrey, DC (September 1973). "Dissection and Discrimination: the Social Origins of Cadavers in America, 1760-1915". Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine. 49 (9): 819–27. PMC   1807060 . PMID   4582559.
  23. Moore, Wendy (2005). The Knife Man : Blood, Body Snatching, and the Birth of Modern Surgery (1st pbk. ed.). New York: Broadway Books. ISBN   0767916530.
  24. "Collecting Indigenous bodies was a preoccupation of early settlers." National Museum of Australia, https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/collecting-indigenous-bodies#:~:text=Many%20settlers%20believed%20that%20Indigenous%20peoples%20were%20a,Europe%20and%20study%20them%20before%20they%20disappeared%20altogether
  25. "Looting the bodies of Aboriginal people added to the trauma of colonisation." The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2021/mar/31/looting-the-bodies-of-aboriginal-people-added-to-the-trauma-of-colonisation
  26. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. (2019). Collecting Indigenous human remains. Retrieved from https://aiatsis.gov.au/explore/articles/collecting-indigenous-human-remains
  27. National Museum Australia. (2021). Collecting Indigenous remains. Retrieved from https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/collecting-indigenous-remains
  28. Australian Broadcasting Company. (2018). The dark history of Australia's Indigenous remains trade. Retrieved from https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-23/indigenous-remains-history-australia/9890884
  29. The Guardian. (2019). 'Indefensible': The Australian academics studying artefacts taken from Indigenous people. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/oct/23/indefensible-the-australian-academics-studying-artefacts-taken-from-indigenous-people
  30. Mendelson, D. (2018). Body-snatching and grave-robbing in colonial Australia. Journal of Medical Biography, 26(2), 62-68. doi:10.1177/0967772015620039
  31. Beresford, Q. (2020). The history of racial violence against Indigenous Australians. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/the-history-of-racial-violence-against-indigenous-australians-136578
  32. "Tasmanian Aboriginals and Grave Robbery." Australian Human Rights Commission. https://humanrights.gov.au/our-work/aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-social-justice/publications/tasmanian-aboriginals-and.
  33. "Tasmanian Aboriginal people." National Museum of Australia. https://www.nma.gov.au/defining-moments/resources/tasmanian-aboriginal-people.
  34. "Tasmanian Aboriginals, Colonisation and Protection: 1803-1900." Parliament of Tasmania Library. https://www.parliament.tas.gov.au/tpl/datasheets/Tasmanianaboriginals1803-1900.pdf.
  35. The Guardian. (2020, June 15). 'We're not pets': Australia's stolen Indigenous remains are still being fought over 100 years on. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/jun/15/were-not-pets-australias-stolen-indigenous-remains-are-still-being-fought-over-100-years-on
  36. Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. (n.d.). Repatriation - the return of the remains of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to their communities. Retrieved from https://aiatsis.gov.au/research/research-themes/repatriation-return-remains-aboriginal-and-torres-strait-islander-people-their-communities
  37. National Indigenous Australians Agency. (2019). Indigenous repatriation. Retrieved from https://www.niaa.gov.au/indigenous-affairs/repatriation/indigenous-repatriation
  38. "Mount Auburn Cemetery". mountauburn.org.
  39. "Mount Auburn Cemetery--Massachusetts Conservation: A Discover Our Shared Heritage Travel Itinerary". www.nps.gov. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
  40. Lennox, Suzie (2016-09-30). Bodysnatchers: Digging Up The Untold Stories of Britain's Resurrection Men. Barnsley, South Yorkshire: Pen and Sword History. p. 39,65. ISBN   9781473866577.
  41. Gorman, Martyn. "Map Showing the Distribution of Morthouses in Scottish Graveyards". www.abdn.ac.uk. University of Aberdeen. Retrieved 5 August 2016.
  42. "National Museums of Scotland - Coffin Collar". nms.scran.ac.uk. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
  43. "Mausoleum Locks (19th & 20th century)". Archived from the original on 26 March 2015. Retrieved 30 July 2016.
  44. Davis, Lauren (13 October 2013). "8 Ways to Keep Body Snatchers from Stealing Your Corpse" . Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  45. "The Great Pyramid of Giza: Last Remaining Wonder of the Ancient World". World History Encyclopedia . Retrieved 6 August 2016.
  46. Jarus, Owen (11 July 2016). "'Primitive Machine' Within Great Pyramid of Giza Reconstructed". Live Science. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
References
  1. All three long-used terms bear their plain (natural) meaning, specifically that robbing and raiding in this context mean stealing. In English, Welsh and Scottish law "to rob"/"robbery" is limited to an intentional threat or attack against a person so as to steal - i.e. some form of assault or battery. In more common colloquial use the term "rob" is also used transitively with any type of place meaning to steal from. This means that, internationally, stealing of coffins/urns containing remains, components of these items or taking bodies from their proper, intended final resting place is also caught by the term

Bibliography

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tomb</span> Repository for the remains of the dead

A tomb is a repository for the remains of the dead. It is generally any structurally enclosed interment space or burial chamber, of varying sizes. Placing a corpse into a tomb can be called immurement, although this word mainly means entombing people alive, and is a method of final disposition, as an alternative to cremation or burial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burial</span> Ritual act of placing a dead person into the ground

Burial, also known as interment or inhumation, is a method of final disposition whereby a dead body is placed into the ground, sometimes with objects. This is usually accomplished by excavating a pit or trench, placing the deceased and objects in it, and covering it over. A funeral is a ceremony that accompanies the final disposition. Evidence suggests that some archaic and early modern humans buried their dead. Burial is often seen as indicating respect for the dead. It has been used to prevent the odor of decay, to give family members closure and prevent them from witnessing the decomposition of their loved ones, and in many cultures it has been seen as a necessary step for the deceased to enter the afterlife or to give back to the cycle of life.

Embalming is the art and science of preserving human remains by treating them to forestall decomposition. This is usually done to make the deceased suitable for viewing as part of the funeral ceremony or keep them preserved for medical purposes in an anatomical laboratory. The three goals of embalming are sanitization, presentation, and preservation, with restoration being an important additional factor in some instances. Performed successfully, embalming can help preserve the body for a duration of many years. Embalming has a very long and cross-cultural history, with many cultures giving the embalming processes a greater religious meaning.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grave</span> Burial location of a dead body

A grave is a location where a dead body is buried or interred after a funeral. Graves are usually located in special areas set aside for the purpose of burial, such as graveyards or cemeteries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Royal Mausoleum (Mauna ʻAla)</span> United States historic place

Mauna ʻAla in the Hawaiian language, is the Royal Mausoleum of Hawaii and the final resting place of Hawaii's two prominent royal families: the Kamehameha Dynasty and the Kalākaua Dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Body snatching</span> Secret removal of corpses from burial sites

Body snatching is the illicit removal of corpses from graves, morgues, and other burial sites. Body snatching is distinct from the act of grave robbery as grave robbing does not explicitly involve the removal of the corpse, but rather theft from the burial site itself. The term 'body snatching' most commonly refers to the removal and sale of corpses primarily for the purpose of dissection or anatomy lectures in medical schools. The term was coined primarily in regard to cases in the United Kingdom and United States throughout the 17th, 18th, and 19th centuries. However, there have been cases of body snatching in many countries, with the first recorded case dating back to 1319 in Bologna, Italy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Funeral and burial of Abraham Lincoln</span>

After Abraham Lincoln was assassinated on April 14, 1865, a three-week series of events was held to mourn the death and memorialize the life of the 16th president of the United States. Funeral services, a procession, and a lying in state were first held in Washington, D.C., then a funeral train transported Lincoln's remains 1,654 miles (2,662 km) through seven states for burial in Springfield, Illinois. Never exceeding 20 mph, the train made several stops in principal cities and state capitals for processions, orations, and additional lyings in state. Millions of Americans viewed the train along the route and participated in associated ceremonies.

Disposal of human corpses, also called final disposition, is the practice and process of dealing with the remains of a deceased human being. Disposal methods may need to account for the fact that soft tissue will decompose relatively rapidly, while the skeleton will remain intact for thousands of years under certain conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stolen body hypothesis</span> Theory to explain the empty tomb of Jesus

The stolen body hypothesis posits that the body of Jesus Christ was stolen from his burial place. His tomb was found empty not because he was resurrected, but because the body had been hidden somewhere else by the apostles or unknown persons. Both the stolen body hypothesis and the debate over it presume the basic historicity of the gospel accounts of the tomb discovery. The stolen body hypothesis finds the idea that the body was not in the tomb plausible – such a claim could be checked if early Christians made it – but considers it more likely that early Christians had been misled into believing the resurrection by the theft of Jesus's body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Looting of the Eastern Mausoleum</span>

The Looting of the Eastern Mausoleum was an incident in which some of the major mausoleums of the Chinese Qing dynasty in the Eastern Qing tombs were looted by troops under the command of the warlord Sun Dianying.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burial vault (tomb)</span> Underground container for burial

A burial vault is a structural stone or brick-lined underground tomb or 'burial chamber' for the interment of a single body or multiple bodies underground. The main difference between entombment in a subterranean vault and a traditional in-ground burial is, that the coffin is not placed directly in the earth, but is placed in a burial chamber, specially built for this purpose. A burial vault refers to an underground chamber, in contrast to an above-ground, freestanding mausoleum. These underground burial tombs were originally and are still often vaulted and usually have stone slab entrances. They are often privately owned and used for specific family or other groups, but usually stand beneath a public religious building, such as a church, or in a churchyard or cemetery. A crypt may be used as a burial vault and a freestanding mausoleum may contain a burial vault beneath the ground.

The ancient Egyptian document PapyrusLeopold II, is part of the original court records dealing with the tomb robberies under Ramesses IX and dates to Year 16 of Ramesses IX. It contains the confessions of eight men who had broken into the tomb of Sobekemsaf II and a description of the reconstruction of the crime. It throws light on the practices followed at ancient Egyptian courts: eliciting confessions by beating with a double rod, smiting their feet and hands, reconstructing the crime on site, and imprisonment of suspects in the gatehouse of a temple. The document remains an important document for understanding the importance of burial and the afterlife in ancient Egypt as well as crime and punishment practices in Egypt during the 20th Dynasty.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Repatriation and reburial of human remains</span> Ethical considerations in museum management regarding repatriation of human remains

The repatriation and reburial of human remains is a current issue in archaeology and museum management on the holding of human remains. Between the descendant-source community and anthropologists, there are a variety of opinions on whether or not the remains should be repatriated. There are numerous case studies across the globe of human remains that have been or still need to be repatriated.

Night Doctors are bogeymen of African American folklore, with some factual basis. Body snatching from graves and enforced medical experimentation led to the development of African American folklore stories that told of doctors who would abduct, kill, and dissect bodies. The goal of these "Night Doctors" was to further prevent slaves, freedmen, and black workers from leaving for the Northern United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Receiving vault</span> Structure which temporarily stores dead bodies

A receiving vault or receiving tomb, sometimes also known as a public vault, is a structure designed to temporarily store dead bodies in winter months when the ground is too frozen to dig a permanent grave in a cemetery. Technological advancements in excavation, embalming, and refrigeration have rendered the receiving vault obsolete.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resurrectionists in the United Kingdom</span> People employed to exhume bodies during the 18th and 19th centuries

Resurrectionists were body snatchers who were commonly employed by anatomists in the United Kingdom during the 18th and 19th centuries to exhume the bodies of the recently dead. Between 1506 and 1752 only a very few cadavers were available each year for anatomical research. The supply was increased when, in an attempt to intensify the deterrent effect of the death penalty, Parliament passed the Murder Act 1752. By allowing judges to substitute the public display of executed criminals with dissection, the new law significantly increased the number of bodies anatomists could legally access. This proved insufficient to meet the needs of the hospitals and teaching centres that opened during the 18th century. Corpses and their component parts became a commodity, but although the practice of disinterment was hated by the general public, bodies were not legally anyone's property. The resurrectionists therefore operated in a legal grey area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1788 doctors' riot</span>

The doctors' riot was an incident that occurred in April 1788 in New York City, where the illegal procurement of corpses from the graves of the recently deceased caused a mass expression of discontent from poorer New Yorkers that was directed primarily at physicians and medical students.

As anatomy classes in medical education proliferated in the 19th century, so too did the need for bodies to dissect. Grave robbery proliferated, along with associated social discontent, revulsion, and unhappiness. Conflicts arose between medical practitioners and defenders of bodies, graves and graveyards. This resulted in riots. Social legislation was passed in many countries to address the competing concerns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Desecration of graves</span> Act of vandalism to dishonour the dead

Desecration of graves involves intentional acts of vandalism, theft or destruction in places where humans are interred: this includes body snatching. It has long been considered taboo to desecrate or otherwise violate graves or grave markers of the deceased, and in modern times it has been prohibited by law. Desecration is defined as violating something that is sacred.

Wana the Bear v. Community Construction (1982) was a court case decision by the California Court of Appeals that upheld the non-protected status of Native American burial grounds. The decision effectively allowed for the continued mass desecration of Native American burial sites, including looting, since they were not legally protected as cemeteries. The case is often referred to as a display of ethnocentrism in legal decisions.