Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters | |
---|---|
Signed | 15 November 1965 |
Location | The Hague |
Effective | 10 February 1969 |
Condition | 3 ratifications |
Parties | 84 |
Depositary | Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Kingdom of the Netherlands |
Languages | English and French |
Full text | |
Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters at Wikisource |
The Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters, more commonly called the Hague Service Convention, is a multilateral treaty that was adopted in The Hague, The Netherlands, on 15 November 1965 by member states of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It came into existence to give litigants a reliable and efficient means of serving the documents on parties living, operating or based in another country. The provisions of the convention apply to service of process in civil and commercial matters but not criminal matters. Also, Article 1 states that the Convention shall not apply if the address of the person to be served with the document is not known.
For states that are not party to the Hague Service Convention, diplomatic channels are generally used for the service of legal documents. It is generally effected by a letter rogatory, which is a formal request to issue a judicial order from a court in the state where proceedings are underway to a court in another state. This procedure generally requires transmission of the document to be served from the originating court to the foreign ministry in the state of origin. The foreign ministry in the state of origin forwards the request to the foreign ministry in the destination state. The foreign ministry then forwards the documents to the local court. The local court then makes an order to allow for the service. Once service is made, a certificate of service would then pass through the same channels in reverse. Under a somewhat more streamlined procedure, courts can sometimes forward service requests to the foreign ministry or the foreign court directly, cutting out one or more steps in the process.
The Hague Service Convention established a more simplified means for parties to effect service in other contracting states. Under the convention, each contracting state is required to designate a central authority to accept incoming requests for service. A judicial officer who is competent to serve process in the state of origin is permitted to send request for service directly to the central authority of the state where service is to be made. Upon receiving the request, the central authority in the receiving state arranges for service in a manner permitted within the receiving state, typically through a local court. Once service is effected, the central authority sends a certificate of service to the judicial officer who made the request. Parties are required to use three standardized forms: a request for service, a summary of the proceedings (similar to a summons), and a certificate of service.
The main benefits of the Hague Service Convention over letters rogatory is that it is faster (requests generally take two to four months rather than six months to one year), it uses standardized forms that should be recognized by authorities in other states, and it is cheaper (in most cases) because service can be effected by a local attorney without hiring a foreign attorney to advise on foreign service procedures.
The Hague Service Convention does not prohibit a receiving state from permitting international service by methods otherwise authorized by domestic law. For example, a state could allow for service directly by mail or by personal service. States that permit parties to use these alternative means of service make a separate designation in the documents they file upon ratifying or acceding to the Convention.
The Hague Convention provides various modes of process service of documents such as by postal channel or by diplomatic/consular agents, judicial officers, officials or other competent persons. These provisions are covered under Articles 8 to 10 and may or not be allowed by member countries as a valid mode of serving the documents in their territory. The method of serving the documents through a central agency (Article 5) is not optional but is binding on all the member countries. Service through a central agency usually takes a long time: 4 to 12 months. The convention gives relief to the litigants if they have not received certificate of service or delivery from the central agency even after waiting for six months. In such cases, the court may, if it considers that a reasonable time has elapsed, give its judgment. Also, in case of urgency, the court may issue a provisional order or protective measure even before six-month waiting period.
Although the service is free, it may take 4 to 12 months for the central authority to process. The central authority decides which method is to be used. In many cases, a bailiff will be assigned by a local court to serve the documents and mail back the proof of service, but service by mail is also possible. [1]
Service by mail is possible only in states that have not objected to that method under Article 10(a) of the convention and if the jurisdiction where the court case takes place allows it under its applicable law. It is therefore possible in France and the Netherlands but not in Germany, Switzerland, and South Korea, where incoming service is to be effected exclusively through the state's central authority. [2]
In the United States, the interpretation of a provision in Article 10(a) has long been controversial, as the judiciary in some of its jurisdictions contended that service by mail was impossible because the word "send" rather than "serve" was used in the English-language version of the convention. The matter was finally resolved in May 2017 by the US Supreme Court in Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon , bringing the interpretation in line with parties in other US jurisdictions and the rest of the world.
Under the convention, states may conclude different agreements between them that take precedence over the convention. Thus, in the European Union (except for Denmark) other rules are applied instead of the Convention.
As of October 2024 [update] , 84 states are contracting parties of the Hague Service Convention. [2]
State party | Signed | Ratified or acceded | Entry into force |
---|---|---|---|
Albania | — | 1 November 2006 | 1 July 2007 |
Andorra | — | 26 April 2017 | 1 December 2017 |
Antigua and Barbuda | — | 1 May 1985 | 1 November 1981 |
Argentina | — | 2 February 2001 | 2 December 2001 |
Armenia [upper-alpha 1] | — | 27 June 2012 | 1 February 2013 |
Australia [upper-alpha 2] | — | 15 March 2010 | 1 November 2010 |
Austria | 22 November 2019 | 14 July 2020 | 12 September 2020 |
Azerbaijan [upper-alpha 1] | — | 17 February 2023 | 1 September 2023 |
Bahamas, The | — | 17 June 1997 | 1 February 1998 |
Barbados | — | 10 February 1969 | 1 October 1969 |
Belarus | — | 6 June 1997 | 1 February 1998 |
Belgium | 21 January 1966 | 19 November 1970 | 18 January 1971 |
Belize | — | 8 September 2009 | 1 May 2010 |
Bosnia and Herzegovina | — | 16 June 2008 | 1 February 2009 |
Botswana | — | 10 February 1969 | 1 September 1969 |
Brazil | — | 1 November 2018 | 1 June 2019 |
Bulgaria | — | 23 November 1999 | 1 August 2000 |
Canada | — | 26 September 1998 | 1 May 1999 |
China | — | 6 May 1991 | 1 January 1992 |
Colombia | — | 10 April 2013 | 1 November 2013 |
Costa Rica | — | 16 March 2016 | 1 October 2016 |
Croatia | — | 28 February 2006 | 1 November 2006 |
Cyprus | — | 26 October 1982 | 1 June 1983 |
Czech Republic | — | 28 January 1993 | 1 January 1993 |
Denmark | 7 January 1969 | 2 August 1969 | 1 October 1969 |
Dominican Republic | — | 21 March 2024 | 1 October 2024 |
Egypt | 1 March 1966 | 12 December 1968 | 10 February 1969 |
El Salvador | — | 21 March 2024 | 1 October 2024 |
Estonia | — | 2 February 1996 | 1 October 1996 |
Finland | 15 November 1965 | 11 November 1969 | 10 November 1969 |
France | 12 January 1967 | 3 July 1972 | 1 September 1972 |
Georgia | — | 31 May 2021 | 1 January 2022 |
Germany | 15 November 1965 | 27 April 1979 | 26 June 1979 |
Greece | 20 July 1983 | 20 July 1983 | 18 September 1983 |
Hungary | — | 13 July 2004 | 1 April 2005 |
Iceland | — | 10 November 2008 | 1 July 2009 |
India | — | 23 November 2006 | 1 August 2007 |
Ireland | 20 October 1989 | 5 April 1994 | 4 June 1994 |
Israel | 25 November 1965 | 14 August 1972 | 13 October 1972 |
Italy | 25 January 1979 | 25 November 1981 | 24 January 1982 |
Japan | 12 March 1970 | 28 May 1970 | 27 July 1970 |
Kazakhstan | — | 15 October 2015 | 1 June 2016 |
Korea, South | — | 13 January 2000 | 1 August 2000 |
Kuwait | — | 8 May 2002 | 1 December 2002 |
Latvia | — | 28 March 1995 | 1 November 1995 |
Lithuania | — | 2 August 2000 | 1 June 2001 |
Luxembourg | 27 October 1971 | 9 July 1975 | 7 September 1975 |
Malawi | — | 24 April 1972 | 1 December 1972 |
Malta | — | 1 February 2011 | 1 October 2011 |
Marshall Islands | — | 29 July 2020 | 1 February 2021 |
Mexico | — | 2 November 1999 | 1 June 2000 |
Moldova | — | 4 July 2012 | 1 February 2013 |
Monaco | — | 1 March 2007 | 1 November 2007 |
Montenegro | — | 16 January 2012 | 1 September 2012 |
Morocco | — | 24 March 2011 | 1 November 2011 |
Netherlands [upper-alpha 3] | 15 November 1965 | 3 November 1975 | 2 January 1976 |
Nicaragua | — | 24 July 2019 | 1 February 2020 |
North Macedonia | — | 23 December 2008 | 1 September 2009 |
Norway | 15 October 1968 | 2 August 1969 | 1 October 1969 |
Pakistan | — | 7 December 1988 | 1 August 1989 |
Paraguay | — | 23 June 2023 | 1 January 2024 |
Philippines | — | 3 March 2020 | 1 October 2020 |
Poland | — | 13 February 1996 | 1 September 1996 |
Portugal | 5 July 1971 | 27 December 1973 | 25 February 1974 |
Romania | — | 21 August 2003 | 1 April 2004 |
Russia | — | 1 May 2001 | 1 December 2001 |
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines | — | 6 January 2005 | 27 October 1979 |
San Marino | — | 15 April 2002 | 1 November 2002 |
Serbia | — | 2 July 2010 | 1 February 2011 |
Seychelles | — | 18 November 1980 | 1 July 1981 |
Singapore | — | 16 May 2023 | 1 December 2023 |
Slovakia | — | 15 March 1993 | 1 January 1993 |
Slovenia | — | 18 September 2000 | 1 June 2001 |
Spain | 21 October 1976 | 4 June 1987 | 3 August 1987 |
Sri Lanka | — | 31 August 2000 | 1 June 2001 |
Sweden | 4 February 1969 | 2 August 1969 | 1 October 1969 |
Switzerland | 21 May 1985 | 2 November 1994 | 1 January 1995 |
Tunisia | — | 10 July 2017 | 2 February 2018 |
Turkey | 11 June 1968 | 28 February 1972 | 28 April 1972 |
Ukraine | — | 1 February 2001 | 1 December 2001 |
United Kingdom [upper-alpha 4] | 10 December 1965 | 17 November 1967 | 10 February 1969 |
United States [upper-alpha 5] | 15 November 1965 | 24 August 1967 | 10 February 1969 |
Venezuela | — | 29 October 1993 | 1 July 1994 |
Vietnam | — | 16 March 2016 | 1 December 2016 |
Conflict of laws is the set of rules or laws a jurisdiction applies to a case, transaction, or other occurrence that has connections to more than one jurisdiction. This body of law deals with three broad topics: jurisdiction, rules regarding when it is appropriate for a court to hear such a case; foreign judgments, dealing with the rules by which a court in one jurisdiction mandates compliance with a ruling of a court in another jurisdiction; and choice of law, which addresses the question of which substantive laws will be applied in such a case. These issues can arise in any private-law context, but they are especially prevalent in contract law and tort law.
Hague Convention may refer to:
In the U.S. legal system, service of process is the procedure by which a party to a lawsuit gives an appropriate notice of initial legal action to another party, court, or administrative body in an effort to exercise jurisdiction over that person so as to force that person to respond to the proceeding before the court, body, or other tribunal.
The Convention of 5 October 1961 Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents, also known as the Apostille Convention, is an international treaty drafted by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH). The Apostille Convention is intended to simplify the procedure through which a document, issued in one of the contracting states, can be certified for legal purposes in the other contracting states of the Convention. A certification under the Convention is called an apostille or Hague apostille. An apostille is an international certification comparable to a notarisation, and may supplement a local notarisation of the document. If the Convention applies between two states, an apostille issued by the state of origin is sufficient to certify the document, and removes the need for further certification by the destination state.
The Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) is an intergovernmental organisation in the area of private international law, that administers several international conventions, protocols and soft law instruments.
A mutual legal assistance treaty (MLAT) is an agreement between two or more countries for the purpose of gathering and exchanging information in an effort to enforce public or criminal laws. A mutual legal assistance request is commonly used to formally interrogate a suspect in a criminal case, when the suspect resides in a foreign country.
Letters rogatory or letters of request are a formal request from a court to a foreign court for some type of judicial assistance. The most common remedies sought by letters rogatory are service of process and taking of evidence.
The Convention on the Taking of Evidence Abroad in Civil or Commercial Matters—more commonly referred to as the Hague Evidence Convention—is a multilateral treaty which was drafted under the auspices of the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCPIL). The treaty was negotiated in 1967 and 1968 and signed in The Hague on 18 March 1970. It entered into force in 1972. It allows transmission of letters of request from one signatory state to another signatory state without recourse to consular and diplomatic channels. Inside the US, obtaining evidence under the Evidence Convention can be compared to comity.
The Service Regulation, officially the Council Regulation (EC) No. 1393/2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters, is a European Union regulation in the field of judicial cooperation. It allows service of judicial documents from one member state to another without recourse to consular and diplomatic channels.
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1206/2001 of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matters is a European Union regulation in the field of judicial cooperation. It allows taking of evidence from one member state to another without recourse to consular and diplomatic channels. The regulation applies to all the member states of the European Union with the exception of Denmark. The 2015 Danish European Union opt-out referendum, which would have opted-in, was rejected by the people of Denmark.
In international law, documentlegalization is the process of authenticating or certifying a document so it can be accepted in another country.
International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries.
International matrimonial law is an area of private international law. The area specifically deals with relations between spouses and former spouses on issues of marriage, divorce and child custody. In the last 50 years, the States Members of the Hague Conference on Private International Law have attempted to harmonize domestic matrimonial laws and judicial rulings across international borders in these areas.
Mexico is amongst the world's most popular sources and destinations for international child abduction while also being widely regarded as having one of the least effective systems of protecting and returning internationally abducted children within its borders.
The term international child abduction is generally synonymous with international parental kidnapping,child snatching, and child stealing.
A Central Authority is an agency or organization that is designated to play a key facilitating role in the implementation and operation of an international treaty in public and private international law.
The Hague Convention on the International Recovery of Child Support and Other Forms of Family Maintenance, also referred to as the Hague Maintenance Convention or the Hague Child Support Convention is a multilateral treaty governing the enforcement of judicial decisions regarding child support extraterritorially. It is one of a number of conventions in the area of private international law of the Hague Conference on Private International Law in 2007. The convention is open to all states as well as to Regional Economic Integration Organizations as long as they are composed of sovereign states only and have sovereignty in the content of the convention. The convention entered into force on 1 January 2013 between Norway and Albania, with Bosnia-Herzegovina (2013), Ukraine (2013), the European Union, Montenegro (2017), United States (2017), Turkey (2017), Kazakhstan (2017), Brazil (2017), Honduras (2017), Belarus (2018), Guyana (2020), Nicaragua (2020), United Kingdom (2021), Serbia (2021), New Zealand (2021), Ecuador (2022), Botswana (2022), Philippines (2022), Azerbaijan (2023) and Canada following suit. Because the EU acceptance of the convention applies in 26 EU countries, the convention applies in 47 countries worldwide.
Water Splash, Inc. v. Menon, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court decided that the Hague Service Convention permits service of judicial process abroad by mail, provided that the country in which the service takes place has not objected to service by mail, and service by mail is authorized in the country where the litigation is pending.
The Hague Judgments Convention, formally the Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters is an international treaty concluded within the Hague Conference on Private International Law. It was concluded in 2019, and entered into force on 1 September 2023 for the European Union and Ukraine. The convention governs the recognition of judgements in civil and commercial matters.