The Hilton of Cadboll Stone is a Class II Pictish stone discovered at Hilton of Cadboll, on the East coast of the Tarbat Peninsula in Easter Ross, Scotland and now in the National Museum of Scotland. It is one of the most magnificent of all Pictish cross-slabs. Until its felling in a storm in 1674, it faced East - West in a natural amphitheatre about 100m from the shore, which runs NE - SW. Like other similar stones, it can be dated to about AD 800.
Contents
Until the base of the stone was discovered during archaeological investigations in 2001, the original orientation of the stone had been lost. When a copy was erected in 2000 close to the original site, the face with the hunting scene was placed facing West. The discovery of the lower portion of the original stone showed that the face with the hunting scene faced East and that the West face bore a cross with a stepped base. [1] In accordance with convention, the face with the cross will be referred to as the front and the face with the hunting scene as the back.
On the front of the stone was a Calvary cross with figures concerned with Death, Judgement, Heaven and Hell. [2] On the back there is a vine-scroll border (representing the Eucharist) to the left, right and bottom and the Pictish symbols of double disc and Z-rod at the top. Within are three square panels:
- In the top panel are the Pictish symbols of crescent and V-rod above two circular discs containing knotwork.
- The middle panel shows a hunting scene featuring a prominent person on horseback face-on wearing a large penannular brooch. For many years this was regarded as a secular scene with the prominent person a female aristocrat. Modern scholarship [3] identifies the scene as a derivative of the Roman Adventus and the prominent person as Christ. The deer being harried by two hounds at the bottom of the panel references Psalm 42, in which the deer is likened to the soul thirsting for salvation. Psalm 42 was sung on the Easter vigil when catechumens were preparing to be Baptised.
- The bottom panel was broken in half when the stone fell in 1674 and only the top half is in the National Museum of Scotland. It is a scrollwork design featuring triskeles which has been adopted by the neighbouring whisky distillery, Glenmorangie, as its logo. After the base of the stone was discovered in 2001, the central portion of the panel was reconstructed from flakes excavated from the field of debris around the base. This showed that at its centre was a cross similar to that on the east face of the Edderton cross-slab but with equal arms and that the scrollwork design emanates from four points (NE, SE, SW, NW) on a circle surrounding the cross. The panel has now been identified as representing the four rivers of paradise springing from the cross. [4]
In the thirteenth century Hilton of Cadboll Chapel was built 6m to the East of the stone.
In a letter [5] Sir George MacKenzie reported that the wind on 21 December 1674 had been extraordinary and that
it broke a standard-stone that stood as an obelisk near an old church it was high about 12 foot, broad 5 and towards two foot thick
The stone which is in the museum today is the top three-quarters of the original stone: the dark part at the bottom of the image is a copper housing which shows what the bottom quarter would have looked like.
The bottom of the stone, below the break, remained in situ at Hilton of Cadboll and was found during the archeological investigation in 2001. It is now on display at the John Ross Visitor Centre in Balintore. Its cross-face shows a stepped base with bosses (similar to those on the stones at Shandwick and Nigg but with bipartite spirals) while on the reverse face the vine-scroll bottom border is very similar in style to the fragment of a cross-slab known as Tarbat 1. This was found near the site of the Pictish monastery at Portmahomack and is also now in the National Museum of Scotland.
The top three-quarters of the stone had its cross-face erased and a memorial dated 1676 inscribed to Alexander Duff and his three wives. The slab appears never to have been used and was left in Hilton when Duff was later buried in Fearn. Antiquarian interest in the stone began in the late eighteenth century when Rev Charles Cordiner wrote about it in Antiquities and Scenery of the North of Scotland, London, 1780 and illustrated it in Remarkable Ruins and Romantic Prospects of North Britain, London, 1788–95.
The land on which the stone lay was part of the Cadboll estate which was owned by the Macleods of Cadboll. They removed it in the late 1860s to be a feature in the garden of their seat at Invergordon Castle. An early postcard of it there shows it to have been in good condition then. In 1903 Romilly Allen reported it to be weathering rapidly in its exposed position. [6] In 1921 Macleod of Cadboll sold Invergordon Castle and offered the stone together with Tarbat 1 to the British Museum. They were transported there and accepted subject to approval by the Trustees. A rearguard action by the Scottish antiquarian establishment succeeded in deferring the Trustees' acceptance and their releasing Macleod of Cadboll from his gift so that he could redonate the stones to the National Museum of Antiquities of Scotland, which he did.
In the 1990s a campaign to return the stone to its original location having failed, a full-scale copy of the stone was commissioned from local sculptor Barry Grove. During 1998-9 he carved the back and the stone was erected in 2000 close to its original location with the front blank.
Meanwhile during 1998 excavation in the vicinity of the Hilton of Cadboll chapel site was undertaken by Kirkdale Archaeology (Paul Sharman and Jon Triscott) on behalf of Historic Scotland. During this work approximately 40 fragments of carved micaceous sandstone were recovered; the likely origin for these was surmised to be from the lost cross face of the Hilton of Cadboll stone.
Subsequently, in 2001, Historic Scotland commissioned Kirkdale Archaeology (Dave Murray, Stuart Jeffrey, Meggen Gondek, and Angus Mackintosh) to undertake a further excavation. Assisted by Barry Grove, a further 740 carved sandstone fragments, and 122 possibly carved fragments, were recovered. In addition, the missing lower portion of the cross-slab was discovered (by Angus Mackintosh), but left in situ.
Later in 2001 the lower portion of the cross-slab, along with several thousand more carved fragments, was recovered by Glasgow University Archaeological Research Division (GUARD) during an excavation funded by Historic Scotland. The presence and distribution of these fragments suggests that the original intention had been to dig out the entire stone and that, possibly many years after this had failed, defacing of the cross began in situ. In a storm the stone fell towards the chapel, breaking as it fell and leaving the cross-face uppermost. Defacing later continued with the stone now on the ground.
Analysis of these fragments led to the reconstruction of parts of the lost cross-face. Together with the now-lifted lower portion of the slab this enabled Isabel Henderson to use art-historical analysis to infer the iconography of the cross-face. This informed Barry Grove's carving of the front of the modern copy during 2003-5.
Following some controversy, it was accepted that ownership of the lower portion of the original cross-slab lay with the National Museum of Scotland but that it should be displayed in Hilton of Cadboll village hall rather than joining the upper portion in Edinburgh. In parallel with the excavation, Historic Scotland also funded research carried out by Professor Sian Jones of the University of Manchester into the significance of Early Medieval Sculpture to local communities which concentrated on the historical fragmentation and movement of the Hilton of Cadboll monument as well its modern role in the production of meaning, value and place, [7] The excavation and subsequent analysis of the 'biography' of the monument was the foundation of a major monograph published by the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland in 2008. [8] The digital elements of the excavation archive were deposited with the Archaeology Data Service. [9]
Only one skeleton was fully excavated and removed; the others remained undisturbed throughout the duration of the fieldwork. The burials contained various types of pottery and some stones with an unknown glaze on the surface. Several metatarsals were removed for radiocarbon dating, but were returned to the site once testing was complete.
Ten soil samples were taken from the site which appeared to contain charcoal or other evidence about the environment. These samples were subjected to optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating coupled with the analysis of the stratigraphy in order to establish the age and content of the soil. Five distinct levels were discovered in the soil which date from 9th century to present day.
