Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional Chinese | 香港特別行政區基本法起草委員會 | ||||||||||||
Simplified Chinese | 香港特别行政区基本法起草委员会 | ||||||||||||
|
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Basic Law Drafting Committee (BLDC) was formed in June 1985 for the drafts of the Hong Kong Basic Law for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) after 1997. It was formed as a working group under the National People's Congress. The Drafting Committee had 59 members,of whom 23 were from Hong Kong and 36 were from Mainland,mostly the PRC government officials. The Drafting Committee was dominated by Hong Kong businessmen with a share from different social sectors. The decisions of the Drafting Committee on the political structure and legal system of the HKSAR had a great impact on the politics of Hong Kong today.
The creation of the BLDC was announced in Beijing in June 1985 as a working group under the National People's Congress (NPC) of the People's Republic of China. The BLDC was appointed by and reported to the NPC. It had a total of 59 members,36 from the Mainland China and 23 from Hong Kong. [1] Apparently the original figure of 60 was not reached as one of the pro-Taiwan person refused to sit on the committee. [2] The criteria for the Mainland members should be familiar with Hong Kong and some should be legal and constitutional experts,and the Hong Kong members should be patriotic,familiar with the situation of Hong Kong,and should have professional knowledge of particular sector. [1]
The chairman of the drafting committee was Ji Pengfei,the 8 vice-chairmen were Xu Jiatun,firector of the New China News Agency Hong Kong Branch;Wang Hanbin,secretary general of the NPC;Hu Sheng,director of the Party Research Centre of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party;Fei Xiaotong,prominent Chinese anthropologist and sociologist;T. K. Ann,Hong Kong industrialist and member of the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference;Y. K. Pao,Hong Kong shipping tycoon;Fei Yimin,publisher of Ta Kung Pao ,member of the NPC and member of the Legal Commission under the NPC Standing Committee;and David K. P. Li,chairman of the Bank of East Asia. [1] The appointment of Pao,Ann,and Li as vice-chairmen showed the Chinese desire to form a political alliance with the capitalists as a strategy of "political absorption of economics".[ citation needed ] Ann and Pao also represented the Shanghai and Li the Cantonese factions,the two most important business groups in Hong Kong. All of the Hong Kong vice-xhairmen were politically conservative and unlikely to object to Chinese leadership ideas for Hong Kongs future political arrangements. [1]
There were total of 12 tycoons among the 23 Hong Kong members in the drafting committee. Besides the pro-Beijing figures,there were also members from various sectors as part of the Chinese Communist Party's united front strategy and also to show the BLDC represented different interests in Hong Kong. The two Unofficial Members of the Executive and Legislative Council Office (UMELCO) members were Maria Tam and Wong Po-yan from the British colonial establishment,as well as the judge of the Appeal Court Simon Li. [1] Lau Wong-fat,the chairman of Heung Yee Kuk and the vice-chancellors of the two universities were also selected. Rev. Peter Kwong,archbishop of Hong Kong,was appointed to represent religious sector,as well as senior professionals and a leftist trade unionist Tam Yiu-chung of the Hong Kong Federation of Trade Unions. Two liberal figures who had been calling for greater democracy Martin Lee,a barrister,and Szeto Wah,a teacher and head of the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union were also appointed to the BLDC. The inclusion of Lee and Szeto was in line with the united front practice of offering membership to a small number of vocal critics so they could be controlled through the rule of procedures. [3]
15 of the 36 mainland members were officials concerned with various aspects of mainland relations with Hong Kong,11 of them were legal experts. With the number of Mainland members exceeding the number of Hong Kong members by a safe margin,Beijing had overwhelming numerical superiority on the drafting committee. [3]
The BLDC embers were divided in five sub-groups,each group focusing on one area of discussion. [3] The groups were on the Relationship Between the Central Authorities and the HKSAR;Fundamental Rights and Duties of Residents;the Political Structure;the Economy;and Education Science,Technology,Culture,Sports and Religion. [4] The BLDC's Secretariat was located in Beijing. The secretary general was Li Hou,the deputy director of the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office. The two deputy secretaries general were Lu Ping and Mao Junnian,a deputy director of the CCP Hong Kong. A research department was set up within Xinhua Hong Kong to gather comments,models and recommendations on political systems and political development put forward by the Hong Kong public. The heads of the research department were Mao Junnian and Qiao Zhonghuai,both deputy directors of the CCP Hong Kong. [3]
The first meeting of the BLDC was held on 1 July 1985. A plan was tabled by Ji Pengfei of forming a Basic Law Consultative Committee (BLCC) to canvass public opinion on the Basic Law in Hong Kong. The BLCC was formed in December 1985 with many BLDC members holding the key positions of the Consultative Committee,including T. K. Ann who was the Vice-Chairman of the BLDC was selected the Chairman of the BLCC.[ citation needed ]
The political system of the HKSAR was the most hotly debated topic outside and inside the Drafting Committee. The principal issues were the methods of the election of the members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong,the election of appointment of the Chief Executive of Hong Kong,and the relationship between the executive and legislature.[ citation needed ]
The business conservative lobby preferred the Chief Executive to be selected through an electoral college and an executive-led system in which the executive would dominate the political system,while the liberal professionals and grassroots organisations demanded direct elections for the Chief Executive. It was also supported by the members of the Legislative and Executive Councils. [5]
The consultative process by the BLCC stimulated much public discussion and lobbying. During the first consultation period,the BLCC received 73,000 submissions,as well as many public meetings being held and discussions in the media. The response in the second period was smaller as it was taken over by the Tiananmen Square event. [4]
Two groups were formed during the consultation period,the well-funded Group of 89 formed the conservative business people and the Joint Committee on the Promotion of Democratic Government (JCPDG) formed by the about 190 political,community and grassroots organisations [4] and led by liberal activists Szeto Wah and Martin Lee. The two groups organised their support among the public,lobbied for their positions through the consultative process. [4] The conservative business sector preferred a combination of the functional constituency and electoral college while the liberals wanted all or substantial number of members elected directly through universal suffrage. [5] The Legislative and Executive Council members were also able to agree on the "OMELCO consensus" on the electoral system. Additionally,Lo Tak-shing also put forward proposals for a bicameral legislature. [4] Lo's proposals resulted in a dual system of voting in the Legislative Council which strengthened both the executive and functional members. [5]
In 1988,Louis Cha,an influential author and publisher of Ming Pao ,and also the co-convenor of the BLDC panel on constitutional structure proposed his so-called mainstream model which was against the early introduction of direct elections for both Legislative Council and Chief Executive. Cha claimed that it had incorporated all the major common features of the various competing alternatives as advocated by the liberal democratic Group of 190,the conservative Group of 89,and pro-Beijing organs. [6] However,the model had never been listed as one of the alternatives in the BLCC's five-volume consultation report and collection of public opinions on the first draft issued in October–November 1988. Even most of the BLDC Hong Kong members were surprised when Cha hurriedly produced his mainstream model just one day before the BLDC panel meeting. The Hong Kong public was enraged by this highly unusual twist and improper,preemptive procedural strike by Cha. Some regarded Cha's maneuver as a conspiracy and front of the anti-direct election coalition of Beijing,business conservatives and leftist organs. [7]
In December 1988,the Drafting Committee adopted the mainstream model in the draft dealt a near fatal blow to the democratic aspirations of the liberal activists. [6] The pro-democracy groups in Hong Kong held a month-long hunger strike protesting the passage of the mainstream model. [8] The Hong Kong Journalists Association demanded Cha resign from the BLDC in order to avoid a conflict of interest. Local undergraduates publicly burned Cha's Ming Pao outside its editorial premises. [7]
The competing models for political structure in the Basic Law are listed as follows: [9]
Louis Cha's "mainstream" model | T. S. Lo's model | "4:4:2" compromise model | "OMELCO Consensus" model |
---|---|---|---|
Composition of the Legislative Council | |||
Direct elected seats:
| Direct elected seats:
| Direct elected seats:
| Direct elected seats:
|
Functional constituency seats:
| Functional constituency seats:
| Functional constituency seats:
| Functional constituency seats:
|
Electoral college seats:
| Electoral college seats:
| ||
Selection of the Chief Executive | |||
Universal suffrage in 2012 decided by referendum | Universal suffrage in 2003 | Universal suffrage in 2005 | Universal suffrage in 2003 |
The debate was intensified by the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre,which reinforced the liberals' view of the imperative of democracy,while it gave additional ground to conservatives to oppose it,as provocative to the new sovereign. [4] Little attention was paid to the views conveyed through the BLCC when the BLDC met to finalise its proposals,but focused on small number of largely conservative suggestions. [10]
At the early stage of the drafts,some Hong Kong members proposed that the last legislature to be elected should become the first legislature of the HKSAR so called "through train",in the interests of a smooth transition. It was allegedly strongly opposed by Ji Pengfei. However,in November 1988 when the matter was raised by the British in the context of the discussions with the PRC on convergence,the PRC authorities agreed that the Basic Law should not include provisions on the formation of the first legislature and left it to be resolved by the NPC after the two sovereigns had worked out the details. [5] The discussions between the two governments were kept secret,even the BLDC members did not know until the decisions were made by the two governments. [11] The through train was later abandoned by the PRC government after the last British governor Chris Patten's controversial electoral reform in 1994.
At the very beginning of the process,some Hong Kong members requested a clarification of relationship between the Constitution of the People's Republic of China and the Hong Kong Basic Law. Martin Lee proposed that the Basic Law should specify with articles of the PRC Constitution applied to Hong Kong but was rejected by the Mainland members,who considered that the Basic Law should be subordinate to the Constitution but only the NPC could specify which provisions of the Constitution would apply to Hong Kong. Towards the end,it was decided that the NPC should make a formal declaration of the validity of the Basic Law at the same time as it adopted the Basic Law. [12]
The question of residual powers was also raised at the beginning. Szeto Wah proposed an article to effect that Hong Kong would be given authority over all powers not specifically vested in the Central Authorities. The Chinese legal experts resisted it as they claimed that the vesting of residual powers in Hong Kong was inconsistent with its status as a local administrative region within the unitary state. An attempt to stipulate definitively the powers would be vested in Hong Kong was abandoned. No satisfactory basis for establishing the powers of the HKSAR was provided. [13]
The provision for the interpretation of the Basic Law was also debated. Although the Sino-British Joint Declaration provides that the powers of the final adjudication would lie with the HKSAR courts,in the concept of the PRC authorities,adjudication did not include interpretation,which under the PRC Constitution was a responsibility of the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC). Martin Lee argued that the power of interpretation should be vested in the Hong Kong courts,not the NPCSC as the original draft of the Basic Law had provided. A compromise was struck whereby the power to interpret those provisions which concerned the autonomy of the region was to the delegated to the HKSAR by the NPCSC. [13] The Hong Kong courts were also excluded from their purview any executive acts of the central government by a provision in the original drafts. Lee regarded this as a major derogation from the principle of the rule of law. [13]
At the ninth plenary meeting of the Drafting Committee in February 1990,the Committee voted on the Regional Flag and Regional Emblem (Amendment). A two-thirds majority (34 votes) voted in favour of No. 2 design of the Regional Flag and Regional Emblem. It also voted on the finalised Basic Law (Draft). [14]
The drafting process was disrupted after the student protests in Beijing which culminated in the Tiananmen massacre in June 1989. Two members of the Drafting Committee,Louis Cha and Peter Kwong resigned after the PRC government imposed martial law on 20 May 1989. The PRC government expelled Martin Lee and Szeto Wah,the most vocal advocates of democratisation on the committee and founders of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China,after the duo announced their resignations from the committee. [15]
The Third Session of the 7th National People's Congress held on 4 April 1990 adopted Basic Law,including Annex I:Method for the Selection of the Chief Executive,Annex II:Method for the Formation of the Legislative Council,and Annex III:National Laws to be Applied in Hong Kong,and the designs of the regional lag and regional emblem. On the same day,the Basic Law was promulgated by the President of the PRC Yang Shangkun. [16] The Drafting Committee ceased to exist then.
Chairman:Ji Pengfei [17]
Vice-Chairmen:T. K. Ann,Y. K. Pao,Xu Jiatun,Fei Yimin,Hu Sheng,Fei Xiaotong,Wang Hanbin,David Li [17]
Secretary:Li Hou [17]
Deputy Secretaries:Lu Ping,Mao Junnian [17]
All members: [17]
The politics of Hong Kong takes place in a framework of a political system dominated by its quasi-constitutional document, the Hong Kong Basic Law, its own legislature, the Chief Executive as the head of government and of the Special Administrative Region and of a politically constrained multi-party presidential system. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is led by the Chief Executive, the head of government.
The Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) is the permanent body of the National People's Congress (NPC), the national legislature of the People's Republic of China. It exercises the powers of the NPC when it is not in session.
The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is a national law of China that serves as the organic law for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). Comprising nine chapters, 160 articles and three annexes, the Basic Law was composed to implement Annex I of the 1984 Sino-British Joint Declaration.
The chief executiveof the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region is the representative of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region and head of the Government of Hong Kong. The position was created to replace the office of Governor of Hong Kong, the representative of the Monarch of the United Kingdom during British colonial rule. The office, as stipulated by the Hong Kong Basic Law, formally came into being on 1 July 1997 with the handover of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the People's Republic of China. The chief executive is head of the executive branch of the Hong Kong government.
Szeto Wah was a Hong Kong democracy activist and politician. He was the founding chairman of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union and former member of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong from 1985 to 1997 and from 1997 to 2004.
The handover of Hong Kong from the United Kingdom to the People's Republic of China was at midnight on 1 July 1997. This event ended 156 years of British rule in the former colony, which began in 1841.
The 1996 Hong Kong Chief Executive election was held on 11 December 1996 to select the first Chief Executive (CE) of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) which term started from 1 July 1997 after the Chinese resumption of sovereignty over Hong Kong from the British rule. It was selected by the 400-member Selection Committee installed by the Government of the People's Republic of China (PRC). Tung Chee-hwa, a Shanghai-born Hong Kong businessman who was seen being favoured by Jiang Zemin, General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party, was the ultimate winner of the election, defeating former Chief Justice Ti-liang Yang and tycoon Peter Woo with a large margin.
The Hong Kong and Macau Work Office, concurrently known as the Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council (HMO), is an administrative office of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party responsible for promoting cooperation and coordination of political, economic, and cultural ties between mainland China and the Chinese Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau. It was formed in 2023 on the basis of then State Council's HKMAO. Its head office is in Xicheng District, Beijing.
The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Basic Law Consultative Committee was an official body established in 1985 to canvass views in Hong Kong on the drafts of the Hong Kong Basic Law.
The New Hong Kong Alliance was a pro-Beijing conservative political organisation in Hong Kong in the 1990s mostly composed of businessmen and professionals. It was considered the more conservative wing of the Group of 89 formed by established elites in the debate of drafting the Hong Kong Basic Law and democratisation. It proposed the ultra-conservative Bicameral Model for the future political structure. The alliance's key person was secretary Lo Tak-shing who had an eye on the Chief Executive post after 1997, the alliance became less active as Lo's chance of contesting the post got slimmer and it ceased to exist in 1999.
The Liberal Democratic Federation of Hong Kong was a pro-Beijing pro-business and conservative political party in Hong Kong. It was established in 1990, and was composed of mainly conservative businessmen and professionals. It contested in the District Board elections, Urban and Regional Council elections and the first Legislative Council election in 1991 against the liberal United Democrats of Hong Kong (UDHK). It was merged into the Hong Kong Progressive Alliance in 1997. Chaired by Hu Fa-kuang and vice-chaired by Maria Tam and Philip Kwok, the leading figures included Tso Wung-wai, Howard Young, and Daniel Heung.
The Joint Committee on the Promotion of Democratic Government was an umbrella organisation representing various groups of the pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong. It was established on 27 October 1986 by 190 groups and led by the prominent pro-democracy figures Szeto Wah and Martin Lee, two members in the Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee (BLDC), pushing for a faster pace of democratisation in the drafting of the Basic Law of Hong Kong.
The Group of 89 or Business and Professional Group of the Basic Law Consultative Committee was a conservative political pressure group formed by the conservative business and professional elites led by tycoon Vincent Lo in the Hong Kong Basic Law Consultative Committee (BLCC) and Hong Kong Basic Law Drafting Committee (BLDC) during the drafting period of the Hong Kong Basic Law in the late 1980s. Compared to the Group of 190 set up by the pro-democracy groups, it was on the conservative side of debates over the constitutional reform, the Hong Kong Basic Law and the future of Hong Kong.
The 2014–2015 Hong Kong electoral reform was a proposed reform for the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election and 2016 Legislative Council election.
The Group of 190 was a coalition emerged during the discussion of the drafting of the Hong Kong Basic Law and constitutional reform in the transition period of Hong Kong in the 1980s. The coalition was formed in response to the Group of 89 which advocated a more conservative approach to the constitutional reform. It was later transformed into today's pro-democracy camp in the 1990s.
The election for the Hong Kong deputies to the 11th National People's Congress (NPC) was held on 25 January 2008. 36 Hong Kong deputies were elected by an electoral college composed of 1,234 members.
The Decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress on Issues Relating to the Selection of the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region by Universal Suffrage and on the Method for Forming the Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in the Year 2016, commonly known as the 31 August Decision, is a decision made by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC), the national legislative body of the People's Republic of China (PRC) on 31 August 2014 which set limits for the 2017 Chief Executive election and 2016 Legislative Council election in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR).
The election for the Hong Kong deputies to the 13th National People's Congress (NPC) was held on 19 December 2017. 36 Hong Kong deputies were elected by an electoral college composed of 1,989 members.
The 2021 Hong Kong electoral changes were initiated by the National People's Congress (NPC) on 11 March 2021 to "amend electoral rules and improve the electoral system" of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) for its Chief Executive (CE) and the Legislative Council (LegCo), in order to ensure a system in which only "patriots", according to the Chinese definition, govern Hong Kong. The reforms have been widely criticized for their negative impact on the democratic representation in the Hong Kong legislature.
Ng Ka Ling v Director of Immigration was a joint appeal of three cases decided in 1999 by Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal (CFA). Chief Justice Andrew Li, in the Court's unanimous opinion, held that mainland-born children of Hong Kong permanent residents enjoyed the right of abode, regardless of whether one of their parents had acquired Hong Kong permanent residency at the time of birth of the children.