1994 Hong Kong electoral reform

Last updated

The Old Supreme Court Building was the home of the Legislative Council in the final years of the colonial period. HongKongLegcoBuilding.jpg
The Old Supreme Court Building was the home of the Legislative Council in the final years of the colonial period.

The 1994 Hong Kong electoral reform was a set of significant constitutional changes in the last years of British colonial rule in Hong Kong before the handover of its sovereignty to the People's Republic of China (PRC) on 1 July 1997. The reform aimed at broadening the electorate base of the three-tiers elections in 1994 and 1995, namely the 1994 District Board elections, the 1995 Urban and Regional Council elections and the 1995 Legislative Council election. It was the flagship policy of the last colonial governor Chris Patten.

Contents

The reform became a political storm in Hong Kong politics and diplomatic row between China and Britain. Under the opposition of Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the PRC led by Lu Ping, the bill split the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. It was openly criticized by the Hong Kong tycoons and the diplomat-sinologists of the U.K. Foreign Office for breaching the Seven Hurd-Qian letters between British Foreign Minister Douglas Hurd and PRC Foreign Minister Qian Qichen in 1990. The bill secured a dramatic narrow passage after surviving Liberal Party Allen Lee's hostile amendment by one vote 29 to 28 and was eventually passed with the support of the pro-democracy camp. [1] [2] [3]

Background

The decision of transfer of the sovereignty over Hong Kong in 1997 was finalised by the Chinese and British governments on 18 December 1984 in the Sino-British Joint Declaration. The Declaration stated that the Chinese government would resume the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong (including Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories), effective on 1 July 1997, from the British government. Within these declarations, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall be under the direct jurisdiction of the Central People's Government and shall enjoy a high degree of autonomy, except foreign and defense affairs. It shall be allowed to have executive, legislative and independent judicial power, including that of final adjudication.

The colonial government published the Green Paper: the Further Development of Representative Government in Hong Kong on 18 July 1984, decided to carry out democratic reform in Hong Kong. The first indirect Legislative Council election was held in 1985 and direct election was first introduced in the 1991 Legislative Council election, despite the demand of the Hong Kong pro-democracy camp for a fully direct election in 1988 was turned down by the colonial government.

The 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre sparked a great fear towards China among the Hong Kong people. [4] The British Government thus strengthened its resolve to quicken the pace of democratisation, in order to honour its obligation to the Hong Kong people and gracefully retreat from the colony. [5]

In 1992, British prime minister John Major decided that David Wilson should step down as governor of Hong Kong and removed Percy Cradock as foreign policy adviser; they had been criticised by Hong Kong pro-democrats for their appeasement policies toward Beijing. To some observers, these personnel changes signaled that the British government was unhappy with its two prominent officials on Hong Kong affairs and how Sino-British relationship was proceeding. [6]

Chris Patten, the recently defeated Conservative Party chairman was appointed as the 28th governor of Hong Kong and the first politician appointed to the post. The arrival of Chris Patten on 9 July 1992 marked a new phase of the democratic transition. [5]

Proposal

When Chris Patten arrived, the Legislative Council (LegCo) was composed of only 18 directly elected seats from the Geographical Constituencies (GCs), 21 Functional Constituencies (FCs) mostly selected by the powerful elite groups in Hong Kong, 17 members appointed by the governor, 3 ex officio members (namely the chief secretary, attorney general, and financial secretary) and the governor himself as the President of the LegCo.

The electoral method of the 1995 Legislative Council was fixed under the Basic Law, the mini constitution of Hong Kong after 1997, with only 20 directly elected seats from the geographical constituencies, 30 functional constituencies, and 10 seats elected by an election committee. To broaden the democratic structure of LegCo under such a framework, Patten had to find room under the Joint Declaration and the Basic Law.

Chris Patten, the last Governor of Hong Kong who took the leading role in the electoral reform. Chris Patten -2008-10-31-.jpg
Chris Patten, the last Governor of Hong Kong who took the leading role in the electoral reform.

On 7 October 1992 during his inaugural policy address to the Legislative Council, Chris Patten announced his 1994-95 electoral arrangements. The proposal included: [7]

  1. "Single seat, single constituency" measure should be applied in geographical constituency elections including the Legislative Council, Municipal Councils and District Boards;
  2. Lowering the minimum voting age from 21 to 18;
  3. Abolishing all appointed seats on the District Boards and Municipal Councils;
  4. Removing all the restrictions on local delegates to China's National People's Congress to stand for election;
  5. Broadening the franchise of certain existing functional constituencies by replacing corporate voting with individual voting;
  6. A total of 9 Contemporary functional constituency seats should be brought up so as to let about 2.7 million people have the right to vote; and
  7. Introducing an Election Committee of District Board members to return 10 members to the Legislative Council.

In this way, Patten extended the definition of functional constituencies and thus virtually every Hong Kong subject was able to vote for the so-called indirectly elected members of the Legislative Council.

The new nine functional constituencies with much larger eligible electorates that would be created with 2.7 million eligible voters as follows:

  1. Primary Production, Power and Construction
  2. Textiles and Garment
  3. Manufacturing
  4. Import and Export
  5. Wholesale and Retail
  6. Hotels and Catering
  7. Transport and Communication
  8. Financing, Insurance, Real Estate and Business Services
  9. Community, Social and Personal Services

The 2-year PR campaign of the reform was conducted by Michael Hanson, the head of war room of Chris Patten. [1] [2] [3]

Views

PRC government

The Chinese government treated Patten's unanticipated top-down reforms as a tactic by Western countries to subvert its political system incrementally. [8] Prior to the announcement of the reform package, British foreign minister Douglas Hurd had given the details of the proposal to PRC foreign minister Qian Qichen. Beijing warned that some aspects of the plan were in violation of the Basic Law, and the legislature elected in 1995 would not travel through the transfer of the sovereignty in 1997 and beyond, so called the "through-train", as Beijing had promised. They emphasised that any arrangements for the 1995 Legislative Council election should be agreed by both sides beforehand. Beijing saw the Patten proposals as direct confrontation. [7]

Beijing made Patten the principal culprit for the trouble and the Chinese propaganda machine singled him out for attack. The Director of Hong Kong and Macao Affairs Office of the State Council of the People's Republic of China, Lu Ping, labelled Patten as "Sinner of a Thousand Years" (Chinese :千古罪人) at a press conference. [9] In Hong Kong, Xinhua officials used many occasions to criticise Patten. Zheng Guoxiong, Xinhua Hong Kong's deputy director said that:

Patten insisted on confrontation by putting forward his reform proposals. This affected and harmed the prosperity of Hong Kong. Chris Patten did not have any sincerity to cooperate with China. His attitude was thoroughly confrontational, Chris Patten completely ignored the effort and attitude of the Chinese government and he brought harmful effects to the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong. He should be the one who bears all the responsibility. [10]

Zhou Nan, the director of the Xinhua News Agency in Hong Kong called the Patten proposal "triple violations":

More and more Hong Kong people have realised that Patten's political reform package is in serious violation of the Joint Declaration, the Basic Law and the previous agreements reached by Chinese and Britain. They also realised that by walking along this wrong path, Patten has already jeopardised and will continue to jeopardise the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong and a smooth transition. We have already taken and shall take all the necessary measures to maintain the stability and prosperity of Hong Kong, to ensure a smooth transition in 1997 and to protect the long-term interests of Hong Kong people. The only way out for Patten is he should immediately abandon his so-called political reform package and stop playing political tricks. [11]

For the Chinese Communist Party, any significant expansion of the electorate base would render Hong Kong less controllable after 1997. That control had already declined after the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre in which pro-democracy activists won a historic landslide victory in the 1991 legislative first direct elections on a wave of "anti-China" sentiment. [8]

Pro-democracy camp

Martin Lee, leader of the pro-democracy camp and supporter of the electoral reform. Martin-lee-campaign2004.JPG
Martin Lee, leader of the pro-democracy camp and supporter of the electoral reform.

The three pro-democratic parties in the Legislative Council, the United Democrats of Hong Kong (UDHK), Meeting Point (MP), and the Association for Democracy and People's Livelihood (ADPL) mostly supported the Patten proposals, even though the United Democrats complained that the reform was too timid to bring real democracy to the Hong Kong people when the proposals were first announced. [12]

The pro-democratic parties had different suggestions for the details of the electoral methods. However, they also desired political stability and smooth transfer of sovereignty as well as to avoid direct confrontation with the Beijing government.

The United Democrats and Meeting Point (later merged into the Democratic Party in 1994) favoured the single-member system. The United Democrats even called for the abolition of 10 seats of the Election Committee and direct election of the 30 legislators, and expanding the franchise of the functional constituencies to cover non-working women, students and retired persons. [13]

Different from the UDHK's suggestion of each vote for the Election Committee and functional constituencies, the ADPL suggested that each citizen should cast one vote for either the functional constituencies or the Election Committee. To avoid a clash with the Beijing government, the party later joined the Beijing-controlled Preparatory Committee and was criticised by some pro-democracy supporters.

Independent legislator Emily Lau and other some other pro-democracy activists was dissatisfied with the relatively conservative stance of the three political parties. She demanded a more radical blueprint of having a full directly elected legislature installed in 1995. [14]

Meeting Point later abstained in the amendment moved by Emily Lau as it thought any infringement of the Basic Law would enrage the PRC government and result in instability and the dismantling of the installed political structure. Although Meeting Point would have liked increased democracy, it did not want to antagonise Beijing unduly. [13]

Pro-business faction

Allen Lee, the leader of the Liberal Party, was the major opponent to the reform proposals in the Legislative Council. Allen Lee at 71demo 2008.jpg
Allen Lee, the leader of the Liberal Party, was the major opponent to the reform proposals in the Legislative Council.

The pro-business party led by Allen Lee in the Legislative Council, who formed the Liberal Party in 1993, followed Beijing's line of opposing the Patten proposals. The party sought to resolve the Sino-Hong Kong confrontation through negotiations.

The conservative Business and Professionals Federation of Hong Kong, led by tycoon Vincent Lo issued a statement in favour of "convergence" with the Basic Law and against the proposals. [12]

British community

Although British Prime Minister John Major had full support in the Patten's reform package, the former governor of Hong Kong Lord Murray MacLehose, former ambassador to Beijing Percy Cradock, and former Hong Kong chief secretary David Akers-Jones took a public stance against the Patten proposals. They did not want to risk damaging British business interests by antagonising Beijing. [12] Lord MacLehose attacked Patten for spoiling the "cooperative relationship" between Britain and China over Hong Kong and added "such mindless political polarisation cannot be in Hong Kong's interest" on 11 March 1994. Lord Wilson joined MacLehose in a House of Lords debate on 18 May 1994, again criticising Patten's mistake in making China feel "deliberately tricked" over political reform in Hong Kong. [15]

Cradock stood firmly against Patten and criticised him on many occasions, blaming him for damaging the planned road-map which had been endorsed by both the British and Chinese governments. In 1995, Cradock publicly said in an interview that "He [referring to Patten] has made himself so obnoxious to the Chinese", [16] and on a subsequent occasion he described Patten as the "incredible shrinking Governor". [17] [18] Yet, Patten did not remain silent and struck back in a Legislative Council meeting, publicly ridiculing him as a "dyspeptic retired ambassador". [19] From 1992 to 1997, both Cradock and Patten criticised each other on many occasions, putting them on very bad terms.

Public opinions

Amid the Chinese government's threats, public support for Patten's reform declined intermittently and a polarised public emerged. Opinion surveys revealed that although the majority of the public supported the reform, public support for Chris Patten was stifled by the Chinese government's persistent threats to demolish Hong Kong's political structure in 1997 if the reforms were implemented. [8]

Sino-British negotiations

In February 1993, Douglas Hurd wrote to Qian Qichen for proposing negotiation "without preconditions". On 22 April 1993, the two sides reached an agreement that negotiations would start in Beijing. Jiang Enzhu, the deputy foreign minister represented the PRC side, and Robin McLaren, the British ambassador to China, represented the British side. The two sides held seventeen rounds of talk on the electoral arrangements of the 1994 District Boards and 1995 Legislative Council but failed to reach agreement. [20]

The Sino-British negotiations effectively came to an end when Douglas Hurd wrote to Qian Qichen that Britain had decided to present the Patten proposals to the Hong Kong Legislative Council for scrutiny. Qian replied that it was a matter of principle to China that the opinions of the Hong Kong legislature could not supersede the discussion between the two governments and that if the British did indeed put the Patten proposals to the legislature it would mean a breakdown in bilateral negotiations. [20]

Legislative voting

The Electoral Provisions (Miscellaneous Amendments) (No. 2) Bill 1993 which gives effect to the first four proposed reforms, and the Legislative Council (Electoral Provisions) (Amendment) Bill 1994 which gives effect to the last three proposed reforms in the Legislative Council, were passed on 24 February 1994 and 29 June 1994 respectively, [20] despite Lu Ping making phone calls to lobby legislators to abstain or vote against the Patten proposals. [21]

There were fourteen amendments to Patten's bill. [22] Allen Lee's Liberal Party and its allies tried to amend the Patten proposals by proposing the restriction of the franchise in one functional constituency to a maximum of 153 senior executives. Lu Ping instructed his allies on LegCo to support Allen Lee's amendment. Legislator Vincent Cheng, the board member of the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, was pressured by the chairman of the bank Sir William Purves to vote for the Liberal amendment. [23] Nonetheless, the Liberal Party's amendment was defeated by 28 to 29 votes, a mere majority of one vote, on 29 June 1994, with the help of the three ex officio votes. [24]

Emily Lau's amendment of a universal suffrage for the 1995 Legislative Council Election, supported by the United Democrats and ADPL, was also defeated by 20 to 21 votes, with the margin of one vote after four Meeting Point legislators abstained.

The details of the legislative voting on the Liberal Party's amendment, Emily Lau's universal suffrage amendment, and Chris Patten's electoral bill are listed as follows, the name order is in accordance to the LegCo precedence list:

Selection
method
Capacity or
Constituency
MemberPartyLiberal
amendment [25]
Lau
amendment [25]
Patten bill [25]
AP President John Joseph Swaine Independent PresentPresentPresent
EO Chief Secretary Anson Chan Nonpartisan Red x.svg NoRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
EO Financial Secretary Nathaniel W. H. Macleod Nonpartisan Red x.svg NoRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
EO Attorney General Jeremy Fell Mathews Nonpartisan Red x.svg NoRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Allen Lee Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
APAppointed Selina Chow Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
FC Social Services Hui Yin-fat Independent Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
GC Hong Kong Island East Martin Lee United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Finance David Li Independent Green check.svg YesAbsentAbsent
FC Industrial (Second) Ngai Shiu-kit Liberal Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
FC Labour Pang Chun-hoi TUC Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
GC Kowloon East Szeto Wah United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Labour Tam Yiu-chung FTU Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
GC New Territories East Andrew Wong Independent Red x.svg NoRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
FC Rural Lau Wong-fat Liberal Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
FC Architectural, Surveying and Planning Edward Ho Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
FC Real Estate and Construction Ronald Joseph Arculli Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
APAppointed Martin Gilbert Barrow Breakfast AbstainAbstainAbstain
APAppointed Peggy Lam Independent Green check.svg YesAbsentAbstain
APAppointed Miriam Lau Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
APAppointed Lau Wah-sum Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
FC Medical Leong Che-hung Meeting Point/Breakfast Red x.svg NoAbstainGreen check.svg Yes
FC Commercial (First) James David McGregor HKDF Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Urban Council Elsie Tu Independent Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
FC Accountancy Peter Wong Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
GC New Territories South Albert Chan United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Vincent Cheng Independent Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Moses Cheng Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
APAppointed Marvin Cheung Breakfast Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
FC Teaching Cheung Man-kwong United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Financial Services Chim Pui-chung Independent Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
GC New Territories North Fung Chi-wood United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
GC Kowloon West Frederick Fung ADPL Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Timothy Ha Independent Red x.svg NoAbsentGreen check.svg Yes
FC Health Michael Ho United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
GC Hong Kong Island West Huang Chen-ya United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Legal Simon Ip Breakfast AbstainRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Lam Kui-chun Liberal Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
GC Kowloon Central Conrad Lam United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
GC Kowloon Central Lau Chin-shek United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
GC New Territories East Emily Lau Independent Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesRed x.svg No
GC New Territories South Lee Wing-tat United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Eric Li Breakfast Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoGreen check.svg Yes
GC Kowloon East Fred Li Meeting Point Red x.svg NoAbstainGreen check.svg Yes
GC Hong Kong Island East Man Sai-cheong United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Steven Poon Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
APAppointed Henry Tang Liberal Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
GC New Territories North Tik Chi-yuen Meeting Point Red x.svg NoAbstainGreen check.svg Yes
GC Kowloon West James To United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Engineering Samuel Wong Breakfast Green check.svg YesAbsentGreen check.svg Yes
FC Commercial (Second) Philip Wong NHKA Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
GC Hong Kong Island West Yeung Sum United Democrats Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Tourism Howard Young Liberal Green check.svg YesRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
GC New Territories West Wong Wai-yin Meeting Point Red x.svg NoAbstainGreen check.svg Yes
GC New Territories West Tang Siu-tong Independent Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
APAppointed Christine Loh Independent Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
APAppointed Roger Luk Independent AbsentRed x.svg NoRed x.svg No
APAppointed Anna Wu Independent Red x.svg NoGreen check.svg YesGreen check.svg Yes
FC Industrial (First) James Tien Liberal Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
FC Regional Council Alfred Tso LDF Green check.svg YesAbsentRed x.svg No
ResultRed x.svg Fail (28–29)Red x.svg Fail (20–21)Green check.svg Pass (32–24)

Aftermath

The pro-democracy camp experienced the largest victories in the elections following Patten's reform. District Board elections were held on 18 September 1994 under Patten's reform rules. The newly established Democratic Party won the largest block with 75 seats in 18 District Boards. The Democratic Party won 23 of the 59 seats in the municipal elections on 9 March 1995, combining with other democratic parties to control both the Urban Council and Regional Council. On 17 September 1995, the pro-democracy camp won another landslide victory in the fully elected Legislative Council election.

After the Patten proposals were passed, Beijing decided to create the Preliminary Working Committee (PWC) on 16 July 1993. Although it was seen by some that such a body was necessary in order to prepare for the transition of sovereignty, the row over the Patten proposals enabled Beijing to issue a warning that unilateral action would result in the setting-up of a "second stove" and, when it was formed, to say it was an unfortunate product of British confrontation. [26]

The Preliminary Working Committee was dissolved in December 1995 and succeeded by the Preparatory Committee in 1996. The Preparatory Committee was responsible for implementation work related to the establishment of the HKSAR, including the establishment of the Selection Committee, which in turn was responsible for the selection of the first chief executive and the members of the Provisional Legislative Council which replaced the Legislative Council elected in 1995. [27] The Provisional Legislative Council reverted most of the Patten's reform, by resuming appointed seats to the District Councils, Urban Council and Regional Council, reintroducing corporate voting in some functional constituencies, narrowing the franchise of the nine new functional constituencies to about 20,000 voters, and changed the "single seat, single constituency" method to the proportional representation system for the Legislative Council elections. [28]

Despite the eventual reversal of the electoral system, Patten's reform significantly impacted the Hong Kong political landscape by polarising Hong Kong politics.

Timeline

The events related to the electoral reform went on as follows: [29] [30]

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Politics of Hong Kong</span> Political system of Hong Kong

The politics of Hong Kong takes place in a framework of a political system dominated by its quasi-constitutional document, the Hong Kong Basic Law, its own legislature, the Chief Executive as the head of government and of the Special Administrative Region and of a politically constrained multi-party presidential system. The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China is led by the Chief Executive, the head of government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Legislative Council of Hong Kong</span> Legislature of Hong Kong

The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, colloquially known as LegCo, is the unicameral legislature of Hong Kong. It sits under China's "one country, two systems" constitutional arrangement, and is the power centre of Hong Kong's hybrid representative democracy, though popular representation in the legislature has diminished significantly in recent years, along with its political diversity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emily Lau</span> Chinese journalist and politician in Hong Kong

Emily Lau Wai-hing, JP is a politician in Hong Kong who champions press freedom and human rights. A former journalist, she became the first woman directly elected on the Legislative Council of Hong Kong in the 1991 LegCo elections. She has served as Legislative Councillor for the New Territories East Constituency throughout the 1990s and 2000s until she stepped down in 2016. She was chairperson of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong until 2016.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Provisional Legislative Council</span> Hong Kong legislature

The Provisional Legislative Council (PLC) was the interim legislature of Hong Kong that operated from 1997 to 1998. The legislature was founded in Guangzhou and sat in Shenzhen from 1996, until the 1997 handover when it moved to Hong Kong to temporarily replace the Legislative Council of Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2004 Hong Kong legislative election</span>

The 2004 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was held on 12 September 2004 for members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo). The election returned 30 members from directly elected geographical constituencies and 30 members from functional constituencies, of which 11 were unopposed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Functional constituency (Hong Kong)</span> Type of constituency at the Hong Kong legislative assembly

In the political systems of Hong Kong, a functional constituency is a professional or special interest group involved in the electoral process. Eligible voters in a functional constituency may include natural persons as well as other designated legal entities such as organisations and corporations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elections in Hong Kong</span>

Elections in Hong Kong take place when certain political offices in the government need to be filled. Hong Kong has a multi-party system, with numerous parties in the Legislative Council. The Chief Executive of Hong Kong is nonpartisan but has to work with several parties to form a coalition government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hong Kong legislative elections</span>

Legislative elections are held in Hong Kong every four years Legislative Council (LegCo) in accordance with Article 69 of the Basic Law. Legislative elections are held either at the expiry of a four-year term or when the Chief Executive dissolves the legislature and calls a new election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Democrats of Hong Kong</span> Political party in Hong Kong

The United Democrats of Hong Kong was the first political party in Hong Kong. Founded in 1990, the short-lived party was the united front of the liberal democracy forces in preparation of the 1991 first ever direct election for the Legislative Council of Hong Kong. The party won a landslide victory by sweeping 12 of the 18 directly elected seats in the election which shook the political landscape of Hong Kong. In 1994 it was merged with another pro-democracy party Meeting Point to form the contemporary Democratic Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pro-democracy camp (Hong Kong)</span> Hong Kong political faction in favour of universal suffrage

The pro-democracy camp, also known as the pan-democracy camp, is a political alignment in Hong Kong that supports increased democracy, namely the universal suffrage of the Chief Executive and the Legislative Council as given by the Basic Law under the "One Country, Two Systems" framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Democracy in Hong Kong</span> Status of democracy in Hong Kong

Democratic reforms in Hong Kong did not seriously begin until 1984 and has faced significant challenges since 2014. The one country, two systems principle allows Hong Kong to enjoy high autonomy in all areas besides foreign relations and defence, which are responsibilities of the central government. Hong Kong's Basic Law allows residents to vote for local district councillors and directly elect about half of the region's legislators (LegCo) at the time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1998 Hong Kong legislative election</span> Elections in Hong Kong

The 1998 Hong Kong Legislative Council election was held on 24 May 1998 for members of the 1st Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo) since the establishment of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) in 1997. Replacing the Provisional Legislative Council (PLC) strictly controlled by the Beijing government and boycotted by the pro-democracy camp, the elections returned 20 members from directly elected geographical constituencies, 10 seats from the Election Committee constituency and 30 members from functional constituencies, of which 10 were uncontested.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1996 Hong Kong provisional legislative election</span>

The 1996 Hong Kong Provisional Legislative Council election was held on 21 December 1996 for the members of the Provisional Legislative Council (PLC). The 60 members of the PLC was elected by the Selection Committee, a 400-member body elected by the Preparatory Committee for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, a Beijing-appointed body which was responsible for implementation work related to the establishment of the HKSAR.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1995 Hong Kong legislative election</span> Election held in Hong Kong

The 1995 Hong Kong Legislative Council election for members of the Legislative Council of Hong Kong (LegCo) was held on 17 September 1995. It was the first, and only, fully elected legislative election in the colonial period before transferring Hong Kong's sovereignty to China two years later. The elections returned 20 members from directly elected geographical constituencies, 30 members from indirectly elected functional constituencies, and 10 members from elections committee constituency who were elected by all District Board members.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Meeting Point</span> Political party in Hong Kong

Meeting Point was a liberal and moderate Chinese nationalist political organisation and party in Hong Kong formed by a group of former student activists in the 1970s and intellectuals for the discussion for the Sino-British negotiation on the question of Hong Kong prospect in 1983. It was one of the earliest groups in Hong Kong that favoured Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong but wanted a free, democratic and autonomous Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1994 Hong Kong local elections</span>

The 1994 Hong Kong District Board elections were held on 18 September 1994 for all 18 districts of Hong Kong and 346 members from directly elected constituencies. It was the last district-level elections in the colonial period before the handover of Hong Kong in 1997. It was the first elections to be held after the abolition of the appointed seats as proposed by the new electoral arrangements, as the last step of the democratisation by the then Governor Chris Patten before the handover.

The 1988 Hong Kong electoral reform was carried out by the colonial government during 1987 to 1988 as the second stage of the developments of the representative government. Direct elections to the Legislative Council became the most debated issue during the public consultations. Under the strong opposition from the Government of the People's Republic of China, the Hong Kong government consequently turned down the option of the 1988 direct elections and introduced a little change in the government system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2014–2015 Hong Kong electoral reform</span> Proposed electoral reform

The 2014–2015 Hong Kong electoral reform was a proposed reform for the 2017 Hong Kong Chief Executive election and 2016 Legislative Council election.

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Basic Law Drafting Committee (BLDC) was formed in June 1985 for the drafts of the Hong Kong Basic Law for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) after 1997. It was formed as a working group under the National People's Congress. The Drafting Committee had 59 members, of whom 23 were from Hong Kong and 36 were from Mainland, mostly the PRC government officials. The Drafting Committee was dominated by Hong Kong businessmen with a share from different social sectors. The decisions of the Drafting Committee on the political structure and legal system of the HKSAR had a great impact on the politics of Hong Kong today.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2021 Hong Kong electoral changes</span> Hong Kong legislation

The 2021 Hong Kong electoral changes were initiated by the National People's Congress (NPC) on 11 March 2021 to "amend electoral rules and improve the electoral system" of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) for its Chief Executive (CE) and the Legislative Council (LegCo), in order to ensure a system in which only "patriots", according to the Chinese definition, govern Hong Kong. The reforms have been widely criticized for their negative impact on the democratic representation in the Hong Kong legislature.

References

  1. 1 2 Jonathan Dimbleby (director and presenter) (24 June 2007). The Last Governor. Episodes 1-5. BBC Parliament (TV documentary). Later the documentary is compiled into a book, Dimbleby, Jonathan (2018). The Last Governor: Chris Patten and the Handover of Hong Kong. Pen and Sword History.
  2. 1 2 Gittings, Danny (30 October 1994). "I've trodden on a lot of toes". South China Morning Post .
  3. 1 2 Patten, Chris (1998). East and West . Macmillan. p. 65. The seven Hurd-Qian letters, in telegram form, principally concerned the number of directly elected seats in the legislature.
  4. Summers, Tim (2 October 2021). "Economic Statecraft in Anglo-Chinese Relations: Recalling the Hong Kong Airport Negotiations". Diplomacy & Statecraft. 32 (4): 792. doi:10.1080/09592296.2021.1996722. ISSN   0959-2296.
  5. 1 2 Sing 2004, p. 123.
  6. Loh 2010, p. 180.
  7. 1 2 Loh 2010, p. 181.
  8. 1 2 3 Sing 2004, p. 124.
  9. "彭定康:寬宏對待中國罵名". BBC News. 4 April 2002. Retrieved 25 April 2013.
  10. Loh 2010, p. 181-182.
  11. Loh 2010, p. 182.
  12. 1 2 3 Kwok, R. Yin-Wang; So, Alvin Y. (1995). The Hong Kong-Guangdong Link: Partnership in Flux. Hong Kong University Press. p. 262.
  13. 1 2 Sing 2004, p. 145.
  14. Chiu, Stephen Wing-Kai; Lü, Dale; Lui, Tai-Lok (2000). The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong. Hong Kong University Press. p. 43.
  15. McMillen, Donald Hugh; Man, Si-wai. The Other Hong Kong Report, 1994. p. xxiii.
  16. "Sir Percy Cradock dies", RTHK English News, 29 January 2010.
  17. "Sir Percy Cradock", Telegraph, 28 January 2010.
  18. 〈英前駐華大使柯利達病逝〉,《蘋果日報》,2010年1月30日。
  19. OFFICIAL RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS, Hong Kong Legislative Council, 13 July 1995.
  20. 1 2 3 Loh 2010, p. 183.
  21. Dimbleby 1997, p. 258-260.
  22. Dimbleby 1997, p. 254.
  23. Dimbleby 1997, p. 258-259.
  24. Chung, Sze Yuen (2001). Hong Kong's Journey to Reunification: Memoirs of Sze-yuen Chung. Chinese University Press. p.  210.
  25. 1 2 3 "Hansard" (PDF). Legislative Council of Hong Kong. 29 June 1994. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 October 2016. Retrieved 27 April 2013.
  26. Loh 2010, p. 187.
  27. Loh 2010, p. 188.
  28. Sing 2004, p. 158.
  29. Liu, Eva; Yue, S.Y. (1996). Political Development in Hong Kong since the 1980s (PDF). Research and Library Services Division Legislative Council Secretariat.
  30. Chan, Ming K.; Lo, Shiu-hing (2010). The A to Z of the Hong Kong SAR and the Macao SAR. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 11–14.

Bibliography