International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept

Last updated
International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept (ILREC)
ILRE lander.png
Country United States
Soviet Union
Organization NASA and Roscosmos
PurposeCrewed lunar exploration
StatusCancelled in concept phase
Program history
Cost$500 billion over 30 years
DurationStudy: 1993-1994
First flightPhase 1 Flight 1
First crewed flightPhase 1 Flight 4
Launch site(s) Baikonur Cosmodrome
Vehicle information
Crewed vehicle(s)ILREC Piloted Lander
Launch vehicle(s) Shuttle-C Energia

The International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept (ILREC) was a proposed mission architecture under President George H. W. Bush's Space Exploration Initiative (SEI) by Kent Joosten, an engineer at Johnson Space Center. The plan would have used the help of international partners, mainly the Soviet Union, to assemble a lunar base and sustainable lunar transportation service.

Contents

Space Exploration Initiative

On July 20, 1989, the 20th anniversary of the Apollo 11 Moon landing, George H. W. Bush — then President of the United States — announced plans for what came to be known as the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI). In a speech on the steps of the National Air and Space Museum he described plans calling for constructing Space Station Freedom, sending humans back to the Moon "to stay" and ultimately sending astronauts to explore Mars. He proposed not a 10-year Apollo-style plan, but a long-range continuing commitment based on the three above elements, ending with "a journey into tomorrow – a journey to another planet – a manned mission to Mars." The President noted it was humanity's destiny to explore, and America's destiny to lead. He asked Vice President Dan Quayle to lead the National Space Council in determining what was needed to carry out these missions in terms of money, manpower and technology.

A 90-Day Study estimated SEI's long-term cost at approximately 500 billion dollars spread over 20 to 30 years. According to Steve Dick, NASA Chief Historian, the National Academy of Sciences largely concurred with the NASA study, but White House and Congressional reaction to the NASA plan was hostile, primarily due to the cost estimate. In particular, Democratic members of Congress had almost immediate criticism over Bush's plan. Chairman of the Budget Committee, Senator Jim Sasser, stated "The President took one giant leap for starry-eyed political rhetoric, and not even a small step for fiscal responsibility. The hard fact is, this Administration doesn't even have its space priorities established for next year, much less for the next century." His fellow Tennessee Senator Al Gore also was quoted expressing his criticism of Bush's plan, saying "By proposing a return to the Moon, with no money, no timetable, and no plan, President Bush offers the country not a challenge to inspire us, but a daydream to briefly entertain us, a daydream about as splashy as a George Lucas movie, with about as much connection to reality." President Bush sought international partners, but the program was thought too expensive even for an international endeavor.

In the event, execution of the initiative was assigned to NASA, but the initiative did not survive long into the administration of the next president, Bill Clinton. [1]

Vehicles

Automated Cargo Vehicle Unloading Moon Bus Automated Cargo Vehilce Unloading Moon Bus.png
Automated Cargo Vehicle Unloading Moon Bus

The plan would utilize multiple lunar surface rendezvous (LSR), where vehicles would meet on the surface for refueling, rather than Apollo's Lunar orbit rendezvous (LOR). NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory proposed a LSR for Apollo but it was quickly turned down to the amount of technology, such as In situ resource utilization, that would need to be developed. [2]

One-way Automated Cargo Vehicle

The lander would have a rectangular structure which would include fuel tanks and engine blocks towards each end of the vehicle. The middle section would be empty and hold payloads which could be deployed on the surface. They would be capable of delivering 11 tons of payloads. They would be designed and built by NASA and launched by Soviet Energia rockets. They would be assembled in the U.S and shipped to Russia in C-5 Galaxy or Antonov-124/225 transport airplanes. They would then be shipped to Baikonur Cosmodrome and launched there. [3]

ILREC Piloted Lander

ILREC Piloted Lander International Lunar Resource Exploration.png
ILREC Piloted Lander

The crew lander design was a mix between a traditional lander and an orbital capsule. The crew compartment would be derived from the Apollo CM but would lack a forward docking port. It would be mounted to the front of a horizontally oriented three legged lander. The landing legs would fold against the lander's underside inside of a streamlined shroud during ascent aboard a Shuttle-C or another Shuttle-Derived Launch Vehicle like the then under development National Launch System.

The vehicle would have a hatch that would face downward just in front of the landing leg. It would provide access to the surface via a ladder on the leg. On the launch pad this hatch would allow access to the vehicle. The windows would be inset into the hull and allow crew to view the lunar surface. The craft would land and launch using the same belly-mounted thrusters and act as a direct ascent vehicle.

During descent to the lunar surface, the engines would burn Earth oxygen and hydrogen. Soon after lunar touchdown, the lander would be reloaded with liquid oxygen from the automated lunar oxygen plant.

During ascent, the spacecraft would burn Earth-made hydrogen and lunar-made oxygen. [4] The entire lander would lift into a lunar parking orbit and eventually power itself onto a return trajectory.

The crew capsule would separate from the powered stage and orientate itself for reentry similar to the Apollo capsule with its heat shield towards the atmosphere. The capsule would deploy a steerable parasail parachute for a land recovery, potentially at Kennedy Space Center. The lander section would burn up in the atmosphere. [3]

Pressurized Moon Bus rover

The Moon Bus would have been a large rover designed to accommodate 2 passengers for days or weeks at a time. At least two of these rovers would be positioned at the temporary outpost and would act as crew quarters and mobile labs. The 4-person crew would divide into teams of 2, each stationed to one rover, and would depart the outpost on separate missions. The rovers would also be used as early habitation before the outpost was assembled [3]

Energia Rocket ENERGIJA.jpg
Energia Rocket

Energia

Energia (Russian: Энергия, Energiya, "Energy") (GRAU 11K25) was a Soviet rocket that was designed by NPO Energia to serve as a heavy-lift partially recoverable launch system for a variety of payloads including the Buran spacecraft. Control system main developer enterprise was the Khartron NPO "Electropribor". The Energia used four strap-on boosters each powered by a four-chamber RD-170 engine burning kerosene/LOX, and a central core stage with 4 one-chamber RD-0120 (11D122) engines fueled by liquid hydrogen/LOX.

The launch system had two functionally different operational variants: Energia-Polyus, the initial test configuration, in which the Polyus system was used as a final stage to put the payload into orbit, and Energia-Buran, in which the Buran spacecraft was the payload and the source of the orbit insertion impulse.

The rocket had the capacity to place about 100 tonnes in Low Earth orbit, up to 20 tonnes to geostationary orbit and up to 32 tonnes via translunar trajectory into lunar orbit.

The rocket made just two flights to orbit, one each in 1987 and 1988. [5]

Shuttle-C with ILREC Piloted Lander Shuttle-C with ILREC Piloted Lander.png
Shuttle-C with ILREC Piloted Lander

Shuttle-C

The Shuttle-C was a study by NASA to turn the Space Shuttle launch stack into a dedicated uncrewed cargo launcher. The Space Shuttle external tank and Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) would be combined with a cargo module that take the place of the shuttle orbiter and include the Space Shuttle Main Engines. Various Shuttle-C concepts were investigated between 1984 and 1995.

The Shuttle-C concept would theoretically cut development costs for a heavy launch vehicle by re-using technology developed for the shuttle program. End-of-life and space Shuttle hardware would also have been used. One proposal even involved converting the Columbia or Enterprise into a single-use cargo launcher. Before the loss of Space Shuttle Challenger, NASA had expected about 14 shuttle flights a year. In the aftermath of the Challenger incident, it became clear that this launch rate was not feasible for a variety of reasons. With the Shuttle-C, it was thought that the lower maintenance and safety requirements for the uncrewed vehicle would allow a higher flight rate.

In the early 1990s, NASA engineers planning a crewed mission to Mars included a Shuttle-C design to launch six non reusable 80 ton segments to create two Mars ships in Earth orbit. After President George W. Bush called for the end of the Space Shuttle by 2010, these proposed configurations were put aside. [6]

Automated Cargo Vehicle Automated Cargo Vehicle.png
Automated Cargo Vehicle
Temporary Lunar Outpost Layout Temporary Lunar Outpost Layout.png
Temporary Lunar Outpost Layout
Temporary Lunar Outpost Temporary Lunar Outpost.png
Temporary Lunar Outpost

Mission concept

Phase 1

Phase 1 would have been mostly robotic missions that would have set up the liquid oxygen plants for the crew's return trip. Flights 1 and 2 would have assembled the oxygen plant and ISRU equipment as well as small rover-like "carts" that would have carried logistics and fuel cell power. Flight 3 would have brought equipment for the astronauts such as the pressurized Moon Bus and scientific equipment. Flight 4 would have flown a crew of two in the ILREC Piloted Lander and landed them at the outpost. The crew would be one astronaut and one cosmonaut. Their stay would only be a few days long. [3]

Phase 1
MissionLaunch vehicleLanding vehicleCrewObjective
Flight 1EnergiaOne-way Automated Cargo VehicleN/ADeliver the nuclear reactor on a teleoperated cart and the automated liquid oxygen production facility (the latter would remain attached to its lander)
Flight 2EnergiaOne-way Automated Cargo VehicleN/ADeliver teleoperated diggers, regolith haulers, oxygen tankers, and carts for auxiliary fuel-cell power and consumables resupply
Flight 3EnergiaOne-way Automated Cargo VehicleN/ADeliver a pressurized Moon Bus rover and science equipment for future astronauts
Flight 4Shuttle CILREC Piloted LanderTwoDeliver first crew consisting of an astronaut and cosmonaut
Lunar support module and a Moon Bus rover Rover Support Module.png
Lunar support module and a Moon Bus rover

Phase 2

Phase 2 would have set up advanced equipment for further exploration and the first long-term mission. Flights 1-3 would have delivered another Moon Bus rover and scientific equipment, a rover support module with airlocks and habitat space, and a pressurized crew module with logistics mounted on wheels. Flight 4 would have carried a half astronaut half cosmonaut crew of four to the surface. The crew would divide up into two teams with each one stationed at one of the Moon Buses. The mission would last six weeks. [3]

Phase 2
MissionLaunch vehicleLanding vehicleCrewObjective
Flight 1EnergiaOne-way Automated Cargo VehicleN/ADeliver a second pressurized Moon Bus rover and science equipment for future astronauts
Flight 2EnergiaOne-way Automated Cargo VehicleN/ADeliver a rover support module with an airlock and habitation space
Flight 3EnergiaOne-way Automated Cargo VehicleN/ADeliver a cart mounted pressurized space station derived moudle with consumables and other logisitics and scientific equipment
Flight 4Shuttle CILREC Piloted LanderFourDeliver first long-term crew consisting of astronauts and cosmonauts for a six-week lunar stay

See also

Related Research Articles

Spacecraft Vehicle or machine designed to fly in space

A spacecraft is a vehicle or machine designed to fly in outer space. A type of artificial satellite, spacecraft are used for a variety of purposes, including communications, Earth observation, meteorology, navigation, space colonization, planetary exploration, and transportation of humans and cargo. All spacecraft except single-stage-to-orbit vehicles cannot get into space on their own, and require a launch vehicle.

Space Shuttle program 1972–2011 United States human spaceflight program

The Space Shuttle program was the fourth human spaceflight program carried out by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), which accomplished routine transportation for Earth-to-orbit crew and cargo from 1981 to 2011. Its official name, Space Transportation System (STS), was taken from a 1969 plan for a system of reusable spacecraft of which it was the only item funded for development. It flew 135 missions and carried 355 astronauts from 16 countries, many on multiple trips.

Constellation program Cancelled 2005–2010 NASA human spaceflight program

The Constellation program was a crewed spaceflight program developed by NASA, the space agency of the United States, from 2005 to 2009. The major goals of the program were "completion of the International Space Station" and a "return to the Moon no later than 2020" with a crewed flight to the planet Mars as the ultimate goal. The program's logo reflected the three stages of the program: the Earth (ISS), the Moon, and finally Mars—while the Mars goal also found expression in the name given to the program's booster rockets: Ares. The technological aims of the program included the regaining of significant astronaut experience beyond low Earth orbit and the development of technologies necessary to enable sustained human presence on other planetary bodies.

The Apollo Applications Program (AAP) was created as early as 1966 by NASA headquarters to develop science-based human spaceflight missions using hardware developed for the Apollo program. AAP was the ultimate development of a number of official and unofficial Apollo follow-on projects studied at various NASA labs. However, the AAP's ambitious initial plans became an early casualty when the Johnson Administration declined to support it adequately, partly in order to implement its Great Society set of domestic programs while remaining within a $100 billion budget. Thus, Fiscal Year 1967 ultimately allocated $80 million to the AAP, compared to NASA's preliminary estimates of $450 million necessary to fund a full-scale AAP program for that year, with over $1 billion being required for FY 1968. The AAP eventually led to Skylab, which absorbed much of what had been developed under Apollo Applications.

Moon landing Arrival of a spacecraft on the surface of the Moon

A Moon landing is the arrival of a spacecraft on the surface of the Moon. This includes both crewed and robotic missions. The first human-made object to touch the Moon was the Soviet Union's Luna 2, on 13 September 1959.

The Ride Report is the informal name of the report titled NASA Leadership and America's Future in Space: A Report to the Administrator. In 1986, a task force under the leadership of Sally Ride was asked to formulate a new strategy for NASA. The report was issued in 1987.

Shuttle-derived vehicle Spaceflight concept

Shuttle-derived vehicle (SDV) is a term describing one of an array of concepts that have been developed for building space launch vehicles and spacecraft using the already developed components, technology, and infrastructure of the Space Shuttle program.

Exploration Systems Architecture Study NASA study

The Exploration Systems Architecture Study (ESAS) is the official title of a large-scale, system level study released by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in November 2005 in response to American president George W. Bush's announcement on January 14, 2004 of his goal of returning astronauts to the Moon and eventually Mars — known as the Vision for Space Exploration. The Constellation Program was cancelled in 2010 by the Obama Administration and replaced with the Space Launch System, later renamed as the Artemis Program in 2017 under the Trump Administration.

Altair (spacecraft) Planned lander spacecraft component of NASAs cancelled Project Constellation

The Altair spacecraft, previously known as the Lunar Surface Access Module or LSAM, was the planned lander spacecraft component of NASA's cancelled Constellation program. Astronauts would have used the spacecraft for landings on the Moon, which was intended to begin around 2019. The Altair spacecraft was planned to be used both for lunar sortie and lunar outpost missions. On February 1, 2010, U.S. President Barack Obama announced a proposal to cancel the Constellation program, to be replaced with a re-scoped program, effective with the U.S. 2011 fiscal year budget.

Ares V Canceled NASA rocket key to Project Constellation

The Ares V was the planned cargo launch component of the cancelled NASA Constellation program, which was to have replaced the Space Shuttle after its retirement in 2011. Ares V was also planned to carry supplies for a human presence on Mars. Ares V and the smaller Ares I were named after Ares, the Greek god of war.

Outline of space exploration Overview of and topical guide to space exploration

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to space exploration.

NASA lunar outpost concepts Concepts for an extended human presence on the Moon

NASA has made many concepts of moonbases for achieving a permanent presence of humans on the Moon. The American government agency requested an increase in the 2020 budget of $1.6 billion, in order to make another crewed mission to the Moon by 2025, followed by a sustained presence on the Moon by 2028.

Space Exploration Initiative 1989-1993 program outlining NASAs long-term vision for crewed interplanetary missions

The Space Exploration Initiative was a 1989–1993 space public policy initiative of the George H. W. Bush administration.

Lunar rover Vehicle that travels on the moons surface

A lunar rover or Moon rover is a space exploration vehicle designed to move across the surface of the Moon. The Apollo Program's Lunar Roving Vehicle was driven on the Moon by members of three American crews, Apollo 15, 16, and 17. Other rovers have been partially or fully autonomous robots, such as the Soviet Union's Lunokhods and the Chinese Yutus. Three countries have had operating rovers on the Moon: the Soviet Union, the United States and China. An Indian mission failed while Japan and Greece currently have planned missions.

Super heavy-lift launch vehicle Launch vehicle capable of lifting more than 50 tonnes of payload into low earth orbit

A super heavy-lift launch vehicle can lift to low Earth orbit more than 50 metric tons (110,000 lb) by United States (NASA) classification or 100 metric tons (220,000 lb) by Russian classification. It is the most capable launch vehicle classification by mass to orbit, succeeding the heavy-lift launch vehicle classification. Crewed lunar and interplanetary missions are often developed around these launch vehicles' payload capacity.

Artemis 3 Third orbital flight of the Artemis program

Artemis 3 is planned as the first crewed Moon landing mission of the Artemis program and the first crewed flight of the Starship HLS lander. Scheduled for launch in 2025, Artemis 3 is planned to be the second crewed Artemis mission and the first crewed lunar landing since Apollo 17 in 1972.

Artemis program NASA program to return humans to the Moon following the Apollo program

The Artemis program is a human spaceflight program led by NASA to explore the Moon, aiming for its first touchdown on the lunar south pole by 2025. If successful, the Artemis program will perform the first crewed lunar landing mission since Apollo 17 in December 1972, the final crewed expedition of the Apollo program. The program is expected to be a multinational collaborative project between governmental space agencies and private spaceflight companies.

First Lunar Outpost 1989 Bush administration proposal to place humans on the Moon

First Lunar Outpost was a proposal for a crewed lunar mission that would have launched sometime in the 2010s. It was part of George H. W. Bush's Space Exploration Initiative. The main purpose of the proposal was to offer a much cheaper alternative to NASA's 90-day study from 1989 by a factor of US$30 billion. Although it did not gather much mainstream attention, NASA dedicated much time to assembling a very detailed and thorough proposal. However, the entire Space Exploration Initiative was cancelled soon after the proposal's completion, and NASA had to close the Office of Space Exploration in March of 1993.

References

  1. "Space Exploration Initiative". history.nasa.gov. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  2. "Spaceflight History: SEI Swan Song: International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept (1993)". Spaceflight History. Retrieved 2019-11-29.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Spaceflight History: SEI Swan Song: International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept (1993)". Spaceflight History. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  4. Portree, David S. F. (2013-07-02). "International Lunar Resources Exploration Concept (1993)". Wired. ISSN   1059-1028 . Retrieved 2019-12-04.
  5. "Energia". www.russianspaceweb.com. Retrieved 2019-11-28.
  6. "Shuttle C". www.astronautix.com. Archived from the original on July 12, 2016. Retrieved 2019-11-28.