Lake Superior and Ishpeming 23

Last updated
Lake Superior and Ishpeming 23
M&HM 23 in storage in Marquette, Michigan.jpg
No. 23 sitting at the Marquette and Huron Mountain Railroad yard in Marquette, Michigan, in June 1975
Type and origin
Power typeSteam
Builder American Locomotive Company (Pittsburg Works)
Serial number46939
Build dateJanuary 1910
RebuilderLake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad
Rebuild date1928
Specifications
Configuration:
   Whyte 2-8-0
   UIC 1'D'h
Gauge 4 ft 8+12 in (1,435 mm)
Driver dia.New: 48 in (1,200 mm)
Now: 55 in (1,400 mm)
Adhesive weight 168,000 lb (76,000 kg)
Loco weight189,360 lb (85,890 kg)
Tender weight125,700 lb (57,000 kg)
Total weight315,060 lb (142,910 kg)
Fuel type Coal
Fuel capacity10.8 t (10.6 long tons; 11.9 short tons)
Water cap.8,700 US gal (33,000 L; 7,200 imp gal)
Boiler pressure200 psi (1,400 kPa)
Cylinders Two, outside
Cylinder size
  • New: 20 in × 28 in (510 mm × 710 mm)
  • Now: 22 in × 28 in (560 mm × 710 mm)
Valve gear
Performance figures
Tractive effort 42,000 lbf (190,000 N)
Career
Operators
Class
  • New: C-5
  • Now: SC-4
Numbers
  • LS&I 9
  • LS&I 23
  • M&HM 23
Retired
  • September 1962 (revenue service)
  • August 1966 (1st excursion service)
  • 1984 (2nd excursion service)
Restored
  • July 2, 1963 (1st excursion service)
  • 1973 (2nd excursion service)
Current owner Empire State Railway Museum
DispositionUndergoing cosmetic restoration
References: [1] [2]

Lake Superior and Ishpeming 23 is a SC-4 class 2-8-0 "Consolidation" type steam locomotive, built by the American Locomotive Company's (ALCO) Pittsburg Works in January 1910 for the Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad (LS&I) in Upper Michigan. The locomotive was originally numbered as No. 9, but it was renumbered to No. 23 in 1924. It was used for pulling carloads of iron ore, as well as some passenger trains on branch lines, until 1962. In 1963, it was purchased by the Marquette and Huron Mountain tourist railroad, who used it to pull their excursion trains between Marquette and Big Bay.

Contents

After the M&HM was shut down in 1984, No. 23 was sold to the Empire State Railway Museum in Phoenicia, New York, where it was put on static display. In 1998, ESRM announced that they would restore the locomotive to operating condition and they began the rebuilding process at the Catskill Mountain Railroad's (CMRR) Kingston yard site, but was later decided to cosmetically restore it instead. As of 2026, No. 23 is still undergoing its cosmetic restoration at the ESRM's location in Phoenicia.

History

Design and upgrades

In 1909, the Lake Superior and Ishpeming Railroad (LS&I) authorized to sell off four of their older steam locomotives and replace them with new 2-8-0 locomotives. [3] [2] The following year, five new C-5 class 2-8-0s (Nos. 9–13) were constructed for the LS&I by the American Locomotive Company's (ALCO) Pittsburg Works, at a cost of $14,335 each. [3] [4] [5] [a] The C-5s were initially designed with outside Pilliod valve gear, 48-inch (1,200 mm) diameter driving wheels, and 20-by-28-inch (510 mm × 710 mm) cylinders, and they were rated at around 34,000 pounds-force (150 kN) of tractive effort. [3] [5] [6]

The C-5s were also built with saturated keyhole fireboxes that were placed in between their rear sets of driving wheels, resulting in their poor abilities to produce steam. [3] In 1924, the LS&I was reincorporated after merging with the Munising, Marquette and Southeastern Railway (MM&SE), and the former retainted the latter's fleet of three C-5s, expanding the class total to eight. [7] [8] [9] With almost all locomotives on the LS&I's expanded roster being renumbered, the C-5s were renumbered as 18–25. [4] [8]

Between 1928 and 1934, almost all the C-5 class locomotives, with the sole exception of No. 25, were sent to the LS&I's Presque Isle locomotive shops to be extensively rebuilt and modified to improve their performance. [5] [8] Their cylinder saddles were replaced by ones with superheated cylinders and piston valves; their boilers received superheaters and were raised higher above the frame; their fireboxes were widened and received Nicholson thermic siphons; and feedwater heaters were installed. [2] [8] The rebuilt C-5s were reclassified as SC-4s, and their tractive effort was raised to around 42,000 pounds (19 tonnes). [2] [5] Their overall reliability was also significantly improved, and they became favored by LS&I crews. [8]

Revenue service

No. 23 was the very first C-5 class locomotive to be built, and it was originally numbered 9. [6] [10] No. 9 was primarily assigned in its early years to pull the LS&I's mixed freight trains, and it was occasionally used to pull iron ore trains. [3] As a saturated locomotive, No. 9 was prone to stalling whenever the locomotive would climb a grade, or when the weight of its train exceeded its pulling power. [3] [6] On one occasion, the C-5 participated in a locomotive "tug of war" publicity session, but it lost to B-4 class 2-8-0 No. 8. [3] [11] Following the LS&I's merger with the MM&SE in 1924, No. 9 was renumbered to 23. [8] [10]

In 1928, No. 23 became the first of seven C-5 locomotives to be rebuilt and modified as SC-4s at the LS&I's Presque Isle shops. [5] [8] Following its rebuild, the locomotive was primarily reassigned to switch hopper cars at iron ore mines and to pull freight and logging trains on branch lines. [5] [12] Throughout the 1950s, the LS&I gradually dieselized their roster, but all seven of the SC-4s, due to their reliability, remained on the roster after the railroad retired their other steam locomotive classes, being used as switchers and to thaw frozen iron ore. [2] [5] [12] The SC-4s were retired in September 1962, when the railroad discontinued their commercial steam operations. [5] [12] [13]

Marquette and Huron Mountain Railroad

In December 1958, the LS&I petitioned to abandoned their 23.74-mile (38.21 km) Big Bay Branch between Marquette and Big Bay, since it had no customers left—having no trains run since November 1957—but a group lead by public accountant John A. Zerbal entered negotiations to purchase the line with a desire to revitalize it for shortline logging and tourist passenger trains. [2] [14] Willing to utilize former LS&I equipment for the line, Zerbal purchased No. 23, along with fellow SC-4 No. 19 and some rolling stock, in early 1963. [2] [15] [14] On July 2 of the same year, the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) approved the sale of the Big Bay Branch, and No. 23 subsequently pulled the M&HM's first trains. [15] [14] By August, the railroad acquired the rest of the LS&I's retired steam locomotives (SC-4s Nos. 18, 20, 21, and 22; SC-3 No. 29; and SC-1s Nos. 32, 33, 34, and 35) and No. 22 was subsequently placed into service on the M&HM alongside Nos. 19 and 23. [15] [14] Initially, the three SC-4s pulled freight and work trains to refurbish the line, which involved vegetation removal and tie replacements, and then tourist operations officially commenced in the summer of 1964. [14] [16] [17]

The M&HM's goal was to operate all of their locomotives and to eventually construct a major complex of resort attractions in Big Bay that would consist of various outdoor activities. [2] [15] The M&HM never achieved their ambitious goal, due to overestimated returns from revenue freight runs and overestimated passenger ridership. [14] [18] In August 1966, the M&HM only ran one excursion before they suspended operations, and Nos. 23, 22, and 19 were moved to a field with the rest of the railroad's locomotives. [15] [17] [18] The M&HM subsequently went through a multi-year hiatus while Zerbal had the railroad's management issues reorganized, [17] and almost all the SC-1s, which were too heavy for the line, were gradually sold off to help recoup lost revenue. [19] In 1972, the M&HM resumed their operations with shortened running dates and diesel power, and the following year, No. 23 was restored to operating condition. [15] [14] [18]

The M&HM attracted some certified steam locomotive mechanics from the LS&I, the Soo Line, and the Chicago and North Western (C&NW) to work for the tourist line, and they were allowed to maintain No. 23 inside a Soo Line roundhouse during winter months. [15] [14] The M&HM also shortened their operations from 23 miles (37 kilometres) to 8 miles (13 kilometres), since Zerbal believed passengers would not enjoy traveling on a long-distance tourist train. [15] [14] [17] On April 13, 1984, Zerbal died shortly before a tax deadline. [15] Many of the M&HM's workforces, including chief mechanical officer Art Anderson, tried to save the railroad, but the property was too remote and not profitable enough. [15] [20] The M&HM's operations permanently closed down by December, and all of the equipment was sold off at an auction, on January 14, 1985. [14] [20]

Empire State Railway Museum

During the auction, No. 23 was purchased by the Empire State Railway Museum (ESRM) at a bid of $10,000. [20] The ESRM moved No. 23 to their location in Phoenicia, New York, where it received a partial cosmetic restoration and was put on static display near a depot owned by the Catskill Mountain Railroad (CMRR), who was looking into expanding their own tourist operations. In February 1998, the ESRM announced that they would partner with the CMRR to restore No. 23 to operating condition for use as the centerpiece of their operations. [21] [22] [23] Overtime, as available volunteer labor at the ESRM dwindled, and while Ulster County began attempts to end the CMRR's lease of the right-of-way to redevelop it into a trail, the project on No. 23 was relegated to a cosmetic restoration. [21] As of 2026, No. 23's cosmetic restoration is still underway at the ESRM's location in Phoenicia. [21]

See also

Notes

  1. The location was known as Pittsburg at the time these locomotives were built from 1891 till 1911.

References

  1. Durocher (1958), p. 31
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Zahrt (2009), p. 46
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Durocher (1958) , p. 13
  4. 1 2 Schauer (2015) , p. 21
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Schauer (2015) , pp. 21, 22
  6. 1 2 3 Durocher (1958) , p. 28
  7. Durocher (1958) , p. 20
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Durocher (1958) , p. 24
  9. Schauer (2015) , p. 6
  10. 1 2 Durocher (1958) , p. 30
  11. Durocher (1958) , p. 11
  12. 1 2 3 Schauer (2015) , p. 18
  13. "Railroad Historical Almanac" (PDF). Railroad Historical Almanac: 162. Retrieved March 9, 2026.
  14. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Schauer (2015) , p. 34
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Zahrt (2009) , p. 47
  16. Schauer (2015) , p. 37
  17. 1 2 3 4 Stowe, J. A. (April 1968). "The Case for the Steam Tourist Railroad" . Trains. Vol. 28, no. 6. Kalmbach Publishing. pp. 42–43. Retrieved February 10, 2024.
  18. 1 2 3 Schauer (2015) , p. 38
  19. Schauer (2015) , p. 31
  20. 1 2 3 Zahrt (2009) , p. 48
  21. 1 2 3 Schauer (2015) , p. 28
  22. "Ulster County Integrated Advance Train Detection and Arrival Prediction Implementation Plan" (PDF). Ulster County Integrated Advance Train Detection and Arrival Prediction Implementation Plan. April 18, 2008. p. 16. Retrieved March 9, 2026.
  23. "The Semaphore" (PDF). The Semaphore. February 1998. p. 11. Retrieved March 10, 2026.

Bibliography