Letter to Chesterfield

Last updated

Illustration of Dr Johnson leaving Lord Chesterfield's residence. Johnson letters.jpg
Illustration of Dr Johnson leaving Lord Chesterfield's residence.

The Letter to Chesterfield (February 1755) was Samuel Johnson's response to what some believed to be Lord Chesterfield's opportunistic endorsement of his A Dictionary of the English Language . Although Chesterfield was patron of the Proposal for the Dictionary, he made no moves to further the progress of the Dictionary until seven years after his original investment into the project. Suddenly, Chesterfield wrote two "puff" pieces to promote the Dictionary, which prompted Johnson to write a letter accusing Chesterfield of only providing help when it was least needed.

Contents

Some claim that the letter caused a minor furore in the contemporary literary world when Johnson made it public and it has been the subject of critical comment ever since; it has been described as literature's "declaration of independence". [1] [2] However, Chesterfield's reaction to the letter was quite different, and he praised Johnson's intellect and ability to write after reading it for the first time. Johnson could not believe that Chesterfield would ever react favourably towards the letter, and it was not until years later that Chesterfield and Johnson would finally reconcile.

Background

Johnson began work on his Dictionary in 1746 and although the consortium of booksellers that commissioned the work provided him with £1,575 as expenses, Johnson also sought subscriptions from literary patrons among the aristocracy. [3] One of those to receive a request for patronage was Lord Chesterfield, a noted patron of the arts. Johnson visited Chesterfield but, according to Johnson's account, he was kept waiting for a long time and was treated dismissively by Chesterfield when they eventually met. Chesterfield sent Johnson £10 but offered no greater support to Johnson through the seven further years it took him to compile the Dictionary. A degree of genteel mutual antipathy thereafter existed between the two men, Chesterfield regarding Johnson as a "respectable Hottentot, who throws his meat anywhere but down his throat" and as "uncouth in manners". [4] Johnson, in turn, was disparaging of both Chesterfield's nobility and his intellect: "This man, I thought, had been a Lord among wits; but I find he is only a wit among Lords." [4]

The Letter

After seven years from first meeting Johnson to go over the work, Chesterfield wrote two anonymous essays in The World that recommended the Dictionary. [5] He complained that the English language was lacking structure and argued:

"We must have recourse to the old Roman expedient in times of confusion, and chose a dictator. Upon this principle, I give my vote for Mr Johnson to fill that great and arduous post." [6]

However, Johnson did not appreciate the tone of the essay, and he felt that Chesterfield did not complete his job as the work's patron. [6] In a letter, Johnson explained his feelings about the matter:

"Seven years, my lord, have now past since I waited in your outward rooms or was repulsed from your door, during which time I have been pushing on my work through difficulties of which it is useless to complain, and have brought it at last to the verge of publication without one act of assistance, one word of encouragement, or one smile of favour. Such treatment I did not expect, for I never had a patron before. . . . Is not a patron, my lord, one who looks with unconcern on a man struggling for life in the water, and when he has reached ground, encumbers him with help? The notice which you have been pleased to take of my labours, had it been early, had been kind: but it has been delayed till I am indifferent and cannot enjoy it; till I am solitary and cannot impart it; till I am known and do not want it." [7]

Chesterfield was not offended by the letter, but instead impressed by the language. [8] After receiving it, he displayed it on a table for visitors to read, and, according to Robert Dodsley, said "This man has great powers" and then he "pointed out the severest passages, and observed how well they were expressed." [8] Adams told Johnson what was said, and Johnson responded, "That is not Lord Chesterfield; he is the proudest man this day", to which Adams responded, "No, there is one person at least as proud; I think, by your own account, you are the prouder man of the two." [8] Johnson, finishing, said, "But mine, was defensive pride." [8] Years later, the two reconciled, and a letter from Chesterfield "melted the Heart of the Writer of that epistolary Philippic." [9]

Critical commentary

The Letter to Chesterfield has continued to be commented on by some of the most noted critics and authors since its publication to the present day. In 1853, Thomas Carlyle, in an early biographical essay on Johnson proclaimed its significance: [10]

Listen, once again, to that far-famed Blast of Doom, proclaiming into the ear of Lord Chesterfield, and, through him, of the listening world, that patronage should be no more!

— Thomas Carlyle, Samuel Johnson

In the twentieth century, Alvin Kernan [11] wrote that the Letter to Chesterfield

...still stands as the Magna Carta of the modern author, the public announcement that the days of courtly letters were at last ended, that the author was the true source of his work and that he and it were no longer dependent on patron or the social system he represented.

— Alvin Kernan, Samuel Johnson and the Impact of Print

However, to think that the letter was written out of anger or a response to neglect would be wrong. [12] Instead, they claim that Johnson was forced into a fake status "of a man who was soon to declare, in a Preface perhaps already written, that his great work had been written, without the 'patronage of the great." [13] In essence, an outsider would think that Chesterfield was patronising the work continually. [14]

Notes

  1. ↑ Sobran, Joseph (22 June 2000). "Dr. Johnson, Radical" . Retrieved 19 September 2007.
  2. ↑ Wishna, Victor (October 2005). "Words. Words. Words". National Endowment for the Humanities. Archived from the original on 29 May 2010. Retrieved 19 September 2007.
  3. ↑ Kirsch, Adam (December 2004). "The Hack as Genius". Harvard Magazine. Archived from the original on 3 October 2007. Retrieved 19 September 2007.
  4. 1 2 Stephen, Leslie (1878). Samuel Johnson . Retrieved 20 September 2007.
  5. ↑ Lane p. 118
  6. 1 2 Lane p. 121
  7. ↑ Johnson Letters No. 56
  8. 1 2 3 4 Bate p. 257
  9. ↑ Sledd and Kolb pp. 102–103
  10. ↑ Carlyle, Thomas (1853). Samuel Johnson. Chapman and Hall. pp.  59 . Retrieved 20 September 2007. carlyle chesterfield johnson blast of doom.
  11. ↑ Kernan, Alvin (1987). Samuel Johnson and the Impact of Print. Princeton. p. 105. ISBN   0-691-01475-2 . Retrieved 20 September 2007.
  12. ↑ Sledd and Kolb p. 107
  13. ↑ Sledd and Kolb p. 108
  14. ↑ Sledd and Kolb pp. 107–109

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Samuel Johnson</span> English writer and lexicographer (1709–1784)

Samuel Johnson, often called Dr Johnson, was an English writer who made lasting contributions as a poet, playwright, essayist, moralist, literary critic, sermonist, biographer, editor, and lexicographer. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography calls him "arguably the most distinguished man of letters in English history".

<i>A Dictionary of the English Language</i> 1755 dictionary by Samuel Johnson

A Dictionary of the English Language, sometimes published as Johnson's Dictionary, was published on 15 April 1755 and written by Samuel Johnson. It is among the most influential dictionaries in the history of the English language.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Carlyle</span> Scottish essayist, historian and philosopher (1795–1881)

Thomas Carlyle was a British essayist, historian, and philosopher from the Scottish Lowlands. A leading writer of the Victorian era, he exerted a profound influence on 19th-century art, literature, and philosophy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Wilson Croker</span> 19th-century Anglo-Irish politician and statesman

John Wilson Croker was an Anglo-Irish statesman and author.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philip Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield</span> 18th-century British statesman and man of letters

Philip Dormer Stanhope, 4th Earl of Chesterfield, was a British statesman, diplomat, man of letters, and an acclaimed wit of his time.

<i>Life of Samuel Johnson</i> Biography of Samuel Johnson by James Boswell

The Life of Samuel Johnson, LL.D. (1791) by James Boswell is a biography of English writer Dr. Samuel Johnson. The work was from the beginning a critical and popular success, and represents a landmark in the development of the modern genre of biography. It is notable for its extensive reports of Johnson's conversation. Many have called it the greatest biography written in English, but some modern critics object that the work cannot be considered a proper biography. Boswell's personal acquaintance with his subject began in 1763, when Johnson was 54 years old, and Boswell covered the entirety of Johnson's life by means of additional research. The biography takes many critical liberties with Johnson's life, as Boswell makes various changes to Johnson's quotations and even censors many comments. Nonetheless, the book is valued as both an important source of information on Johnson and his times, as well as an important work of literature.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bardolatry</span> Idolization of William Shakespeare

Bardolatry is excessive admiration of William Shakespeare. Shakespeare has been known as "the Bard" since the eighteenth century. One who idolizes Shakespeare is known as a bardolator. The term bardolatry, derived from Shakespeare's sobriquet "the Bard of Avon" and the Greek word latria "worship", was coined by George Bernard Shaw in the preface to his collection Three Plays for Puritans published in 1901. Shaw professed to dislike Shakespeare as a thinker and philosopher because Shaw believed that Shakespeare did not engage with social problems as Shaw did in his own plays.

Basil Montagu was a British jurist, barrister, writer and philanthropist. He was educated at Charterhouse and studied law at Cambridge. He was significantly involved in reforms to bankruptcy laws of Britain. He served as Accountant-General in Bankruptcy between 1835 and 1846. He was highly influenced by the writings of Francis Bacon. He was the son of John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich, and his mistress, singer Martha Ray.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ink and Incapability</span> 2nd episode of the 3rd series of Blackadder

"Ink and Incapability" is the second episode of the BBC sitcom Blackadder the Third, the third series of Blackadder.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jane Welsh Carlyle</span> Scottish writer

Jane Baillie Carlyle was a Scottish writer and the wife of Thomas Carlyle.

<i>London</i> (Samuel Johnson poem) Poem by Samuel Johnson

London is a poem by Samuel Johnson, produced shortly after he moved to London. Written in 1738, it was his first major published work. The poem in 263 lines imitates Juvenal's Third Satire, expressed by the character of Thales as he decides to leave London for Wales. Johnson imitated Juvenal because of his fondness for the Roman poet and he was following a popular 18th-century trend of Augustan poets headed by Alexander Pope that favoured imitations of classical poets, especially for young poets in their first ventures into published verse.

<i>The Vanity of Human Wishes</i>

The Vanity of Human Wishes: The Tenth Satire of Juvenal Imitated is a poem by the English author Samuel Johnson. It was written in late 1748 and published in 1749. It was begun and completed while Johnson was busy writing A Dictionary of the English Language and it was the first published work to include Johnson's name on the title page.

<i>Irene</i> (play) Play by Samuel Johnson

Irene is a Neoclassical tragedy written between 1726 and 1749 by Samuel Johnson. It has the distinction of being the work Johnson considered his greatest failure. Since his death, the critical consensus has been that he was right to think so.

A Biographical Sketch of Dr Samuel Johnson was written by Thomas Tyers for The Gentleman's Magazine's December 1784 issue. The work was written immediately after the death of Samuel Johnson and is the first postmortem biographical work on the author. The first full length biography was written by John Hawkins and titled Life of Samuel Johnson.

<i>The Plays of William Shakespeare</i> 18th-century collection edited by Samuel Johnson and George Steevens

The Plays of William Shakespeare was an 18th-century edition of the dramatic works of William Shakespeare, edited by Samuel Johnson and George Steevens. Johnson announced his intention to edit Shakespeare's plays in his Miscellaneous Observations on Macbeth (1745), and a full Proposal for the edition was published in 1756. The edition was finally published in 1765.

The health of Samuel Johnson has been a focus of the biographical and critical analysis of his life. His medical history was well documented by Johnson and his friends, and those writings have allowed later critics and doctors to infer diagnoses of conditions that were unknown in Johnson's day.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Early life of Samuel Johnson</span> Life of the English author (1709–1784)

Samuel Johnson was an English author born in Lichfield, Staffordshire. He was a sickly infant who early on began to exhibit the tics that would influence how people viewed him in his later years. From childhood he displayed great intelligence and an eagerness for learning, but his early years were dominated by his family's financial strain and his efforts to establish himself as a school teacher.

Robert Potter was an English clergyman of the Church of England and a translator, poet, critic and pamphleteer. He established the convention of using blank verse for Greek hexameters and rhymed verse for choruses. His 1777 English version of the plays of Aeschylus was frequently reprinted and the only one available for the next 50 years.

<i>The Imaginary Library</i> 1982 book by Alvin Kernan

The Imaginary Library: An Essay on Literature and Society is a 1982 book by American literary critic and professor Alvin Kernan. In the book, Kernan considers literature as a social institution and considers ways in which the reigning Romantic conception of literature, which has dominated Western culture for 200 years, has fallen into decline due to changes in society.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.