Rubric and decorated initial at the start of the oldest copy of the Libellus, misattributed to Cicero in a 14th-century manuscript
The Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris is a Latinmilitary treatise in the form of a collection of excerpts from the first three books of the Epitoma rei militaris of Vegetius. The author is conventionally known as Modestus (or Pseudo-Modestus) and most probably worked between the 9th and 12th centuries. His work is known from over 30 manuscripts and was printed six times before 1500. It was one of the canonical "old" military treatises of the 16th and 17th centuries. There is a late translation into Italian.
The Libellus is a short treatise.[1] It circulated widely alongside the Epitoma, despite its complete lack of originality. It is nothing but a collection of rearranged excerpts from the first three books of the Epitoma. It ignores siege warfare and naval warfare and "concentrates on the composition of the army and its disposition in battle".[2] It is divided into 23 chapters, two of which are drawn from the Epitoma's first book, fourteen from its second, seven from its third and none from its fourth. Of the fourteen chapters based on the second book, six are also chapters in Vegetius lifted unabridged. The ordering of the excerpts is topical, even when it diverges from the order in Vegetius.[3]
The Libellus' complete dependence on Vegetius was pointed out in print as early as 1580 by Modius. In 1585, however, Gottschalk Stewech argued that it was Vegetius who was dependent on the Libellus. In 1607, Petrus Scriverius defended Modius' conclusion and it has never been challenged since. Stewech's argument was based on the Libellus' dedication to Tacitus (275–276), who reigned a century before Vegetius' dedicatee, Gratian (376–383).[2] This dedication, however, is a late addition.[6] The earliest copy with a dedication to an emperor is from 1474 and names the emperor Theodosius. The earliest with a dedication to Tacitus is from 1487.[7]
Authorship
It is uncertain if Modestus is the actual name of the compiler, a pen name or neither.[8] The name Modestus is found in several manuscripts and most editions, but is not attested before 1474.[7] It is probably a piece of late guesswork or invention.[9] Some modern scholars have therefore opted for "Pseudo-Modestus".[10]
The earliest surviving ascription of the Libellus is to Cicero.[9] This ascription is false, but it is not known if the work was originally a forgery written in Cicero's name or if it merely came to be ascribed to him by mistake.[11] In the 14th century, it was believed that Cicero had written a military treatise, because the author of the Rhetorica ad Herennium, mistakenly believed at the time to have been written by Cicero, describes his intention to write such a treatise. No such treatise is actually known, nor do the three surviving references to it show that the supposed treatise was actually in circulation in the 14th century. The De vita et moribus philosophorum of 1326 refers to a single book by Cicero de rebus militaribus ('on military matters'). In one of his Familiar Letters dated 1345, Petrarch refers to a lost work of Cicero on rei militaris. A manuscript of 1376 containing a list of works by Cicero includes a Liber de re militari. These references may explain how the Libellus could have been seen as a lost work of Cicero.[12] Already in the 15th century, however, some scribes were casting doubt on the attribution.[13][14]
Another false attribution is to Cato. This may be a result of textual corruption of the name Cicero or another piece of educated guesswork based on Vegetius' citation of the work of Cato.[15]
Independently, Amedeo Peyron[it] (1820) and Friedrich Gottlob Haase (1847) proposed that the real compiler of the work was the Italian humanist Pomponio Leto (1428–1498), whose work appears alongside it in an edition of 1474. Some later scholars have even labelled the work a forgery by either Leto or one of his students. These views are untenable, having been disproved by Lorenzo Dalmasso in 1907, citing manuscripts of the Libellus that are older than Leto. It is possible that the attribution to Modestus originated with Leto or his followers, either as pure invention or educated guess.[6] The sudden appearance in the late 15th century of a classical name and an imperial dedication certainly had the effect of "creating a new classic".[16]
The 9th-century copy of Vegetius that Pseudo-Modestus may have used
There have been attempts to identify a historical Modestus whose name may have formed the inspiration for the misattribution. Candidates include Julius Modestus, mentioned by Suetonius; Aufidius Modestus, cited by Philargyrius; and Herennius Modestinus, the disciple of Ulpian.[17]
Date
Of the date of the Libellus, the most that can be said with certainty is that it was compiled sometime after 450 and before the mid-14th century, the date of the earliest manuscript.[11] In 450, one Flavius Eutropius corrected a copy of the Epitoma at Constantinople and the version used by the compiler stems from this corrected version.[18] Its modern editors opt for a date in the 9th century.[19] In favour of this hypothesis is the fact that two other 9th-century writers are known to have excerpted Vegetius, Sedulius Scotus and Hrabanus Maurus. The emphasis of the Libellus, however, is entirely different from those of the compilations of Sedulius and Hrabanus.[20]
Michael Reeve puts the work between the mid-9th century and the 12th century. He argues that the Libellus was compiled from a 9th-century manuscript of Vegetius copied at Corbie Abbey in the time of Hadoard (fl.c.850). This manuscript, now Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, lat. 6503, contains a system of brackets which may mark passages to be excerpted. The one who added the brackets appears to also have made a correction that was included in the 12th-century manuscript Montpellier, Bibliothèque interuniversitaire section médecine, H 133. If the corrector was indeed the excerptor, he must have worked no later than the 12th century.[21]
The Libellus is still occasionally taken to be a work of antiquity.[22]
There is an Italian translation, Delle ordinanze de' Romani, known from a single manuscript copy from the 17th or 18th century, now London, British Library, Add. 24216.[25] The translation contains only the first 21 chapters, but does have the interpolation from Policraticus. It is attributed to a certain Landino, which the library catalogue identifies with Cristoforo Landino (1424–1498).[26]
Six printed editions of the Libellus appeared before 1500. Under the title De disciplina militari and ascribed to Cicero, it was printed with his other philosophical works by Wendelin of Speyer at Venice in 1471. It was printed again at Venice in 1474 under the title De re militari, dedicated to Theodosius and ascribed to Modestus.[27] Under the same title and author, it was printed at Rome around the same time and again in 1494. In 1487, a new edition prepared by Giovanni Sulpizio da Veroli and printed by Eucharius Silber[de] appeared at Rome under the title Libellus de vocabulis rei militaris, dedicated to Tacitus but still ascribed to Modestus.[27][28] In 1495–1496, an edition with the same title was printed at Bologna.[27] This became the preferred title to distinguish the work from that of Vegetius, which was often called De re militari.[29]
In the 15th century, the Libellus was frequently copied alongside other military works. It appears together with the works of Vegetius and Frontinus in Turin, Biblioteca Reale, Saluzzo 3; Leiden, Bibliotheek der Rijksuniversiteit, Voss. lat. F. 59; and Paris, Bibliothèque Mazarine, 3732, where it is also accompanied by the work of Aelian.[30] Beginning with the 1487 edition and continuing throughout the 16th and 17th centuries, the Libellus, under the name Modestus, was one of the canonical "scriptores veteres rei militaris" (old writers on military matters), alongside Vegetius, Frontinus and Aelian.[31][32][33]
Notes
↑ The modern Latin edition is found in González Rolán & Moure Casas 1986–1987, pp.311–319. According to Reeve 2003, pp.419 & 424, they mostly follow the copy made for Cardinal Carafa, which itself is probably based on the 1487 printed edition.
↑ Reeve 2003, pp.430–431. BnF 6503 also has a system of double and triple dots, but these do not seem to correspond to the passages excerpted in the Libellus.
↑ According to Reeve 2003, p.428, the catalogue dates the manuscript to the 17th century, but the hand of the Delle ordinanze is distinct and may be an 18th-century addition. Allmand 2011, p.226, dates the copy to the 16th century.
↑ According to Reeve 2003, p.428, the manuscript contains the attribution Landini lo tradusse ("Landino translated it"), which the catalogue identifies with Cristoforo. Allmand 2011, p.226, accepts the identification, while Reeve, in suggesting that the copy may be an autograph, disputes it.
Allmand, Christopher (2011). The De Re Militari of Vegetius: The Reception, Transmission and Legacy of a Roman Text in the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press.
Reeve, Michael D. (2003). "Modestus, scriptor rei militaris". In Pierre Lardet (ed.). La tradition vive: Mélanges d'histoire des textes en l'honneur de Louis Holtz. Bibliologia. Vol.20. Brepols. pp.417–432. doi:10.1484/m.bib-eb.3.1418. ISBN978-2-503-51321-8.
Reeve, Michael D., ed. (2004). Vegetius: Epitoma rei militaris. Oxford University Press.
Reeve, Michael D. (2011). "A Proposal About Modestus, scriptor rei militaris". Manuscripts and Methods: Essays on Editing and Transmission. Edizioni di storia e letteratura. pp.186–207.
Robles Sánchez, María Ángeles (2003). "El ejército romano según el Breve tratado de términos militares de Modesto (Modesti libellus de vocabulis rei militaris ad Tacitum Augustum): Traducción". Aqvila Legionis. 4: 137–164.
Robles Sánchez, María Ángeles (2004). "Estudio léxico del Breve tratado de términos militares de Modesto". Aqvila Legionis. 5: 45–105.
PubliusVegetius Renatus, known as Vegetius, was a writer of the Later Roman Empire. Nothing is known of his life or station beyond what is contained in his two surviving works: Epitoma rei militaris, and the lesser-known Digesta Artis Mulomedicinae, a guide to veterinary medicine. He identifies himself in the opening of his work Epitoma rei militaris as a Christian.
Perizonius was the name of Jakob Voorbroek, a Dutch classical scholar, who was born at Appingedam in Groningen.
De re militari, also Epitoma rei militaris, is a treatise by the Late Latin writer Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus about Roman warfare and military principles as a presentation of the methods and practices in use during the height of the Roman Empire and responsible for its power. The extant text dates to the 5th century.
De re publica is a dialogue on Roman politics by Cicero, written in six books between 54 and 51 BC. The work does not survive in a complete state, and large parts are missing. The surviving sections derive from excerpts preserved in later works and from an incomplete palimpsest uncovered in 1819. Cicero uses the work to explain Roman constitutional theory. Written in imitation of Plato's Republic, it takes the form of a Socratic dialogue in which Scipio Aemilianus takes the role of a wise old man.
Si vis pacem, para bellum is a Latin adage translated as "If you want peace, prepare for war." The phrase is adapted from a statement found in Roman author Publius Flavius Vegetius Renatus's tract Dē Rē Mīlitārī, in which the actual phrasing is Igitur quī dēsīderat pācem, præparet bellum. The idea which it conveys also appears in earlier works such as Plato's Nomoi (Laws). The phrase presents the insight that the conditions of peace are often preserved by a readiness to make war when necessary.
Plumbatae or martiobarbuli were lead-weighted darts carried by infantrymen in Antiquity and the Middle Ages.
Sagittarii is the Latin term for archers. The term sagittariorum in the title of an infantry or cavalry unit indicated a specialized archer regiment. Regular auxiliary units of foot and horse archers appeared in the Roman army during the early empire. During the Principate roughly two thirds of all archers were on foot and one third were horse archers. Mercenary foot archers already served with the Roman republican army, but horse archers were only introduced after the Romans came into conflict with Eastern armies that relied heavily on mounted archery in the 1st century BC, most notably the Parthians, whose mounted archers were decisive for Crassus's major defeat in the Battle of Carrhae. Since the time of Augustus however, Romans and Italians were also levied as dedicated archers. In the early 1st century BC horse archers were already in widespread use and even supported Roman campaigns against the Germanic tribes in the Central Europe.
Bellifortis is the first fully illustrated manual of military technology, written by Konrad Kyeser and dating from the start of the 15th century. It summarises material from classical writers on military technology, like Vegetius' De Re Militari and Frontinus' anecdotal Strategemata, emphasising poliorcetics, or the art of siege warfare, but treating magic as a supplement to the military arts; it is "saturated with astrology", remarked Lynn White, Jr. in a review of the first facsimile edition.
Divina proportione, later also called De divina proportione is a book on mathematics written by Luca Pacioli and illustrated by Leonardo da Vinci, completed by February 9th, 1498 in Milan and first printed in 1509. Its subject was mathematical proportions and their applications to geometry, to visual art through perspective, and to architecture. The clarity of the written material and Leonardo's excellent diagrams helped the book to achieve an impact beyond mathematical circles, popularizing contemporary geometric concepts and images.
Christopher Thomas Allmand FSA was an English historian, who specialised in the Late Middle Ages in England and France. His particular research and teaching interests lay in the Hundred Years' War. He spent most of his teaching career at the University of Liverpool, becoming Professor of Medieval History, until his retirement in 1998. Among many publications, he produced a much-used monograph on the Hundred Years' War and the leading biography of King Henry V.
Droungos or drungus is a late Roman and Byzantine term for a battalion-sized military unit, and later for a local command guarding mountain districts. Its commander was a "droungarios" or "drungarius" (δρουγγάριος), anglicized as "Drungary".
Carroballista was an ancient, cart-mounted ballista, a type of mobile field artillery. According to the Roman author Vegetius, each legion had 55 carroballistae which were arrow/bolt-shooter of the cheiroballistra type. Vegetius tells us that each carroballista was carried by mules and operated by one contubernium. Surviving representation of a carroballista are from the bas-reliefs of Trajan's Column and the Column of Marcus Aurelius.
The Paenitentiale Theodori is an early medieval penitential handbook based on the judgements of Archbishop Theodore of Canterbury. It exists in multiple versions, the fullest and historically most important of which is the U or Discipulus Umbrensium version, composed (probably) in Northumbria within approximately a decade or two after Theodore's death. Other early though far less popular versions are those known today as the Capitula Dacheriana, the Canones Gregorii, the Canones Basilienses, and the Canones Cottoniani, all of which were compiled before the Paenitentiale Umbrense probably in either Ireland and/or England during or shortly after Theodore's lifetime.
Michael David Reeve FBA is a British classicist and professor emeritus at Cambridge University. One of the foremost textual scholars of his generation, he has published widely on the transmission of Latin and Greek texts. He served as the eighth Kennedy Professor of Latin.
A military treatise or treatise on war is any work that deals with the "art of war" in some basic aspect. Fundamentally military treatises are treatises on military strategy. Other works may also be included in the definition that, although they deal with other topics, include sensitive information about military matters. These may include, among others, description of specific battles, sieges, general campaigns, reports of military authorities, and commented works about ground or naval battles.
The Libellus de expugnatione Terrae Sanctae per Saladinum, also called the Chronicon terrae sanctae, is a short anonymous Latin account of the conquests of Saladin in the Holy Land between 1186 and 1191. The core of the text was written shortly after the events it describes and then supplemented by the addition of an account of the Third Crusade early in the thirteenth century. This probably took place at Coggeshall Abbey in England. Neither the original author nor the continuator/compiler is known by name.
García Miguel de Ayerbe was an Aragonese nobleman and cleric who served as the bishop of León from April 1318 until his death. In the 1320s, he wrote a proposal for a new crusade to recover the Holy Land.
Nicolas Volcyr de Serrouville, known in German as Nicolaus Wollick, was a translator, music theorist and historian, one of the most prominent figures of the Renaissance in the Duchy of Lorraine.
Classiarii referred to all military personnel and personnel assigned to the maneuvering of ships or their construction/maintenance, as part of the Roman navy, an integral part of the Roman army.
Pietro Ippolito da Luni was the royal scribe of the Kingdom of Naples from 1472 to 1492. He was a native of the Lunigiana.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
