List of Irish Supreme Court cases

Last updated

This is a partial list of cases decided by the Supreme Court of Ireland, the highest court in the Republic of Ireland. The list is organized chronologically within areas of law.

Contents

Constitutional

Case nameCitationSummary
State (Burke) v Lennon [1940] IR 135Imprisonment without trial; habeas corpus
Sinn Féin Funds case (Buckley and Others v the Attorney-General and Another)[1950] IR 67Separation of powers and right to property
McGee v The Attorney General [1974] IR 284, [1973] IESC 2Right to privacy in marital affairs; ability to import contraceptives
Norris v Attorney General [1983] IESC 3, [1984] IR 36Decriminalization of homosexuality
Crotty v An Taoiseach [1987] IESC 4 Ratification of the Single European Act and external state sovereignty
Attorney General v X [1992] IESC 1; [1992] 1 IR 1Termination of pregnancy where there is risk to the mother including suicide.
In re Article 26 and the Regulation of Information (Services outside the State for Termination of Pregnancies) Bill 1995 [1995] IESC 9, [1995] 1 IR 1 Natural law supersedes positive law.
O'C(P) v DPP (2000) 3 IR 87; 2000 IESC 58Examined the conditions under which a substantial delay can be ruled to result in an unfair trial.
De Roiste v Minister for Defence [2001] 1 IR 190; [2001] IESC 4; [2001] 2 ILRM 241The Court held that the extended delay (three decades in this case) in bringing forward an action was grounds for dismissal of the action.
Ardagh v Maguire [2002] IESC 21; [2002] 1 IR 385The Court ruled that the holding of an inquiry concerning the case of a fatal shooting of a member of An Garda Síochána by the Houses of the Oireachtas was an ultra vires act.
Dunne v Donohoe [2002] IESC 35, [2002] 2 IR 533Possession and security arrangements of firearms
P.M. v District Judge Miriam Malone and the Director of Public Prosecutions [2002] IESC 46 Barred prosecution of an individual due to an inordinate delay.
The Health (amendment) (No. 2) Bill 2004 [2005] IESC 7 The right of a person to recover property can determine the constitutionality of a bill
Dekra Eireann Teo v Minister of Environment [2003] 2 IR 270; [2003] 2 ILRM 210; [2003] IESC 25 A key feature of both European law and court rules is the policy of urgency.
Kelly v Trinity College Dublin [2007] IESC 61 Former employments or associations are insufficient to disqualify a person from participating in disciplinary or similar tribunals related to that former employment.
Roche v Roche [2009] IESC 82 Frozen embryos are not considered "unborn" in the context of the Constitution of Ireland.
Meadows v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2010] IESC 3; [2010] 2 IR 701; [2011] 2 ILRM 157The proportionality test should be used when reviewing administrative actions that implicate fundamental rights protected by both the Irish Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights.
Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11; [2012] 13 ILRM 153; [2012] 2 IR 266The Supreme Court held that any search warrant issued by a person who is associated with the investigation was invalid.
Benedict McGowan and Others v Labour Court and Others [2013] 2 ILRM 276; [2013] IESC 21; [2013] 3 IR 718Provisions of Part III of the Industrial Relations Act are invalid considering the provisions of Article 15.2.1 of the Constitution of Ireland.
John Gilligan v Ireland & Others [2013] IESC 45; [2013] 2 IR 745; [2014] ILRM 153Section 13 of the Criminal Law Act 1976 allows judges to apply the principle of proportionality in sentencing.
Roche (also known as Dumbrell) v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2014] IESC 53The Court decided that the Bail Act of 1997 is not a code that explains all the rules about the law on bail.
Vincent Sweeney v Governor of Loughlan House Open Centre and Others [2014] 2 ILRM 401; [2014] IESC 42; [2014] 2 IR 732A sentence being served in the administering state must be of the same legal nature as imposed in the sentencing state.
Bederev v Ireland [2016] IESC 34; [2016] 3 IR 1; [2016] 2 ILRM 340A government decision to expand the list of controlled drugs did not infringe on the authority of the Oireachtas
O'Farrell and Others v Governor of Portlaoise Prison [2016] IESC 37 Identified a problem in the way the Irish prison system carried out prison sentences handed down by courts in other countries.
O'Connell & anor v The Turf Club [2015] IESC 57; [2017] 2 IR 43Organizational body of a sport is subject to judicial review even if the body was not created by statute.
B S v The Director of Public Prosecutions [2017] IESCDET 134The Supreme Court “is no longer a Court for the correction of error but rather a Court which has the principal constitutional task of determining issues of general importance.” [1]
Grace and anor v An Bórd Pleanála & ors [2017] IESC 10 Clarified the criteria for standing (sufficient connection to support participation in a case) in relation to judicial review of environmental concerns.
Hickey v McGowan & ors [2017] IESC 6
Damache v Minister for Justice [2021] IESC 6Clarified revocation of citizenship was not an aspect of the judicial power constitutionally reserved to the judicial branch, but an executive power
Heneghan v Minister for Housing, Planning and Local Government & Ors[2023] IESC 7Confirmed the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution mandated the Oireachtas to expand the franchise for Seanad elections

Criminal

Case nameCitationSummary
Melling v O'Mathghamhna ,[1962] IR 1Restated Elements of a Criminal Offence
Attorney General v Oldridge [2000] IESC 29; [2000] 4 IR 593Establishing a corresponding offense for extradition; definition of fraud
Murphy v GM , [2001] IESC 82Affirmed the constitutional validity of the Irish Criminal Assets Bureau (See also Gilligan v Criminal Assets Bureau )
Blood v DPP [2005] IESC 8 Confirmed that a right to an expeditious trial is implied in the right to a fair trial under Irish law.
DPP v Cronin (No. 2) [2006] IESC 9; [2006] 4 IR 329An "error or oversight of substance" must exhibited before a court would permit a new point to be raised on appeal.
A v Governor of Arbour Hill Prison [2006] IESC 45 A finding that criminal legislation is unconstitutional need not render existing convictions void.
McFarlane v Director of Public Prosecutions [2008] IESC 7; [2008] 4 IR 117The right to a fair trial does not preclude prosecution in cases of prosecutorial delay unless the accused can demonstrate specific prejudice or that the delay was outside the norm.
Brian Rattigan v DPP [2008] IESC 34 A criminal trial would be prohibited where prosecutorial delay or adverse pre-trial publicity created a substantial risk of unfairness to the accused.
McNulty v DPP [2009] IESC 12; [2009] 3 IR 572The Supreme Court upheld the decisions of the lower courts and decided that the question of Judicial Review was not to be dealt with by the Supreme Court.
DPP v McLoughlin [2009] IESC 65 The admissibility of hearsay evidence for bail applications
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Dolny [2009] IESC 48 The court found that a European extradition can be applied if the offense is very similar to an offense in Irish law.
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Stafford [2009] IESC 83 A warrant which is based on circumstantial evidence can be enforced even if the participation of the defendant is only suspected to have taken place in the crime.
Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform v Murphy [2010] IESC 17 Expanded the meaning of "detention order"
Director of Public Prosecutions v Pat Hegarty [2011] IESC 32 Officers/key employees involved in anti-competitive practices may be prosecuted for their involvement, regardless of whether the undertaking itself has been prosecuted.
Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform v Bailey [2012] IESC 16 Clarified the grounds under which a person could be extradited for a European Arrest Warrant.
Callan v Ireland & The Attorney General [2013] IESC 35; [2013] IR 267; [2013] ILRM 257Clarified the relationship between commutation and a sentence of imprisonment in the context of an appeal for early release.
Roche (Also Known as Dumbrell) v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2014] IESC 53The Court held that the Bail Act 1997 is not a code providing an exhaustive statement regarding the law on bail.
DPP v Peter Cullen [2014] IESC 7, [2014] 3 IR 30Addressed the routine practice of the Garda Síochána of placing handcuffs after an arrest for drink driving.
Thomas Murphy v Ireland and Others [2014] IESC 19; [2014] 1 ILRM 457; [2014] 1 IR 198The Director of Public Prosecutions failing to provide reasons for the issuing of a certificate under Section 42(6) of the Offences against the State Act 1939 was not repugnant to the Constitution.
O'Farrell v Governor of Portlaoise Prison [2016] IESC 37, [2016] 3 R 619The Irish state was found to be unable to implement sentencing in accord with the Transfer of Sentenced Persons Act 1995.

Family

Case nameCitationSummary
P.F v G.O'M (Otherwise G.F) [2000] IESC 81 Clarified the grounds for annulment of marriage in relation to informed consent.
T(D) v L(F) & Anor [2003] IESC 59 In relation to foreign divorce proceedings, the burden of proof is on the parties to establish their domicile.
K. (C.) v K. (J.) [2004] 2 ILRM 168, [2004] IESC 21, [2004] 1 IR 224Held that the doctrine of estoppel could not be used to change the status of a person, when the status, as a matter of law, never actually changed.
McD v L [2007] IESC 28, [2008] 1 IR 417Granted visitation rights to sperm donors.
Gt v Kao [2007] IESC 55, [2008] 3 IR 567An unmarried father who has been actively involved in raising his children or child is eligible for legal custody rights.
Nottinghamshire County Council v B [2011] IESC 48; [2013] 4 IR 662Refused to overturn an order of the High Court returning children of married parents from England to that jurisdiction.
Child and Family Agency v RD [2014] IESC 47 Confirmed that jurisdiction of EU states which first issue orders have primacy but that the High Court in Ireland has the right under EU law to grant provisional protection orders to allow a child to stay in Ireland.
MR and DR v An t-Ard-Chláraitheoir [2014] IESC 60It was decided that children born through surrogacy will have the name of their birth mother on their birth certificate and not the mother who is going to raise them.
O.R v an Tard Chlairaitheoir [2014] IESC 60The Court held that the Civil Registration Act 2004 only allows the birth mother to be on the birth certificate.
Child and Family Agency (formerly Health Service Executive) v O.A. [2015] IESC 52 The court determined the grounds where a family should be granted legal costs.
H v H [2015]  IESC  85 Guidelines for when common law principles could be reinterpreted.
Child and Family Agency (Formerly Health Service Executive) v OA 2015] IESC 52, [2015] 2 ILRM 145,[2015] 2 IR 718Addressed payment o child care costs the context of unsuccessful challenge by the Child and Family Agency
Child and Family Agency v McG and JC [2017] IESC 9, [2017] 1 IR 1Where a detention was lacking in due process of law due to breach of fundamental requirements of justice, it may be challenged through an application for release under the constitutional principle of habeas corpus even in the case of disputes as to the custody of children.

Finance

Case nameCitationSummary
Fyffes Plc v DCC Plc [2005] IESC 3 Disclosure of privileged documents to a third party does not always destroy or waive the privilege over expert advice obtained in connection with litigation and pending criminal prosecution for insider dealing.
Director of Corporate Enforcement v Barry Seymour [2011] IESC 45; [2013] 1 IR 82Commercial misjudgement was not in itself sufficient to justify disqualification as a company director under the Companies Act 1990.
Bank of Ireland v O'Donnell & ors [2015] IESC 90 Clarified the grounds for recusal under grounds of "objective bias."
Irish Life and Permanent plc v Dunne [2015] IESC 46; [2016] 1 IR 92Clarified the impact of a lender failing to comply with the Code of Conduct on Mortgage Arrears 2010 (the “Code”) on that lender’s right to obtain an order of possession of mortgaged property.
Collins v Minister for Finance [2016] IESC 73; [2017] 1 ILRM 65; [2017] 3 IR 99Legalised emergency measures to deal with Ireland's 2008 financial crisis.

Immigration

Case nameCitationSummary
P., L., & B. v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2001] IESC 107, [2002] 1 ILRM 16Refusal of an application for asylum may constitute a sufficient basis for the government to order the applicant's deportation.
Z. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2002] IESC 14 The absence of an oral hearing need not infringe the right of an applicant for refugee status to natural and constitutional justice.
Lobe v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2003] IESC 3 Applicant minors enjoy, in general terms, the right not to be expelled form the state—a right subject to limited qualification (such as lawful extradition to another state).
Dimbo v Minister for Justice [2008] IESC 26 A deportation order must consider facts that are specific to the individual child.
Okunade v Minister for Justice & Others [2012] IESC 49 Disruption to family life and risk to children are grounds to grant an interlocutory injunction.
H.N. v Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform and others [2012] IESC 58 In Irish law an applicant could not apply for subsidiary protection without first applying for, and then being refused refugee status.
Sulaimon v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2012] IESC 63 The court quashed the Minister's decision on the refusal to issue a Certificate of Nationality.
Smith v Minister for Justice and Equality [2013] IESC 4 The court decided that in this case, the right of a citizen to have a family was not enough to warrant the revocation of deportation order, as the deportation of the appellant would not force his child to leave the jurisdiction and thus would not deprive the citizen of their right to live in the European Union.
A (a Minor) v Minister for Justice and Equality and others [2013] IESC 18 A certificate of leave to appeal is not required in order to appeal to the Supreme Court a decision of the High Court to dismiss proceedings as frivolous or vexatious.
AMS v Minister for Justice and Equality [2014] IESC 65 The Minister for Justice can evaluate the financial burden that a refugee's dependents may put on the State when assessing an application for entry.
T.D v Minister for Justice Equality and Law Reform [2014] IESC 29The court issued a determination concerning the equivalence of Irish and EU immigration statutes.
Sivsivadze v Minister for Justice [2015] IESC 53; [2015] 2 ILRM 73; [2016] 2 IR 403Dismissed a challenge to the constitutionality of section 3(1) of the Immigration Act 1999 (the "1999 Act"), under which the Minister for Justice order the deportation of a non-national (without permission to remain in the State) for an indefinite period.
N.V.H v Minister for Justice & Equality [2017] IESC 35 Employment rights for asylum seekers could be restricted but a "complete" ban violates the right to seek employment.
Y.Y. v Minister for Justice and Equality [2017] IESC 61 Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights which prohibits torture, inhuman or degrading treatment was absolute; the Minister for Justice and Equality should consider this possibility when making a deportation order.
AAA & Anor v Minister for Justice & Ors [2017] IESC 80 Clarified the grounds under which a claim for subsidiary protection could be heard.

Procedural

Case nameCitationSummary
Wunder v Hospitals Trust Supreme Court, unreported, Walsh, Haugh and O’Keeffe JJ., 24 January 1967Frivolous or vexations proceedings.
Bula Ltd v Tara Mines Ltd (No 6) [2000] 4 IR 412 The court considered the test for objective bias in Ireland.
Adam v The Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform [2001] IESC 38 ]; [2001] 2 ILRM 452Confirmed conditions under which judicial review could be struck out as frivolous.
Braddish v DPP [2001] 3 IR 127]; [2001] IESC 45; [2002] 1 ILRM 151Prosecution based on a video tape not available the accused was quashed.
SIAC Construction Ltd v The County Council of the County of Mayo [2002] IESC 39A tender-awarding authority is required to respect the general principles of equality, transparency, and objectivity.
Dunne v Director of Public Prosecutions [2002] 2 IR 305; [2002] IESC 27; [2002] 2 ILRM 241Fair procedure imposes a duty on the prosecution to seek out and preserve all evidence that has a bearing or a potential bearing on the issue of guilt or innocence.
Ryanair p.l.c. v Aer Rianta c.p.t. [2003] IESC 62 When addressing issues relating to discovery the burden of proof rests firmly on the party seeking the discovery.
DB v The Minister for Health [2003] 3 IR 12, [2003] IESC 22 The literal approach (wording is interpreted using the "natural" and "ordinary" meaning of language) should always be used first when it comes to interpreting statutes.
Goold v Collins and Ors [2004] IESC 38; [2004] 7 JIC 1201A statutory provision's constitutionality may be reviewed only at the behest of a litigant who is contesting some current application of that provision.
Murphy v County Wexford VEC [2004] IESC 49; [2004] 4 IR 202School Authorities owe a duty to those pupils to take reasonable care to ensure that the pupils do not suffer injury.
Gilroy v Flynn [2004] IESC 98; [2005] 1 ILRM 290Excessive delays in the delivery of a statement of claim are no longer acceptable even where the fault of the delay lies with a professional adviser, and not the plaintiff.
Sheedy v Information Commissioner [2005] IESC 35; [2005] 2 IR 272The court in this instance ruled that the statutory privilege to deny access to the data of schools superseded the various Freedom of Information provisions.
D.C. v DPP [2005] IESC 77 A trial can be prohibited "where there is a real or serious risk of an unfair trial."
Dundon v Governor of Cloverhill Prison [2005] IESC 83 First person extradited under a European Arrest Warrant
PM v Director of Public Prosecutions [2006] 3 IR 172, [2006] IESC 22; [2006] 2 ILRM 361Prosecutorial delay that deprives an accused of the right to a speedy trial is, in and of itself, one factor to consider in carrying out the balancing exercise.
Dunne v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and Local Government [2007] IESC 60 Court has discretion in charges for cases brought in the public interest.
Gerald J.P. Stephens v Paul Flynn Ltd [2008] IESC 4; [2008] 4 IR 31Absent special circumstances, a party's failure to deliver a statement of claim within a period of twenty months is inexcusable and will justify dismissal of the litigation.
Bank of Ireland Mortgage Bank v Coleman [2009] 2 ILRM 363; [2009] 3 IR 699The Court clarified the inherent jurisdiction of the court with respect of a solicitor's misconduct.
MJELR v Rettinger [2010] IESC 45; [2010] 3 IR 783Established grounds to resist a European Arrest Warrant in the context of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
Irwin v Deasy [2010] IESC 45; [2011] 2 IR 752Section 71(4) of the Registration of Title Act 1964 does not authorise division or sale in place of partition.
Board of Management St. Molaga's National School v The Secretary General of the Department of Education and Science [2010] IESC 57; [2011] 1 IR 362Under Section 29 of the Education Act 1998, the decision of a school's board of management to refuse to enrol a student may be subject to a full re-hearing by an appeals committee appointed by the Minister for Education.
McInerney Homes Ltd v Cos Acts 1990 [2011] IESC 31 The onus of proof under the Company Acts lay with the examiner to show that a proposed scheme of debt restructuring was not unfair to any interested party.
Comcast Int. Holdings v Minister for Public Enterprise & ors and Persona Digital Telephony Ltd v Minister for Public Enterprise & ors [2012] IESC 50 The decision by Michael Lowery, then Minister for Public Enterprise, to award a phone license to ESAT was "unlawful."
Ryan v Governor of Midlands Prison [2014] IESC 54 A court order detaining a convicted individual that is not prima facie invalid should only be challenged through an appeal of the conviction or an application for judicial review.
F.X. v The Clinical Director of Central Mental Hospital and Another [2014] IESC 1; [2014] 1 IR 280The court "clarified two important points about the habeas corpus jurisdiction".
Island Ferries Teoranta v Minister for Communications [2015] IESC 95; [2015] 3 IR 637The court held that the determination of whether or not there has been an abuse of a dominant position is fact-specific and is based on an analysis of all relevant factors
Moylist Construction Limited v Doheny [2016] IESC 9; [2016] 2 IR 283A court should not entertain an application to dismiss proceedings where the legal issues or questions of construction arising in the case are complex.
Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner [2016] IESC 18 Answers provided by a candidate sitting an exam can be considered as information relating to the candidate and thus can be defined as the personal data of the candidate.
CC v Minister for Justice [2016] IESC 48 Reexamination of a previously established test with respect to whether an order for deportation could be granted where an appeal was pending within the courts system.
McCann v Halpin [2016] IESC 11 This case, defined the close of business hours and made it clear that the rule of construction should be used in letters of demands or contracts.
Wansboro v DPP and anor [2017] IESCDET 115 Established grounds for expedited appeal to the Supreme Court.
Quinn Insurance Ltd v Price Waterhouse Cooper [2017] IESC 73 Ruling on the right to leave to appeal.
Persona Digital Telephony Ltd v Minister for Public Enterprise, Ireland [2017] IESC 27 Third party funding to support a plaintiff's legal costs and disbursements is unlawful.
Permanent TSB Plc v Langan and Anor [2017] IESC 71

Tort

Case nameCitationSummary
Byrne v Ireland [1972] IR 241Abolished the immunity of the state in tort
Gough v Neary & Cronin [2003] IESC 39; [2003] IR 92; [2004] 1 ILRM 35Claim for personal injury was not statute barred.
Doherty v Reynolds and St. James's Hospital Board [2004] IESC 42 Under the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur, where an injury would not be expected to occur without negligence, negligence on the part of those charged with the thing's management may be presumed from the mere fact of injury/
Philp v Ryan [2004] IESC 105Held that a plaintiff's 'lost chance' is actionable in the context of medical negligence
Geraldine Weir-Rodgers v SF Trust Ltd [2005] IESC 2 Confirmed that under Section 4 of the Occupiers Liability Act 1995 an occupier of land is not required to safeguard trespassers or recreational users.
Harold Wildgust and Carrickowen Ltd v Bank of Ireland and Norwich Union Life Assurance Society [2005] IESC 19; [2006] 2 ILRM 28; [2006] 1 IR 570; [2007] 3 IR 39The court outlined the "proximity test" which is to be used in cases involving negligent misstatement and held that duty of care concerning negligent misstatement is not confined to the persons to whom the misstatement is actually made.
Delahunty v Player and Willis (Ireland) Ltd. [2006] IESC 21 Granted permission to pursue tobacco companies for damages.
Quinn -v- Irish Bank Resolution Corporation Ltd (In Special Liquidation) & ors [2015] IESC 29Decided whether or not a contract is automatically unenforceable if it is illegal.
Walsh v Jones Lang Lasalle Ltd [2017] IESC 38 A purchaser bears the risk of reliance on erroneous information unless the vendor has clearly assumed responsibility for its accuracy.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judge</span> Official who presides over court proceedings

A judge is a person who presides over court proceedings, either alone or as a part of a panel of judges. In an adversarial system the judge hears all the witnesses and any other evidence presented by the barristers or solicitors of the case, assesses the credibility and arguments of the parties, and then issues a ruling in the case based on their interpretation of the law and their own personal judgment. A judge is expected to conduct the trial impartially and, typically, in an open court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Law of the United Kingdom</span>

The United Kingdom has three distinctly different legal systems, each of which derives from a particular geographical area for a variety of historical reasons: English law, Scots law, Northern Ireland law, and, since 2007, calls for a fourth type, that of purely Welsh law as a result of Welsh devolution, with further calls for a Welsh justice system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cearbhall Ó Dálaigh</span> President of Ireland from 1974 to 1976

Cearbhall Ó Dálaigh was an Irish Fianna Fáil politician, judge and barrister who served as the fifth president of Ireland from December 1974 to October 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Four Courts</span> Major court complex in Dublin, Ireland

The Four Courts is Ireland's most prominent courts building, located on Inns Quay in Dublin. The Four Courts is the principal seat of the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, the High Court and the Dublin Circuit Court. Until 2010 the building also housed the Central Criminal Court; this is now located in the Criminal Courts of Justice building.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coat of arms of the United Kingdom</span>

The coat of arms of the United Kingdom are the arms of dominion of the British monarch. They are both the personal arms of the monarch, currently King Charles III, and the arms of the state. In addition to the monarch, the arms are used by state institutions including the Government of the United Kingdom, the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and the British judiciary. Differenced versions of the arms are used by members of the British royal family. The monarch's official flag, the Royal Standard, is the coat of arms in flag form.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Paterson (judge)</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1793 to 1806

William Paterson was an American statesman, lawyer, jurist, and signer of the United States Constitution. He was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, the second governor of New Jersey, and a Founding Father of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of Ireland</span> Highest judicial authority in Ireland

The Supreme Court of Ireland is the highest judicial authority in Ireland. It is a court of final appeal and exercises, in conjunction with the Court of Appeal and the High Court, judicial review over Acts of the Oireachtas. The Supreme Court also has appellate jurisdiction to ensure compliance with the Constitution of Ireland by governmental bodies and private citizens. It sits in the Four Courts in Dublin.

Amendments to the Constitution of Ireland are only possible by way of referendum. A proposal to amend the Constitution of Ireland must be initiated as a bill in Dáil Éireann, be passed by both Houses of the Oireachtas (parliament), then submitted to a referendum, and finally signed into law by the president of Ireland. Since the constitution entered into force on 29 December 1937, there have been 32 amendments to the constitution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of India</span> Presiding judge of the Supreme Court of India

The chief justice of India is the highest-ranking officer of the Indian judiciary and the chief judge of the Supreme Court of India. The Constitution of India grants power to the president of India to appoint, as recommended by outgoing chief justice in consultation with other judges as envisaged in Article 124 (2) of the Constitution, the next chief justice, who will serve until they reach the age of 65 or are removed by the constitutional process of impeachment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pierce Butler (judge)</span> US Supreme Court justice from 1923 to 1939

Pierce Butler was an American jurist who served as an associate justice of the Supreme Court of the United States from 1923 until his death in 1939. He was a staunch conservative and was regarded as a part of the Four Horsemen, the conservative bloc that dominated the Supreme Court during the 1930s. A devout Catholic, he was also the sole dissenter in the later case Buck v. Bell, though he did not write an opinion.

Puisne judge and puisne justice are terms for an ordinary judge or a judge of lesser rank of a particular court. The term comes from a combination of the two French words, puis, "since, later" + , and "born", which have been combined as French: puisné or puîné; meaning "junior".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of the United Kingdom</span> Final court of appeal in the United Kingdom

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom is the final court of appeal in the United Kingdom for all civil cases, and for criminal cases originating in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. As the United Kingdom’s highest appellate court for these matters, it hears cases of the greatest public or constitutional importance affecting the whole population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chief Justice of Ireland</span> Head of the judiciary of the Republic of Ireland

The chief justice of Ireland is the president of the Supreme Court of Ireland. The chief justice is the highest judicial office and most senior judge in Ireland. The role includes constitutional and administrative duties, in addition to taking part in ordinary judicial proceedings.

The courts of Northern Ireland are the civil and criminal courts responsible for the administration of justice in Northern Ireland: they are constituted and governed by the law of Northern Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciaries of the United Kingdom</span> Systems of courts of law in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland

The judiciaries of the United Kingdom are the separate judiciaries of the three legal systems in England and Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland. The judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the Special Immigration Appeals Commission, Employment Tribunals, Employment Appeal Tribunal and the UK tribunals system do have a United Kingdom–wide jurisdiction but judgments only apply directly to the jurisdiction from which a case originates as the same case points and principles do not inevitably apply in the other jurisdictions. In employment law, employment tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal have jurisdiction in the whole of Great Britain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom</span> The judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Justices of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom are the judges of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom other than the president and the deputy president of the court. The Supreme Court is the highest court of the United Kingdom for all civil cases, and for criminal cases from the jurisdictions of England and Wales and Northern Ireland. Judges are appointed by the British monarch on the advice of the prime minister, who receives recommendations from a selection commission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Roderick L. Ireland</span> American judge

Roderick L. Ireland is a former Chief Justice of the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, and the first African American to serve that position. He was nominated for Chief Justice by Governor Deval Patrick on November 4, 2010, and sworn in on December 20. He retired from service on the court on July 25, 2014.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donal O'Donnell</span> Chief Justice of Ireland since 2021

Donal Gerard O'Donnell is an Irish judge who is the Chief Justice of Ireland since October 2021. He has served as a Judge of the Supreme Court of Ireland since January 2010. He practised as a barrister between 1982 and 2010, specialising in commercial law and public law.

The Court of Appeal is a court in Ireland that sits between the High Court and Supreme Court. Its jurisdiction derives from Article 34.4. It was established in 2014, taking over the existing appellate jurisdiction of the Supreme Court in 2014 and replacing the Court of Criminal Appeal and the Courts-Martial Appeal Court. Appeals to the Supreme Court are at that Court's discretion.

<i>R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union</i> Constitutional decision of Supreme Court

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union as prescribed by Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union without an Act of Parliament giving the government Parliament's permission to do so. Two days later, the government responded by bringing to Parliament the European Union Act 2017 for first reading in the House of Commons on 26 January 2017. The case is informally referred to as "the Miller case" or "Miller I".

References

  1. "Supreme Court of Ireland, 2018 Annual Report" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 December 2019. Retrieved 15 May 2020.