Macy conferences

Last updated

The Macy conferences were a set of meetings of scholars from various academic disciplines held in New York under the direction of Frank Fremont-Smith at the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation starting in 1941 and ending in 1960. The explicit aim of the conferences was to promote meaningful communication across scientific disciplines, [1] and restore unity to science. [2] There were different sets of conferences designed to cover specific topics, for a total of 160 conferences over the 19 years this program was active; [3] the phrase "Macy conference" does not apply only to those on cybernetics, although it is sometimes used that way informally by those familiar only with that set of events. Disciplinary isolation within medicine was viewed as particularly problematic by the Macy Foundation, and given that their mandate was to aid medical research, they decided to do something about it. [4] Thus other topics covered in different sets of conferences included: aging, adrenal cortex, biological antioxidants, blood clotting, blood pressure, connective tissues, infancy and childhood, liver injury, metabolic interrelations, nerve impulse, problems of consciousness, and renal function. [5]

Contents

Overview

The Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation developed two innovations specifically designed to encourage and facilitate interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary exchanges; one was oral: the Macy conferences, and one was written: the Macy transactions (published transcriptions of the conferences). Macy conferences were essentially conversations held in a conference setting, with participants presenting research while it was still in process (rather than after it had been completed). These were more formal than conversations (papers were prepared ahead of time and circulated) but less formal than conferences. Macy transactions were transcriptions widely circulated to those who could not attend. These were far more informal than typical proceedings, which publish revised versions of conference papers, and served to invite additional scholars into the exchange. The explicit goal was to let a wider audience hear the experts exchange ideas and think out loud about their own work. [6] But even participants themselves found the transactions valuable, as a way to prompt memories, and to catch comments they might have missed. [7] A few comments were made explicitly referring to later publication of the conference discussions, so clearly participants took this into account. However, Fremont-Smith explicitly stated that actual discussion should always take priority. [8]

Participants were leading scientists from a wide range of fields. Casual recollections of several participants as well as published comments in the Transactions volumes stress the communicative difficulties in the beginning of each set of conferences, giving way to the gradual establishment of a common language powerful enough to communicate the intricacies of the various fields of expertise present. Participants were deliberately chosen for their willingness to engage in interdisciplinary conversations, or for having formal training in multiple disciplines, and many brought relevant past experiences (gained either from earlier Macy conferences or other venues). As participants became more secure in their ability to understand one another over the course of a set of conferences on a single topic, their willingness to think outside their own specializations meant that creativity increased. [9]

Conference topics

Cerebral Inhibition Meeting

The Macy Cybernetics Conferences were preceded by the Cerebral Inhibition Meeting, organized by Frank Fremont-Smith and Lawrence K. Frank, and held on 13–15 May 1942. [10] Those invited were Gregory Bateson, Frank Beach, Carl Binger, Felix Deutsch, Flanders Dunbar, Julie Eisenbud, Carlyla Jacobsen, Lawrence Kubie, Jules Masserman, Margaret Mead, Warren McCulloch, Bela Mittelmann, David Rapoport, Arturo Rosenblueth, Donald Sheehan, Georg Soule, Robert White, John Whitehorn, and Harold Wolff. [10] There were two topics:

Cybernetics Conferences

The Cybernetics conferences were held between 1946 and 1953, organized by the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, motivated by Lawrence K. Frank and Frank Fremont-Smith of the Foundation. [11] As chair of this set of conferences, Warren McCulloch had responsibility to ensure that disciplinary boundaries were crossed. [12] [13] The Cybernetics were particularly complex as a result of bringing together the most diverse group of participants of any of the Macy conferences, so they were the most difficult to organize and maintain. [14]

The principal purpose of these series of conferences was to set the foundations for a general science of the workings of the human mind. [15] These were one of the first organized studies of interdisciplinarity, spawning breakthroughs in systems theory, cybernetics, and what later became known as cognitive science.[ citation needed ]

One of the topics spanning a majority of the conferences was reflexivity. Claude Shannon, one of the attendees, had previously worked on information theory and laid one of the initial frameworks for the Cybernetic Conferences by postulating information as a probabilistic element which reduced the uncertainty from a set of choices (i.e. being told a statement is true, or even false, completely reduces the ambiguity of its message).

Other conference members, especially Donald MacKay, sought to reconcile Shannon's view of information, which they called selective information, with theirs of 'structural' information which signified how selective information was to be understood  (i.e. a true statement might acquire additional meanings in varied settings though the information exchanged itself has not changed). The addition of meaning into the concept of information necessarily brought the role of the observer into the Macy Conferences. MacKay argued that by receiving and interpreting a message, the observer and the information they perceived ceased to exist independently of one another. The individual reading and processing the information does so relative to their preexisting internal state, consisting of what they already know and have experienced, and only then acts.

MacKay further muddled the role of information and its meaning by introducing the idea of reflexivity and feedback loops into his thought experiment. By claiming that the influence of the original message on the initial observer could be perceived by a separate individual, MacKay turned the second individual into an additional observer which could be elicited to react just how the initial observer did, a reaction that could then further be observed by a nested doll of observers ad infinitum. [16]

Reflexive feedback loops continued to come up during the Macy Conferences and became a prominent issue during its later discussions as well, most notably in the discussions regarding behavioral patterns of the human mind.

Warren McCulloch and Walter Pitts, also attendees, had previously worked on designing the first mathematical schema of a neuron based on the idea that each neuron had a threshold level that was to be reached, via excitation signals from incoming neurons, before firing its own signal onto others. Similarly to how Shannon had previously proven with his work in relay and switch circuits, McCulloch and Pitts proved that neural networks were capable of carrying out any boolean algebra calculations. [17]

At the Macy Conferences, McCulloch proposed that the firing of a neuron can be associated with an event or interaction taking place in the external world which provides sensory stimulus that is then picked up by the nervous system and processed by the neurons. But McCulloch also showed how a neural network's signal pathway could be set up reflexively with itself causing the neurons to continuously fire onto each other in a 'reverberating' circular feedback loop without any original 'firing' signal or any new additional incoming signals. McCulloch claimed this accounted for conscious phenomena in which individuals' world view, or the reaffirmation of their senses' perceived external stimulus, was cognitively distorted or all together missing as seen in individuals with phantom limb syndrome (claiming to feel an arm that has been amputated or lost) or hallucinations (perceived sensory stimulus without an original external signal). [18] Lawrence Kubie, another attending conference member and a psychiatrist, noted how repetitive and obsessive behaviors manifesting themselves in neurotics bore a resemblance to the behavior enacted by McCulloch's 'reverberating' loops.

Shannon had developed a maze-solving device which attendees of the Macy Conferences likened to a rat. Shannon's 'rat' was designed and programmed to find its marked goal when dropped at any point in a maze by giving it the ability to recall on past experiences, previous paths it had taken around the maze, so as to help it reach its endpoint - which it did repeatedly. [19]

Though goal-oriented, Shannon showed how his rat's design was prone to erratic behavior that negated its original function entirely via reflexive feedback loops. If Shannon's rat encountered itself in a path in which its 'memory' failed to fire correctly, that is to recall the paths which lead it to its goal, it would get stuck in an endless loop chasing its tail. [20] Completely abandoning its goal-oriented design, Shannon's rat had seemingly become neurotic.

The Macy Conferences failed to reconcile the subjectivity of information (its meaning) and that of the human mind but succeeding in showing how concepts such as that of the observer, reflexivity, black box systems, and neural networks would have to be approached in conjunction and eventually overcome in order to form a complete working theory of the mind. [21] The Macy Conferences were discontinued shortly after the ninth conference.

  • First Cybernetics Conference, 21–22 March 1946. Titled "Feedback Mechanisms and Circular Causal Systems in Biological and Social Systems". [22]
  • Second Cybernetics Conference, 17–18 October 1946. Title changed to "Teleological Mechanisms and Circular Causal Systems"
  • Third Cybernetics Conference, 13–14 March 1947.
  • Fourth Cybernetics Conference, 23–24 October 1947. Title changed to "Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems".
  • Fifth Cybernetics Conference, 18–19 March 1948
  • Sixth Cybernetics Conference, 24–25 March 1949
  • Seventh Cybernetics Conference, 23–24 March 1950. Title changed to "Cybernetics: Circular Causal and Feedback Mechanisms in Biological and Social Systems".
  • Eighth Cybernetics Conference, 15–16 March 1951
  • Ninth Cybernetics Conference, 20–21 March 1952
  • Tenth Cybernetics Conference, 22–24 April 1953

Participants: (as members or guests) in at least one of the Cybernetics conferences: Harold Alexander Abramson, Ackerman, Vahe E. Amassian, William Ross Ashby, Yehoshua Bar-Hillel, Gregory Bateson, Alex Bavelas, Julian H. Bigelow, Herbert G. Birch, John R. Bowman, Henry W. Brosin, Yuen Ren Chao (who memorably recited the Lion-Eating Poet in the Stone Den ), Jan Droogleever-Fortuyn, M. Ericsson, Fitch, Lawrence K. Frank, Ralph Waldo Gerard, William Grey Walter, Molly Harrower, George Evelyn Hutchinson, Heinrich Klüver, Lawrence S. Kubie, Paul Lazarsfeld, Kurt Lewin, J. C. R. Licklider, Howard S. Liddell, Donald B. Lindsley, W. K. Livingston, David Lloyd, Rafael Lorente de Nó, R. Duncan Luce, Donald M. MacKay, Donald G. Marquis, Warren S. McCulloch, Turner McLardy, Margaret Mead, Frederick A. Mettier, Marcel Monnier, Oskar Morgenstern, F. S. C. Northrop, Walter Pitts, Henry Quastler, Antoine Remond, I. A. Richards, David McKenzie Rioch, Arturo Rosenblueth, Leonard J. Savage, T. C. Schneirla, Claude Shannon, John Stroud, Hans-Lukas Teuber, Mottram Torre, Gerhardt von Bonin, Heinz von Foerster, John von Neumann, Heinz Werner, Norbert Wiener, Jerome B. Wiesner, J. Z. Young

This is a sampling of the topics discussed each year. [15]

1946, March (NYC)
1946, October (NYC)
1947, March (NYC)
1947, October (NYC)
1948, Spring (NYC)
  • Formation of "I" in language
  • Formal modeling applied to chicken pecking order formation
1949, March (NYC)
  • Are the number of neurons and their connections sufficient to account for human capacities?
  • Memory
  • An appeal for collaboration between physics and psychology
1950, March (NYC)
1951, March (NYC)
  • Information as semantic
  • Can automatons engage in deductive logic?
  • Decision theory
  • Feedforward
  • Small group dynamics and group communications
  • The applicability of game theory to psychic motivations
  • The type of language needed to analyze language
  • Mere behavior vs. true communication
  • Is psychiatry scientific?
  • Can a mental event that creates a memory ever be unconscious?
1952, March (NYC)
  • The relation of neurophysiological details to broad issues in philosophy and epistemology
  • The relation of cybernetics at the microlevel to biochemical and cellular processes
  • The complexity of organisms as a function of information
  • Humor, communication, and paradox
  • Do chess playing automatons need randomness to defeat humans?
  • Homeostasis and learning
1953, April (Princeton)
  • Studies on the activity of the brain [23]
  • Semantic information and its measures [23]
  • Meaning in language and how its acquired [23]
  • How neural mechanisms can recognize shapes and musical chords
  • What consensus, if any, the Macy Conferences have arrived at

Some of the researchers present at the cybernetics conferences later went on to do extensive government-funded research on the psychological effects of LSD, and its potential as a tool for interrogation and psychological manipulation in such projects as the CIA's MKULTRA program. [24]

Neuropharmacological Conferences

Five annual Neuropharmacological Conferences took place from 1954 to 1959 with a skipped year in 1958. While the conferences have developed a reputation as being primarily about LSD, [25] the drug was discussed extensively at the second conference and was not the primary focus of most of the sessions. In the first conference, for instance, reference to LSD appears only one time, as a side comment during discussion. [26]

First Neuropharmacological Conference, 26–28 May 1954

Participants: Hudson Hoagland (Chairman), Harold A. Abramson (Secretary), Philip Bard (absent), Henry K. Beecher (absent), Mary A. B. Brazier, G. L. Cantoni, Ralph W. Gerard, Roy R. Grinker, Seymour S. Kety, Chauncey D. Leake (absent), Horace W. Magoun, Amedeo S. Marrazzi, I. Arthur Mirsky, J. H. Quastel (absent), Orr E. Reynolds, Curt P. Richter (absent), Ernst A. Scharrer, David Shakow (absent)

Guests: Charles D. Aring, William Borberg, Enoch Callaway III, Conan Kornetsky, Joost A. M. Meerloo, John I. Nurnberger, Carl C. Pfeiffer, Anatol Rapoport, Maurice H. Seevers, Richard Trumbull [27]

Topics: "Considerations of the Effects of Pharmacological Agents on the Over-All Circulation and Metabolism of the Brain" (Seymour Kety) "Functional Organization of the Brain" (Ernest A. Scharrer) "Studies of Electrical Activity of the Brain in Relation to Anesthesia" (Mary A. B. Brazier) "Ascending Reticular System and Anesthesia (Horace W. Magoun) "Observations on New CNS Convulsants" (Carl C. Pfeiffer) [28]

Group Processes Conferences

The Group Processes Conferences were held between 1954 and 1960. They are of particular interest due to the element of reflexivity: participants were interested in their own functioning as a group, and made numerous comments about their understanding of how Macy conferences were designed to work. For example, there were a series of jokes made about the disease afflicting them all, interdisciplinitis, [29] or how multidisciplinarian researchers were neither fish nor fowl. [30] When Erving Goffman made a guest appearance at the Third conference, he explicitly prefaced his comments by saying that his ideas were partly speculative, and Frank Fremont-Smith responded by stating that their goal was to discuss ideas that had not been crystallized. [31]

  • First Group Processes Conference, 26–30 September 1954
  • Second Group Processes Conference, 9–12 October 1955
  • Third Group Processes Conference, 7–10 October 1956
  • Fourth Group Processes Conference, 13–16 October 1957
  • Fifth Group Processes Conference, 12–15 October 1960

Participants: (as members or guests) in at least one of the Group Processes conferences: Grace Baker, Donald H. Barron, Gregory Bateson, Alex Bavelas, Frank A. Beach, Leo Berman, Ray L. Birdwhistell, Robert L. Blake, Helen Blauvelt, Jerome S. Bruner, George W. Boguslavsky, Charlotte Bühler, Eliot D. Chapple, Stanley Cobb, Nicholas E. Collias, Jocelyn Crane, Erik H. Erikson, L. Thomas Evans, Jerome Frank, Frank S. Freeman, Frieda Fromm-Reichmann, Erving Goffman, Arthur D. Hasler, Eckhard H. Hess, Sol Kramer, Daniel S. Lehrman, Seymour Levy, Howard Liddell, Robert Jay Lifton, Margarethe Lorenz, Konrad Z. Lorenz, William D. Lotspeich, Ernst Mayr, Margaret Mead, Joost A. M. Meerloo, I. Arthur Mirsky, Horst Mittelstaedt, A. Ulric Moore, R. C. Murphy, Harris B. Peck, Karl H. Pribram, Fritz Redl, Julius B. Richmond, Bertram Schaffner, T. C. Schneirla, Theodore Schwartz, William J. L. Sladen, Robert J. Smith, John P. Spiegel, H. Burr Steinbach, Niko Tinbergen, Mottram P. Torre, William Grey Walter, E. P. Wheeler, II.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Margaret Mead</span> American cultural anthropologist (1901–1978)

Margaret Mead was an American cultural anthropologist, author and speaker, who appeared frequently in the mass media during the 1960s and the 1970s.

Warren Sturgis McCulloch was an American Neuropsychologist and cybernetician known for his work on the foundation for certain brain theories and his contribution to the cybernetics movement. Along with Walter Pitts, McCulloch created computational models based on mathematical algorithms called threshold logic which split the inquiry into two distinct approaches, one approach focused on biological processes in the brain and the other focused on the application of neural networks to artificial intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heinz von Foerster</span> Austrian-American scientist and cybernetician (1911–2002)

Heinz von Foerster was an Austrian-American scientist combining physics and philosophy, and widely attributed as the originator of second-order cybernetics. He was twice a Guggenheim fellow and also was a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1980. He is well known for his 1960 Doomsday equation formula published in Science predicting future population growth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gregory Bateson</span> British-American psychological anthropologist (1904–1980)

Gregory Bateson was an English anthropologist, social scientist, linguist, visual anthropologist, semiotician, and cyberneticist whose work intersected that of many other fields. His writings include Steps to an Ecology of Mind (1972) and Mind and Nature (1979).

Harold Alexander Abramson was an American physician, remembered as an early advocate of therapeutic LSD. He played a significant role in the CIA's MKULTRA program to investigate the possible applications for LSD.

Second-order cybernetics, also known as the cybernetics of cybernetics, is the recursive application of cybernetics to itself and the reflexive practice of cybernetics according to such a critique. It is cybernetics where "the role of the observer is appreciated and acknowledged rather than disguised, as had become traditional in western science". Second-order cybernetics was developed between the late 1960s and mid 1970s by Heinz von Foerster and others, with key inspiration coming from Margaret Mead. Foerster referred to it as "the control of control and the communication of communication" and differentiated first-order cybernetics as "the cybernetics of observed systems" and second-order cybernetics as "the cybernetics of observing systems".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jerome Wiesner</span> American electrical engineer, science policy adviser, and university president

Jerome Bert Wiesner was a professor of electrical engineering, chosen by President John F. Kennedy as chairman of his Science Advisory Committee (PSAC). Educated at the University of Michigan, Wiesner was associate director of the university's radio broadcasting service and provided electronic and acoustical assistance to the National Music Camp at Interlochen, Michigan. During World War II, he worked on microwave radar development at the MIT Radiation Laboratory. He worked briefly after the war at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, then returned to MIT's Research Laboratory of Electronics from 1946 to 1961. After serving as Kennedy's science advisor, he returned to MIT, becoming its president from 1971 to 1980.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Management cybernetics</span> Application of cybernetics to management and organizations

Management cybernetics is concerned with the application of cybernetics to management and organizations. "Management cybernetics" was first introduced by Stafford Beer in the late 1950s and introduces the various mechanisms of self-regulation applied by and to organizational settings, as seen through a cybernetics perspective. Beer developed the theory through a combination of practical applications and a series of influential books. The practical applications involved steel production, publishing and operations research in a large variety of different industries. Some consider that the full flowering of management cybernetics is represented in Beer's books. However, learning continues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stuart Umpleby</span>

Stuart Anspach Umpleby is an American cybernetician and professor in the Department of Management and Director of the Research Program in Social and Organizational Learning in the School of Business at the George Washington University.

Ray L. Birdwhistell was an American anthropologist who founded kinesics as a field of inquiry and research. Birdwhistell coined the term kinesics, meaning "facial expression, gestures, posture and gait, and visible arm and body movements". He estimated that "no more than 30 to 35 percent of the social meaning of a conversation or an interaction is carried by the words." Stated more broadly, he argued that "words are not the only containers of social knowledge." He proposed other technical terms, including kineme, and many others less frequently used today. Birdwhistell had at least as much impact on the study of language and social interaction generally as just nonverbal communication because he was interested in the study of communication more broadly than is often recognized. Birdwhistell understood body movements to be culturally patterned rather than universal. His students were required to read widely, sources not only in communication but also anthropology and linguistics. "Birdwhistell himself was deeply disappointed that his general communicative interests and goals were not appropriately understood." Collaborations with others, including initially Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, and later, Erving Goffman and Dell Hymes had huge influence on his work. For example, the book he is best known for, Kinesics and Context, "would not have appeared if it had not been envisaged by Erving Goffman" and he explicitly stated "the paramount and sustaining influence upon my work has been that of anthropological linguistics", a tradition most directly represented at the University of Pennsylvania by Hymes.

Frank Fremont-Smith was an American administrator, executive with the Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, president of British General Rees's World Federation of Mental Health, known together with Lawrence K. Frank as motivators of the Macy conferences, and as promoter for interdisciplinary conferences as platforms for advancing knowledge.

The Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, or Macy Foundation, is a private, philanthropic grantmaking organization founded in 1930 by Kate Macy Ladd (1863–1945) in honor of her father, Josiah W. Macy Jr. It is the only national foundation dedicated solely to improving the education of health professionals. The current president is Holly J. Humphrey, MD, MACP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Society for Cybernetics</span> Organization that advances cybernetics as a science

The American Society for Cybernetics (ASC) is an American non-profit scholastic organization for the advancement of cybernetics as a science, a discipline, a meta-discipline and the promotion of cybernetics as basis for an interdisciplinary discourse. The society does this by developing and applying cybernetics’ concepts which are presented and published via its conferences and peer-reviewed publications. As a meta-discipline, it creates bridges between disciplines, philosophies, sciences, and arts. The ASC is a full member of the International Federation for Systems Research (IFSR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cybernetics</span> Transdisciplinary field concerned with regulatory and purposive systems

Cybernetics is the transdisciplinary study of circular processes such as feedback systems where outputs are also inputs. It is concerned with general principles that are relevant across multiple contexts, including in ecological, technological, biological, cognitive and social systems and also in practical activities such as designing, learning, and managing.

Meta-communication is a secondary communication about how a piece of information is meant to be interpreted. It is based on the idea that the same message accompanied by different meta-communication can mean something entirely different, including its opposite, as in irony. The term was brought to prominence by Gregory Bateson to refer to "communication about communication", which he expanded to: "all exchanged cues and propositions about (a) codification and (b) relationship between the communicators". Meta-communication may or may not be congruent with, supportive of, or contradictory to that verbal communication.

The Biological Computer Laboratory (BCL) was a research institute of the Department of Electrical Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign. It was founded on 1 January 1958, by then Professor of Electrical Engineering Heinz von Foerster. He was head of BCL until his retirement in 1975.

Lawrence Kelso Frank was an American social scientist, administrator, and parent educator, particularly known as vice-president of the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation and together with Frank Fremont-Smith initiator of the Macy conferences.

The Symposium on Principles of Self-Organization was held at Allerton House on 8–9 June 1960. It was a key conference in the development of cybernetics and was in many ways a continuation of the Macy Conferences. it was organised by Heinz von Foerster through the Biological Computer Laboratory based at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. It was sponsored by the Information Systems Branch of the U.S. Office of Naval Research.

Lawrence Schlesinger Kubie was an American psychiatrist and psychoanalyst who practiced in New York City from 1930 to 1959. Kubie had several celebrity patients, including Tennessee Williams, Leonard Bernstein, Moss Hart, Kurt Weill, Vivien Leigh and Sid Caesar.

Feedforward is the provision of context of what one wants to communicate prior to that communication. In purposeful activity, feedforward creates an expectation which the actor anticipates. When expected experience occurs, this provides confirmatory feedback.

References

  1. ↑ von Foerster, H., Mead, M., & Teuber, H. L. (Eds.). (1951). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the seventh conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. vii
  2. ↑ Fremont-Smith, F. (1960). The Macy Foundation conference plan. In M. Capes (Ed.), Communication or conflict: Conferences, their nature, dynamics and planning. New York: Association Press, pp. 218-19.
  3. ↑ Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation. (1960). A review of activities, 1956-1960. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 7
  4. ↑ von Foerster, H., Mead, M., & Teuber, H. L. (Eds.). (1952). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the eighth conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. vii.
  5. ↑ von Foerster, H., Mead, M., & Teuber, H. L. (Eds.). (1951). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback metchanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the seventh Conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 7
  6. ↑ Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation (1955). "The conference program". Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation 1930-1955: A review of activities. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation. p. 23.
  7. ↑ Schaffner, B. (Ed.). (1956). Group processes: Transactions of the second conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 13.
  8. ↑ von Foerster, H., Mead, M., & Teuber, H. L. (Eds.). (1950). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the sixth conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, pp. 9-10.
  9. ↑ von Foerster, H., Mead, M., & Teuber, H. L. (Eds.). (1954). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the tenth Conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 12.
  10. 1 2 Heims, Steve J. (1993) [1991]. Constructing a social science for postwar America : the cybernetics group, 1946-1953. Heims, Steve J. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN   0-585-31475-6. OCLC   45727695.
  11. ↑ HISTORY OF CYBERNETICS by the American Society for Cybernetics, retrieved 15 April 2008
  12. ↑ von Foerster, H., Mead, M., & Teuber, H. L. (Eds.). (1952). Cybernetics: Circular causal and feedback mechanisms in biological and social systems. Transactions of the eighth conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. xix.
  13. ↑ Bateson, G., & Mead, M. (1976). For God's sake, Margaret. Co-Evolution Quarterly, 32-44.
  14. ↑ Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation (1955). "The conference program". Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation 1930-1955: A review of activities. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation. p. 21.
  15. 1 2 "Summary: The Macy Conferences at asc-cybernetics.org. Accessed Dec 21, 2012". Asc-cybernetics.org. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  16. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman . University of Chicago Press. pp.  55. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001. ISBN   9780226321462.
  17. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman . University of Chicago Press. pp.  58. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001. ISBN   9780226321462.
  18. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman . University of Chicago Press. pp.  59. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001. ISBN   9780226321462.
  19. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman . University of Chicago Press. pp.  64. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001. ISBN   9780226321462.
  20. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman . University of Chicago Press. pp.  65. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001. ISBN   9780226321462.
  21. ↑ Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman . University of Chicago Press. pp.  69. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001. ISBN   9780226321462.
  22. ↑ "Summary: The Macy Conferences". asc-cybernetics.org. Retrieved 14 October 2024.
  23. 1 2 3 Pias, Claus (2003). Cybernetics | The Macy-Conferences 1946-1953. Zurich-Berlin: Diaphanes. ISBN   3037345985.
  24. ↑ Unsworth, John M., "LSD, Mind Control, and the Internet: A Chronology", handout with "Information Theory, Postmodernism, and Mind Control (or, What LSD, Mass Media, and the Internet Have in Common)," presented at the 1994 Conference of the Society for Literature and Science, New Orleans, LA, November, 1994. Archived from the original.
  25. ↑ Glaser, Gilbert (September 1955). "Neuropharmacology - Transactions of the first conference". The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 28 (1): 78–79. Retrieved 4 March 2013.
  26. ↑ Abramson, Harold A., Editor. Neuropharmacology: Transactions of the First Conference (New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, 1955): pp. 189-90.
  27. ↑ Abramson, Harold A., Editor. Neuropharmacology: Transactions of the First Conference (New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, 1955)
  28. ↑ Abramson, Harold A., Editor. Neuropharmacology: Transactions of the First Conference (New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, 1955)
  29. ↑ Schaffner, B. (Ed.). (1957). Group processes: Transactions of the third conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 10
  30. ↑ Schaffner, B. (Ed.). (1955). Group processes: Transactions of the first conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 307.
  31. ↑ Schaffner, B. (Ed.). (1957). Group processes: Transactions of the third conference. New York: Josiah Macy, Jr. Foundation, p. 144.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.