Magnetofection

Last updated

Magnetofection is a transfection method that uses magnetic fields to concentrate particles containing vectors to target cells in the body. [1] Magnetofection has been adapted to a variety of vectors, including nucleic acids, non-viral transfection systems, and viruses. This method offers advantages such as high transfection efficiency and biocompatibility which are balanced with limitations.

Contents

Mechanism

Principle

The term magnetofection, currently trademarked by the company OZ Biosciences, combines the words magnetic and transfection. [2] Magnetofection uses nucleic acids associated with magnetic nanoparticles. These molecular complexes are then concentrated and transported into cells using an applied magnetic field.

Synthesis

The magnetic nanoparticles are typically made from iron oxide, which is fully biodegradable, using methods such as coprecipitation or microemulsion. [3] [4]

The nanoparticles are then combined with gene vectors (DNA, siRNA, ODN, virus, etc.). One method involves linking viral particles to magnetic particles using an avidin-biotin interaction. [5] Viruses can also bind to the nanoparticles via hydrophobic interaction. [6]

Another synthesis method involves coating magnetic nanoparticles with cationic lipids or polymers via salt-induced aggregation. For example, nanoparticles may be conjugated with the polyethylenimine (PEI), a positively charged polymer used commonly as a transfection agent. [7] The PEI solution must have a high pH during synthesis to encourage high gene expression. [8] The positively charged nanoparticles can then associate with negatively charged nucleic acids via electrostatic interaction. [9]

The process of magnetofection. Magnet concentrates nanoparticles with gene vectors to cells for transfection. Magnetofection with labels.png
The process of magnetofection. Magnet concentrates nanoparticles with gene vectors to cells for transfection.

Cellular uptake

Magnetic particles loaded with vectors are concentrated on the target cells by the influence of an external magnetic field. The cells then take up genetic material naturally via endocytosis and pinocytosis. Consequently, membrane architecture and structure stays intact, in contrast to other physical transfection methods such as electroporation or gene guns that damage the cell membrane. [10]

The nucleic acids are then released into the cytoplasm by different mechanisms depending upon the formulation used:

  1. the proton sponge effect caused by cationic polymers coated on the nanoparticles that promote endosome osmotic swelling, disruption of the endosome membrane and intracellular release of DNA form,
  2. the destabilization of endosome by cationic lipids coated on the particles that release the nucleic acid into cells by flip-flop of cell negative lipids and charge neutralization and
  3. the viral infection mechanism.

Magnetofection works with cells that are not dividing or slowly dividing, meaning that the genetic materials can go to the cell nucleus without cell division. [11]

Applications

Magnetofection has been tested on a broad range of cell lines, hard-to-transfect and primary cells. [12] Several optimized and efficient magnetic nanoparticle formulations have been specifically developed for several types of applications such as DNA, siRNA, and primary neuron transfection as well as viral applications. [13]

Magnetofection research is currently in the preclinical stage. This technique has primarily been tested in vivo using plasmid DNA in mouse, rat, and rabbit models for applications in the hippocampus, subcutaneous tumors, lungs, spinal cord, and muscle. [14]

Neural stem cells growing in culture. Neural Stem Cells.jpg
Neural stem cells growing in culture.

Some applications include:

Advantages

Magnetofection attempts to unite the advantages of biochemical (cationic lipids or polymers) and physical (electroporation, gene gun) transfection methods. It allows for local delivery with high transfection efficiency, faster incubation time, and biocompatibility. [19]

Transfection efficiency

Coupling magnetic nanoparticles to gene vectors results in hundreds-fold increase of the uptake of these vectors on a time scale of minutes, thus leading to high transfection efficiency. [20] Gene vector and magnetic nanoparticle complexes are transfected into cells after 10–15 minutes, which is faster than the 2–4 hours that other transfection methods require. [21] After 24, 48 or 72 hours, most of the particles are localized in the cytoplasm, in vacuoles (membranes surrounded structure into cells) and occasionally in the cell nucleus. [22]

Biocompatibility

Magnetic nanoparticles do not aggregate easily once the magnet is removed, and therefore are unlikely to block capillaries or cause thrombosis. [23] In addition, iron oxide is biodegradable, and the iron can be reused in hemoglobin or iron metabolism pathways. [24] [25]

Disadvantages

Particle variability

Magnetic nanoparticle synthesis can sometimes lead to a wide range of differently sized particles. [26] The size of particles can influence their usefulness. Specifically, nanoparticles that are less than 10 nm or greater than 200 nm in size tend to be cleared from the body more quickly. [27]

Localization in vivo

While magnets can be used to localize magnetic nanoparticles to desired cells, this mechanism may be difficult to maintain in practice. The nanoparticles can be concentrated in 2D space such as on a culture plate or at the surface of the body, but it can be more difficult to localize them in the 3D space of the body. Magnetofection does not work well for organs or blood vessels far from the surface of the body, since the magnetic field weakens as distance increases. [28] [29] In addition, the user must consider the frequency and timing of applying the magnetic field, as the particles will not necessarily stay in the desired location once the magnet is removed. [30]

Cytotoxicity

While iron oxide used to make nanoparticles is biodegradable, the toxicity of magnetic nanoparticles is still under investigation. Some research has found no signs of damage to cells, while others claim that small (< 2 nm) nanoparticles can diffuse across cell membranes and disrupt organelles. [31] [32]

In addition, very high concentrations of iron oxide can disrupt homeostasis and lead to iron overload, which can damage or alter DNA, affect cellular responses, and kill cells. [33] Lysosymes can also digest the nanoparticles and release free iron which can react with hydrogen peroxide to form free radicals, leading to cytotoxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic effects. [34]

References

  1. Plank C, Zelphati O, Mykhaylyk O (November 2011). "Magnetically enhanced nucleic acid delivery. Ten years of magnetofection-progress and prospects". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 63 (14–15): 1300–1331. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.08.002. PMC   7103316 . PMID   21893135.
  2. "MAGNETOFECTION Trademark of OZ BIOSCIENCES - Registration Number 5116540 - Serial Number 79182650 :: Justia Trademarks". trademarks.justia.com. Retrieved 2021-11-19.
  3. Arbab AS, Bashaw LA, Miller BR, Jordan EK, Lewis BK, Kalish H, Frank JA (December 2003). "Characterization of biophysical and metabolic properties of cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles and transfection agent for cellular MR imaging". Radiology. 229 (3): 838–846. doi:10.1148/radiol.2293021215. PMID   14657318.
  4. Majidi S, Sehrig FZ, Farkhani SM, Goloujeh MS, Akbarzadeh A (2016-02-17). "Current methods for synthesis of magnetic nanoparticles". Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology. 44 (2): 722–734. doi:10.3109/21691401.2014.982802. PMID   25435409. S2CID   31332211.
  5. Mah C, Fraites TJ, Zolotukhin I, Song S, Flotte TR, Dobson J, et al. (July 2002). "Improved method of recombinant AAV2 delivery for systemic targeted gene therapy". Molecular Therapy. 6 (1): 106–112. doi: 10.1006/mthe.2001.0636 . PMID   12095310.
  6. Agopian K, Wei BL, Garcia JV, Gabuzda D (March 2006). "A hydrophobic binding surface on the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef core is critical for association with p21-activated kinase 2". Journal of Virology. 80 (6): 3050–3061. doi:10.1128/jvi.80.6.3050-3061.2006. PMC   1395437 . PMID   16501114.
  7. Cui Y, Li X, Zeljic K, Shan S, Qiu Z, Wang Z (October 2019). "Effect of PEGylated Magnetic PLGA-PEI Nanoparticles on Primary Hippocampal Neurons: Reduced Nanoneurotoxicity and Enhanced Transfection Efficiency with Magnetofection". ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 11 (41): 38190–38204. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b15014. PMID   31550131. S2CID   202762218.
  8. Prosen, Lara; Prijic, Sara; Music, Branka; Lavrencak, Jaka; Cemazar, Maja; Sersa, Gregor (2013-06-03). "Magnetofection: A Reproducible Method for Gene Delivery to Melanoma Cells". BioMed Research International. 2013: e209452. doi: 10.1155/2013/209452 . ISSN   2314-6133. PMC   3686069 . PMID   23862136.
  9. Scherer F, Anton M, Schillinger U, Henke J, Bergemann C, Krüger A, et al. (January 2002). "Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo". Gene Therapy. 9 (2): 102–109. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301624. PMID   11857068. S2CID   1565485.
  10. Fus-Kujawa, Agnieszka; Prus, Pawel; Bajdak-Rusinek, Karolina; Teper, Paulina; Gawron, Katarzyna; Kowalczuk, Agnieszka; Sieron, Aleksander L. (2021-07-20). "An Overview of Methods and Tools for Transfection of Eukaryotic Cells in vitro". Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. 9: 701031. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.701031 . ISSN   2296-4185. PMC   8330802 . PMID   34354988.
  11. Fajrial, Apresio K.; He, Qing Qing; Wirusanti, Nurul I.; Slansky, Jill E.; Ding, Xiaoyun (2020). "A review of emerging physical transfection methods for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing". Theranostics. 10 (12): 5532–5549. doi:10.7150/thno.43465. ISSN   1838-7640. PMC   7196308 . PMID   32373229.
  12. Plank C, Anton M, Rudolph C, Rosenecker J, Krötz F (August 2003). "Enhancing and targeting nucleic acid delivery by magnetic force". Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy. 3 (5): 745–758. doi:10.1517/14712598.3.5.745. PMID   12880375. S2CID   865185.
  13. Plank, Christian; Zelphati, Olivier; Mykhaylyk, Olga (2011-11-01). "Magnetically enhanced nucleic acid delivery. Ten years of magnetofection—Progress and prospects". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. Hybrid nanostructures for diagnostics and therapeutics. 63 (14): 1300–1331. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.08.002. ISSN   0169-409X. PMC   7103316 . PMID   21893135.
  14. Sizikov AA, Kharlamova MV, Nikitin MP, Nikitin PI, Kolychev EL (April 2021). "Nonviral Locally Injected Magnetic Vectors for In Vivo Gene Delivery: A Review of Studies on Magnetofection". Nanomaterials. 11 (5): 1078. doi: 10.3390/nano11051078 . PMC   8143545 . PMID   33922066.
  15. Pickard, Mark R.; Adams, Christopher F.; Barraud, Perrine; Chari, Divya M. (2015). "Using Magnetic Nanoparticles for Gene Transfer to Neural Stem Cells: Stem Cell Propagation Method Influences Outcomes". Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 6 (2): 259–276. doi: 10.3390/jfb6020259 . PMC   4493511 . PMID   25918990.
  16. Krötz, Florian; Wit, Cor de; Sohn, Hae-Young; Zahler, Stefan; Gloe, Torsten; Pohl, Ulrich; Plank, Christian (2003-05-01). "Magnetofection—A highly efficient tool for antisense oligonucleotide delivery in vitro and in vivo". Molecular Therapy. 7 (5): 700–710. doi: 10.1016/S1525-0016(03)00065-0 . ISSN   1525-0016. PMID   12718913.
  17. Schillinger, Ulrike (2005). "Advances in magnetofection—magnetically guided nucleic acid delivery" . Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. 293 (1): 501–508. Bibcode:2005JMMM..293..501S. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2005.01.032. S2CID   122076397 via Elsivier.
  18. Scherer, F.; Anton, M.; Schillinger, U.; Henke, J.; Bergemann, C.; Krüger, A.; Gänsbacher, B.; Plank, C. (2002). "Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo" . Gene Therapy. 9 (2): 102–109. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301624. ISSN   1476-5462. PMID   11857068. S2CID   1565485.
  19. Plank, Christian; Zelphati, Olivier; Mykhaylyk, Olga (2011). "Magnetically enhanced nucleic acid delivery. Ten years of magnetofection—Progress and prospects". Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 63 (14): 1300–1331. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2011.08.002. ISSN   0169-409X. PMC   7103316 . PMID   21893135.
  20. Scherer, F.; Anton, M.; Schillinger, U.; Henke, J.; Bergemann, C.; Krüger, A.; Gänsbacher, B.; Plank, C. (2002). "Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo" . Gene Therapy. 9 (2): 102–109. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301624. ISSN   1476-5462. PMID   11857068. S2CID   1565485.
  21. Scherer, F.; Anton, M.; Schillinger, U.; Henke, J.; Bergemann, C.; Krüger, A.; Gänsbacher, B.; Plank, C. (2002). "Magnetofection: enhancing and targeting gene delivery by magnetic force in vitro and in vivo" . Gene Therapy. 9 (2): 102–109. doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3301624. ISSN   1476-5462. PMID   11857068. S2CID   1565485.
  22. Santori MI, Gonzalez C, Serrano L, Isalan M (2006-06-27). "Localized transfection with magnetic beads coated with PCR products and other nucleic acids". Nature Protocols. 1 (2): 526–531. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.74. PMID   17406278. S2CID   23641355.
  23. Wahajuddin; Arora, Sumit (2012). "Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers". International Journal of Nanomedicine. 7: 3445–3471. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30320 . ISSN   1176-9114. PMC   3405876 . PMID   22848170.
  24. Castillo, Betzaida; Bromberg, Lev; López, Xaira; Badillo, Valerie; González Feliciano, Jose A.; González, Carlos I.; Hatton, T. Alan; Barletta, Gabriel (2012-08-30). "Intracellular Delivery of siRNA by Polycationic Superparamagnetic Nanoparticles". Journal of Drug Delivery. 2012: e218940. doi: 10.1155/2012/218940 . ISSN   2090-3014. PMC   3437298 . PMID   22970377.
  25. Wahajuddin; Arora, Sumit (2012). "Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers". International Journal of Nanomedicine. 7: 3445–3471. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30320 . ISSN   1176-9114. PMC   3405876 . PMID   22848170.
  26. Prosen, Lara; Prijic, Sara; Music, Branka; Lavrencak, Jaka; Cemazar, Maja; Sersa, Gregor (2013-06-03). "Magnetofection: A Reproducible Method for Gene Delivery to Melanoma Cells". BioMed Research International. 2013: e209452. doi: 10.1155/2013/209452 . ISSN   2314-6133. PMC   3686069 . PMID   23862136.
  27. Yetisgin, Abuzer Alp; Cetinel, Sibel; Zuvin, Merve; Kosar, Ali; Kutlu, Ozlem (2020). "Therapeutic Nanoparticles and Their Targeted Delivery Applications". Molecules. 25 (9): 2193. doi: 10.3390/molecules25092193 . PMC   7248934 . PMID   32397080.
  28. Wahajuddin; Arora, Sumit (2012). "Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers". International Journal of Nanomedicine. 7: 3445–3471. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30320 . ISSN   1176-9114. PMC   3405876 . PMID   22848170.
  29. Mahmoudi, Morteza; Sant, Shilpa; Wang, Ben; Laurent, Sophie; Sen, Tapas (2011-01-01). "Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs): Development, surface modification and applications in chemotherapy" . Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2011 Editors' Collection. 63 (1): 24–46. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2010.05.006. ISSN   0169-409X. PMID   20685224.
  30. Schneider-Futschik, Elena K.; Reyes-Ortega, Felisa (2021). "Advantages and Disadvantages of Using Magnetic Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Complicated Ocular Disorders". Pharmaceutics. 13 (8): 1157. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081157 . PMC   8400382 . PMID   34452117.
  31. Wei, Hao; Hu (2021). "Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers". International Journal of Nanomedicine. 7: 3445–3471. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30320 . ISSN   1178-2013. PMC   3405876 . PMID   22848170.
  32. Wahajuddin; Arora, Sumit (2012-07-06). "Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers". International Journal of Nanomedicine. 7: 3445–3471. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S30320 . PMC   3405876 . PMID   22848170.
  33. Valdiglesias, Vanessa; Kiliç, Gözde; Costa, Carla; Fernández-Bertólez, Natalia; Pásaro, Eduardo; Teixeira, João Paulo; Laffon, Blanca (2015). "Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles: Cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, developmental toxicity, and neurotoxicity" . Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 56 (2): 125–148. Bibcode:2015EnvMM..56..125V. doi:10.1002/em.21909. hdl: 2183/39931 . ISSN   1098-2280. PMID   25209650. S2CID   46117152.
  34. Toyokuni, Shinya (1996-01-01). "Iron-induced carcinogenesis: The role of redox regulation" . Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 20 (4): 553–566. doi:10.1016/0891-5849(95)02111-6. ISSN   0891-5849. PMID   8904296.

Further reading

See also