Microbead

Last updated
Microbead legislation around the world
.mw-parser-output .legend{page-break-inside:avoid;break-inside:avoid-column}.mw-parser-output .legend-color{display:inline-block;min-width:1.25em;height:1.25em;line-height:1.25;margin:1px 0;text-align:center;border:1px solid black;background-color:transparent;color:black}.mw-parser-output .legend-text{}
Full ban
Manufacture and import ban
Regional manufacture, import, or sales ban Microbeads legislation world map.svg
Microbead legislation around the world
  Full ban
  Manufacture and import ban
  Regional manufacture, import, or sales ban

Microbeads are manufactured solid plastic particles of less than one millimeter in their largest dimension. [1] They are most frequently made of polyethylene but can be of other petrochemical plastics such as polypropylene and polystyrene. They are used in exfoliating personal care products, toothpastes, and in biomedical and health-science research. [2]

Contents

Microbeads can cause plastic particle water pollution and pose an environmental hazard for aquatic animals in freshwater and ocean water. In the United States, the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 phased out microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics by July 2017. [3] Several other countries have also banned microbeads from rinse-off cosmetics, including Canada, France, New Zealand, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom.

Types

A microbead imaged using scanning electron microscopy Plastic microbead Andrew Watts research.jpg
A microbead imaged using scanning electron microscopy

Microbeads are manufactured solid plastic particles of less than one millimeter in their largest dimension [4] when they are first created, and are typically created using material such as polyethylene (PE), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), nylon (PA), polypropylene (PP), and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). [5] The most frequently used materials are polyethylene or other petrochemical plastics such as polypropylene and polystyrene. [6] [7] Microbeads are commercially available in particle sizes from 10 micrometres (0.00039 in) to 1 millimetre (0.039 in). [8] Low melting temperature and fast phase transitions make them especially suitable for creating porous structures in ceramics and other materials. [9]

Regional differences

The parameters for what qualifies as a microbead change subtly based on location and the corresponding legal jurisdiction; minor distinctions in the definition may be encountered from one country to another. [10] For example, the U.S. official definition for a microbead, as per the Microbead-Free Waters Act 2015 laid out by Congress, is "any solid plastic particle less than 5 millimeters in size that was created with the intention of being used to exfoliate or cleanse the human body." [11] On the other hand, Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), the governmental agency responsible for Canada's microbead ban, settled on a definition which includes only plastics with diameters between 0.5 microns and 2 millimeters; although a diameter range of 0.1 microns to 5 millimeters was initially proposed, the definition was revised after consultation with members of industry and meeting resistance from plastic manufacturers who claimed that many of their raw materials (for example, those needed to make bottles for soft drinks) would be covered by the ban, affecting their business unduly. [10] [12] While the intent clause in the American law leaves open a loophole for producers of other equally frivolous and environmentally destructive products to potentially exploit in the future—as long as their use case does not involve grooming or personal care—the Canadian law has already been criticized publicly for its overly restrictive nature, which could cripple its efficacy in practice; in response to the revised definition, concerned conservation groups (including the Sierra Club of Canada) have raised warnings about the law's wording, fearing that Canada may "become a dumping ground for [those] microbead-containing products" which are now banned in the United States. [10]

Use

Microbeads are added as an exfoliating agent to cosmetics and personal care products, such as soap, facial scrub, and toothpastes. [13] They may be added to over-the-counter drugs to make them easier to swallow. [14] In biomedical and health science research, microbeads are used in microscopy techniques, fluid visualization, fluid flow analysis, and process troubleshooting. [15] [16]

Sphericity and particle size uniformity create a ball-bearing effect in creams and lotions, resulting in a silky texture and spreadability. Smoothness and roundness can provide lubrication. Colored microspheres add visual appeal to cosmetic products. [17]

Environmental effects

When microbeads are washed down the drain, they may subsequently pass unfiltered through sewage treatment plants and make their way into rivers and canals, resulting in plastic particle water pollution. [18] The beads can absorb and concentrate pollutants like pesticides and polycyclic hydrocarbons. [13] [19] Microbeads have been found to pollute the Great Lakes in high concentrations, particularly Lake Erie. A study from the State University of New York, found anywhere from 1,500 to 1.1 million microbeads per square mile on the surface of the Great Lakes. [20]

One study suggested that environmentally relevant levels of polyethylene microbeads had no impact on larvae. [21] Some wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) in the U.S. and Europe can remove microbeads with an efficiency of greater than 98%, others may not. [22] [23] As such, other sources of microplastic pollution (e.g. microfibers/fibers and car tires) are more likely to be associated with environmental hazards. [24]

A variety of wildlife, from insect larvae, small fish, amphibians and turtles to birds and larger mammals, mistake microbeads for their food source. This ingestion of plastics introduces the potential for toxicity not only to these animals but to other species higher in the food chain. [25] [26] Harmful chemicals thus transferred can include hydrophobic pollutants that collect on the surface of the water such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). [27]

Because the negative impacts of microbeads are a recent discovery, there is still debate about the extent to which they harm various marine life. Despite this uncertainty in the scientific community, there is widespread consensus that microbeads are harmful to marine life. Current methods for cleaning microplastics from the ocean are inefficient, unscalable, and economically infeasible, which serves to intensify the harms they pose. [28] Because their lifespan cannot easily be reduced, the current best method to reduce pollution is to invest in their prohibition.

Banning production and sale in cosmetics

In 2012, the North Sea Foundation and the Plastic Soup Foundation launched an app allowing Dutch consumers to check whether personal care products contain microbeads. [29] In the summer of 2013, the United Nations Environment Programme and UK-based NGO Fauna and Flora International joined the partnership to further develop the app for international audiences. The app has enjoyed success, convincing a number of large multinationals to stop using microbeads, [30] and is available in seven languages. There are many natural and biodegradable alternatives to microbeads that have no environmental impact when washed down the drain, as they will either decompose or get filtered out before being released into the natural environment. Some examples to use as natural exfoliates include ground-up almonds, oatmeal, sea salt, and coconut husks. [31] Burt's Bees and St. Ives use apricot pits and cocoa husks in its products instead of microbeads to reduce their negative environmental impact. [32]

Due to the increase in bans of microbeads in the United States, many cosmetic companies had also been phasing out microbeads from their production lines. [33] L'Oréal had phased out polyethylene microbeads in the exfoliates, cleansers and shower gels from its products by 2017. [34] Johnson and Johnson, who had already started to phase out microbeads at the end of 2015, had stopped producing polyethylene microbeads in their products by 2017. [35] Lastly, Crest had phased out microbeads in its toothpastes in the U.S. by February 2016, and globally by 2017. [36]

The following countries have taken action towards ban on microbeads.

StateSales ban effective dateScope
Flag of Argentina.svg Argentina 29 December 2022Ban on import, manufacture, and sale of microbeads in cosmetics. [37]
Flag of Canada (Pantone).svg Canada 1 January 2018Ban on microbeads smaller than 5 mm in size.
Flag of the People's Republic of China.svg China 31 December 2022Ban on sale, following a ban on production two years earlier (31 December 2020). [38]
Flag of France.svg France 1 January 2018Ban on import, manufacture, and sale of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics. [39]
Flag of Ireland.svg Ireland 20 February 2020Ban on microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics. [40]
Flag of Italy.svg Italy 1 January 2020Ban on microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics. [41] [42]
Flag of New Zealand.svg New Zealand 7 June 2018Ban on import, manufacture, and sale of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics. [43]
Flag of South Korea.svg South Korea 1 July 2017Ban on sale of microbeads in cosmetics. [44]
Flag of Sweden.svg Sweden 1 January 2019Ban on sale of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics, following an earlier ban on import and manufacture (1 July 2018). [45]
Flag of the Republic of China.svg Taiwan 1 July 2018Ban on sale of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics, following an earlier ban on import and manufacture (1 January 2018). [46]
Flag of Thailand.svg Thailand 1 January 2020Ban on import, manufacture, and sale of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics. [47]
Flag of the United Kingdom.svg United Kingdom 1 October 2018Ban on the use of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics and personal care products. England and Scotland (19 June 2018), Wales (30 June 2018), Northern Ireland (1 October 2018).
Flag of the United States.svg United States 1 July 2017Ban on manufacture of microbeads for rinse-off cosmetics at the federal level.

Australia

In 2016, the federal and state governments agreed to support a voluntary industry phase-out of microbeads in rinse-off personal care, cosmetic, and cleaning products. An independent assessment in 2020 found that more than 99% of products it inspected were microbead-free. [48] The New South Wales state government banned the supply of rinse-off personal care products containing microbeads, effective from 1 November 2022. [49]

Canada

On May 18, 2015, Canada took its first steps toward banning microbeads when a Member of Parliament from Toronto, John McKay, introduced Bill C-680, which would ban the sale of microbeads. [50] The first Canadian province to take action against microbeads was Ontario, where Maire-France Lalonde, a Member of the Provincial Parliament, introduced the Microbead Elimination and Monitoring Act. [51] This bill enforced the ban of manufacturing microbeads in cosmetics, facial scrubs or washes, and similar products. The bill also proposed that there would be yearly samples taken from the Canadian Great Lakes, which would be analyzed for traces of microbeads. [51]

Pointe-Claire mayor Morris Trudeau and members of the City Council requested Pointe-Claire residents to sign a petition asking governments of Canada and Quebec to ban "the use of plastic microbeads in cosmetic and cleansing products." Trudeau suggested that if Quebec banned microbeads, manufactures would be encouraged to stop producing them in their products. [52] Megan Leslie, Halifax Member of Parliament, presented a motion against microbeads in the House of Commons, which received "unanimous support" and was hoping for them to be listed under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act as a toxin. [53]

On June 29, 2016, the Federal Government of Canada added microbeads in the Canadian Environmental Protection Act under Schedule 1 as a toxic substance. [33] [54] The import or manufacture of toiletries containing microbeads was banned on January 1, 2018, and sales were banned from July 1, 2018. [55] [56] Microbeads in natural health products and non-prescription drugs were also banned in 2019. [57] [33]

Ireland

In November 2016, Simon Coveney, the Minister for Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government, said that the Fine Gael–led government would press for an EU-wide ban on microbeads and rejected a Green Party bill banning them on the basis that it might conflict with the EU's freedom of movement of goods. [58] [59] In June 2019, Coveney's successor Eoghan Murphy introduced the Microbeads (Prohibition) Bill 2019, which would ban manufacture, sale, and export of rinse-off microbead products. [60] The government also intends to include microbeads when updating the law on preventing marine pollution. [59] [61] Microbeads were banned in February 2020. [40]

Netherlands

The Netherlands was the first country to announce its intent to be free of microbeads in cosmetics by the end of 2016. [62] State Secretary for Infrastructure and the Environment Mansveld has said she is pleased with the progress made by the members of the Nederlandse Cosmetica Vereniging (NCV), the Dutch trade organisation for producers and importers of cosmetics, [63] who have ceased using microbeads or are working towards removing microbeads from their product. Among the NCV's members are large multinationals such as Unilever, L'Oréal, Colgate-Palmolive, Henkel, and Johnson & Johnson.[ citation needed ]

South Africa

A ban on microbeads has been proposed in South Africa after microplastic pollution was found in tap water. [64]

United Kingdom

The British government has banned the production of microbeads in rinse-off cosmetics and cleaning products in England [65] effective 9 January 2018, [66] followed by a sales ban on 19 June 2018. [67] [68] Scotland introduced its own manufacture and sales ban on the same day [69] [68] and Wales introduced its on 30 June 2018. [70] The ban was extended to Northern Ireland from 11 March 2019. [71]

United States

National

At the federal level, the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 prohibits the manufacture and introduction into interstate commerce of rinse-off cosmetics containing intentionally-added plastic microbeads by July 1, 2017. Representative Frank Pallone proposed the bill in 2014 (H.R. 4895, reintroduced in 2015 as H.R. 1321). On December 7, 2015, his proposal was narrowed by amendment to rinse-off cosmetics, and passed unanimously by the House. [72] The American Chemistry Council and other industry groups supported the final bill, [13] [73] [74] which the Senate passed on December 18, 2015, and the president signed on December 28, 2015. [72] Since the act took effect, the use of microbeads in toothpaste and other rinse-off cosmetic products has been discontinued in the U.S.; [75] however, since 2015, many industries have instead shifted toward using FDA-approved "rinse-off" metallized-plastic glitter as their primary abrasive agent. [76] [77] [78]

States

Illinois became the first U.S. state to enact legislation banning the manufacture and sale of products containing microbeads; the two-part ban went into effect in 2018 and 2019. [79] The Personal Care Products Council, a trade group for the cosmetics industry, came out in support of the Illinois bill. [80] Other states have followed.

As of October 2015, all state bans except California's ban, had allowed biodegradable microbeads. [81] [82] Johnson & Johnson and Procter & Gamble opposed the California law. [83]

State/territoryDate enactedEffective dateScope
Flag of California.svg California October 8, 2015 [83] January 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs)Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics that contain more than 1 ppm of microbeads. Does not allow biodegradable microbeads. [82] [84]
Flag of Colorado.svg Colorado March 26, 2015Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs) [85] Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads.
Flag of Connecticut.svg Connecticut June 30, 2015Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs) [86] Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads.
Flag of Illinois.svg Illinois June 8, 2014 [87] Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs) [88] Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads. Excludes prescription drugs.
Flag of Indiana.svg Indiana April 15, 2015Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs)Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads. [89]
Flag of Maine.svg Maine March 2015Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs)Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads.
Flag of Maryland.svg Maryland May 12, 2015Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs) [90] Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads.
Flag of New Jersey.svg New Jersey March 2015 [91] [92] Jan. 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs) [93] Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads. [94]
Flag of Wisconsin.svg Wisconsin July 1, 2015 [95] January 1, 2018 (manufacture of personal care products) – Jan. 1, 2020 (sale of over-the-counter drugs)Restricted to rinse-off cosmetics. Allows biodegradable microbeads. Excludes prescription drugs.

In 2014, legislation was voted on but failed to pass in New York. [96]

Local

In 2015, Erie County, New York, passed the first local ban in the state of New York. It banned the sale and distribution of all plastic microbeads (including biodegradable ones) including from personal care products. [97] As of September 2015, its prohibition on sales was stronger than any other law in the country. [98] It was enacted on August 12, 2015, [99] and took effect in February 2016. [100]

In November 2015, four other NY counties followed suit. [101]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Glitter</span> Shiny and small reflective particles

Glitter is an assortment of flat, small, reflective particles that are precision cut and come in a variety of shapes, sizes, and colors. Glitter particles reflect light at different angles, causing the surface to sparkle or shimmer. Glitter is similar to confetti, sparkles and sequins, but somewhat smaller.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic bag</span> Type of container made of thin, flexible, plastic film, nonwoven fabric, or plastic textile

A plastic bag, poly bag, or pouch is a type of container made of thin, flexible, plastic film, nonwoven fabric, or plastic textile. Plastic bags are used for containing and transporting goods such as foods, produce, powders, ice, magazines, chemicals, and waste. It is a common form of packaging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine debris</span> Human-created solid waste in the sea or ocean

Marine debris, also known as marine litter, is human-created solid material that has deliberately or accidentally been released in a sea or ocean. Floating oceanic debris tends to accumulate at the center of gyres and on coastlines, frequently washing aground, when it is known as beach litter or tidewrack. Deliberate disposal of wastes at sea is called ocean dumping. Naturally occurring debris, such as driftwood and drift seeds, are also present. With the increasing use of plastic, human influence has become an issue as many types of (petrochemical) plastics do not biodegrade quickly, as would natural or organic materials. The largest single type of plastic pollution (~10%) and majority of large plastic in the oceans is discarded and lost nets from the fishing industry. Waterborne plastic poses a serious threat to fish, seabirds, marine reptiles, and marine mammals, as well as to boats and coasts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exfoliation (cosmetology)</span> Removal of dead skin cells from the epidermis

In cosmetology, exfoliation is the removal of the surface skin cells and built-up dirt from the skin's surface. The term comes from the Latin word exfoliare. This is a regular practice within the cosmetic industry, both for its outcome of promoting skin regeneration as well as providing a deep cleanse of the skin barrier. Being used in facials, this process can be achieved by mechanical or chemical means, such as microdermabrasion or chemical peels. Exfoliants are advertised as treatments that enhance beauty and promote a youthful and healthy appearance.

Microparticles are particles between 0.1 and 100 μm in size. Commercially available microparticles are available in a wide variety of materials, including ceramics, glass, polymers, and metals. Microparticles encountered in daily life include pollen, sand, dust, flour, and powdered sugar.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic bottle</span> Narrow-necked container

A plastic bottle is a bottle constructed from high-density or low density plastic. Plastic bottles are typically used to store liquids such as water, soft drinks, motor oil, cooking oil, medicine, shampoo, milk, and ink. The size ranges from very small bottles to large carboys. Consumer blow molded containers often have integral handles or are shaped to facilitate grasping.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic pellet pollution</span> Marine debris from plastic manufacturing particles

Plastic pellet pollution is a type of marine debris originating from the plastic particles that are universally used to manufacture large-scale plastics. In the context of plastic pollution, these pre-production plastic pellets are commonly known as 'nurdles'. These microplastics are created separately from the user plastics they are melted down to form, and pellet loss can occur during both the manufacturing and transport stages. When released into the open environment, they create persistent pollution both in the oceans and on beaches. About 230,000 tonnes of nurdles are thought to be deposited in the oceans each year, where they are often mistaken for food by seabirds, fish and other wildlife. Due to their small size, they are notoriously difficult to clear up from beaches and elsewhere.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Garbage patch</span> Gyre of marine debris

A garbage patch is a gyre of marine debris particles caused by the effects of ocean currents and increasing plastic pollution by human populations. These human-caused collections of plastic and other debris are responsible for ecosystem and environmental problems that affect marine life, contaminate oceans with toxic chemicals, and contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Once waterborne, marine debris becomes mobile. Flotsam can be blown by the wind, or follow the flow of ocean currents, often ending up in the middle of oceanic gyres where currents are weakest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine plastic pollution</span> Environmental pollution by plastics

Marine plastic pollution is a type of marine pollution by plastics, ranging in size from large original material such as bottles and bags, down to microplastics formed from the fragmentation of plastic material. Marine debris is mainly discarded human rubbish which floats on, or is suspended in the ocean. Eighty percent of marine debris is plastic. Microplastics and nanoplastics result from the breakdown or photodegradation of plastic waste in surface waters, rivers or oceans. Recently, scientists have uncovered nanoplastics in heavy snow, more specifically about 3,000 tons that cover Switzerland yearly.

Clean Water Action is an American environmental advocacy group. Created in 1972, the group focuses on canvassing and gaining support for political issues and candidates. It is a 501(c)(4) organization and is based in Washington, D.C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic</span> Material of a wide range of synthetic or semi-synthetic organic solids

Plastics are a wide range of synthetic or semi-synthetic materials that use polymers as a main ingredient. Their plasticity makes it possible for plastics to be moulded, extruded or pressed into solid objects of various shapes. This adaptability, plus a wide range of other properties, such as being lightweight, durable, flexible, and inexpensive to produce, has led to its widespread use. Plastics typically are made through human industrial systems. Most modern plastics are derived from fossil fuel-based chemicals like natural gas or petroleum; however, recent industrial methods use variants made from renewable materials, such as corn or cotton derivatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Atlantic garbage patch</span> Large floating field of debris in the North Atlantic Ocean

The North Atlantic garbage patch is a garbage patch of man-made marine debris found floating within the North Atlantic Gyre, originally documented in 1972. A 22-year research study conducted by the Sea Education Association estimates the patch to be hundreds of kilometers across, with a density of more than 200,000 pieces of debris per square kilometer. The garbage originates from human-created waste traveling from rivers into the ocean and mainly consists of microplastics. The garbage patch is a large risk to wildlife through plastic consumption and entanglement. There have only been a few awareness and clean-up efforts for the North Atlantic garbage patch, such as The Garbage Patch State at UNESCO and The Ocean Cleanup, as most of the research and cleanup efforts have been focused on the Great Pacific garbage patch, a similar garbage patch in the north Pacific.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microplastics</span> Extremely small fragments of plastic

Microplastics are fragments of any type of plastic less than 5 mm (0.20 in) in length, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and the European Chemicals Agency. They cause pollution by entering natural ecosystems from a variety of sources, including cosmetics, clothing, food packaging, and industrial processes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic pollution</span> Accumulation of plastic in natural ecosystems

Plastic pollution is the accumulation of plastic objects and particles in the Earth's environment that adversely affects humans, wildlife and their habitat. Plastics that act as pollutants are categorized by size into micro-, meso-, or macro debris. Plastics are inexpensive and durable, making them very adaptable for different uses; as a result, manufacturers choose to use plastic over other materials. However, the chemical structure of most plastics renders them resistant to many natural processes of degradation and as a result they are slow to degrade. Together, these two factors allow large volumes of plastic to enter the environment as mismanaged waste which persists in the ecosystem and travels throughout food webs.

The 5 Gyres Institute is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that focuses on reducing plastics pollution by focusing on primary research. Programs concentrate on science, education and adventure. Since 2017, 5 Gyres has been in special consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council. The organization's 2015 Expedition was featured in the 2017 documentary "Smog of the Sea," produced by Jack Johnson, who participated in the voyage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015</span>

The Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 is a United States law that prohibits the addition of plastic microbeads in the manufacturing of certain personal care products, such as toothpaste. The purpose of the law is to reduce water pollution caused by these products. Manufacture of the microbead-containing products was prohibited in July 2017, and retail sales are prohibited as of July 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic Soup Foundation</span> Non-governmental organization

Plastic Soup Foundation is a non-profit marine conservation organisation that aims to reduce plastic pollution. Established in 2011, Plastic Soup Foundation advocates towards imposing bans and/or voluntary phase-outs of microbeads in cosmetics at a global scale with the Beat the Microbead campaign.

The Shaw Institute, formerly the Marine & Environmental Research Institute, is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit scientific research organization based in Blue Hill, Maine and New York City. The institute conducts research into ocean pollution, flame retardants, microplastics and plastic pollution, sentinel species and climate change.

Tamara Susan Galloway is a British marine scientist and Professor of Ecotoxicology at the University of Exeter. She was appointed an Officer of the Order of the British Empire in the 2019 Birthday Honours.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chelsea Rochman</span> American marine and freshwater ecologist

Chelsea Marina Rochman is an American marine and freshwater ecologist whose research focuses on anthropogenic stressors in freshwater and marine ecosystems. Since September 2016, Rochman has been an assistant professor at the University of Toronto in the department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and a scientific advisor to the Ocean Conservancy.

References

  1. Arthur et al. (eds.). 2009. Proceedings of the International Research Workshop on the Occurrence, Effects, and Fate of Microplastic Marine Debris. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum. NOS-OR&R-30
  2. "Microbeads, Meal kits, You and Yours - BBC Radio 4". BBC.
  3. "H.R.1321 - Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015". Congress.gov. Congress.gov. 28 December 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  4. Imam, Jareen (19 September 2015). "8 trillion microbeads pollute U.S. aquatic habitats daily". CNN. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  5. "Microbeads – A Science Summary July 2015" (PDF).
  6. "Microbeads". 5 Gyres. Retrieved 2 October 2015.
  7. "Microbeads – A Science Summary". Environment Canada. July 2015. Retrieved 2 October 2015.
  8. Graham, Karen (2017-09-07). "Removing microplastics from tap water starts at treatment plants". www.digitaljournal.com. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  9. Liu, P.S.; Chen, G.F. (2014). "Producing Polymer Foams". Porous Materials. pp. 345–382. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407788-1.00007-1. ISBN   978-0-12-407788-1.
  10. 1 2 3 "Microbeads: "Tip of the Toxic Plastic-berg"? Regulation, Alternatives, and Future Implications" (PDF).
  11. "Text – H.R.1321 – 114th Congress (2015–2016): Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015". 28 December 2015.
  12. "Microbeads – A Science Summary July 2015" (PDF).
  13. 1 2 3 Danny Lewis (10 December 2015). "Five Things to Know About Congress' Vote to Ban Microbeads". Smithsonian magazine. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  14. Snead, Florence (2018-06-19). "The products with microbeads you will no longer be able to buy from today". inews.co.uk. Retrieved 2019-06-13.
  15. "Opaque Polyethylene Microspheres for Coatings Applications".
  16. Kieler, Ashlee (2015-12-29). "Say Goodbye To Microbeads: President Signs Act To Ban Microscopic Plastic Particles". Consumerist. Retrieved 2016-06-13.
  17. Solid Polyethylene Microspheres for effects in color cosmetics Archived 2012-03-04 at the Wayback Machine Cosmetics and Toiletries.com, April 2010
  18. Fendall, L.S.; Sewell, M.A. (2009). "Contributing to marine pollution by washing your face: microplastics in facial cleansers". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 58 (8): 1225–1228. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2009.04.025. PMID   19481226.
  19. Johnston, Christopher (June 25, 2013). "Personal Grooming Products May Be Harming Great Lakes Marine Life" . Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  20. "Plastic microbeads pile up into problems for the Great Lakes". PBS NewsHour. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 2016-06-15.
  21. Kaposi, Katrina L.; Mos, Benjamin; Kelaher, Brendan P.; Dworjanyn, Symon A. (4 February 2014). "Ingestion of Microplastic Has Limited Impact on a Marine Larva". Environmental Science & Technology. 48 (3): 1638–1645. Bibcode:2014EnST...48.1638K. doi:10.1021/es404295e. PMID   24341789.
  22. Murphy, Fionn; Ewins, Ciaran; Carbonnier, Frederic; Quinn, Brian (7 June 2016). "Wastewater Treatment Works (WwTW) as a Source of Microplastics in the Aquatic Environment" (PDF). Environmental Science & Technology. 50 (11): 5800–5808. Bibcode:2016EnST...50.5800M. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b05416. PMID   27191224.
  23. Carr, Steve A.; Liu, Jin; Tesoro, Arnold G. (March 2016). "Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants". Water Research. 91: 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.002. PMID   26795302.
  24. Lea, Robert (2021-01-13). "The True Extent of Microplastic Pollution Caused by Clothing Revealed". AZoCleantech.com. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  25. Gunawardana, Maleesha. "The Macro Problems of Microbeads In Sri Lankan Seas". roar.media. Retrieved 2020-12-20.
  26. Hettiarachchi, Dineshani (13 June 2020). "Microplastics – The silent killer". www.themorning.lk. Retrieved 2021-01-29.
  27. Nalbone, Jennifer; Schneiderman, Eric T; Srolovic, Lemuel M (2014). Unseen threat: how microbeads harm New York waters, wildlife, health and environment (PDF). Office of the Attorney General. OCLC   927110175.
  28. Pan, Yusheng; Gao, Shu-Hong; Ge, Chang; Qun, Gao; Huang, Sijing; Kang, Yuanyuan; Luo, Gaoyang; Zhang, Ziqi; Fan, Lu; Zhu, Yongming; Wang, Ai-Jie (13 Jan 2023). "Removing microplastics from aquatic environments: A critical review". Environmental Science and Ecotechnology. doi:10.1016/j.ese.2022.100222. PMC   9722483 . PMID   36483746 . Retrieved 24 Jan 2024.
  29. "In short - Beat the Microbead". Beat the Microbead. Archived from the original on October 22, 2014. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
  30. "Results - Beat the Microbead". Beat the Microbead. Archived from the original on October 22, 2014. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
  31. "Micro plastics in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Region" (PDF). June 4, 2015.
  32. "Facial scrubs polluting Great Lakes with plastic". July 31, 2013. Retrieved February 1, 2016 via CBC News.
  33. 1 2 3 Xanthos, Dirk; Walker, Tony Himani R. (May 2017). "International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review". Marine Pollution Bulletin. 118 (1–2): 17–26. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.02.048. PMID   28238328.
  34. "L'oread commits to phase out all polyethylene microbeads from its scrubs by 2017". L'Oreal. January 29, 2014. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  35. "Microbeads". Our Safety & Care Commitment. Johnson and Johnson. December 10, 2016. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  36. "Frequently Asked Questions About Microbeads". Crest. August 23, 2014. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  37. Havens, Raissa. "Argentina Prohibits Plastic Microbeads in Cosmetic Products". UL Materials & Supply Chain. Retrieved 2021-04-26.
  38. "China to ban production of cosmetics containing microbeads by 2020 end". 5 December 2019.
  39. "France to ban microplastics in some cosmetics products" . Retrieved 16 March 2018.
  40. 1 2 "Green News Ireland is under construction".
  41. "Italy to ban microplastics used in rinse-off cosmetics products" . Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  42. "Ban on microbeads in UK, Italy and New Zealand - Beat the Microbead". www.beatthemicrobead.org. 22 December 2017. Retrieved 16 March 2018.
  43. "Plastic microbeads ban - Ministry for the Environment". www.mfe.govt.nz. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  44. "Korea Bans Plastic Microbeads in Cosmetics". cosmetic. 2017-07-04. Retrieved 2019-06-28.
  45. "Sweden adopts microbeads ban in rinse-off cosmetics" . Retrieved 16 March 2018.
  46. "Taipei brings forward microbeads ban". AsiaHub. Retrieved 29 April 2018.
  47. "Thailand's plastic ban prompts producers to be eco-friendly".
  48. "Plastic microbeads". Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water. 11 October 2021. Retrieved 30 May 2023.
  49. "Microbeads". NSW Environment Protection Authority. 1 June 2022. Retrieved 30 May 2023.
  50. "Bill C-680". House of Commons of Canada. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  51. 1 2 Lalonde, Maire-France. "Bill 75, Microbead Elimination and Monitoring Act, 2015". Legislative Assembly of Ontario. Archived from the original on January 5, 2016. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  52. "Pointe-Claire asks for a ban on plastic microbeads". City of Pointe-Claire. September 11, 2015. Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  53. Windsor, Hillary (April 16, 2015). "Megan Leslie wants a ban on microbeads" . Retrieved February 1, 2016.
  54. "Statement by Environmental Defence's Maggie MacDonald on federal government's decision on microbeads - Environmental Defence". 29 June 2016. Archived from the original on 29 September 2017. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
  55. "Canada Has Officially Banned Toiletries That Contain Plastic Microbeads" . Retrieved 10 January 2018.
  56. "Canadian government moves to ban plastic microbeads in toiletries by July 2018". 4 November 2016. Retrieved 10 January 2018 via Toronto Star.
  57. Pettipas, Shauna; Bernier, Meagan; Walker, Tony R. (June 2016). "A Canadian policy framework to mitigate plastic marine pollution". Marine Policy. 68: 117–122. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.02.025.
  58. "Written answers: Environmental Policy". KildareStreet.com. 16 November 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2019.; "Seanad debates: Micro-plastic and Micro-bead Pollution Prevention Bill 2016: Second Stage". KildareStreet.com. 23 November 2016. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  59. 1 2 Kiernan, Eddie (2016-11-23). "Minister Coveney addresses the Green Party's Private Members Bill on Microbeads". Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government (Press release). Retrieved 20 December 2016.
  60. "Ireland to be first EU country to ban plastic microbeads in cleaners, Dáil told". Irish Times. 20 June 2019.; "Microbeads (Prohibition) Bill 2019 – No. 41 of 2019". Bills. Oireachtas. 14 June 2019. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  61. "Written answers: Maritime Spatial Planning". KildareStreet.com. 20 June 2018. Retrieved 13 November 2019.
  62. "Beat the Microbead: Nederland spreekt zich uit" (in Dutch). Plastic Soup Foundation. October 29, 2014. Archived from the original on November 29, 2014. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
  63. "Appreciatie RIVM rapport en stand van zaken microplastics en geneesmiddelen". Rijksoverheid. October 28, 2014.
  64. "Government considering ban on microbeads after Gauteng drinking water is found to be contaminated" . Retrieved 20 August 2018.
  65. "The Environmental Protection (Microbeads) (England) Regulations 2017". www.legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 16 March 2018.
  66. "Plastic microbeads ban enters force in UK". The Guardian. 9 January 2018. Retrieved 9 January 2018.
  67. "Face scrubs and toothpastes hit as ban on microbeads begins" . Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  68. 1 2 "World leading microbeads ban comes into force" . Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  69. "Scotland announces microbeads ban" . Retrieved 16 March 2018.
  70. "Wales to ban microbeads from June" . Retrieved 19 June 2018.
  71. "The Environmental Protection (Microbeads) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2019". legislation.co.uk. UK Government. 11 July 2018. Retrieved 2 November 2019.
  72. 1 2 "Statement by the Press Secretary on H.R. 1321, S. 2425". whitehouse.gov . 2015. Retrieved 2015-12-29 via National Archives.
  73. Kari, Embree (2015-12-08). "U.S. House passes legislation to ban plastic microbeads". Plastics Today. Retrieved 2015-12-10.
  74. "H.R.1321 - To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to prohibit the manufacture and introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of rinse-off cosmetics containing intentionally-added plastic microbeads". Congress.gov. Congress.gov. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  75. "What Are Microbeads In Toothpaste?". Colgate . Retrieved November 28, 2022.
  76. Caity Weaver (December 21, 2018). "What Is Glitter? A strange journey to the glitter factory". The New York Times . Retrieved November 28, 2022.
  77. Trisha Bartle (October 17, 2022). "TikTok Is Going Deep On The Glitter Conspiracy Theories–Is It Toothpaste, Boats, Or Something Else?". Collective World. Retrieved November 28, 2022.
  78. Beccy Corkill (December 21, 2022). "The Glitter Conspiracy Theory: Who Is Taking All Of The Glitter?". IFLScience . Retrieved January 18, 2023.
  79. "Governor Quinn Signs Bill to Ban Microbeads, Protect Illinois Waterways". Illinois Government News Network. June 8, 2014.
  80. Johnson, Jim (May 9, 2014). "Momentum building for plastic microbead bans". Plastics News. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  81. Paul Rogers (9 October 2015) Plastic microbeads and state coal investments banned as Gov. Jerry Brown signs new laws East Bay Times.
  82. 1 2 Phil Willon California lawmakers approve ban on plastic microbeads LA Times, 8 September 2015
  83. 1 2 Mason, Melanie (October 8, 2015). "Products with plastic microbeads to be banned under new California law". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 10 October 2015.
  84. California Lawmakers Approve Ban On Plastic Microbeads In Cosmetics Lydia O'Connor, The Huffington Post,8 September 2015
  85. "HOUSE BILL 15-1144" (PDF). State of Colorado. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  86. "Bill No. 1502". State of Connecticut. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  87. "Governor Quinn Signs Bill to Ban Microbeads, Protect Illinois Waterways". State of Illinois. June 8, 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  88. "Microbead-free waters". Illinois General Assembly. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  89. "HOUSE ENROLLED ACT No. 1185". State of Indiana. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  90. "House Bill 216" (PDF). State of Maryland. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  91. Johnson, Brent (24 October 2014). "Bill to ban microbeads in N.J. heads to Christie's desk". NJ Advance media for NJ.com. Retrieved 24 October 2014.
  92. Sergio Bichao (March 23, 2015). "Products with microbeads will disappear from N.J. stores thanks to new ban". Mycentarlnewjersey.com. Gannett. Retrieved 1 June 2015.
  93. "ASSEMBLY, No. 3083". State of New Jersey. 2014. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  94. "CHAPTER 28". New Jersey Legislature. New Jersey Office of Legislative Services. Archived from the original on 22 December 2015. Retrieved 10 December 2015.
  95. O'Brien, Brendan (July 1, 2015). "Wisconsin Governor Walker signs bill banning microbeads". Reuters. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  96. Abrams, Rachel (May 22, 2015). "Fighting Pollution From Microbeads Used in Soaps and Creams". New York Times. Retrieved 8 August 2015.
  97. "Local Law #3, 2015" (PDF). Erie County. 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2015.
  98. Warner, Gene (11 August 2015). "Consumers, companies prepare for Erie County microbead ban". The Buffalo News. Retrieved 24 September 2015.
  99. "Law signed to ban microbeads in Erie County". WGRZ.com. August 12, 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2015.[ permanent dead link ]
  100. "Erie County Appears To Be Not Fully Enforcing Microbead Ban". spectrumlocalnews.com. Retrieved 2018-12-05.
  101. "Microbeads to no longer be sold in Albany Co". News 10. November 9, 2015. Retrieved 24 November 2015.