Minuscule 2427

Last updated
Minuscule 2427
New Testament manuscript
Archaic mark session.jpg
Text Gospel of Mark
Datealleged 13th, 19th
Script Greek
Now at University of Chicago Library
Size11.5 x 8.5 cm
Type Alexandrian text-type
Category I

Codex 2427 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering), formerly known as Archaic Mark, is a miniature manuscript of the Gospel of Mark written in minuscule Greek. The manuscript had been very difficult to date paleographically and had been assigned to the 13th-18th century, until 2006 when it was proved a forgery following the publication of digital images of the codex, which had been made available online to renew interest in the manuscript.

Contents

The codex is written in a tiny minuscule hand on parchment leaves, containing 44 leaves (11.5 cm by 8.5 cm), written in one column per page, 21-25 lines per page. The codex has no sections, canons or headings, but it contains 16 colour illuminations. [1] There are no indications on the codex that it was originally part of a tetraevangelium. The codex includes text of Mark 16:9-20. [2]

The codex 2427 was found among the possessions of John Askitopoulos, an Athenian collector and dealer of antiquities, after his death in 1917. In 1937 the manuscript was sent to the University of Chicago Library, where it still resides (Ms. 972). [3]

Illustrations are very similar to those from minuscule 777. Robert S. Nelson suggested that they were copied from 777. [4]

Archaic Mark

The text has some omissions (Mark 7:2-5, 8:11b, 13:28b-29, 10:29 is shorter). All these omissions have parallels in other Gospels, and for some scholars they look like non-interpolations, although they are not supported by any other manuscript.

Words before the bracket are the reading of NA27, words after the bracket are the reading of the codex

Mark 1:3 Ησαια ] Ισαια
Mark 1:14 Γαλιλαιαν ] Γαλλιλαιαν
Mark 1:44 Μωυσης ] Μωησης
Mark 2:7 ει μη ] ει μι
Mark 2:22 οινον ωεον ] οινον παλαιον
Mark 2:25 Δαυιδ ] Δαυειδ
Mark 2:26 ιερεις ] αρχιερεις
Mark 3:17 Βοανεργες ] Βουανηργες
Mark 3:18 και Βαρθολομαιον ] [omitted]
Mark 3:32 και οι αδελφοι σου και αι αδελφοι σου εξω ζητουσιν σε ] [omitted]
Mark 5:1 εις το περαν της θαλασσης ] [omitted]
Mark 6:2 και γενομενου σαββατου ηρξατο διδασκειν εν τη συναγωγη ] [omitted]
Mark 7:2-5 τους αρτους – οι γαρ Φαρισαιοι… – και επερωτωσιν ] τους αρτους και επερωτωσιν
Mark 7:22 ασελγεια ] ασελγια
Mark 8:11 συζητειν αυτω, ζητουντες παρ’ αυτου σημειον απο του ουρανου, πειραζοντες ] συζητειν αυτω πειραζοντες
Mark 8:12 αμην λεγω υμιν, ει δοθησεται τη γενεα ταυτη σημειον ] [omitted]
Mark 9:33 ηλθον ] ηλθαν
Mark 9:43 εις την ζωην ] εν τη ζωη
Μark 10:22 ην γαρ εχων κτηματα πολλα ] ην γαρ πλουσιος
Mark 10:29 ος αφηκεν οικιαν… … και αγρους μετα διωγμων ] ος αφηκεν οικιαν η αδελφους η αδελφας η μητερα η πατηρα η αγρους μετα διωγμων
Mark 11:28 η τις σοι ] και τις σοι
Mark 13:28b-29 οτι εγγυς το θερος, εστιν ουτως και υμεις οταν ιδητε ταυτα γινομενα γινωσκετε οτι εγγυς εστιν επι θυραις ] οτι το θερος εγγυς εστιν επι θυραις
Mark 14:72 και αναμνησθη ο Πετρος το ρημα ] – [omitted] [5]

The Greek text of the codex was a leading representative of the Alexandrian text-type. It was recognized by Ernest Cadman Colwell (1901-1974) as having an extraordinary degree of correspondence with the Codex Vaticanus. According to Colwell the codex preserved a "primitive text" of the Gospel of Mark. [6] Text of the codex was highly esteemed by T. C. Skeat. Kurt Aland placed it in Category I. [3] It was collated by M. M. Mitchell and P. A. Duncan in 2006. [7]

Forgery

Portrait of Mark Evangelist and beginning of the Gospel Minuscule 2427 (GA) beginning of Mark.jpg
Portrait of Mark Evangelist and beginning of the Gospel

The manuscript found some early critics upon arriving in Chicago. Robert P. Casey "voiced his suspicion in 1947". [8] In 1988 Mary V. Orna found that one of the illustrations contained Prussian blue (KFe[Fe(CN)6]), produced since 1704 only. [9] This did not resolve the question of authenticity, however, as it was "conceivable that the illuminations could have been retouched in a naïve attempt at restoration." [10]

In early 2006 the University of Chicago announced that digital images of the manuscript had appeared online in an effort to "foster further research." [11] By February Stephen Carlson had announced his findings that the codex was a forgery, and proved his case beyond a doubt at the 2006 Annual Meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature. [10] Its text has been copied from Philipp Buttmann's 1860 Greek New Testament edition (based on Cardinal Mai's edition of Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209). [12] This is especially obvious since the forger also followed Buttmann in 81 out of 85 places where his edition departed from the Codex Vaticanus text. Furthermore, in three places the copyist of 2427 had accidentally omitted a line (6:2, 8:12, 14:14), and it transpired that in each verse the omitted text corresponds exactly to the lineation of Buttmann's edition. [13]

Furthermore, microscopic, chemical and codicological testing eventually proved in 2009 that the manuscript had been made in 1874 at the earliest. [14]

What made the text a forgery was that it was carefully manufactured in the style of a medieval codex, when it was in fact a very recent creation, no older than the late 19th century. What originally made scholars so suspicious was that it was textually the closest known manuscript – in fact, virtually identical – to Codex Vaticanus, but of a much later date. Furthermore, Greek codices of a single gospel are extremely unusual, further contributing to the suspicion that it was made as a souvenir.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Vaticanus</span> 4th-century Bible manuscript in Greek

The Codex Vaticanus, designated by siglum B or 03, δ 1, is a Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament and the majority of the Greek New Testament. It is one of the four great uncial codices. Along with Codex Alexandrinus and Codex Sinaiticus, it is one of the earliest and most complete manuscripts of the Bible. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 4th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Koridethi</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Koridethi, also named Codex Coridethianus, designated by siglum Θ or 038, ε050, is a Greek uncial manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been assigned to the 9th century CE. The manuscript has several gaps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Washingtonianus</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Washingtonianus, Codex Washingtonensis, Codex Freerianus, also called the Washington Manuscript of the Gospels, The Freer Gospel and The Freer Codex, is a Greek uncial manuscript of the four Gospels, written on parchment. It is designated by W or 032 in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts, and ε014 in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 4th or 5th century. The manuscript has some gaps. The manuscript was among a collection of manuscripts bought by American industrialist Charles Lang Freer at the start of the 20th century, and first published by biblical scholar Henry A. Sanders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uncial 030</span> New Testament manuscript

Uncial 030, designated by siglum U or 030, ε 90, is a Greek uncial manuscript of the New Testament on parchment, dated palaeographically to the 9th century. The manuscript has complex contents, with full marginalia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Cyprius</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Cyprius, designated by Ke or 017, ε71, or Codex Colbertinus 5149, is a Greek uncial manuscript of the four Gospels, written on parchment. It is one of the few uncial manuscripts with the complete text of the four Gospels, and it is one of the more important late uncial manuscripts. It was brought from Cyprus to Paris.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Sangallensis 48</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Sangallensis is a Greek-Latin diglot uncial manuscript of the four Gospels. It is designated by Δ or 037 in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts, and ε76 in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it is usually dated to the 9th century CE, though a few palaeographers would place it in the 10th century CE. It was given its current name by biblical scholar Johann Martin Augustin Scholz in 1830.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Tischendorfianus III</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Tischendorfianus III – designated by siglum Λ or 039, ε 77 – is a Greek uncial manuscript of the Gospels on parchment. Palaeographically it has been assigned to the 9th or 10th century.

Codex Vaticanus Graecus 2061, usually known as Uncial 048, α1 (Soden), is a Greek uncial manuscript on parchment. It contains some parts of the New Testament, homilies of several authors, and Strabo's Geographica. Formerly it was known also as the Codex Basilianus 100, earlier as Codex Patriniensis 27. It was designated by ב a, p.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2</span> Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament

Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 2 is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the entire New Testament, apart from the Book of Revelation. Using the study of comparative writings styles (palaeography), it is usually dated to the 12th century CE. It is known as Minuscule 1, δ 254, and formerly designated by 1eap to distinguish it from minuscule 1rK.

Codex Basilensis A. N. IV. 4, known as Minuscule 2815, α 253 (Soden), formerly labelled as 2ap in all catalogues, but subsequently renumbered by Aland, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, dated paleographically to the 12th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Codex Montfortianus</span> New Testament manuscript

Codex Montfortianus designated by 61, δ 603, and known as Minuscule 61 is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament on paper. Erasmus named it Codex Britannicus. Its completion is dated on the basis of its textual affinities to no earlier than the second decade of the 16th century, though a 15th-century date is possible on palaeographic grounds. The manuscript is famous for including a unique version of the Comma Johanneum. It has marginalia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 700</span> New Testament manuscript

Minuscule 700, ε 133, is a Greek New Testament minuscule manuscript of the Gospels, written on parchment. It was formerly labelled as 604 in all New Testament manuscript lists, however textual critic Caspar René Gregory gave it the number 700. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it has been dated to the 11th century. It is currently housed at the British Library in London.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 1739</span> New Testament manuscript

Minuscule 1739, α 78, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament made of parchment. Using the study of comparative writing styles (palaeography), it is dated to the 10th century.

Codex Ephesinus, minuscule 71, ε 253, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, on parchment, illuminated, and elegantly written. It is dated by the colophon to 1160. In the 15th century the manuscript was prepared for liturgical use. The scribal errors are not numerous, but it has many textual divergences from the common text. The Greek text of the codex is a representative of the Byzantine text-type, but the textual character of the codex is disputed by scholars since the 19th century.

Minuscule 225, ε 1210, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. A colophon dates it to the year 1192. It was adapted for liturgical use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 330</span> 12th century Greek manuscript of the New Testament

Minuscule 330, δ 259 (Soden), is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, on parchment. Palaeographically it has been assigned to the 12th century. It has marginalia. The Greek text of the codex is a representative of the Byzantine text-type.

Minuscule 365, δ 367 (Soden), is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament with some parts of the Old Testament, on parchment. Paleographically it has been assigned to the 12th century. It has marginalia.

Minuscule 460, α 397, is a Greek-Latin-Arabic minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, on parchment. The manuscript is lacunose. Palaeographically it has been assigned to the 13th century. Formerly it was labelled by 96a and 109p.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minuscule 543</span> Greek manuscript of the New Testament

Minuscule 543, ε 257 and labelled 556 by biblical scholar and textual critic F. H. A. Scrivener, is a Greek minuscule manuscript of the New Testament, written on parchment. Using the study of comparative handwriting styles (palaeography) it has been assigned to the 12th century.

Ernest Cadman Colwell was an American biblical scholar, textual critic and palaeographer.

References

  1. ↑ M. M. Mitchell, P. A. Duncan, Chicago’s “Archaic Mark” (MS 2427): A Reintroduction to its Enigmas and a Fresh Collation of its Readings, Novum Testamentum, XLVIII, 1 (2006), p. 4.
  2. ↑ M. M. Mitchell, P. A. Duncan, Chicago’s “Archaic Mark” (MS 2427): A Reintroduction to its Enigmas and a Fresh Collation of its Readings, Novum Testamentum, XLVIII, 1 (2006), p. 5.
  3. 1 2 Aland, Kurt; Aland, Barbara (1995). The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism . Erroll F. Rhodes (trans.). Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p.  137. ISBN   978-0-8028-4098-1.
  4. ↑ M. M. Mitchell, P. A. Duncan, Chicago’s “Archaic Mark” (MS 2427): A Reintroduction to its Enigmas and a Fresh Collation of its Readings, Novum Testamentum, XLVIII, 1 (2006), p. 13.
  5. ↑ M. M. Mitchell, P. A. Duncan, Chicago’s “Archaic Mark” (MS 2427): A Reintroduction to its Enigmas and a Fresh Collation of its Readings, Novum Testamentum, XLVIII, 1 (2006), ss. 19-35.
  6. ↑ E.C. Colwell, An Ancient Text of the Gospel of Mark, The Emory University, Quarterly 1 (1945), pp. 65-75; E.C. Colwell, Some Unusual Abbreviations in ms. 2427, Studia evangelica, ed. K. Aland, F.L. Cross, T & U 73, Berlin 1959, pp. 778-779.
  7. ↑ M. M. Mitchell, P. A. Duncan, Chicago’s “Archaic Mark” (MS 2427): A Reintroduction to its Enigmas and a Fresh Collation of its Readings, Novum Testamentum, XLVIII, 1 (2006), pp. 1-35.
  8. ↑ Stephen C. Carlson, "Archaic Mark" (MS 2427) and the Finding of a Manuscript Fake (2006).
  9. ↑ Mary V. Orna, Applications of Infrared Microspectroscopy to Art Historical Questions about Medieval Manuscripts, Archaeological Chemistry, 4 (1988), pp. 270-288.
  10. 1 2 Carlson 2006a
  11. ↑ Mitchell and Duncan 2006
  12. ↑ Novum Testamentum Graece, ed. Ph. Buttman, 5th edition, (Leipzig 1878)
  13. ↑ Stephen C. Carlson, The Nineteenth-Century Exemplar of “Archaic Mark” (MS 2427), SBL 2006.
  14. ↑ “Chicago’s ‘Archaic Mark’ (ms 2427) II: Microscopic, Chemical and Codicological Analysis Confirms Modern Production” (with Joseph G. Barabe and Abigail B. Quandt). Novum Testamentum 52 (2010) 101-33.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.