Herod Antipas

Last updated
Herod Antipas
Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea
Herod Antipas.jpg
Reign4 BC – 39 AD
Predecessor Herod the Great
Successor Agrippa I
BornBefore 20 BC
DiedAfter AD 39
Dynasty Herodian Dynasty
Father Herod the Great
Mother Malthace

Herod Antipas (Greek : Ἡρῴδης Ἀντίπας, Hērǭdēs Antipas; born before 20 BC died after 39 AD), was a 1st-century ruler of Galilee and Perea, who bore the title of tetrarch ("ruler of a quarter") and is referred to as both "Herod the Tetrarch" [1] and "King Herod" [2] in the New Testament, although he never held the title of king. [3] He was a son of Herod the Great and a grandson of Antipater the Idumaean. He is widely known today for accounts in the New Testament of his role in events that led to the executions of John the Baptist and Jesus of Nazareth ( Matthew 14:1–12 ).


Following the death of his father in 4 BC, Herod Antipas was recognized as tetrarch by Caesar Augustus, and subsequently by his own brother, the ethnarch Herod Archelaus. Antipas officially ruled Galilee and Perea as a client state of the Roman Empire. [4] [5] He was responsible for building projects at Sepphoris and Betharamphtha, and for the construction of his capital Tiberias on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee. Named in honour of his patron, the emperor Tiberius, the city later became a centre of rabbinic learning after the Jewish-Roman wars (66-135 AD).

Antipas divorced his first wife Phasaelis, the daughter of King Aretas IV of Nabatea, in favour of Herodias, who had formerly been married to his half-brother Herod II. (Antipas was Herod the Great's son by Malthace, while Herod II was his son by Mariamne II.) [6] [7] According to the New Testament Gospels, it was John the Baptist's condemnation of this arrangement that led Antipas to have him arrested; John was subsequently put to death in Machaerus. Besides provoking his conflict with John the Baptist, the tetrarch's divorce added a personal grievance to previous disputes with Aretas over territory on the border of Perea and Nabatea. The result was a war that proved disastrous for Antipas; a Roman counter-offensive was ordered by Tiberius, but abandoned upon that emperor's death in 37 AD. In 39 AD Antipas was accused by his nephew Agrippa I of conspiracy against the Roman emperor Caligula, who sent him into exile in Gaul, according to Josephus. Accompanied there by Herodias, he died at an unknown date. [8]

The Gospel of Luke states that Jesus was first brought before Pontius Pilate for trial, since Pilate was the governor of Roman Judea, which encompassed Jerusalem where Jesus was arrested. Pilate initially handed him over to Antipas, in whose territory Jesus had been most active, but Antipas sent him back to Pilate's court.

Early life

Antipas was a son of Herod the Great, who had become king of Judea, and Malthace, who was from Samaria. [9] His date of birth is unknown but was before 20 BC. [10] Antipas, his full brother Archelaus and his half-brother Philip, were educated in Rome. [11]

Antipas was not Herod's first choice of heir. That honour fell to Aristobulus and Alexander, Herod's sons by the Hasmonean princess Mariamne. It was only after they were executed (c. 7 BC), and Herod's oldest son Antipater was convicted of trying to poison his father (5 BC), that the now elderly Herod fell back on his youngest son Antipas, revising his will to make him heir. [12] During his illness in 4 BC, Herod had yet another change of heart about the succession. According to the final version of his will, Antipas' elder brother Archelaus was now to become king of Judea, Idumea and Samaria, while Antipas would rule Galilee and Perea with the lesser title of tetrarch. Philip was to receive Gaulanitis (the Golan Heights), Batanaea (southern Syria), Trachonitis and Auranitis (Hauran). [13]

Because of Judea's status as a Roman client kingdom, Herod's plans for the succession had to be ratified by Augustus. The three heirs therefore travelled to Rome to make their claims, Antipas arguing he ought to inherit the whole kingdom and the others maintaining that Herod's final will ought to be honoured. Despite qualified support for Antipas from Herodian family members in Rome, who favoured direct Roman rule of Judea but considered Antipas preferable to his brother, Augustus largely confirmed the division of territory set out by Herod in his final will. Archelaus had, however, to be content with the title of ethnarch rather than king. [14]


4 BC to c. 39 AD

Domain given to Herod Antipas, as Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, by Augustus in 4 BC Antipas Tetrarchy.jpg
Domain given to Herod Antipas, as Tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, by Augustus in 4 BC

After the death of Herod the Great in 4 BC, Augustus confirmed the testament of the dead king by making Antipas tetrarch of Galilee and Perea, a region he would rule for the next forty-two years. [15] The two territories were separated by the region of the Decapolis, with Galilee to the north and Perea to the south (see map). Threats to stability in both areas would have been clear to Antipas when he took office. While he had been making his case to Augustus in Rome, dissidents led by Judas, son of Hezekiah, had attacked the palace of Sepphoris in Galilee, seizing money as well as weapons which they used to terrorize the area. [16] In a counterattack ordered by Quinctilius Varus, Roman governor of Syria, Sepphoris was destroyed by fire and its inhabitants sold as slaves. [17] Perea, meanwhile, bordered on the kingdom of Nabatea, which had long had uneasy relations with Romans and Jews. [18]

Part of Antipas' solution was to follow in his father's footsteps as a builder. He rebuilt and fortified Sepphoris, while also adding a wall to Betharamphtha in Perea. [19] The latter city was renamed Livias after Augustus' wife Livia, and later Julias after his daughter. [20] However, the tetrarch's most noted construction was his capital on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee, Tiberias, so named to honour his patron Tiberius, who had succeeded Augustus as emperor in 14 AD. [21] Residents could bathe nearby at the warm springs of Emmaus, and by the time of the First Jewish-Roman War the city's buildings included a stadium, a royal palace and a sanctuary for prayer. [22] It gave its name to the sea and later became a centre of rabbinic learning after the Jewish-Roman wars. [23] However, pious Jews at first refused to live in it because it was built atop a graveyard and therefore a source of ritual impurity. Antipas had to colonize it with a mixture of foreigners, forced migrants, poor people, and freed slaves. [24]

At other times Antipas was more sensitive to Jewish tradition. His coins carried no images, which would have violated Jewish prescriptions against idolatry. [25] When Pontius Pilate, governor of Judea from 26 AD to 36 AD, caused offence by placing votive shields in the Antonia palace at Jerusalem, Antipas and his brothers successfully petitioned for their removal. [26]

John the Baptist and Jesus

Jesus before Herod Antipas, Albrecht Durer, 1509 Jesus-och-Herodes.jpg
Jesus before Herod Antipas, Albrecht Dürer, 1509

Marriage to Herodias

Early in his reign, Antipas had married the daughter of King Aretas IV of Nabatea. However, on a visit to Rome he stayed with his half-brother Herod II and there he fell in love with his wife, Herodias, granddaughter of Herod the Great and Mariamne I, and the two agreed to marry after Herod Antipas had divorced his wife. [27] Aretas' daughter learned of the plan and asked permission to travel to the frontier fortress of Machaerus, whence Nabatean forces escorted her to her father. With his daughter safe in his custody, Aretas now could declare war on Herod. [28] Josephus says that Aretas was joined in this war by 'fugitives from the tetrarchy of Phillip', [29] whereas Moses of Chorene says that Aretas was joined by the Edessan army. [30] It is said that the joint Petra-Edessan army prevailed over the forces of Herod Antipas.

It is generally agreed that the war, in which Herod was defeated, occurred in 36 AD, a year before the death of the emperor Tiberius. A point of contention today is how long before this date Herod's marriage to Herodias took place. Some surmise that the marriage of Antipas and Herodias took place shortly before the war in about 34 AD, after the death of Philip, [31] but others have pointed to Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews (Book 18, chapter 5, paragraph 4) comment that Herodias "divorced herself from her husband while he was alive" to argue that it took place before Herod II's death, in about 27 AD, thus making it possible for Jesus to have been born in the reign of Herod the Great (as indicated by the Gospel of Matthew) and to have died in his early 30s (as indicated by the Gospel of Luke). [32]

John's ministry and execution

Antipas faced more immediate problems in his own tetrarchy after John the Baptist, in 28/29 AD according to the Gospel of Luke [33] (or 27 AD, if the co-regency of Augustus and Tiberius is included in Luke's reckoning of time, for which there is some evidence), began a ministry of preaching and baptism by the Jordan River, which marked the western edge of Antipas' territory of Perea. The Gospels state that John attacked the tetrarch's marriage as contrary to Jewish law (it was incestuous, as Herodias was also Antipas' niece, but also John criticized the fact that she was his brother's wife ( Mark 6:18 ), (lending credence to the belief that Antipas and Herodias married while Herod II was still alive), while Josephus says that John's public influence made Antipas fearful of rebellion. [34] John was imprisoned in Machaerus and executed. [35] According to Matthew and Mark, Herod was reluctant to order John's death but was compelled by Herodias' daughter (unnamed in the text but named by Josephus as Salome), to whom he had promised any reward, up to half his kingdom, she chose as a result of her dancing for guests at his birthday banquet. [36]

Jesus' ministry and trial

Among those baptized by John was Jesus of Nazareth, who began his own ministry in Galilee, causing Antipas, according to Matthew and Mark, to fear that John had been raised from the dead. [37] Luke alone among the Gospels states that a group of Pharisees warned Jesus that Antipas was plotting his death, whereupon Jesus denounced the tetrarch as a "fox" and declared that he, Jesus, would not fall victim to such a plot because "it cannot be that a prophet should perish away from Jerusalem". [38] Luke also credits the tetrarch with a role in Jesus' trial. According to Luke, Pilate, on learning that Jesus was a Galilean and therefore under Herod's jurisdiction, sent him to Antipas, who was also in Jerusalem at the time. Initially, Antipas was pleased to see Jesus, hoping to see him perform a miracle, but when Jesus remained silent in the face of questioning, Antipas mocked him and sent him back to Pilate. Luke says that these events improved relations between Pilate and Herod despite their earlier enmity. [39]

The reason for Antipas' involvement has been debated. Theodor Mommsen argued that the normal legal procedure of the early Roman empire was for defendants to be tried by the authorities of their home provinces. [40] A. N. Sherwin-White re-examined the relevant legal texts and concluded that trials were generally based on the location of the alleged crimes, but that there was a possibility of referral to a province of origin in special cases. [41] If Pilate was not required to send Jesus to Antipas, he may have been making a show of courtesy to the tetrarch [42] and trying to avoid the need to deal with the Jewish authorities himself. [43] When Jesus was sent back, Pilate could still have represented Antipas' failure to convict as support for his own view (according to Luke) that Jesus was not guilty of a capital offence, [44] thus allowing him to avoid responsibility for Jesus' crucifixion. [45]

Historicity of Gospel narrative

Due to the lack of historical evidence, it has been suggested that Jesus' trial by Herod Antipas is unhistorical. [46] For example, Robin Lane Fox, an English historian, alleges that the story was invented based on Psalm 2, in which "the kings of the earth" are described as opposing the Lord's "anointed", and also served to show that the authorities failed to find grounds for convicting Jesus. [47]

Later reign

Herod (Herode), by French painter and Bible illustrator James Tissot, in the Brooklyn Museum Brooklyn Museum - Herod (Herode) - James Tissot - overall.jpg
Herod (Hérode), by French painter and Bible illustrator James Tissot, in the Brooklyn Museum

Between 34 and 36 AD [48] [49] the conflict with Aretas of Nabatea, caused by Antipas' divorce from Aretas' daughter and the rulers' disagreement over territory, developed into open war. Antipas' army suffered a devastating defeat after fugitives from the former tetrarchy of Philip sided with the Nabateans, and Antipas was forced to appeal to Tiberius for help. The emperor ordered Lucius Vitellius, governor of Syria, to march against Aretas and ensure that he was captured or killed. [50] Vitellius obediently mobilized two legions, sending them on a detour around Judea while he joined Antipas in attending a festival at Jerusalem. While staying there he learned of the death of Tiberius (16 March 37 AD), concluded he lacked the authority to go to war, and recalled his troops. [51]

Josephus implies that Vitellius was unwilling to cooperate with the tetrarch because of a grudge he bore from an earlier incident. According to his account, Antipas provided hospitality at a conference on the Euphrates between Vitellius and King Artabanus III of Parthia, and after Vitellius' diplomatic success anticipated the governor in sending a report to Tiberius. [52] However, other sources place the meeting between Vitellius and Artabanus under Tiberius' successor Caligula, [53] leading some historians to think that Josephus misdated it to the reign of Tiberius or conflated it with an earlier diplomatic meeting involving Antipas and Vitellius. [54]

Exile and death

Antipas' fall from power was due to Caligula and to his own nephew Agrippa, brother of Herodias. When Agrippa fell into debt during the reign of Tiberius despite his connections with the imperial family, Herodias persuaded Antipas to provide for him, but the two men quarrelled and Agrippa departed. After Agrippa was heard expressing to his friend Caligula his eagerness for Tiberius to die and leave room for Caligula to succeed him, he was imprisoned. When Caligula finally became emperor in 37 AD, he not only released his friend but granted him rule of Philip's former tetrarchy (slightly extended), with the title of king. [55]

Josephus relates that Herodias, jealous at Agrippa's success, persuaded Antipas to ask Caligula for the title of king for himself. However, Agrippa simultaneously presented the emperor with a list of charges against the tetrarch: allegedly, he had conspired against Tiberius with Sejanus (executed in 31 AD) and was now plotting against Caligula with Artabanus. As evidence, Agrippa noted that Antipas had a stockpile of weapons sufficient for 70,000 men. Hearing Antipas' admission to this last charge, Caligula decided to believe the allegations of conspiracy. In the summer of 39 AD, Antipas' money and territory were turned over to Agrippa, while Antipas was exiled. [56] Lugdunum, identified with Lugdunum Convenarum, now Saint-Bertrand-de-Comminges, was the place of his exile, as recorded by Josephus in Antiquities . [57] Caligula offered to allow Herodias, as Agrippa's sister, to retain her property. However, she chose instead to join her husband in exile. [58]

Antipas died in exile. [59] The 3rd-century historian Cassius Dio seems to imply that Caligula had him killed, but this is usually treated with skepticism by modern historians. [60]


Herod Antipas as portrayed in the Nuremberg Chronicle Nuremberg chronicles f 096v 1.png
Herod Antipas as portrayed in the Nuremberg Chronicle

Among the followers of Jesus and members of the early Christian movement mentioned in the New Testament are Joanna, the wife of one of Antipas' stewards, and Manaen, a "foster-brother" or "companion" of Antipas (both translations are possible for the Greek σύντροφος). It has been conjectured that these were sources for early Christian knowledge of Antipas and his court. [61] In any case, Antipas featured prominently in the New Testament in connection with the deaths of John the Baptist and Jesus. The pseudepigraphical Gospel of Peter went further, stating that it was Antipas rather than Pilate who ordered the crucifixion of Jesus. In line with the work's anti-Judaic theme, it pointedly remarked that Herod and "the Jews", unlike Pilate, refused to "wash their hands" of responsibility for the death. [62]

Antipas has appeared in a large number of representations of the passion of Jesus – most notably portrayed by Frank Thring in King of Kings (1961), José Ferrer in The Greatest Story Ever Told (1965), and Christopher Plummer in Jesus of Nazareth (1977). Often, as in the films Jesus Christ Superstar (1973) and The Passion of the Christ (2004), Antipas is portrayed as effeminate (Antipas was played in those films by Joshua Mostel and Luca De Dominicis respectively); the origin of this tradition may have been Antipas' manipulation by his wife Herodias, as well as Christ's description of him as a "fox" in Luke 13:32, using a feminine word in the original Greek. [63] In Salome (1953), he is portrayed by Charles Laughton, opposite Dame Judith Anderson as Herodias and Rita Hayworth in the title role. He features in Salomé (1923) by Mitchell Lewis. He also features in The Secret Magdalene by Ki Longfellow. In Longfellow's view, he was not effeminate so much as rash, ineffective, and when backed into a corner by his furious ex-father-in-law, willing to do anything to save himself.

In Gustave Flaubert's "Herodias" (1877), Herodias uses her long-concealed daughter, Salome, to manipulate Herod sexually for her own political purposes. This conceit (original with Flaubert) inspired Oscar Wilde's play "Salome" (1891), the first version of the legend to show Salome with a will of her own, opposing her mother and lusting after John the Baptist herself. Naive and puzzled by her stepfather's lascivious attentions, the young girl arouses Herod in order to avenge herself on the prophet who has refused her advances. Flaubert's novella was turned into an opera by Jules Massenet (1881) in which Salome, ignorant of her royal parentage, becomes a disciple of the Baptist, who is then executed by the lustful and jealous Herod (a baritone). In Richard Strauss's operatic setting of Wilde's play (1905), Herod, one of the most difficult tenor roles in the repertory, is depicted as befuddled by both drink and lust, and in bitter conflict with his wife (as in Flaubert). At the end of the opera (as in Wilde's play), disgusted with Salome's behavior with the head of John, he orders her execution.

Flaubert's novella was also, very roughly, the basis of the 1953 film "Salome," a Rita Hayworth vehicle directed by William Dieterle, in which the girl is implausibly unaware that her dancing will be used by her mother (Judith Anderson) to secure Herod's (Charles Laughton) consent to the execution of John the Baptist (Alan Badel).

Family tree

Aretas IV
King of Arabia
PhasaelisHerod Antipas
Simon Boethus
(High Priest)
Alexander I Alexandra Antipater
the Idumaean
Aristobulus III
d. 35 BCE
Doris Cleopatra
of Jerusalem
Mariamne II Mariamne I
d. 29 BCE
the Great
Salome I Phasa'el PherorasJoseph
Alexander II
d. 7 BCE
(daughter of Salome I)
Aristobulus IV
d. 7 BCE
Herod II Herodias Herod Antipas Mariamne III Herod Archelaus Glaphyra Olympias Joseph ben Joseph
Philip the Tetrarch
d. 34 CE
Salome Aristobulus of Chalcis
Antipater II
d. 4 BCE

See also


  1. "14:1 – John the Baptist Beheaded". Matthew (NASB ed.). Bible Gateway. Retrieved 2018-04-16. At that
  2. "6:14–29 – John's Fate Recalled". Mark (NASB ed.). BibleGateway.com . Retrieved 2018-04-16. And King Herod
  3. Jeffers, James S. (2000). The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era: Exploring the Background of Early Christianity. Intervarsity Press. p. 125. ISBN   978-0-83081589-0 . Retrieved 29 September 2016.
  4. Marshall, Taylor, 2012. The Eternal City, Dallas: St. John, pp. 35–65.
  5. Steinmann, Andrew, 2011. From Abraham to Paul: A Biblical Chronology, St. Louis: Concordia, pp. 235–38.
  6. Bruce, Frederick Fyvie (1990). The Acts of the Apostles. Eerdmans. p. 96. ISBN   978-0-80280966-7 . Retrieved 2013-05-02.
  7. "The House of Herod". Virtual religion. Retrieved 2013-05-02.
  8. Josephus, Antiquities 18.181.
  9. Josephus, Antiquities 17.20, War 1.562.
  10. Milwitzky 638.
  11. Josephus, Antiquities 17.2021.
  12. Bruce 67; Schürer 320325.
  13. Josephus, Antiquities 17.188189, War 1.664.
  14. Josephus, Antiquities 17.224249, 299323.
  15. Bruce 8.
  16. Josephus, Antiquities 17.271272, War 2.56. This Judas may be identical with the Judas of Galilee who led resistance to the Census of Quirinius (Schürer 381).
  17. Josephus, Antiquities 17.288289, War 2.68.
  18. For Nabatean history, see Schürer 574586.
  19. Josephus, Antiquities 18.27, War 2.168.
  20. Bruce 9; Schürer 342.
  21. Josephus, Antiquities 18.36.
  22. Schürer 342343.
  23. Bruce 9, citing John 6:1 and 21:1 for the "Sea of Tiberias".
  24. Josephus, Antiquities 18.3738.
  25. Schürer 343 and n. 16.
  26. Philo, On the Embassy to Gaius 299305.
  27. Josephus, Antiquities 18.109110 Mark 6:17
  28. Josephus, Antiquities 18.111113.
  29. Josephus, Antiquities 18.109 (18.5.1).
  30. Moses of Chorene, History of Armenia 2:29.
  31. Kokkinos, The Herodian Dynasty, pp. 268, 277.
  32. Stewart Perowne, The Later Herods p. 49, (Bruce 10 n. 16; Schürer 344 and n. 19)
  33. Luke 3:1.
  34. Matthew 14:3–4; Mark 6:17–18; Luke 3:19; Josephus, Antiquities 18.118.
  35. Josephus, Antiquities 18.119.
  36. Matthew 14:6–11; Mark 6:19–28.
  37. Matthew 14:1–2; Mark 6:14–16; cf. Luke 9:7–9.
  38. Luke 13:31–33. The "fox" had been interpreted as a symbol of either cunning or destruction (Schürer 342 and n. 5). Robert H. Gundry, noting that the Greek word is feminine, suggests that "Jesus is calling Herod a vixen ... not an animal to be afraid of or to run away from" (Gundry 3).
  39. Luke 23:5–12.
  40. Cited by Sherwin-White 28.
  41. Sherwin-White 2831.
  42. Bruce 1617; Hoehner 88.
  43. Hoehner 88.
  44. Luke 23:13–16; Bruce 17; Hoehner 8990.
  45. Hoehner 90.
  46. Jensen 121.
  47. Lane Fox 297, citing Psalm 2:2 (also quoted in Acts 4:26).
  48. Kenneth Frank Doig (1990). "New Testament Chronology". Nowoezone.com. Retrieved 2018-04-16.
  49. "Paul's departure from Damascus (2 Cor 11:32; Acts 9) took place as early as AD 34" – Appendix A – Chronology of Paul's Life
  50. Josephus, Antiquities 18.113115; Schürer 350.
  51. Josephus, Antiquities 18.120126; Schürer 350.
  52. Josephus, Antiquities 18.101105.
  53. Suetonius, Caligula 14.3; Dio 59.27.23.
  54. Bruce 1819; Schürer 350351.
  55. Josephus, Antiquities 18.143239, War 2.178181; Bruce 1920.
  56. Josephus, Antiquities 18.240252, War 2.181183. For the date, see Schürer 352353 n. 42.
  57. Josephus, Antiquities 18.181.
  58. Josephus, Antiquities 2.181.
  59. Josephus, War 2.183.
  60. Dio 59.8.2; Milwitzky 639. Schürer calls Dio's statement "confused" (353), while Bruce simply remarks that "in exile Antipas and Herodias together disappear from history" (21).
  61. Luke 8:3 and Acts 13:1, with Bruce 1314; Lane Fox 297 is skeptical.
  62. Gospel of Peter 1.
  63. Gundry 3, endorsed by Goodacre passim.

Related Research Articles

The 30s decade ran from January 1, AD 30, to December 31, AD 39.

AD 36 (XXXVI) was a leap year starting on Sunday of the Julian calendar. At the time, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Allenius and Plautius. The denomination AD 36 for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.

AD 39 (XXXIX) was a common year starting on Thursday of the Julian calendar. At the time, it was known as the Year of the Consulship of Augustus and Caesianus. The denomination AD 39 for this year has been used since the early medieval period, when the Anno Domini calendar era became the prevalent method in Europe for naming years.

Herod may refer to:

Herod I, also known as Herod the Great, was a Roman Jewish client king of Judea, referred to as the Herodian kingdom. He is known for his colossal building projects throughout Judea, including his renovation of the Second Temple in Jerusalem and the expansion of the Temple Mount towards its north, the enclosure around the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron, the construction of the port at Caesarea Maritima, the fortress at Masada, and Herodium. Vital details of his life are recorded in the works of the 1st century CE Roman–Jewish historian Josephus.

Abilene or simply Abila was a plain, a district in Coele-Syria, of which the chief town was Abila Lysaniou. The limits of this region are nowhere exactly defined, but it seems to have included the eastern slopes of the Anti-Lebanon range, and to have extended south and southeast of Damascus as far as the borders of Galilaea, Batanaea, and Trachonitis. According to Flavius Josephus, Abilene was a separate Iturean kingdom until 37 AD.

Herod Agrippa King of Judaea (11 BC-AD 44) (r. 41-AD 44)

Herod Agrippa, also known as Herod II or Agrippa I, was a King of Judea from AD 41 to 44. He was the last ruler with the royal title reigning over Judea and the father of Herod Agrippa II, the last king from the Herodian dynasty. The grandson of Herod the Great and son of Aristobulus IV and Berenice, he is the king named Herod in the Acts of the Apostles 12:1: "Herod (Agrippa)".

Salome Biblical daughter of Herod II and Herodias

Salome, the daughter of Herod II and Herodias, granddaughter of Herod the Great and stepdaughter of Herod Antipas, is known from the New Testament, where she is not named, and from an account by Flavius Josephus. In the New Testament, the stepdaughter of Herod Antipas demands and receives the head of John the Baptist. According to Josephus, she was first married to her uncle Philip the Tetrarch, after whose death, she married her cousin Aristobulus of Chalcis, thus becoming queen of Chalcis and Armenia Minor.

Herodias 1st century AD Herodian Dynasty princess

Herodias was a princess of the Herodian dynasty of Judaea during the time of the Roman Empire. Christian writings connect her with John the Baptist's execution.

Chronology of Jesus Timeline of the life of Jesus

A chronology of Jesus aims to establish a timeline for the events of the life of Jesus. Scholars have correlated Jewish and Greco-Roman documents and astronomical calendars with the New Testament accounts to estimate dates for the major events in Jesus's life.

Judaea (Roman province) Province of the Roman Empire (6–135 CE)

Judaea was a Roman province which incorporated the regions of Judea, Samaria, and Idumea, and extended over parts of the former regions of the Hasmonean and Herodian kingdoms of Judea. It was named after the Tetrarchy of Judaea, but the Roman province encompassed a much larger territory. The name "Judaea" was derived from the Iron Age Kingdom of Judah.

Aretas IV Philopatris Nabataean king from 9 BC to 40 AD

Aretas IV Philopatris was the King of the Nabataeans from roughly 9 BC to AD 40.

Herodian dynasty Royal dynasty of Idumaean (Edomite) descent

The Herodian dynasty was a royal dynasty of Idumaean (Edomite) descent, ruling the Herodian Kingdom and later the Herodian Tetrarchy, as a vassal state of the Roman Empire. The Herodian dynasty began with Herod the Great, who assumed the throne of Judea, with Roman support, bringing down the century long Hasmonean Kingdom. His kingdom lasted until his death in 4 BCE, when it was divided between his sons as a Tetrarchy, which lasted for about 10 years. Most of those tetrarchies, including Judea proper, were incorporated into Judaea Province from 6 CE, though limited Herodian de facto kingship continued until Agrippa I's death in 44 CE and nominal title of kingship continued until 92 CE, when the last Herodian monarch, Agrippa II, died and Rome assumed full power over his de jure domain.

Herodian Tetrarchy Four-way division of Herod the Greats Levantine kingdom upon his death

The Herodian Tetrarchy was formed following the death of Herod the Great in 4 BCE, when his kingdom was divided between his sons Herod Archelaus as ethnarch, Herod Antipas and Philip as tetrarchs in inheritance, while Herod's sister Salome I briefly ruled a toparchy of Jamnia. Upon the deposition of Herod Archelaus in 6 CE, his territories were transformed into a Roman province. With the death of Salome I in 10 CE, her domain was also incorporated into the province. However, other parts of the Herodian Tetrarchy continued to function under Herodians. Thus, Philip the Tetrarch ruled Batanea, with Trachonitis, as well as Auranitis until 34 CE, while Herod Antipas ruled Galilee and Perea until 39 CE. The last notable Herodian ruler with some level of independence was Agrippa I, who was even granted the Judea province, though with his death in 44 CE, the provincial status of Judea was restored for good.

Philip the Tetrarch Son of Herod the Great and ruler of part of his fathers kingdom

Philip the Tetrarch, sometimes called Herod Philip II by modern writers, son of Herod the Great and his fifth wife, Cleopatra of Jerusalem, ruled over the northeast part of his father's kingdom between 4 BCE and 34 CE. He was a half-brother of Herod Antipas and Herod Archelaus and should not be confused with Herod II, whom some writers call Herod Philip I.

Costobarus was an associate of Herod the Great and second husband of Herod's sister Salome I. He was also known as Costobar.

Aristobulus of Britannia 1st-century Christian bishop in Britannia and saint

Aristobulus of Britannia is a Christian saint named by Hippolytus of Rome (170–235) and Dorotheus of Gaza (505–565) as one of the Seventy Disciples mentioned in Luke 10:1–24 and as the first bishop in Roman Britain.

Herodian Kingdom of Judea Client state of the Roman Republic from 37 to 4 BCE

The Herodian Kingdom of Judea was a client state of the Roman Republic from 37 BCE, when Herod the Great was appointed "King of the Jews" by the Roman Senate. When Herod died in 4 BCE, the kingdom was divided among his sons into the Herodian Tetrarchy.

Chalcis was a small ancient Iturean majority kingdom situated in the Beqaa Valley, named for and originally based from the city of the same name. The ancient city of Chalcis (a.k.a. Chalcis sub Libanum, Chalcis of Coele-Syria was located midway between Berytus and Damascus. The modern town of Anjar in Lebanon is believed to be the site of ancient Chalcis sub Libanum, although this has not been definitively demonstrated. The ruins of a Roman temple are located a few kilometers south-west of Anjar near Majdal Anjar. Other sources indicate that Chalcis sub Libanum is located at "Husn esh-Shadur" near Baalbek.


Herod Antipas
 Died: after 39 AD
Preceded by Tetrarch of Galilee
4 BC 39 AD
Succeeded by