Missing letter effect

Last updated

In cognitive psychology, the missing letter effect refers to the finding that, when people are asked to consciously detect target letters while reading text, they miss more letters in frequent function words (e.g. the letter "h" in "the") than in less frequent, content words. [1] [2] Understanding how, why and where this effect arises becomes useful in explaining the range of cognitive processes that are associated with reading text. [2] The missing letter effect has also been referred to as the reverse word superiority effect, since it describes a phenomenon where letters in more frequent words fail to be identified, instead of letter identification benefitting from increased word frequency.

Contents

The method in which researchers utilise to measure this effect is termed a letter detection task. This involves a paper-and-pencil procedure, where readers are asked to circle a target letter, such as "t" every time they come across it while reading a prose passage or text. [3] [4] Researchers measure the number of letter detection errors, or missed circled target letters, in the texts. The missing letter effect is more likely to appear when reading words that are part of a normal sequence, than when words are embedded in a mixed-up sequence (e.g. readers asked to read backwards). [5]

Despite the missing letter effect being a common phenomenon, there are different factors that have influence on the magnitude of this effect. Age (development), language proficiency and the position of target letters in words are some of these factors. [3]

Function vs content words

When testing for the missing letter effect, prose passages are used which incorporate a mix of common function words and rare content words. [4] [6] [7]

Common function words are words that are used and seen very frequently and regularly in every day texts. [8] These words are connector words for content words and consist of pronouns, articles, prepositions, conjunctions, and auxiliary verbs. [9] Common examples of function words include “the”, “and”, “on”, “of” and “for” [7] and majority of these words are short in length, consisting of usually around 1-4 letters. [9] Because of their frequency and commonness, these words are seldom paid attention to or consciously observed. [8] [9]

Content words usually consist of nouns and regular verbs and are more rare than frequent function words. [7] [9] These word types are usually given and paid more attention to. The word “ant” is an example of a rare content word in comparison to a structurally similar looking frequent function word like “and”. [4]

Letter detection tasks

An example of a simple letter detection task Letter detection task.pdf
An example of a simple letter detection task

Letter detection tasks are ones that are set up and used to prove and measure the missing letter effect. Participants of this task are given prose passages or continuous texts to read and are told to circle every occurrence of a target letter. [4] [3] The missing letter effect is determined when target letters are missed or not circled, and these omissions or letter detection errors occur more when reading frequent function words than in rare content words. [4] [6] [7] [10] Saint-Aubin and Poirier [7] reported from their experiment that there are higher accounts of letter detection omissions of the same word when it the word is presented as a definite article than when the word is a pronoun.

Hypotheses

Early

Two primary hypotheses tried to explain the missing letter effect: Healy (1994) emphasized identification processes playing a crucial role, almost entirely focusing on word frequency. [11] This hypothesis is primarily referred to as the unitization model [12] and relates to familiar visual configuration. [4] In this model, once readers have finished processing the text at a higher level (units like words), they move on and continue reading a different section of text, which interferes with the completion of processing of lower-level units (like letters). [2] [4] [10] Common words are processed and “read in terms of units larger than the letter (e.g. syllables or whole words) whereas rare words tend to be read in smaller units (e.g. letters)”. [4] The result is more letter detection errors occurring from insufficient processing of the lower-level units. [2] [4]

The processing time hypothesis also proposed by Healy, [2] provides an explanation for the missing letter effect. The amount of time readers or participants of letter detection tasks take to process a word, dictates the occurrence of letter detection errors and the missing letter effect. [4] The increase of processing time denotes the decrease of letter detection errors and the decrease of processing time follows as a result of an increase in word familiarity (or word frequency). [4] The missing letter effect occurs due to faster processing of common function words at the higher level than rare content words, a result of “the higher familiarity of their visual patterns”. [10]

Koriat & Greenberg (1994) give another explanation for the missing letter effect, viewing the structural role of the word within a sentence (i.e. function words vs. content words) to be crucial. [13] This is termed the "alternative structural hypothesis". Within this hypothesis, rather than putting focus on familiarity as a determinant of this effect, it is “the word’s role in syntactic structure of a sentence” which encompasses common function words “receding into the background…to allow more meaningful content words to be brought into the foreground”. [4] In this sense, the structural organization of texts overrules the perceptional organization (like the unitization model) in the occurrence of the missing letter effect. [7] In the early stages of processing a text, its structural frame is speculatively formulated by the readers, constructed from a fast but insufficient processing of function words and punctuation. [10] The missing letter effect unfolds as it is more difficult to detect target letters within function words as they are “pushed into the background” following structural analysis than it is to detect letters in content words which “stand in the foreground” and uncover the meaning of the text. [10]

Both accounts were thoroughly investigated, but neither could completely explain the effect. [14]

Contemporary

A new model called the guidance-organization (GO) model was recently proposed to potentially explain the missing letter effect. It is a combination of the two models proposed by Healy, Koriat, and Greenberg and illuminates the idea that word frequency and function together influence the rate of letter detection errors and omissions. [15] [10] Both the unitization and structural processes occur, but not concurrently. [4] During reading, unitization processing takes place before structural processing and assists “lexical identification”, particularly of common function words which establish the basis of the phrase or sentence's structural organisation. [15] The organisation of sentence structure proceeds to “guide attention” to the higher-level units and less frequent content words to understanding meaning. [15] As Greenberg et al. explain: "The time spent processing high-frequency function words at the whole-word level is relatively short, thereby enabling the fast and early use of these words to build a tentative structural frame." [15] In short, the GO model “is an account of how readers coordinate text elements to achieve on-line integration” and analysis of meaning of the text. [15] Although this hypothesis models the missing letter effect, its limitation is that it is difficult to relate to models of reading. [16]

Klein and Saint-Aubin [17] proposed the attentional-disengagement model similarly includes aspects of the two earlier models but emphasizes the role of attention in reading and comprehension. In this model, letter detection errors increase, and the magnitude of the missing letter effect increases when there is a rapid attentional disengagement from a word in which a target letter is embedded. [16] Saint-Aubin et al. propose that the likelihood of identifying a target letter within a word and/or text is contingent upon how much information about the possible presence of the target letter is available at that time. [18] The timing of attentional disengagement from a “target-containing” word, essentially produces the missing letter effect where attention disengages faster from functional words than content words. [18]

Influential Factors

Age (Development)

Developmental change, grade level and generally reading skills increase with age, and all of these factors have some influence on the missing letter effect. [10] [16] [19] The number of letter detection errors and size of the missing letter effect increases with age. [16] [19] When testing primary and elementary school children from grades one to four, the missing letter effect is higher for children who have better reading skills, where they tend to make more letter detection errors on function words than in rare content words. [16] When testing primary school children (second graders) with college students the same effect is found where the older students miss target letters in function words more frequently than younger students do. [19] When comparing adults and second graders, the missing letter effect gets larger with age but only when observing differences in letter detection errors in function words, not in word frequency. [10]

Researchers Greenberg, Koriat and Vellutino give reasoning for these findings and write that the “missing letter effect arises very early in reading, by the first or second grade, and that its magnitude increases with grade level”. [19] [16] As reading skills and ability improve through developmental changes, younger readers gain a greater ability to process and understand texts and their structure. [19] Because the configuration of texts and words influence the missing letter effect and letter detection errors, younger readers who have not yet developed enough to be conscious of text structure, are not affected as greatly as older readers by structural function words when analysing passages. [19]

The conclusions that the magnitude of the missing letter effect increases with age, development and grade level are consistent with both the GO model and the AD model. [10] [16] The hypotheses assume and depict that more developed, good readers, whom of which are generally older, display more responsiveness to word frequency, in that they omit more target letters to more frequent words than younger, less developed poor readers. [16] The missing letter effect is also incidental of word function, more so for older, more developed and better readers as they are better at “using information about the probable location of function words in a sentence”. [16]

Language Proficiency

The missing letter effect is influenced by the proficiency of language when proficiency differs across two or more languages for one person. [3] An experiment by Bovee and Raney recruited people who speak English proficiently and have a low proficiency level in Spanish to take part in a letter detection task with comprehension questions to follow. [3] Results show that more letter detection errors are made when the readers read passages in their proficient language compared to when the passages are written in the language they have a low proficiency level in. [3] Both function words and content words are presented in the texts and more letter omissions occur in function words than they do in content words when people read in their proficient language. [3] When people read texts in their less proficient language, they omit more target letters in content words than they do in function words. [3]

Both the GO and AD models are effective in explaining and predicting how the missing letter effect is greater for readers reading in their proficient language. [3] Word familiarity and a greater knowledge and understanding of word frequency for function words and their structural functions, allows readers (who read text in their first language) to process words in a “top-down” approach, and increases target letter omissions. [3] For readers reading in their less proficient language, their word familiarity and knowledge of word frequency and function is much more limited. [3] Because of this, readers process text more sufficiently and pay more attention to individual words and “letter by letter word identification”, which results in less omissions of target letters, and a smaller sized missing letter effect. [3]

Letter position in words

The position of letters in words and the position of suffix morphemes have an influence on word identification, letter detection, and the missing letter effect in texts. [20] [21] [22] The letters at the start and end of words, or the first and last letter of a word, contribute to how people read and recognize words. [21] When readers take part in the letter detection task and are given a connected text to read, there are less letter detection errors of a target letter (for example ‘t’) when it is situated as the initial letter of a word (e.g. tree) compared to when it is embedded into words (e.g. path). [21] Drewnowski and Healy account for this where the initial letter of a word is “more separable from the rest of the word” and is “easier to detect because it can be processed individually”. [21] When letters are transposed in words within a text, the last letter of these words is important in assisting target letter detection. [22] The pace of reading is reduced when letters are transposed in words which allows for more comprehensive processing and provides a reason for why the last letter of a word can be identified more easily. [22]

Drewnowski and Healy's (1980) experiments exhibit additional findings of significantly less letter detection errors when target letters embedded in a letter sequence are then embedded into other words than when the letter sequence appears as a “separate function word”. [21] For example, more letter detection errors of the target letter ‘t’ are made when the function word “the” is embedded into the content word “thesis” rather than when “the” appears on its own in a text. [21]

See also

Related Research Articles

Hyperlexia

Hyperlexia is a syndrome characterized by a child's precocious ability to read. It was initially identified by Norman E. Silberberg and Margaret C. Silberberg (1967), who defined it as the precocious ability to read words without prior training in learning to read, typically before the age of five. They indicated that children with hyperlexia have a significantly higher word-decoding ability than their reading comprehension levels. Children with hyperlexia also present with an intense fascination for written material at a very early age.

<i>Scriptio continua</i> Style of writing without spaces between words

Scriptio continua, also known as scriptura continua or scripta continua, is a style of writing without spaces, or other marks between the words or sentences. The form also lacks punctuation, diacritics, or distinguished letter case. In the West, the oldest Greek and Latin inscriptions used word dividers to separate words in sentences; however, Classical Greek and late Classical Latin both employed scriptio continua as the norm.

Agraphia is an acquired neurological disorder causing a loss in the ability to communicate through writing, either due to some form of motor dysfunction or an inability to spell. The loss of writing ability may present with other language or neurological disorders; disorders appearing commonly with agraphia are alexia, aphasia, dysarthria, agnosia, acalculia and apraxia. The study of individuals with agraphia may provide more information about the pathways involved in writing, both language related and motoric. Agraphia cannot be directly treated, but individuals can learn techniques to help regain and rehabilitate some of their previous writing abilities. These techniques differ depending on the type of agraphia.

Reading comprehension Ability to read single words, sentences and whole texts fluently and to understand them in context

Reading comprehension is the ability to process text, understand its meaning, and to integrate with what the reader already knows. Fundamental skills required in efficient reading comprehension are knowing meaning of words, ability to understand meaning of a word from discourse context, ability to follow organization of passage and to identify antecedents and references in it, ability to draw inferences from a passage about its contents, ability to identify the main thought of a passage, ability to answer questions answered in a passage, ability to recognize the literary devices or propositional structures used in a passage and determine its tone, to understand the situational mood conveyed for assertions, questioning, commanding, refraining etc. and finally ability to determine writer's purpose, intent and point of view, and draw inferences about the writer (discourse-semantics).

In cognitive psychology, the word superiority effect (WSE) refers to the phenomenon that people have better recognition of letters presented within words as compared to isolated letters and to letters presented within nonword strings. Studies have also found a WSE when letter identification within words is compared to letter identification within pseudowords and pseudohomophones.

Miscue analysis was originally developed by Ken Goodman for the purpose of understanding the reading process. It is a diagnostic tool that helps researchers/teachers gain insight into the reading process.

The generation effect is a phenomenon where information is better remembered if it is generated from one's own mind rather than simply read. Researchers have struggled to account for why generated information is better recalled than read information, but no single explanation has been sufficient.

Language production is the production of spoken or written language. In psycholinguistics, it describes all of the stages between having a concept to express and translating that concept into linguistic forms. These stages have been described in two types of processing models: the lexical access models and the serial models. Through these models, psycholinguists can look into how speeches are produced in different ways, such as when the speaker is bilingual. Psycholinguists learn more about these models and different kinds of speech by using language production research methods that include collecting speech errors and elicited production tasks.

Sentence processing takes place whenever a reader or listener processes a language utterance, either in isolation or in the context of a conversation or a text. Many studies of the human language comprehension process have focused on reading of single utterances (sentences) without context. Extensive research has shown that language comprehension is affected by context preceding a given utterance as well as many other factors.

Deep dyslexia is a form of dyslexia that disrupts reading processes. Deep dyslexia may occur as a result of a head injury, stroke, disease, or operation. This injury results in the occurrence of semantic errors during reading and the impairment of nonword reading.

Reading Taking in the meaning of letters or symbols

Reading is the process of taking in the sense or meaning of letters, symbols, etc., especially by sight or touch.

Alan Kennedy (psychologist)

Robert Alan Kennedy FRSE is emeritus professor of Psychology at the University of Dundee, and formerly research associate at the Laboratoire de Psychologie et Neurosciences Cognitives of Paris Descartes University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France. He carries out research into eye movement control in reading and the viewing of static and moving images and is the author of over 100 journal articles.

Extensive reading

Extensive Reading (ER) is the process of reading longer easier texts for an extended period of time without a breakdown of comprehension, feeling overwhelmed, or the need to take breaks. It stands in contrast to intensive or academic reading, which is focused on a close reading of dense shorter texts, typically not read for pleasure. Though used as a teaching strategy to promote second-language development, ER also applies to free voluntary reading and recreational reading both in and out of the classroom. ER is based on the assumption that we learn to read by reading.

Text annotation Adding a note or gloss to a text

Text annotation is the practice and the result of adding a note or gloss to a text, which may include highlights or underlining, comments, footnotes, tags, and links. Text annotations can include notes written for a reader's private purposes, as well as shared annotations written for the purposes of collaborative writing and editing, commentary, or social reading and sharing. In some fields, text annotation is comparable to metadata insofar as it is added post hoc and provides information about a text without fundamentally altering that original text. Text annotations are sometimes referred to as marginalia, though some reserve this term specifically for hand-written notes made in the margins of books or manuscripts. Annotations have been found to be useful and help to develop knowledge of English literature.

Word recognition

Word recognition, according to Literacy Information and Communication System (LINCS) is "the ability of a reader to recognize written words correctly and virtually effortlessly". It is sometimes referred to as "isolated word recognition" because it involves a reader's ability to recognize words individually from a list without needing similar words for contextual help. LINCS continues to say that "rapid and effortless word recognition is the main component of fluent reading" and explains that these skills can be improved by "practic[ing] with flashcards, lists, and word grids".

Dual-route hypothesis to reading aloud

The dual-route theory of reading aloud was first described in the early 1970s. This theory suggests that two separate mental mechanisms, or cognitive routes, are involved in reading aloud, with output of both mechanisms contributing to the pronunciation of a written stimulus.

Bilingual lexical access is an area of psycholinguistics that studies the activation or retrieval process of the mental lexicon for bilingual people.

The word frequency effect is a psychological phenomenon where recognition times are faster for words seen more frequently than for words seen less frequently. Word frequency depends on individual awareness of the tested language. The phenomenon can be extended to different characters of the word in non-alphabetic languages such as Chinese.

In psychology, the transposed letter effect is a test of how a word is processed when two letters within the word are switched.

Alice Fenvessy Healy is a psychologist and College Professor of Distinction Emeritus at the University of Colorado Boulder where she founded and directed the Center for Research on Training. She is known for her research in the field of cognitive psychology, spanning diverse topics including short-term memory, long-term memory, psycholinguistics, reading, decision-making, and cognitive training.

References

  1. ↑ Healy, A. F. (1976-05-01). "Detection errors on the word the: evidence for reading units larger than letters". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2 (2): 235–42. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.2.2.235. PMID   1271029. S2CID   18096103.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Healy, Alice F. (1994-09-01). "Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1 (3): 333–344. doi: 10.3758/BF03213975 . ISSN   1531-5320. PMID   24203518.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Bovee, Joanna C.; Raney, Gary E. (2016). "Evaluating missing-letter effects and comprehension in proficient and nonproficient languages". Applied Psycholinguistics. 37 (2): 285–301. doi:10.1017/S0142716414000563. ISSN   0142-7164.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 HEALY, ALICE F.; CUNNINGHAM, THOMAS F. (2014). "Detecting letters and words in prose passages: A test of alternative theoretical accounts of the missing letter effect". The American Journal of Psychology. 127 (3): 281–302. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.3.0281. ISSN   0002-9556. JSTOR   10.5406/amerjpsyc.127.3.0281. PMID   25588271.
  5. ↑ Drewnowski, A.; A. F. Healy (1977). "Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than the word". Memory & Cognition. 5 (1): 636–647. doi: 10.3758/BF03197410 . PMID   24203280.
  6. 1 2 Plamondon, Andréanne; Roy-Charland, Annie; Chamberland, Justin; Quenneville, Joannie; Laforge, Christian (2017). "The impact of familiarization strategies on the missing-letter effect". Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 70 (8): 1675–1683. doi:10.1080/17470218.2016.1199718. ISSN   1747-0218. PMID   27277381. S2CID   25891496.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Saint-Aubin, Jean; Poirier, Marie (1997-09-01). "The influence of word function in the missing-letter effect: Further evidence from French". Memory & Cognition. 25 (5): 666–676. doi: 10.3758/BF03211308 . ISSN   1532-5946.
  8. 1 2 Argamon, Shlomo; Shlomo, Levitan (2005-01-01). "Measuring the Usefulness of Function Words for Authorship Attribution".{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  9. 1 2 3 4 Chung, Cindy; Pennebaker, James (2007-01-01). "The Psychological Functions of Function Words". Social Communication.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Saint-Aubin, Jean; Klein, Raymond; Landry, Tina (2005-07-01). "Age changes in the missing-letter effect revisited". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 91 (2): 158–82. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.01.007. PMID   15890175.
  11. ↑ Healy, A. F. (April 23, 1994). "Letter detection: A window to unitization and other cognitive processes in reading text". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1 (3): 333–344. doi: 10.3758/BF03213975 . PMID   24203518 . Retrieved 2006-12-30.
  12. ↑ Greenberg, S. N., & Koriat, A. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1051.
  13. ↑ Koriat, A.; S. N. Greenberg (April 23, 1994). "The extraction of phrase structure during reading: Evidence from letter detection errors". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 1 (3): 345–356. doi: 10.3758/BF03213976 . PMID   24203519 . Retrieved 2006-12-30.
  14. ↑ Saint-Aubin, J.; R. M. Klein (2001). "Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 27 (1): 318–334. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.27.2.318. PMID   11318050.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Greenberg, S. N.; Healy A. F.; Koriat A.; Kreiner H. (2004). "The GO model: A reconsideration of the role of structure units in guiding and organizing text online". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 11 (1): 428–33. doi: 10.3758/bf03196590 . PMID   15376790.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Saint-Aubin, Jean; Klein, Raymond M. (2008). "The Influence of Reading Skills on the Missing-Letter Effect among Elementary School Students". Reading Research Quarterly. 43 (2): 132–146. doi:10.1598/RRQ.43.2.2. ISSN   0034-0553. JSTOR   20068335.
  17. ↑ Klein, Raymond (2016). "What a simple letter-detection task can tell us about cognitive processes in reading". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 25 (6): 417–425. doi:10.1177/0963721416661173. S2CID   4986632.
  18. 1 2 Saint-Aubin, Jean; Voyer, Daniel; Roy, Macha (2012-12-01). "Sex differences in the missing-letter effect: A question of reading or visual–spatial skills?". Learning and Individual Differences. 22 (6): 664–672. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.007. ISSN   1041-6080.
  19. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Greenberg, Seth N.; Koriat, Asher; Vellutino, Frank R. (1998-06-01). "Age Changes in the Missing-Letter Effect Reflect the Reader's Growing Ability to Extract the Structure from Text". Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 69 (3): 175–198. doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2441. ISSN   0022-0965. PMID   9654438.
  20. ↑ Klein, Raymond M.; Saint-Aubin, Jean (2016-12-01). "What a Simple Letter-Detection Task Can Tell Us About Cognitive Processes in Reading". Current Directions in Psychological Science. 25 (6): 417–424. doi:10.1177/0963721416661173. ISSN   0963-7214. S2CID   4986632.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Drewnowski, Adam; Healy, Alice F. (1980-06-01). "Missing -ing in reading: Letter detection errors on word endings". Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 19 (3): 247–262. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(80)90212-1. ISSN   0022-5371.
  22. 1 2 3 Guérard, Katherine; Saint-Aubin, Jean; Poirier, Marie; Demetriou, Constantina (2012). "Assessing the influence of letter position in reading normal and transposed texts using a letter detection task" (PDF). Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology. 66 (4): 227–238. doi:10.1037/a0028494. ISSN   1878-7290. PMID   22686154.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.