National Parliamentary Debate Association

Last updated

The National Parliamentary Debate Association (NPDA) is one of the two national intercollegiate parliamentary debate organizations in the United States. The other is the American Parliamentary Debate Association. Its membership is national with participating schools throughout the country. In 2015, NPDA was the largest debating organization in the United States with around 200-250 participating schools in any given year. [1]

Contents

The Rules of NPDA Debate

In tournaments sponsored or sanctioned by the NPDA, teams of two debate head-to-head. Tournaments issue a new topic each round, generally on issues such as politics, philosophy and current affairs. After the announcement of the topic, the two teams have a limited preparation time, which is 15 minutes plus the time it takes to walk to the furthest away round in which debates will be taking place (usually rounded to 20 minutes), during which to write out their respective cases.

The standard time limits for an NPDA debate are:

There are tournaments, however, at which these are modified, generally to a 7-7-7-7-5-5 format. The Claremont Colleges tournament, for instance, uses this 7-5 format. During constructive speeches, debaters may introduce new arguments and the speaker's opponents may rise to ask questions of the speaker. Constructive speakers can accept or reject any given question. Rebuttals are exclusively for summarizing the arguments that were made during constructives.

Over the past few years,[ when? ] many coaches and competitors have referred to the official title of speeches with different names. These are unofficial yet very popular with many judges:

There is a ban on quoted evidence. This simply means that the debaters may not bring in printed, published evidence and consult it during the round. It is expected that debaters will use their own pre-existing knowledge and research conducted prior to the start of the actual round to back their arguments with reasoning and empirical data. This places parli in stark contrast to the other common intercollegiate debate format, policy debate, where debaters may utilize quoted evidence.

Any mature debate circuit will develop its own customs and practices. Some people argue that the NPDA rules are very laissez-faire, preferring to let the norms of what constitutes valid argumentation be subjects for the debate itself. Others believe that, in recent years,[ when? ] the NPDA has been hesitant to allow its participants to engage in controversial, avant garde or "non-traditional" debate practices at its national championship tournament.

The NPDA Championship Tournament

The NPDA runs one debate tournament each year: the NPDA Championship Tournament, held in late March or early April at rotating host sites. While the inaugural tournament in 1994 only hosted around 40 teams, the 2004 Championship Tournament had over 300 in the field from over a half-dozen nations. The tournament's practices are generally modeled by smaller invitational tournaments, which provide the bulk of year-long competition. NPDA sanctions many of these tournaments, and the school that does the best at sanctioned invitationals over the course of the year is awarded a year-long sweepstakes championship.

Relationship to other tournaments and organizations

There are usually several NPDA-sanctioned invitational tournaments in the US to choose from on almost every weekend of the academic year. The largest of these tournaments include the Mile High Swing held in Januaryd co-hosted in recent years[ when? ] by Texas Tech University and the University of Utah in Salt Lake City, Utah, the season-opening Bowman Debates at William Jewell College in September, the Steve Hunt Classic held at Lewis & Clark College in October and the Paul Winters Invitational at the University of the Pacific in November.

Communicating between tournaments

Almost from its inception, the NPDA community has taken advantage of the Internet to continue debates (and to debate about debates) between tournaments and in the off-season. For years, this took place via the official electronic mailing list, much to the chagrin of those who saw that resource as best used for official communication such as posting tournament invitations and results.

Today, much of the online debate (especially between competitors) in the NPDA community takes place via the online forum Net-Benefits.net, founded by University of Southern California then-undergraduate Jed Link. The name "Net-Benefits" is a pun, referring to the debate paradigm by which the debate judge weighs the net benefits of two competing policies. The site is now an electronic hub for discourse and information on parliamentary debate.

NPDA National Champions

Every year since 1994, the organization has held a national championship tournament. Winning teams include:

YearTeamSchool
2024Tristan Keene & Brenna Seiersen Parliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2023Tristan Keene & Brenna Seiersen Parliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2022Jacob Tate & Maximus Renteria Rice University
2021Amanda Miskell & Ryan Rashid Parliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2020Mitch Deleel & Adeja Powell McKendree University
2019Co-champions: Jessica Jung1 & lila lavender2/Tom Kadie1 & Henry Tolchard1 Parliamentary Debate at Berkeley 1/Western Washington University 2
2018Kyle Bligen & Jazmine Buckley Mercer University
2017Co-champions: Ryan Kelly & Kaitlyn Bull/Will Starks & Quintin Brown Washburn University
2016David Hansen & Katelyn Johnson William Jewell College
2015Matt Casas & Anthony Joseph Kansas City Kansas Community College
2014Joshua Rivera & Benjamin Campbell Southern Illinois University Carbondale
2013Josh Rivera & Mike Selck Southern Illinois University Carbondale
2012Lauren Knoth & Josh Ramsey Washburn University
2011Hank Fields & Matt Gander University of Oregon
2010Brian Horton & Adam Testerman Texas Tech University
2009Max Alderman & David Pena University of Nevada, Reno
2008Kristen Owen & Anthony Putnicki Texas Tech University
2007Tim Kamermayer & Griffith Vertican Point Loma Nazarene University
2006Josh Anderson & Rachel Safran University of Puget Sound
2005Ian Samuel and Marie Tenny University of South Carolina
2004Glenn Prince and J. D. Shipman University of South Carolina
2003Michael Owens & Joshua Wilkerson University of Wyoming
2002Ben Garcia & Chris Richter University of Alaska Anchorage
2001Danny Barak & Will Trachman University of California, Berkeley
2000Ryan Kennedy & Jacob Stutzman Truman State University
1999Geof Brodak & Bill Herman Colorado State University
1998Heath Curtis & Rebekah Gilbert Concordia University, Seward
1997Dan Nelson & Marcus Paroske Regis University
1996Ryan Levy & Scott Ruthfield Rice University
1995Meredith Marine & Neal Sample University of Wyoming
1994Marcus Paroske & Tammy Schultz Regis University

Top speakers

YearSpeakerSchool
2024Jas Liu Whitman College
2023Brenna Seiersen Parliamentary Debate at Berkeley
2022Arshita Sandhiparthi University of the Pacific
2021Cam Wade Mercer University
2020Raine McDonagh Lewis & Clark College
2019Fiker Tesfaye Texas Tech University
2018Logan Kelley Texas Tech University
2017Grace MillerUniversity of Nevada, Reno
2016Ashe Tippins Western Washington University
2015Jazmine Buckley Mercer University
2014Marten King Whitman College
2013Miranda Morton Whitman College
2012Ben Reid McKendree University
2011Max Alderman University of Nevada, Reno
2010Will Van Treuren University of Colorado, Boulder
2009MaryAnn Almeida Willamette University
2008Kevin Calderwood Southern Illinois University Carbondale
2007Ryan Lawrence University of California, Berkeley
2006Joelle Perry Western Kentucky University
2005Marie Tenny University of South Carolina
2004Ian Samuel Truman State University
2003Kyle DeBeer Colorado College
2002Audrey Mink California State University, Long Beach
2001Katie Angliss Point Loma Nazarene University
2000Andrew Vogt Colorado College
1999Bill Herman Colorado State University
1998Daniel Nelson Regis University
1997Marcus Paroske Regis University
1996Ryan Levy Rice University
1995Nick Coburn-Palo Weber State University
1994Andrea Roth University of New Mexico

Commonly used books

See also

Related Research Articles

The Canadian University Society for Intercollegiate Debate is the national organization which governs all English language competitive university debating and public speaking in Canada. It sanctions several official annual tournaments and represents Canadian debating domestically and abroad. Its membership consists of student debating unions, sanctioned by their respective universities, from across Canada. CUSID has been described as "a student-run, parliamentary debate league with close ties to the American Parliamentary Debate Association".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Debate</span> Formal conversation, often between opposing viewpoints, on a topic

Debate is a process that involves formal discourse, discussion, and oral addresses on a particular topic or collection of topics, often with a moderator and an audience. In a debate, arguments are put forward for common opposing viewpoints. Debates have historically occurred in public meetings, academic institutions, debate halls, coffeehouses, competitions, and legislative assemblies. Debates have also been conducted for educational and recreational purposes, usually associated with educational establishments and debating societies. These debates emphasized logical consistency, factual accuracy, and emotional appeal to an audience. Modern forms of competitive debate also include rules for participants to discuss and decide upon the framework of the debates.

Lincoln–Douglas debate is a type of one-on-one competitive debate practiced mainly in the United States at the high school level. It is sometimes also called values debate because the format traditionally places a heavy emphasis on logic, ethical values, and philosophy. The Lincoln–Douglas debate format is named for the 1858 Lincoln–Douglas debates between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, because their debates focused on slavery and the morals, values, and logic behind it. LD debates are used by the National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA) competitions, and also widely used in related debate leagues such as the National Christian Forensics and Communication Association, the National Catholic Forensic League, the National Educational Debate Association, the Texas University Interscholastic League, Texas Forensic Association, Stoa USA and their affiliated regional organizations.

Policy debate is an American form of debate competition in which teams of two usually advocate for and against a resolution that typically calls for policy change by the United States federal government. It is also referred to as cross-examination debate because of the 3-minute questioning period following each constructive speech. Evidence presentation is a crucial part of policy debate. The main argument being debated during a round is to change or not change the status quo. When a team explains why their solvency is greater than the opposition's, they compare advantages. One team’s job is to argue that the resolution— the statement that we should make some specific change to a national or international problem —is a good idea. Affirmative teams generally present a plan as a proposal for implementation of the resolution. On the other hand, the Negative teams present arguments against the implementation of the resolution. In a single round of debate competition, each person gives two speeches. The first speech each person gives is called a “constructive” speech, because it is the speech when the first person of the team speaks positively, presenting the team's main idea without rebuttals that have not occurred, presents the basic arguments they will make throughout the debate. The second speech is called a “rebuttal”, because this is the speech where each person tries to rebut the arguments made by the other team, while using their own arguments to try to persuade the judge to vote for their team. The Affirmative has to persuade the judge to vote for the resolution, while the Negative has to persuade the judge the Negative's position is a better idea.

Congressional Debate is a competitive interscholastic high school debate event in the United States. The National Speech and Debate Association (NSDA), National Catholic Forensic League (NCFL) and many state associations and national invitational tournaments offer Congressional Debate as an event. Each organization and tournament offers its own rules, although the National Speech and Debate Association has championed standardization since 2007, when it began to ask its districts to use one of a number of procedures for qualification to its National Tournament.

The American Parliamentary Debate Association (APDA) is the oldest intercollegiate parliamentary debating association in the United States. APDA sponsors over 50 tournaments a year, all in a parliamentary format, as well as a national championship in late April. It also administers the North American Debating Championship with the Canadian University Society for Intercollegiate Debate (CUSID) every year in January. Although it is mainly funded by its member universities, APDA is an entirely student-run organization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Educational Debate Association</span>

The National Educational Debate Association (NEDA) is an American collegiate debate association emphasizing audience-centered debate. It was founded by debate educators who believe that the debate tournament is an extension of the communication classroom and that even competitive debates should provide students with skills of research, argument selection, and presentation style that will benefit them as public advocates. NEDA schedules eight invitational tournaments a year, primarily in the mid-west. The association debates two resolutions per year. The fall resolution is one of value, and the spring resolution is one of policy.

Public forum debate is a form of competitive debate which centers on current events and relies on both logic and evidence to construct arguments. It is primarily competed by middle and high school students, but college teams exist as well. Invented in the US, Public Forum is one of the most prominent American debate events, alongside policy debate and Lincoln-Douglas debate; it is also practiced in China and India, and has been recently introduced to Romania. Individuals give short speeches that are interspersed with 3 minute "Crossfire" sections, questions and answers between opposed debaters. The winner is determined by a judge who also serves as a referee. The debate centers on advocating or rejecting a position, "resolve", or "resolution", which is usually a proposal of a potential solution to a current events issue. Public Forum is designed to be accessible to the average citizen.

The World Schools Debating Championships (WSDC) is an annual English-language debating tournament for high school-level teams representing different nations.

Parliamentary style debate, colloquially oftentimes just Parliamentary debate, is a formal framework for debate used in debating societies, academic debate events and competitive debate. It has its roots in parliamentary procedure and develops differently in different countries as a result.

In policy debate, Lincoln-Douglas debate, and public forum debate, the flow is the name given to a specialized form of shorthand which debaters use to keep track of all of the arguments in the round.

In all forms of policy debate, the order of speeches is as follows:

Inter-collegiate policy debate is a form of speech competition involving two teams of two debaters from different colleges or universities based on a resolution phrased as something the United States federal government "should" do. Policy debate also exists as a high school activity, with a very similar format, but different leagues, tournaments, speech times, resolutions, and styles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Parliamentary Style</span> Style of competitive debate

British Parliamentary style is a major form of academic debate that originated in Liverpool in the mid 1800s. It has gained wide support globally and is the official format of the World Universities Debating Championship (WUDC).

World Schools Style debating is a combination of the British Parliamentary and Australia-Asian debating formats, designed to meet the needs of the World Schools Debating Championships tournament. Each debate comprises eight speeches delivered by two teams of three members, representing the Proposition and Opposition sides. The first six speeches are eight minutes in duration, with each team then finishing up by giving a four-minute concluding reply speech. Teams are given 30 to 60 minutes to prepare for their speeches.

Australia–Asia Debate, sometimes referred to as Australasian Debating or Australs Style, is a form of academic debate. In the past few years, this style of debating has increased in usage dramatically throughout both Australia and the Asian region, but in the case of Asian countries including Singapore, Malaysia, and the Philippines, the format is also used alongside the British Parliamentary Format. The context in which the Australia-Asia style of debate is used varies, but it is commonly used in Australia at the primary and secondary school level, ranging from small informal one-off intra-school debates to larger more formal inter-school competitions with several rounds and a finals series which occur over a year. It is also commonly used at university level.

Public debate may mean simply debating by the public, or in public. The term is also used for a particular formal style of debate in a competitive or educational context. Two teams of two compete through six rounds of argument, giving persuasive speeches on a particular topic.

Square Off is a television debate program broadcast on the ABS-CBN News Channel (ANC). It broadcasts every Friday at 6:00 pm PST, with replays throughout the week. The show is hosted by Maiki Oreta and is primarily sponsored by the Philippine Graphic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yale Debate Association</span>

The Yale Debate Association (YDA) is Yale University's only competitive intercollegiate debate team. Founded in 1908, it is the most prolific winner of the American Parliamentary Debate Association's Club of the Year award. The YDA was also the first American team to win and have the top speaker at the modern World Championships. Currently, the YDA is the fourth-ranked collegiate debate society in the world, and as of January 2024, the highest ranked in North America.

This is a glossary of policy debate terms.

References

  1. "About NPDA". National Parliamentary Debate Association. Archived from the original on 15 July 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  2. The Parli Prepbook
  3. Eric Robertson (2009). Strategic Argumentation in Parliamentary Debate. The author. ISBN   978-0-557-13537-0 via Google Books.
  4. John Meany; Kate Shuster (2002). Art, Argument, and Advocacy: Mastering Parliamentary Debate. IDEA. ISBN   978-0-9702130-7-5 via Google Books.
  5. John Meany; Kate Shuster (2003). On that Point!: An Introduction to Parliamentary Debate. IDEA. ISBN   978-0-9720541-1-9 via Google Books.
  6. Mark Crossman (2005). Burden of Proof: An Introduction to Government And Guide to Parliamentary Debate. CENGAGE Learning. ISBN   978-0-7593-6189-8 via Google Books.
  7. Richard E. Edwards (2008). Competitive Debate: The Official Guide. Alpha Books. ISBN   978-1-59257-693-7 via Google Books.