Empire
Gopal has written extensively about the impact of empire on contemporary culture in Britain and examined its broader social and cultural effects in South Asia and other former colonial societies. [17] [18] [19] According to Gopal,her motivation to speak about issues of empire and colonialism started with a disagreement with historian Niall Ferguson about the British Empire,on a 2006 edition of BBC Radio 4's Start the Week . [20]
In her book Insurgent Empire ,Gopal examines traditions of dissent on the question of empire and shows how rebellions and resistance in the colonies influenced British critics of empire in a process she calls "reverse tutelage". [21] She argues that ideas of freedom,justice,and common humanity had themselves taken shape in the struggle against imperialism. [22]
Gopal has also written about the historical amnesia surrounding empire and called for a more honest account of how Britain came to be what it is today. She argues that developing a demanding relationship to history is essential to understanding the formative and shaping nature of the imperial project on British life. [23] [24]
Churchill,empire and race
In October 2020,Churchill College set up a working group to critically examine Winston Churchill's views and actions relating to empire and race. The working group held two events:"Churchill,Empire and Race:Opening the Conversation" and "The Racial Consequences of Mr Churchill". The latter event took place on the 11th February 2021,chaired by Gopal. [25] It was subsequently criticised in the press after a speaker said that the British Empire was worse than the Nazis,and that Churchill was the "perfect embodiment of white supremacy". [26]
In June 2021,college Master Athene Donald ended the working group's role after a dispute between the College Council and the working party. In her statement,Donald stated that Gopal was frustrated over the Council's rejection of the Working Group's proposals for the third event. According to Donald,"the working group seems to have changed direction,with the second event not aligning with the initial proposals that council [the college’s trustee body] saw;nor did their suggestions for the third." [27] She said that Gopal consequently wrote that the group might as well dissolve themselves. Donald said that rightly or wrongly,she took that statement at face value and abruptly ended the role of the group. [28] [29] [30]
Gopal rejected the rationale given for the group's dissolution and said that the college had instead disbanded the group. She said that the disbanding was a way for the college to preempt the resignation of several members of the working group over the college pandering to the tabloid press and other groups. In her Twitter feed,Gopal accused the Daily Mail ,Policy Exchange and the Churchill family of pressuring the college to discontinue the event,accusing university leaders of "taking fright" after the backlash. [30] [29] [27]
In July 2021,a group of members of the working group released a statement denying that they had disbanded themselves and accused the college of not following due process in ending its role. The group also accused the College Council of undermining academic freedom and bringing the college into disrepute. [31]
Race and Decolonising the Curriculum
Gopal has been a long-standing advocate for 'decolonisation' of Cambridge’s English curriculum. In June 2017,a group of Cambridge students asked the university to include more black and ethnic minority writers in its English literature curriculum,an initiative strongly supported by Gopal. [32] She argues that decolonisation in the curriculum context is ‘about’having access to information and narratives,which reframe our understanding of the multiple lineages and sources of knowledge. [33]
In the context of racial discrimination in the United Kingdom,Gopal has discussed white fragility,suggesting that a "way of deflecting engagement with race is to personalise matters"; [34] a 2018 twitterstorm arising from Gopal arguing that a tweet by her Cambridge colleague Mary Beard represented white fragility has been taken as a case study by academic work on social media discourses about race. [35] In October 2019,Gopal criticised the Equality and Human Rights Commission report "Tackling racial harassment:Universities challenged" for its language and not addressing the systemic disadvantages faced by black and minority ethnic students or the ways whiteness dominates power structures and pedagogy. [36]
King's College racial profiling dispute
In June 2018,Gopal alleged racial profiling by college porters at the gate of King's College,Cambridge. Gopal said that she was subjected to racial profiling and aggression by the porters and gatekeepers of King's and that porters frequently hassled non-white staff and students at the gates. [37] [38] Gopal told a journalist from The Sunday Times it "was behaviour I very much doubt a white man of middle age who identified himself as a lecturer" would have faced. [39] Gopal announced that she would no longer teach at King's until there was a resolution to the problem. [40] [41]
As a result of the attention the issue received,Cambridge University students came forward describing similar experiences. Students of English at King's also issued an open letter in support of Gopal,urging the college to offer her a "proper apology",and two other supervisors from the English department said they would refuse to teach at King's. [38] King's denied that Gopal had been subject to racial profiling,and claimed that the CCTV footage of the incident revealed no wrongdoing by staff. [38] Gopal said that she received hate mail following her announcement. [42]
In October 2018,King's issued a statement announcing that it would put in place a "clearer and simpler means of reporting incidents" and that it would review its procedures for handling complaints. [43] Gopal said senior college members also conveyed their private apologies and assured her that the college was taking the problem seriously. Shortly afterwards,Gopal rescinded her decision to withdraw her labour from the college. [8]
Daily Mail false allegations against Gopal
In November 2020,the Daily Mail issued an apology and paid £25,000 in damages to Gopal after an opinion piece by Amanda Platell published in June 2020 falsely alleged that Gopal was "attempting to incite a race war and that she supported and endorsed the subjugation and persecution of white people" based on fake Twitter posts attributed to Gopal. [44] [45] [46] [47]
Criticism of Tony Sewell,chair of the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities
In March 2021,the Commission on Race and Ethnic Disparities,chaired by educational consultant Tony Sewell,released its report on race and ethnic disparities in the UK. [48] Gopal argued the report cherry-picked data and minimised and denied structural and institutional racism,asserting that it read like a propaganda document rather than a piece of research. [49] She also questioned whether Sewell had a doctorate. When she learned he did,Gopal tweeted:"Okay,established. It is,in fact,Dr Sewell. Fair enough. Even Dr Goebbels had a research PhD. (University of Heidelberg,1921)". The comparison to Goebbels,a prominent Nazi,attracted criticism from commentators writing for The Times and The Daily Telegraph . [50] [51] [52] [53] Gopal claimed that her remark was a reference to Goebbels,not a comparison. [49]
Anti-Semitism dispute
In January 2022,Gopal tweeted that historian David Abulafia's description of fellow historian David Olusoga as 'eloquent' could sound dismissive,particularly when pertaining to writers of colour. [54] [55] Abulafia told Varsity that he thought it was "insulting or possibly libellous" to infer that his remark had a racist overtone. [55]
Gopal claimed that the news editor of Varsity concocted the story about her supposed charge of 'racism' against Abulafia,claiming she had become a target because she had criticised the IHRA definition of anti-Semitism. [56] She said that the news editor was among those who lobbied to adopt the definition in full. [56] [57] She also said that one student journalist behind the story had "quite powerful familial connections to the liberal media",and that the criticism of her in the student newspaper Varsity was not "quite the little campus story ... that it is supposed to be". [57] [58]
The Cambridge University Jewish Society and Abulafia,noting that Abulafia and the students were Jewish,condemned Gopal's remarks as evoking anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. [58] [59] Gopal released a statement saying that Varsity had "published misleading and false claims" about her words that had subjected her to "a concerted racist and misogynist attack across the British right-wing press." [60]
