Revised Joint Ministerial Decrees on Construction of Houses of Worship

Last updated

On 21 March 2006, the Indonesian Ministers of Religious Affairs and Home Affairs issued a decree that is commonly referred to as the Joint Decree on Houses of Worship. The decree issued as Ministry of Religious Affairs decree No. 9 of 2006 and Ministry of Home Affairs decree No. 8 of 2006. [1] [2] A translation of the full title is "Regulation of Duties of Regional Head and Deputy in Maintaining Religious Harmony, Empowering the Forum of Religious Harmony, and Constructing Places of Worship".

Contents

Background

The decree is a revision of a joint decree [3] issued in 1969 by the Indonesian Home Affairs Minister and Religious Affairs Minister and which covers building houses of prayer. In 1967-1969, churches were attacked, sometimes destroyed, on Sumatra, Sulawesi, and Java. These violent episodes appeared to have been triggered by construction of buildings for religious minorities. In response, on 13 September 1969, the Ministers of Religion and Home Affairs issued Joint Ministerial Decree 1/1969 to control construction of places of worship and to govern religious practices in general. [4] [5]

Requirements

According to Article 14 of the 2006 decree, a permit for constructing a house of worship should issue when the applicant obtains:

Article 14 requires local governments to find an alternative or temporary venue for services if the group cannot meet one of the requirements. Article 21 requires that local governments fairly mediate disputes. [7] [8] [9]

Concerns

While the government of Indonesia asserted that the purpose of the 2006 decree was to reduce inter-faith conflict, many persons and organizations assert that the decree is unconstitutional, [7] [10] is contrary to treaties ratified by Indonesia, and has increased inter-faith conflict and the ability of a region's majority faith to suppress other faiths. [2] [11] [12] [13] Others note that the decree's requirements create opportunities for corruption. [14]

Specific concerns raised regarding the 2006 decree include:

  1. Aggressive religious organizations apply pressure on and pay locals to not sign or rescind signatures of petitions.
  2. The FKUB is not an elected body and is dominated by the local majority religion. Where such majority practitioners are intolerant of other religions, the FKUB effectively vetoes construction of minority religious buildings. [10] [15]
  3. Aggressive religious organizations apply pressure on regional entities to not provide recommendations or approve permits for which applicants have otherwise qualified. [15]
  4. Even if all requirements are met, certain officials have stated that they will not issue permits if any local objections remain.
  5. Even if the permit is issued, vociferous responses from militant groups have caused local officials to rescind permits or to not protect the applicant's ability to construct or use the building.
  6. After using FKUB or political influence to prevent issuance of a permit, extremist groups use failure to obtain a permit as a pretext for attacking the applicant congregation when it attempts to meet at the site or elsewhere.

On the other hand, some (including minority religious organizations) have suggested that the 2006 decree is better than nothing. Such organizations note that the decree provides a minority religious organization with at least a legal argument that it is entitled to a permit. [15] Such commentators suggest that the decree would be acceptable if implemented in a consistent and expedited manner, with charges of "disturbance of public order" applied to opposing vigilantes rather than applicants. Further, certain regions appear to be encountering less inter-faith strife than others. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

Interfaith dialogue Positive interaction of different religious people

Interfaith dialogue refers to cooperative, constructive, and positive interaction between people of different religious traditions and/or spiritual or humanistic beliefs, at both the individual and institutional levels. It is distinct from syncretism or alternative religion, in that dialogue often involves promoting understanding between different religions or beliefs to increase acceptance of others, rather than to synthesize new beliefs.

Christianity in Indonesia

Christianity is Indonesia's second-largest religion, after Islam. Indonesia also has the second-largest Christian population in Southeast Asia after the Philippines, the largest Protestant population in Southeast Asia, and the fourth-largest Christian population in Asia after the Philippines, China and India. Indonesia's 28.6 million Christians constitute 10.72% of the country's population in 2018, with 7.60% Protestant (20.25 million) and 3.12% Catholic (8.33 million). Some provinces in Indonesia are majority Christian.

The Constitution of Kazakhstan provides for freedom of religion, and the various religious communities worship largely without government interference. Local officials attempt on occasion to limit the practice of religion by some nontraditional groups; however, higher-level officials or courts occasionally intervene to correct such attempts.

There was no substantial change in the degree of religious tolerance by the Turkmenistan government during the period covered by this report, and there were troubling developments in the treatment of some unregistered groups. Following a sharp decrease in harassment of both registered and unregistered groups in late 2006, mistreatment of some registered and many unregistered religious minority group members, similar to that in previous reporting periods, resumed in February 2007. On December 21, 2006, President Saparmurat Niyazov died. The State Security Council appointed Deputy Chairman of the Cabinet of Ministers and Minister of Health Gurbanguly Berdimuhammedov Acting President; Berdimuhammedov was elected President in February, 2007. During the reporting period there were no indications the Turkmenistan government planned to rescind or modify previous policies regarding religious freedom. The Turkmenistan government threatened members of minority religious groups with fines, loss of employment and housing, and imprisonment because of their beliefs.

The Constitution provides for freedom of religion, and the government generally respected this right in practice. Buddhism is the state religion. There was no change in the status of respect for religious freedom by the government during the period covered by this report, and government policy continued to contribute to the generally free practice of religion. There were limited reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice.

Freedom of religion in Taiwan is provided for by the Constitution of the Republic of China, which is in force on Taiwan. Taiwan's progressive government generally respects freedom of religion in practice, with policies which contribute to the generally free practice of religion. Taiwan's strong human rights protections, lack of state-sanctioned discrimination, and generally high regard for freedom of religion or belief earned it a joint #1 ranking alongside The Netherlands and Belgium in the 2018 Freedom of Thought Report. Freedom House also gave Taiwan the top score for religious freedoms in 2018. Possibly the only coercion to practice a certain faith in Taiwan comes from within the family, where the choice to adopt a non-traditional faith can sometimes lead to ostracism "because they stop performing ancestor worship rites and rituals."

The Indonesian constitution provides for freedom of religion. The government generally respects religious freedom for the six officially recognized religions: Islam, Protestantism, Catholicism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Confucianism. However, ongoing restrictions, particularly on religions not sanctioned by the government and sects of the recognized religions considered deviant, are exceptions. Questioning any of the six above can lead to five years in prison for "insulting a major religion" and six more years if the Internet is used.

The Constitution of Laos provides for freedom of religion; however, the Government restricted this right in practice. Some government officials committed abuses of citizens' religious freedom.

Freedom of religion in Singapore is guaranteed under the Constitution. However, the Government of Singapore restricts this right in some circumstances. The Government has restricted the Jehovah's Witnesses and banned the Unification Church. The Government does not tolerate speech or actions that it deems could adversely affect racial or religious harmony.

Vietnam is widely known for its tolerance towards religion. The Constitution of Vietnam officially provides for freedom of worship, while the government has imposed a range of legislation restricting religious practices.

The Constitution of Bahrain states that Islam is the official religion and that Shari'a is a principal source for legislation. Article 22 of the Constitution provides for freedom of conscience, the inviolability of worship, and the freedom to perform religious rites and hold religious parades and meetings, in accordance with the customs observed in the country; however, the Government placed some limitations on the exercise of this right.

The Constitution provides for the freedom to practice the rights of one's religion and faith in accordance with the customs that are observed in the kingdom, unless they violate public order or morality. The state religion is Islam. The Government prohibits conversion from Islam and proselytization of Muslims.

The Basic Law, in accordance with tradition, declares that Islam is the state religion and that Shari'a is the source of legislation. It also prohibits discrimination based on religion and provides for the freedom to practice religious rites as long as doing so does not disrupt public order. The Government generally respected this right, but within defined parameters that placed limitations on the right in practice. While the Government continued to protect the free practice of religion in general, it formalized previously unwritten prohibitions on religious gatherings in locations other than government-approved houses of worship, and on non-Islamic institutions issuing publications within their communities, without prior approval from the Ministry of Endowments and Religious Affairs (MERA). There were no reports of societal abuses or discrimination based on religious belief or practice.

Azerbaijan is a multicultural and multi-religious country and a secular country. The article 48 of The Constitution of Azerbaijan states that the right to liberty and the right of people of all faiths may choose and practice their religion without restriction is ensured. Article 18 of the Constitution of Azerbaijan states that religion acts separately from the state affairs and the government. People of all beliefs are equal before the law and the propaganda of any religion, including Islam, while majority of the population is Muslim, is still prohibited strictly as a case of contradicting humanism.

In Russia, freedom of religion is in principle a guaranteed right under the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The prominence and authority of various religious groups is closely tied to the country's political situation. In the 10th century, Prince Vladimir I, who was converted by missionaries from Byzantium, embraced Christianity as the official Russian religion. For approximately 1,000 years thereafter, Russian Orthodoxy became the country's primary denomination.

Blasphemy law in Indonesia is the legislation, presidential decrees, and ministerial directives that prohibit blasphemy in Indonesia.

Ahmadiyya in Indonesia

Ahmadiyya is an Islamic movement in Indonesia. The earliest history of the Community in Indonesia dates back to the early days of the Second Caliph, when during the summer of 1925, roughly two decades prior to the Indonesian revolution, a missionary of the Community, Rahmat Ali, stepped on Indonesia's largest island, Sumatra, and established the movement with 13 devotees in Tapaktuan, in the province of Aceh. The Community has an influential history in Indonesia's religious development, yet in the modern times it has faced increasing intolerance from religious establishments in the country and physical hostilities from radical Muslim groups. The Association of Religion Data Archives estimates around 400,000 Ahmadi Muslims, spread over 542 branches across the country.

Islamic Defenders Front

The Islamic Defenders Front is an Indonesian hardline Islamist organization formed in 1998. It was founded by Muhammad Rizieq Shihab with backing from the military and political figures at the time. The organization's leader is Ahmad Shabri Lubis, who was inaugurated in 2015, and Rizieq Shihab remains acting as the adviser with the title Great Imam of the FPI for life.

The status of religious freedom in Africa varies from country to country. States can differ based on whether or not they guarantee equal treatment under law for followers of different religions, whether they establish a state religion, the extent to which religious organizations operating within the country are policed, and the extent to which religious law is used as a basis for the country's legal code.

The status of religious freedom in Asia varies from country to country. States can differ based on whether or not they guarantee equal treatment under law for followers of different religions, whether they establish a state religion, the extent to which religious organizations operating within the country are policed, and the extent to which religious law is used as a basis for the country's legal code.

References

  1. ↑ Ropi, Ismatu (1 January 2007), "Regulating worship", Inside Indonesia, no. 89, pp. 7–8, retrieved 3 September 2011
  2. 1 2 "Research Response IDN31419 (Indonesia)" (PDF). Country Advice. Sidney, NSW: Refugee Review Tribunal. 9 March 2007. pp. 5–. Retrieved 13 October 2011.
  3. ↑ Surat Keputusan Bersama Menag dan Mendagri Nomor 1/1969. Also referred to as "Joint Decree of the Minister of Religious Affairs and the Minister of Home Affairs No.1/BER/MDN-MAD/1969 concerning the Implementation of the Task of Government Officials to Ensure the Order and Undisturbed Implementation of the Religious Development and Practices by its Adherents".
  4. ↑ Crouch, Melissa (2010). Peter A, Jackson (ed.). "Implementing the Regulation on Places of Worship in Indonesia: New Problems, Local Politics and Court Action". Asian Studies Review. 34 (4): 403–419. doi:10.1080/10357823.2010.527921. ISSN   1467-8403.
  5. ↑ USCIRF Annual Report 2009 - The Commission's Watch List: Indonesia, United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, 1 May 2009, retrieved 14 October 2011, Local government officials also have sought to mediate between militant groups and religious minorities in some cases, but sometimes acquiesce to pressure from militants and revoke permits for longstanding places of worship or allow the destruction of religious venues operating without permits. In response to persistent criticism from religious minorities and international observers over the number of religious venues closed or destroyed in Indonesia, the Ministry of Religion issued Joint Ministerial Decree 1/2006 to replace a previous, vaguely-worded decree that required religious groups to gain "community approval" before they could expand, renovate, or open new religious venues.
  6. ↑ Joint Forum for Religious Tolerance or Forum Kerukunan Umat Beragama in Indonesian
  7. 1 2 Ridwan Max Sijabat (15 September 2010). "Govt told to revoke decree on houses of worship". The Jakarta Post. Includes translated portions of Articles 13, 14, and 21.
  8. ↑ "Indonesia". 2006 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. 6 March 2007. Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including: c. Freedom of Religion. Retrieved 8 October 2011. On March 21, the ministers of religious affairs and home affairs signed a joint ministerial decree on the establishment of houses of worship, which replaced a 1969 joint ministerial decree, and declares that a permit for a house of worship can be issued if it is petitioned in a signed statement by at least 90 congregation members and 60 other community members. The petition must then be approved by both the local head of the Religious Affairs Department and the local office of the Communication Forum for Religious Harmony. The joint ministerial decree was in part a response to attacks on unregistered houses of worship. The decree was intended to make it easier to open houses of worship by reducing the number of other community members who must sign the petition. Some groups criticized the new rules for retaining the requirement that community members consent to establishment of houses of worship. These groups also noted that the high number of congregation members required to sign the petition limited the ability of small congregations to register and to exercise their constitutional right to freedom of worship.
  9. ↑ USCIRF Annual Report 2009 - The Commission's Watch List: Indonesia, United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, 1 May 2009, retrieved 14 October 2011, Decree 1/2006 requires a religious group with a membership of more than 90 persons to obtain the support of 60 local residents for any plans to build or expand a religious venue. That petition must then be sent to the Joint Forum for Religious Tolerance (FKUB), a provincial panel of religious leaders chosen proportionally by the number of religious adherents in the province. If there remains strong community opposition to the religious venue, the FKUB can find an alternative location.
  10. 1 2 Mengenali Lokus Diskriminasi dalam PBM Dua Menteri [Recognizing Locus of Discrimination in the Joint Ministerial Regulation](PDF), Bendungan Hilir, Indonesia: SETARA Institute, 23 September 2010, p. 6, retrieved 13 October 2011, The Joint Ministerial Decrees are flawed constitutionally since they are contrary to the guarantees of the freedom enshrined in the Indonesian Constitution. In addition to discriminative provisions the Decrees have, the existence of the Joint Ministerial Decrees also reduce the norms stipulated in the Constitution.
  11. ↑ Pasandaran, Camelia (5 October 2010). "Controversial Decree on Indonesian Houses of Worship to Become Law: Ministers". The Jakarta Globe. Despite intense public criticism of a 2006 joint ministerial decree requiring neighbors' approval for houses of worship, ministers on Monday said the government planned to make it a law. * * * The decree, issued by the ministries of religious affairs and home affairs, requires a religious group to obtain the approval of at least 60 households in the immediate vicinity before building a house of worship. It has been criticized for making it almost impossible for minority faiths to build houses of worship in the world's largest Muslim-majority nation. * * * Calls to amend the decree resurfaced following recent mob violence against several protestant churches and their congregations in several areas of West Java, including Bekasi, Karawang and Bogor.
  12. ↑ USCIRF Annual Report 2009 - The Commission's Watch List: Indonesia, United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, 1 May 2009, retrieved 14 October 2011, At the time, critics of the decree claimed that it was designed to stop the proliferation of "house churches" and small Hindu temples (of fewer than 90 members). Prominent Muslim religious leaders have stated publicly that the new decree might violate Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Overall, the number of church, temple, and mosque closures has declined slightly since Joint Ministerial Decree 1/2006 was issued. In addition, over the past year, the Ministry of Religion has made efforts to establish provincial FKUB panels. Former President Abdurrahman Wahid has commended the "sincere efforts" of FKUB panels to promote religious tolerance, but added that without sufficient "control, evaluation, monitoring ... and sanctions" the panels can be "used to promote the interests of the majority religion." Indeed, despite the existence of FKUB panels, Hindu and Christian groups report that they are sometimes refused building permits even though they have accumulated the necessary signatures. For example, five Protestant churches in North Bekasi, Jabotabek region, East Jakarta continue to face vandalism and sporadic protests from the group Musholla (Cooperating Bureau of Mosques and Praying Rooms) because they meet in private homes. Although police continue to protect the worship activities of these groups, local officials have refused to grant them permission to build permanent structures, despite their having met the criteria established in the 2006 decree. A similar situation occurred in South Rawa Badak, Koja region, North Jakarta in August 2008, when local officials pressured the pastor of a Protestant church to cease worship activities, despite his having received permission from the FKUB to operate the church.
  13. ↑ Saraswati, Muninggar Sri (29 March 2006). "Group goes to court against places of worship decree". The Jakarta Post. Jakarta, Indonesia. Retrieved 22 October 2011. Minority groups of Christians and Muslims are seeking judicial review of the new decree on houses of worship that they say will obstruct them from practicing their faiths. The request was submitted Tuesday to the Supreme Court by the Defense Team for Religious and Faith Freedom (TPKB), a group of lawyers of different faiths. 'We want it annulled. The decree is against the Constitution, the Human Rights Law and the principles of freedom to exercise one's religion and faith,' group leader Saor Siagian said after filing the appeal.
  14. ↑ "Ministerial decree on houses of worship used for extortion". The Jakarta Post. 18 September 2010. Chairman of the Bekasi Indonesian Communion of Churches (PGI Bekasi) Soaduon Napitupulu said 'everyone wants their share. The interfaith forum members, the city administration officials, not to mention thugs, and even some members of the community,' he told The Jakarta Post Friday.
  15. 1 2 3 Indonesia: "Christianisation" and Intolerance -- Asia Briefing No.114 (PDF), Brussels: International Crisis Group, 4 November 2010, pp. 9–12, retrieved 14 October 2011, The refusal of local residents to support the congregation led many in HKBP, rights groups and others to say that the 2006 joint ministerial regulation was discriminatory, violated the right to religious freedom and should be revoked. Believers should be able to worship where they pleased, they argued, and proportional representation on the religious harmony forums ensured that the majority could always block minorities.
  16. ↑ "Papuans build interreligious harmony". Interfaith News. Regional Interfaith Network. 14 February 2011. Minority religions in the Mimika district of Indonesian Papua say they have never encountered difficulties in building worship places in the predominantly Protestant province. Muhammad Amin, chairman of the local Indonesian Ulema Council, told ucanews.com that the local government in the district facilitated the building of places of worship including churches, mosques and temples. "We maintain interreligious relations and religious leaders have ensured that their followers have a good understanding of other religions," the Muslim scholar said. Although Protestants are the largest religious community in Papua, they have never discriminated against Muslim and other religious communities, he continued. "Even if there was a problem, they could resolve it through interreligious dialogue," he added. According to Amin, interreligious conflicts in other regions of Indonesia are the result of a lack of religious understanding. "Such conflicts only cause losses," he said, expressing the hope that tensions will not arise among people in the district. Referring to a 2006 joint ministerial decree on the building of worship venues, Amin noted that the decree helps to maintain good interreligious relations. It should not be revised, replaced or revoked, he stated. Piter Rada, who heads the district's office of religious affairs, agreed. "Thank God that there were no religious conflicts triggered by the building of worship venues," he said. Meanwhile, Sacred Heart of Jesus Father Bernardus Kedang of St. Peter's Church in Karang Senang lauded religious leaders who have encouraged their followers to maintain harmony and tolerance. However, he suggested that the joint ministerial decree should be reviewed to ensure that religious conflicts will not recur in other parts of the country.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.