Rivalry

Last updated

Tweedledum and Tweedledee, fictional rivals from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass. Tennieldumdee.jpg
Tweedledum and Tweedledee, fictional rivals from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking-Glass .

A rivalry is the state of two people or groups engaging in a lasting competitive relationship. Rivalry is the "against each other" spirit between two competing sides. The relationship itself may also be called "a rivalry", and each participant or side a rival to the other. Someone's main rival may be called an archrival. A rivalry can be defined as "a perceptual categorizing process in which actors identify which states are sufficiently threatening competitors". [2] In order for the rivalry to persist, rather than resulting in perpetual dominance by one side, it must be "a competitive relationship among equals". [3] Political scientist John A. Vasquez has asserted that equality of power is a necessary component for a true rivalry to exist, but others have disputed that element. [4]

Contents

Rivalries traverse many different fields within society and "abound at all levels of human interaction", [5] often existing between friends, firms, sports teams, schools, and universities. Moreover, "families, politicians, political parties, ethnic groups, regional sections of countries, and states all engage in enduring rivalries of varying length and intensity". [5] Rivalries develop from the product of competition and ritualism between different parties. In some cases, rivalry can become "so consuming that actors worry only about whether their actions will harm or benefit their rivals". [5]

Origin and meaning

Rivalry between France and Germany has existed as long as the two nations states have; here, officers from the Prussian Gardes du Corps, wishing to provoke war, sharpen their swords on the steps of the French embassy in Berlin in the autumn of 1806. Myrbach-Prussian Garde du Corps.jpg
Rivalry between France and Germany has existed as long as the two nations states have; here, officers from the Prussian Gardes du Corps, wishing to provoke war, sharpen their swords on the steps of the French embassy in Berlin in the autumn of 1806.

A rivalry generally refers to competition between people or groups, where each strives to be more successful than the other. [6] [lower-alpha 1] Alternatively, and especially when used in the verb form (rivaled and rivaling in American English, and rivalled and rivalling in British English) it may indicate a relationship of equality, as in "the rival of their peers," "a person without rival," or an "unrivaled performance". [6] The origin of the root rival comes from the Middle French and Latin rivalis, and the French rivus, meaning a person who drinks from or utilizes the same brook or stream as another. [8] : 404  [9] : 400  The word likely entered the English language around 1577, and appeared in the writings of William Shakespeare as early as 1623, in Two Gentlemen of Verona . [10] [lower-alpha 2]

In his 1902 Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, James Mark Baldwin defined three main types of rivalry:

  1. biological rivalry,
  2. personal or conscious rivalry,
  3. commercial and industrial rivalry [11]

Alternatively, Kilduff and colleagues in their 2010 review, instead divided among three types of competition (individual, group, and organization), and distinguished rivalry specifically as a "subjective competitive relationship" which necessarily entails "increased psychological involvement and perceived stakes". [7] More modern research has also identified similarity, proximity, and history of competition as necessary antecedents for the establishment of a rivalry, while others have suggested that incivility may reduce the need for a history of competition to solidify the rival relationship. [12]

Archrival

Where a person or entity has multiple rivals, the most significant one may be called an archrival. [13] In fiction, it is common for a recurring heroic character to have an archrival or archenemy to serve as a foil to the hero. However, an archrival may also be distinguished from a nemesis, with the latter being an enemy whom the hero cannot defeat (or who defeats the hero), even while not being a longstanding or consistent enemy to the hero. [14]

Friendly rivalries

A rivalry in which competitors remain at odds over specific issues or outcomes, but otherwise maintain civil relations, can be called a friendly rivalry. Institutions such as universities often maintain friendly rivalries, with the idea that "[a] friendly rivalry encourages an institution to bring to the fore the very best it has to offer, knowing that if it is deficient, others will supersede it". [15] In some instances, institutions such as corporations, sports leagues, or military units, may encourage friendly rivalries between subsets within that institution. [16] [17] For example, in the 1870s, the British Army held a sports competition in which individual military units selected members to compete against those selected by other units, for the purpose of engendering friendly rivalries between the units to promote internal cohesion. [17] Such rivalries may also be encouraged in order to prompt individual members of those subsets to compete more productively.

Interservice rivalries can occur between different branches of a country's armed forces, arising from the competition for limited resources among a nation's land, naval, and air forces. [18] The term also applies to the rivalries between a country's intelligence services (e.g. CIA and FBI in the United States), or between the police and fire services of a city, such as the NYPD and FDNY. [19]

Rivalry in specific fields

Interpersonal relationships

A variety of rivalries occur in interpersonal relationships.

Sibling rivalry is a type of competition or animosity among siblings, whether blood related or not. Siblings generally spend more time together during childhood than they do with parents. The sibling bond is often complicated and is influenced by factors such as parental treatment, birth order, personality, and people and experiences outside the family. [20] Sibling rivalry is particularly intense when children are very close in age and/or of the same gender and/or where one or both children are intellectually gifted. [21] [ self-published source ] According to a review by Macionis, older siblings tend to report rivalry peaking in childhood, while younger siblings report a peak later during early adolescence.[ citation needed ]

Rivalries also occur between people who have competing romantic interests in the same potential romantic partner:

The jealousy mechanism is activated if a committed romantic relationship is threatened by a rival. ... In heterosexual relationships, the rival is an individual of the opposite sex; in homosexual relationships, the rival is of the same sex. The rival can be imagined, suspected, or real. The minimal requirement for an individual to be perceived as a rival is fulfilled if the partner is assumed to be attracted to this other person and if this attraction is considered sufficient to eventually result in the partner's infidelity. It is less clear whether someone should be considered a rival who is attracted to the partner when the partner does not return this attraction, as in this case a partner's infidelity appears rather unlikely. [22]

People employ a number of mechanisms to counter romantic rivals, such as discrediting the characteristics of the rival that the romantic partner might seek in a long-term relationship. [23]

Winston Churchill and Neville Chamberlain were political rivals for the leadership of the UK for much of the 1930s as the Second World War loomed. Churchill and Chamberlain.jpg
Winston Churchill and Neville Chamberlain were political rivals for the leadership of the UK for much of the 1930s as the Second World War loomed.

Economics and politics

In economics, both goods and producers of goods are said to be rivals. A good is said to be rivalrous if its consumption by one consumer prevents simultaneous consumption by other consumers. [24] Companies that compete to sell the same goods can become rivals as each seeks to convince consumers to purchase its products, to the exclusion of the products of its rival:

The competition of commercial rivals... centers on mutual exclusion from important markets, or the threat thereof. If a commercial rival continues to gain, there is some likelihood that its closest competitor will be excluded altogether from the market in question, or else reduced to a marginal position there. It is not inconceivable that some commercial rivalries transform into strategic rivalries. [5]

The rivalry between Millwall F.C. and West Ham United F.C. is one of the oldest and bitterest in the history of English football. West Ham United and Millwall programme 1930.jpg
The rivalry between Millwall F.C. and West Ham United F.C. is one of the oldest and bitterest in the history of English football.
The rivalry between Celtic F.C. and Rangers F.C., both Glasgow teams, is based on the ethno-political sectarianism of The Troubles. Glasgow Derby.JPG
The rivalry between Celtic F.C. and Rangers F.C., both Glasgow teams, is based on the ethno-political sectarianism of The Troubles.

In the study of international relations, rivalries between nation states may be highly formalized or comparatively informal. Shohov and colleagues cite Soviet Union-United States relations during the Cold War as one example of a formalized rivalry, "with its period summits and arms-control negotiations". In either case, the formulation of the rivalry carries with it its own expectation of appropriate behaviors among the participants, which works to sustain the relationship, and limit the avenues available to those who would work to undo it. [25] : 161  Rivalries between nations can induce them to compete "over naval armaments, foreign aid, cultural influence, and athletic events", the rivalry in each case occurring within the context of the competitors having "labeled one or more of their adversaries as worthy of particular concern and attention". [5] It has been noted that "while all great powers, almost by definition, are competitors, only some brand each other as rivals", with rivals being "competitors who have been singled out for special attention in some way": [5]

Presumably, there is something unusual about their competitiveness. In most cases, the special significance can be attributed to a perception of acute threat to important values and interests. [5]

Sports

Sports rivalries are often closely connected with the ritualism associated with sports. Ritualism is "a series of ... iterated acts or performances that are ... famous in terms 'not entirely encoded by the performer'; that is, they are imbued by meanings external to the performer". [26] Everyone who is part of a sports event in some capacity becomes a part of the ritualism associated with sports. Teams get together before the game to warm-up, coaches shake hands with each other, captains have a determiner of who gets the ball first, everyone stands during the national anthem, the fans sit in specific areas, make certain gestures with their hands throughout the game, wearing specific gear that is associated with the team, and have the same post-game practices, every game of every season of every year. [27] : 72  It is through this consistency of playing the same teams yearly that "these rivalries have shown remarkable staying power". [27] : 49–50  Specifically, it is society's drive to disrupt these original rituals that start rivalries. Horst Helle says, "society needs a particular quantitative relationship of harmony and disharmony, association and competition, favour and disfavour, in order to take shape in a specific way". [26] Society is drawn to this in sports because this is a principal characteristic in everyday life, which can be seen in historic religious rivalries, such as the contemporary example of sectarianism in Glasgow. Within an area, differences between two types of people can drive the start of a rivalry. Competition and support keep the rivalry going.

In sports, competition tests who has better skill and ability at the time of the game through play. Many rivalries persist because the competition is between two teams that have similar abilities. Spectators gravitate towards competitive rivalries because they are interesting to watch and unpredictable. Society follows competitions because competitions influence "the unity of society". Being loyal to one team in a rivalry brings a sense of belonging to a community of supporters that are hoping that the team they are rooting for wins. The fans of the two different teams do not sit next to each other because this disrupts the community. In a similar way, competition displays an indirect way of fighting. [28] Society does not condone direct fighting as a way of getting something so this is the most passive-aggressive way of fighting. Because this is an acceptable practice, there are many supporters of competition as they fuel a way for the people to participate in a rivalry without the consequences of fighting. However, when the competition is not enough in sports and the tensions are high fighting may ensue. [28]

A sports writer[ who? ] codified the essentials of a sports rivalry in the United States. To be termed a rivalry, the competition requires

  1. True hatred on both sides; not just an inferiority complex from one group of supporters.
  2. Proximity – the closer, the better.
  3. Each team needs to have a winning season. Otherwise the team with the most wins can't take the other team seriously.
  4. A "history." Short term rivalries seem irrelevant.
  5. Not essential, but important for the "hate" factor is national significance (for college teams). Otherwise, no one else may care. [29]

Effects

Rivalries may increase motivation, lead to greater effort, and better performance. [30] [31] They may also contribute to greater risk taking behavior among participants, and increase a propensity for unethical behavior. [12] [32] [33] [34] [ needs update ]

These differences may lead to poor decision making on the part of groups and individuals that may not otherwise take place in the absence of a rivalry. Examples examined in the literature include the 1994 attacks by figure skater Tonya Harding against her rival Nancy Kerrigan, the admission in court by British Airways that they had engaged in a number of unethical practices against their business rival Virgin Atlantic (including stealing confidential data and spreading rumors about CEO Richard Branson), and the overpayment of Boston Scientific in their acquisition (called the "second worst" ever) of Guidant, due to the fact that they were bidding against their rival company Johnson & Johnson. [7] [34] [ needs update ] At the extreme, competition between rivals "possesses some likelihood of escalation to physical damage". [5]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ At least one source contended that although commonly two-sided, a rivalry may exist as perceived by only one side of a conflict, without the requirement that the feeling be reciprocal. [7]
  2. ↑ Although superficially similar to the word river, the two do not share an origin, with river instead being derived from the Latin ripa for "bank" or "shore". [10]

Related Research Articles

Deception is the act of convincing one or many recipients of untrue information. The person creating the deception knows it to be false while the receiver of the message has a tendency to believe it. It is often done for personal gain or advantage. Deception can involve dissimulation, propaganda and sleight of hand as well as distraction, camouflage or concealment. There is also self-deception. It can also be called, with varying subjective implications, beguilement, deceit, bluff, mystification, ruse, or subterfuge.

In social psychology, an interpersonal relation describes a social association, connection, or affiliation between two or more persons. It overlaps significantly with the concept of social relations, which are the fundamental unit of analysis within the social sciences. Relations vary in degrees of intimacy, self-disclosure, duration, reciprocity, and power distribution. The main themes or trends of the interpersonal relations are: family, kinship, friendship, love, marriage, business, employment, clubs, neighborhoods, ethical values, support and solidarity. Interpersonal relations may be regulated by law, custom, or mutual agreement, and form the basis of social groups and societies. They appear when people communicate or act with each other within specific social contexts, and they thrive on equitable and reciprocal compromises.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jealousy</span> Emotion

Jealousy generally refers to the thoughts or feelings of insecurity, fear, and concern over a relative lack of possessions or safety.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Competition</span> Rivalry where multiple parties strive for a goal which cannot be shared

Competition is a rivalry where two or more parties strive for a common goal which cannot be shared: where one's gain is the other's loss. Competition can arise between entities such as organisms, individuals, economic and social groups, etc. The rivalry can be over attainment of any exclusive goal, including recognition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Romance (love)</span> Type of love that focuses on feelings

Romance or romantic love is a feeling of love for, or a strong attraction towards another person, and the courtship behaviors undertaken by an individual to express those overall feelings and resultant emotions.

Rapport is a close and harmonious relationship in which the people or groups concerned are "in sync" with each other, understand each other's feelings or ideas, and communicate smoothly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sibling</span> One of two or more individuals having at least one parent in common

A sibling is a relative that shares at least one parent with the other person. A male sibling is a brother, and a female sibling is a sister. A person with no siblings is an only child.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">University and college rivalry</span> Ongoing competitiveness between two institutions

Pairs of schools, colleges and universities, especially when they are close to each other either geographically or in their areas of specialization, often establish a university or college rivalry with each other over the years. This sports rivalry can extend to both academics and athletics, and sometimes even politics, the middle being typically better known to the general public. These schools place an added emphasis on emerging victorious in any event that includes their rival. This may include the creation of a special trophy or other commemoration of the event. While many of these rivalries have arisen spontaneously, some have been created by college officials in efforts to sell more tickets and support their programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intimate relationship</span> Physical or emotional intimacy

An intimate relationship is an interpersonal relationship that involves emotional or physical closeness between people and may include sexual intimacy and feelings of romance or love. Intimate relationships are interdependent, and the members of the relationship mutually influence each other. The quality and nature of the relationship depends on the interactions between individuals, and is derived from the unique context and history that builds between people over time. Social and legal institutions such as marriage acknowledge and uphold intimate relationships between people. However, intimate relationships are not necessarily monogamous or sexual, and there is wide social and cultural variability in the norms and practices of intimacy between people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-monogamy</span> Intimate relationship that is not strictly monogamous

Non-monogamy is an umbrella term for every practice or philosophy of non-dyadic intimate relationship that does not strictly hew to the standards of monogamy, particularly that of having only one person with whom to exchange sex, love, and/or affection. In that sense, "nonmonogamy" may be accurately applied to extramarital sex, group marriage, or polyamory. It is not synonymous with infidelity, since all parties are consenting to the relationship structure, partners are often committed to each other as well as to their other partners and cheating is still considered problematic behavior with many non-monogamous relationships.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Betrayal</span> Breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust, or confidence

Betrayal is the breaking or violation of a presumptive contract, trust, or confidence that produces moral and psychological conflict within a relationship amongst individuals, between organizations or between individuals and organizations. Often betrayal is the act of supporting a rival group, or it is a complete break from previously decided upon or presumed norms by one party from the others. Someone who betrays others is commonly known as a traitor or betrayer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trash talk</span> Form of boast or insult commonly heard in competitive situations

Trash talk is a form of spoken insult usually found in sports events, although it is not exclusive to sports or similarly characterized events. It is often used to intimidate the opposition and/or make them less confident in their abilities to win easier, but it can also be used in a humorous spirit. Trash-talk is often characterized by the use of hyperbole or figurative language, such as "Your team can't run! You run like honey on ice!" Puns and other wordplay are commonly used.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sibling rivalry</span> Type of competition or animosity among siblings

Sibling rivalry is a type of competition or animosity among siblings, whether blood-related or not.

In psychology, the theory of attachment can be applied to adult relationships including friendships, emotional affairs, adult romantic and carnal relationships and, in some cases, relationships with inanimate objects. Attachment theory, initially studied in the 1960s and 1970s primarily in the context of children and parents, was extended to adult relationships in the late 1980s. The working models of children found in Bowlby's attachment theory form a pattern of interaction that is likely to continue influencing adult relationships.

The following outline is provided as an overview of and topical guide to interpersonal relationships.

Mind games are actions performed for reasons of psychological one-upmanship, often employing passive–aggressive behavior to specifically demoralize or dis-empower the thinking subject, making the aggressor look superior. It also describes the unconscious games played by people engaged in ulterior transactions of which they are not fully aware, and which transactional analysis considers to form a central element of social life all over the world.

"Frenemy" is a portmanteau of "friend" and "enemy" that refers to "a person with whom one is friendly, despite a fundamental dislike or rivalry" or "a person who combines the characteristics of a friend and an enemy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual selection in humans</span> Evolutionary effects of sexual selection on humans

Sexual selection in humans concerns the concept of sexual selection, introduced by Charles Darwin as an element of his theory of natural selection, as it affects humans. Sexual selection is a biological way one sex chooses a mate for the best reproductive success. Most compete with others of the same sex for the best mate to contribute their genome for future generations. This has shaped human evolution for many years, but reasons why humans choose their mates are not fully understood. Sexual selection is quite different in non-human animals than humans as they feel more of the evolutionary pressures to reproduce and can easily reject a mate. The role of sexual selection in human evolution has not been firmly established although neoteny has been cited as being caused by human sexual selection. It has been suggested that sexual selection played a part in the evolution of the anatomically modern human brain, i.e. the structures responsible for social intelligence underwent positive selection as a sexual ornamentation to be used in courtship rather than for survival itself, and that it has developed in ways outlined by Ronald Fisher in the Fisherian runaway model. Fisher also stated that the development of sexual selection was "more favourable" in humans.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sibling relationship</span> Relationship between siblings

Siblings play a unique role in one another's lives that simulates the companionship of parents as well as the influence and assistance of friends. Because siblings often grow up in the same household, they have a large amount of exposure to one another, like other members of the immediate family. However, though a sibling relationship can have both hierarchical and reciprocal elements, this relationship tends to be more egalitarian and symmetrical than with family members of other generations. Furthermore, sibling relationships often reflect the overall condition of cohesiveness within a family.

Female intrasexual competition is competition between women over a potential mate. Such competition might include self-promotion, derogation of other women, and direct and indirect aggression toward other women. Factors that influence female intrasexual competition include the genetic quality of available mates, hormone levels, and interpersonal dynamics.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Richardson, Kay; Parry, Katy; Corner, John (January 1, 2013). Political Culture and Media Genre: Beyond the News. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 113. ISBN   9780230354098.
  2. ↑ Thompson, William R. (2001). "Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics". International Studies Quarterly. 45 (4): 557–586. doi: 10.1111/0020-8833.00214 .
  3. ↑ Michael Brecher (May 26, 2016). The world of protracted conflicts. Lanham, Maryland. p. 11. ISBN   978-1-4985-3188-7. OCLC   1253439132.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link); citing Gary Goertz; Paul F. Diehl (June 1993). "Enduring Rivalries: Theoretical Constructs and Empirical Patterns". International Studies Quarterly. Vol. 37, no. 2. pp. 147–171.
  4. ↑ Michael Brecher (May 26, 2016). The world of protracted conflicts. Lanham, Maryland. p. 11. ISBN   978-1-4985-3188-7. OCLC   1253439132.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Thompson, William R. (1999). Great power rivalries. Columbia, S.C. p. 3. ISBN   1-57003-279-3. OCLC   40142926.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  6. 1 2 "rivalry". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  7. 1 2 3 Kilduff, Gavin J.; Elfenbein, Hillary Anger; Staw, Barry M. (2010). "The psychology of rivalry: A relationally dependent analysis of competition". Academy of Management Journal . 53 (5): 943–969. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.486.8762 . doi:10.5465/amj.2010.54533171.
  8. ↑ Skeat, Walter W.; Skeat, Walter William (1993). The Concise Dictionary of English Etymology . Wordsworth Editions. ISBN   978-1-85326-311-8.
  9. ↑ The Merriam-Webster New Book of Word Histories. Merriam-Webster Inc. 1991. ISBN   978-0-87779-603-9.
  10. 1 2 "It Takes Two: The History of 'Rival' And, historically speaking, they were thirsty". Merriam-Webster . Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  11. ↑ Baldwin, James Mark; Rand, Benjamin (1902). Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology: Prefatory note. Text, Le-Z. Addenda: indices. I. Greek terms. II. Latin terms. III. German terms. IV. French terms. V. Italian terms. Macmillan.
  12. 1 2 Pigott, Stacy (October 9, 2017). "Rivalries Affect Risk in Sports, Business". University of Arizona News. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  13. ↑ Collins Cobuild Advanced Dictionary of English (2016), p. 59.
  14. ↑ Sage Michael (2011), How to Become a Superhero: the Ultimate Guide to the Ultimate You!, p. 228
  15. ↑ Roche, Mark William (February 28, 2017). Realizing the Distinctive University: Vision and Values, Strategy and Culture. University of Notre Dame Press. ISBN   978-0-268-10149-7.
  16. ↑ Charlotte Brewer (2007). Treasure-house of the language: the living OED. New Haven, Conn. p. 24. ISBN   978-0-300-12429-3. OCLC   122261575.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. 1 2 Tony Mason; Eliza Riedi (2010), Sport and the Military: The British Armed Forces 1880–1960, p. 17, ISBN   978-1139788977 .
  18. ↑ "Interservice rivalry". The Oxford Essential Dictionary of the U.S. Military. Berkley Books. 2001 – via Oxford Reference Online.
  19. ↑ National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (2006). 9/11 Commission Report. Barnes & Noble Publishing. p.  310. ISBN   978-0-7607-8174-6. During the descent, they reported seeing many firefighters who were resting and did not seem to be in the process of evacuating. They further reported advising these firefighters to evacuate, but said that at times they were not acknowledged. In the opinion of one of the ESU officers, some of these firefighters essentially refused to take orders from cops. At least one firefighter who was in the North Tower has supported that assessment, stating that he was not going to take an evacuation instruction from a cop that morning.
  20. ↑ Jane Mersky Leder (January 1, 1993). "Adult Sibling Rivalry". Psychology Today . Retrieved May 15, 2018.
  21. ↑ Syliva B. Rimm (2002). "The Effects of Sibling Competition". Dr. Sylvia Rimm. Archived from the original on July 1, 2007.
  22. ↑ Achim Schützwohl (2012). "Romantic Jealousy and Sexual Conflict". In Todd K. Shackelford; Aaron T. Goetz (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Sexual Conflict in Humans. p. 123.
  23. ↑ David M. Buss (2003), The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating, p. 101
  24. ↑ David L. Weimer; Aidan R. Vining (2005). Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Pearson: Prentice Hall. p.  72. ISBN   978-0-13-183001-1. Fourth Edition.
  25. ↑ Shohov, Serge P. (2003). Advances in Psychology Research. Nova Publishers. ISBN   978-1-59033-652-6.
  26. 1 2 Seligman, Adam B. (Winter 2009). "Ritual, the Self, and Sincerity". Social Research: An International Quarterly. 76 (4). Johns Hopkins University Press: 1073–1096. doi:10.1353/sor.2009.0007.
  27. 1 2 Clotfelter, Charles T. (March 7, 2011). Big-Time Sports in American Universities . Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-1-139-49916-3.
  28. 1 2 Helle, Horst (2008). "Soziologie Der Konkurrenz – Sociology of Competition by Georg Simmel". Canadian Journal of Sociology. 4. 33 (4): 949. doi: 10.29173/cjs4531 .
  29. ↑ Guilbeau, Glenn (October 11, 2019). "LSU-Florida rivalry is set to write a new chapter". Florida Today. Melbourne, Florida. pp. 1B. Retrieved October 11, 2019.
  30. ↑ Hutson, Matthew (June 26, 2014). "How Rivalries Bring Out Our Best — and Worst". The Cut. Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  31. ↑ "The Upside of Rivalry: Higher Motivation, Better Performance". Association for Psychological Science . September 4, 2014.
  32. ↑ To, Christopher; Kilduff, Gavin; Ordóñez, Lisa D.; Schweitzer, Maurice E. (July 17, 2018). "Research: We Take More Risks When We Compete Against Rivals". Harvard Business Review . Retrieved December 4, 2018.
  33. ↑ Yip, Jeremy A.; Schweitzer, Maurice E.; Nurmohamed, Samir (January 2018). "Trash-talking: Competitive incivility motivates rivalry, performance, and unethical behavior". Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes . 144: 125–144. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2017.06.002 .
  34. 1 2 Kilduff, Gavin J.; Galinsky, Adam D.; Gallo, Edoardo; Reade, J. James, Whatever it takes: Rivalry and unethical behavior (PDF), retrieved December 4, 2018

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.