Square-1 (puzzle)

Last updated
The Square-1 puzzle was sold in this shape with instructions for turning it back to a cube. This is halfway through a vertical turn. Square-1 half-turn.jpg
The Square-1 puzzle was sold in this shape with instructions for turning it back to a cube. This is halfway through a vertical turn.

The Square-1 is a variant of the Rubik's Cube. Its distinguishing feature among the numerous Rubik's Cube variants is that it can change shape as it is twisted, due to the way it is cut, thus adding an extra level of challenge and difficulty. The Super Square One and Square Two puzzles have also been introduced. The Super Square One has two additional layers that can be scrambled and solved independently of the rest of the puzzle, and the Square Two has extra cuts made to the top and bottom layer, making the edge and corner wedges the same size.

Contents

History

The Square-1 (full name "Back to Square One") or alternatively, "Cube 21", was invented by Karel Hršel and Vojtěch Kopský in 1990. Application for a Czechoslovak patent was filed on 8 November 1990, then filed as a "priority document" on January 1, 1991. The patent was finally approved on 26 October 1992, with patent number CS277266 Archived 2018-04-05 at the Wayback Machine . On March 16, 1993, the object itself was patented in the US with patent number US5,193,809 then its design was also patented, on October 5, 1993, with patent number D340,093.

Description

The Square-1 puzzle scrambled Square-1 scrambled.jpg
The Square-1 puzzle scrambled

The Square-1 consists of three layers. The upper and lower layers contain kite and triangular pieces. They are also called corner and edge pieces, respectively. There are altogether 8 kite and 8 triangular pieces. The kite pieces are 60 degrees wide, while the triangular pieces are 30 degrees wide, relative to the center of the layer.

The middle layer contains two trapezoid pieces, which together may form an irregular hexagon or a square.

Each layer can be rotated freely, and if the boundaries of pieces in all layers line up, the puzzle can be twisted vertically, interchanging half of the top layer with half of the bottom. In this way, the pieces of the puzzle can be scrambled. Note that because the kite pieces are precisely twice the angular width of the triangular pieces, the two can be freely intermixed, with two triangular pieces taking the place of a single kite piece and vice versa. This leads to bizarre shape changes within the puzzle at any point.

For the puzzle to be in cube shape, the upper and lower layers must have alternating kite and triangular pieces, with 4 kite and 4 triangular pieces on each layer, and the middle layer must have a square shape. However, since only two shapes are possible for the middle layer, there is a quick sequence of twists which changes the shape of the middle layer from one to the other without touching the rest of the puzzle.

Once the puzzle has a cube shape, the upper and lower layers are cut in an Iron Cross-like fashion, or equivalently cut by two concentric (standard) crosses, that make an angle with each other.

Like Rubik's Cube, the pieces are colored. For the puzzle to be solved, not only does it need to be in cube shape, but each face of the cube must also have a uniform color. In its solved (or original) state, viewing the cube from the face with the word "Square-1" printed on it, the colors are: white on top, green on the bottom, yellow in front, red on the left, orange on the right, and blue behind. Alternative versions of the Square-1 may have different color schemes.

Solutions

The same puzzle in its solved state Square-1 solved.jpg
The same puzzle in its solved state

A good number of solutions for this puzzle exist on the Internet. Some solutions employ the classical layer-by-layer method, while other approaches include putting the corner pieces in place first, then the edge pieces, or vice versa. Some solutions are a combination of these approaches. Although these solutions use different approaches, most of them try to restore the cube shape of the puzzle first, regardless of the placement of the pieces and the parity of the middle layer, and then proceed to put the pieces in their correct places while preserving the cube shape. The shape is often restored first because it allows for the greatest range of possible moves at any one time – other shapes have fewer moves available.

The majority of solutions provide a large set of algorithms. These are sequences of turns and twists that will rearrange a small number of pieces while leaving the rest of the puzzle untouched. Examples include swapping two pieces, cycling through three pieces, etc. Larger scale algorithms are also possible, such as interchanging the top and bottom layers. Through the systematic use of these algorithms, the puzzle is gradually solved.

Like solutions of the Rubik's Cube, the solutions of Square-1 depend on the use of algorithms discovered either by trial and error, or by using computer searches. However, while solutions of the Rubik's Cube rely on these algorithms more towards the end, they are heavily used throughout the course of solving the Square-1. This is because the uniform shape of the pieces in the Rubik's Cube allows one to focus on positioning a small subset of pieces while disregarding the rest, at least at the beginning of a solution. However, with the Square-1, the free intermixing of corner and edge pieces can sometimes cause a certain desired operation to be physically blocked; so one must take all pieces into account right from the beginning. Some solutions of the Square-1 rely solely on the use of algorithms.

Number of positions

If different rotations of a given permutation are counted only once while reflections are counted individually, there are 170 × 2 × 8! × 8! = 552,738,816,000 positions.

If both rotations and reflections are counted once only, the number of positions reduces to 15! ÷ 3 = 435,891,456,000. Also, it always can be solved in a maximum of 13 twists. [1]

If instead we wish to count only all those positions where there are no corner pieces in the way of twisting the halves, there are 3678·2·8!·8! = 11,958,666,854,400 twistable positions, and always can be solved in a maximum of 31 face turns. [2]

Notation

Original notation

The original Square-1 notation was created by Jaap Scherphuis:

(x,y)/(x,y)

A slash (/) indicates turning the entire right half of the puzzle by 180°.

First number (x) refers to a number of 30° upper layer clockwise turns.

Second number (y) refers to a number of 30° lower layer clockwise turns.

Negative numbers mean turning counterclockwise.

x and y are always between -5 and 6, and they must not both equal 0.

Karnaukh notation

Karnaukh notation, also known as Karnotation, was created by Daniel Karnaukh. It is based on the original notation, with brackets and slashes being removed, with the latter being replaced with spaces, and with letters being assigned to common move sets. This notation was proposed as an easier way to write, learn and share speedsolving algorithms. It was not intended to be used for scrambling the Square-1. The full notation is here, but this is an abridged version: [3]

AbbreviationUU'uu'DD'dd'EE'ee'MM'mm'
Algorithm(3,0)(-3,0)(2,-1)(-2,1)(0,3)(0,-3)(-1,2)(1,-2)(3,-3)(-3,3)(3,3)(-3,-3)(1,1)(-1,-1)(2,2)(-2,-2)

World records

The world record fastest Square-1 solve is 3.41 seconds, by Ryan Pilat of the United States on March 2, 2024 at Wichita Family ArtVenture 2024. [4]

The world record average of 5 solves (excluding fastest and slowest) is 4.91 seconds, by Max Siauw of the United States on July 22, 2023 at Stumptown Speedcubing Summer 2023 in Portland, United States, with the times of: 5.32 / 4.60 / (6.26) / 4.80 / (4.58). [5]

Top 5 solvers by single solve [4]

NameSolveCompetition
Flag of the United States.svg Ryan Pilat3.41s Flag of the United States.svg Wichita Family ArtVenture 2024
Flag of the United States.svg Max Siauw3.69s Flag of the United States.svg Uw or U Don't 2023
Flag of Poland.svg Michał Krasowski3.87s Flag of Poland.svg Olsztyn Squared 2023
Flag of Italy.svg Alessandro Ricci4.00s Flag of Italy.svg Cavarzere Cube Days 2023
Flag of the United States.svg Sameer Aggarwal4.04s Flag of the United States.svg Kenmore Mini A 2024

Top 5 solvers by Olympic average of 5 solves [5]

NameAverageCompetition
Flag of the United States.svg Max Siauw4.91s Flag of the United States.svg Stumptown Summer 2023
Flag of the United States.svg Hassan Khanani4.98s Flag of the United States.svg Western Championship 2023
Flag of the United States.svg Sameer Aggarwal5.12s Flag of the United States.svg Cumberland County Cubing 2023
Flag of the United States.svg Dylan Baumbach5.26s Flag of the United States.svg DFW Cubing Winter 2024
Flag of Australia (converted).svg David Epstein5.37s Flag of Australia (converted).svg Melbourne Summer 2023

Super Square One

The Super Square One, scrambled Super Square1 scrambled-01.jpg
The Super Square One, scrambled
The Super Square One, solved Super Square-1 solved.jpg
The Super Square One, solved
The Super Square One, mid-turn Super Square-1 scrambled-02.jpg
The Super Square One, mid-turn

The Super Square One is a 4-layer version of the Square-1. Just like the Square-1, it can adopt non-cubic shapes as it is twisted. As of 2009, it is sold by Uwe Mèffert in his puzzle shop, Meffert's.

It consists of 4 layers of 8 pieces, each surrounding a circular column which can be rotated along a perpendicular axis. This allows the pieces from the top and bottom layers and the middle two layers to be interchanged. Each layer consists of 8 movable pieces: 4 wider wedges and 4 narrower wedges. In the top and bottom layers, the wider pieces are the "corner" pieces, and the narrower pieces are the "edge pieces". In the middle two layers, the wider pieces are the "edge" pieces, and the narrower pieces are the "face centers". The wider pieces are exactly twice the angular width of the narrower pieces, so that two narrower pieces can fit in the place of one wider piece. Thus, they can be freely intermixed. This leads to the puzzle adopting a large variety of non-cubic shapes.

Square Two

Square Two made by modification of the Square-1 DIY - Square-Two - Finished Again (4273427839).jpg
Square Two made by modification of the Square-1

The "Square Two" is yet another variation of the popular Square-1 puzzle, with extra cuts on the top and bottom layers. It is also currently marketed by Meffert's online store.

The Square Two is mechanically the same as a Square-1, but the large corner wedges of the top and bottom layers are cut in half, effectively making the corner wedges as versatile as the edge wedges. This removes the locking issue present on the Square-1, which in many ways makes the Square Two easier to solve (and scramble) than its predecessor.

Solution

The Square Two, like the Super Square One, isn't much more difficult than the Square-1. In many ways, it's actually easier considering one can always make a slice turn regardless of the positions of the top and bottom layers. Mostly, it's solved just like the Original, merely requiring the extra step of combining the corner wedges. After that, it is solved exactly like the Square-1.

Number of positions

There are a total of 24 wedge pieces on the puzzle.

Any permutation of the wedge pieces is possible, including even and odd permutations. This implies there are 24!=620,448,401,733,239,439,360,000 possible permutations of these pieces.

However, the middle layer has two possible orientations for each position, increasing the number of positions by a factor of 2.

This would theoretically yield a grand total of (24!)*2=1,240,896,803,466,478,878,720,000 possible positions for the puzzle, but since the layers have 12 different orientations for each position, some positions have been counted too many times this way. This reduces the number of positions by 12^2.

The final count is (24!)/72=8,617,338,912,961,658,880,000 total possible positions.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rubik's Cube</span>

An illustration of an unsolved Rubik's Cube

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rubik's Revenge</span> 4×4×4 Rubiks cube variation

The Rubik's Revenge is a 4×4×4 version of the Rubik's Cube. It was released in 1981. Invented by Péter Sebestény, the cube was nearly called the Sebestény Cube until a somewhat last-minute decision changed the puzzle's name to attract fans of the original Rubik's Cube. Unlike the original puzzle, it has no fixed faces: the center faces are free to move to different positions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pocket Cube</span> 2x2x2 combination puzzle

The Pocket Cube is a 2×2×2 combination puzzle invented in 1970 by American puzzle designer Larry D. Nichols. The cube consists of 8 pieces, all corners.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Speedcubing</span> Solving Rubiks Cubes or other "twisty puzzles" with speed

Speedcubing, also referred to as speedsolving, is a competitive sport centered around the rapid solving of various combination puzzles. The most prominent puzzle in this category is the 3x3x3 puzzle, commonly known as the Rubik's Cube. Participants in this sport are known as "speedcubers," who focus specifically on solving these puzzles at high speeds, or more generally as "cubers". The essential aspect of solving these puzzles typically involves executing a series of predefined algorithms in a particular sequence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Professor's Cube</span> 5x5x5 version of the Rubiks Cube

The Professor's Cube is a 5×5×5 version of the original Rubik's Cube. It has qualities in common with both the 3×3×3 Rubik's Cube and the 4×4×4 Rubik's Revenge, and solution strategies for both can be applied.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyraminx</span> Variant of Rubiks Cube

The Pyraminx is a regular tetrahedron puzzle in the style of Rubik's Cube. It was made and patented by Uwe Mèffert after the original 3 layered Rubik's Cube by Ernő Rubik, and introduced by Tomy Toys of Japan in 1981.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Megaminx</span> Puzzle

The Megaminx or Mégaminx is a dodecahedron-shaped puzzle similar to the Rubik's Cube. It has a total of 50 movable pieces to rearrange, compared to the 20 movable pieces of the Rubik's Cube.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rubik's Cube group</span> Mathematical group

The Rubik's Cube group is a group that represents the structure of the Rubik's Cube mechanical puzzle. Each element of the set corresponds to a cube move, which is the effect of any sequence of rotations of the cube's faces. With this representation, not only can any cube move be represented, but any position of the cube as well, by detailing the cube moves required to rotate the solved cube into that position. Indeed with the solved position as a starting point, there is a one-to-one correspondence between each of the legal positions of the Rubik's Cube and the elements of . The group operation is the composition of cube moves, corresponding to the result of performing one cube move after another.

The CFOP method, also known as the Fridrich method, is one of the most commonly used methods in speedsolving a 3×3×3 Rubik's Cube and is one of the fastest methods. This method was first developed in the early 1980s, combining innovations by a number of speed cubers. Jessica Fridrich, a Czech speed cuber and the namesake of the method, is generally credited for popularizing it by publishing it online in 1997.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyramorphix</span>

The Pyramorphix, also called Pyramorphinx, is a tetrahedral puzzle similar to the Rubik's Cube. It has a total of 8 movable pieces to rearrange, compared to the 20 of the Rubik's Cube. Although it looks like a trivially simple version of the Pyraminx, it is an edge-turning puzzle with the mechanism identical to that of the Pocket Cube.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V-Cube 6</span> 6×6×6 Rubiks Cube

The V-Cube 6 is a 6×6×6 version of the original Rubik's Cube. The first mass-produced 6×6×6 was invented by Panagiotis Verdes and is produced by the Greek company Verdes Innovations SA. Other such puzzles have since been introduced by a number of Chinese companies, most of which have mechanisms which improve on the original. Unlike the original puzzle, it has no fixed facets: the center facets are free to move to different positions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impossiball</span>

The Impossiball is a rounded icosahedral puzzle similar to the Rubik's Cube. It has a total of 20 movable pieces to rearrange, which is the same as the Rubik's Cube, but all of the Impossiball's pieces are corners, like the Pocket Cube.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V-Cube 7</span> Larger variant of the Rubiks cube

The V-Cube 7 is a combination puzzle in the form of a 7×7×7 cube. The first mass-produced 7×7×7 was invented by Panagiotis Verdes and is produced by the Greek company Verdes Innovations SA. Other such puzzles have since been introduced by a number of Chinese companies, some of which have mechanisms which improve on the original. Like the 5×5×5, the V-Cube 7 has both fixed and movable center facets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyraminx Crystal</span>

The Pyraminx Crystal is a dodecahedral puzzle similar to the Rubik's Cube and the Megaminx. It is manufactured by Uwe Mèffert and has been sold in his puzzle shop since 2008.

<i>The Simple Solution to Rubiks Cube</i> 1981 book by James G. Nourse

The Simple Solution to Rubik's Cube by James G. Nourse is a book that was published in 1981. The book explains how to solve the Rubik's Cube. The book became the best-selling book of 1981, selling 6,680,000 copies that year. It was the fastest-selling title in the 36-year history of Bantam Books.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Void Cube</span> 3x3x3 without centers

The Void Cube is a 3-D mechanical puzzle similar to a Rubik's Cube, with the notable difference being that the center pieces are missing, which causes the puzzle to resemble a level 1 Menger sponge. The core used on the Rubik's Cube is also absent, creating holes straight through the cube on all three axes. Due to the restricted volume of the puzzle it employs an entirely different structural mechanism from a regular Rubik's Cube, though the possible moves are the same. The Void Cube was invented by Katsuhiko Okamoto. Gentosha Education, in Japan, holds the license to manufacture official Void Cubes. These official designs are also sold under the Rubik's brand, owned by Spin Master Ltd., and workalikes are available from a variety of manufacturers. Speed-solving the Void Cube is common in exhibition but is not an official World Cube Association competition event.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pyraminx Duo</span>

The Pyraminx Duo is a tetrahedral twisty puzzle in the style of the Rubik's Cube. It was suggested by Rob Stegmann, invented by Oskar van Deventer, and has now been mass-produced by Meffert's.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V-Cube 8</span> 8×8×8 version of Rubiks Cube

The V-Cube 8 is an 8×8×8 version of the Rubik's Cube. Unlike the original puzzle, it has no fixed facets: the center facets are free to move to different positions. The design was covered by Panagiotis Verdes' patent from 2007 but Verdes Innovations SA did not produce it for sale until 2014. Other manufacturers released their own versions of the puzzle much earlier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gear Cube</span> 3D combination puzzle based on the Rubiks Cube

The Gear Cube is a 3-D combination puzzle designed and created by Dutch puzzle maker Oskar van Deventer based on an idea by Bram Cohen. It was initially produced by Shapeways in 2009 and known as "Caution Cube" due to the likelihood of getting one's fingers stuck between the gears while speedcubing. Later, in 2010, it was mass-produced by Meffert's as the "Gear Cube".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dino Cube</span>

The Dino Cube is a cubic twisty puzzle in the style of the Rubik's Cube. It was invented in 1985 by Robert Webb, though it was not mass-produced until ten years later. It has a total of 12 external movable pieces to rearrange, compared to 20 movable pieces on the Rubik's Cube.

References

  1. "(Back to) Square One / Cube 21".
  2. "(Back to) Square One / Cube 21".
  3. "Square-1 notation - Speedsolving.com Wiki". www.speedsolving.com. Retrieved 2022-04-23.
  4. 1 2 World Cube Association
  5. 1 2 World Cube Association