Talbot Resolves

Last updated
Talbot Resolves
Part of the American Revolution
TalbotResolvesV2cropped.jpg
Historic marker for Talbot Resolves
DateMay 24, 1774;250 years ago (1774-05-24)
Location
Easton, Maryland, U.S.

38°46′29.5″N76°4′36.5″W / 38.774861°N 76.076806°W / 38.774861; -76.076806
Caused by Boston Port Act
GoalsTo protest British Parliament's closing of the Port of Boston as punishment for the Boston Tea Party.
Parties
Lead figures

The Talbot Resolves was a proclamation made by Talbot County citizens of the British Province of Maryland, on May 24, 1774. The British Parliament had decided to blockade Boston Harbor as punishment for a protest against taxes on tea. The protest became known as the Boston Tea Party. The Talbot Resolves was a statement of support for the city of Boston in the Province of Massachusetts Bay.

The author of the Talbot Resolves is unknown. Speculation has been made that the author is Matthew Tilghman or a group of citizens that included Tilghman, Edward Lloyd IV, Nicholas Thomas, and Robert Goldsborough IV. All four were leading citizens of Talbot County, and they represented the county in a meeting of all of Maryland's counties held in June shortly after the reading of the Talbot Resolves.

Within the next 14 months, statements or resolves were issued elsewhere in the colonies. The First and Second Continental Congresses met, and the American Revolutionary War began. A Declaration of Independence was made on July 4, 1776, and a new independent government for the state of Maryland was formed.

Background

A charter for the Province of Maryland was issued to Lord Baltimore in 1632 by the king of England. [1] The colony became part of a group of English (later British) colonies located along the east coast of North America. [2] During the 1760s after the French and Indian War, Great Britain began imposing taxes on its North American colonies. [3] From the British point of view, the colonies were being taxed to cover the cost of the British Army protecting them. [4] Taxes related to the American Act of 1764 and Stamp Act of 1765 caused discontent in the colonies. [5] The major objection was that the taxes were being imposed on the colonists by politicians that did not represent colonists. A slogan often used by the colonists was "no taxation without representation". [6]

Protests against taxes

A popular pamphlet written by Maryland lawyer Daniel Dulany in 1765 was called Considerations on the Propriety of Imposing Taxes in the British Colonies . Although this pamphlet complained mostly against the Stamp Act, it also noted that the restriction on the colonial export of tobacco to countries other than Great Britain was costing farmers money. [7] Notable incidents of violence that occurred between 1765 and 1767 happened at Pokomoke, Maryland; Dighton, Massachusetts; Boston, Massachusetts; Newbury, Massachusetts; and Charlestown, South Carolina. These events typically happened between customs officers and locals. [8]

In Talbot County, Maryland, a group of unknown citizens released "Resolutions of the Freemen of Talbot County Maryland" on November 25, 1765—nearly a decade before the release of the Talbot Resolves. They assembled at the county court house, and declared loyalty to King George III. They also declared that they should enjoy the same rights as British subjects. The remainder of their proclamation complained about the Stamp Act. They also declared that they would erect a gallows ("gibbet") in front of the court house door with an effigy of a stamp informer hung in chains, which would remain until the Stamp Act was repealed. [9] On March 18, 1766, Parliament repealed the Stamp Act, but it also passed the Declaratory Act—which reasserted that Parliament had authority and control in the American colonies. [10]

In 1767, Parliament passed the Townshend Acts which added different types of taxes which were used to fund colonial governors and judges. [3] Among the new law's provisions was an import tax on items such as glass, paper, and tea—all of which had to be imported from Britain. [11] The act reinvigorated dissent. [3] In March 1770, British troops fired on an angry mob of colonists in what became known as the Boston Massacre. [3] During the same month, many of the taxes from the Townshend Acts were repealed. An exception was the tax on tea. [11]

Boston Tea Party

Boston Tea Party mural in statehouse Boston Tea Party, State House Mural, Boston, Mass (NYPL b12647398-73818).tiff
Boston Tea Party mural in statehouse

Effective May 10, 1773, the Tea Act of 1773 went into effect. This act was designed to assist the financially troubled British East India Company and enable tea to enter North America priced lower than the tea typically smuggled in to avoid taxes. [3] Colonists recognized that by buying this lower-cost tea, and paying the import tax from the Townshend Acts, they would be setting a precedent of abiding by a type of tax they believed unfair. [12]

On December 16, 1773, a protest led mostly by the Sons of Liberty was conducted in Boston Harbor. Men dressed as Native Americans boarded a British East India Company ship in the harbor at night and destroyed its entire shipment of tea by throwing it into the water. [3] The December 16 incident became known as the Boston Tea Party, and it led to defiance in other colonies and similar protests. [3] Over the next few weeks, tea from the British East India Company was rejected at ports in Charleston, New York, and Philadelphia. [13] Later in the year, citizens of Annapolis, Maryland, had their own tea party. On October 19, 1774, the owner of the Maryland cargo ship Peggy Stewart was forced to burn his ship, with its cargo of tea, at the port of Annapolis. [14]

British Parliament reacted to the Boston Tea Party by passing a group of punitive laws aimed at Massachusetts called the Coercive Acts. In the North America the Coercive Acts became known as the Intolerable Acts. The first of this group of acts was the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston's port. [15] British leadership hoped their punishment for Massachusetts would cause other colonies to tone down their resistance to authority. Instead, the acts caused the Thirteen Colonies to unite in defiance, leading to the American Revolution and the American Revolutionary War. [15]

The Resolves

Talbot County courthouse in 2023 Easton Courthouse.jpg
Talbot County courthouse in 2023

The Talbot Resolves was a proclamation in support of the citizens of Boston. It was read by leading citizens of Talbot County at Talbot Court House on May 24, 1774. [16] [Note 1] The statement was read in response to the British plan to close the Port of Boston on June 1 as punishment for the Boston Tea Party protest. [16] Not all of the region's residents agreed with the proclamation. Residents of Maryland's Eastern Shore of the Chesapeake Bay were a mixture of revolutionaries, loyalists, and neutralists. They typically "rejected outside influences" of all types, and some believed that a cause concerning Boston did not have to be a cause of Maryland. [18]

John Thomas Scharf, a 19th-century historian and author of a history of Maryland, wrote that "...no county was more decided in its action than Talbot. [19] [Note 2] Another author wrote that the May 24 meeting in Talbot County was "among the very earliest" of those type of "meetings held in Maryland". [21] Statements similar to the Talbot Resolves were made elsewhere in the British North American colonies. George Washington and George Mason were involved with the Fairfax Resolves. [22] In Massachusetts, the Suffolk Resolves were composed. [23]

Creation of the Talbot Resolves

It is believed that in 1958 Baltimore writer Neil H. Swanson was the first to call the statement made at Talbot Court House the Talbot Resolves. [24] The earliest record of the Talbot Resolves is at the bottom of page 3 in the September 2, 1774, edition of the Maryland Gazette. The word "resolve" is nowhere to be found in the article. [25] On the same newspaper page is another article that lists a statement made by the citizens of Chester Town, and it makes liberal use of the term "resolved". [20] [Note 3] A summary paragraph of the Chester Town proclamation, in a paragraph above the Talbot Court House statement and below the Chester Town statement, says "The above resolves were entered into upon a discovery of a late importation of the dutiable tea...." [20]

No record is known to exist of the men at the meeting that produced the Talbot Resolves. Matthew Tilghman of Rich Neck Manor, a future member of the First Continental Congress, is the person said to have called the meeting on the courthouse lawn. [16] On June 22, Tilghman, Edward Lloyd IV of Wye House, Nicholas Thomas of Anderton, and Robert Goldsborough IV of Myrtle Grove represented Talbot County's committee of correspondence. They met in Annapolis with similar committees from other Maryland counties. [27] [Note 4] It is possible, some say probable, that Tilghman and/or the other three men elected as representatives wrote the document. [16] [Note 5]

The Talbot Resolves
 Alarmed at the present situation of America and impressed with the most tender feelings for the distresses of their brethren and fellow subjects in Boston, a number of gentlemen having met at this place, took into their serious consideration the part they ought to act as friends of liberty and the general interests of mankind.

To preserve the rights and to secure the property of the subject, they apprehend is the end of government. But when those rights are invaded—when the mode prescribed by the laws for the punishment of offences and obtaining justice is disregarded and spurned—when without being heard in their defence, force is employed in the severest penalties inflicted; the people, they clearly perceive, have a right not only to complain, but like–wise to exert their utmost endeavors to prevent the effect of such measures as may be adopted by a weak and corrupt ministry to destroy their liberties, to deprive them of their property and rob them of the dearest birthright as Britons.

Impressed with the warmest zeal for and loyalty to their most gracious sovereign, and with the most sincere affection for their fellow subjects in Great Britain, they have determined calmly and steadily to unite with their fellow subjects in pursuing every legal and constitutional measure to avert the evils threatened by the late act of Parliament for shutting up the port of Boston; to support the common rights of America and to promote the union and harmony between the mother country and the colonies on which the preservation of both must finally depend. [29]

Aftermath

The 13 British American colonies before the United States existed Thirteencolonies politics cropped.jpg
The 13 British American colonies before the United States existed

In June 1774, Tilghman, Lloyd, Thomas, and Goldsborough represented Talbot County in a convention of Providence of Maryland counties held in Annapolis. Tilghman was elected as chairman of the convention. A series of resolutions condemning recent acts of Parliament were made. [30] Another resolution made was that a general congress of all of the colonies should meet in Philadelphia during September—"a firm union of sister colonies". [23] Tilghman was among those selected to represent Maryland in Philadelphia, and this meeting became known as the First Continental Congress. [30] The Philadelphia meeting of the First Continental Congress began on September 5, 1774, and it continued into October. A boycott of British goods was threatened, and statements explaining the position of the colonies were issued. [31]

The Second Continental Congress met in Philadelphia on May 10, 1775. By this time, the American Revolutionary War had begun. On July 4, 1776, the Second Continental Congress approved and signed "The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America", which later became known in the United States as the Declaration of Independence. [31]

Tilghman again was one of the representatives of Maryland in the Second Continental Congress, but was unable to sign the Declaration because he returned to Maryland to lead its government. In 1781 the Chesapeake Bay was patrolled by British warships, making it necessary for Maryland to split its government into territory west of the bay and territory east of the bay (Maryland's Eastern Shore). This temporary Eastern Shore government met in Easton, Maryland, and Tilghman became its president. [32] He resigned from all government activities in 1783 after the end of the American Revolutionary War, and died May 5, 1790. [33]

Edward Lloyd IV continued to be involved in Maryland politics until his death in 1796. [34] He was also a delegate for the state of Maryland to the Congress of the United States for 1783 and 1784. [35] Robert Goldsborough IV continued his involvement in Maryland politics, and he was a judge in Maryland General Court from 1784 to 1798. He died in 1798. [36] Lawyer Nicholas Thomas represented Talbot County in Maryland's Lower House, and was house speaker from 1777 through 1778. He was involved with the Talbot County Militia during 1776, and a judge in General Court from 1778 to 1782. He died in 1784. [37]

Notes

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Talbot Court House was the name of the village that surrounded Talbot County's courthouse beginning in 1712. An Act from 1785 named the town Talbot, but another Act from 1788 changed the town's name to Easton. It is believed that the name Easton evolved from "East Town", since the community was once the seat of Maryland government for the state's territory east of Chesapeake Bay (a.k.a. Maryland's Eastern Shore). [17]
  2. ↑ Sharf also wrote that Talbot County had the earliest response. [19] That might not be true because at the top of the same Maryland Gazette page that contained the Talbot Court House statement is a similar (although longer) resolution released by Chester Town, Maryland that is dated earlier—May 19, 1774. Although the Chester Town document condemns the tax on tea, it does not mention Boston. [20]
  3. ↑ Local lore, unsubstantiated, says that the Chester Town Resolves were drafted in response to the Boston Tea Party, and a Chestertown Tea Party mimicking the Boston Tea Part occurred during May 1774 when tea was thrown into the Chester River. [26]
  4. ↑ The purpose of each county's committee of correspondence was to "give guidance to any political movements and hold communication with bodies of the same kind wherever they had been organized throughout the colonies". [27]
  5. ↑ Matthew Tilghman's nephew is Tench Tilghman, who was an aide-de-camp for General George Washington during the American Revolutionary War. The family also included loyalists. [28]

Citations

  1. ↑ Hall 1902 , p. 29
  2. ↑ Samuel Dunn and Robert Sayer (1774). A Map of the British empire in North America (Map). London: Robert Sayer. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "The Boston Tea Party". American Battlefield Trust. Retrieved August 28, 2024.
  4. ↑ Knollenberg 1975 , p. 42
  5. ↑ Knollenberg 1975 , pp. 2, 14
  6. ↑ ""No Taxation Without Representation"". American Battlefield Trust. Archived from the original on September 12, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  7. ↑ Knollenberg 1975 , pp. 32–33
  8. ↑ Knollenberg 1975 , p. 61
  9. ↑ Tilghman & Harrison 1915 , pp. 44–45
  10. ↑ "Parliament - an Act Repealing the Stamp Act; March 18, 1766". American Battlefield Trust. Archived from the original on July 15, 2024. Retrieved September 27, 2024.; "Declaratory Act". American Battlefield Trust. Archived from the original on May 22, 2024. Retrieved September 27, 2024.
  11. 1 2 "Townshend Act 1767". American Battlefield Trust. Archived from the original on July 16, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  12. ↑ Knollenberg 1975 , p. 95
  13. ↑ Knollenberg 1975 , p. 102
  14. ↑ "Burning of the Peggy Steward - The Annapolis Tea Party". Maryland State House. Archived from the original on September 13, 2024. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  15. 1 2 "The Intolerable Acts". American Battlefield Trust. Archived from the original on August 24, 2024. Retrieved September 12, 2024.
  16. 1 2 3 4 "Talbot County Commemorates the 250th Anniversary of the Talbot Resolves". Star-Democrat (Easton, Maryland). Adams Publishing Group. May 29, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
  17. ↑ "History of Easton, Maryland". Town of Easton, Maryland. Archived from the original on September 4, 2024. Retrieved September 3, 2024.
  18. ↑ Neville 2009 , p. 140
  19. 1 2 Scharf 1879 , p. 148
  20. 1 2 3 "Chester Town, May 19, 1774 - To the Printers of the Maryland Gazette (top of page 3)". Maryland Gazette. Anne Catharine Green and Son. June 6, 1774. Archived from the original on September 4, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
  21. ↑ Tilghman & Harrison 1915 , p. 60
  22. ↑ "Fairfax County Resolves, 18 July 1774". National Historical Publications and Records Commission, U.S. National Archives. Retrieved September 14, 2024.; Warford-Johnston 2016 , p. 88
  23. 1 2 Warford-Johnston 2016 , p. 88
  24. ↑ Preston, Dickson (May 22, 1974). "Talbot Yesterday - Were there any Talbot Resolves?". Star-Democrat (Easton, Maryland). In 1958, a Baltimore writer and lecturer named Neil H. Swanson came across the Talbot statement. He appears to have been the first to call it the "Talbot Resolves".
  25. ↑ "Talbot Court House, May 24, 1774 (bottom of page 3)". Maryland Gazette. Anne Catharine Green and Son. June 6, 1774. Archived from the original on September 4, 2024. Retrieved September 2, 2024.
  26. ↑ "Chestertown Tea Party: Fact or Fiction". Edward H. Nabb Research Center - Salisbury University. Archived from the original on September 6, 2024. Retrieved September 6, 2024.
  27. 1 2 Tilghman & Harrison 1915 , p. 61; Weeks, Bourne & Maryland Historical Trust 1984 , p. 78
  28. ↑ "Archives of Maryland - Tench Tilghman (1744-1786)". Maryland State Archives. Archived from the original on September 28, 2024. Retrieved September 14, 2024.
  29. ↑ Weeks, Bourne & Maryland Historical Trust 1984 , p. 78
  30. 1 2 Tilghman & Harrison 1915a , p. 426
  31. 1 2 "Continental Congress, 1774–1781". Office of the Historian, Department of State, United States of America. Archived from the original on June 25, 2024. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  32. ↑ Tilghman & Harrison 1915a , pp. 427–428
  33. ↑ Tilghman & Harrison 1915a , p. 428; "Tilghman, Matthew 1718-1790". Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, Library of Congress. Retrieved August 18, 2024.
  34. ↑ Tilghman & Harrison 1915a , pp. 176, 180
  35. ↑ Tilghman & Harrison 1915a , p. 180
  36. ↑ "Archives of Maryland - Robert Goldsborough IV (1740-1798)". Maryland State Archives. Archived from the original on September 28, 2024. Retrieved September 13, 2024.
  37. ↑ "Archives of Maryland - Nicholas Thomas (d. 1784)". Maryland State Archives. Archived from the original on June 15, 2024. Retrieved September 13, 2024.

Related Research Articles

The Continental Congress was a series of legislative bodies, with some executive function, for the Thirteen Colonies of Great Britain in North America, and the newly declared United States before, during, and after the American Revolutionary War. The Continental Congress refers to both the First and Second Congresses of 1774–1781 and at the time, also described the Congress of the Confederation of 1781–1789. The Confederation Congress operated as the first federal government until being replaced following ratification of the U.S. Constitution. Until 1785, the Congress met predominantly at what is today Independence Hall in Philadelphia, though it was relocated temporarily on several occasions during the Revolutionary War and the fall of Philadelphia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stamp Act 1765</span> 1765 British statute which taxed its American colonies use of printed materials

The Stamp Act 1765, also known as the Duties in American Colonies Act 1765, was an Act of the Parliament of Great Britain which imposed a direct tax on the British colonies in America and required that many printed materials in the colonies be produced on stamped paper from London which included an embossed revenue stamp. Printed materials included legal documents, magazines, playing cards, newspapers, and many other types of paper used throughout the colonies, and it had to be paid in British currency, not in colonial paper money.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intolerable Acts</span> Series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774

The Intolerable Acts, sometimes referred to as the Insufferable Acts or Coercive Acts, were a series of five punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774 after the Boston Tea Party. The laws aimed to punish Massachusetts colonists for their defiance in the Tea Party protest of the Tea Act, a tax measure enacted by Parliament in May 1773. In Great Britain, these laws were referred to as the Coercive Acts. They were a key development leading to the outbreak of the American Revolutionary War in April 1775.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Annapolis Convention (1774–1776)</span> Revolutionary War government of Maryland

The Annapolis Convention was an Assembly of the Counties of Maryland that functioned as the colony's provincial government from 1774 to 1776 during the early days leading up to the American Revolution. After 1775, it was officially named the Assembly of Freemen.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Matthew Tilghman</span> American politician (1718–1790)

Matthew Tilghman was an American planter, and Revolutionary leader from Maryland. He served as a delegate to the Continental Congress from 1774 to 1776, where he signed the 1774 Continental Association.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Townshend Acts</span> Political precursor to the American Revolution

The Townshend Acts or Townshend Duties were a series of British acts of Parliament passed during 1767 and 1768 introducing a series of taxes and regulations to enable administration of the British colonies in America. They are named after the Chancellor of the Exchequer who proposed the programme. Historians vary slightly as to which acts they include under the heading "Townshend Acts", but five are often listed:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Continental Association</span> 1774 American trade boycott with England

The Continental Association, also known as the Articles of Association or simply the Association, was an agreement among the American colonies adopted by the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia on October 20, 1774. It was a result of the escalating American Revolution and called for a trade boycott against British merchants by the colonies. Congress hoped that placing economic sanctions on British imports and exports would pressure Parliament into addressing the colonies' grievances, especially repealing the Intolerable Acts, which were strongly opposed by the colonies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Suffolk Resolves</span> Massachusetts revolutionary declaration

The Suffolk Resolves was a declaration made on September 9, 1774, by the leaders of Suffolk County, Massachusetts. The declaration rejected the Massachusetts Government Act and resulted in a boycott of imported goods from Britain unless the Intolerable Acts were repealed. The Resolves were recognized by statesman Edmund Burke as a major development in colonial animosity leading to adoption of the United States Declaration of Independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain in 1776, and he urged British conciliation with the American colonies, to little effect. The First Continental Congress endorsed the Resolves on September 17, 1774, and passed the similarly themed Continental Association on October 20, 1774.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boston Tea Party</span> 1773 American protest against British taxation

The Boston Tea Party was an American political and mercantile protest on December 16, 1773, by the Sons of Liberty in Boston in colonial Massachusetts. The target was the Tea Act of May 10, 1773, which allowed the East India Company to sell tea from China in American colonies without paying taxes apart from those imposed by the Townshend Acts. The Sons of Liberty strongly opposed the taxes in the Townshend Act as a violation of their rights. In response, the Sons of Liberty, some disguised as Native Americans, destroyed an entire shipment of tea sent by the East India Company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chestertown Tea Party</span> Political protests by American colonists

The Chestertown Tea Party was a protest against British excise duties which, according to local legend, took place in May 1774 in Chestertown, Maryland as a response to the British Tea Act. Chestertown tradition holds that, following the example of the more famous Boston Tea Party, colonial patriots boarded the brigantine Geddes in broad daylight and threw its cargo of tea into the Chester River. The event is celebrated each Memorial Day weekend with a festival and historic reenactment called the Chestertown Tea Party Festival.

The Fairfax Resolves were a set of resolutions adopted by a committee in Fairfax County in the Colony of Virginia on July 18, 1774, in the early stages of the American Revolution. Written at the behest of George Washington and others, they were authored primarily by George Mason. The resolutions rejected the British Parliament's claim of supreme authority over the American colonies. More than thirty counties in Virginia passed similar resolutions in 1774, "but the Fairfax Resolves were the most detailed, the most influential, and the most radical."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Tilghman</span> American politician (1716–1793)

James Tilghman (1716–1793) was a prominent lawyer and public servant in colonial Maryland and Pennsylvania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress</span>

The Declaration and Resolves of the First Continental Congress was a statement adopted by the First Continental Congress on October 14, 1774, in response to the Intolerable Acts passed by the British Parliament. The Declaration outlined colonial objections to the Intolerable Acts, listed a colonial bill of rights, and provided a detailed list of grievances. It was similar to the Declaration of Rights and Grievances, passed by the Stamp Act Congress a decade earlier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Petition to the King</span> 1774 petition to George III seeking repeal of the Intolerable Acts

The Petition to the King was a petition sent to King George III by the First Continental Congress in 1774, calling for the repeal of the Intolerable Acts. The King's rejection of the Petition, was one of the causes of the later United States Declaration of Independence and American Revolutionary War. The Continental Congress had hoped to resolve conflict without a war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">St. Michaels Historic District</span> Historic district in Maryland, United States

The Saint Michaels Historic District encompasses the historic center of Saint Michaels, Maryland. The town, which has about 1,000 permanent residents, is on a tributary to the Chesapeake Bay on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. After over 100 years as a center for trade and shipbuilding, the community was incorporated as a town in 1805. Shipbuilding peaked in 1820, and the town's economy became focused more on oyster and seafood collection and packing. In the 1970s, the town transitioned to tourism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Easton Historic District (Easton, Maryland)</span> Historic district in Maryland, United States

The Easton Historic District is a historic district that covers most of the core of the town of Easton, Maryland. The town is the county seat of Talbot County. The state of Maryland is nearly split by the Chesapeake Bay, and Easton is located on the east side of the bay that is known as Maryland's Eastern Shore. Although the town is part of the east coast of the United States, the region's history goes back to a time when Maryland was a colonial province of England.

The colonial families of Maryland were the leading families in the Province of Maryland. Several also had interests in the Colony of Virginia, and the two are sometimes referred to as the Chesapeake Colonies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maryland in the American Revolution</span>

Then Province of Maryland had been a British / English colony since 1632, when Sir George Calvert, first Baron of Baltimore and Lord Baltimore (1579-1632), received a charter and grant from King Charles I of England and first created a haven for English Roman Catholics in the New World, with his son, Cecilius Calvert (1605-1675), the second Lord Baltimore equipping and sending over the first colonists to the Chesapeake Bay region in March 1634. The first signs of rebellion against the mother country occurred in 1765, when the tax collector Zachariah Hood was injured while landing at the second provincial capital of Annapolis docks, arguably the first violent resistance to British taxation in the colonies. After a decade of bitter argument and internal discord, Maryland declared itself a sovereign state in 1776. The province was one of the Thirteen Colonies of British America to declare independence from Great Britain and joined the others in signing a collective Declaration of Independence that summer in the Second Continental Congress in nearby Philadelphia. Samuel Chase, William Paca, Thomas Stone, and Charles Carroll of Carrollton signed on Maryland's behalf.

Rowan Resolves is the short name for a colonial era document called Resolutions by inhabitants of Rowan County concerning resistance to Parliamentary taxation and the Provincial Congress of North Carolina. It was signed in Salisbury, Rowan County, in the royal Province of North Carolina on August 8, 1774 in response to a series of punitive laws passed by the British Parliament in 1774, the Intolerable Acts, after the political protest against Tea Act in Boston, the Colony of Massachusetts Bay, commonly known as Boston Tea Party. Rowan County was the first county in North Carolina to adopt such resolutions in the early stages of American Revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ratcliffe Manor</span> Historic home in Easton, Maryland

Ratcliffe Manor, occasionally misspelled as "Radcliffe Manor", is a Georgian colonial home in Maryland completed around 1762 by Henry Hollyday. It gets its name from the "Mannour of Ratcliffe", which is one of the Maryland Eastern Shore's oldest land grants. The dwelling is considered one of the most distinctive plantation houses on the Eastern Shore, with a northeast facade on the land approach side and a nearly identical southwest facade on the river approach side. The entire property is included in the Maryland Historical Trust's Inventory of Historic Properties. A set of photographs of the estate, made in the 1930s and 1940s, is part of the Historic American Buildings Survey administered by the Library of Congress and National Park Service.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.