United States Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction

Last updated

The Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, [1] colloquially referred to as the Supercommittee, was a joint select committee of the United States Congress, created by the Budget Control Act of 2011 on August 2, 2011. This act was intended to prevent the sovereign default that could have resulted from the 2011 United States debt-ceiling crisis. The objective of the committee was to develop a deficit reduction plan over 10 years in addition to the $917 billion of cuts and initial debt limit increase of $900 billion in the Budget Control Act of 2011 that avoided a U.S. sovereign default. The committee recommendation was to have been subject to a simple vote by the full legislative bodies without amendment; this extraordinary provision was included to limit partisan gridlock. [2] The goal outlined in the Budget Control Act of 2011 was to cut at least $1.5 trillion over the coming 10 years (avoiding much larger "sequestration" across-the-board cuts which would be equal to the debt ceiling increase of $1.2 trillion incurred by Congress through a failure to produce a deficit reduction bill), therefore bypassing Congressional debate and resulting in a passed bill by December 23, 2011. [3] On November 21, the committee concluded its work, issuing a statement that began with the following: "After months of hard work and intense deliberations, we have come to the conclusion today that it will not be possible to make any bipartisan agreement available to the public before the committee's deadline." [4] The committee was formally terminated on January 31, 2012. [5]

Contents

Historical precedents

In both form and process, the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction was an unusual construct in the American federal legislative system. [3] [6] The Base Realignment and Closure process provides a partial precedent. [7] Senate historian Donald Ritchie found inexact parallels between the Joint Select Committee and various historical joint committees. [6] The only precedent for the committee's power to write and report legislation is the 1946–1977 Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. [6]

Structure and membership

The committee comprised twelve members of Congress, six from the House of Representatives and six from the Senate, with each delegation evenly divided between Democrats and Republicans. [8] Three members each were appointed by the Speaker and Minority Leader of the House and by the Majority and Minority Leaders of the Senate. [1] [9] Two of the members were designated as co-chairs, one each by the Senate Majority Leader and by the Speaker of the House. [1] The law made no requirement that either chair be from a specific house or a specific party. The Los Angeles Times predicted before the committee was constituted that the "most important players" in the process would be the four leaders selecting the twelve committee members. [10] Commentators noted that the plan would advance with a seven-member majority if any single member deviated from party lines. [10] [11]

Members

On August 9, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, announced the Senate's Democratic members of the committee. [12] Speaker John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell announced the Republican appointments to the committee from both houses on August 10, 2011. [13] House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi announced her choices on the following day. [14]

MajorityMinority
Senate members
House members

Murray was serving as the Senate Democratic Conference Secretary, chair of the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, and chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Hensarling was vice-chair of the House Committee on Financial Services, chairman emeritus of the Republican Study Committee, and House Republican Conference Chair.

Kerry and Baucus were each chairing standing Senate committees (Foreign Relations and Finance, respectively), members of the Senate Finance Committee and were among the ten most senior members of the U.S. Senate. Kyl was Senate Minority Whip. Toomey was a member of the Joint Economic Committee. Portman was a former director of the Office of Management and Budget and a former U.S. Trade Representative.

Camp was chairing the House Committee on Ways and Means and the Joint Committee on Taxation. Upton was chairing the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Clyburn was the third-ranking House Democrat. Becerra was the ranking member of the Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee and was vice-chair of the House Democratic Caucus. Van Hollen was the ranking member of the House Budget Committee and had formerly chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.

Baucus, Becerra, Camp, and Hensarling had served on the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform; all four had voted against the Simpson-Bowles plan that emerged from that committee. [15]

Operation

The Budget Control Act increased the debt ceiling by $400 billion in August 2011. Concurrently, it required the federal government to make $917 billion in spending cuts over a ten-year period as a first installment. [3] This was based on estimates by the Congressional Budget Office [16] using current-law economic baseline, including the expiration of the Bush tax cuts. Under the Act, government revenues were projected to rise after 2012. [17]

Recommendation

The committee was charged with issuing a recommendation by November 23, 2011, for at least $1.5 trillion in additional deficit reduction steps to be undertaken over a ten‐year period. [6] [9] [18] This would have been the second installment of deficit reduction measures. Possible areas to be examined by the committee included: revenue increases, including raising taxes; tax reforms, such as simplifying the tax code and eliminating some tax breaks and loopholes; military spending cuts; and measures to reform and slow the growth of entitlement programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. [17] According to White House economics adviser Gene Sperling, "everything is on the table." [19]

Congressional vote

The committee's recommendations were to have been put to a simple up or down vote by Congress by December 23, 2011. [6] The vote would not have been subject to amendments, House "majority of the majority" blocks, or Senate filibusters, guaranteeing a pure majority vote in both chambers. [1] [6] [9] A "trigger mechanism" was included in the bill to enact $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts in the event that the committee could not agree on a recommendation or the full Congress failed to pass it. [9] The bill stipulated that this automatic second installment of deficit reduction measures be split between the national security and domestic arenas, [9] with the biggest entitlement programs excluded. [10] The targeting of the automatic cuts was intended to provide incentives to both sides to compromise. [20] [21]

Hearings and meetings

While the majority of the committee's business was conducted through private negotiations, five hearings and meetings are public record.

Debate over merit

Support

Supporters believed that the prospect of imminent across–the–board spending cuts if the committee's measures were not adopted would be sufficiently "distasteful to lawmakers" to prompt them to act [6] and to impart a "strong incentive for bipartisan agreement." [17] Representative Rob Andrews of New Jersey supported the idea as a way to "avoid a default" although he expressed concerns that it would take too long for lawmakers to learn the "nuances of Medicare and Medicaid" with respect to intricate reimbursement formulas. [6]

Criticism

Criticism of the committee arrangement included comments from lawmakers concerned by how rapidly the Budget Control Act legislation was put together; they objected to having little time to review the rules by which the committee would operate, and to the lack of input on the mechanism from public hearings or debate. [27] Legislators from both major parties expressed concern that the arrangement would "usurp their authority to write and revise legislation." [6] Presidential candidate Representative Ron Paul suggested that members of Congress might be under "tremendous pressure" to vote for the committee's recommendation regardless of its merit. [28] Huffington Post critic R. W. Sanders described the committee as "unelected" with power to "effectively run our country" and possibly issue budget cuts that would "basically go unchallenged." [29] Senator Bob Menendez predicted that the committee would become deadlocked with a "stacked deck" of members opposed to new revenues. [6] An analysis in the New York Times described the committee as similar to other "blue-ribbon panels" established during the past seventy years as a way to "give political cover to policy makers to make unpopular changes"; in most past cases Congress has ignored the panel proposals or procrastinated enacting them. [6] A future Congress could override any decisions made, since one Congress cannot "bind another." [6] [30] A variety of watchdog groups, including Public Campaign and MoveOn.org, were concerned that lobbyists would influence the proceedings, and asked that lawmakers disclose meetings with lobbyists and refrain from political fundraising during the selection process. [31] Standard & Poor's was pessimistic at the outset regarding the chance for serious fiscal reform; the agency downgraded the nation's credit rating from AAA to AA+, writing:

... The downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges ... (we are) pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon. The outlook on the long-term rating is negative.

— Standard & Poor's, August 2011 [32]

Analyst Fareed Zakaria predicted the committee would deadlock without a majority favoring a specific plan, [30] writing:

It's a punt. I mean, it's one more occasion where Congress has basically punted, kicked the can down the road, use what metaphor you want. It cuts $21 billion out of the 2012 budget, which is the only budget over which this Congress actually has any authority ... The Democrats are saying no cuts to entitlements. The Republicans are saying no taxes. That's great except we all know the only solution to our long-term debt problem is cuts in entitlements and new taxes. [30]

Impasse and failure

The initial proposal from the Democrats on the committee offered 3 trillion in deficit reduction, including 1.3 trillion in new revenue and 400 billion in Medicare savings, but was rejected on partisan lines for the level of tax increases. The Republican Toomey plan proposed 1.2 trillion in deficit reduction, including 300 billion in new revenue, but was rejected because it lowered the top marginal tax rate from 35% to 28%. [33]

The final agreement would have needed to undergo a 48-hour vetting period by the Congressional Budget Office before being presented to Congress. After financial markets closed on Monday November 21, 2011, the committee issued a statement that it had failed to reach agreement. [4] This failure despite the extraordinary conditions under which the committee operated was viewed by both sides as a missed opportunity and a triumph of political ideology over genuine leadership. An ORC International poll conducted November 11–13 reports that 19% of respondents would hold both parties responsible for failure to reach an agreement; 32% of respondents thought Democrats would have a greater responsibility, and 42% Republicans (±3%). [34] A Quinnipiac University Polling Institute poll conducted November 14–20 indicates that voters blamed the looming impasse on Congressional Republicans 44% to 38% (±1.9%) over President Obama and Congressional Democrats. [35] [36] A Gallup poll conducted on November 21 after the announcement finds that 55% apportioned blame equally to the Republicans and the Democrats on the committee, with 24% blaming the Republican members more and 15% blaming the Democratic members more (±4%). [37]

Committee co-chair Jeb Hensarling blamed Democratic committee members for insisting on "a minimum of $1 trillion in higher taxes" and unwillingness to agree to "structural reforms" to health-care entitlement programs. [38] Jon Kyl framed the failure as a question of the scope and size of the government and whether the deficit could best be dealt with by increased taxes or by increased economic growth. [39] Pat Toomey called his proposal a "genuine compromise" that included increased tax revenues by reforming and simplifying the tax code, as well as spending reductions. [40] The Republican presidential candidates have each stated that deficit reduction should not include any tax increases. [41] Phil Kerpen of Americans for Prosperity celebrated the impasse as preventing a "poorly-timed tax hike". [42] Republicans have also criticized Obama for his hands-off approach; the president was out of the country during the final week of negotiations. [36] [41]

Committee co-chair Patty Murray blamed Republican committee members for insisting that the "wealthiest Americans and biggest corporations be protected from paying a penny more" at the expense of the middle class. [43] John Kerry put the blame on "the Republican insistence on making tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans permanent", referring to the Bush tax cuts due to expire in 2013. [44] Nancy Pelosi blamed Republican rejection of a "balanced approach", and Harry Reid put the point of no compromise on the Republican proposal to privatize Medicare. [39] Former Secretary of Defense William Cohen outlined the likely consequences of sequester to the defense budget, calling on Congressional Republicans to choose between "rigid antitax ideology" and national defense. [45]

Aftermath

Deficit reduction and the automatic cuts scheduled to take effect in January 2013 were viewed as likely to figure in the 2012 presidential election. [36] [46] President Obama stated that he would veto any attempt by Congress to cancel the $1.2 trillion sequester. [47] These sequestrations figured prominently in the United States fiscal cliff discussions starting in 2012. [48]

US financial markets largely anticipated the failure of the committee, leaving little room to fall following the announcement. The Dow was down 2.1% on the day of the announcement, and the NASDAQ and S&P 500 were each down 1.9%. Yield on ten year treasuries fell to 1.96% on increased demand for stable investments. [46] [49] [50] [51] Credit rating agencies maintained their projections for US sovereign debt. Standard & Poor's affirmed their AA+ rating; the agency had downgraded the country's credit rating in August 2011, citing Congressional resistance to new revenue measures and fears that the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 might not be allowed to expire. [36] [52] Moody's affirmed a rating of AAA with a negative outlook. [36] [53] Fitch Ratings affirmed its AAA rating but revised their outlook to negative, citing "declining confidence that timely fiscal measures necessary to place U.S. public finances on a sustainable path ... will be forthcoming." [54] [55]

Following the announcement that the committee had failed to reach agreement, a group of government watchdog organizations posted an open letter to President Obama and ranking members of Congress calling for the release of committee working documents. It argues that the proposals could serve the public interest by providing a basis for public debate going forward. The group comprised Taxpayers for Common Sense, the Project On Government Oversight, the Sunlight Foundation, OpenSecrets, Citizens Against Government Waste, The Heartland Institute, and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. [56] [57] Except for the five public hearings, the committee proceedings comprising the majority of the negotiations and counter-offers will remain sealed for 20 years under current rules. [58] [59]

Related Research Articles

A balanced budget amendment or debt brake is a constitutional rule requiring that a state cannot spend more than its income. It requires a balance between the projected receipts and expenditures of the government.

Budget reconciliation is a special parliamentary procedure of the United States Congress set up to expedite the passage of certain federal budget legislation in the Senate. The procedure overrides the Senate's filibuster rules, which may otherwise require a 60-vote supermajority for passage. Bills described as reconciliation bills can pass the Senate by a simple majority of 51 votes or 50 votes plus the vice president's as the tie-breaker. The reconciliation procedure also applies to the House of Representatives, but it has minor significance there, as the rules of the House of Representatives do not have a de facto supermajority requirement. Because of greater polarization, gridlock, and filibustering in the Senate in recent years, budget reconciliation has come to play an important role in how the United States Congress legislates.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993</span>

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993 was a federal law that was enacted by the 103rd United States Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on August 10, 1993. It has also been unofficially referred to as the Deficit Reduction Act of 1993. Part XIII of the law is also called the Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States federal budget</span> Budget of the U.S. federal government

The United States budget comprises the spending and revenues of the U.S. federal government. The budget is the financial representation of the priorities of the government, reflecting historical debates and competing economic philosophies. The government primarily spends on healthcare, retirement, and defense programs. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office provides extensive analysis of the budget and its economic effects. CBO estimated in February 2024 that Federal debt held by the public is projected to rise from 99 percent of GDP in 2024 to 116 percent in 2034 and would continue to grow if current laws generally remained unchanged. Over that period, the growth of interest costs and mandatory spending outpaces the growth of revenues and the economy, driving up debt. Those factors persist beyond 2034, pushing federal debt higher still, to 172 percent of GDP in 2054.

The phrase Bush tax cuts refers to changes to the United States tax code passed originally during the presidency of George W. Bush and extended during the presidency of Barack Obama, through:

The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform was a bipartisan Presidential Commission on deficit reduction, created in 2010 by President Barack Obama to identify "policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run". The 18-member Commission, consisting of 12 members of Congress and six private citizens, first met on April 27, 2010. A report was released on December 1, recommending a combination of spending cuts and tax increases.

The 2012 United States federal budget was the budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year 2012, which lasted from October 1, 2011 through September 30, 2012. The original spending request was issued by President Barack Obama in February 2011. That April, the Republican-held House of Representatives announced a competing plan, The Path to Prosperity, emboldened by a major victory in the 2010 Congressional elections associated with the Tea Party movement. The budget plans were both intended to focus on deficit reduction, but differed in their changes to taxation, entitlement programs, defense spending, and research funding.

In 2011, ongoing political debate in the United States Congress about the appropriate level of government spending and its effect on the national debt and deficit reached a crisis centered on raising the debt ceiling, leading to the passage of the Budget Control Act of 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Budget Control Act of 2011</span> United States law

The Budget Control Act of 2011 is a federal statute enacted by the 112th United States Congress and signed into law by US President Barack Obama on August 2, 2011. The Act brought conclusion to the 2011 US debt-ceiling crisis.

The 1996 United States federal budget is the United States federal budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year 1996, which was October 1995 – September 1996. This budget was the first to be submitted after the Republican Revolution in the 1994 midterm elections. Disagreements between Democratic President Bill Clinton and Republicans led by Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich resulted in the United States federal government shutdown of 1995 and 1996.

The 2013 United States federal budget is the budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year 2013, which began on October 1, 2012, and ended on September 30, 2013. The original spending request was issued by President Barack Obama in February 2012.

Political debates about the United States federal budget discusses some of the more significant U.S. budgetary debates of the 21st century. These include the causes of debt increases, the impact of tax cuts, specific events such as the United States fiscal cliff, the effectiveness of stimulus, and the impact of the Great Recession, among others. The article explains how to analyze the U.S. budget as well as the competing economic schools of thought that support the budgetary positions of the major parties.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deficit reduction in the United States</span> Economic policy debate

Deficit reduction in the United States refers to taxation, spending, and economic policy debates and proposals designed to reduce the federal government budget deficit. Government agencies including the Government Accountability Office (GAO), Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the U.S. Treasury Department have reported that the federal government is facing a series of important long-run financing challenges, mainly driven by an aging population, rising healthcare costs per person, and rising interest payments on the national debt.

The United States fiscal cliff refers to the combined effect of several previously-enacted laws that came into effect simultaneously in January 2013, increasing taxes and decreasing spending.

Budget sequestration is a provision of United States law that causes an across-the-board reduction in certain kinds of spending included in the federal budget. Sequestration involves setting a hard cap on the amount of government spending within broadly defined categories; if Congress enacts annual appropriations legislation that exceeds these caps, an across-the-board spending cut is automatically imposed on these categories, affecting all departments and programs by an equal percentage. The amount exceeding the budget limit is held back by the Treasury and not transferred to the agencies specified in the appropriation bills. The word sequestration was derived from a legal term referring to the seizing of property by an agent of the court, to prevent destruction or harm, while any dispute over said property is resolved in court.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012</span> Federal law in the United States changing taxation, "ATRA".

The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 (ATRA) was enacted and passed by the United States Congress on January 1, 2013, and was signed into law by US President Barack Obama the next day. ATRA gave permanence to the lower rates of much of the "Bush tax cuts".

As a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011, a set of automatic spending cuts to United States federal government spending in particular of outlays were initially set to begin on January 1, 2013. They were postponed by two months by the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 until March 1 when this law went into effect.

The 2014 United States federal budget is the budget to fund government operations for the fiscal year (FY) 2014, which began on October 1, 2013 and ended on September 30, 2014.

In January 2013, the United States reached the, at the time, debt ceiling of $16.394 trillion that had been enacted following a crisis in 2011. President Obama and members of the Democratic Party proposed raising the debt ceiling, with some advocating for its complete dismissal. Members of the Republican Party staunchly opposed raising the debt ceiling unless spending cuts would parallel the bill, including defunding the Affordable Care Act. Previous raises of the debt ceiling have been largely bipartisan without conditions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2018 United States federal budget</span>

The United States federal budget for fiscal year 2018, which ran from October 1, 2017, to September 30, 2018, was named America First: A Budget Blueprint to Make America Great Again. It was the first budget proposed by newly elected president Donald Trump, submitted to the 115th Congress on March 16, 2017.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  112–25 (text) (PDF), Title IV
  2. ↑ Silverleib, Alan; Cohen, Tom (July 31, 2011). "White House, congressional leaders reach debt deal". CNN Politics. Archived from the original on January 2, 2013. Retrieved August 5, 2011. ... frustration over partisan political wrangling that threatened further economic harm to an already struggling recovery.
  3. 1 2 3 DeFrank, Thomas (July 31, 2011). "President Obama says Republican, Dem leaders have reached agreement with him to raise debt ceiling". New York Daily News . Archived from the original on November 24, 2011.
  4. 1 2 "Statement from Co-Chairs of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction". deficitreduction.gov. November 21, 2011. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  5. ↑ Section 401(d) of the Budget Control Act of 2011, 2 U.S.C. § 900 note
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Pear, Robert; Rampell, Catherine (August 1, 2011). "Lawmakers in Both Parties Fear That New Budget Panel Will Erode Authority". The New York Times. Retrieved August 5, 2011. Lawmakers from both parties expressed scorn on Monday for a central feature of the deficit-reduction deal that creates a powerful 12-member committee of Congress to recommend major changes in entitlement programs and the tax code. ...
  7. ↑ Walker, Molly Bernhart (August 9, 2011). "Backgrounder: Super Congress". FierceGovernment. Retrieved August 10, 2011.
  8. ↑ "Makeup of deficit-reduction 'supercommittee' set". usatoday.com. August 11, 2011. Retrieved August 30, 2011.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Brownstein, Ronald (August 5, 2011). "Bold Is Beautiful: The Super Committee Offers a Glimmer of Hope". National Journal .
  10. 1 2 3 Times' Opinion staff (August 4, 2011). "Deficit reduction: Who matters now in Washington?". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 5, 2011. That means the most important players will be the four people picking the 12 lawmakers who'll be conducting those talks: Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) in the House, and Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) in the Senate.
  11. ↑ Weigel, David (July 30, 2011). "Don't Worry, It Gets Worse". Slate Magazine. Retrieved August 5, 2011. Members of the panel, the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, will be named within two weeks and will have until Nov. 23 to recommend cuts. If it fails to reach agreement or if Congress and the president kill its recommendations, $1.2 trillion in cuts would be implemented automatically.
  12. ↑ "Nine spots left to be filled on deficit-reduction 'super committee'". CNN. August 9, 2011. Retrieved August 10, 2011. Reid said in a statement that Murray was tapped to co-chair the committee. 'As the events of the past week have made clear, the world is watching the work of this committee. I am confident that Senators Murray, Baucus and Kerry will bring the thoughtfulness, bipartisanship and commitment to a balanced approach that will produce the best outcome for the American people,' he said.
  13. ↑ "Boehner names his 'super committee' trio". MSNBC.com. August 10, 2011. Archived from the original on August 11, 2011. Retrieved August 10, 2011.
  14. ↑ Madison, Lucy (August 11, 2011). "Pelosi reveals "super committee" picks". CBS News.
  15. ↑ Riley, Charles (August 11, 2011). "Super committee: Who are these guys?". CNNMoney.com . CNN. Retrieved August 11, 2011.
  16. ↑ Muskal, Michael (August 1, 2011). "CBO confirms that debt-ceiling plan would cut $2.1 trillion". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 5, 2011. The second step in the process would come from the Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, a special congressional committee that would be mandated with finding $1.5 trillion in spending cuts. If the committee fails to find that amount, there would be an automatic trigger chopping $1.2 trillion. The budget office used the smaller figure to reach the $2.1 trillion total.
  17. 1 2 3 Pear, Robert (August 4, 2011). "Bush tax cuts loom as next battleground in fight over deficit". Boston Globe. Retrieved August 5, 2011. Congressional leaders say this panel has a better chance than many of its predecessors because the debt deal creates a strong incentive for bipartisan agreement: If the committee fails to agree or to win approval for a plan from the House and the Senate, the government will automatically cut at least $1.2 trillion over 10 years from hundreds of military and nonmilitary programs.
  18. ↑ Wessel, David (August 3, 2011). "Can the Super Committee Raise Taxes or Not?". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved August 5, 2011. The Budget Control Act says: "The goal of the joint committee shall be to reduce the deficit by at least $1.5 trillion over the period of fiscal years 2012 to 2021." It also says that the Congressional Budget Office shall provide estimates of the impact of the committee's proposal s that are based on current law, and, under current law, all the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of 2012.
  19. ↑ Sterling, Gene (August 2011). "Baselines and Balance". whitehouse.gov . Retrieved August 31, 2011– via National Archives.
  20. ↑ Rampell, Catherine (August 4, 2011). "In Need of Deficit Plan, Congress Opts for Several". New York Times. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  21. ↑ Hook, Janet; Naftali Bendavid (November 22, 2011). "Deficit Panel Folds Its Tent". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  22. ↑ "Organizational Meeting". United States Congress Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  23. ↑ "Hearing on The History and Drivers of Our Nation's Debt and Its Threats". United States Congress Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  24. ↑ "Hearing - Overview: Revenue Options and Reforming the Tax Code". United States Congress Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  25. ↑ "Hearing - Overview: Discretionary Outlays, Security and Non-Security". United States Congress Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  26. ↑ "Hearing - Overview of Previous Debt Proposals". United States Congress Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction. Retrieved May 24, 2012.
  27. ↑ Raju, Manu; Allen, Jonathan (August 2, 2011). "Debt ceiling debate has lawmakers tired of last-minute jam". Politico .
  28. ↑ ""Super Congress" is Most Disturbing Component of the Debt Deal". Business Insider. August 3, 2011. Retrieved August 5, 2011. This guarantees that Members will face tremendous pressure to vote for whatever comes out of this commission.
  29. ↑ Sanders, R. W. (August 2, 2011). "The Super Congress We Did Not Elect". Huffington Post. Retrieved August 5, 2011. I don't remember ever having elected a Super Congress. However, apparently there will be a committee of twelve that will effectively run our country. This "Super Congress" of twelve will recommend cuts that will basically go unchallenged. ...
  30. 1 2 3 Zakaria, Fareed (August 4, 2011). "Zakaria: Super committee will likely deadlock". CNN World. Archived from the original on April 4, 2012. Retrieved August 5, 2011. No. It's a punt. I mean, it's one more occasion where Congress has basically punted, kicked the can down the road, use what metaphor you want. It cuts $21 billion out of the 2012 budget, which is the only budget over which this Congress actually has any authority.
  31. ↑ Schouten, Fredreka (August 4, 2011). "Groups: Limit lobbying of deficit committee". USA Today. Retrieved August 5, 2011. Congressional leaders haven't picked the 12 members of the uniquely powerful "super-committee" that will recommend $1.5 trillion in spending cuts to reduce the deficit, but watchdog groups want to limit the influence of industry lobbyists on their work.
  32. ↑ "S & P statement on U.S. debt downgrade". CBS News. August 5, 2011. Retrieved August 5, 2011. Standard & Poor's issued a statement Friday about their downgrade of U.S. debt ...
  33. ↑ "US 'super-committee' fails to reach deficit deal". BBC. November 21, 2012. Retrieved January 6, 2012.
  34. ↑ "CNN-ORC poll November 11–13" (PDF). ORC International. Retrieved December 17, 2011. If the supercommittee does not agree on a deficit reduction plan, do you think that the Democrats in Congress or the Republicans in Congress would be more responsible for that?
  35. ↑ "November 21, 2011 - U.S. Voters Say Almost 3-1 Super Committee Will Fail, Quinnipiac University National Poll Finds; More Blame Republicans". Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. Retrieved December 14, 2011. Who do you think would be mostly to blame if the Committee and the President are not able to agree on a plan to reduce the deficit, President Obama and the Democrats in Congress, or the Republicans in Congress?
  36. 1 2 3 4 5 Dorning, Mike (November 22, 2011). "Both Parties Set to Use Failure of Debt Deal for 2012 Campaign". Bloomberg. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  37. ↑ Jones, Jeffrey M. (November 22, 2011). "Americans Blame Both Sides of "Supercommittee" for Failure". The Gallup Organization. Retrieved December 17, 2011.
  38. ↑ Hensarling, Jeb (November 22, 2011). "Why the Super Committee Failed". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  39. 1 2 Dodge, Catherine; Kathleen Hunter (November 21, 2011). "U.S. Supercommittee Fails to Reach Agreement as Across-the-Board Cuts Loom". Bloomberg. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  40. ↑ Toomey, Pat (December 8, 2011). "Lawmaker recounts experience on 'super committee'". The Times Leader. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  41. 1 2 Kuhnhenn, Jim (November 23, 2011). "Supercommittee failure complicates election year". Businessweek. Archived from the original on November 24, 2011. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  42. ↑ Kerpen, Phil (November 21, 2011). "Why the Super Committee Deadlock Is a Victory, Not a Failure". Fox News. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  43. ↑ Murray, Patty. "Deficit-reduction chair says she's not done working for compromise" . Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  44. ↑ Kerry, John (November 21, 2011). "Kerry on Debt Panel Outcome". press release. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  45. ↑ Cohen, William S. (November 21, 2011). "Republicans Are Endangering National Security". New York Times. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  46. 1 2 Fontevecchia, Agustino (November 21, 2011). "Deficit Supercommittee Officially Admits Failure". Forbes. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  47. ↑ Obama, Barack. "President Obama Makes a Statement about the Supercommittee". whitehouse.gov . Retrieved December 14, 2011– via National Archives.
  48. ↑ Calmes, Jackie (May 22, 2012). "Recession Possible if Impasse Persists, Budget Office Says". The New York Times Company. Retrieved August 4, 2012.
  49. ↑ "The last best hope: With the deficit-reduction committee's failure, American fiscal policy is drifting in a dangerous direction". The Economist. November 26, 2011. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  50. ↑ Davis, Marc (November 29, 2011). "What The Failure Of The Supercommittee Means". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  51. ↑ Hudson, John (November 21, 2011). "Why Markets Are Spooked Today". The Atlantic Wire. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  52. ↑ "United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative" (PDF). Standard & Poor's. August 5, 2011. Retrieved May 31, 2012.
  53. ↑ "Moody's: US Rating Unaffected by Deficit Committee Outcome". Moody's. November 23, 2011. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  54. ↑ "Fitch Affirms United States at AAA; Outlook Revised to Negative". Fitch Ratings. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  55. ↑ Neumann, Jeannette; Matt Phillips (November 28, 2011). "Fitch Cuts Its Outlook on U.S. Credit". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
  56. ↑ "open letter calling for the release of supercommittee working documents" (PDF). December 5, 2011. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  57. ↑ Kim, Seung Min (December 5, 2011). "Will supercommittee release its secrets?". Politico. Retrieved December 9, 2011.
  58. ↑ Lardner, Richard. "Debt-reduction 'supercommittee' Hid in Plain Sight". Salon. Retrieved January 30, 2012.
  59. ↑ Chaddock, Gail Russell (November 21, 2011). "Three days left: why debt super committee is poised to throw in the towel". Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved December 14, 2011.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.