Who Paid the Piper?

Last updated
Who Paid the Piper?
Author Frances Stonor Saunders
LanguageEnglish
Publication date
1999

Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War (U.S. title The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters) is a 1999 book by Frances Stonor Saunders. The book discusses the mid-20th century Central Intelligence Agency efforts to infiltrate and co-opt artistic movements using funds that were mostly channelled through the Congress for Cultural Freedom and the Ford Foundation. The aim of these efforts was to combat the political influence of the Soviet Union and expand American political influence. [1] [2] Saunders concluded that by entangling the state in "free" artistic expression, the CIA undermined America's moral position in comparison to the Soviet Union. [3] In Dissent Jeffrey C. Isaac wrote that the book is a "widely discussed retrospective on post-Second World War liberalism that raises important questions about the relationships between intellectuals and political power." [4]

Contents

The British edition, titled Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War, was published in 1999 by Granta Books (London). [5] The American edition, titled The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters, was published in 2000 by The New Press. [6] Josef Joffe, in a book review written for The New York Times , described the American title as being "more neutral". [2] Paul Roazen, in The Sewanee Review , described the British title as being "more provocative". [7]

Saunders concluded that the activities of the U.S. were similar to those of the Soviet Union. [8] [3]

Content

Saunders writes that the CIA secretly subsidised the European tours of the Boston Symphony Orchestra and the films 1984 and Animal Farm . It paid for the publication of thousands of books, including by the publisher Frederick A. Praeger and Yugoslav dissident Milovan Djilas. It financed the Partisan Review and The Kenyon Review . Saunders focuses on the creation, activities, and downfalls of the Congress for Cultural Freedom and its the journal Encounter . The book describes how the CIA set up fake foundations and used established bodies such as the Ford Foundation and the Rockefeller Foundation, to hide its funding of the Congress for Cultural Freedom and its other covert activities. [6]

Reception

The book received media attention after its publication and The New York Times , Organization of American Historians 2000, Arthur Schlesinger Jr., and other former CCF participants focused attention on the book after its American release. [9] Left-wing publications such as Monthly Review and The Nation gave the book a positive reception, while right-wing publications such as The American Spectator and National Interest gave the book a negative reception. [4] The book won the Guardian First Book Award. [10] [11]

Edward Said wrote that the book is "a major work of investigative history, an extremely valuable contribution to the all-important post-World War Two record" and that "the gist of her argument about Abstract Expressionism and its uses as propaganda is correct, if not wholly original". He said that "[t]he dispiriting truth it reveals, or confirms, is that few of 'our' major intellectual and cultural figures resisted the blandishments of the CIA". [12] He added that some of the information in the book is not "complete" or "fully accurate", in particular the chapter discussing the CIA infiltrating organisations. [12]

The Baumols concluded that the book has a lot of detail which is not necessary for Saunders' arguments and repetition that "gives the reader a sense of wallowing through a dense landscape, looking for the fascinating nuggets of history that are certainly there." [13] The Baumols argued that, based on the contents of the book, the CIA had a "surprisingly benign" impact, in contradiction with what they believed Saunders would conclude, [14] and that the book "suggests that [the CIA's] role in the arts was considerably less damaging than might reasonably have been feared." [13]

Paul Buhle of Brown University described Who Paid the Piper? as being the "most spectacular" book recently released about the involvement of CIA and intellectuals; Buhle stated that compared to Freiheit in der Offensive? by Michael Hochgeschwender, Who Paid the Piper? has fewer footnotes but more "charisma" and "verve". [9]

Gow wrote that even though the author had a negative attitude towards the CIA activities, the book has a "triumph" since "she shows men like [CIA employee Tom Braden, who headed the program] to have been unsung heroes of the Cold War, as well as masters of art in both cultural warfare and cultural appreciation." [5]

Jeffrey C. Isaac criticized the book, saying that it was "shrill" and with a "prosecutorial tone," that it had arguments without "nuance," that it did not "grapple in a serious way with the ideas that were the chief currency of those it purports to study", and that it did not consider the importance and the need to secure "liberal values and institutions". [4]

Jeremy Isaacs in The Spectator wrote that the book has portions that are humorous, citing reactions to figures who learned that they were subsidised by the CIA. He concluded that it was a "hammer-blow of a book". [15]

Joffe criticised the book for equating the U.S. propaganda efforts with those from the USSR in a "a strident anti-anti-Communism that refuses to accord the Western cause the moral worth it deserves, considering the wares the totalitarians were hawking." [2] He characterized the book as having "careless sourcing" and "ad hominem slurs". [2]

Roazen described the book as "highly readable" and "fascinating". [7]

Mary Carroll of Booklist described the book as having a "European point of view". [16] William and Hilda Baumol, in their book review, wrote that Saunders "generally avoids explicit judgments, seeking to be dispassionate in her account." [14] James Gow of King's College, London stated that Saunders had a negative tone towards the CIA activities and a "churlish attitude". [5]

Reviewing the book for Studies in Intelligence , former CIA official historian Thomas M. Troy Jr. wrote "Saunders deserves praise for presenting opposing views" and that she did "a fine job in recounting the intriguing story of how the CIA worked with existing institutions", but added that the book "has some major shortcomings" and "contains some silly mistakes and some real gaffes". Troy stated that Saunders "repeatedly returns to the theme that the CIA injured the cause of intellectual freedom by clandestinely supporting (oh, irony of ironies!) champions of intellectual freedom." Touching on what he perceived to be the books shortcomings, he wrote "despite Saunders's assertions that the CIA undermined intellectual freedom, she does not present any examples of people whose intellectual growth was stunted or impaired because of the Agency's programs" and mentioned that she failed to substantial discuss Soviet actions during the Cold War that would have helped readers to understand those of the CIA. While taking issue with the book's content and conclusions, Troy summarized "I highly enjoyed and strongly recommend her book". [6]

See also

Related Research Articles

<i>Partisan Review</i> American magazine covering literature, politics and cultural commentary (1934-2003)

Partisan Review (PR) was a small-circulation quarterly "little magazine" dealing with literature, politics, and cultural commentary published in New York City. The magazine was launched in 1934 by the Communist Party USA–affiliated John Reed Club of New York and was initially part of the Communist political orbit. Growing disaffection on the part of PR's primary editors began to make itself felt, and the magazine abruptly suspended publication in the fall of 1936. When the magazine reemerged late in 1937, it came with additional editors and new writers who advanced a political line deeply critical of Joseph Stalin's Soviet Union.

Operation Mockingbird is an alleged large-scale program of the United States Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) that began in the early years of the Cold War and attempted to manipulate domestic American news media organizations for propaganda purposes. According to author Deborah Davis, Operation Mockingbird recruited leading American journalists into a propaganda network and influenced the operations of front groups. CIA support of front groups was exposed when an April 1967 Ramparts article reported that the National Student Association received funding from the CIA. In 1975, Church Committee Congressional investigations revealed Agency connections with journalists and civic groups.

The Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF) was an anti-communist propaganda group founded on June 26, 1950 in West Berlin, and was supported by the Central Intelligence Agency and its allies. At its height, the CCF was active in thirty-five countries. In 1966 it was revealed that the CIA was instrumental in the establishment and funding of the group. The congress aimed to enlist intellectuals and opinion makers in a war of ideas against communism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Matthiessen</span> American novelist

Peter Matthiessen was an American novelist, naturalist, wilderness writer, zen teacher and onetime CIA agent. A co-founder of the literary magazine The Paris Review, he was the only writer to have won the National Book Award in both nonfiction and fiction. He was also a prominent environmental activist.

Nicola Chiaromonte was an Italian activist and writer. In 1934 he fled Italy for France, after opposing Benito Mussolini's fascist government. In Paris he contributed to Giustizia e Libertà. During the Spanish Civil War, he flew in André Malraux's squadron, fighting against fascist supported General Francisco Franco. The character of Scali in Malraux's novel Man's Hope is based on Chiaromonte. After moving to New York in 1941, he took on an important role in the leftist anti-Stalinist intellectual scene of the period, writing for The Nation, The New Republic, politics and Partisan Review. During the Cold War, he helped found, and served as editor, for the Italian journal Tempo Presente, which was published by the Congress for Cultural Freedom. Mary McCarthy was a close friend during his time in the US. A foreword to the 1985 edition of Chiaromonte's book of essays The Paradox of History (1970) was written by Joseph Frank, a noted Dostoyevsky scholar.

Encounter was a literary magazine founded in 1953 by poet Stephen Spender and journalist Irving Kristol. The magazine ceased publication in 1991. Published in the United Kingdom, it was an Anglo-American intellectual and cultural journal, originally associated with the anti-Stalinist left. The magazine received covert funding from the Central Intelligence Agency who, along with MI6, discussed the founding of an "Anglo-American left-of-centre publication" intended to counter the idea of Cold War neutralism. The magazine was rarely critical of American foreign policy and generally shaped its content to support the geopolitical interests of the United States government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Melvin J. Lasky</span> American journalist

Melvin Jonah Lasky was an American journalist, intellectual, and member of the anti-Communist left. He founded the German journal Der Monat in 1948 and, from 1958 to 1991, edited Encounter, one of many journals revealed to have been secretly funded by the CIA through the Congress for Cultural Freedom (CCF).

Basil Kingsley Martin usually known as Kingsley Martin, was a British journalist who edited the left-leaning political magazine the New Statesman from 1930 to 1960.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tom Braden</span> American CIA official and journalist (1917-2009)

Thomas Wardell Braden was an American CIA official, journalist, and co-host of the CNN show Crossfire.

Frances Hélène Jeanne Stonor Saunders FRSL is a British journalist and historian.

At various times, under its own initiative or in accordance with directives from the President of the United States or the National Security Council staff, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) has attempted to influence public opinion both in the United States and abroad.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CIA and the Cultural Cold War</span> Propaganda campaigns waged by both the United States and the Soviet Union

Cultural Cold War refers to propaganda campaigns waged by both the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, with each country promoting their own culture, arts, literature, and music. In addition, less overtly, their opposing political choices and ideologies at the expense of the other. Many of the battles were fought in Europe or in European Universities, with Communist Party leaders depicting the United States as a cultural black hole while pointing to their own cultural heritage as proof that they were the inheritors of the European Enlightenment. The U.S. responded by accusing the Soviets of "disregarding the inherent value of culture," and subjugating art to the controlling policies of a totalitarian political system, even as they felt saddled with the responsibility of preserving and fostering western civilization's best cultural traditions, given the many European artists who took refuge in the United States before, during, and after World War II.

The Committee for Cultural Freedom (CCF) was an American political organization active from 1939 to 1951 which advocated opposition to the totalitarianism of both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany in foreign affairs, and promoted pro-democratic reforms in public and private institutions domestically. Co-founded by influential philosopher and educator John Dewey and the anti-Soviet Marxist academic Sidney Hook, it was reorganized in January 1951 into the American Committee for Cultural Freedom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crusade for Freedom</span> US propaganda and public radio fundraising campaign

The Crusade for Freedom was an American propaganda campaign operating from 1950–1960. Its public goal was to raise funds for Radio Free Europe; it also served to conceal the CIA's funding of Radio Free Europe and to generate domestic support for American Cold War policies.

The anti-Stalinist left is a term that refers to various kinds of Marxist political movements that oppose Joseph Stalin, Stalinism, Neo-Stalinism and the system of governance that Stalin implemented as leader of the Soviet Union between 1924 and 1953. This term also refers to the high ranking political figures and governmental programs that opposed Joseph Stalin and his form of communism, such as Leon Trotsky and other traditional Marxists within the Left Opposition.

Michael Josselson was a CIA agent.

<i>Hiwar</i> (magazine) Arabic magazine funded by the CIA in Lebanon (1962–1967)

Hiwar was an Arabic magazine published in Beirut between 1962 and 1967. The magazine was established and financed by the CIA during the cultural Cold War, under the cover of a front organization, the Congress for Cultural Freedom.

John Anderson Thompson, Jr. was an American professor, poet, literary critic and writer whose literary career spanned sixty years, from 1938 to 1998.

Preuves was a French language monthly political and cultural magazine which existed between 1951 and 1975 and was headquartered in Paris, France. It was the first publication launched by the Congress for Cultural Freedom which later started other magazines, including Cuadernos, Encounter, Survey, Tempo Presente and Der Monat.

Cuadernos was a Spanish-language magazine that was published in Paris, France, in the period 1953–1965. Its full title was Cuadernos del Congreso por la Libertad de la Cultura. It was one of the publications of the Congress for Cultural Freedom.

References

Notes

  1. Petras, James. "The CIA and the Cultural Cold War Revisited" (Archive). Monthly Review . November 1, 1999. Retrieved on April 18, 2015.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Joffe, Josef. "America's Secret Weapon" (Archive). The New York Times . April 23, 2000. Retrieved on April 18, 2015.
  3. 1 2 Draper, p. 17. "Stonor Saunders herself argues that in funding the Congress, the United States government put itself into a position very similar to that of its Soviet counterpart."
  4. 1 2 3 Isaac, p. 29.
  5. 1 2 3 Gow, p. 848.
  6. 1 2 3 Troy Jr., Thomas M. (2002). "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters". Studies in Intelligence . Washington, D.C.: Central Intelligence Agency: Center for the Study of Intelligence. 46 (1). Archived from the original on June 13, 2007. Retrieved May 29, 2020.
  7. 1 2 Roazen, p. cxii.
  8. Saunders, p. 129. "With this kind of commitment, the CIA was effectively acting as America's Ministry of Culture."
  9. 1 2 Buhle, p. 1153.
  10. "Books: Guardian First Book Award: Who Paid the Piper: The CIA and the Cultural Cold War, by Frances Stonor Saunders." (Guardian Saturday Pages). The Guardian , September 25, 1999, p.11.
  11. "The Guardian First Book Award." The Guardian. Friday August 27, 1999. p. 10.
  12. 1 2 Said, Edward (1999). "Hey, Mister, you want dirty book?". London Review of Books . 21 (19): 54–56. (Archive) - Paid access needed for entire article. Archived link includes excerpt and letters to the editor discussing this review, including one from Saunders.
  13. 1 2 Baumol and Baumol, p. 75.
  14. 1 2 Baumol and Baumol, p. 73.
  15. Isaacs.
  16. Carroll, p. 1506.

Further reading

  1. Romano, Carlin. "Cold-War Cultural Tactics Should Be a Hot Topic." The Chronicle of Higher Education , March 3, 2006, Vol.52(26)
  2. Sharlet, Jeff. "Tinker, writer, artist, spy: intellectuals during the Cold War." The Chronicle of Higher Education , March 31, 2000, Vol.46(30), p.A19(2)
  3. Wreszin, Michael. "The Cultural Cold War: The CIA and the World of Arts and Letters. (Review)" Reviews in American History , Dec, 2000, Vol.28(4), p. 607-614
  4. Saunders, Frances Stonor. "Modern art was CIA 'weapon'" (Archive). The Independent . Sunday 22 October 1995.