Zero-length launch

Last updated
A USAF F-100D Super Sabre using a zero-length-launch system F-100 zero-length-launch trial.jpg
A USAF F-100D Super Sabre using a zero-length-launch system

The zero-length launch system or zero-length take-off system (ZLL, ZLTO, ZEL, ZELL) was a method whereby jet fighters and attack aircraft could be near-vertically launched using rocket motors to rapidly gain speed and altitude. Such rocket boosters were limited to a short-burn duration, being typically solid-fuel and suitable for only a single use, being intended to drop away once expended.

Contents

The majority of ZELL experiments, which including the conversion of several front-line combat aircraft for trialling the system, occurred during the 1950s amid the formative years of the Cold War. As envisioned, the operational use of ZELL would have employed mobile launch platforms to disperse and hide aircraft, reducing their vulnerability in comparison to being centralised around established airbases with well-known locations. While flight testing had proved such systems to be feasible for combat aircraft, no ZELL-configured aircraft were ever used operationally. The emergence of ever-capable missiles had greatly reduced the strategic necessity of aircraft for the nuclear strike mission, while questions over practicality had also played a role.

History

During the second world war, Germany experimented with the Bachem Ba 349, but due to them losing the war, development was cut short.

According to aviation author Tony Moore, the concept of the zero-length launch system became popular amongst military planners and strategists during the early years of what is now known the Cold War. [1] Conventional aircraft, reliant on large and well-established airbases, were thought to be too easily knocked out in the opening hours of a major conflict between the superpowers, thus the ability to remove this dependence upon lengthy runways and airbases was highly attractive. [1] During the 1950s, various powers began experimenting with a diverse range of methods to launch armed fighter jets, typically using some arrangement of rocket motors. In some concepts, such a fighter could be launched from a trailer from virtually any location, including those that could be camouflaged or otherwise concealed up until the moment of launch. [1]

The primary advantage of a zero-length launch system is the elimination of the historic dependence on vulnerable airfields to facilitate air operations. [2] In the event of a sudden attack, air forces equipped with such systems could field effective air defenses and launch their own airstrikes even with their own airbases having been destroyed by an early nuclear attack. [1] Although launching aircraft using rocket boosters proved to be relatively trouble-free, a runway was still required for these aircraft to be able to land or else be forced to crash. [2] The mobile launching platforms also proved to be expensive to operate and somewhat bulky, typically making them difficult to transport. The security of the mobile launchers themselves would have been a major responsibility in and of itself, especially in the case of such launchers being equipped with nuclear-armed strike fighters. [2]

F-84 during ZELL testing F-84 Thunderjet ZELL.jpg
F-84 during ZELL testing

The United States Air Force, the Bundeswehr's Luftwaffe, and the Soviet VVS all conducted experiments in zero-length launching. The first manned aircraft to be ZELL-launched was an F-84G in 1955. [3] The Soviets' main interest in ZELL was for point defense-format protection of airfields and critical targets using MiG-19s. The American tests with the F-84s started with using the Martin MGM-1 Matador solid-fuel boost motor of some 240 kilonewton (52,000 lbf) thrust output, which burned out seconds after ignition and dropped away from the manned fighter a second or two later. [4] [5] Tests of the larger F-100 Super Sabre and SM-30 (MiG-19) (with the SM-30 using the Soviet-design PRD-22R booster unit) used similar short-burn solid fueled boost motors, albeit of a much more powerful 600 kN (135,000 lbf) thrust-class output levels. [6] [7]

Testing proved that the F-100 was capable of a ZELL launch even while carrying both an external fuel tank and a single nuclear weapon mounted on its hard points. [1] The conceived mission profile would have been for the pilot to have launched a retaliatory nuclear strike against the attacker before attempting to return to any available friendly airbase, or having to eject from the aircraft if a safe landing site could not be reached. [1] Despite the extremely high thrust generated by the rocket motor, the F-100 reportedly subjected its pilot to a maximum of 4g of acceleration forces during the takeoff phase of flight, reaching a speed of roughly 300 mph prior to the rocket motor's depletion. [8] Once all fuel had been exhausted, the rocket motor was intended to slip backwards from its attachment points and drop away from the aircraft. However, testing revealed that this would sometimes fail to detach or cause minor damage to the aircraft's underside when doing so. [9] Despite such difficulties being encountered, the F-100's ZELL system was considered to be feasible, but the idea of its deployment had become less attractive as time went on. [10]

Eventually, all projects involving ZELL aircraft were abandoned, largely due to logistical concerns, as well as the increasing efficiency of guided missiles having rendered the adoption of such aircraft to be less critical in the eyes of strategic planners. [2] Furthermore, the desire to field combat aircraft that lacked any dependence upon relatively vulnerable landing strips had motivated the development of several aircraft capable of either vertical takeoff/landing (VTOL) or short takeoff/landing (STOL) flight profiles; such fighters included production aircraft such as British Hawker Siddeley Harrier and the Soviet Yak-38, as well as experimental prototypes such as the American McDonnell Douglas F-15 STOL/MTD. [2]

ZELMAL (ZEro-length Launch MAt Landing)

The ZELMAL program investigated the possibility of a zero-length landing. The program was conducted 1953 and 1954. It involved a Republic F-84 aircraft and an inflatable rubber mat. The aircraft would perform a zero-length landing by catching an arrester cable with a tailhook, similar to an aircraft carrier landing.

External videos
YouTube 2024.svg
A-10 STORY
Nuvola apps kaboodle.svg ZELMAL rare color footage)

The aircraft would then drop onto the rubber mat. A number of unmanned tests were performed before two piloted ZELMAL tests in 1954. In both cases the pilots suffered spinal injuries. The program was not continued after that. [11]

Manned aircraft involved in ZELL testing

A Lockheed F-104G during tests at Edwards Air Force Base Lockheed F-104G DA 102 ZELL tests Edwards AFB 1963 (mfr LA 3183 via RJF) (16929987577).jpg
A Lockheed F-104G during tests at Edwards Air Force Base

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Missile</span> Self-propelled guided weapon system

A missile is an airborne ranged weapon capable of self-propelled flight aided usually by a propellant, jet engine or rocket motor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">JATO</span> Type of aircraft assisted take-off

JATO is a type of assisted take-off for helping overloaded aircraft into the air by providing additional thrust in the form of small rockets. The term JATO is used interchangeably with the term RATO, for rocket-assisted take-off.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed F-104 Starfighter</span> 1956 fighter aircraft family by Lockheed

The Lockheed F-104 Starfighter is an American single-engine, supersonic interceptor which was extensively deployed as a fighter-bomber during the Cold War. Created as a day fighter by Lockheed as one of the "Century Series" of fighter aircraft for the United States Air Force (USAF), it was developed into an all-weather multirole aircraft in the early 1960s and produced by several other nations, seeing widespread service outside the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Interceptor aircraft</span> Fighter aircraft specializing in the defensive interception of enemy aircraft

An interceptor aircraft, or simply interceptor, is a type of fighter aircraft designed specifically for the defensive interception role against an attacking enemy aircraft, particularly bombers and reconnaissance aircraft. Aircraft that are capable of being or are employed as both "standard" air superiority fighters and as interceptors are sometimes known as fighter-interceptors. There are two general classes of interceptor: light fighters, designed for high performance over short range; and heavy fighters, which are intended to operate over longer ranges, in contested airspace and adverse meteorological conditions. While the second type was exemplified historically by specialized night fighter and all-weather interceptor designs, the integration of mid-air refueling, satellite navigation, on-board radar, and beyond visual range (BVR) missile systems since the 1960s has allowed most frontline fighter designs to fill the roles once reserved for specialized night/all-weather fighters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English Electric Lightning</span> Interceptor aircraft, British, 1960s–1980s

The English Electric Lightning is a British fighter aircraft that served as an interceptor during the 1960s, the 1970s and into the late 1980s. It is capable of a top speed of above Mach 2. The Lightning was designed, developed, and manufactured by English Electric. After EE merged with other aircraft manufacturers to form the British Aircraft Corporation it was marketed as the BAC Lightning. It was operated by the Royal Air Force (RAF), the Kuwait Air Force (KAF), and the Royal Saudi Air Force (RSAF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Convair</span> 1943–1996 American aerospace manufacturer

Convair, previously Consolidated Vultee, was an American aircraft-manufacturing company that later expanded into rockets and spacecraft. The company was formed in 1943 by the merger of Consolidated Aircraft and Vultee Aircraft. In 1953, it was purchased by General Dynamics, and operated as their Convair Division for most of its corporate history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ejection seat</span> Emergency aircraft escape system

In aircraft, an ejection seat or ejector seat is a system designed to rescue the pilot or other crew of an aircraft in an emergency. In most designs, the seat is propelled out of the aircraft by an explosive charge or rocket motor, carrying the pilot with it. The concept of an ejectable escape crew capsule has also been tried. Once clear of the aircraft, the ejection seat deploys a parachute. Ejection seats are common on certain types of military aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republic F-84 Thunderjet</span> 1946 fighter-bomber family

The Republic F-84 Thunderjet is an American turbojet fighter-bomber aircraft. Originating as a 1944 United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) proposal for a "day fighter", the F-84 first flew in 1946. Although it entered service in 1947, the Thunderjet was plagued by so many structural and engine problems that a 1948 U.S. Air Force review declared it unable to execute any aspect of its intended mission and considered canceling the program. The aircraft was not considered fully operational until the 1949 F-84D model and the design matured only with the definitive F-84G introduced in 1951. In 1954, the straight-wing Thunderjet was joined by the swept-wing F-84F Thunderstreak fighter and RF-84F Thunderflash photo reconnaissance aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bloodhound (missile)</span> British surface-to-air missile system

The Bristol Bloodhound is a British ramjet powered surface-to-air missile developed during the 1950s. It served as the UK's main air defence weapon into the 1990s and was in large-scale service with the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the forces of four other countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fireflash</span> Air-to-air missile

Fireflash was the United Kingdom's first air-to-air guided missile to see service with the Royal Air Force. Constructed by Fairey Aviation, the missile utilised radar beam riding guidance. Fireflash had relatively limited performance and required the launching aircraft to approach the target from a limited angle astern.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AIR-2 Genie</span> U.S. nuclear air-to-air rocket

The Douglas AIR-2 Genie was an unguided air-to-air rocket with a 1.5 kt W25 nuclear warhead. It was deployed by the United States Air Force and Canada during the Cold War. Production ended in 1962 after over 3,000 were made, with some related training and test derivatives being produced later.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Republic XF-103</span> Cancelled American military plane project of the 1940s-1950s

The Republic XF-103 was an American project to develop a powerful missile-armed interceptor aircraft capable of destroying Soviet bombers while flying at speeds as high as Mach 3. Despite a prolonged development, it never progressed past the mockup stage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">AGM-12 Bullpup</span> Air-to-ground command guided missile

The AGM-12 Bullpup is a short-range air-to-ground missile developed by Martin Marietta for the US Navy. It is among the earliest precision guided air-to-ground weapons and the first to be mass produced. It first saw operational use in 1959 on the A-4 Skyhawk, but soon found use on the A-6 Intruder, F-100 Super Sabre, F-105 Thunderchief, F-4 Phantom II, F-8 Crusader, and P-3 Orion in both Navy and US Air Force service, as well as NATO allies. The weapon was guided manually via a small joystick in the aircraft cockpit, which presented a number of problems and its ultimate accuracy was on the order of 10 metres (33 ft), greater than desired. In the 1960s it was increasingly supplanted by fully automatic weapons like the AGM-62 Walleye and AGM-65 Maverick.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lavochkin La-250</span> Soviet Interceptor Aircraft

The Lavochkin La-250 "Anakonda" was a high-altitude interceptor aircraft prototype developed in the Soviet Union by the Lavochkin design bureau in the 1950s. Its nickname "Anaconda" was invented during the flight test and referred to both the elongated body shape as well as the relatively critical flight characteristics of the machine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Red Dean</span> Air-to-air missile

Red Dean, a rainbow code name, was a large air-to-air missile developed for the Royal Air Force during the 1950s. Originally planned to use an active radar seeker to offer all-aspect performance and true fire-and-forget engagements, the valve-based electronics demanded a missile of prodigious size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vought XF8U-3 Crusader III</span> Fighter aircraft in the US Navy

The Vought XF8U-3 Crusader III was an aircraft developed by Chance Vought as a successor to the successful Vought F-8 Crusader program and as a competitor to the McDonnell Douglas F-4 Phantom II. Though based in spirit on the F8U-1 and F8U-2, and sharing the older aircraft's designation in the old Navy system, the two aircraft shared few parts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASM-135 ASAT</span> Anti-satellite missile

The ASM-135 ASAT is an air-launched anti-satellite multistage missile that was developed by Ling-Temco-Vought's LTV Aerospace division. The ASM-135 was carried exclusively by United States Air Force (USAF) F-15 Eagle fighter aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed NF-104A</span> Astronaut training aircraft conversion

The Lockheed NF-104A is an American mixed-power, high-performance, supersonic aerospace trainer that served as a low-cost astronaut training vehicle for the North American X-15 and projected Boeing X-20 Dyna-Soar programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">SSM-N-9 Regulus II</span> Cruise missile

The SSM-N-9 Regulus II cruise missile is a supersonic guided missile armed with a nuclear warhead, intended for launching from surface ships and submarines of the U.S. Navy (USN).

Aircraft have different ways to take off and land. Conventional airplanes accelerate along the ground until reaching a speed that is sufficient for the airplane to takeoff and climb at a safe speed. Some airplanes can take off at low speed, this being a short takeoff. Some aircraft such as helicopters and Harrier jump jets can take off and land vertically. Rockets also usually take off vertically, but some designs can land horizontally.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Moore 2008, p. 72.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Khurana 2009, p. 147.
  3. ↑ "Fighter Plane Launched Like Missile From Truck Platform." Popular Mechanics, March 1955, p. 108.
  4. ↑ Holder 2007, p. 138.
  5. ↑ Norman and Norris 2009, p. 32.
  6. ↑ Greg Goebel's Air Vectors' "The Zero-Length Launch Fighter" page
  7. ↑ Khurana 2009, p. 126.
  8. ↑ Moore 2008, pp. 72-73.
  9. ↑ Moore 2008, pp. 73-74.
  10. ↑ Moore 2008, pp. 74-75.
  11. ↑ Markman, Steve (2000). Straight up : a history of vertical flight. William G. Holder. Atglen, PA: Schiffer Pub. pp. 147–149. ISBN   0-7643-1204-9. OCLC   46790785. By the early 1950s, short ramps were used routinely to launch early cruise missiles. Engineers figured that perhaps this concept would work just as well for manned aircraft. But eliminating the runway for launch only solved half of the problem... one still would be needed for landing. But perhaps not. Thus was born the ZELMAL (ZEro-length Launch and MAt Landing) program. A rocket would be used to launch a fighter aircraft, then use an inflatable rubber mat, an arresting cable, and a tailhook for the landing. The mat they came up with measured 80 x 400 feet, was 30 inches thick, and had a slick surface coated with a lubricant to assure a smooth landing. [...] The first mat landing was performed on June 2, 1954, but was unsuccessful. The aircraft, S/N 51-1225, was piloted by a Martin Aircraft test pilot. The tailhook missed the arresting cables and tore through the mat surface, tearing open three air cells. Apparently the test pilot was not aware that the F-84 had a tail-hook/airplane flap interconnect system that automatically retracted the flaps when the tail hook contacted the arresting cable, or that he had a manual override switch. The momentary contact between the tail hook and the mat was enough to cause the flaps to retract and the aircraft to settle on the mat too quickly. Complicating the problem was the slow engine response to the pilot's full throttle command. The F-84 bounced off the mat, skidded across the lakebed, and was damaged beyond economical repair. The pilot received back injuries that grounded him for several months.
  12. ↑ "Collection search - Rocket Geometry Zero Length Launch CF-105 Arrow [architectural: technical drawing]".

Bibliography

  • Holder, William G. Lost fighters: a history of U.S. jet fighter programs that didn't make it. SAE, 2007. ISBN   0-7680-1712-2.
  • Khurana, K.C. Aviation Management: Global Perspectives. Global India Publications, 2009. ISBN   9-3802-2839-2.
  • Moore, Tony. X-Plane Crashes: Exploring Experimental, Rocket Plane, and Spycraft Incidents, Accidents and Crash Sites. Specialty Press, 2008. ISBN   1-5800-7222-4.
  • Polmar, Norman and Robert Stan Norris. The U.S. Nuclear Arsenal: A History of Weapons and Delivery Systems Since 1945. Naval Institute Press, 2009. ISBN   1-5575-0681-7.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.