1978 Broadcast Policy Statement on minority ownership

Last updated

The 1978 Broadcast Policy Statement on minority ownership is a publicly issued statement by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the state of minority and gender based ownership, the implications of previous ownership policies, and by taking affirmative action set into place two new additional policy measures aimed at progressing and encouraging continued diversity in media ownership. In this statement the FCC officially set forward two new programs favoring minority ownership of broadcasting facilities. [1]

Contents

Policy details

First, the program sought to stimulate diversity with the Tax Certificate Policy. This policy worked by awarding like-kind tax exchange breaks to licensees who sell their licenses to minorities. This was a two-year like-kind exchange, whereby the seller would not be required to pay taxes on money made by selling their license, as long as the capital gains are reinvested into a similar communication industry within two years of the sale. In addition the second program implemented through this statement was the Distress Sale Policy, which held that any license owners facing scrutiny by the FCC and potential license revocation, can sell their station to a minority buyer for 75% of the appraised value. The benefit of the Distress Sale Policy for licensees under investigation by the FCC, is that once they sell their license to a minority owner, the FCC would reward them by ceasing their inquiry into the licensee. The statement would also formalize the Comparative Hearing Process. [2]

Background on the Comparative Hearing Process

The Comparative Hearing Process is a system that was originally set into place by the Communications Act of 1934, and used to determine which applicant for a broadcast license is the best qualified to hold the license. In the event that more than one applicant applied for the same broadcast license a comparative hearing became necessary. An Administrative Law Judge would preside over hearing proceedings. There are factors that the FCC took into consideration when deciding whom to allocate a license to. The commission has for long been consistent in its position that ownership diversity will result in viewpoint diversity, and viewpoint diversity advances the public interest. The courts mostly agreed with this interpretation of the "public interest." Trends in the licensing process, and the actions of challenging applicants who wanted to obtain a license would make their way through deliberation via FCC rulings and court decisions which were ultimately upheld and added to the United States Code. The logic behind these Supreme Court decisions and affirmative action programs by the commission are demonstrated in different court rulings and FCC policy statements. In the 1965 Policy Statement on Comparative Broadcast Hearings the FCC made diversification a highly important component for awarding broadcasting licensees. The commission had established that the criteria of 'public convenience and necessity' was too broad a definition in determining whom to award licenses. [3]

Pretext to the 1978 policy statement

Subsequently, the 1965 statement defined two primary objectives to guide the process of comparison. These are, "the best practicable service to the public" and "a maximum diffusion of control of the media of mass communications." In between 1965 and the late seventies, social circumstances and legal disputes would alter these interpretations multiple times in comparative hearings to include race specifically (instead of just "diversity") as a determining factor. In this time, FCC Chairman Richard Wiley is credited with taking one of the first steps in seeing what could be done to grow minority ownership. To that end, he charged his staff with the task of examining the possibilities. More than ten years later, under the Chairmanship of Charles Ferris, the 1978 Broadcast Policy Statement would finally formalize the rules for awarding merit based on minority preference. [2]

These programs were devised and set into effect to improve previous policy rulings that were intended to encourage a broad range of diversity. The policy statement is how the Commission responded to prior FCC and High Court rulings regarding the comparative hearing process which they deemed ineffective. In the 1978 Statement on Minority Ownership the commission lays out their concern:

While the broadcasting industry has, on the whole, responded positively to its ascertainment obligations and has made significant strides in its employment practices, we are compelled to observe that the views of racial minorities continue to be inadequately represented in the broadcast media. This situation is detrimental not only to the minority audience but to all of the viewing and listening public. Adequate representations of minority viewpoints in programming serves not only the needs and interests of the minority community but also enriches and educates the non-minority audience. [4]

This scrutiny by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) comes after a trail of failed policy rulings by the Commission and the Supreme Court. The rulings, spanning the 1960s and 1970s would write and rewrite the thought behind how to interpret these guidelines for serving the public interest and maximizing diversity in media ownership, in accordance with the FCC's mission and purpose. It was around this time that the FCC started to pay closer attention to issues about race and gender as they relate to awarding broadcast licenses. Until 1949 in the U.S., a minority-owned radio station did not exist, and there were no minority-owned television stations until 1973. [5]

In addition to the Tax Certificate Policy and the Distress Sale Policy incentives for encouraging diversity, the 1978 Broadcast Policy Statement authorized the use of comparative credit or favorable consideration for minority applicants. These comparative hearings would award merit to applicants poised to contribute to the commission's goal of broadening ownership inclusion, and their aim for a "diversity of viewpoints". [4] Earning this favorable consideration meant that the applicant would be an active participant in the facilities daily operations, and serve a practicable purpose to the community in terms of content and viewpoints. [2] Eventually the Distress Sale Policy was overturned in 1987 by a 2–1 vote within the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, and later, the Tax Certificate Policy was repealed by congress in 1995 with perceived abuses being the reason. [6] In the 1990s the court would eliminate policies that awarded extra credit using race and gender as a basis for consideration. This period saw a movement away from policies concerning the use of gender or racial factors in comparative hearings and employment practices, and the 1996 Telecommunications Act eliminated the comparative hearing process for renewal of broadcast licensing entirely.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federal Communications Commission</span> Independent U.S. government agency

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent agency of the United States federal government that regulates communications by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable across the United States. The FCC maintains jurisdiction over the areas of broadband access, fair competition, radio frequency use, media responsibility, public safety, and homeland security.

The fairness doctrine of the United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC), introduced in 1949, was a policy that required the holders of broadcast licenses both to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints. In 1987, the FCC abolished the fairness doctrine, prompting some to urge its reintroduction through either Commission policy or congressional legislation. However, later the FCC removed the rule that implemented the policy from the Federal Register in August 2011.

In North American broadcasting, a local marketing agreement (LMA), or local management agreement, is a contract in which one company agrees to operate a radio or television station owned by another party. In essence, it is a sort of lease or time-buy.

Public Service Responsibility of Broadcast Licensees was a report published in 1946 by the (U.S.) Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which sought to require radio broadcasters in the United States to abide by a number of public service requirements. The report was informally and commonly referred to as the FCC Blue Book because of the report's blue cover.

A broadcast license is a type of spectrum license granting the licensee permission to use a portion of the radio frequency spectrum in a given geographical area for broadcasting purposes. The licenses generally include restrictions, which vary from band to band.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">KFSF-DT</span> UniMás TV station in Vallejo, California

KFSF-DT is a television station licensed to Vallejo, California, United States, broadcasting the Spanish-language UniMás network to the San Francisco Bay Area. It is owned and operated by TelevisaUnivision alongside San Francisco–licensed Univision outlet KDTV-DT. Both stations share studios on Zanker Road near the North San Jose Innovation District in San Jose, while KFSF's transmitter is located atop Sutro Tower in San Francisco.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WCAV</span> CBS/Fox affiliate in Charlottesville, Virginia

WCAV is a television station in Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, affiliated with CBS and Fox. It is owned by Lockwood Broadcast Group alongside low-power ABC affiliate WVAW-LD. Both stations share studios on Rio East Court in Charlottesville, while WCAV's transmitter is located on Carters Mountain south of the city.

WOPG is an AM radio station licensed to Albany, New York and serving the Capital District. It is owned by Pax et Bonum, Inc. and has a Christian radio format aimed at Roman Catholic listeners, with much of its programming coming from the EWTN Radio network. WOPG simulcasts with WOPG-FM at 89.9 FM in Esperance, New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">KXMZ</span> Radio station in Box Elder, South Dakota

KXMZ is a radio station serving the city of Rapid City, South Dakota and owned by Houston Haugo, through licensee Haugo Broadcasting, Licensed to Box Elder, South Dakota, the station broadcasts a hot adult contemporary format.

WGTW-TV is a religious television station licensed to Millville, New Jersey, United States, owned and operated by the Trinity Broadcasting Network (TBN). It previously served the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania television market, but can now only be received in Southern New Jersey. The station's studios are located on Columbia Avenue in suburban Folcroft, Pennsylvania; its transmitter was previously located in the Roxborough section of Philadelphia, but is now shared with True Crime Network affiliate WMGM-TV along Avalon Boulevard in the Swainton section of Middle Township, east of the Garden State Parkway off Exit 13.

<i>Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod v. FCC</i>

Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod v. FCC was a 1998 D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals case involving the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) enforcement of the Equal Employment Opportunity Act and the Fifth Amendment. The FCC claimed that the Lutheran Church–Missouri Synod had violated the FCC's Equal Employment Opportunity requirements by not hiring enough minorities/women and by requiring a knowledge of Lutheran doctrine in order to be hired to work at its two FM and AM radio stations located in Clayton, Missouri.

Media cross-ownership is the common ownership of multiple media sources by a single person or corporate entity. Media sources include radio, broadcast television, specialty and pay television, cable, satellite, Internet Protocol television (IPTV), newspapers, magazines and periodicals, music, film, book publishing, video games, search engines, social media, internet service providers, and wired and wireless telecommunications.

Minority ownership of media outlets in the United States is the concept of having ownership of media outlets to reflect the demographic population of the area which the media serves. This is to help ensure that media addresses issues that are of concern to the needs and interests of the local population.

Daniel Harrison Overmyer was an American businessman and warehouse mogul. During the height of his career, Overmyer was referred to as "the king of warehousing".

KTTL, known as KMCS from 1984, was a radio station in Dodge City, Kansas, broadcasting to southwest Kansas on 93.9FM from 1977 to 1986. The station was owned by Cattle Country Broadcasting, a business of Charles and Nellie Babbs. In 1983, racist remarks on religious programs broadcast over country-formatted KTTL and connections to the Posse Comitatus movement led to state and national backlash against the station; after relaunching the station as a contemporary hit radio outlet under the KMCS call letters and having its license renewal designated for hearing, Charles Babbs settled the hearing by agreeing not to pursue a renewal of KMCS's license.

WIFE-FM was a radio station broadcasting on 107.9 FM in Indianapolis, Indiana, United States. Owned and operated by the Star Stations group for most of its history, it broadcast from October 22, 1961, to September 2, 1976.

WJJZ was a radio station broadcasting on 1460 AM in Mount Holly, New Jersey, United States, from 1963 to 1965 and again from 1967 to 1983. It was operated on two separate licenses by two separate groups, each of which ended with authority to continue operations being denied by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC).

Federal Communications Commission v. Prometheus Radio Project, 592 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case dealing with media ownership rules that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) can set under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. The case dates back to Third Circuit rulings from 2002 that have blocked FCC decisions to relax media ownership rules related to cross-ownership of newspapers with television and radio broadcast stations. In the present case, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously in April 2021 that the FCC had not made arbitrary and capricious rulemaking decisions in the context of the Administrative Procedure Act, nor had the requirement to review minority ownership of stations under Congressional mandate as stated in the Third Circuit's ruling, reversing this last ruling and allowing the FCC to proceed to relax cross-media ownership rules.

KVOF-TV was a television station that broadcast on channel 38 in San Francisco from 1968 to 1985. It was last owned by the Faith Broadcasting Network, controlled by pastor W. Eugene Scott, and was one of three television stations he owned; prior to its existence as a Christian station, it was built as independent station KUDO before going bankrupt in 1971 and being off the air for more than three years. It broadcast from San Bruno Mountain.

The comparative hearing process was used by the United States Federal Radio Commission from 1927 to 1934 and its successor, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), from 1934 to 1994 for the evaluation of mutually exclusive applications for broadcast stations and other licenses. Commission examiners evaluated criteria to make an initial decision, which could then be appealed to a review board and then the full commission.

References

  1. ↑ Bush, Antoinette C.; Martin, Marc S. (1996). "The FCC's Minority Ownership Policies from Broadcasting to PCS". Federal Communications Law Journal. 48: 423–445.
  2. 1 2 3 FCC Record: KPMG LLP, Economic Consulting Services for the FCC. History of the Broadcast License Application Process. Washington D.C.: Federal Communications Commission, 2000. Web.
  3. ↑ Hyde, Rosel H. (1975). "FCC Policy and Procedures relating to Hearings on Broadcast Applications in Which a New Applicant Seeks to Displace a Licensee Seeking Renewal". Duke Law Journal. 24: 253–278.
  4. 1 2 FCC Record: Statement of Policy on Minority Ownership of Broadcasting Facilities. Washington, D.C.: Federal Communications Commission. May, 1978.
  5. ↑ Robinson, Bari S. (1979). "Achieving Diversity in Media Ownership: Bakke and the FCC". California Law Review. 67: 230–255.
  6. ↑ Wildet, Bruce R. (1990). "FCC Tax Certificates For Minority Ownership of Broadcast Facilities: A Critical Re-examination of Policy". University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 138: 979–1026.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.