Fleeting expletive

Last updated

A fleeting expletive is a non-scripted verbal profanity or obscenity expressed and broadcast during a live television broadcast or radio broadcast. The term appears primarily in discussions of United States broadcasting law.

Contents

Notable examples

In chronological order:

U.S. Supreme Court case (2008)

On March 17, 2008, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear, in September 2008, a case on whether the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is allowed to regulate the use of fleeting expletives on television broadcasts. [19] [20] [21] [22] The parties in the case are the Fox Broadcasting Company (supported by other television networks including ABC, CBS, and NBC) and the FCC. [19] [20] [21] [22] A federal appeals court had ruled in the favor of the networks; the Supreme Court has agreed to hear the FCC's appeal. [19] [20] [21] [22]

In a ruling issued April 28, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled to uphold the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fleeting expletive rule. [23] The court reversed a lower court ruling in the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York which found in favor of Fox Television that the FCC had not properly followed procedures in creating the rule. In the 5–4 ruling by Justice Antonin Scalia, "the court did not definitively settle the First Amendment implications of allowing a federal agency to censor broadcasts." [24] Instead the court suggested the First Amendment issue should be raised in a Federal Appeals Court.

U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals (2010)

In a ruling announced July 13, 2010, the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the FCC indecency policy on fleeting expletives. Calling it "unconstitutionally vague", the unanimous three-judge panel found the policy could infringe upon the constitutionally protected First Amendment freedom of speech. According to the panel, the policy "created a chilling effect that goes far beyond the fleeting expletives at issue here", in part due to a lack of guidance on what content is considered offensive. [25]

Fox released a statement stating, "We have always felt that the government's position on fleeting expletives was unconstitutional," and, "While we will continue to strive to eliminate expletives from live broadcasts, the inherent challenges broadcasters face with live television, coupled with the human element required for monitoring, must allow for the unfortunate isolated instances where inappropriate language slips through." [26]

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski indicated the commission will be "reviewing the court's decision in light of our commitment to protect children, empower parents, and uphold the First Amendment." [26]

U.S. Supreme Court ruling (2012)

In June 2012, the Supreme Court rescinded several fines issued by the FCC regarding indecent content, including the Fox case stemming from the 2002 Billboard Music Awards. The court ruled that the FCC's change in enforcement policy to target fleeting instances of profanities and nudity on television was too vague, thus violating their rights to due process. The court did not address the policies themselves. [27] [28]

Canadian Broadcast Standards Council opinion

In cases of live microphones capturing profanities used by players during a football game, the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council (CBSC) adopted the opinion that under the Code of Ethics of the Canadian Association of Broadcasters, "given the goal of 'ensuring a 'safe haven' for audiences uncomfortable with the use of coarse or offensive language' some efforts need to be made to reconcile the potential for adult content", including viewer advisories. [29]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seven dirty words</span> Words traditionally disallowed in U.S. broadcast radio and television

The seven dirty words are seven English-language curse words that American comedian George Carlin first listed in his 1972 "Seven Words You Can Never Say on Television" monologue. The words, in the order Carlin listed them, are: "shit", "piss", "fuck", "cunt", "cocksucker", "motherfucker", and "tits".

Federal Communications Commission v. Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726 (1978), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that upheld the ability of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to regulate indecent content sent over the broadcast airwaves.

In broadcasting, the watershed is the time of day after which programming with content deemed suitable only for mature or adult audiences is permitted. In the same way that a geological watershed divides two drainage basins, a broadcasting watershed serves as a dividing line in a schedule between family-friendly content, and content deemed suitable only for a more mature audience, such as programs containing objectionable content; this can include graphic violence, strong language, and sexual content, or strong references to those themes, even if they are not shown explicitly. The transition to more adult material must not be unduly abrupt and the strongest material should appear later in the evening.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Powell (lobbyist)</span> American politician

Michael Kevin Powell is an American attorney and lobbyist who served as the 24th chairman of the Federal Communications Commission from 2001 to 2005. Since leaving office, Powell has since worked as the president of the National Cable & Telecommunications Association (NCTA), a broadband industry trade association.

Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15 (1971), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment prevented the conviction of Paul Robert Cohen for the crime of disturbing the peace by wearing a jacket displaying "Fuck the Draft" in the public corridors of a California courthouse.

Bollocks is a word of Middle English origin meaning "testicles". The word is often used in British English and Irish English in a multitude of negative ways; it most commonly appears as a noun meaning "rubbish" or "nonsense", an expletive following a minor accident or misfortune, or an adjective to describe something that is of poor quality or useless. It is also used in common phrases like "bollocks to this", which is said when quitting a task or job that is too difficult or negative, and "that's a load of old bollocks", which generally indicates contempt for a certain subject or opinion. Conversely, the word also appears in positive phrases such as "the dog's bollocks" or more simply "the bollocks", which will refer to something which is admired or well-respected.

A bleep censor is the replacement of offensive language or classified information with a beep sound, used in public television, radio and social media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show controversy</span> 2004 controversy over broadcast indecency

The Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show, which was broadcast live on February 1, 2004, from Houston, Texas, on the CBS television network, is notable for a moment in which Janet Jackson's right breast and nipple—adorned with a nipple shield—was exposed by Justin Timberlake to the viewing public. The incident, sometimes referred to as Nipplegate or Janetgate, led to an immediate crackdown and widespread discourse on perceived indecency in broadcasting.

The Parents Television and Media Council (PTMC), formerly the Parents Television Council (PTC), is an American media advocacy group founded by conservative political pundit L. Brent Bozell III in 1995, which advocates for what it considers to be responsible, family-friendly content across all media platforms, and for advertisers to be held accountable for the content of television programs that they sponsor. The PTMC officially describes itself as a non-partisan organization, although the group has also been described as partisan and socially conservative.

Nudity in American television is a controversial topic. Aside from a few exceptions, nudity in the United States has traditionally not been shown on terrestrial television. On the other hand, cable television has been much less constrained as far as nudity is concerned.

<i>Fuck</i> English-language profanity

Fuck is an English-language profanity which often refers to the act of sexual intercourse, but is also commonly used as an intensifier or to convey disdain. While its origin is obscure, it is usually considered to be first attested to around 1475. In modern usage, the term fuck and its derivatives are used as a noun, a verb, an adjective, an interjection or an adverb. There are many common phrases that employ the word as well as compounds that incorporate it, such as motherfucker and fuck off.

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502 (2009), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court that upheld regulations of the Federal Communications Commission that ban "fleeting expletives" on television broadcasts, finding they were not arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act. The constitutional issue, however, was not resolved and was remanded to the Second Circuit and re-appealed to the Supreme Court for a decision in June 2012.

Profanity in science fiction (SF) shares all of the issues of profanity in fiction in general, but has several unique aspects of its own, including the use of alien profanities.

"I Bet You They Won't Play This Song on the Radio" is a song performed by Eric Idle, an English comedian and member of Monty Python. It mocks radio censorship of words considered inappropriate. Another similar song, also by Idle, is "The FCC Song", whose refrain "Fuck you very much" is directed at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission. "I Bet You They Won't Play This Song on the Radio" touches on the same subject, but includes bleepings and comic sound-effect noises in place of actual profanity.

It is common to find minced oaths in literature and media. Writers often include minced oaths instead of profanity in their writing to avoid offending their audience or incurring censorship.

FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc. refers to two related Supreme Court cases:

Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc., 567 U.S. 239 (2012), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States regarding whether the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's scheme for regulating speech is unconstitutionally vague. The Supreme Court excused the broadcasters from paying fines levied for what the FCC had determined indecency, in a majority opinion delivered by Justice Anthony Kennedy. The Supreme Court had previously issued an opinion in the case in 2009 addressing the nature of the fine itself, without addressing the restriction on indecent speech.

Profanity in the Norwegian language is referred to in Norwegian as banneord or simply upassende språk. Many words are characterized by dialect. The offensiveness and strength of a word may be very different between regions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inappropriateness</span> Standards or ethics that are typically viewed as being negative in a society

Inappropriateness refers to standards or ethics that are typically viewed as being negative in a society. It differs from things that are illicit in that inappropriate behavior does not necessarily have any accompanying legal ramifications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tagalog profanity</span> Profanity in the language of the Philippines

Tagalog profanity can refer to a wide range of offensive, blasphemous, and taboo words or expressions in the Tagalog language of the Philippines. Due to Filipino culture, expressions which may sound benign when translated back to English can cause great offense; while some expressions English speakers might take great offense to can sound benign to a Tagalog speaker. Filipino, the national language of the Philippines, is the standard register of Tagalog, so as such the terms Filipino profanity and Filipino swear words are sometimes also employed.

References

  1. ↑ "Cher nailed for F-word indecency » Cherworld.com - Cher Photos, Music, Tour & Tickets". Cherworld.com. 8 November 2006. Archived from the original on 2015-06-10. Retrieved 2013-10-08.
  2. ↑ "Earnhardt docked for cursing on TV". Las Vegas Sun. 2004-10-05. Retrieved 2023-12-25.
  3. ↑ Itzkoff, Dave (September 27, 2009). "Newcomer Makes a Slip". The New York Times . Retrieved 2009-09-28.
  4. ↑ "Biden Drops the F-Bomb?". Talking Points Memo. 2010-03-23. Archived from the original on 2021-12-15. Retrieved 2010-07-13.
  5. ↑ 11/19/11 12:11pm 11/19/11 12:11pm (19 November 2011). "'"Ah Fuck It": Lee Corso Strikes Again', Deadspin". Deadspin.com. Retrieved 2013-10-08.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  6. ↑ ""Corso picks Cougars with F-Bomb, then Apologizes", "Houston Chronicle" blog". Blog.chron.com. 2011-11-19. Archived from the original on 2012-01-03. Retrieved 2013-10-08.
  7. ↑ '"Ah Fuck It": Lee Corso Strikes Again', Deadspin
  8. ↑ "Corso picks Cougars with F-Bomb, then Apologizes" Archived 2011-11-21 at the Wayback Machine Image capturing co-hosts' reaction, Houston Chronicle blog
  9. ↑ "Lee Corso Apologizes", ESPN Video/ Lee Corso Apologizes at the Wayback Machine (archived November 23, 2011)
  10. ↑ "Harvey Dahl profanity". YouTube. December 18, 2011. Archived from the original on 2021-12-15. Retrieved May 24, 2020.
  11. ↑ "Potty-mouth ref gives Dolphins-Colts crowd an earful". National Football League . 2012-11-04. Retrieved 2012-11-04.
  12. ↑ "NFL fines referee for swearing on open mic". National Football League . 2012-11-16. Archived from the original on November 17, 2012. Retrieved 2012-11-16.
  13. ↑ Greenberg, Chris (2013-04-20). "WATCH: Emotional Ceremony At Fenway Park". HuffPost. Retrieved 2020-05-24.
  14. ↑ FCC, The (2013-04-20). "David Ortiz spoke from the heart at today's Red Sox game. I stand with Big Papi and the people of Boston - Julius". @FCC. Retrieved 2020-05-24.
  15. ↑ Simpson, Connor (2013-07-04). "There Were 25 FCC Complaints Over Big Papi's Boston Rallying Curse". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2020-05-24.
  16. ↑ Ross, Jamie (7 January 2021). "Joe Scarborough Unleashes Fury at Capitol Cops: 'You Opened the Fucking Doors for Them'". The Daily Beast.
  17. ↑ "Father of Parkland school shooting victim speaks about Robb Elementary and begs Sen. Ted Cruz for action: 'I listened to your nonsense. I listened to your BS.'". Insider.com .
  18. ↑ "Parkland father left "shaking" after Uvalde school shooting". Newsweek. May 24, 2022.
  19. 1 2 3 "US Court to Rule on TV Expletives". BBC News. 2008-03-17. Retrieved 2008-03-20.
  20. 1 2 3 Mears, Bill (2008-03-17). "High Court to Review Penalties for TV Expletives". CNN. Retrieved 2008-03-20.
  21. 1 2 3 Richey, Warren (2008-03-18). "FCC's Obscenity Rule to Get Supreme Court's Ear". Christian Science Monitor . Retrieved 2008-03-20.
  22. 1 2 3 Savage, David G. (2008-03-18). "Supreme Court to Rule on Broadcast Indecency". Los Angeles Times . Archived from the original on 2008-05-13. Retrieved 2008-03-20.
  23. ↑ Bravin, Jess (2009-04-28). "Court Upholds FCC 'Fleeting Expletive' Rule". The Wall Street Journal . Retrieved 2009-04-28.
  24. ↑ The FCC Doesn't Need to Be by Peter Suderman, Reason
  25. ↑ FCC Indecency Rules Struck Down by Julianne Pepitone, CNN Money
  26. 1 2 F.C.C. Indecency Policy Rejected on Appeal by Edward Wyatt, The New York Times
  27. ↑ Liptak, Adam (21 June 2012). "Supreme Court Rejects F.C.C. Fines for Indecency". The New York Times. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
  28. ↑ "Supreme Court cops out, again, on "fleeting expletives"". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2018-10-02.
  29. ↑ "TSN 4 re CFL on TSN (Hamilton at Ottawa) · Canadian Broadcast Standards Council" . Retrieved 2019-07-02.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.