Acoustic levitation

Last updated

Acoustic levitation is a method for suspending matter in air against gravity using acoustic radiation pressure from high intensity sound waves. [1] [2]

Contents

It works on the same principles as acoustic tweezers by harnessing acoustic radiation forces. However acoustic tweezers are generally small scale devices which operate in a fluid medium and are less affected by gravity, whereas acoustic levitation is primarily concerned with overcoming gravity. Technically dynamic acoustic levitation is a form of acoustophoresis, though this term is more commonly associated with small scale acoustic tweezers. [3]

Typically sound waves at ultrasonic frequencies are used [4] thus creating no sound audible to humans. This is primarily due to the high intensity of sound required to counteract gravity. However, there have been cases of audible frequencies being used. [5]

A Langevin horn type standing wave acoustic levitator at the Argonne National Laboratory

There are various techniques for generating the sound, but the most common is the use of piezoelectric transducers which can efficiently generate high amplitude outputs at the desired frequencies.

Levitation is a promising method for containerless processing of microchips and other small, delicate objects in industry. Containerless processing may also be used for applications requiring very-high-purity materials or chemical reactions too rigorous to happen in a container. This method is harder to control than others such as electromagnetic levitation but has the advantage of being able to levitate nonconducting materials.

Although originally static, acoustic levitation has progressed from motionless levitation to dynamic control of hovering objects, an ability useful in the pharmaceutical and electronics industries. [6] [7] This dynamic control was first realised with a prototype with a chessboard-like array of square acoustic emitters that move an object from one square to another by slowly lowering the sound intensity emitted from one square while increasing the sound intensity from the other, allowing the object to travel virtually "downhill". [7] More recently the development of phased array transducer boards have allowed more arbitrary dynamic control of multiple particles and droplets at once. [8] [9] [10]

Recent advancements have also seen the price of the technology decrease significantly. The "TinyLev" is an acoustic levitator which can be constructed with widely available, low-cost off-the-shelf components, and a single 3D printed frame. [11] [12]

History

Experimental

A drawing of the Kundt's tube experiment. The movement of the particles due to the acoustic radiation forces were the first demonstration of the possibility of acoustic levitation. Kundt tube.png
A drawing of the Kundt's tube experiment. The movement of the particles due to the acoustic radiation forces were the first demonstration of the possibility of acoustic levitation.

The first demonstration of the possibility of acoustic levitation was made in Kundt's Tube experiments in 1866. The experiment in a resonant chamber demonstrated that the particles could be gathered at the nodes of a standing wave by the acoustic radiation forces. However, the original experiment was conducted with the intention of calculating the wavelengths and therefore the speed of sound within a gas.

The first levitation was demonstrated by Bücks and Muller in 1933 who levitated alcohol droplets between a quartz crystal and a reflector. [13] The next advance came from Hilary St Clair, who was interested in acoustic radiation forces primarily for their applications on the agglomeration of dust particles for use in mining applications. [14] [15] He created the first electromagnetic device for creating the excitation amplitudes necessary for levitation, [16] then went on to levitate larger and heavier objects, including a coin. [14]

Taylor Wang was the leader of a team which made significant use of acoustic radiation forces as a containment mechanism in zero gravity, taking a device up on the Space Shuttle Challenger mission STS-51-B to investigate the behaviour of levitated droplets in micro-gravity. [17] Further experiments were conducted in 1992 aboard United States Microgravity Laboratory 1 (USML-1), [18] and in 1995 aboard USML-2. [19]

The most common levitator from at least the 1970s [20] until 2017 was the Langevin Horn, [21] consisting of a piezo-electric actuator, a metal transmitter and a reflector. However, this required precise tuning of the distance between the transmitter and the reflector as the distance between source and reflector needed to be an exact multiple of the wavelength. This is more difficult than it sounds as the wavelength varies with the speed of sound, which varies with environmental factors such as temperature and altitude. Significant studies have been made with such devices including into contactless chemistry [22] [23] and the levitation of small animals. [24] A number of these were also combined to create continuous planar motion by reducing the sound intensity from one source whilst increasing that of the adjacent source, allowing the particle to travel "downhill" in the acoustic potential field. [7]

A TinyLev acoustic levitator including the electronics and a diagram of the peak pressure field. TinyLev Acoustic Levitator Diagram.jpg
A TinyLev acoustic levitator including the electronics and a diagram of the peak pressure field.

A new generation of acoustic levitators employing a large number of small individual piezoelectric-transducers have recently become more common. [25] The first of these levitators was a single-axis standing wave levitator called the TinyLev. [12] [11] The key differences from the Langevin Horn were the use of sources from both top and bottom (rather than a source and a reflector) and the use of a large number of small transducers with parallel excitation, rather than a single piezoelectric element. The use of two opposing travelling waves, as opposed to a single source and a reflector, meant that levitation was still possible even when the distance between the top and bottom was not a precise multiple of the wavelength. This led to a more robust system which does not require any tuning before operation. The use of multiple small sources was initially designed as a cost saving measure, but also opened the door for phased array levitation, discussed below. The use of 3D printed components for the frame which positions and focuses the transducers and Arduinos as signal generators also significantly reduced the cost whilst increasing the accessibility, [26] The reduction in cost was particularly important as a principal aim of this device was the democratisation of the technology. [27]

This new approach also led to significant developments using Phased Array Ultrasonic Transducers [9] [8] (often referred to as PATs) for levitation. Phased Array Ultrasonic Transducers are a collection of ultrasonic speakers which are controlled to create a single desired sound field. This is achieved by controlling the relative phase (i.e. the delay time) between each output, and sometimes the relative output magnitudes. Unlike their counterparts in the non-destructive testing or imaging fields, these arrays will use a continuous output, as opposed to short bursts of energy. This has enabled single sided levitation [9] as well as manipulation of large numbers of particles simultaneously. [8]

Another approach which is growing in popularity is the use of 3D-printed components to apply the phase delays necessary for levitation, creating a similar effect to the PATs but with the advantage that they can have a higher spatial resolution than the phased array, allowing more complex fields to be formed. [28] These are sometimes referred to as Acoustic Holograms, [29] Metasurfaces, [30] Delay lines [31] or Metamaterials. [32] [33] The differences in terms are primarily based on the area from which the design technique originated, but the basic idea behind all techniques is essentially the same. They can also be used in conjunction with PATs to obtain dynamic reconfigurability and higher sound field resolution. [28] Another advantage is the reduction in cost, with a prominent example being the low cost ultrasonic tractor beam [34] for which an instructables was created. [35]

Although many new techniques for manipulation have been developed, Langevin Horns are still used in research. They are often favoured for research into the dynamics of levitated objects due to the simplicity of their geometry and subsequent ease of simulation [36] and control of experimental factors. [37]

Theoretical

Lord Rayleigh developed theories about the pressure force associated with sound waves in the early 1900s, [38] [39] however this work was primarily based around the theoretical forces and energy contained within a sound wave. The first analysis of particles was conducted by L.V. King in 1934, who calculated the force on incompressible particles in an acoustic field. [40] This was followed by Yosioka and Kawisama, who calculated the forces on compressible particles in plane acoustic waves. [41] This was followed by Lev P. Gor'kov's work which generalised the field into the Gor'kov potential, [42] the mathematical foundation for acoustic levitation which is still in widespread use today.

The Gor'kov potential is limited by its assumptions to spheres with a radius significantly less than the wavelength, [43] the typical limit is considered to be one-tenth of the wavelength. [44] [45] Further analytical solutions are available for simple geometries however, to extend to larger or non-spherical objects it is common to use numerical methods, particularly the finite element method [46] [36] or the boundary element method. [47] [48] [49] Radiation pressure of sound can also be controlled through sub-wavelength patterning of the surface of the object. [50]

Types of Levitation

Acoustic levitation can broadly be divided into five different categories: [1]

  1. Standing Wave Levitation: Particles are trapped at the nodes of a standing wave, formed by either a sound source and reflector (in the case of the Langevin Horn) or two sets of sources (in the case of the TinyLev). This relies upon the particles being small relative to the wavelength, typically in the region of 10% or less, and the maximum levitated weight is usually in the order of a few milligrams. [1] It is also worth noting that if the particle is too small relative to the wavelength then it will behave differently and travel to the anti-nodes. [51] Typically these levitators are single-axis, meaning that all particles are trapped along a single, central axis of the levitator. However, with the use of PATs they can also be dynamic. This is the strongest technique for levitation at a distance greater than a wavelength due to the constructive interference from the two travelling waves which form it. The forces from single beam levitation at a distance are 30 times weaker than a simple standing wave. [52]
    A single beam acoustic levitator using a vortex trap to levitate an expanded polystyrene particle approximately twice the size of the wavelength. The vortices are alternated rapidly in direction to avoid spinning the particle to the point of instability. Here 450 transducers at 40kHz are used. Acoustic Virtual Vortices Levitating Mie Particle.jpg
    A single beam acoustic levitator using a vortex trap to levitate an expanded polystyrene particle approximately twice the size of the wavelength. The vortices are alternated rapidly in direction to avoid spinning the particle to the point of instability. Here 450 transducers at 40kHz are used.
  2. Far Field Acoustic Levitation: Larger than wavelength objects are levitated by generating a field which is tailored to the levitated object's size and shape. This allows objects larger than the wavelength to be levitated at distances greater than the wavelength from the source. However, the object must not be high density. In early approaches this was a simple vertical standing wave for disks [20] or a three transducer arrangement to stabilise a sphere. [54] However, recent developments have used a PAT and the boundary element method to levitate much larger objects at much longer distances. The heaviest object lifted by this technique is a 30mm diameter expanded polystyrene sphere of mass 0.6g. [48] An expanded polystyrene octahedron with a diagonal length of 50mm and mass 0.5g is the largest object ever acoustically levitated by this technique using PATs above and below the object. [48]
  3. Single Beam Levitation: Levitation of objects at a distance greater than a single wavelength from the sources with access only from a single side. In this case the trap must be specially designed, and usually takes the form of a twin trap or a vortex trap, although a third trap type called a bottle trap is also possible. The twin trap is the simplest of these possibilities which forms two high pressure "tweezers" on either side of the particle. [9] If geometric focusing is used then this can be used to build a tractor beam with commonly available parts. [31] [35] The vortex trap creates a "hole" of low pressure in the centre. It requires a more complex phase field but, unlike the twin trap, can be used to lift larger than wavelength objects. [53] In 2019 the largest object ever lifted by a tractor beam was done so at the University of Bristol and shown on "The Edge of Science," [55] a BBC Earth production for YouTube Originals by presenter Rick Edwards. It was a 19.53mm diameter expanded polystyrene ball.
  4. Near Field Levitation: A large, planar object is placed very close to the transducer surface and acts as a reflector, allowing it to levitate on a very thin film of air. This technique is capable of lifting several kilograms, but cannot go higher than hundreds of micrometers above the surface. [56] As such on a human scale it appears more as a huge reduction in friction, rather than as levitation.
  5. Inverted Near Field Acoustic Levitation: Under certain conditions the repulsive force which produces near field levitation inverts and become an attractive force. In this case the transducer can be pointed downwards and the set up will levitate the object will be levitated below it. The object will be levitated at a distance of tens of micrometers and objects in the milligram scale have been levitated. Current research suggests it occurs where the equivalent radius of the disk is less than 38% of the wavelength [46]

These broad classifications are a single way of sorting the types of levitation, but they are not definitive. Further work is being conducted on combining techniques to obtain greater abilities, such as the stable levitation of non axis-symmetric objects by combining standing wave levitation with a twin-trap (typically a single beam levitation technique). [52] There is also a significant amount of work into combining these techniques with 3D printed phase shifting components for advantages such as passive field forming [29] [31] [32] or higher spatial resolution. [29] [28] There is also significant variation in the control techniques. Whilst PATs are common it has also been shown that Chladni Plates can be used as a single standing wave source to manipulate levitated objects by changing the frequency. [57]

Applications

The main applications of acoustic levitation are likely to be scientific and industrial.

A selection of acoustically Levitated Objects in a TinyLev including solids, liquids, an ant and an electrical component. All in the size range of 2 mm-6 mm. Acoustically Levitated Objects in a TinyLev.jpg
A selection of acoustically Levitated Objects in a TinyLev including solids, liquids, an ant and an electrical component. All in the size range of 2 mm-6 mm.
(Left) Images of acoustically levitated droplets during liquid evaporation and particle formation. (Right) X-ray microtomography gives insights into the final particle 3D structure. Doerr2020 Paper Peptide Isolation via Spray Drying.jpg
(Left) Images of acoustically levitated droplets during liquid evaporation and particle formation. (Right) X-ray microtomography gives insights into the final particle 3D structure.

Acoustic levitation provides a container-less environment for droplet drying experiments to study liquid evaporation and particle formation. [59] [60] The contactless manipulation of droplets has also gained significant interest as it promises small scale contactless chemistry [21] There is particular interest in the mixing of multiple droplets using PATs so that chemical reactions can be studied in isolation from containers. [61] [10] There is also interest in using a small levitated droplet as container of protein crystals for X-ray diffraction experiments to determine the crystal structure at atomic resolution at room temperature at high thoughput. [62] [63]

The levitation of small living animals has also been studied, and the vitality of animals which typically exist in air was not affected. [24] In the future it could be used as a tool to study the animals themselves.

There is active research in the field of contactless assembly. The levitation of surface mount electrical components has been demonstrated [12] [46] as has micro-assembly with a combination of acoustic and magnetic fields. [64] There is also commercial interest in 3D printing whilst levitated, with Boeing filing a patent on the concept. [65]

Acoustic levitation has also been proposed as a technique for creating a volumetric display, with light projected onto a particle, which moves along the path to create the image faster than the eye can process. This has already proved possible [66] and has been brought together with audio and haptic feedback from the same PAT. [67]

An acoustophoretic volumetric display where a small expanded polystyrene particle is rapidly moved with light projected onto it to produce the image of a 'stop sign'. This is a composite image taken over 20 seconds. Acoustophoretic Volumetric Display.jpg
An acoustophoretic volumetric display where a small expanded polystyrene particle is rapidly moved with light projected onto it to produce the image of a 'stop sign'. This is a composite image taken over 20 seconds.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rayleigh scattering</span> Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by particles smaller than the radiations wavelength

Rayleigh scattering, named after the 19th-century British physicist Lord Rayleigh, is the predominantly elastic scattering of light or other electromagnetic radiation by particles much smaller than the wavelength of the radiation. For light frequencies well below the resonance frequency of the scattering particle, the amount of scattering is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the wavelength.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultrasound</span> Sound waves with frequencies above the human hearing range

Ultrasound is sound with frequencies greater than 20 kilohertz. This frequency is the approximate upper audible limit of human hearing in healthy young adults. The physical principles of acoustic waves apply to any frequency range, including ultrasound. Ultrasonic devices operate with frequencies from 20 kHz up to several gigahertz.

Wave–particle duality is the concept in quantum mechanics that quantum entities exhibit both particle and a wave properties according to the experimental circumstances. It expresses the inability of the classical concepts "particle" or "wave" to fully describe the behaviour of quantum-scale objects. As Albert Einstein wrote:

It seems as though we must use sometimes the one theory and sometimes the other, while at times we may use either. We are faced with a new kind of difficulty. We have two contradictory pictures of reality; separately neither of them fully explains the phenomena of light, but together they do.

Optical tweezers are scientific instruments that use a highly focused laser beam to hold and move microscopic and sub-microscopic objects like atoms, nanoparticles and droplets, in a manner similar to tweezers. If the object is held in air or vacuum without additional support, it can be called optical levitation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface acoustic wave</span> Sound wave which travels along the surface of an elastic material

A surface acoustic wave (SAW) is an acoustic wave traveling along the surface of a material exhibiting elasticity, with an amplitude that typically decays exponentially with depth into the material, such that they are confined to a depth of about one wavelength.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scanning acoustic microscope</span>

A scanning acoustic microscope (SAM) is a device which uses focused sound to investigate, measure, or image an object. It is commonly used in failure analysis and non-destructive evaluation. It also has applications in biological and medical research. The semiconductor industry has found the SAM useful in detecting voids, cracks, and delaminations within microelectronic packages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sound amplification by stimulated emission of radiation</span>

Sound amplification by stimulated emission of radiation (SASER) refers to a device that emits acoustic radiation. It focuses sound waves in a way that they can serve as accurate and high-speed carriers of information in many kinds of applications—similar to uses of laser light.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bessel beam</span> Non-diffractive wave

A Bessel beam is a wave whose amplitude is described by a Bessel function of the first kind. Electromagnetic, acoustic, gravitational, and matter waves can all be in the form of Bessel beams. A true Bessel beam is non-diffractive. This means that as it propagates, it does not diffract and spread out; this is in contrast to the usual behavior of light, which spreads out after being focused down to a small spot. Bessel beams are also self-healing, meaning that the beam can be partially obstructed at one point, but will re-form at a point further down the beam axis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ultrasonic transducer</span> Acoustic sensor

Ultrasonic transducers and ultrasonic sensors are devices that generate or sense ultrasound energy. They can be divided into three broad categories: transmitters, receivers and transceivers. Transmitters convert electrical signals into ultrasound, receivers convert ultrasound into electrical signals, and transceivers can both transmit and receive ultrasound.

Picosecond ultrasonics is a type of ultrasonics that uses ultra-high frequency ultrasound generated by ultrashort light pulses. It is a non-destructive technique in which picosecond acoustic pulses penetrate into thin films or nanostructures to reveal internal features such as film thickness as well as cracks, delaminations and voids. It can also be used to probe liquids. The technique is also referred to as picosecond laser ultrasonics or laser picosecond acoustics.

Thermographic inspection refers to the nondestructive testing (NDT) of parts, materials or systems through the imaging of the temperature fields, gradients and/or patterns ("thermograms") at the object's surface. It is distinguished from medical thermography by the subjects being examined: thermographic inspection generally examines inanimate objects, while medical thermography generally examines living organisms. Generally, thermographic inspection is performed using an infrared sensor.

Acoustic microscopy is microscopy that employs very high or ultra high frequency ultrasound. Acoustic microscopes operate non-destructively and penetrate most solid materials to make visible images of internal features, including defects such as cracks, delaminations and voids.

Acoustic radiation force (ARF) is a physical phenomenon resulting from the interaction of an acoustic wave with an obstacle placed along its path. Generally, the force exerted on the obstacle is evaluated by integrating the acoustic radiation pressure over its time-varying surface.

Acoustic resonance spectroscopy (ARS) is a method of spectroscopy in the acoustic region, primarily the sonic and ultrasonic regions. ARS is typically much more rapid than HPLC and NIR. It is non destructive and requires no sample preparation as the sampling waveguide can simply be pushed into a sample powder/liquid or in contact with a solid sample. To date, the AR spectrometer has successfully differentiated and quantified sample analytes in various forms;. It has been used to measure and monitor the progression of chemical reactions, such as the setting and hardening of concrete from cement paste to solid. Acoustic spectrometry has also been used to measure the volume fraction of colloids in a dispersion medium, as well as for the investigation of physical properties of colloidal dispersions, such as aggregation and particle size distribution. Typically, these experiments are carried out with sinusoidal excitation signals and the experimental observation of signal attenuation. From a comparison of theoretical attenuation to experimental observation, the particle size distribution and aggregation phenomena are inferred.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Acoustic metamaterial</span> Material designed to manipulate sound waves

An acoustic metamaterial, sonic crystal, or phononic crystal is a material designed to control, direct, and manipulate sound waves or phonons in gases, liquids, and solids. Sound wave control is accomplished through manipulating parameters such as the bulk modulus β, density ρ, and chirality. They can be engineered to either transmit, or trap and amplify sound waves at certain frequencies. In the latter case, the material is an acoustic resonator.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Whispering-gallery wave</span> Wave that can travel around a concave surface

Whispering-gallery waves, or whispering-gallery modes, are a type of wave that can travel around a concave surface. Originally discovered for sound waves in the whispering gallery of St Paul's Cathedral, they can exist for light and for other waves, with important applications in nondestructive testing, lasing, cooling and sensing, as well as in astronomy.

Reflectometry is a general term for the use of the reflection of waves or pulses at surfaces and interfaces to detect or characterize objects, sometimes to detect anomalies as in fault detection and medical diagnosis.

Acoustic tweezers are used to manipulate the position and movement of very small objects with sound waves. Strictly speaking, only a single-beam based configuration can be called acoustical tweezers. However, the broad concept of acoustical tweezers involves two configurations of beams: single beam and standing waves. The technology works by controlling the position of acoustic pressure nodes that draw objects to specific locations of a standing acoustic field. The target object must be considerably smaller than the wavelength of sound used, and the technology is typically used to manipulate microscopic particles.

Nuclear acoustic resonance is a phenomenon closely related to nuclear magnetic resonance. It involves utilizing ultrasound and ultrasonic acoustic waves of frequencies between 1 MHz and 100 MHz to determine the acoustic radiation resulted from interactions of particles that experience nuclear spins as a result of magnetic and/or electric fields. The principles of nuclear acoustic resonance are often compared with nuclear magnetic resonance, specifically its usage in conjunction with nuclear magnetic resonance systems for spectroscopy and related imaging methodologies. Due to this, it is denoted that nuclear acoustic resonance can be used for the imaging of objects as well. However, for most cases, nuclear acoustic resonance requires the presence of nuclear magnetic resonance to induce electron spins within specimens in order for the absorption of acoustic waves to occur. Research conducted through experimental and theoretical investigations relative to the absorption of acoustic radiation of different materials, ranging from metals to subatomic particles, have deducted that nuclear acoustic resonance has its specific usages in other fields other than imaging. Experimental observations of nuclear acoustic resonance was first obtained in 1963 by Alers and Fleury in solid aluminum.

Levitation based inertial sensing is a new and rapidly growing technique for measuring linear acceleration, rotation and orientation of a body. Based on this technique, inertial sensors such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, enables ultra-sensitive inertial sensing. For example, the world's best accelerometer used in the LISA Pathfinder in-flight experiment is based on a levitation system which reaches a sensitivity of and noise of .

References

  1. 1 2 3 Andrade, Marco A. B.; Pérez, Nicolás; Adamowski, Julio C. (2018-04-01). "Review of Progress in Acoustic Levitation". Brazilian Journal of Physics. 48 (2): 190–213. Bibcode:2018BrJPh..48..190A. doi:10.1007/s13538-017-0552-6. ISSN   1678-4448. S2CID   125461009.
  2. Andrade, Marco A. B.; Marzo, Asier; Adamowski, Julio C. (2020). "Acoustic levitation in mid-air: Recent advances, challenges, and future perspectives". Appl. Phys. Lett. AIP Publishing. 116 (25): 250501. Bibcode:2020ApPhL.116y0501A. doi: 10.1063/5.0012660 . hdl: 2454/39386 . ISSN   0003-6951.
  3. Lenshof, Andreas; Laurell, Thomas (2014), "Acoustophoresis", in Bhushan, Bharat (ed.), Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology, Springer Netherlands, pp. 1–6, doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6178-0_423-2, ISBN   978-94-007-6178-0
  4. "Ultrasonic Levitation". 2006-11-04. Archived from the original on 2006-11-04. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
  5. WANG, T.; SAFFREN, M.; ELLEMAN, D. (1974-01-30). "Acoustic chamber for weightless positioning". 12th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. doi:10.2514/6.1974-155.
  6. Kim, Meeri (July 15, 2013). "Sound waves can be used to levitate and move objects, study says". The Washington Post.
  7. 1 2 3 Foresti, Daniele; Nabavi, Majid; Klingauf, Mirko; Ferrari, Aldo; Poulikakos, Dimos (2013-07-30). "Acoustophoretic contactless transport and handling of matter in air". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 110 (31): 12549–12554. Bibcode:2013PNAS..11012549F. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1301860110 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   3732964 . PMID   23858454.
  8. 1 2 3 Marzo, Asier; Drinkwater, Bruce W. (2019-01-02). "Holographic acoustic tweezers". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (1): 84–89. Bibcode:2019PNAS..116...84M. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813047115 . ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   6320506 . PMID   30559177.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Marzo, Asier; Seah, Sue Ann; Drinkwater, Bruce W.; Sahoo, Deepak Ranjan; Long, Benjamin; Subramanian, Sriram (2015-10-27). "Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects". Nature Communications. 6 (1): 8661. Bibcode:2015NatCo...6.8661M. doi:10.1038/ncomms9661. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   4627579 . PMID   26505138.
  10. 1 2 Andrade, Marco A. B.; Camargo, Thales S. A.; Marzo, Asier (2018-12-01). "Automatic contactless injection, transportation, merging, and ejection of droplets with a multifocal point acoustic levitator". Review of Scientific Instruments. 89 (12): 125105. Bibcode:2018RScI...89l5105A. doi:10.1063/1.5063715. hdl: 2454/33737 . ISSN   0034-6748. PMID   30599572. S2CID   58578863.
  11. 1 2 "Acoustic Levitator: 25 Steps (with Pictures)". 2018-01-01. Archived from the original on 2018-01-01. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Marzo, Asier; Barnes, Adrian; Drinkwater, Bruce W. (2017-08-01). "TinyLev: A multi-emitter single-axis acoustic levitator". Review of Scientific Instruments. 88 (8): 085105. Bibcode:2017RScI...88h5105M. doi: 10.1063/1.4989995 . hdl: 1983/0a2d97bb-f39c-482c-943b-6745a0ebc453 . ISSN   0034-6748. PMID   28863691.
  13. Bücks, Karl; Müller, Hans (January 1933). "Über einige Beobachtungen an schwingenden Piezoquarzen und ihrem Schallfeld". Zeitschrift für Physik. 84 (1–2): 75–86. Bibcode:1933ZPhy...84...75B. doi:10.1007/bf01330275. ISSN   1434-6001. S2CID   120868972.
  14. 1 2 Clair, Hillary W. St. (November 1949). "Agglomeration of Smoke, Fog, or Dust Particles by Sonic Waves". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 41 (11): 2434–2438. doi:10.1021/ie50479a022. ISSN   0019-7866.
  15. "Archives West: Hillary W. St. Clair papers, 1896-1997". archiveswest.orbiscascade.org. Retrieved 2020-04-06.
  16. St. Clair, Hillary W. (May 1941). "An Electromagnetic Sound Generator for Producing Intense High Frequency Sound". Review of Scientific Instruments. 12 (5): 250–256. Bibcode:1941RScI...12..250S. doi:10.1063/1.1769874. ISSN   0034-6748.
  17. Wang, T. G.; Trinh, E. H.; Croonquist, A. P.; Elleman, D. D. (1986-02-03). "Shapes of rotating free drops: Spacelab experimental results". Physical Review Letters. 56 (5): 452–455. Bibcode:1986PhRvL..56..452W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.452. ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   10033196.
  18. Wang, T. G.; Anilkumar, A. V.; Lee, C. P.; Lin, K. C. (1994-10-10). "Bifurcation of rotating liquid drops: results from USML-1 experiments in Space". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 276: 389–403. Bibcode:1994JFM...276..389W. doi:10.1017/S0022112094002612. hdl: 2060/19950007805 . ISSN   0022-1120. S2CID   123017388.
  19. "Wang". www.astronautix.com. Archived from the original on December 28, 2016. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
  20. 1 2 Whymark, R. R. (1975-11-01). "Acoustic field positioning for containerless processing". Ultrasonics. 13 (6): 251–261. doi:10.1016/0041-624X(75)90072-4. ISSN   0041-624X.
  21. 1 2 Morris, Robert H.; Dye, Elizabeth R.; Docker, Peter; Newton, Michael I. (2019-10-02). "Beyond the Langevin horn: Transducer arrays for the acoustic levitation of liquid drops" (PDF). Physics of Fluids. 31 (10): 101301. Bibcode:2019PhFl...31j1301M. doi:10.1063/1.5117335. ISSN   1070-6631. S2CID   209990197.
  22. Trinh, E. H. (1985-11-01). "Compact acoustic levitation device for studies in fluid dynamics and material science in the laboratory and microgravity". Review of Scientific Instruments. 56 (11): 2059–2065. Bibcode:1985RScI...56.2059T. doi:10.1063/1.1138419. ISSN   0034-6748.
  23. Yarin, A. L.; Pfaffenlehner, M.; Tropea, C. (February 1998). "On the acoustic levitation of droplets". Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 356 (1): 65–91. Bibcode:1998JFM...356...65Y. doi:10.1017/S0022112097007829. ISSN   1469-7645. S2CID   123666920.
  24. 1 2 Xie, W. J.; Cao, C. D.; Lü, Y. J.; Hong, Z. Y.; Wei, B. (2006-11-20). "Acoustic method for levitation of small living animals". Applied Physics Letters. 89 (21): 214102. Bibcode:2006ApPhL..89u4102X. doi:10.1063/1.2396893. ISSN   0003-6951.
  25. Puranen T., Helander P., Meriläinen A., Maconi G., Penttilä A., Gritsevich M., Kassamakov I., Salmi A., Muinonen K., Hæggström E. Multifrequency acoustic levitation. 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), DOI: 10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8926200 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8926200
  26. "Acoustic Levitator". www.instructables.com. Retrieved 2020-04-06.
  27. Cowern, Dianna (2020-04-23). "I built an acoustic LEVITATOR! Making liquid float on air". Youtube. Retrieved 23 April 2020.
  28. 1 2 3 "Soundbender" (PDF). UIST '18: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. October 2018. pp. 247–259. doi: 10.1145/3242587.3242590 .
  29. 1 2 3 Melde, Kai; Mark, Andrew G.; Qiu, Tian; Fischer, Peer (September 2016). "Holograms for acoustics". Nature. 537 (7621): 518–522. Bibcode:2016Natur.537..518M. doi:10.1038/nature19755. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   27652563. S2CID   4403584.
  30. Tian, Zhenhua; Shen, Chen; Li, Junfei; Reit, Eric; Gu, Yuyang; Fu, Hai; Cummer, Steven A.; Huang, Tony Jun (March 2019). "Programmable Acoustic Metasurfaces". Advanced Functional Materials. 29 (13): 1808489. doi:10.1002/adfm.201808489. ISSN   1616-301X. PMC   6527353 . PMID   31123431.
  31. 1 2 3 Marzo, A.; Ghobrial, A.; Cox, L.; Caleap, M.; Croxford, A.; Drinkwater, B. W. (2017-01-02). "Realization of compact tractor beams using acoustic delay-lines". Applied Physics Letters. 110 (1): 014102. Bibcode:2017ApPhL.110a4102M. doi: 10.1063/1.4972407 . hdl: 1983/d0bdf9dd-cd7d-4302-9742-87bcb0d82006 . ISSN   0003-6951.
  32. 1 2 Polychronopoulos, Spyros; Memoli, Gianluca (December 2020). "Acoustic levitation with optimized reflective metamaterials". Scientific Reports. 10 (1): 4254. Bibcode:2020NatSR..10.4254P. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-60978-4. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   7060201 . PMID   32144310.
  33. Norasikin, Mohd Adili; Martinez Plasencia, Diego; Polychronopoulos, Spyros; Memoli, Gianluca; Tokuda, Yutaka; Subramanian, Sriram (2018). "SoundBender". Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (PDF). Uist '18. Berlin, Germany: ACM Press. pp. 247–259. doi:10.1145/3242587.3242590. ISBN   978-1-4503-5948-1. S2CID   52982064.
  34. "Sonic tractor beam invented (w/ Video)". phys.org. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
  35. 1 2 "Acoustic Tractor Beam". www.instructables.com. Retrieved 2020-04-22.
  36. 1 2 Andrade, Marco A. B.; Marzo, Asier (2019-11-01). "Numerical and experimental investigation of the stability of a drop in a single-axis acoustic levitator". Physics of Fluids. 31 (11): 117101. Bibcode:2019PhFl...31k7101A. doi:10.1063/1.5121728. hdl: 2454/37009 . ISSN   1070-6631. S2CID   209926238.
  37. Andrade, Marco A. B.; Polychronopoulos, Spyros; Memoli, Gianluca; Marzo, Asier (2019-03-01). "Experimental investigation of the particle oscillation instability in a single-axis acoustic levitator". AIP Advances. 9 (3): 035020. Bibcode:2019AIPA....9c5020A. doi: 10.1063/1.5078948 . hdl: 2454/35368 .
  38. Rayleigh, Lord (March 1902). "XXXIV. On the pressure of vibrations". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 3 (15): 338–346. doi:10.1080/14786440209462769. ISSN   1941-5982.
  39. Rayleigh, Lord (September 1905). "XLII. On the momentum and pressure of gaseous vibrations, and on the connexion with the virial theorem". The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science. 10 (57): 364–374. doi:10.1080/14786440509463381. ISSN   1941-5982.
  40. King, Louis V. (1934-11-15). "On the acoustic radiation pressure on spheres". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 147 (861): 212–240. Bibcode:1934RSPSA.147..212K. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1934.0215 . ISSN   0080-4630.
  41. Rajabi, Majid; Behzad, Mehdi (2014-03-01). "Point Source Stimulated Acoustic Radiation of Cylindrical Shells: Resonance and Background Fields". Acta Acustica United with Acustica. 100 (2): 215–225. doi:10.3813/aaa.918701. ISSN   1610-1928.
  42. "Soviet Physics—Doklady". Physics Today. 14 (5): 47. May 1961. doi:10.1063/1.3057553. ISSN   0031-9228.
  43. Bruus, Henrik (2012). "Acoustofluidics 7: The acoustic radiation force on small particles". Lab on a Chip. 12 (6): 1014–21. doi:10.1039/c2lc21068a. ISSN   1473-0197. PMID   22349937.
  44. Maconi G., Helander P., Gritsevich M., Salmi A., Penttilä A., Kassamakov I., Hæggström E., Muinonen K. 4π Scatterometer: A new technique for understanding the general and complete scattering properties of particulate media. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 2020, V. 246, 106910, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2020.106910
  45. Andrade, Marco A. B.; Adamowski, Julio C. (September 2016). "Acoustic radiation force on a sphere in an acoustic levitation device". 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). pp. 1–4. doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.2016.7728864. ISBN   978-1-4673-9897-8. S2CID   41284471.
  46. 1 2 3 Andrade, Marco A. B.; Ramos, Tiago S.; Adamowski, Julio C.; Marzo, Asier (2020-02-03). "Contactless pick-and-place of millimetric objects using inverted near-field acoustic levitation". Applied Physics Letters. 116 (5): 054104. Bibcode:2020ApPhL.116e4104A. doi:10.1063/1.5138598. hdl: 2454/36988 . ISSN   0003-6951. S2CID   212756370.
  47. Helander P., Puranen T., Meriläinen A., Maconi G., Penttilä A., Gritsevich M., Kassamakov I., Salmi A., Muinonen K., Hæggström E. Omnidirectional microscopy by ultrasonic sample control. Applied Physics Letters 2020, V. 116, 194101, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0002602
  48. 1 2 3 Inoue, Seki; Mogami, Shinichi; Ichiyama, Tomohiro; Noda, Akihito; Makino, Yasutoshi; Shinoda, Hiroyuki (2019-01-01). "Acoustical boundary hologram for macroscopic rigid-body levitation". The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 145 (1): 328–337. arXiv: 1708.05988 . Bibcode:2019ASAJ..145..328I. doi: 10.1121/1.5087130 . ISSN   0001-4966. PMID   30710964.
  49. Helander, Petteri; Haggstrom, Edward; Puranen, Tuomas; Merilainen, Antti; Maconi, Goran; Penttila, Antti; Gritsevich, Maria; Kassamakov, Ivan; Salmi, Ari; Muinonen, Karri (October 2019). "Simulating Acoustic Orientation Trapping for Stable Levitation". 2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS). Glasgow, United Kingdom: IEEE. pp. 650–653. doi:10.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8925843. hdl: 10138/322114 . ISBN   978-1-7281-4596-9. S2CID   209322164.
  50. Stein, M., Keller, S., Luo, Y., Ilic, O. (2022). "Shaping contactless radiation forces through anomalous acoustic scattering". Nature Communications. 13 (1): 6533. arXiv: 2204.04137 . Bibcode:2022NatCo..13.6533S. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34207-7. ISSN   2041-1723. PMC   9626492 . PMID   36319654.
  51. Habibi, Ruhollah; Devendran, Citsabehsan; Neild, Adrian (2017). "Trapping and patterning of large particles and cells in a 1D ultrasonic standing wave". Lab on a Chip. 17 (19): 3279–3290. doi:10.1039/C7LC00640C. ISSN   1473-0197. PMID   28840206.
  52. 1 2 Cox, L.; Croxford, A.; Drinkwater, B. W.; Marzo, A. (2018-07-30). "Acoustic Lock: Position and orientation trapping of non-spherical sub-wavelength particles in mid-air using a single-axis acoustic levitator". Applied Physics Letters. 113 (5): 054101. Bibcode:2018ApPhL.113e4101C. doi:10.1063/1.5042518. hdl: 1983/a18b40a6-d392-4e69-847c-26bfea65f352 . ISSN   0003-6951. S2CID   126387250.
  53. 1 2 Marzo, Asier; Caleap, Mihai; Drinkwater, Bruce W. (2018-01-22). "Acoustic Virtual Vortices with Tunable Orbital Angular Momentum for Trapping of Mie Particles". Physical Review Letters. 120 (4): 044301. Bibcode:2018PhRvL.120d4301M. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.044301 . hdl: 1983/681ab143-7d53-4642-a859-8f0364394174 . ISSN   0031-9007. PMID   29437423.
  54. Andrade, Marco A. B.; Bernassau, Anne L.; Adamowski, Julio C. (2016-07-25). "Acoustic levitation of a large solid sphere". Applied Physics Letters. 109 (4): 044101. Bibcode:2016ApPhL.109d4101A. doi:10.1063/1.4959862. ISSN   0003-6951.
  55. BBC Earth (2019-12-10). "The Edge of Science". YouTube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-19. Retrieved 2020-04-23.
  56. Ueha, Sadayuki; Hashimoto, Yoshiki; Koike, Yoshikazu (2000-03-01). "Non-contact transportation using near-field acoustic levitation". Ultrasonics. 38 (1): 26–32. doi:10.1016/S0041-624X(99)00052-9. ISSN   0041-624X. PMID   10829622.
  57. Wijaya, Harri; Latifi, Kourosh; Zhou, Quan (April 2019). "Two-Dimensional Manipulation in Mid-Air Using a Single Transducer Acoustic Levitator". Micromachines. 10 (4): 257. doi: 10.3390/mi10040257 . PMC   6523525 . PMID   31003415.
  58. Doerr, Frederik; Burns, Lee; Lee, Becky; Hinds, Jeremy; Davis-Harrison, Rebecca; Frank, Scott; Florence, Alastair (2020). "Peptide Isolation via Spray Drying: Particle Formation, Process Design and Implementation for the Production of Spray Dried Glucagon". Pharmaceutical Research. 37 (12): 255. doi: 10.1007/s11095-020-02942-5 . PMC   7736029 . PMID   33319329.
  59. Doerr, Frederik; Oswald, Iain; Florence, Alastair (2018). "Quantitative investigation of particle formation of a model pharmaceutical formulation using single droplet evaporation experiments and X-ray tomography". Advanced Powder Technology. 29 (12): 2996–3006. doi:10.1016/j.apt.2018.09.027. S2CID   139988412.
  60. Sloth, Jakob; Kiil, Søren; Jensen, Anker; Andersen, Sune; Jørgensen, Kåre; Schiffter, Heiko; Lee, Geoffrey (2006). "Model based analysis of the drying of a single solution droplet in an ultrasonic levitator". Chemical Engineering Science. 61 (8): 2701–2709. Bibcode:2006ChEnS..61.2701S. doi:10.1016/j.ces.2005.11.051.
  61. Watanabe, Ayumu; Hasegawa, Koji; Abe, Yutaka (December 2018). "Contactless Fluid Manipulation in Air: Droplet Coalescence and Active Mixing by Acoustic Levitation". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 10221. Bibcode:2018NatSR...810221W. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-28451-5. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   6033947 . PMID   29977060.
  62. Tsujino, Soichiro; Tomizaki, Takashi (2016-05-06). "Ultrasonic acoustic levitation for fast frame rate X-ray protein crystallography at room temperature". Scientific Reports. 6 (1): 25558. Bibcode:2016NatSR...625558T. doi:10.1038/srep25558. ISSN   2045-2322. PMC   4858681 . PMID   27150272.
  63. P, Aller; D, Axford; P.t, Docker; E.r, Dye; R.h, Morris; M.i, Newton; A.m, Orville (2018-05-13). "The developments of a Helium Acoustic Levitation Environment for time resolved XFEL experiments". TechConnect Briefs. 1 (2018): 36–39.
  64. Youssefi, Omid; Diller, Eric (April 2019). "Contactless Robotic Micromanipulation in Air Using a Magneto-Acoustic System". IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters. 4 (2): 1580–1586. doi:10.1109/LRA.2019.2896444. ISSN   2377-3766. S2CID   67872033.
  65. ,"Free-Form Spatial 3-D Printing Using Part Levitation",issued 2014-07-29
  66. Fushimi, Tatsuki; Marzo, Asier; Drinkwater, Bruce W.; Hill, Thomas L. (2019-08-05). "Acoustophoretic volumetric displays using a fast-moving levitated particle" (PDF). Applied Physics Letters. 115 (6): 064101. Bibcode:2019ApPhL.115f4101F. doi:10.1063/1.5113467. hdl: 2454/36412 . ISSN   0003-6951. S2CID   201271065.
  67. Hirayama, Ryuji; Martinez Plasencia, Diego; Masuda, Nobuyuki; Subramanian, Sriram (November 2019). "A volumetric display for visual, tactile and audio presentation using acoustic trapping". Nature. 575 (7782): 320–323. Bibcode:2019Natur.575..320H. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1739-5. ISSN   1476-4687. PMID   31723288. S2CID   207986492.
  68. Fushimi, Tatsuki; Marzo, Asier; Drinkwater, Bruce W.; Hill, Thomas L. (2019-08-05). "Acoustophoretic volumetric displays using a fast-moving levitated particle" (PDF). Applied Physics Letters. 115 (6): 064101. Bibcode:2019ApPhL.115f4101F. doi:10.1063/1.5113467. hdl: 2454/36412 . ISSN   0003-6951. S2CID   201271065.