![]() Atonement cover | |
Author | Ian McEwan |
---|---|
Cover artist | Chris Frazer Smith |
Language | English |
Publisher | Jonathan Cape |
Publication date | 2001 |
Publication place | United Kingdom |
Media type | Print (hardcover) |
Pages | 371 pp |
ISBN | 0-224-06252-2 (first edition) |
OCLC | 47231087 |
Atonement is a 2001 British metafictional novel written by Ian McEwan. Set in three time periods, 1935 England, Second World War England and France, and present-day England, it covers an upper-class girl's half-innocent mistake that ruins lives, her adulthood in the shadow of that mistake, and a reflection on the nature of writing.
Widely regarded as one of McEwan's best works, it was shortlisted for the 2001 Booker Prize for fiction. [1] In 2010, Time magazine named Atonement in its list of the 100 greatest English-language novels since 1923. [2]
In 2007, the book was adapted into a BAFTA and Academy Award-winning film of the same title, starring Saoirse Ronan, James McAvoy, and Keira Knightley, and directed by Joe Wright.
Briony Tallis, a 13-year-old English girl with a talent for writing, lives at her family's country estate with her parents Jack and Emily Tallis, who are members of the landed gentry. Her older sister Cecilia has recently graduated from the University of Cambridge with Robbie Turner, the Tallis family housekeeper's son and Cecilia's childhood friend, whose university education was funded by Jack Tallis.
In the summer of 1935, Briony's maternal cousins, 15-year-old Lola and 9-year-old twins Jackson and Pierrot, visit the family amidst their parents' divorce. Briony and Cecilia's older brother Leon returns from London, accompanied by his friend from Oxford, the well-off manufacturer Paul Marshall. Cecilia and Robbie bicker over a vase, which breaks and falls into a pond. Cecilia strips to her underwear and dives in to retrieve the pieces, surprising Robbie. Briony, watching from a window, is confused and intrigued by Cecilia and Robbie's actions. She is inspired to begin writing psychological realism, and the reader is informed that this will eventually become a hallmark of her fiction.
In the wake of the incident by the pond, Robbie realizes he is attracted to Cecilia, and writes several drafts of a love letter to her. He gives the letter to Briony to deliver to Cecilia; however, he inadvertently gives her a version he had meant to discard, which contains lewd references ("In my dreams I kiss your cunt"). By the time Robbie realizes his mistake, Briony has already returned to the house with his letter.
Despite Robbie's instructions to the contrary, Briony opens the letter and reads it. She is shocked by its vulgar language, and becomes convinced that Robbie intends to harm Cecilia. An injured Lola goes to Briony for comfort, claiming that her younger brothers attacked her, although it is implied to have instead been Paul Marshall, who has a long scratch on his face. Briony relays the contents of the letter to Lola, who labels Robbie a "maniac," re-affirming Briony's feelings. Robbie arrives at the main house for a family dinner party, and is confronted by Cecilia. He confesses his feelings to her, and she responds in kind. Later the same evening, Briony walks in on Robbie and Cecilia having sex in the library. The immature Briony believes she interrupted a vicious assault on Cecilia, and stands stunned while Robbie and Cecilia quickly exit.
At the dinner, which is generally tense, it is discovered the twins have run away. The party breaks into teams to search for them. When Cecilia goes with Leon, Robbie and Briony each set off on their own. In the darkness, while everyone is searching for the twins, Briony discovers her cousin Lola being raped by an assailant neither girl can clearly see. The attacker flees. Briony, convinced that it must have been Robbie, gets Lola to agree that she likely heard Robbie's voice. The girls return home, and Briony identifies Robbie to the police as the rapist, claiming she saw his face in the dark. Lola is sedated by the local doctor, Cecilia screams at Briony and locks herself in her room, and Paul Marshall shares cigarettes with the policemen.
Robbie does not return, and the family and police officers stay awake waiting for him. As dawn breaks, Robbie appears in the driveway with Jackson and Pierrot, having found and rescued them. He is arrested on the spot and taken away, with only Cecilia and his mother believing his protestations of innocence. Briony is satisfied by this conclusion to her mythologized version of the events, with her as the hero and Robbie as the villain.
By the time the Second World War has started, Robbie has spent several years in prison. He and Cecilia have passed several years exchanging letters, maintaining their love for each other. Robbie is released from prison on the condition he enlist in the army. Meanwhile, Cecilia has completed training as a nurse, and cut off all contact with her family for the parts they played in locking Robbie up. Shortly before Robbie is deployed to France, they meet once for half an hour, during Cecilia's lunch break. Their reunion starts awkwardly, but they share a kiss before leaving each other.
In France, the war is going badly, and the army is retreating to Dunkirk. As the injured Robbie makes his way there, he thinks about his love for Cecilia and his hatred for Briony. However, he eventually concludes that Briony was too young to be blamed fully, and writes Cecilia a letter encouraging her to reconnect with her family. His condition deteriorates over the course of the section; he weakens and becomes delirious. Robbie falls asleep in Dunkirk, one day before the evacuation begins.
A remorseful Briony, now eighteen years old, has refused her place at Cambridge and instead is a trainee nurse in London. She has realised the full extent of her mistake and decides it was Paul Marshall, Leon's friend, whom she saw with Lola.
Briony still writes fiction, and receives a letter from Cyril Connolly at the hospital where she works. Cyril is rejecting Briony's submitted draft of her latest work to his magazine, Horizon, but providing kindly and constructive feedback. The reader comes to realise that the work is in fact the first draft of the first section of this novel, and by reading that section again may ascertain that at some point in the future, Briony takes on board some of the feedback she received.
Briony travels to attend the wedding of Paul Marshall and her cousin Lola, with the knowledge that Lola is marrying her rapist. Briony considers speaking up during the wedding, but does not. Afterwards, she visits Cecilia, who is cold but invites Briony in nonetheless. While Briony is apologizing to Cecilia, Robbie unexpectedly appears from the bedroom. He has been living with Cecilia while he is on leave from the army. Robbie expresses his fury at Briony, but with Cecilia's soothing remains civil.
Cecilia and Robbie both refuse to forgive Briony, who nonetheless tells them she will try to put things right. She promises to begin the legal procedures needed to exonerate Robbie, even though Paul Marshall will never be held responsible for his crime because of his marriage to Lola. As Briony leaves Cecilia's, she is optimistic about her role in Robbie's exoneration, thinking that it will be "a new draft, an atonement" and that she is ready to begin.
The final section, titled "London 1999", is narrated by Briony herself in the form of a diary entry. Now 77, she is a successful novelist who has recently been diagnosed with vascular dementia, so she is facing rapid mental decline.
It is confirmed that Briony is the author of the preceding three sections of the novel. She attends a party in her honor at the Tallis family home, where the extended Tallis children perform The Trials of Arabella, the play that 13-year-old Briony had written and unsuccessfully attempted to stage with her cousins in the summer of 1935. Leon and Pierrot are in attendance, Jackson is fifteen years deceased, and Lola is alive but does not attend. Finally, Briony reveals to the reader that Robbie Turner died of septicaemia on the beaches of Dunkirk, that Cecilia was killed several months later when a bomb destroyed Balham Underground station during the Blitz, and that Briony's story of seeing them together in 1940 was a fabrication. Briony did attend Lola's wedding to Paul Marshall, but confesses she was too "cowardly" to visit the recently bereaved Cecilia to make amends. The novel, which she says is factually true apart from Robbie and Cecilia being reunited, is her lifelong attempt at "atonement" for what she did to them.
Briony justifies her invented happy ending by saying she does not see what purpose it would serve to give readers a "pitiless" story. She writes, "I like to think that it isn't weakness or evasion, but a final act of kindness, a stand against oblivion and despair, to let my lovers live and to unite them at the end."
Atonement contains intertextual references to a number of other literary works, including Gray's Anatomy , Virginia Woolf's The Waves , Thomas Hardy's Jude the Obscure , Henry James' The Golden Bowl , Jane Austen's Northanger Abbey , Samuel Richardson's Clarissa , Vladimir Nabokov's Lolita , Rosamond Lehmann's Dusty Answer , [3] and Shakespeare's The Tempest , Macbeth , Hamlet , and Twelfth Night . McEwan has also said that he was directly influenced by L.P. Hartley's The Go-Between . [4]
Atonement references two real-life literary critics: Cyril Connolly and Elizabeth Bowen.
Briony Tallis's lifelong guilt and efforts to atone for a false accusation form a central theme. Scholars observe that Briony's fictional retelling of events encapsulates the impossibility of achieving genuine atonement, as she can only construct an alternative interpretation of the truth rather than reversing her past actions. McEwan depicts her narrative as a form of self-confession; however, it ultimately fails to redeem her character, illustrating the limitations of storytelling as a mechanism for atonement. [5] [6] [7]
Atonement is a metafictional work that questions the reliability of narrative and memory, with Briony's role as an unreliable narrator underscoring the tension between storytelling and historical accuracy. The novel further explores whether literature can serve as a moral or redemptive force, as Briony herself ponders whether a novelist can achieve atonement when they control outcomes like a god. [6] [8]
McEwan explores class tensions through Robbie Turner's working-class background, which makes him a vulnerable target for Briony's false accusation. His relationship with Cecilia not only challenges the rigid boundaries of class but also emphasizes the social hierarchies that create barriers between them. The novel juxtaposes Robbie's financial struggles with Paul Marshall's privilege, illustrating how class influences perceptions of guilt and innocence. [7] [9] [10]
The Dunkirk evacuation provides a vivid backdrop, showcasing the horrors of war and its psychological impact on soldiers like Robbie. McEwan's portrayal aligns with historical critiques of British military leadership during WWII. [6] [7]
Upon release, Atonement was generally well-received among the British press. [11] [12] The Daily Telegraph reported on reviews from several publications with a rating scale for the novel out of "Love It", "Pretty Good", "Ok", and "Rubbish": Daily Telegraph , Times , Independent , Sunday Telegraph , and Sunday Times reviews under "Love It" and Independent On Sunday review under "Pretty Good" and New Statesman review under "Ok" and Spectator review under "Rubbish". [13] The Guardian gave the novel an average rating of 7.4 out of 10 based on reviews from multiple British newspapers. [14] The Daily Mail critiqued the second half of the book calling the first half "far superior". [15] Sunday Telegraph praised the work, highlighting its "blazing originality". [16] In Literary Review , Martyn Bedford wrote: "The skill and compassion that McEwan invests in the unfolding of this tragic love story are exceptional." [17] The book was also very well-received amongst American press. According to Book Marks , the book received a "rave" consensus based on ten critic reviews: nine "rave" and one "positive". [18] On the Summer 2002 issue of Bookmarks , the book was scored four and a half out of five stars. [19] The New Republic called it McEwan's "finest and most complex novel". [20] The New Yorker praised the work calling the writing "conspicuously good", but also criticized the writing saying "this goodness turns out to be, eventually, a subject of criticism in a droll show of artistic self-reference". [21] ReviewofBooks said on critics consensus, "This is the faint outline of a novel about childhood, love, and war by acclaimed British novelist Ian McEwan that has garnered high praise from all quarters. The New York Times calls Atonement "his most complete and compassionate work to date". [22] Globally, the work was received generally well with Complete Review saying on the consensus "Only a few with a few reservations -- but most are very, very impressed". [23]
In late 2006, the agent for the late romance and historical author Lucilla Andrews accused McEwan of failing to give Andrews sufficient credit for material on wartime nursing in London sourced from her 1977 autobiography No Time for Romance. McEwan, who had faced similar accusations before (see The Cement Garden § Controversy), denied any wrongdoing while acknowledging Andrews' influence. He noted that she was credited in the acknowledgments of Atonement and defended his use of historical research, emphasizing that novelists frequently draw from real-life sources. [30] [31]
Several prominent authors, including John Updike, Martin Amis, Margaret Atwood, Thomas Keneally, Zadie Smith, and the reclusive Thomas Pynchon, publicly defended McEwan against the allegations, arguing that drawing on historical sources is a legitimate literary practice. [32] [33]
Atonement has also faced criticism for its portrayal of false rape accusations. The central plot revolves around Briony Tallis, a 13-year-old girl who wrongly accuses Robbie Turner of raping her cousin, leading to his imprisonment and the tragic unravelling of multiple lives. Some critics argue that the novel's depiction of a false accusation could reinforce harmful misconceptions about sexual violence, given that false allegations are statistically rare. [34]
Discussions on literary forums and social media platforms, such as Reddit, have highlighted concerns that McEwan has employed false rape accusations in multiple works, potentially perpetuating a harmful stereotype. [35]
The novel's conclusion has also generated debate regarding its ethical implications. In the final section, Briony Tallis, now an elderly novelist, reveals that she has rewritten history in her fictionalized account, allowing Robbie and Cecilia to be reunited in her novel, despite their actual fates. Some literary scholars argue that this metafictional twist raises questions about the moral responsibilities of storytelling and whether Briony's act constitutes true atonement. [36] Others suggest that the novel critiques the power of writers to manipulate history, blurring the line between truth and fiction in an unsettling way. [37]
These aspects of the novel have sparked broader discussions about the responsibilities of authors when depicting sensitive subjects and the role of fiction in addressing historical and moral injustices.
The novel was initially named An Atonement. Historian Tim Garton-Ash, to whom McEwan often shows his book drafts, persuaded McEwan to change the title at the last minute. [38]
It was first published by then publishing director Dan Franklin, Jonathan Cape, London, the UK in 2001. The first American edition was published by Nan A. Talese/Doubleday in April 2002. The first audio book is by Recorded Books, 2002 and read by Jill Tanner. [39]
The first edition cover image, designed by Suzanne Dean, depicts a girl wearing a summer dress sitting on the stairs of a country house. John Wilson of BBC4 describes it as having "a pensive quality, almost a weariness". This picture was taken only after the girl had been photographed for hours, getting frustrated and tapping her foot in a fury. [38] [40] [41] [42] [43]
A film adaptation, directed by Joe Wright from a screenplay by Christopher Hampton, was released by Working Title Films in September 2007 in the United Kingdom and in December 2007 in the United States. The film, starring James McAvoy and Keira Knightley, was a commercial and critical success, and won an Oscar for Best Original Score.
In 2023, the novel was adapted for ballet by Cathy Marston, with a score composed by Laura Rossi, sets designed by Michael Levine, and costumes by Bregje Van Balen. [44] The ballet had its world premiere at Ballet Zurich on April 28, before its U.S. premiere in October by the Joffrey Ballet at the Lyric Opera in Chicago. [45] [46] The adaptation was lauded by critics as "Marston's finest ballet to date." [47] When McEwan saw the world premiere of the ballet in April of 2023, he noted that the performance allowed himself to "fully experience the emotion" of his novel for the first time and found it to be "very very powerful, emotionally, to see bodies speaking the narrative." [48] [49]