Brain of Vladimir Lenin

Last updated

The anatomical study of Vladimir Lenin's brain by the German neurologist and psychiatrist Oskar Vogt in 1924 was a significant event in the history of neuroscience. The study aimed to understand the neural basis of Lenin's political and intellectual abilities. The research was conducted at the request of the Soviet government, which wanted to prove that Lenin's supposed genius was the result of his brain's superior structure. [1] Under Vogt's leadership, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Brain Research in Berlin was established, and the study of Lenin's brain was one of the institute's first major projects. [2] The histological analysis methods used to examine tissue samples and helped establish the procedure as a viable way of studying the brain. Though certain structural aspects in Lenin's brain had been said to contribute to heightened cognitive ability, Vogt was nonetheless unable to identify any particular region within Lenin's brain which provided structural proof to Lenin's genius abilities. [3] While the study has limitations and controversies, it is significant in the context of the field of neuropsychology. [4]

Contents

Cover of the Journal Meditsinskii Rabotnik (Medical Worker) (1927) No. 47: "Prof. Fokht za izucheniem srezov mozga Lenina" (Professor Vogt investigating histological sections from Lenin's brain) Vogt Lenin.JPG
Cover of the Journal Meditsinskii Rabotnik (Medical Worker) (1927) No. 47: "Prof. Fokht za izucheniem srezov mozga Lenina" (Professor Vogt investigating histological sections from Lenin’s brain)

Context

The study and dissection of Lenin's brain is directly attributed to the field of phrenology, the neuroscientific field developed by Franz Joseph Gall that examines the relationship between mental ability and brain structure. [5] [6] The reasons behind dissecting Lenin's brain was by no means a pursuit of Soviet deification of Lenin, nor was it a unique event; rather, it was due to the fact that Lenin was considered to be a genius and that his geniusness was identifiable within his brain structure. [7]

The historical search for biological roots of extraordinary brain capacity was of particular interest throughout the 19th and 20th centuries. It built off of Franz Joseph Gall's late 18th century idea that it would be scientifically beneficial to examine the brains of geniuses as mental qualities and faculties are derived from the brain. [6] [8] In conjunction with the lifelong consideration of Lenin as one of the greatest geniuses of the time, the immediate action to examine his brain upon his death sought to provide insight on the relationship between intellectual capabilities and brain structure. [5] The expectation of the results of dissecting Lenin's brain was that due to Lenin being a mentally extraordinary and gifted individual, his brain must be unique and identifiable as such within his brain structure. [5]

Scientific studies and observations

Initial autopsy conducted by Aleksey Abrikosov

Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov's death occurred on January 21, 1924, in Gorki, near Moscow. On January 24, an autopsy was performed by Professor Aleksey Abrikosov, with 27 Russian pathologists and Professor Otfried Foerster in attendance, and his brain was examined. [9] Lenin's brain weighed 1340 grams and showed signs of degeneration, particularly in the left hemisphere. [10] Additionally, two areas of softening were observed in the right occipitotemporal border. The blood vessels above the corpora quadrigemina were congested with blood, and there were signs of hemorrhage. Abrikosov diagnosed the deceased with diffuse atherosclerosis primarily in the brain arteries. However, researchers have since argued that Lenin should have been diagnosed with neurosyphilis or, according to recent studies, with a mutation of the NT5E gene. Given the Soviet Union’s attempts to conceal Lenin's venereal disease as well as to hide his illness entirely, the diagnosis remains up for debate.

Experimentation by Oskar Vogt

Neuroscientists Oskar Vogt and Cecile Vogt-Mugnier Vogt.jpg
Neuroscientists Oskar Vogt and Cécile Vogt-Mugnier

Neuroanatomical research in pursuit of identifying intellectual genius had been a recurrent in Russian universities. Medical faculties collected the brains of medical professors and other notable individuals who had donated their organs for scientific research. Lenin "was considered to be the greatest of geniuses, and his brain was expected to be unique". [5] Therefore, following his death, Oskar Vogt - a neuroanatomist from the University of Berlin - was requested to conduct histological examinations at the Moscow Brain Research Institute  [ ru ]. [11] The institute was especially established for Vogt to conduct analyses on Lenin's brain. [2] Between 1925 and 1927, Vogt conducted a comprehensive analysis of Lenin's brain, involving 153 pages, fifteen albums, and 30,953 brain slices. [12] [13] [14] Some of the methodologies adopted by Vogt included the "cutting, mounting, and staining in serial sections the entire brain" to obtain a "a minute parcellation of the cerebral cortex". [15] The most significant finding was an unusually high number and size of pyramidal cells in the third layer of the cerebral cortex. [16] Vogt called these "association neurons" and were seen as confirmation of Lenin's supposed genius. [11]

On November 10, 1929, Vogt presented his findings to high-ranking officials in the Pantheon Hall of the Moscow Brain Research Institute. [17] The abundance of pyramidal neurons was attributed to Lenin's exceptional intellectual and organizational skills as well as to his rigorous mental training and political activities. [11] Wilder Penfield wrote a letter to his mother in 1929, confirming the validity of Vogt's study on Lenin's brain. According to Penfield, during his visit to the Brain Research Institute in Berlin, he and other visitors were shown many large nerve cells in the third layer of the gray matter of Lenin's brain. The lack of reliable morphometric and statistical controls limited the significance of the cytoarchitectonic observations, but the finding of association neurons was sufficient to please the Politburo without compromising Vogt's integrity or Germany's relationship with Russia. [17] At the presentation, Vogt emphasized the need for further comparative quantitative research including the brains of "elite" individuals, as well as those from diverse ethnic groups. Due to Hitler's rise to power, the changing political climate between Germany and Russia was now bringing an end to their cooperation on neuroscientific research. Vogt’s activities at the Moscow Brain Research Institute ceased and he did not proceed with the comparative experimentation. In 1937, Vogt was fired from the directorship of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Brain Research. [18]

Current validity of Vogt's study

Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov Vladimir Lenin.jpg
Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov

Contrary to Lenin’s autopsy which found many irregularities related to his deteriorated condition upon the last years of his life, the dissection of his brain for the purpose of physically identifying extraordinary mental prowess was generally unreliable. [3] [19] Today it is of general agreement among neuroscientists that broad concepts of genius or extraordinary mental prowess cannot be pinned down to physical locations in the brain. [3] Furthermore, upon the conclusion of the dissection of Lenin's brain, there existed many indications expressing perplexity on the matter amongst the neuroscience community as well as regret within Vogt about potentially overexposing himself in his project. [3] This in turn brings the question of validity and acceptance to the project's conclusions. Despite this, Vogt concluded his dissection of Lenin's brain by exclaiming Lenin to have been "a brain athlete and association giant" with a heightened ability in his brain, a conclusion on Lenin still prevalent to this day. [3] [20]

Doctors behind the dissection

The overseers of the dissection of the brain were a married couple; neurologists Oskar and Cecile Vogt. Born in Husum, Germany, the neuroatonomist graduated from Jena University's medical school in 1893, marrying Cécile six years later. [21] Before they met, Vogt worked in the Burghölzli psychiatric hospital for Auguste Forel where Vogt thoroughly studied hypnosis and the effect it bore on patients and its relations with brain components. [22] [23] As a hypnotist, he advocated for the use of hypermnesia to return suppressed, traumatic memories of patients. Vogt moved to Paris for more extensive training in 1896. [24] By 1914, Vogt was made director of the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute located in Berlin. Together, the Vogts had a significant influence on their field. Amongst their findings, their discovery of the cytoarchitectural organization of the cerebral cortex and thalamus had international influence. [25] The German Empire-era institute was responsible for dissecting the brains of murdered patients, with both Cecile and Oskar studying the brains of the "elite". [26]

Despite the Vogts' work in the KWI, they were opponents of the National Social Party dominating Germany in the following decades. The couple had analysed the supposedly "elite" brains of high-profile figures, but they nevertheless resisted hiring staff based on race, culminating in raids on the KWI building by the Nazi Party. Vogt allegedly threw Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels down the stairs at one point. [26] The regime eventually removed Vogt as the head of the KWI in 1937, replacing him with Hugo Spatz. Vogt’s friend and a Foreign Service official in Germany, Gustav Krupp, eventually helped the former create the German Brain Research Society.

Vogt was not a communist, but a socialist, although he sympathised with the communist beliefs echoed by the Soviet Union, which he found progressive. [11] As a result, upon Russian invitation, Vogt went to Moscow to form the Brain Research Institute in 1924 to study the brain of Vladimir Lenin. By this time, the neurologist had become renowned for his work as a brain researcher and garnered the attention of the Soviet Union. As mentioned previously, Vogt sought to study the brains of those whom he viewed as intellectuals and elite minds with the backing of Germany's Weimar Republic, which wanted to improve relations with Russia. [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Korbinian Brodmann</span> German neuropsychiatrist (1868–1918)

Korbinian Brodmann was a German neuropsychiatrist who is known for mapping the cerebral cortex and defining 52 distinct regions, known as Brodmann areas, based on their cytoarchitectonic (histological) characteristics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaiser Wilhelm Society</span> Defunct German scientific institution

The Kaiser Wilhelm Society for the Advancement of Science was a German scientific institution established in the German Empire in 1911. Its functions were taken over by the Max Planck Society. The Kaiser Wilhelm Society was an umbrella organisation for many institutes, testing stations, and research units created under its authority.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nikolay Timofeev-Ressovsky</span> Soviet biologist (1900–1981)

Nikolay Vladimirovich Timofeev-Ressovsky was a Soviet biologist who, in principle, was a senior scientist in Soviet programs of nuclear and, later in biological weapons. He conducted research in radiation genetics, experimental population genetics, and microevolution. His life was highlighted by scientific achievements in the face of severe personal hardship, including his imprisonment and working in secret scientific facilities of Soviet Gulag.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oskar Vogt</span> German physician and neurologist

Oskar Vogt was a German physician and neurologist. He and his wife Cécile Vogt-Mugnier are known for their extensive cytoarchetectonic studies on the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Otfrid Foerster</span> German neurologist and neurosurgeon

Otfrid Foerster was a German neurologist and neurosurgeon, who made innovative contributions to neurology and neurosurgery, such as rhizotomy for the treatment of spasticity, anterolateral cordotomy for pain, the hyperventilation test for epilepsy, Foerster's syndrome, the first electrocorticogram of a brain tumor, and the first surgeries for epilepsy. He is also known as the first to describe the dermatomes, and he helped map the motor cortex of the cerebrum.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brodmann area 43</span> Brain area

Brodmann area 43, the subcentral area, is a structurally distinct area of the cerebral cortex defined on the basis of cytoarchitecture. Along with Brodmann Area 1, 2, and 3, Brodmann area 43 is a subdivision of the postcentral region of the brain, suggesting a somatosensory function. The histological structure of Area 43 was initially described by Korbinian Brodmann, but it was not labeled on his map of cortical areas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Brain of Albert Einstein</span> Preserved brain of scientist Albert Einstein

The brain of Albert Einstein has been a subject of much research and speculation. Albert Einstein's brain was removed within seven and a half hours of his death. His apparent regularities or irregularities in the brain have been used to support various ideas about correlations in neuroanatomy with general or mathematical intelligence. Studies have suggested an increased number of glial cells in Einstein's brain.

From the ancient Egyptian mummifications to 18th-century scientific research on "globules" and neurons, there is evidence of neuroscience practice throughout the early periods of history. The early civilizations lacked adequate means to obtain knowledge about the human brain. Their assumptions about the inner workings of the mind, therefore, were not accurate. Early views on the function of the brain regarded it to be a form of "cranial stuffing" of sorts. In ancient Egypt, from the late Middle Kingdom onwards, in preparation for mummification, the brain was regularly removed, for it was the heart that was assumed to be the seat of intelligence. According to Herodotus, during the first step of mummification: "The most perfect practice is to extract as much of the brain as possible with an iron hook, and what the hook cannot reach is mixed with drugs." Over the next five thousand years, this view came to be reversed; the brain is now known to be the seat of intelligence, although colloquial variations of the former remain as in "memorizing something by heart".

Nancy Coover Andreasen is an American neuroscientist and neuropsychiatrist. She currently holds the Andrew H. Woods Chair of Psychiatry at the Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine at the University of Iowa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cécile Vogt-Mugnier</span> French neurologist (1875–1962)

Cécile Vogt-Mugnier was a French neurologist from Haute-Savoie. She and her husband Oskar Vogt are known for their extensive cytoarchetecture studies on the brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Max Planck Institute for Brain Research</span> Research institute in Frankfurt, Germany

The Max Planck Institute for Brain Research is located in Frankfurt, Germany. It was founded as Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Brain Research in Berlin 1914, moved to Frankfurt-Niederrad in 1962 and more recently in a new building in Frankfurt-Riedberg. It is one of 83 institutes in the Max Planck Society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Terminal nerve</span> Cranial nerve 0

The terminal nerve, also known as cranial nerve zero or simply as CN 0, is a nerve that was not included in the seminal classification of the cranial nerves as CN I through CN XII, but has since been recognized and listed in TA2. It was discovered by German scientist Gustav Fritsch in 1878 in the brains of sharks, and was first found in humans in 1913. Studies have confirmed that the terminal nerve is a common finding in the adult human brain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marguerite Vogt</span> Cancer biologist

Marguerite Vogt was a cancer biologist and virologist. She was most noted for her research on polio and cancer at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies.

Homo Sapiens 1900 is a 1998 Swedish documentary film directed by Peter Cohen, about various eugenics methods that were in practice in Europe during the first part of the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marthe Vogt</span> German neuroscientist

Marthe Louise Vogt was a German scientist recognized as one of the leading neuroscientists of the twentieth century. She is mainly remembered for her important contributions to the understanding of the role of neurotransmitters in the brain, especially epinephrine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carol A. Barnes</span> American neuroscientist

Carol A. Barnes is an American neuroscientist who is a Regents' Professor of psychology at the University of Arizona. Since 2006, she has been the Evelyn F. McKnight Chair for Learning and Memory in Aging and is director of the Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Institute. Barnes has been president of the Society for Neuroscience and is a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and foreign member of the Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters. She was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 2018.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oskar Fischer</span> Czech scientist (1876–1942)

Oskar Fischer was a Czech academic, psychiatrist and neuropathologist whose studies on dementia and Alzheimer disease were rediscovered in 2008.

Pathoclisis is the theory that certain specialized parts of the brain are the first to be damaged in the case of disease, lack of oxygen, or malnutrition. The selective vulnerability of certain neurons can then lead to the expression of pathology. The APA dictionary of psychology defines pathoclisis as “sensitivity to particular toxins, or the tendency of particular toxins to target certain organs or systems of organ.”

Helena Alexandrovna Timofeeff-Ressovsky was a Russian biologist known for her work in developmental and population genetics and radiation ecology.

The Lieber Institute for Brain Development (LIBD) is a nonprofit research center located in Baltimore, Maryland, that studies brain development issues such as schizophrenia and autism. The cause of most neuropsychiatric disorders remains unknown and current therapies such as antipsychotics and antidepressants treat symptoms rather than the underlying illness. Lieber is working to unravel the biological basis of these brain disorders and is developing therapies to treat or prevent their development.

References

  1. ↑ Klatzo 2002, p. 28.
  2. 1 2 Magoun, Horace W. (1962-03-02), "Development of Brain Research Institutes", Frontiers in Brain Research, Columbia University Press, pp. 1–40, doi:10.7312/fren91252-003, ISBN   978-0-231-88281-1 , retrieved 2023-03-17
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Abbott 2003, p. 249.
  4. ↑ v. Stuckrad-Barre & Danek 2004.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Bentivoglio 1998, p. 291.
  6. 1 2 Richter 2000, p. 352.
  7. ↑ Richter 2000, p. 355.
  8. ↑ Vein, A. A.; Maat-Schieman, M. L. C. (2008-02-01). "Famous Russian brains: historical attempts to understand intelligence". Brain. 131 (2): 583–590. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm326 . ISSN   0006-8950. PMID   18182419.
  9. ↑ Klatzo 2002, pp. 28–29.
  10. ↑ Lerner, V.; Finkelstein, Y.; Witztum, E. (2004). "The enigma of Lenin's (1870-1924) malady". European Journal of Neurology. 11 (6): 371–376. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00839.x. ISSN   1351-5101. PMID   15171732. S2CID   14966309.
  11. 1 2 3 4 Bentivoglio 1998, p. 294.
  12. ↑ Gregory, Paul R. (2008). "Lenin's Brain". Lenin's Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives. 555. Hoover Institution Press. pp. 24–35. ISBN   978-0-8179-4812-2.
  13. ↑ Smith, Kathleen E. (2010). "Review of Lenin's Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives". The Slavonic and East European Review. 88 (4): 776–778. doi:10.1353/see.2010.0012. ISSN   0037-6795. JSTOR   41061940. S2CID   247621906.
  14. ↑ Richter 2000, p. 354.
  15. ↑ Bentivoglio 1998, p. 293.
  16. ↑ Richter 2000, p. 356.
  17. 1 2 Klatzo 2002, p. 32.
  18. ↑ Tumarkin, Nina (2011-01-01). "Lenin's Brain and Other Tales from the Secret Soviet Archives". Canadian-American Slavic Studies. 45 (2): 242–243. doi:10.1163/221023911X556535. ISSN   2210-2396.
  19. ↑ Vinters, Harry; Lurie, Lev; Mackowiak, Philip A. (2013). "Vessels of Stone: Lenin's "Circulatory Disturbance of the Brain"". Human Pathology . 44 (10): 1967–1972. doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2012.11.017. ISSN   0046-8177. PMID   23427870.
  20. ↑ Kreutzberg, Georg W.; Klatzo, Igor; Kleihues, Paul (1992). "Oskar and Cécile Vogt, Lenin's Brain and the Bumble-Bees of the Black Forest". Brain Pathology . 2 (4): 363–364. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1992.tb00712.x . ISSN   1015-6305. PMID   1341969. S2CID   205939477.
  21. ↑ v. Stuckrad-Barre & Danek 2004, pp. 1038–1039.
  22. ↑ Klatzo 2002, pp. 3–4.
  23. ↑ v. Stuckrad-Barre & Danek 2004, p. 1038.
  24. ↑ Bentivoglio 1998, p. 292.
  25. ↑ Zeidman, Lawrence A. (2011). "Neuroscience in Nazi Europe Part II: Resistance against the Third Reich". Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences . 38 (6): 826–838. doi: 10.1017/S0317167100012397 . ISSN   0317-1671. PMID   22030419.
  26. 1 2 Martin, Michael; Karenberg, Axel; Fangerau, Heiner (2020-02-01). "Neuroscientists at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Brain Research in the "Third Reich": Oskar Vogt—Hugo Spatz—Wilhelm Tönnis". Der Nervenarzt (in German). 91 (1): 89–99. doi:10.1007/s00115-019-00847-2. ISSN   1433-0407. PMID   32067090. S2CID   211160289.
  27. ↑ Klatzo 2002, pp. 23, 27–29.

Works cited

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.