Cervical conization

Last updated

Cervical conization
ICD-9-CM 67.2

Cervical conization refers to an excision of a cone-shaped portion of tissue from the mucous membrane of the cervix. Conization is used for diagnostic purposes as part of a biopsy and for therapeutic purposes to remove pre-cancerous cells (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia) or early stage cervical cancer. [1] Ablative treatments are also available to treat abnormal cervical cells. The decision to perform a cervical conization procedure is made with consideration of a patient's pap smear, colposcopy, and HPV test results. ACOG recommends that decisions regarding excision should be based on risk of CIN3+. [2] A conization can be performed in the office or in the operating room, depending on the type of conization performed. This procedure carries few risks, with the most common one being bleeding after the procedure. [1] [3]

Contents

History

Prior to the introduction of the speculum, cervical cancer was only found once it was advanced. With the invention and use of a speculum, changes in the cervix could be appreciated. First, they were evaluated macroscopically and eventually were also assessed using a microscope. In 1927, H. Hinselmann discovered the transformation zone, where metaplastic squamous epithelium is found between the columnar epithelium of the endocervix and the squamous epithelium of the ectocervix. The transformation zone is clinically significant, as it is where almost all cervical cancers and precancerous lesions arise. [4]

All current cervical conization methods can be traced back to amputation of the ectocervix which was developed by Marion Sims in 1861. Prior to this, any excisions of cervical carcinomas were mainly a palliative care treatment option. A. Sturmdorf was the first to describe an excision of a cone shape from the ectocervix, however he utilized this as a treatment for cervicitis. J. E. Ayre was the first to introduce cold knife conization in 1948 and stressed the importance of evaluating the excised tissue in serial sections to assess the extent of invasion. This method of cold knife conization has been utilized and eventually options for excisions using electrocautery were developed as well. Initially, excised tissue utilizing electrocuatery was not satisfactory for evaluation, but as the loops used have become finer, the quality of the surgical specimens have improved to rival those of cold knife conization. Presently, electrocuatery methods are often preferred to cold knife conization due to greater ease of procedure. [4]

Anatomy

Photo illustrating the different cell types located in the cervix Cells of the cervix.jpg
Photo illustrating the different cell types located in the cervix
Image shows relevant anatomy and the transformation zone. Diagram showing the transformation zone on the cervix CRUK 375.svg
Image shows relevant anatomy and the transformation zone.

The cervix connects the uterine cavity to the vagina. The cervix can be viewed by placing a speculum in the vagina. The part of the cervix that can be directly viewed upon placing a speculum in the vagina is the ectocervix. The beginning of the endocervix is called the cervical os. The endocervix leads from the vagina into the uterine cavity. The area where the columnar epithelium of the endocervix and the squamous epithelium of the ectocervix meet is called the transformation zone or the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ). This is the area of the cervix that is most susceptible to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and is where the vast majority of cervical precancers and cancers arise. This is the tissue that is sampled during a pap smear as a screening test to find abnormal cells or the presence of an HPV infection. [1]

Types

Types of conization include: [5] [6]

Indications

Abnormal cervical cells found on pap smear and colposcopy are the basis for the recommendation of a conization procedure. The amount of irregularity will be graded by the pathologist after the colposcopy as CIN1, CIN2, or CIN3. CIN3 represents the most irregular appearing cells of the possible grading options. Conization may be recommended once the risk of CIN3 is greater than 25%. [2] Conization prior to a radical hysterectomy is associated with better outcomes for early -stage cervical cancers as well, so it may be recommended even when hysterectomy will be the definitive surgical option. [7] The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology has developed a tool to aid in decision -making with abnormal cervical cancer screening and abnormal colposcopy results. [8]

Procedure

Cervical Conization surgical sample with sections showing how it will be analyzed Gross preparation of cervical cone.svg
Cervical Conization surgical sample with sections showing how it will be analyzed

The vagina is prepped using antimicrobial scrub or iodine. Draping is placed to maintain a sterile surgical field. Some physicians may choose to drain the bladder using a catheter. The speculum will be placed and the cervix visualized. The tissue is then excised from the cervix. The tissue will include the transformation zone and will be shaped like a cone, as the procedure name suggests. The physician will ensure hemostasis has been achieved prior to removing the speculum and ending the procedure. Typically the physician will place a suture at the 12 o'clock region of the excised tissue to serve as a reference point during histological examination. [1] [9]

The main difference between cold knife conization and LEEP is the instrument used to excise the tissue. In a LEEP, a thin wire loop electrode is used to remove the cone-shaped surgical specimen. During a cold knife cone, a scalpel is used to excise the tissue. Both LEEP and cold knife cone have shown equal effectiveness, so the decision for which procedure is often based on physician comfort with each procedure or other clinical considerations. Cold knife cone is performed with a scalpel and one advantage to this procedure is that the margins of the excised tissue will be free from thermal damage that would be present in the excised tissue from a LEEP. This can allow for more accurate analysis of the margin of the specimen. [1] [9]

Contraindications to completing the procedure are cervicitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, or anticoagulation. Pregnancy is a relative contraindication, meaning that decisions of whether to perform the procedure in pregnant patients would be made on an individual basis. [1]

After treatment, screenings will continue. HPV screening is recommended 6 months after conization. Regular cervical cancer screening will resume as well, with the schedule of screening being determined by the type of abnormal cells that were present in the cervix. HPV vaccination may also be recommended as a part of treatment plan with the goal of reducing the chances of abnormal cervical cells developing again. [3]

Complications

The most common complication of cervical conization is bleeding during the procedure or within a few weeks after the procedure. Infection after the procedure is possible but very rare. There is the possibility of cervical stenosis or cervical insufficiency. The data regarding risk of preterm birth and low birth weight in future pregnancies is mixed, however it is generally accepted that for patients desiring to carry future pregnancies, limiting the amount of cervical tissue that is excised is the best option to limit this risk. However, taking less tissue does produce increased risk that the margins of the excised specimen will be positive, so the decision on how aggressive of an excision is preformed must be discussed between patient and physician. [5] [6] [1] [9]

Cervical conization effectively reduces the risk of cancer developing or spreading. The chances of cancer recurrence and premature birth depends on the type of conization. Cold knife conization is associated with 7% chance of the cancer recurring and 16% chance of premature birth, laser conization comes with 6% cancer recurrence and 13% premature birth, and loop excision comes with 10% recurrence and 11% premature birth. [5] [6]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cooper DB, Carugno J, Menefee GW (2023), "Conization of Cervix", StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing, PMID   28722875 , retrieved 2023-11-16
  2. 1 2 "Updated Guidelines for Management of Cervical Cancer Screening Abnormalities". www.acog.org. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
  3. 1 2 "Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Test Results". www.acog.org. Retrieved 2025-03-16.
  4. 1 2 Reich O, Pickel H (December 2020). "200 years of diagnosis and treatment of cervical precancer". European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology. 255: 165–171. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.037. PMID   33137608.
  5. 1 2 3 Athanasiou A, Veroniki AA, Efthimiou O, Kalliala I, Naci H, Bowden S, et al. (August 2022). "Comparative effectiveness and risk of preterm birth of local treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage IA1 cervical cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis". The Lancet. Oncology. 23 (8): 1097–1108. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00334-5. PMC   9630146 . PMID   35835138.
  6. 1 2 3 "Prevention of cervical cancer: what are the risks and benefits of different treatments?". NIHR Evidence (Plain English summary). U.K.: National Institute for Health and Care Research. 2023-11-10. doi:10.3310/nihrevidence_60599. S2CID   265201829.
  7. Chang CS, Min JS, Song KH, Choi CH, Kim TJ, Lee JW, et al. (2022-08-10). "The Role of Conization before Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer including High Risk Factors of Recurrence: Propensity Score Matching". Cancers. 14 (16): 3863. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163863 . ISSN   2072-6694. PMC   9405990 . PMID   36010857.
  8. "ASCCP Management Guidelines Web Application". app.asccp.org. Retrieved 2025-03-25.
  9. 1 2 3 "Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP)". www.acog.org. Retrieved 2025-03-16.