Ctenobethylus goepperti

Last updated

Ctenobethylus goepperti
Temporal range: Middle Eocene
Ctenobethylus goepperti NHMW1984-31-218 profile left.jpg
Scientific classification OOjs UI icon edit-ltr.svg
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Dolichoderinae
Genus: Ctenobethylus
Species:
C. goepperti
Binomial name
Ctenobethylus goepperti
(Mayr, 1868)
Synonyms
  • Bothriomyrmex goepperti(Mayr, 1868)
  • Ctenobethylus bogdassarovi(Nazaraw, 1994)
  • Ctenobethylus exsectus(Dubovikoff & Dlussky, 2019)
  • Ctenobethylus succinalisBrues, 1939
  • Eldermyrmex exsectusDubovikoff & Dlussky, 2019
  • Hypoclinea goeppertiMayr, 1868
  • Iridomyrmex bogdassaroviNazaraw, 1994
  • Iridomyrmex goepperti(Mayr, 1868)
  • Liometopum bogdassarovi(Nazaraw, 1994)
  • Liometopum goepperti(Mayr, 1868)

Ctenobethylus goepperti is a species of extinct dolichoderine ant found in numerous Eocene amber deposits in northern Europe. It is thought to be closely related to Liometopum, and hypothesized to have a relatively similar ecology with wood-nesting habits, arboreal ecological dominance, association with aphids, and large colonies. They are one of the most commonly encountered ant species in Baltic and Rovno amber, and were prevalent during the Eocene epoch around 40 million years ago. [1]

Contents

Taxonomy

Ctenobethylus goepperti has a long taxonomic history dating back to 1868 when it was initially described as Hypoclinea goepperti by entomologist Gustav Mayr. Since then, it has accumulated a large number of synonyms, namely C. bogdassarovi, C. exsectus, and C. succinalis. After a series of earlier generic transfers to the genera Bothriomyrmex , Iridomyrmex , and Liometopum , C. goepperti was officially transferred to the genus Ctenobethylus in 1997 by Russian paleontologist Gennady Dlussky where it belongs today, and was formerly the sole species of Ctenobethylus from 2002 onwards until Eldermyrmex was merged into it in 2026, adding C. oblongiceps to the genus as well. [2] The genus Ctenobethylus is currently placed within tribe Tapinomini of the subfamily Dolichoderinae based on morphological evidence with analysis of C. goepperti specimens, and thought to be a stem group to the extant Holarctic dolichoderine genus Liometopum. [1]

Etymology

The scientific binomial name Ctenobethylus goepperti is composed of the generic name and the specific name. The genus Ctenobethylus means "comb wasp" from Ancient Greek cteno- (κτείς, "comb") and bethylus (βηθύλος, a type of bird, later applied to a family of wasps), [3] as the original describer of the genus, entomologist Charles Thomas Brues believed it to be a bethylid wasp. The specific epithet is named after Prussian paleontologist Johann Heinrich Robert Göppert. [4]

Identification

The genus Ctenobethylus, which C. goepperti is placed within, is characterized by a heart-shaped head with prominent rear lobes and forward-positioned eyes. The frontal carinae are sharp and widely spaced, and the front edge of the clypeus is straight. The antennal scapes are short and do not reach the back of the head. The body is compact, with a relatively long mesonotum and a propodeum whose upper surface is clearly shorter than its rear surface in side view. The petiole forms a thin, distinct node without an extended posterior projection. [1] Within the genus, the species may be separated from C. oblongiceps by the lack of these characters: a subrectangular head with eyes low and lateral on head capsule, a longitudinal ridge separating the top and side surfaces of a low propodeum, and a broad cone-shaped petiolar node. [5]

Morphology

Solid 3D render of Ctenobethylus goepperti from Goethe's amber collection Ctenobethylus goepperti Boudinot et al. (2026) Fig. 3.png
Solid 3D render of Ctenobethylus goepperti from Goethe's amber collection

Ctenobethylus goepperti exhibits all known traits of the subfamily Dolichoderinae, including the presence of a slit-like gastral orifice and a one-segmented waist consisting of a single petiole. The workers of Ctenobethylus goepperti are polymorphic. The head is trapezoidal with gently curved sides and a shallowly indented rear margin, while the antennal scape is short and does not reach the rear head edge. The eyes are set forward, and ocelli are absent in all workers. The mandibles bear seven to ten teeth, with the terminal teeth largest and sharp, while the remaining teeth become more blunt in larger individuals. Their maxillary palps have six segments and extend about halfway toward the back of the head. The mesosoma shows a narrow but distinct mesopropodeal depression. The propodeum is smoothly rounded in profile, with a short dorsal face and a longer, sloping posterior face; the spiracles are positioned near the transition between the side and rear surfaces. The petiole forms an inclined scale that is longer anteriorly than posteriorly, and from above four abdominal segments are visible. The first abdominal segment is slightly flattened at its front but does not overhang the petiole. [6] All three major forms of this species, the worker, male, and queen, have been discovered and described in detail. [4]

Ecology

Ctenobethylus goepperti is thought to have been a dominant member of the warm-temperate and humid forests of Eocene Europe, an ecosystem now obsolete due to long-term climate change at the end of the Eocene epoch. Due to their likely arboreal habits and ecological dominance, they are one of the most abundant and commonly encountered ant species found in both Baltic and Rovno amber, constituting over half of all known ant specimens found in the amber. They are thought to have been aggressive, territorial arboreal ants similar to their relatives in the genus Liometopum . They may have formed large colonies, and likely constructed large carton nests in trees. Their robust head shape, musculature, and mandibles allowed them to excavate wood and build nests within the wood. [1] [6]

Associations with other organisms

There is evidence that these ants built roads to aphid colonies on conifers. [1] [6] They have been found together with Matsucoccus scale insects of the family Matsucoccidae in Rovno amber, in one of the few recorded cases of amber syninclusion between ants and scale insects, and the interaction is thought to be purely predatory as Matsucoccus species do not possess the mouthparts necessary to extract honeydew. [7] C. goepperti has also commonly been syninclusive with Germaraphis aphids in numerous European amber deposits like Rovno and Saxonian amber, suggesting an association between these ants and the aphids. [8] Additionally, a yet undescribed mesostigmatid mite of the laelapid genus Myrmozercon has been found encased in amber together with a C. goepperti ant, strongly suggesting a parasitic relationship as the mite's closest extant relatives are also strictly myrmecophilous parasites. This record offers the oldest known evidence of a close ecological relationship between mesostigmatid mites and eusocial Hymenoptera, originating at least 44 to 49 million years ago. [9]

Discovery in Goethe's amber collection

Transparent 3D render of Ctenobethylus goepperti from Goethe's amber collection Goethe Omeis dorsal inside.png
Transparent 3D render of Ctenobethylus goepperti from Goethe's amber collection

Notably, one well-preserved specimen of C. goepperti was found in German polymath Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's amber collection consisting of 42 amber pieces, 40 of which may be reliably located as of 2026. These amber pieces contained in total three major biological inclusions, namely the ant, a sciarid fungus gnat, and a black fly. The specimen was imaged in great detail with synchrotron-based micro-computed tomography to create a detailed three-dimensional model of the ant, the first one constructed of the species. This process revealed meticulous internal anatomical and skeletal structures in the head and thorax previously unknown in these ants. Goethe himself was unaware that his own amber collection included preserved insects and did not comment much on its potential for bioinclusions, although he did realize that the material is valuable for paleontology. [1]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Boudinot, B. E.; Bock, B. L.; Tröger, D.; Weingardt, M.; Hammel, J. U.; Grabe, V.; Solórzano‑Kraemer, M. M.; Jandausch, K. J.; Oberski, J. T.; Schmuck, T. (22 January 2026). "Discovery of Goethe's amber ant: its phylogenetic and evolutionary implications". Scientific Reports. 16 2880. doi:10.1038/s41598-026-36004-4.
  2. Bolton, Barry. "Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr, 1868) valid". AntCat. antcat.org. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  3. "Bethylidae". Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary . Merriam-Webster. OCLC   1032680871 . Retrieved 2026-02-11.
  4. 1 2 Mayr, Gustav (1868). Die Ameisen des baltischen Bernsteins. Beiträge zur Naturkunde Preussens (in German). Vol. 1. pp. 1–102.
  5. Heterick, Brian; Shattuck, Steven O. (29 April 2011). "Revision of the ant genus Iridomyrmex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)". Zootaxa. 2845: 1–174. doi:10.11646/zootaxa.2845.1.1 . Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  6. 1 2 3 Dlussky, Gennady M. (December 1997). "Genera of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Baltic amber". Paleontological Journal. 31: 616–627. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  7. Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2006). "First occurrence of syninclusion of ants Ctenobethylus goepperti (Mayr)(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and matsucoccids (Homoptera: Matsucoccidae) in Rovno amber". Russian Entomological Journal. 15 (4): 419–420. Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  8. Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (March 2006). "Occurrence of ant (hymenoptera, formicidae) and aphid (homoptera, aphidinea) syninclusions in Saxonian and Rovno ambers". Paleontological Journal. 40: 190–192. doi:10.1134/S0031030106020092 . Retrieved 11 February 2026.
  9. Dunlop, Jason A.; Kontschán, Jenő; Walter, David E.; Perrichot, Vincent A. (September 2014). "An ant-associated mesostigmatid mite in Baltic amber". Biology Letters. 10 (9): 1–4. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2014.0531. PMID   25209198 . Retrieved 12 February 2026.