DIRECT & Jupiter Rocket Family

Last updated
  1. 1 2 3 "Jupiter Launch Vehicle – Technical Performance Summaries". Archived from the original on 2009-01-29. Retrieved 2009-07-18.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  2. 1 2 "Benefits of DIRECT" (PDF). NASA.
  3. "End Run - A small band of rogue rocketeers takes on the NASA establishment". Air & Space Magazine. Smithsonian Institution. September 29, 2008. Retrieved 2008-10-19.
  4. 1 2 Chang, Kenneth (2009-06-17). "Review Panel Hears Rival Plans for New Spaceflight". New York Times. Retrieved 2010-01-30.
  5. NASA Has New Authorization but Future Remains Uncertain | SpaceNews.com
  6. "Jupiter Launch Vehicle – Technical Performance Summaries". Archived from the original on 2009-06-08. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  7. "DIRECT Presentation". The DIRECT Team. 3 July 2008.
  8. "Missions to Mars - Mars Sample Return". Archived from the original on May 18, 2008.
  9. 1 2 "DIRECT's Phase 2 baseline EOR-LOR lunar architecture" (PDF). Landing Twice the Mass on the Moon at Half the Cost. DIRECT Team. 29 May 2009. p. 25. Retrieved 2009-07-13.
  10. Sumrall, Phil (2008-09-10). "Ares V: Progress toward a heavy lift capability for the moon and beyond". AIAA Space 2008 Conference: 8. doi:10.2514/6.2008-7775. hdl: 2060/20090008534 . ISBN   978-1-62410-002-4. S2CID   110119858.
  11. 1 2 Block, Robert (2009-06-22). "NASA remains silent on rocket that could rescue the Cape". Orlando Sentinel . Archived from the original on 2008-08-04. Retrieved 2009-06-30.
  12. "Cycle 0(CY1991) NLS trade studies and analyses report. Book 1: Structures and core vehicle". NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). 20 October 2008.
  13. Harris, Richard; Kirkland, Zach (20 October 2008). "Cycle O (CY 1991) NLS trade studies and analyses, book 2. Part 1: Avionics and systems". NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). hdl:2060/19930013987.
  14. Cronin, R.; Werner, M.; Bonson, S.; Spring, R.; Houston, R. (20 October 2008). "Cycle O(CY1991) NLS trade studies and analyses report. Book 2, part 2: Propulsion" (PDF). NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). hdl:2060/19930014526.
  15. "88 Search Results for "NLS"". NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS). 20 October 2008.
  16. "DIRECT Space Transportation System Derivative;The Jupiter Launch Vehicle Family" (PDF). DIRECT Team. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  17. "Achieving the Vision for Space Exploration on Time and Within Budget" (PDF). AIAA Houston. Retrieved 2008-06-15.
  18. "Ares remains the answer for-ew frontiers". The Huntsville Times. June 29, 2008. Archived from the original on July 8, 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-29.
  19. "NASA - Frequently Asked Questions - What is the latest update on NASA's Transportation Architecture?". 2008-07-03. Archived from the original on 2010-01-12. Retrieved 2009-06-30.
  20. "NASA Background on Ares Vehicles versus the DIRECT Proposal" (PDF). 2008-06-25. Retrieved 2009-06-30.
  21. Marshall Space Flight Center (October 2007). "DIRECT 2.0 Space Exploration Architecture Performance Analysis" (PDF). Retrieved 2009-06-30.
  22. "DIRECT issue rebuttal over NASA analysis of Jupiter launch vehicle". NASA Spaceflight. May 18, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
  23. "Rebuttal of NASA's October 2007 DIRECT 2.0 Analysis Findings" (PDF). DIRECT Team. May 18, 2009. Retrieved 2009-05-21.
  24. Metschan, Stephen (2009-05-29). "DIRECT - Safer, Simpler and Sooner than Ares" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2011-12-15. Retrieved 2009-06-12.
  25. Tierney, Ross. "NASA Space Flight Forum - NASA CEV / CLV / CaLV / MTV / Alternatives - DIRECT v2.0 - Thread 3" . Retrieved 2009-04-01.
  26. "U.S. Announces Review of Human Space Flight Plans" (PDF). Office of Science and Technology Policy. May 7, 2009. Retrieved 2009-09-09.
  27. "NASA - Review of U.S. Human Space Flight Plans Committee". 2009-06-17. Archived from the original on 2010-02-06. Retrieved 2009-06-17.
  28. "Review of U. S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee" (Press release). Review of U. S. Human Spaceflight Plans Committee. 2009-10-22. Archived from the original on 2010-01-25. Retrieved 2010-01-30.
  29. Klotz, Irene (2009-09-14). "Leroy Chiao on the Augustine Commission - Q&A: The panel member and former astronaut talks with Discovery News about the report summary". Discovery News. Discovery Communications. Archived from the original on 2010-02-10. Retrieved 2010-01-30.
  30. Noland, David (2010-01-29). "Rebel Engineers Sit With NASA to Chart Future of Manned Space". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 2010-01-31. Retrieved 2010-01-29.
  31. "NASA Facts - Space Launch System Core Stage" (PDF). NASA. 2014. Retrieved 11 September 2015.
  32. "Agency Has Taken Steps Toward Making Sound Investment Decisions for Ares I but Still Faces Challenging Knowledge Gaps, Report to the Chairman, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, #GAO-08-51" (PDF). Government Accountability Office. October 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2008-10-14.
  33. "NASA Nominees Promise a More Relevant Space Agency". Space.com. 14 July 2009.
  34. "Orion's plea to Ares I: Stop adversely hindering our design process". NASA Space Flight .com, Chris Bergin. 15 September 2008.
  35. Coppinger, Rob (2009-07-10). "Shuttle derived Heavy Lift Vehicle: interview notes". Hyperbola - Orbiting the blogosphere with Rob Coppinger. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  36. "NASAfacts - Constellation - Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle" (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. January 2009. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-02-11. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  37. "NASAfacts - Constellation Program: America's spacecraft for a new generation of explorers - The Altair lunar lander" (PDF). Houston, Texas, United States: National Aeronautics and Space Administration - Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-29. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  38. Noland, David (February 2009). "NASA & Its Discontents: Frustrated Engineers Battle with NASA over the Future of Spaceflight". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 2009-03-23. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  39. "Direct Launcher". Archived from the original on 2022-04-13. Retrieved 2022-04-13.
  40. "NASAfacts - Constellation - Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle" (PDF). National Aeronautics and Space Administration. January 2009. p. 2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-02-11. Retrieved 2009-07-18.
  41. "Jupiter-246 - Lunar Crew Launch Vehicle Configuration - Vehicle Concept Characteristics - LV 41.4004.10050" (PDF). 2009-06-06. Retrieved 2009-07-21.
  42. "Jupiter-246 - Lunar EDS Launch Vehicle Configuration - Vehicle Concept Characteristics - LV 41.4004.08001" (PDF). 2009-06-06. Retrieved 2009-07-21.
  43. Mark Carreau (19 January 2008). "Severe vibration problem plagues moon rocket design". Houston Chronicle.

Presentations

Jupiter [1]
Jupiter Family.jpg
The Jupiter common core stage would have used Shuttle components
FunctionCrewed launch vehicle
Country of originUnited States
Size
Height70.9–92.3 m (233–303 ft)
Diameter8.41 m (27.6 ft)
Mass2,061,689–2,177,650 kg (4,545,246–4,800,896 lb)
Stages1.5 or 2
Capacity
Payload to LEO (185 km x 51.6°)
Mass60,282 kg (132,899 lb) (Jupiter-130)